Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/feat/read-presenter' into feat/web-read-card

# Conflicts:
#	apps/web/tests/snapshots/code-mode-round/ui.expected.md
#	packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/chat/GenericToolCard.tsx
#	packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/skeleton/DetailsPanel.tsx
#	packages/client/ui-primitives/src/index.ts

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.md
-2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.md: b0873b7aa7bccd3d613f3113fa18207770952e5d
-2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.zh.md: f3472dbfc5a78924e77337bf92ce5983c8492c4c
+2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.md: 02347f2964942b89ec1f0a6ec483f4c2b2f9e68c
+2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.zh.md: ea927d35860fbbba567c47cea0ee3a45133ce0f4

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.md

@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ What happens between `dsh web` starting and the UI appearing? Three stages: the
 
 **Host side — compose the graph.**
 
-1. The composing app (`apps/cli`) ships the roster as ordinary rows in its `cordis.yml` config tree — client plugin packages are entry rows like every host plugin, and `--dev` appends the `client-hmr` row in code (`AppCLIEntry`) before the settle/sweep so the fail-loud triple covers it. A roster row that fails to import is caught by the boot's `assertEntriesLoaded`.
-2. The `dsh-client-modules` node half (the package is dual-face: its browser half is the module table) scans loader entries' package.json `dshClient` declarations and composes `window.__DSH_BOOT__`: `{ rev, entries: [{ id, url, rev, inject?, immediately? }] }`. The `inject` edges and the `immediately` mark come from manifests, never hand-copied. It refuses a declared plugin without a built `./client` bundle, and any malformed declaration field — activation-time fail loud (a FAILED fiber the sweep reports).
+1. The composing app (`apps/cli`) ships the roster as ordinary rows in its `cordis.yml` config tree — client plugin packages are entry rows like every host plugin, and `--dev` appends the `client-hmr` row in code (`AppCLIEntry`) before the host activation audit so the same check covers it. A roster row that fails to import is caught by `assertEntriesLoaded`; a row whose fiber rejects is reported with its original stack by `assertEntriesActivated` ([host boot decision](2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.md)).
+2. The `dsh-client-modules` node half (the package is dual-face: its browser half is the module table) scans loader entries' package.json `dshClient` declarations and composes `window.__DSH_BOOT__`: `{ rev, entries: [{ id, url, rev, inject?, immediately? }] }`. The `inject` edges and the `immediately` mark come from manifests, never hand-copied. It refuses declared plugins without built `./client` bundles and groups their package/path rows under one required source-build instruction; malformed declaration fields also fail activation, and the host audit reports either error from the FAILED fiber.
 3. Scanning is incremental per package — there is no full-rescan code path. Each cordis `internal/plugin` emission marks the fiber's entry name dirty (entry-less fibers drop O(1)); a microtask flush reconciles each dirty name against live loader entries, with package metadata (including the negative "not a client package" verdict) cached per name forever and bundle re-hashing reachable only through `rebuilt(id)`. The activation pass seeds the same dirty set from current entries and flushes synchronously, so first scan and steady state share one implementation. Each bundle's content hash is its `rev` (cache busting + HMR diff anchor), the row set hashes into `graph.rev`, and every row is fetch-served: `/plugins/<id>/client.js?rev=…`. The graph types are single-sourced in the modules package's `./impl` export — the webserver knows nothing about the graph (it is a plain route-registration plugin; modules registers the bundle route and taps the index render itself).
 
 Why is the roster yml rows and not a scan? Because which plugins compose into a deployment is a composition decision, not a package property — a dshClient package existing in the repo does not mean this deployment mounts it, so discovery-by-scan cannot make that call; the node half scans only what the tree actually mounted.

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.zh.md

@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ vendored Loader 经其 `internal` seam 消费模块系统——唯一调用点
 
 **host 侧——组合这张图。**
 
-1. 负责组合的 app（`apps/cli`）把名册作为普通行放进它的 `cordis.yml` 配置树——client 插件包与每个 host 插件一样是 entry 行，`--dev` 由代码（`AppCLIEntry`）在 settle/sweep 之前追加 `client-hmr` 行，使 fail-loud 三件套一并覆盖它。名册行 import 失败由 boot 的 `assertEntriesLoaded` 捕获。
-2. `dsh-client-modules` 的 node 半（该包是双面的：浏览器半就是模块表）扫描 loader entry 的 package.json `dshClient` 声明，组合出 `window.__DSH_BOOT__`：`{ rev, entries: [{ id, url, rev, inject?, immediately? }] }`。`inject` 边与 `immediately` 标记都来自 manifest，永不人肉抄写。它拒绝声明了插件却没有已构建 `./client` bundle 的包，也拒绝任何畸形的声明字段——激活期大声失败（FAILED fiber，由 sweep 上报）。
+1. 负责组合的 app（`apps/cli`）把名册作为普通行放进它的 `cordis.yml` 配置树——client 插件包与每个 host 插件一样是 entry 行，`--dev` 由代码（`AppCLIEntry`）在 host 激活检查之前追加 `client-hmr` 行，使同一项检查覆盖它。名册行 import 失败由 `assertEntriesLoaded` 捕获；fiber reject 的行则由 `assertEntriesActivated` 报告原始 stack（[host boot 决策](2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.md)）。
+2. `dsh-client-modules` 的 node 半（该包是双面的：浏览器半就是模块表）扫描 loader entry 的 package.json `dshClient` 声明，组合出 `window.__DSH_BOOT__`：`{ rev, entries: [{ id, url, rev, inject?, immediately? }] }`。`inject` 边与 `immediately` 标记都来自 manifest，永不人肉抄写。它会拒绝没有已构建 `./client` bundle 的已声明插件，并把它们的 package/path 行归到一条源码构建要求下；畸形声明字段同样会让激活失败，host 检查会从 FAILED fiber 报告这两类错误。
 3. 扫描是单包增量——不存在全量重扫代码路径。每次 cordis `internal/plugin` 发射把该 fiber 的 entry 名标脏（无 entry 的 fiber O(1) 丢弃）；微任务 flush 把每个脏名对账 live loader entries，包元数据（含「非 client 包」的否定结论）按名永久缓存，bundle 重哈希只经 `rebuilt(id)` 可达。激活趟从当前 entries 灌同一脏集合并同步 flush，初扫与稳态共享一条实现。每个 bundle 的内容哈希是其 `rev`（缓存失效 + HMR diff 锚点），行集合哈希进 `graph.rev`，每一行都经 fetch 供给：`/plugins/<id>/client.js?rev=…`。图类型单源在 modules 包的 `./client` 出口——webserver 对图一无所知（它是朴素路由注册插件；bundle 路由和 index 渲染 tap 都由 modules 自己注册）。
 
 为什么名册是 yml 行而不是扫描？因为哪些插件组合进一次部署是组合决策，不是包属性——一个 dshClient 包存在于仓库里，不代表这次部署要挂载它，扫描发现无从替人做这个决定；node 半只扫描配置树实际挂载了的东西。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.md
-2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.md: a2080024d36d54162f4f4aa79896e51efd708f59
-2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.zh.md: 1c430bf2939f9f556f378bdeb78872a0091a592d
+2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.md: 88f94b1f58ae7a3451c7772f4a9ff7d6564254c0
+2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.zh.md: ea2a8f70a6c2d4207d4388a9303fbc6ce6e94238

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.md

@@ -12,9 +12,9 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.zh.md)
 
 ## Decision
 
-**Composition is one flat assembled tree.** `apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml` plus `apps/cli/config/web.cordis.yml` holds every row — the host runtime (32 rows), the `api-gateway` row, the `webserver` row, and the `dshClient` rows (the browser roster; the modules row is simultaneously a host row). No spine bundle: every plugin is one row and every config field is yml-editable. That stance later became repository-wide, with the rows both surfaces share factored into `apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml` and each surface reduced to an overlay ([shared-base overlays](../simplification/2026-07-29-shared-base-config-overlays.md)). `--dev` appends the `dsh-client-hmr` row in code before the settle sweep — prod and dev differ by exactly that row. Row order carries no load semantics; activation is service-availability driven, and the boot compensates with a fail-loud triple: `assertEntriesLoaded` (import failures), `installFailLoud` (late apply rejections), and an all-ACTIVE sweep (PENDING fibers — cordis inject waiting has no timeout).
+**Composition is one flat assembled tree.** `apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml` plus `apps/cli/config/web.cordis.yml` holds every row — the host runtime (32 rows), the `api-gateway` row, the `webserver` row, and the `dshClient` rows (the browser roster; the modules row is simultaneously a host row). No spine bundle: every plugin is one row and every config field is yml-editable. That stance later became repository-wide, with the rows both surfaces share factored into `apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml` and each surface reduced to an overlay ([shared-base overlays](../simplification/2026-07-29-shared-base-config-overlays.md)). `--dev` appends the `dsh-client-hmr` row in code before the settle audit — prod and dev differ by exactly that row. Row order carries no load semantics; activation is service-availability driven. The shared audit rejects imports with no fiber, awaits only failed fibers to recover original activation errors, and reports services that leave a fiber `PENDING`; before throwing, it marks those exact rejection reasons through one process checkpoint so `installFailLoud` coalesces Loader's duplicate notification while unrelated unhandled rejections remain fatal. The Node app-boot artifact embeds `@cordisjs/plugin-include` while leaving `@cordisjs/plugin-loader` external, so the include's `EntryTree` and the host bind to one Loader peer instead of splitting a config tree across two Loader implementations.
 
-**Boot glue is a class pair.** `AppCLIEntry` (apps/cli) and `AppWebEntry` (the shell kernel) hold only what must exist independently of cordis: argv facts, the composed patch set, the parsed boot manifest, the module system instance, loading-page handles — everything else lives in plugins. `AppCLIEntry.run()` is three stages: layered env (ambient > cwd `.env` > `$DSH_HOME/.env`, closing the defect above) → patch composition → Loader include boot plus the triple. `AppWebEntry.run()` mirrors it browser-side: parse `window.__DSH_BOOT__` into a `BootManifest` (two views: npm-package rows for the module table, cordis-plugin rows for entry composition; malformed wire throws), build the module system, render the loading page, prefetch the `immediately` tier in parallel with Context/Loader setup, **await the prefetch before creating entries** (materialization is `tree.import`'s synchronous require, unprotected by fiber inject waiting; cross-package require edges such as i18n → runtime/client need every immediately-tier factory registered first — an empirically found 10–25% boot race otherwise), adopt the modules entry, create the graph rows, settle, sweep.
+**Boot glue is a class pair.** `AppCLIEntry` (apps/cli) and `AppWebEntry` (the shell kernel) hold only what must exist independently of cordis: argv facts, the composed patch set, the parsed boot manifest, the module system instance, loading-page handles — everything else lives in plugins. `AppCLIEntry.run()` is three stages: layered env (ambient > cwd `.env` > `$DSH_HOME/.env`, closing the defect above) → patch composition → Loader include boot plus the activation audit. `AppWebEntry.run()` mirrors it browser-side: parse `window.__DSH_BOOT__` into a `BootManifest` (two views: npm-package rows for the module table, cordis-plugin rows for entry composition; malformed wire throws), build the module system, render the loading page, prefetch the `immediately` tier in parallel with Context/Loader setup, **await the prefetch before creating entries** (materialization is `tree.import`'s synchronous require, unprotected by fiber inject waiting; cross-package require edges such as i18n → runtime/client need every immediately-tier factory registered first — an empirically found 10–25% boot race otherwise), adopt the modules entry, create the graph rows, settle, sweep.
 
