|
|
- C, C++, Objective-C and Rust unions are now indexed as first-class `union` nodes. A `union` declaration previously produced no symbol at all, so it never appeared in search or `codegraph_explore`, and anything attached to it disappeared with it — in Rust, every `impl SomeTrait for MyUnion` lost its edge, the methods from that impl were left pointing at a type the graph did not contain, and asking which types implement a trait quietly skipped the union ones. A union-shaped dispatch table in C now resolves its function pointers like a struct-shaped one. A `typedef union { … } Name;` in C keeps the typedef's name and is no longer mistaken for a plain type alias. Thanks @ctype-lab. Re-index after upgrading to pick up unions in existing projects. (#1515)
|
|
- C, C++, Objective-C and Rust unions are now indexed as first-class `union` nodes. A `union` declaration previously produced no symbol at all, so it never appeared in search or `codegraph_explore`, and anything attached to it disappeared with it — in Rust, every `impl SomeTrait for MyUnion` lost its edge, the methods from that impl were left pointing at a type the graph did not contain, and asking which types implement a trait quietly skipped the union ones. A union-shaped dispatch table in C now resolves its function pointers like a struct-shaped one. A `typedef union { … } Name;` in C keeps the typedef's name and is no longer mistaken for a plain type alias. Thanks @ctype-lab. Re-index after upgrading to pick up unions in existing projects. (#1515)
|
|
|
- A long-lived index no longer drifts away from what a fresh `codegraph index` would produce. When a file gained or lost a symbol, references to that name in files the sync never touched kept pointing at the definition that was correct before the change, and — because nothing distinguished two same-named definitions — the winner could come down to the order files happened to be written, which differs between a full index and a sync. On this project's own repository, replaying 80 commits through `sync` left 5.7% of connections wrong; it is now 1.3%, and the wrong-answers-still-being-asserted half drops by 99.7%. Since call edges are what flow questions follow and what `codegraph_explore` ranks files by, this quietly degraded answers as an index aged, with nothing to indicate it. Syncing is unchanged in speed, and an edit that only changes a function's body does no extra work at all. Set `CODEGRAPH_NO_REBIND=1` to opt out.
|
|
- A long-lived index no longer drifts away from what a fresh `codegraph index` would produce. When a file gained or lost a symbol, references to that name in files the sync never touched kept pointing at the definition that was correct before the change, and — because nothing distinguished two same-named definitions — the winner could come down to the order files happened to be written, which differs between a full index and a sync. On this project's own repository, replaying 80 commits through `sync` left 5.7% of connections wrong; it is now 1.3%, and the wrong-answers-still-being-asserted half drops by 99.7%. Since call edges are what flow questions follow and what `codegraph_explore` ranks files by, this quietly degraded answers as an index aged, with nothing to indicate it. Syncing is unchanged in speed, and an edit that only changes a function's body does no extra work at all. Set `CODEGRAPH_NO_REBIND=1` to opt out.
|