docs: add evaluator CI failure scenario (#1826)

This commit is contained in:
Affaan Mustafa
2026-05-12 17:44:00 -04:00
committed by GitHub
parent 863519eecf
commit cd90c84c32
8 changed files with 274 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@@ -56,9 +56,10 @@ As of 2026-05-12:
`2.0.0-rc.1`.
- `docs/architecture/evaluator-rag-prototype.md` and
`examples/evaluator-rag-prototype/` define the first read-only
self-improving harness prototype: scenario spec, trace, report, candidate
playbook, verifier result, accepted maintainer-salvage candidate, and
rejected blind-translation candidate.
self-improving harness prototype: scenario specs, traces, reports,
candidate playbooks, verifier results, accepted maintainer-salvage,
billing-readiness, and CI-failure-diagnosis candidates, plus rejected
unsafe candidates.
- The npm package surface now excludes Python bytecode/cache artifacts through
package `files` negation rules and a publish-surface regression test.
- `docs/legacy-artifact-inventory.md` records that no `_legacy-documents-*`
@@ -199,7 +200,7 @@ is not complete unless the evidence column exists and has been freshly verified.
| AgentShield enterprise iteration | Policy gates, SARIF, packs, provenance, corpus, HTML reports, exception lifecycle audit | PRs #53, #55-#62 landed with test evidence | Needs PDF/export decision or next enterprise signal |
| ECC Tools next-level app | Billing audit, PR checks, deep analyzer, sync backlog | PRs #26-#39 landed with test evidence | Needs capacity-backed Linear rollout / broader evaluator corpus |
| GitGuardian/Dependabot/CodeRabbit-style checks | Non-blocking taxonomy and deterministic follow-up checks | ECC-Tools risk taxonomy check plus follow-up signals landed, including Skill Quality, Deep Analyzer Evidence, Analyzer Corpus Evidence, RAG/Evaluator Evidence, and PR Review/Salvage Evidence | Partially complete |
| Harness-agnostic learning system | Audit, adapter matrix, observability, traces, promotion loop | Audit/adapters/observability gates plus `docs/architecture/evaluator-rag-prototype.md` and `examples/evaluator-rag-prototype/` define read-only stale-salvage and billing-readiness scenarios with trace, report, playbook, and verifier result artifacts | Needs broader evaluator corpus |
| Harness-agnostic learning system | Audit, adapter matrix, observability, traces, promotion loop | Audit/adapters/observability gates plus `docs/architecture/evaluator-rag-prototype.md` and `examples/evaluator-rag-prototype/` define read-only stale-salvage, billing-readiness, and CI-failure-diagnosis scenarios with trace, report, playbook, and verifier result artifacts | Needs broader evaluator corpus |
| Linear roadmap is detailed | Linear project status plus repo mirror | Repo mirror exists; issue creation was retried on 2026-05-12 and remains blocked by the workspace free issue limit | Needs recurring status updates after each merge batch |
| Flow separation and progress tracking | Flow lanes with owner artifacts and update cadence | This roadmap defines lanes below | Active |
| Realtime Linear sync | Project updates while issue limit is blocked; issues later | ECC-Tools #39 implements opt-in Linear API sync for deferred follow-up backlog items | Needs workspace capacity/config rollout |

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ The fixture set lives in
It started with the May 2026 stale-PR cleanup and salvage lane because that
lane has real inputs, real accepted work, and real rejected work. The corpus now
also includes a billing/Marketplace readiness scenario so launch copy cannot
treat dry-run release evidence or roadmap intent as live billing state.
treat dry-run release evidence or roadmap intent as live billing state. A
CI-failure diagnosis scenario adds the log-first workflow needed before an
agent proposes fixes for red checks.
## Reference Pressure
@@ -96,6 +98,8 @@ Current corpus:
maintainer-owned branches with attribution and validation.
- `billing-marketplace-readiness`: verifies billing, App, and Marketplace
launch claims before public copy says they are live.
- `ci-failure-diagnosis`: requires failed-job logs, changed-file scope, and a
named regression command before a CI fix playbook can be promoted.
## ECC Tools Mapping
@@ -129,6 +133,5 @@ A candidate can be promoted only when:
The next evaluator/RAG corpus should add:
- a CI-failure diagnosis scenario with captured logs and a known fix;
- a harness-config quality scenario covering MCP/plugin/hook drift;
- an AgentShield policy exception scenario with SARIF and report evidence.