 **Config sources have one declaration place each.** yml static values are engineering defaults; the profile json (`./.dsh-tmp-profile/config.json`, read-only, never created, cwd-anchored until the `$DSH_HOME` migration) is user config mapped through a static `PROFILE_MAPPINGS` table onto target rows (`provider`/`model` → the `api-gateway` row, `persistenceRoot` → the jsonl row); CLI flags map onto the `webserver` row with a field set disjoint from the json's; env values enter through yml `!!js` expressions, never through the mapping table. Patches replace a row's config wholesale, so the entry class re-reads the yml row's static values (bypass parse) and merges overrides on top. An unmapped json key fails loud. The resolved frontend `distIndex` rides the same patch channel — an assembly fact, not user config.
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.zh.md

@@ -12,9 +12,9 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 决策
 
-**组合结果是一棵平铺配置树。** `apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml` 与 `apps/cli/config/web.cordis.yml` 共同持有全部行——host runtime（32 行）、`api-gateway` 行、`webserver` 行、`dshClient` 行（浏览器 roster；modules 行同时是 host 行）。不做 spine bundle：每插件一行、每个 config 字段 yml 可改。这一立场后来推广到全仓：两个 surface 共享的配置项被抽取进 `apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml`，各 surface 则收敛为一份 overlay（[共享 base overlay](../simplification/2026-07-29-shared-base-config-overlays.md)）。`--dev` 在 settle sweep 之前由代码追加 `dsh-client-hmr` 行——prod 与 dev 的全部差异就是这一行。行序无装载语义；激活由服务可用性驱动，boot 以 fail-loud 三件套补偿：`assertEntriesLoaded`（import 失败）、`installFailLoud`（迟到的 apply 拒绝）、all-ACTIVE sweep（PENDING fiber——cordis inject 等待没有超时）。
+**组合结果是一棵平铺配置树。** `apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml` 与 `apps/cli/config/web.cordis.yml` 共同持有全部行——host runtime（32 行）、`api-gateway` 行、`webserver` 行、`dshClient` 行（浏览器 roster；modules 行同时是 host 行）。不做 spine bundle：每插件一行、每个 config 字段 yml 可改。这一立场后来推广到全仓：两个 surface 共享的配置项被抽取进 `apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml`，各 surface 则收敛为一份 overlay（[共享 base overlay](../simplification/2026-07-29-shared-base-config-overlays.md)）。`--dev` 在 settle audit 之前由代码追加 `dsh-client-hmr` 行——prod 与 dev 的全部差异就是这一行。行序无装载语义；激活由服务可用性驱动。共享 audit 会拒绝没有 fiber 的 import、仅等待失败的 fiber 以恢复原始激活错误，并报告让 fiber 停在 `PENDING` 的服务；抛出错误前，审计会通过一个进程级检查点标记这些 rejection 的确切原因，从而让 `installFailLoud` 将 Loader 的重复通知合并为一次，而无关的未处理 rejection 仍然致命。Node app-boot 产物内嵌 `@cordisjs/plugin-include`，但将 `@cordisjs/plugin-loader` 保持为外部依赖，因此 include 的 `EntryTree` 与 host 会绑定到同一个 Loader peer，而不会让一棵配置树横跨两个 Loader 实现。
 
-**boot 胶水是一对 class。** `AppCLIEntry`（apps/cli）与 `AppWebEntry`（壳内核）只持有独立于 cordis 必须提前存在的东西：argv 事实、合成的 patch 集、解析出的 boot manifest、模块系统实例、loading 页句柄——其余一律进插件。`AppCLIEntry.run()` 三段：分层 env（ambient > cwd `.env` > `$DSH_HOME/.env`，顺手关掉上述缺陷）→ patch 合成 → Loader include boot 加三件套。`AppWebEntry.run()` 在浏览器侧镜像它：把 `window.__DSH_BOOT__` 解析成 `BootManifest`（双视角：npm 包行给模块表、cordis 插件行给 entry 组合；畸形 wire 大声抛）、建模块系统、渲染 loading 页、immediately 层预取与 Context/Loader 准备并行、**create entry 之前等预取齐**（物化是 `tree.import` 的同步 require，不受 fiber inject 等待保护；i18n → runtime/client 这类跨包 require 边要求 immediately 层工厂全部注册完——否则有实测 10–25% 的 boot 竞态）、收编 modules entry、逐图行 create、settle、sweep。
+**boot 胶水是一对 class。** `AppCLIEntry`（apps/cli）与 `AppWebEntry`（壳内核）只持有独立于 cordis 必须提前存在的东西：argv 事实、合成的 patch 集、解析出的 boot manifest、模块系统实例、loading 页句柄——其余一律进插件。`AppCLIEntry.run()` 三段：分层 env（ambient > cwd `.env` > `$DSH_HOME/.env`，顺手关掉上述缺陷）→ patch 合成 → Loader include boot 加 activation audit。`AppWebEntry.run()` 在浏览器侧镜像它：把 `window.__DSH_BOOT__` 解析成 `BootManifest`（双视角：npm 包行给模块表、cordis 插件行给 entry 组合；畸形 wire 大声抛）、建模块系统、渲染 loading 页、immediately 层预取与 Context/Loader 准备并行、**create entry 之前等预取齐**（物化是 `tree.import` 的同步 require，不受 fiber inject 等待保护；i18n → runtime/client 这类跨包 require 边要求 immediately 层工厂全部注册完——否则有实测 10–25% 的 boot 竞态）、收编 modules entry、逐图行 create、settle、sweep。
 
 **每个配置源有唯一声明位置。** yml 静态值是工程默认；profile json（`./.dsh-tmp-profile/config.json`，只读、绝不创建、暂锚 cwd 直至 `$DSH_HOME` 迁移）是用户配置，经静态 `PROFILE_MAPPINGS` 表映射到目标行（`provider`/`model` → `api-gateway` 行，`persistenceRoot` → jsonl 行）；CLI flags 映射到 `webserver` 行、字段集与 json 不相交；env 值经 yml `!!js` 表达式进入，绝不进映射表。patch 整体替换行 config，故 entry 类旁路 parse 重读 yml 行静态值再叠加覆盖。未映射的 json 键 fail loud。解析出的前端 `distIndex` 走同一 patch 通道——装配事实，不是用户配置。
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.md
-2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.md: 92bb91c3e892d928cedf18ec57c725a116b6ffc8
-2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.zh.md: 5bee6df52f16d935aa4f4ccff8627a2d43d44c8c
+2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.md: c3deadb34d3a633525dde701c92bcc98c05e5d6e
+2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.zh.md: 7a6988423dcdffebb0a28735146439c8ade0a862

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.md

@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ Calls that stay un-evented (registry registration → explicit call → await):
 A trigger/menu/pick pipeline with zero knowledge of "commands":
 
 - The service holds only the source registry (`SlashSource{trigger: '/'|'@', name, order?, candidates, onPick, matchSpace?, matchEnter?}`; (trigger,name) unique; the optional `order` sorts the roster — lower first, default 0, ties keep registration order — and that sorted roster is both group order and polling order) and `sessionOf(sctx)`. Implementing a match hook IS the declaration of participation in space/enter adjudication; the pipeline polls in roster order, the first non-undefined answer wins, and no claimant means the default sink. matchSpace is synchronous (space fires mid-keystroke; hot cache only); matchEnter is asynchronous (it may await the source's own warmup, and a warmup failure rejects).
-- The controller holds the single authoritative hit (span included; retained for Space after the menu closes), the per-session menu store, the candidate-fetch generation, keyboard arbitration (combobox mode: focus stays in the textarea, ↑↓/Enter/Escape are intercepted and all pass the IME composition guard, with the single exception Shift+Enter unconditionally going first), and pick orchestration (outcome → self-dispatched bail events); a `dismiss()` verb backs MenuView's injected `onDismiss` (a pointer down outside both the menu and the surrounding composer card closes the menu; MenuView also localizes group titles through the `slash.menu` locale namespace and clamps its height to the viewport space above the composer via ui-primitives' `useAnchoredMaxHeight`); at each session scope's birth it runs `warm(projection)` once over the source roster — within that scope the projection holds only the stable sessionId, with no published/capability transitions; the scope disposer tears down the controller.
+- The controller holds the single authoritative hit (span included; retained for Space after the menu closes), the per-session menu store, the candidate-fetch generation, keyboard arbitration (combobox mode: focus stays in the textarea, ↑↓/Enter/Escape are intercepted and all pass the IME composition guard, with the single exception Shift+Enter unconditionally going first), and pick orchestration (outcome → self-dispatched bail events). `toggleSource(name, syntheticHit)` is the chrome-launch path: it seeds only that registered source over the caller's textarea selection and publishes `launcher = name` until close; ordinary typed tracking clears the launcher and restores the full trigger roster. Both paths render the same MenuView and execute the same `onPick` chain. A `dismiss()` verb backs MenuView's injected `onDismiss` (a pointer down outside both the menu and the surrounding composer card closes the menu; MenuView also localizes group titles through the `slash.menu` locale namespace and clamps its height to the viewport space above the composer via ui-primitives' `useAnchoredMaxHeight`); at each session scope's birth it runs `warm(projection)` once over the source roster — within that scope the projection holds only the stable sessionId, with no published/capability transitions; the scope disposer tears down the controller.
 - Trigger-detection word boundaries (`user@host` and URL `/` never trigger) and the guard tiers (plain: `/` everywhere + `@` inline / claimed: `/` suppressed, `@` live / frozen: none) are the frozen pure core.
 
 ### hub / facade: the resident shell and the strict-session input body
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ skill/@subagent references skip the placeholder + occurrence identity chain —
 - `conversation.input.dock` — the stacked strip above the input (QueueDock's read-only queue list lands here), ordered by `order`.
 - `conversation.composer.dock` — the stats band on the composer's top edge.
 - `conversation.input.left` / `conversation.input.right` — the tool-row left and right regions.
-- `conversation.input.plan` / `conversation.input.model` (single) — the tool row's two named control seats; the bar passes only `locked` (owner props), each stays empty until its owning plugin registers, no placeholder fallback.
+- `conversation.input.plan` / `conversation.input.model` (single) — the tool row's two named control seats; the bar passes only `locked` (owner props), each stays empty until its owning plugin registers, no placeholder fallback. The plan seat stays empty while inactive because the shared Command source owns entry; an effective plan target renders the warn-state `Plan ×` status button, whose only action is `/plan off`.
 - `conversation.hero.workspace` (root scope) — the Workspace picker shared by the no-session and blank Hero; a pick reuses or creates the target blank session through `connectWorkspace`, moving the draft where necessary before switching current.
 
 ### Testing discipline
@@ -122,6 +122,8 @@ The state machine's entire behavior is covered by pure-JS unit tests (event sequ
 | Space adjudication also claiming execute-kind commands | The misfire defense: after a space the whole line is an ordinary prompt; irreversible side effects keep explicit entry points only |
 | A generic tokenPattern decoration mechanism | Structured occurrence records replace pattern scanning |
 | A placeholder select resident in the tool row | Named seats stay empty until registration; a placeholder clashing with the real implementation is two sources of truth |
+| An always-visible Plan on/off toggle | The shared Command source already owns entry; a second entry point turns a status seat into redundant mode chrome |
+| A second plus-menu component/controller, or an Add/File group above Command | It would duplicate async candidates, keyboard highlight, focus retention, and pick state; the plus control is only a source-filtered launcher for the existing MenuView, and this scope has no file capability |
 | All references through U+FFFC chips (the pre-Decision-21 line) | Plain text + derived decoration carries zero identity state; the literal text IS the model projection, sparing undo/clipboard any special cases; the chip chain is kept for scenarios needing indivisible atomicity |
 
 ## Consequences

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.zh.md

@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ occurrence 表与 chip 三投影：
 对"命令"零知识的触发/菜单/pick 管线：
 
 - service 只有 source 注册表（`SlashSource{trigger: '/'|'@', name, order?, candidates, onPick, matchSpace?, matchEnter?}`；(trigger,name) 唯一；可选 `order` 对 roster 排序——越小越靠前、默认 0、同值保持注册序——排序后的 roster 同时是组序与轮询序）与 `sessionOf(sctx)`。实现 match 钩子即参与空格/回车裁决的声明；管线按 roster 序轮询，首个非 undefined 应答胜出，无人认领落 default sink。matchSpace 同步（空格在击键中触发，只许热缓存）；matchEnter 异步（可 await 源自身预热，预热失败即 reject）。
-- controller 持有唯一权威 hit（含 span；菜单关闭后为 Space 保留）、per-session menu store、候选 fetch generation、键盘仲裁（combobox 模式：焦点始终在 textarea，↑↓/Enter/Escape 拦截且全程过 IME composition 守卫，唯一例外 Shift+Enter 无条件先行）、pick 编排（outcome → 自派 bail 事件）；`dismiss()` 动词支撑 MenuView 注入的 `onDismiss`（指针落在菜单与所在 composer 卡片之外即关闭菜单；MenuView 还经 `slash.menu` locale 命名空间本地化组标题，并经 ui-primitives 的 `useAnchoredMaxHeight` 把高度收敛到 composer 上方的视口空间）；每个 session scope 出生时对 source roster 做一次 `warm(projection)`，projection 在该 scope 内只有稳定的 sessionId，无 published/能力跃迁；scope disposer 拆除 controller。
+- controller 持有唯一权威 hit（含 span；菜单关闭后为 Space 保留）、per-session menu store、候选 fetch generation、键盘仲裁（combobox 模式：焦点始终在 textarea，↑↓/Enter/Escape 拦截且全程过 IME composition 守卫，唯一例外 Shift+Enter 无条件先行），以及 pick 编排（outcome → 自派 bail 事件）。`toggleSource(name, syntheticHit)` 是 chrome launcher 路径：它基于调用方的 textarea selection，只 seed 对应的已注册 source，并发布 `launcher = name` 直至关闭；普通的键入式 tracking 会清除 launcher 并恢复完整的 trigger roster。两条路径渲染同一个 MenuView，并执行同一条 `onPick` 链。`dismiss()` 动词支撑 MenuView 注入的 `onDismiss`（指针落在菜单与所在 composer 卡片之外即关闭菜单；MenuView 还经 `slash.menu` locale 命名空间本地化组标题，并经 ui-primitives 的 `useAnchoredMaxHeight` 把高度收敛到 composer 上方的视口空间）；每个 session scope 出生时对 source roster 做一次 `warm(projection)`，projection 在该 scope 内只有稳定的 sessionId，无 published/能力跃迁；scope disposer 拆除 controller。
 - 触发检测词边界（`user@host`、URL `/` 永不触发）、守卫分档（plain：`/` 到处 + `@` 行内 / claimed：`/` 抑制、`@` 活 / frozen：全无）为冻结纯核。
 
 ### hub / facade：常驻外壳与严格 session 输入体
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ skill/@subagent 引用不走占位符 + occurrence 身份链——pick 直接把
 - `conversation.input.dock`——输入上方堆叠条（QueueDock 的队列只读列表落此），order 定序。
 - `conversation.composer.dock`——composer 上沿统计带。
 - `conversation.input.left` / `conversation.input.right`——工具行左右区。
-- `conversation.input.plan` / `conversation.input.model`（single）——工具行两具名控制位；bar 只传 `locked`（owner props），空到 owning 插件注册为止，无占位 fallback。
+- `conversation.input.plan` / `conversation.input.model`（single）——工具行两具名控制位；bar 只传 `locked`（owner props），空到 owning 插件注册为止，无占位 fallback。plan seat 未激活时保持为空，因为入口归共享 Command source 所有；有效 plan 目标会渲染 warn 状态的 `Plan ×` 状态按钮，其唯一动作是 `/plan off`。
 - `conversation.hero.workspace`（root scope）——无 session / blank Hero 共用的 Workspace picker；pick 经 `connectWorkspace` 复用或创建目标 blank session，必要时搬运 draft 后切 current。
 
 ### 测试纪律
@@ -122,6 +122,8 @@ skill/@subagent 引用不走占位符 + occurrence 身份链——pick 直接把
 | 空格裁决也认领即执行型命令 | 误触发防线：空格后整行是普通 prompt；不可逆副作用只留显式入口 |
 | 通用 tokenPattern 装饰机制 | 结构化 occurrence 记录取代模式扫描 |
 | 占位 select 常驻工具行 | 具名坑位空到注册为止；占位件与真实现冲突时是双真相源 |
+| 始终可见的 Plan 开／关切换 | 入口已归共享 Command source 所有；第二个入口会把状态 seat 变成冗余的 mode chrome |
+| 第二套加号菜单组件／controller，或在 Command 上方增加 Add/File 分组 | 这会重复异步候选、键盘高亮、焦点保留与 pick 状态；加号控件只是既有 MenuView 按 source 过滤的 launcher，且此 scope 没有文件能力 |
 | 引用一律走 U+FFFC chip（决策 21 前旧线） | 纯文本 + 派生装饰零身份状态；原文即模型投影，undo/剪贴板免特判；chip 链保留给需要不可分原子性的场景 |
 
 ## 后果

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-28-directory-picker-capability-seam.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-28-directory-picker-capability-seam.md
-2026-07-28-directory-picker-capability-seam.md: 892bb4b2c4fe200df91866c4ec4cf8bb7c58e940
-2026-07-28-directory-picker-capability-seam.zh.md: d738773adc853dae7b3496f0dc2901eebd0f0a08
+2026-07-28-directory-picker-capability-seam.md: 495062f910785e1bb2f421dbb25c01c399d45567
+2026-07-28-directory-picker-capability-seam.zh.md: 62fc87212ab627ea8819dab55e3a769b4a5afc42

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-28-directory-picker-capability-seam.md

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Placement and policy rulings folded into this decision:
 
 ## Consequences
 
-- `cordis.yml` chooses the interaction; `apps/cli` mounts `-browse` (the shipped default — remote-capable picking out of the box), one row having swapped backend and UI together; `-native` remains the host-display alternative.
+- `cordis.yml` chooses the interaction; `apps/cli` mounts the [`-auto` chooser](../feature/2026-07-29-directory-picker-adaptive-default.md), which resolves the host's situation at boot and mounts `-native` or `-browse` itself, one row still swapping backend and UI together; composing a backend row directly pins the interaction.
 - The wire gains `host.listDirectory`/`host.createDirectory` and four error codes; the connection fixture serves a deterministic browse tree and a deterministic `pickDirectory` path for keyless assembled tests.
 - A future interaction (or an Electron provider of the `native` interaction) is one dual-face backend package — no gateway surgery, no ui-workspace edits.
 - `ApiProxyDefaults.pickDirectory` (test-only injection) is gone; tests provide a stub `ctx.directoryPicker` like any other service.

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-28-directory-picker-capability-seam.zh.md

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ web GUI 的"打开本地文件夹"流程被焊死在一种交互上：`host.pick
 
 ## 后果
 
-- `cordis.yml` 决定交互形态；`apps/cli` 挂 `-browse`（随附默认——开箱即得可远程的选取），一行同时切换了后端与 UI；`-native` 仍是宿主屏幕方案。
+- `cordis.yml` 决定交互形态；`apps/cli` 挂 [`-auto` 选择器](../feature/2026-07-29-directory-picker-adaptive-default.md)，它在启动时判定宿主处境并自行挂载 `-native` 或 `-browse`，一行仍同时切换后端与 UI；直接组合某个后端行即固定交互。
 - 协议新增 `host.listDirectory`／`host.createDirectory` 与四个错误码；connection fixture 提供确定性浏览树与确定性 `pickDirectory` 路径供无密钥组装测试使用。
 - 未来的新交互（或提供 `native` 交互的 Electron 实现）只是一个双面后端包——无需网关手术，也不动 ui-workspace。
 - `ApiProxyDefaults.pickDirectory`（仅测试注入）删除；测试像提供其他服务一样提供 stub `ctx.directoryPicker`。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-29-request-level-llm-config-credentials.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-29-request-level-llm-config-credentials.md
+2026-07-29-request-level-llm-config-credentials.md: f12a2496a767decc3ce2b065f6be03009aec8992
+2026-07-29-request-level-llm-config-credentials.zh.md: 99fd90013a24746962ca02a5f4f18cdccd53f71a

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-29-request-level-llm-config-credentials.md

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+# Agent Note: request-level LLM configuration and the credential seam
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-29-request-level-llm-config-credentials.zh.md)
+
+> Scope: the first production consumers of `ctx.settings` (the two LLM adapter plugins), the new `packages/credentials/` capability family, and the `packages/util/atomic-write` extraction. The follow-up wire surface (`settings.*`/`credentials.*` RPC, secret-role masking, the web settings form) is a separate PR and not part of this note's shipped scope.
+
+## Problem
+
+The [settings seam](2026-07-28-user-settings-seam.md) shipped without a production consumer, and the LLM adapters were the motivating one: both froze `apiKey`/`baseURL`/catalog into adapter instances at plugin load, so a changed key or endpoint needed a process restart, and a missing key failed plugin load — the worst possible first-run posture for a personal config page ("store a key, then restart"). Secrets were also headed the wrong way: the natural move (put `apiKey` in the settings document) would have forced masking, server-side backfill on `replace`, and dotfiles-sync warnings, a mitigation stack for a problem peer products simply do not have — Codex (`env_key` + auth.json), Reasonix (`api_key_env` + home `.env`), OpenCode/Pi (`auth.json`), Claude Code (`apiKeyHelper`) all keep secrets out of configuration files.
+
+## Decision
+
+**Per-request resolution, not fiber rebuilds.** The adapters take an options thunk (and a per-stream credential resolver) instead of frozen construction facts, resolving once per operation — the Pi pattern, with its tested semantics: two requests straddling a change see two configurations, one request resolves exactly once, and an in-flight stream keeps the facts it started with. This deletes the entire swap machinery a rebuild design needs (`DUPLICATE_ADAPTER` ordering, `NO_ADAPTER` windows, a deferred-activation state machine) and makes a missing key a *request-time* actionable failure (`MISSING_CREDENTIAL` naming every entry point) while the route stays registered and the catalog stays browsable. The one registration-captured fact — the retry policy the `ctx.llm` registry snapshots at `registerAdapter` (plus pi-ai's route *set*) — re-registers the same adapter instance in one synchronous section when it changes.
+
+**Secrets are references, values live behind `ctx.credentials`.** Configuration (both planes) carries `apiKeyEnv: DEEPSEEK_API_KEY`; the three-package credential seam resolves it per operation. `credentials-local` layers the live process environment (read-only, wins — a launch-time override is operator intent and must be *visibly* read-only, so shadowed writes reject instead of appearing to succeed) over `$DSH_HOME/.env` (writable, byte-preserving line edits, a quoting ladder dotenv reads back verbatim, wholesale snapshot replacement on reload so a deleted entry never lingers — the Claude Code additive-reapply lesson). Resolution order in the adapters is literal `apiKey` first (preserving the historical `config.apiKey ?? env` observable semantics), then the seam, then — only without a mounted seam — the raw environment variable.
+
+**Per-plugin namespaces, schema ≡ `Config`.** Each adapter registers its own namespace (`llm-deepseek`, `llm-pi-ai`) with its plugin `Config` schema and its `cordis.yml` entry as the composition `base` — a settings section is the same YAML shape as the entry config, and `resolveAdapterOptions`/`resolveProfiles` stay the one explicit resolve step for both. A live snapshot failing a beyond-schema bound keeps the last good facts (the seam's last-good philosophy extended one level up); the entry config itself still fails load. pi-ai's `providers` became a dict keyed by route so base and user layers merge per provider and the route set is structural; the array shape fails loud with migration directions, and an empty dict is the valid dormant posture — a composition ships the adapter bare and every route stays a user-plane decision.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+- **A bridge plugin (`dsh-llm-models`) owning one unified `models` dict** — with per-plugin namespaces there is nothing left to bridge, and the adapter-mapping rules it needed were pure invented indirection.
+- **Secrets in settings.yaml under `role('secret')` masking** — deleting the problem (references) beats mitigating it (mask + backfill + sync warnings); the coding-agent cohort is unanimous.
+- **Registry-level live retry policy** — making `providerRetryPolicy` re-read per call would silently change the `ctx.llm` capture contract every registration relies on; re-registering the route in place keeps that contract and stays observable.
+
+## Consequences
+
+Onboarding is restart-free end to end (pinned by the `missing-credential` headless snapshot and the credentials-rotation composition tests): boot keyless, browse the catalog, store the key, prompt again. The demos mount `settings-local` + `credentials-local` by default and inline no `!!js` key plumbing. `runLoaderSmoke` gained `expectedExitCode` so a designed failure surface can be pinned rather than masked. Deferred: the wire/UI surface must redact `role('secret')` fields before any RPC exposes `describe()`, settings-layer arrays still replace wholesale (the deepseek `models` list), and a settings section cannot remove a composition-provided pi-ai route (only override or extend). Review of this seam later reworked where the store lives and who may read it, made one request resolve one configuration generation, and made route replacement atomic ([credential boundaries note](2026-07-30-credential-boundaries-and-atomic-registration.md)).

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-29-request-level-llm-config-credentials.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+# Agent Note：请求级 LLM 配置与凭据 seam
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-29-request-level-llm-config-credentials.md) | 中文
+
+> 范围：`ctx.settings` 的第一批生产消费方（两个 LLM 适配器插件）、新增的 `packages/credentials/` 能力族，以及 `packages/util/atomic-write` 的抽取。后续的 wire 面（`settings.*`/`credentials.*` RPC、secret 角色脱敏、web 设置表单）是单独的 PR，不在本 note 已交付范围内。
+
+## 问题
+
+[settings seam](2026-07-28-user-settings-seam.md) 落地时没有生产消费方，而 LLM 适配器正是当初驱动该 seam 的那个消费方：两个适配器都在插件加载时把 `apiKey`/`baseURL`/catalog 冻结进适配器实例，改密钥或端点就要重启进程，密钥缺失则直接使插件加载失败——对个人配置页而言，这是最糟糕的首次运行姿态（「先存密钥，再重启」）。机密的走向也不对：顺理成章的做法（把 `apiKey` 放进设置文档）会被迫引入脱敏、`replace` 时的服务端回填与 dotfiles 同步告警，为一个同类产品根本没有的问题堆起一整摞缓解措施——Codex（`env_key` + auth.json）、Reasonix（`api_key_env` + 家目录 `.env`）、OpenCode/Pi（`auth.json`）、Claude Code（`apiKeyHelper`）全都把机密挡在配置文件之外。
+
+## 决策
+
+**按请求解析，而非重建 fiber。**适配器改为接收一个 options thunk（外加按流调用的凭据解析器），不再持有冻结的构造期事实，每个操作解析一次——即 Pi 的模式，连同其经测试固定的语义：跨越一次变更的两个请求看到两份配置，一个请求恰好解析一次，进行中的流保持其起始事实。这删掉了重建式设计所需的整套切换机制（`DUPLICATE_ADAPTER` 顺序问题、`NO_ADAPTER` 窗口、延迟激活状态机），并把密钥缺失变成*请求时*可行动的失败（`MISSING_CREDENTIAL` 点名每个配置入口），同时路由保持注册、catalog 保持可浏览。唯一在注册期捕获的事实——`ctx.llm` 注册表在 `registerAdapter` 时快照的重试策略（外加 pi-ai 的路由*集合*）——在其变化时于一个同步区段内原地重新注册同一适配器实例。
+
+**机密是引用，值藏在 `ctx.credentials` 背后。**配置（两个面）携带 `apiKeyEnv: DEEPSEEK_API_KEY`；三包凭据 seam 按操作解析它。`credentials-local` 把活跃进程环境（只读、优先——启动时覆盖是操作者意图，必须*可见地*只读，因此被遮蔽的写入直接拒绝而不是表面成功）叠加在 `$DSH_HOME/.env` 之上（可写、保字节行级编辑、dotenv 能逐字读回的引号阶梯、重载时整体替换快照使删除的条目绝不滞留——来自 Claude Code 增量重放（additive reapply）的教训）。适配器内的解析顺序为：字面 `apiKey` 优先（保留历史 `config.apiKey ?? env` 的可观察语义），然后是 seam，最后——仅在未挂载 seam 时——原始环境变量。
+
+**按插件划分 namespace，schema ≡ `Config`。**每个适配器注册自己的 namespace（`llm-deepseek`、`llm-pi-ai`），schema 用其插件 `Config` schema，组合 `base` 用其 `cordis.yml` 条目——settings 分节与 entry 配置是同一种 YAML 形状，`resolveAdapterOptions`/`resolveProfiles` 对两者仍是唯一的显式 resolve 步骤。存活快照若违反 schema 之外的约束，则保留最后可用事实（seam 的最后可用值哲学向上延伸一层）；entry 配置本身仍会加载失败。pi-ai 的 `providers` 改为以路由为键的字典，base 层与用户层因此按提供方合并，路由集合也由结构直接表达；数组形状响亮失败并给出迁移指引，而空字典是合法的休眠姿态——组合可以裸挂该适配器，把每一条路由都留给用户面决定。
+
+## 曾考虑的替代方案
+
+- **由桥接插件（`dsh-llm-models`）持有统一的 `models` 字典**——有了按插件划分的 namespace，就没有什么可桥接的了；它所需的适配器映射规则纯属凭空发明的间接层。
+- **把机密放进 settings.yaml 并靠 `role('secret')` 脱敏**——删除问题本身（引用）胜过缓解问题（脱敏 + 回填 + 同步告警）；编码 agent 同类产品在这一点上口径一致。
+- **注册表级的实时重试策略**——让 `providerRetryPolicy` 每次调用都重读，会静默改变所有注册都依赖的 `ctx.llm` 捕获契约；原地重新注册路由既保住该契约，又保持可观察。
+
+## 后果
+
+上手流程端到端免重启（由 `missing-credential` headless 快照与凭据轮换组合测试固定）：无密钥启动、浏览 catalog、存入密钥、再次发起提示。demo 默认挂载 `settings-local` + `credentials-local`，不再内联任何 `!!js` 密钥接线。`runLoaderSmoke` 新增 `expectedExitCode`，使按设计出现的失败面可以被固定而非被掩盖。延后事项：wire/UI 面在任何 RPC 暴露 `describe()` 之前必须对 `role('secret')` 字段脱敏；settings 层的数组仍整体替换（deepseek 的 `models` 列表）；settings 分节无法移除组合提供的 pi-ai 路由（只能覆盖或扩展）。对该 seam 的评审随后改造了存储的所在位置与谁可以读取它，让一个请求解析出一个配置世代，并使路由替换成为原子操作（[credential boundaries note](2026-07-30-credential-boundaries-and-atomic-registration.md)）。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-adapter-owned-max-token-defaults.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-adapter-owned-max-token-defaults.md
+2026-07-30-adapter-owned-max-token-defaults.md: a522848fd4482f84859e587505b6a5e6f5c72d60
+2026-07-30-adapter-owned-max-token-defaults.zh.md: 8db6a06199fc1c4e73c86492d12dc86edafe8c7e

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-adapter-owned-max-token-defaults.md

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+# Agent Note: Adapter-owned max-token defaults
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-30-adapter-owned-max-token-defaults.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+An LLM adapter could serialize an explicit `GenerateOptions.maxTokens`, but its Cordis configuration could not establish a reconstructable conversation default. Applying a fallback only inside provider serialization would make the wire request differ from the durable `request/header`; putting every provider's default in Agent Loop would instead transfer deployment and model policy into the provider-neutral driver.
+
+## Decision
+
+`LlmResolvedModelInfo.defaultMaxTokens` carries an optional adapter-configured per-request output cap for one exact provider/model route. `LlmService` validates it as a positive safe integer and materializes it into `LlmCallConfig.maxTokens` only when the caller omitted a value. A prepared call identifies materialized `maxTokens` and `reasoningEffort` fields as adapter defaults; explicit request or Agent options remain unmarked and therefore win without clamping.
+
+The agent loop continues to prepare calls before logging `request/header`, so the effective config and its adapter-default provenance become durable request facts before dispatch. Before the next `agent/request` waterfall, the loop removes marked fields from the proposal; exact-model resolution then materializes the current route's defaults again. A provider/model switch therefore cannot mistake a previous adapter's default for an explicit override, while explicit conversation values persist. Direct `LlmService.stream()` calls resolve the same default at the final adapter boundary. The field is a request default rather than a hard model output limit; adapters that preserve provider-owned defaults omit it.
+
+The native DeepSeek adapter exposes `maxTokens` in Cordis config with a 256,000-token default and maps the effective value to `max_tokens`. Its default context capacity is 1,000,000 tokens: both built-in V4 entries publish that exact capacity, while configured entries without capacity and unlisted pass-through ids inherit the same adapter-wide fallback.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**Apply the default only in DeepSeek serialization.** Rejected because the provider wire would contain a model-visible value absent from the durable request header.
+
+**Set `AgentOptions.maxTokens` in every shipped application.** Rejected because applications would duplicate adapter deployment policy, direct LLM calls would behave differently, and selecting another provider would retain a DeepSeek-specific cap.
+
+**Represent 256,000 as a hard per-model maximum.** Rejected because the configured value is the desired request budget, not evidence that every configured endpoint rejects larger outputs. Explicit callers remain authoritative.
+
+**Leave the provider default in control.** Rejected for the native DeepSeek deployment because the product requires a stable 256,000-token conversation budget across compatible endpoints.
+
+## Consequences
+
+DeepSeek conversations send `max_tokens: 256000` by default, and the same value plus its adapter provenance appear in the session request header. Deployments can change the adapter default through `llm-deepseek.config.maxTokens`; per-agent and per-request values override it. Changing the route rematerializes the new exact adapter's default instead of carrying DeepSeek's derived value forward. Other adapters retain their existing behavior until they intentionally publish `defaultMaxTokens`.
+
+The 256,000-token output budget reserves a large part of the one-million-token context on endpoints that pre-allocate requested output. Deployments whose gateway or model supports a smaller budget must lower `maxTokens`; the explicit configuration is preferable to an undocumented provider fallback.

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-adapter-owned-max-token-defaults.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+# Agent Note: 适配器持有的最大 token 默认值
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-30-adapter-owned-max-token-defaults.md) | 中文
+
+## Problem
+
+LLM（大语言模型）适配器可以序列化显式的 `GenerateOptions.maxTokens`，但无法通过 Cordis 配置建立可重建的对话默认值。仅在提供方序列化中应用回退，会导致协议请求与持久 `request/header` 不一致；若将各提供方默认值都放进 agent loop（智能体循环），则会把部署与模型策略转移到提供方无关的驱动器中。
+
+## Decision
+
+`LlmResolvedModelInfo.defaultMaxTokens` 携带一条确切提供方／模型路由的可选单次请求输出上限，该值由适配器配置。`LlmService` 将其校验为正安全整数，并且仅在调用方省略值时才填入 `LlmCallConfig.maxTokens`。准备后的调用会将已填入的 `maxTokens` 和 `reasoningEffort` 字段标记为适配器默认值；显式请求值或 Agent 选项不带该标记，因此优先且不会被自动调整。
+
+agent loop 仍在记录 `request/header` 前准备调用，因此生效配置及其适配器默认值来源会在分派前成为持久请求事实。下一次 `agent/request` waterfall（瀑布式事件）前，agent loop 会从提议中移除带标记字段，随后精确模型解析会再次填入当前路由的默认值。因此，切换提供方／模型不会把前一个适配器的默认值误当成显式覆盖，而显式对话值则会保留。直接调用 `LlmService.stream()` 时，也会在最终适配器边界解析同一默认值。该字段是请求默认值，而非模型输出硬上限；保留提供方持有默认值的适配器会省略它。
+
+原生 DeepSeek 适配器在 Cordis 配置中公开 `maxTokens`，默认值为 256,000 token，并将生效值映射为 `max_tokens`。其默认上下文容量为 1,000,000 token：两个内置 V4 配置项均公布这一精确容量；不含容量的已配置项和未列出的原样传递 id 则继承同一个适配器级回退值。
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**仅在 DeepSeek 序列化中应用默认值。** 不予采纳，因为提供方协议会包含持久请求 header 中缺失的模型可见值。
+
+**在每个已发布应用中设置 `AgentOptions.maxTokens`。** 不予采纳，因为应用会重复适配器部署策略，直接 LLM 调用的行为将不同，而且选择另一个提供方后仍会保留 DeepSeek 专用上限。
+
+**将 256,000 表示为每模型硬上限。** 不予采纳，因为配置值是所需请求预算，无法证明每个已配置端点都会拒绝更大的输出。显式调用方仍具有最终决定权。
+
+**由提供方默认值控制。** 对原生 DeepSeek 部署不予采纳，因为产品要求各兼容端点都采用稳定的 256,000 token 对话预算。
+
+## Consequences
+
+DeepSeek 对话默认发送 `max_tokens: 256000`，会话请求 header 中也会出现相同的值及其适配器来源。部署可以通过 `llm-deepseek.config.maxTokens` 更改适配器默认值；每个 agent 和每次请求的值都会覆盖它。更改路由会重新填入新的精确适配器默认值，而不是继续沿用 DeepSeek 派生出的值。其他适配器会保留现有行为，直至主动公布 `defaultMaxTokens`。
+
+对于预分配请求输出的端点，256,000 token 的输出预算会占用 1,000,000 token 上下文中的很大部分。如果部署使用的 gateway 或模型仅支持较小预算，则必须调低 `maxTokens`；显式配置优于未记录的提供方回退值。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-client-locale-full-rollout.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-client-locale-full-rollout.md
+2026-07-30-client-locale-full-rollout.md: c080d9f240d4533ecd9694ceecfada8662c46425
+2026-07-30-client-locale-full-rollout.zh.md: 062d982e3d7ea62f3ca4c8fedb842e8336f0852c

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-client-locale-full-rollout.md

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+# Agent Note: Full client copy rollout onto the typed locale seat, and the non-translation boundary
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-30-client-locale-full-rollout.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+After the typed locale standard seat landed (`locale:` on register → framework-injected typed `t`), only four early adopters rode it; every other client package still shipped hardcoded, mixed-language literals. Migrating the rest required mechanisms and boundary decisions the early adopters never touched: how registration-time text (nav rows, view-tab labels) refreshes on a language switch; how the zero-cordis ui-primitives atoms receive copy; and which strings deliberately stay untranslated — an unrecorded boundary invites a future agent to "complete" the localization.
+
+## Decision
+
+**Registration-time text rides a label thunk.** A list registration's `label` accepts `SlotLabel = string | (() => string)`; owners projecting ledger rows resolve through `resolveSlotLabel` (never reading `options.label` raw) and make the read point follow the locale revision (outlets subscribe to the revision themselves; off-ledger projections such as the ui-settings nav fold the revision into their cache key and subscribe to both sources). Thunks evaluate per read, so a language switch causes zero ledger churn — no re-registration, versions stay put, and every `locale/change` re-registration wiring is deleted.
+
+**Component copy rides the standard `t` seat; deep children take `t` as a plain prop** typed `XxxProps['t']`. The dictionary canon is unchanged: `zh satisfies Record<string, string>` is the key source and `en satisfies Record<XxxKey, string>` locks bilingual balance.
+
+**Zero-cordis atoms (ui-primitives) take copy as props**: `labels` on `TerminalBlock`/`JsonTree`, `copyLabel`/`copiedLabel` on `CodeBlock`, `codeLabels` on `MarkdownText`, `truncatedLabel` on `JsonBlock`, `label` on `ConnectionBanner`, `closeLabel` on `Modal` — defaults are the previous hardcoded strings, so a consumer passing nothing renders byte-identical output. Localized plugins pass dictionary-driven labels from their own `t` seat; call sites passing object props memoize them on the `t` identity (`MarkdownText` caches its component table on the `codeLabels` identity).
+
+**The non-translation boundary (deliberate decisions, not debt):**
+
+- **Error/failure strings stay English**: client-authored fallbacks (`command failed`, plan-toggle failures), RpcError messages, and wire `error.message (code)` pass-throughs render verbatim.
+- **Design literals stay out of the dictionaries**: tool-row variant titles (Think/Bash/…), SYSTEM/USER-style kind badges, the Plan chip wordmark, the whole StatsLine — identical in both languages.
+- **ui-trajectory is deferred wholesale** (a developer inspection surface, terminology-dense, ruled separately).
+- **Boot copy stays hardcoded** (AppRoot renders before the locale service exists).
+
+**Derivation layers stay pure; localization happens at render.** ui-workspace's `relativeTime` returns structured `{unit, n}` composed with dictionary templates by the renderer; blank sessions and the Ungrouped bucket keep their stored titles, with the renderer substituting localized copy off the `blank` flag / absent `workspaceId`; **blank rows are excluded from search entirely** (a bilingual display title cannot match a single-language query stably). Dates use no Intl: format templates live in the dictionaries (message clock `clock.md`/`clock.ymd`, workspace hover `date.ymd`) and the formatters take `t` as a parameter, staying pure.
+
+**Test and e2e doctrine**: `makeTranslate(...dicts)` (dsh-client-test-runtime) mirrors the service lookup chain (first-dict-wins, key fallback, `{name}` interpolation); component specs stub the `t` seat with it, typed against real props seats. Web e2e uniformly opens through `newEnglishPage` (pins `dsh.locale=en` before boot) and the built-boot snapshot pins the same — goldens are immune to localization migrations; the settings language-switch scenario deliberately bypasses the helper to cover the zh default.
+
+The "apply layer subscribes to `locale/change` and re-registers for fresh labels" mechanism in the [settings/locale/theme layering note](../../proposed/architecture/2026-07-25-client-settings-locale-theme.md) is superseded by this decision (thunk + revision lifecycle).
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+- **Keep labels as strings and re-register on switch** (the early adopters' original shape): boot already registers once per package, and `locale/change` listeners re-registering amplifies into a storm; ledger version churn also busts every version-keyed projection cache. Thunks move the refresh cost to read points that already follow the revision.
+- **A locale context/injection channel for ui-primitives**: breaks the zero-cordis boundary (atoms would depend on the runtime) and drags unlocalized consumers (ui-trajectory) along. Props let each consumer decide independently.
+- **Error strings in the dictionaries**: the error surface is a debugging surface — verbatim English is what gets searched and compared in reports; wire pass-throughs are untranslatable anyway, and half-translation manufactures mixed-language text.
+- **`toLocaleString()`/Intl for dates**: follows the browser/OS language, not the app locale, guaranteeing mixed text after a switch; the dictionary templates are tiny and isomorphic to the message clock.
+- **Blank rows matching search (against localized or stored titles)**: either choice yields "visible but unfindable" in one language; placeholder rows carry no information, so whole-row exclusion is the stable semantic.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- A language switch refreshes the whole UI instantly with zero re-registration; adopting a new package is three steps (dictionary + declare-merge + `locale: NS`), no hand-written glue.
+- Cost: list-label consumers must know `resolveSlotLabel` (a raw `options.label` read can now hold a function); the `SlotLabel` type catches most misuse statically.
+- ui-primitives' Chinese defaults still render Chinese under the English locale **until a consumer passes labels** — the unmigrated JsonTree consumer (ui-trajectory) showing its English defaults happens to match that package's all-English status quo.
+- Pinning e2e to English means the zh default is covered mainly by package-level component specs and the settings language-switch scenario; browser e2e no longer asserts zh copy.

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-client-locale-full-rollout.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+# Agent Note: client 文案全量接入 typed locale 席位与不翻译边界
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-30-client-locale-full-rollout.md) | 中文
+
+## Problem
+
+typed locale 标准席位（`locale:` 注册声明 → 框架注入强类型 `t`）落地后，只有四个先行包接入；其余 client 包的文案仍是硬编码的中英混杂字面量。全量迁移需要几个先行包没有触及的机制与边界决定：注册期文本（导航行、视图 tab 的 label）在语言切换时如何刷新；zero-cordis 的 ui-primitives 原子组件如何拿到文案；哪些字符串**刻意不**本地化——没有记录的边界会诱使后来者"补完"翻译。
+
+## Decision
+
+**注册期文本走 label thunk。** ui-slots 的 list 注册项 `label` 接受 `SlotLabel = string | (() => string)`；owner 投影 ledger 行时必须经 `resolveSlotLabel` 解析（不裸读 `options.label`），并让读取点跟随 locale revision（outlet 自身订阅 revision；ledger 外的投影如 ui-settings 导航把 revision 并进缓存键、订阅双源）。thunk 每次读取时求值，语言切换零 ledger churn——没有重注册、version 不动，`locale/change` 重注册接线全部删除。
+
+**组件文案走标准 `t` 席位；深层子组件用 prop 下传**，类型写 `XxxProps['t']`。字典规范形态不变：`zh satisfies Record<string, string>` 为 key 源、`en satisfies Record<XxxKey, string>` 锁双语平衡。
+
+**zero-cordis 原子组件（ui-primitives）文案 props 化**：`TerminalBlock`/`JsonTree` 的 `labels`、`CodeBlock` 的 `copyLabel`/`copiedLabel`、`MarkdownText` 的 `codeLabels`、`JsonBlock` 的 `truncatedLabel`、`ConnectionBanner` 的 `label`、`Modal` 的 `closeLabel`——默认值即原硬编码字符串，不传 props 的消费者渲染逐字节不变。已本地化的插件从自己的 `t` 席位传字典驱动的 label；传对象 props 的调用点按 `t` 身份 memo（`MarkdownText` 的组件表按 `codeLabels` 身份缓存）。
+
+**不翻译边界（刻意决定，不是欠账）：**
+
+- **错误/失败类字符串一律英文**：client 自产的兜底串（`command failed`、plan 切换失败）、RpcError message、wire 透出的 `error.message (code)` 原样呈现。
+- **设计字面量不进字典**：tool 行 variant 标题（Think/Bash/…）、SYSTEM/USER 类 kind 徽标、Plan chip 字标、StatsLine 全部指标——中英界面显示一致。
+- **ui-trajectory 整包缓做**（开发者检查面，术语密集，单独裁决）。
+- **boot 文案保持硬编码**（AppRoot 渲染早于 locale 服务可用）。
+
+**派生层保持纯函数，本地化只在渲染层**：ui-workspace 的 `relativeTime` 返回结构化 `{unit, n}` 由渲染组合字典模板；blank 会话/未分组桶的存储标题不变，渲染按 `blank` 标志/`workspaceId` 缺席替换本地化文案；**搜索态 blank 行一律排除**（双语标题无法与单语查询稳定匹配）。日期不引 Intl：格式模板进字典（消息时钟 `clock.md`/`clock.ymd`，workspace hover `date.ymd`），格式化函数吃 `t` 参数保持纯。
+
+**测试与 e2e 口径**：`makeTranslate(...dicts)`（dsh-client-test-runtime）镜像服务查找链（首个命中字典胜出、key 兜底、`{name}` 插值），组件测试的 `t` 桩统一用它并以真实 props 席位定型。web e2e 统一 `newEnglishPage`（boot 前钉 `dsh.locale=en`），built-boot snapshot 同样钉 en——golden 对语言迁移免疫；settings 语言切换用例刻意绕开该 helper 覆盖 zh 默认态。
+
+[settings/locale/theme 分层 Note](../../proposed/architecture/2026-07-25-client-settings-locale-theme.md) 中"apply 层订阅 `locale/change` 重注册刷新 label"的机制已被本决定取代（thunk + revision 生命周期）。
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+- **label 保持 string、语言切换时重注册**（先行包的旧形态）：boot 每包一次注册已很重，`locale/change` 监听者重注册会放大成风暴；ledger version 抖动还会击穿一切按 version 缓存的投影。thunk 把刷新成本移到读取点，读取点本来就跟随 revision。
+- **给 ui-primitives 造 locale context/注入通道**：破坏 zero-cordis 边界（原子组件从此依赖运行时），且强迫未本地化消费者（ui-trajectory）陪跑。props 化让每个消费者独立决定。
+- **错误串进字典**：错误面是排障面，英文原样最利于搜索与上报比对；且 wire 透出串本就不可译，半译反而制造混合语言。
+- **日期用 `toLocaleString()`/Intl**：跟随浏览器/OS 语言而非应用语言，切换后必然产生混合文本；字典模板量小且与消息时钟同构。
+- **blank 行参与搜索（匹配本地化标题或存储标题）**：任一选择都在某个语言下"看得见搜不到"；占位行本无信息量，整体排除语义最稳。
+
+## Consequences
+
+- 语言切换全 UI 即时刷新且零重注册；新包接入 = 字典 + declare-merge + `locale: NS` 三步，无手写胶水。
+- 代价：list label 的消费方必须知道 `resolveSlotLabel`（裸读 `options.label` 拿到函数）；类型上 `SlotLabel` 已挡住多数误用。
+- ui-primitives 的中文默认值在英文语言下依旧是中文，**直到消费点传 label**——未迁移包（ui-trajectory 的 JsonTree）显示英文默认恰好符合其整包英文现状。
+- e2e 英文钉死意味着 zh 默认态主要靠包级组件测试与 settings 语言切换用例覆盖，浏览器 e2e 不再验证 zh 文案。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-command-row-copy-contract.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-command-row-copy-contract.md
+2026-07-30-command-row-copy-contract.md: f6d5199389b3907780c501894e2861e6add85e77
+2026-07-30-command-row-copy-contract.zh.md: 4afaf31640c07e88765060681739f262f322769e

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-command-row-copy-contract.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+# Agent Note: Command row copy is split between the row and the handler
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-30-command-row-copy-contract.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+The web command row renders `title · summary` from one logged [command lifecycle pair](../../proposed/architecture/2026-07-27-session-projection-and-command-log.md): the title was the dispatched line rebuilt from `command/run` (`/permission workspace-write`) and the summary was `command/done`'s verbatim `text` (`Permission preset: workspace-write.`). Both halves were written without knowing about the other, so the row said the command name twice and its argument twice — the single worst case being the row a user gets for every Access-chip pick.
+
+## Decision
+
+The row's two halves have disjoint jobs, and each side is written to its own half alone.
+
+The row title is the bare command name — no `/`, no arguments. The `/` belongs to the composer's input grammar, not to a settled record, and the argument is not the row's to report: the summary already says what the command did. `GenericCommandCard` keeps the `命令` fallback for a cross-window node whose `command/run` page fell out of the client's window.
+
+A command handler's settlement `text` therefore never labels its value with the command's own name, because the surface that renders it has already said it. `/permission` returns `preset workspace-write`, bare `current preset workspace-write (available: …)`, and for a bad argument `unknown preset "bogus" (available: …)`. Read as a row this is `permission · preset workspace-write`; read as a standalone line — the TUI appends the same text as a notice — it still states which preset now applies.
+
+The rule bans the *label*, not the vocabulary. `Permission preset: workspace-write.` lost because `Permission preset:` is a caption for a value whose caption is already the title. A domain noun that happens to contain the command's name is not a caption and stays: `/plan` keeps `Plan mode off.` and `Plan mode on. Use /plan off to leave.` (`plan · Plan mode off.` names the mode, and the tail is an instruction, not an echo), and `/goal` keeps `Goal cleared.`. A handler that finds itself writing `<Command> <noun>:` in front of its own value is the case this rule catches.
+
+The log is unchanged: `command/run` keeps the structured `name`/`args` split, so a richer registered command row can still render arguments from the same node without a second data channel.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**Keep the dispatched line as the title and only shorten the settlement text.** The argument would still appear on both sides of the separator (`permission workspace-write · preset workspace-write`), which is the repetition complained about.
+
+**Drop the settlement text from the collapsed row instead of the arguments.** It inverts the row's value: the outcome is what a durable record is for, and an error text would then have nowhere to land.
+
+**Have the row strip a leading command name from the settlement text.** Presentation would silently rewrite handler-authored text, and every handler that phrased its outcome differently would defeat the heuristic.
+
+**Ban the command's name from its settlement text outright, rewriting `/plan` and `/goal` to match.** The broader ban costs more than it buys: `Plan mode off.` and `Goal cleared.` are the clearest sentences those outcomes have, in the row and as standalone TUI notices both, and the shortenings that satisfy a name ban (`off.`, `cleared.`) read as fragments. Captions are the redundancy worth removing.
+
+## Consequences
+
+Every command row gets shorter, and the rule scales: a new command's author writes its outcome without knowing which surface renders it, and no surface has to de-duplicate. The cost is that the dispatched arguments leave the collapsed row — while a command is still executing the row shows only its name and `执行中…` — and that the no-caption rule is a convention the reviewer enforces, not a gate. The `/permission` texts are pinned by the permission package's command tests, and the assembled row copy by the [seeded-history](../../../../apps/web/tests/snapshots/seeded-history/command-row.expected.md) web golden, which reaches a real settled command row keylessly because `/permission` runs entirely on the host.

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-command-row-copy-contract.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+# Agent Note: Command row copy is split between the row and the handler
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-30-command-row-copy-contract.md) | 中文
+
+## Problem
+
+Web 命令行由一对落库的[命令生命周期事件](../../proposed/architecture/2026-07-27-session-projection-and-command-log.md)渲染出 `标题 · 摘要`：标题是由 `command/run` 重建的分派命令行（`/permission workspace-write`），摘要是 `command/done` 的原样 `text`（`Permission preset: workspace-write.`）。两半各自成文、互不知情，于是一行里命令名出现两次、参数也出现两次——最糟的一例正是用户每次用 Access chip 切换权限时得到的那一行。
+
+## Decision
+
+命令行两半的职责互不重叠，各自只按自己那一半来写。
+
+行标题就是裸命令名——没有 `/`，也没有参数。`/` 属于编辑器的输入语法，不属于一条已落定的记录；参数也不该由这一行来报告：摘要已经说清了这条命令做了什么。对于 `command/run` 那一页已滑出客户端窗口的跨窗口节点，`GenericCommandCard` 仍保留 `命令` 兜底标题。
+
+因此，命令 handler 的落定 `text` 绝不用命令自身的名字给自己的值加标签——渲染它的界面已经说过一次了。`/permission` 返回 `preset workspace-write`，裸调用时返回 `current preset workspace-write (available: …)`，参数非法时返回 `unknown preset "bogus" (available: …)`。作为一行读是 `permission · preset workspace-write`；作为独立一句读——TUI 把同一段 text 作为通知追加——它依然说明了当下生效的是哪个预设。
+
+这条规则禁的是*标签*，不是用词。`Permission preset: workspace-write.` 之所以出局，是因为 `Permission preset:` 是给一个值加的题头，而这个题头正是标题本身。恰好含有命令名的领域名词不是题头，因此保留：`/plan` 仍返回 `Plan mode off.` 与 `Plan mode on. Use /plan off to leave.`（`plan · Plan mode off.` 说的是那个模式，句尾是一条指引，不是回声），`/goal` 仍返回 `Goal cleared.`。真正被这条规则拦下的，是 handler 在自己的值前面写出 `<命令名> <名词>：` 的那一类。
+
+日志本身未变：`command/run` 保留结构化的 `name`／`args` 拆分，因此更丰富的已注册命令行仍可从同一个节点渲染参数，无需第二条数据通道。
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**保留分派命令行作标题，只缩短落定文案。** 参数仍会出现在分隔点两侧（`permission workspace-write · preset workspace-write`），而这正是被指出的重复。
+
+**从折叠行中去掉落定文案，而不是去掉参数。** 这颠倒了这一行的价值：持久记录存在的意义就是结果，而错误文案将无处落脚。
+
+**由这一行从落定文案里剥掉开头的命令名。** 呈现层会悄悄改写 handler 写就的文案，而任何换一种措辞表达结果的 handler 都会让这套启发式失效。
+
+**彻底禁止命令名出现在自己的落定文案里，并把 `/plan`、`/goal` 一并改写。** 这种更宽的禁令代价大于收益：无论在行上还是作为独立的 TUI 通知，`Plan mode off.` 与 `Goal cleared.` 都是这些结果最清楚的句子，而满足"禁名字"所需的缩写（`off.`、`cleared.`）读起来只是残句。值得去掉的冗余是题头。
+
+## Consequences
+
+每一条命令行都变短了，而且这条规则可扩展：新命令的作者写结果时无需知道由哪个界面渲染，任何界面也都不必再去重。代价是分派参数离开了折叠行——命令仍在执行时，行上只有名字和 `执行中…`——以及"不加题头"这条规则是靠评审执行的约定，而非门禁。`/permission` 的文案由 permission 包的命令测试钉住，装配后的行文案由 [seeded-history](../../../../apps/web/tests/snapshots/seeded-history/command-row.expected.md) web 预期输出钉住：因为 `/permission` 完全在 host 上执行，它能无密钥地抵达一条真实的落定命令行。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-config-plane-boundaries.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-config-plane-boundaries.md
+2026-07-30-config-plane-boundaries.md: 8a29dcc934126d6e3dfa9c0a6a308ef006017a5a
+2026-07-30-config-plane-boundaries.zh.md: c858b7dd5b6fcd61936c33f1f09d7d2e89a3cfc7

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-config-plane-boundaries.md

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+# Agent Note: what the configuration plane exposes, and who may overwrite what
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-30-config-plane-boundaries.zh.md)
+
+> Scope: the review round over the [web configuration plane](2026-07-30-web-config-plane.md) — which namespaces reach the wire, which callers reach them, and how an editor holding a partial, possibly stale view writes without destroying what it cannot see.
+
+## Problem
+
+The plane worked and was reachable by more callers, and with more authority, than its design claimed.
+
+`trustedHosts` gated only writes, so a declared LAN client could call `settings.describe` — every exposed namespace's configuration — and `credentials.describe`, which reports whether an arbitrary environment-variable name is configured and where it resolves from. That fence is a DNS-rebinding defense and says so; treating it as an authorization boundary for reads was a category error. Separately, the proxy served every registered namespace: the settings seam is deliberately general, so the first plugin to call `settings.register()` for its own configuration would silently become remotely readable and writable, without passing anywhere near a review of the web surface.
+
+The editor was worse than reachable — it was destructive. It reads the redacted descriptor, which by construction omits `role('secret')` fields. Clearing one field rebuilt the whole user section from that redacted copy and sent `settings.replace`, so a stored literal `apiKey` the wire had never returned was deleted as a side effect. Reproduced directly: `{baseURL, reasoning}` in, `apiKey` gone. Row removal took the same path. And nothing carried a version, so two tabs editing one namespace silently overwrote each other; the seam's per-namespace write queue orders writes but cannot tell a fresh writer from one replaying a stale snapshot.
+
+Three smaller defects sat beside them. `llm/adapters-updated` documented contained observer failures but only caught synchronous ones, so an async listener's rejection escaped as an unhandled rejection. llm-deepseek's retry-policy swap disposed its registration before re-registering, publishing an empty route set between the two — an observer saw the provider disappear and come back, despite a comment claiming no such window. And a transport rejection during the page's credential enrichment escaped `load()`, stranding the page in `loading` with no error shown.
+
+## Decision
+
+**Reading configuration is as privileged as writing it.** `settings.describe` and `credentials.describe` join the loopback-only set, so the whole configuration plane stays same-origin until real authentication exists. The model catalog (`llm.providers`, `llm.models`) deliberately does not: it carries provider ids, display names, and model lists — no endpoints, no key state — and a LAN client's model picker needs it. The boundary is asserted over a real HTTP server rather than a hand-assembled request, because the `Host` header a browser actually sends is what decides it.
+
+**The plane serves exactly the namespaces a registered model provider addresses.** `ctx.llm.listConfigurableProviders()` is the allow-list, so the product boundary is enforced rather than inferred from today's plugin set, and a future namespace becomes web-configurable only by joining that directory. An unregistered namespace and an unexposed one answer identically (`settings-not-exposed`), so probing cannot enumerate the registry.
+
+**A caller with a partial view names the field it means.** `Settings.mutate(ns, ops)` applies `set`/`unset` path ops to the section as it stands at the front of the write queue. The client builds ops by diffing its opening snapshot against its draft, so it mentions only fields it can see: a secret absent from both sides produces no op and survives by construction, not by care. `replace` remains the deliberate wholesale reset.
+
+**Staleness is detected, not ordered away.** Each namespace carries a monotonic `revision` over its RAW section; writes may carry `expectedRevision`, and a mismatch rejects with `SettingsConflictError` → `settings-conflict` on the wire, both revisions attached. The editor captures the revision it opened at and, on conflict, tells the user to reopen rather than replaying its snapshot.
+
+**The raw layer gets its own event.** `settings/updated` stays gated on the resolved value — that is what a consumer means by change. `settings/document-updated (ns, revision)` fires on any raw-section change, because a configuration surface must learn that a field went from inherited to overridden (same resolved value, different meaning) and that its held revision is stale. The host frame `host/settings-changed` now rides this event, and a change to an exposed provider namespace also emits `host/models-changed`: that namespace holds the provider's catalog, which no route change announces.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+- **A deployment-declared namespace allowlist on the proxy config** — more general, but it moves the product boundary to whoever writes cordis.yml, and an empty default would break the shipped page until every deployment opted in. The provider directory already states exactly which namespaces are model configuration.
+- **Opt-in metadata at `settings.register()`** — the most honest semantics (the namespace's owner declares its own exposure), and the largest change: the seam's public interface, both LLM plugins, and their docs. Recorded as the shape to adopt if a non-LLM namespace ever needs the plane.
+- **Distinguishing "unregistered" from "registered but unexposed"** — better diagnostics, and a namespace-enumeration oracle. The uniform answer is deliberate.
+- **Detecting conflicts by diffing instead of a revision** — comparing the submitted base against storage would work for whole-section writes, but the editor holds a REDACTED section: it cannot produce a comparable base, which is the same reason it cannot safely `replace`. A counter needs neither.
+- **Fixing the redaction gaps in this round** — `redactSecrets` walks only `object`/`dict`/`array`, so a secret behind a union, intersection, or transform is returned verbatim with an empty `secrets` list; `schema.toJSON()` carries a secret field's `.default(...)`; write-rejection messages return schema text that may quote the input; the client rehydrates the envelope through schemastery's `new Function`; and pi-ai's plain-string `headers` dict can legitimately hold `Authorization`. All confirmed, all deliberately left for a fail-closed `describeForWire()` that refuses a schema it cannot prove safe. They are recorded as `TODO(settings-wire-redaction)` and in the owning READMEs' Known Limitations rather than half-fixed here.
+
+## Consequences
+
+A LAN client on a `trustedHosts` deployment can no longer render the settings page at all; loopback is the configuration surface. A plugin that registers a settings namespace is not web-configurable until it also registers a configurable provider — deliberate, and the reason `settings-not-exposed` names the boundary in its message. `SettingsDescriptor` gained a required `revision`, so any programmatic constructor of a descriptor-shaped value must supply it, and `settings/document-updated` is a new event any provider-side listener may now observe. Clients that ignore `expectedRevision` keep last-write-wins semantics unchanged. Deferred: the fail-closed wire describe (with the `headers` and envelope-sanitization work it carries), and a non-executable browser schema protocol.

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-config-plane-boundaries.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+# Agent Note：配置面暴露什么，以及谁有权覆盖什么
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-30-config-plane-boundaries.md) | 中文
+
+> 范围：针对 [Web 配置面](2026-07-30-web-config-plane.md)的评审轮——哪些 namespace 能抵达协议、哪些调用方能抵达它们，以及一个只持有局部、且可能过期视图的编辑器该如何写入，才不会毁掉它看不见的东西。
+
+## 问题
+
+这个面能用，但能触达它的调用方、以及它们所拥有的权限，都比设计声称的更多。
+
+`trustedHosts` 只拦住了写入，因此一个已声明的 LAN 客户端可以调用 `settings.describe`——拿到每个已暴露 namespace 的配置——以及 `credentials.describe`，后者会报告任意一个环境变量名是否已配置、又从何处解析。那道 fence 是 DNS 重绑定防御，它自己也是这么写的；把它当作读取的授权边界，是一次范畴错误。另一件事是：代理服务于每一个已注册的 namespace。settings seam 是刻意做成通用的，因此第一个为自身配置调用 `settings.register()` 的插件，就会悄无声息地变成可远程读写，而完全不必经过任何针对 Web 表层的评审。
+
+编辑器比"可触达"更糟——它是破坏性的。它读到的是脱敏后的 descriptor，后者按构造省略了 `role('secret')` 字段。清空其中一个字段，会用这份脱敏副本重建整个用户分节并发出 `settings.replace`，于是一个协议从未回传过的已存字面 `apiKey` 被顺带删除。这一点被直接复现：输入 `{baseURL, reasoning}`，输出时 `apiKey` 消失。删除整行走的是同一条路径。而且没有任何东西携带版本，因此两个标签页编辑同一个 namespace 会静默互相覆盖；seam 的逐 namespace 写队列只排定写入次序，分辨不出一个新写方与一个重放过期快照的写方。
+
+另有三个较小的缺陷与之并列。`llm/adapters-updated` 的文档写着观察者失败会被收容，却只捕获同步失败，于是异步 listener 的 rejection 作为 unhandled rejection 逃逸。llm-deepseek 的重试策略换路由先释放注册、再重新注册，在两者之间发布了一个空路由集——观察者会看到该提供方消失又回来，尽管注释宣称不存在这样的空窗。还有，页面做凭据增强时的传输层 rejection 会逃出 `load()`，把页面卡在 `loading` 且不显示任何错误。
+
+## 决策
+
+**读配置与写配置同样特权。**`settings.describe` 与 `credentials.describe` 加入仅限回环的集合，因此在真正的认证层出现之前，整个配置面都保持同源。模型目录（`llm.providers`、`llm.models`）刻意不在其中：它携带的是提供方 id、显示名与模型列表——没有端点、没有密钥状态——而 LAN 客户端的模型选择器正需要它。这条边界由一台真实 HTTP 服务器来断言，而不是手工拼装的请求，因为真正决定它的，是浏览器实际发出的那个 `Host` 头。
+
+**这个面恰好服务于已注册模型提供方所指向的那些 namespace。**`ctx.llm.listConfigurableProviders()` 就是允许列表，于是产品边界是被执行的，而不是从今天的插件集合里推断出来的；将来的 namespace 只有加入该目录才会变得可在 Web 上配置。未注册的 namespace 与未暴露的 namespace 得到完全相同的答复（`settings-not-exposed`），因此探测无法枚举注册表。
+
+**持有局部视图的调用方，点名它真正要改的字段。**`Settings.mutate(ns, ops)` 会把 `set`/`unset` 路径 op 施加在写入排到队首那一刻的分节上。客户端通过对比自己打开时的快照与草稿来构造 op，因此它只提及自己看得见的字段：两侧都没有的机密不会产生任何 op，它的留存是构造使然，而非小心使然。`replace` 仍是那个刻意的整体重置。
+
+**过期是被检测出来的，而不是靠排序绕过去的。**每个 namespace 都带有一个针对其**原始**分节的单调 `revision`；写入可携带 `expectedRevision`，不匹配即以 `SettingsConflictError` 拒绝——在协议上是 `settings-conflict`，并附上两个 revision。编辑器记住自己打开时的 revision，冲突时请用户重新打开，而不是把自己的快照重放上去。
+
+**原始层拥有自己的事件。**`settings/updated` 仍以解析值为门槛——那才是消费方所说的"变化"。`settings/document-updated (ns, revision)` 则在任何原始分节变化时触发，因为配置界面必须知道某个字段从继承变成了覆盖（解析值相同，含义不同），也必须知道自己持有的 revision 已经过期。host 帧 `host/settings-changed` 现在搭乘这个事件；而已暴露提供方 namespace 的变更还会额外发出 `host/models-changed`：该 namespace 正持有这个提供方的目录，而没有任何路由变更会宣告它。
+
+## 曾考虑的替代方案
+
+- **在代理配置上做部署声明式的 namespace 白名单**——更通用，但它把产品边界交给了写 cordis.yml 的人，而空的默认值会让已交付的页面在每个部署显式开启之前直接失效。提供方目录本就精确地说明了哪些 namespace 属于模型配置。
+- **在 `settings.register()` 处 opt-in metadata**——语义最正（由 namespace 的属主自行声明其暴露与否），改动也最大：seam 的公共接口、两个 LLM 插件，以及它们的文档。记录为：一旦某个非 LLM 的 namespace 确实需要这个面，就采用这个形状。
+- **区分"未注册"与"已注册但未暴露"**——诊断更好，同时也是一台 namespace 枚举预言机。统一答复是刻意为之。
+- **用 diff 而非 revision 来检测冲突**——对整分节写入而言，拿提交时的基线与存储比对是可行的，但编辑器持有的是**脱敏后**的分节：它给不出可比对的基线，这与它不能安全地 `replace` 是同一个原因。计数器两者都不需要。
+- **本轮就修掉脱敏的缺口**——`redactSecrets` 只遍历 `object`/`dict`/`array`，因此藏在 union、intersection 或 transform 之后的机密会被原样返回，且 `secrets` 列表为空；`schema.toJSON()` 会带上 secret 字段的 `.default(...)`；写入拒绝的消息返回的是可能引用了输入的 schema 文本；客户端通过 schemastery 的 `new Function` 重建信封；而 pi-ai 那个纯字符串的 `headers` 字典完全可以合法地放下 `Authorization`。全部经确认属实，也全部刻意留给一个 fail-closed 的 `describeForWire()`——它会拒绝自己无法证明安全的 schema。它们被记录为 `TODO(settings-wire-redaction)` 以及各属主 README 的 Known Limitations，而不是在这里做一半。
+
+## 影响
+
+`trustedHosts` 部署下的 LAN 客户端已经完全无法渲染设置页；配置表层就是回环。注册了 settings namespace 的插件，在它同时注册可配置提供方之前不会变得可在 Web 上配置——这是刻意的，也正是 `settings-not-exposed` 要在消息里点明这条边界的原因。`SettingsDescriptor` 新增了必填的 `revision`，因此以编程方式构造 descriptor 形状值的地方都必须提供它；`settings/document-updated` 是一个新事件，provider 侧的任何 listener 现在都可以观察它。忽略 `expectedRevision` 的客户端，其后写胜出的语义完全不变。延后事项：fail-closed 的协议 describe（连同它所承载的 `headers` 与信封净化工作），以及一套客户端无法执行的浏览器 schema 协议。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-credential-boundaries-and-atomic-registration.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-credential-boundaries-and-atomic-registration.md
+2026-07-30-credential-boundaries-and-atomic-registration.md: 6fe5f554acbfd804db9625fcaa794d513c8799c4
+2026-07-30-credential-boundaries-and-atomic-registration.zh.md: 3eb3b022064124aad2a389abba3063af4e2110fa

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-credential-boundaries-and-atomic-registration.md

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+# Agent Note: credential boundaries, whole-snapshot requests, and atomic route registration
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-30-credential-boundaries-and-atomic-registration.zh.md)
+
+> Scope: the third review round over the [request-level LLM configuration seam](2026-07-29-request-level-llm-config-credentials.md) — where a stored credential lives and who can read it, how one request's facts stay one generation, and how a route set changes without a window. Companion to the [settings write-path note](2026-07-30-settings-write-path-integrity.md), whose provider fixes this round applies to `credentials-local` and whose writer lock it promotes into `dsh-atomic-write`.
+
+## Problem
+
+Review found the credential path leaking across boundaries it had drawn. The shipped surfaces hoisted `$DSH_HOME/.env` into `process.env` before cordis booted, so on the next run `credentials-local` classified every key it had stored itself as a read-only ambient launch override: `describe()` reported `source: 'env'` with `writable: false`, `set`/`unset` rejected as shadowed, and a key stored from the web page or TUI became unrotatable and undeletable while the adapter kept using the value captured at launch. The store's own write path repeated the settings-local defects that same review round fixed (two independent chains, whole-file render from a stale cache), plus editor bugs of its own: a physical line inside another key's quoted multi-line value read as an assignment, CRLF endings degraded to LF, a multi-line entry reported `writable: true` while `set` always threw, and `credentials/updated` was emitted bare after the commit, so one broken observer made a durable write look failed. On the read side, the file's `0600` mode stops other OS users but not the model, whose bash and filesystem tools run as the same user.
+
+Two request-path defects sat beside them. DeepSeek's per-request resolution kept connection facts in a last-good snapshot but re-read the literal `apiKey` from the raw configuration, so a settings generation the resolver rejected could still put its key on the previous generation's endpoint. pi-ai handed the SDK `undefined` when a configured `apiKeyEnv` resolved to nothing, letting pi-ai's own environment discovery authenticate with an unrelated provider key — another tenant, silently billed. And its route swap disposed the old registration before creating the new one: a route another adapter owned dropped every existing route, after which the facts cache could equal the registry's, so restoring the working configuration never re-applied.
+
+## Decision
+
+**`$DSH_HOME/.env` belongs to the credential provider alone.** No surface loads it into `process.env`. The genuine launch environment and the invoking directory's `.env` (loaded by the bin) stay the read-only ambient layer, so a composition without the provider resolves keys exactly as before, while a stored key stays file-sourced and writable across restarts — proven by a real restart in the loader composition rather than by a unit assertion about `describe()`.
+
+**The stored credential has no boundary against the model, and the READMEs say so.** `0600` under a `0700` directory stops other OS users; the model's bash and filesystem tools run as that same user, and the shipped default confines nothing. What the harness does hold to is narrower and stated as exactly that: no surface hoists the document into `process.env`, and the model is never handed a resolved path to it, so reaching the value takes a deliberate read of a path it was not given. An OS-keychain provider — a store the model's processes cannot read at all — is recorded as the real answer rather than implied by a partial one.
+
+**One request, one generation.** DeepSeek's resolved snapshot carries the credential facts (literal key and reference) beside the endpoint, and `resolveApiKey` receives that snapshot instead of re-reading configuration. A rejected generation now contributes nothing at all. pi-ai defers to provider-native discovery only for a profile naming no credential; a configured reference that misses fails with `MISSING_CREDENTIAL` naming the route and the reference. The boot-time credential probe is deleted: it could run before the credentials service mounted and reported every failure as a missing key, while the first request already gives the accurate error.
+
+**Route replacement is a registry operation, not a caller sequence.** `registerAdapter` returns a handle carrying `replace(providers)`: the candidate set is validated in full first (conflicts, names, provider metadata), then swapped in one synchronous section. A refused replacement leaves the previous routes registered and serving, and the caller's facts cache only advances after the registry actually holds the new set, so reverting to a working configuration re-applies. pi-ai's registration facts are sorted by provider, so a settings document that merely reorders its keys is no longer a route change.
+
+**Contained publication for committed credential writes.** `Credentials.notifyUpdated` fans `credentials/updated` out one listener at a time; sync throws and async rejections are logged without changing the committed operation's outcome, and `INVARIANT`-coded failures rethrow after every listener ran — the same shape the settings seam uses for `settings/updated`. `installSettingsSection`'s cleanup now distinguishes its two triggers: a provider detaching still falls back to the composition entry and re-derives, while the consumer's own unload returns immediately instead of re-registering routes during teardown.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+- **A sandbox read-denial naming `$DSH_HOME/.env`** — implemented as a `readDenyPaths` policy field (a trailing SBPL `deny file-read* file-write*`, a `/dev/null` bwrap bind) and withdrawn on its own evidence. bwrap must create that bind's mount point inside a tree its profile has already made read-only, so it refuses the entire confinement whenever the parent directory is absent — every host that has not stored a credential yet, including a fresh install; Landlock cannot subtract from its own `/` read grant, so every confined call would report `partial` for a file it never hid. A protection that breaks confinement where it works and misreports it where it does not is worse than a documented absence. Denying the whole harness home was rejected earlier for a separate reason: it also covers `sessions/`, and `DSH_SESSION_JSONL` is a documented model-visible capability.
+- **Removing `DSH_HOME` from the model's bash environment** — considered as defense in depth and rejected as theater with a real cost: the default home is a documented convention the agent can reconstruct, while the variable is how legitimate tooling finds harness state. There is no boundary here for it to complement; hiding the pointer would only make the absence harder to see.
+- **Shipping the OS-keychain provider in this round** — it is the only design where the model's processes genuinely cannot read the secret, and it is a sibling package with three platform backends. Sizing it against the rest of this review round would have delayed every other fix; it is recorded as the deferred answer, not as a maybe.
+- **A `replaceRegistration(previous, next)` service method** — the review's shape, but it makes the caller carry the previous handle and lets it pass a mismatched one. Hanging `replace` on the registration handle makes ownership structural: only the registration that holds routes can replace them.
+
+## Consequences
+
+`update()`-adjacent behavior gained documented failure modes: a credential write can now fail on the lock deadline or on an unparsable on-disk document, and `describe()` reports `writable: false` for multi-line entries it will not rewrite. `LlmAdapter` registrants keep working unchanged (the handle is still callable as the disposer), and `DeepSeekConnectionOptions` gained credential fields, so a programmatic constructor of the adapter must supply `apiKeyEnv`. Deferred: the OS-keychain credential provider, and per-value revision checks for two writers editing one reference (last-write-wins remains the documented resolution).

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-credential-boundaries-and-atomic-registration.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+# Agent Note: 凭据边界、按整份快照发起的请求与原子路由注册
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-30-credential-boundaries-and-atomic-registration.md) | 中文
+
+> 范围：对[请求级 LLM（大语言模型）配置 seam](2026-07-29-request-level-llm-config-credentials.md)的第三轮评审——存下来的凭据落在哪里、谁能读到它，一次请求的事实如何保持为同一代，以及一组路由如何在不留空窗的前提下更换。本 note 与 [settings 写路径 note](2026-07-30-settings-write-path-integrity.md) 配套：本轮把那篇 note 的提供方修复套用到 `credentials-local`，并把其中的写锁提升进 `dsh-atomic-write`。
+
+## 问题
+
+评审发现，凭据路径正在越过它自己划下的边界泄漏。已交付的各个面在 Cordis 启动之前就把 `$DSH_HOME/.env` 提升进了 `process.env`，于是下一次运行时，`credentials-local` 会把它自己存下的每个键都判成来自环境的只读启动覆盖：`describe()` 报告 `source: 'env'` 且 `writable: false`，`set`/`unset` 以被遮蔽为由拒绝，从 web 页面或 TUI 存入的密钥既无法轮换也无法删除，而适配器还在继续使用启动时捕获的那个值。
+
+存储自身的写路径重演了同一轮评审在 settings-local 修掉的那些缺陷（两条相互独立的链、从陈旧缓存渲染整份文件），还叠加了编辑器自己的缺陷：另一个键的带引号多行值内部的一条物理行会被读成赋值，CRLF 行尾会退化成 LF，多行条目报告 `writable: true` 而 `set` 总是抛错，`credentials/updated` 又在提交之后裸发，于是一个出错的观察者就能让一次已经落盘的写入看起来失败。
+
+在读取一侧，文件的 `0600` 权限挡得住其他 OS 用户，却挡不住模型：它的 bash 与文件系统工具就以同一个用户身份运行。
+
+与之并排的还有两个请求路径缺陷。DeepSeek 的按请求解析把连接事实保存在最后可用快照里，却仍从原始配置重新读取字面 `apiKey`，于是被 resolver 拒绝的那一代设置，照样能把自己的密钥送到上一代的端点上。配置了 `apiKeyEnv` 却解析不到值时，pi-ai 会把 `undefined` 交给 SDK，让 pi-ai 自己的环境发现拿一个毫不相干的提供方密钥完成鉴权——那是另一个租户，账单还悄悄记在它头上。而且它的路由替换是先释放旧注册、再创建新注册：只要有一条路由已被别的适配器占有，现有路由就会被全部丢掉，此后事实缓存可能与注册表中的事实相等，于是把配置改回可用状态也不会重新生效。
+
+## 决策
+
+**`$DSH_HOME/.env` 只归凭据提供方所有。**没有任何一个面会把它加载进 `process.env`。真正的启动环境，以及调用目录中由 bin 加载的 `.env`，仍然是那一层只读的环境来源，因此不挂载该提供方的组合，解析密钥的方式与从前完全一致，而存下的密钥跨重启仍然来源于文件、仍然可写——这一点由 Loader 组合中的一次真实重启来证明，而不是靠对 `describe()` 的单元断言。
+
+**存下的凭据对模型没有边界，而 README 就是这么写的。**`0700` 目录下的 `0600` 挡得住其他 OS 用户；模型的 bash 与文件系统工具正是以同一用户身份运行，而已交付的默认值不约束任何东西。harness 真正守住的更窄，也就照这个宽度写下来：没有任何一个面会把该文档提升进 `process.env`，模型也从不会拿到它的解析后路径，因此要拿到这个值，需要刻意去读一条并未交给它的路径。OS 钥匙串（keychain）提供方——一个模型的进程根本读不到的存储——被记录为真正的答案，而不是靠一个残缺的方案去暗示它。
+
+**一次请求，一代设置。**DeepSeek 解析出的快照在端点旁一并携带凭据事实（字面密钥与引用），`resolveApiKey` 接收这份快照，而不再重新读取配置。被拒绝的那一代如今完全不再贡献任何东西。只有当一个 profile 完全没有点名凭据时，pi-ai 才交给提供方原生的发现流程；配置了引用却解析不到，就以 `MISSING_CREDENTIAL` 失败，并点名该路由与该引用。启动时的凭据探测被删除：它可能在凭据服务挂载之前就运行，并把每一种失败都报成密钥缺失，而第一次请求本就会给出准确的错误。
+
+**路由替换是注册表的操作，不是调用方的一串步骤。**`registerAdapter` 返回一个携带 `replace(providers)` 的句柄：候选集合先被完整校验（冲突、名称、提供方元数据），再在一个同步区段内完成替换。被拒绝的替换会让先前的路由保持注册并继续服务，而调用方的事实缓存只有在注册表确实持有新集合之后才会推进，因此改回可用配置时会重新生效。pi-ai 的注册事实按提供方排序，因此仅仅调换键顺序的设置文档不再算作路由变更。
+
+**已提交的凭据写入采用收容式发布。**`Credentials.notifyUpdated` 逐个监听器扇出 `credentials/updated`；同步抛错与异步 rejection 都只记日志，不改变已提交操作的结果，而带 `INVARIANT` 代码的失败会在每个监听器都运行完之后重抛——与 settings seam 处理 `settings/updated` 的形状相同。`installSettingsSection` 的清理现在会区分它的两个触发来源：提供方脱离时仍回退到组合的 entry 配置并重新推导，而消费方自身卸载时立即返回，不再在拆卸过程中重新注册路由。
+
+## 曾考虑的替代方案
+
+- **用沙箱点名拒读 `$DSH_HOME/.env`**——已按 `readDenyPaths` 策略字段实现过（末尾一条 SBPL `deny file-read* file-write*`、一条 `/dev/null` 的 bwrap bind），又被它自己的证据推翻。bwrap 必须在自己 profile 已经置为只读的目录树内部创建该 bind 的挂载点，因此只要父目录不存在，它就会拒绝整次约束——那是每一台还没有存过凭据的主机，包括全新安装；Landlock 无法从它自己对 `/` 的读取授权中减去任何东西，于是每一次受限调用都会为一个它其实从未藏起的文件报 `partial`。一项在生效之处破坏约束、在不生效之处误报的保护，比一条写明的「没有保护」更糟。至于拒掉整个 harness home，早先另有理由被否：它同时覆盖 `sessions/`，而 `DSH_SESSION_JSONL` 是一项成文的、模型可见的能力。
+- **把 `DSH_HOME` 从模型的 bash 环境中移除**——作为纵深防御考虑过，最终按「有真实代价的表演」不予采纳：默认 home 是 agent（智能体）能自行重建的成文约定，而这个变量正是正当工具链定位 harness 状态的途径。这里并不存在一条需要它来补强的边界，藏起指针只会让这份缺席更难被看见。
+- **本轮就交付 OS 钥匙串提供方**——只有这个设计能让模型的进程真正读不到机密，而它是一个带三种平台后端的兄弟包（package）。把它与本轮评审的其余工作放在一起评估体量，会拖慢其他每一项修复；它被记录为那个延后的答案，而不是一个「也许」。
+- **做成 `replaceRegistration(previous, next)` 服务方法**——这是评审给出的形状，但它要求调用方自行携带上一个句柄，也允许它传入一个不匹配的句柄。把 `replace` 挂在注册句柄上，让归属关系变成结构性的：只有持有路由的那一项注册才能替换它们。
+
+## 后果
+
+`update()` 邻近的行为多了成文的失败模式：凭据写入现在可能因锁截止时间到期、或磁盘文档无法解析而失败，`describe()` 对它不会改写的多行条目报告 `writable: false`。`LlmAdapter` 的注册方无需改动即可继续工作（句柄本身仍可当作释放器调用），`DeepSeekConnectionOptions` 则新增了凭据字段，因此以编程方式构造该适配器必须提供 `apiKeyEnv`。延后事项：OS 钥匙串凭据提供方，以及针对两个写方编辑同一引用的逐值修订号检查（后写胜出仍是成文的解决方式）。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-web-config-plane.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-web-config-plane.md
+2026-07-30-web-config-plane.md: 95ede6264026f7b32e95749d00fe841f57dbf867
+2026-07-30-web-config-plane.zh.md: 6e06b69218a405055621cbd40781f9fbda9f9e6b

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-web-config-plane.md

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+# Agent Note: the web configuration plane
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-30-web-config-plane.zh.md)
+
+> Scope: the wire face and web UI deferred from the [request-level LLM configuration note](2026-07-29-request-level-llm-config-credentials.md) — the `settings.*`/`credentials.*`/`llm.*` RPC domains with pushed invalidations, layered+redacted `describe()`, the llm configurable-provider directory and topology event, the standalone `dsh-client-schema-form` model layer, and the Models settings page with its hand-written provider editor. The `deepseek` → `deepseek-official` provider-route rename rides along as the enabling breaking change.
+
+## Problem
+
+PR1 made LLM adapter configuration restart-free at the seam, but the only writer was a text editor on `settings.yaml`: the web client had no wire access to settings, credentials, or provider topology, so "store a key, prompt again" still meant leaving the product. Three gaps blocked a config page rather than one: `describe()` returned only the merged effective value (a form cannot tell a user override from a composition default, and serializing it would have shipped `role('secret')` values to every browser), nothing enumerated the providers an adapter *could* run (a bare-mounted `llm-pi-ai` was invisible until configured), and the two adapters both wanted a `deepseek` route key, so the directory could not attribute routes to owning namespaces unambiguously. Hand-maintaining a form per provider was rejected outright — the schemas already exist as schemastery `Config` values, and a second source of field truth drifts.
+
+## Decision
+
+**Wire domains on the compiled RPC map, rejections as codes, invalidations as frames.** `settings.describe/update/replace`, `credentials.describe/set/unset`, `llm.providers`, and `llm.models` (claiming the reserved `host.listModels` surface) join `RpcMethodMap`, so the seven compiler-locked wiring sites keep contract, schema, handler, and client in lockstep. Seam rejections fold into `settings-rejected {ns}` / `credential-rejected {ref}` business errors (HTTP stays a carrier), and three `HostFrame`s — `host/settings-changed {ns}`, `host/credentials-changed {ref}`, `host/models-changed` — follow the `host/commands-changed` shape so every client converges without polling. Writes join `pickDirectory`/`openPath` in the connection guard's privileged set: loopback + same-origin or 403, because a LAN-exposed dsh web must not accept config mutation from another origin.
+
+**`describe()` grows layers and structural secret redaction.** `SettingsDescriptor` carries `base`/`user` beside the effective value, so the form marks "overridden" by presence in the user layer, not value inequality (an override *equal* to the base is still an override). `describe({ redactSecrets: true })` — mandatory at every wire face — strips `role('secret')` subtrees from all three layers via a pure structural walk of the schema (object/dict/array containers; a secret-role subtree is one opaque leaf) and enumerates the stripped slots as `{path, set}`, so a page can render write-only inputs without ever receiving a value.
+
+**The llm seam declares configurability and announces topology.** `registerConfigurableProviders()` is an all-or-nothing, fiber-scoped directory of `{provider, displayName, settingsNs, settingsPath}` — the addressing a config page needs to open the right settings subtree for a route that may not exist yet; `listConfigurableProviders()` merges with live routes in the wire handler so undeclared live routes still report active. The zero-payload `'llm/adapters-updated'` event fires from all four registration/unregistration commit points with contained listener dispatch (INVARIANT rethrow), following the settings/commands precedent. `llm-deepseek`'s route renamed to `deepseek-official` because the pi-ai catalog legitimately owns `deepseek` as an aggregator entry; pre-release stance, no alias.
+
+**A hand-written editor over a schema model layer.** `dsh-client-schema-form` rehydrates the wire's `toJSON()` envelope into live schemastery nodes for validation, path resolution, and immutable draft editing — but no generic rendering: the first cut shipped a full schema-driven form renderer, and the resulting page was an unstyled schema dump (every advanced field flattened onto the card, raw field names as labels, the `retryPolicy` unsupported-fallback in the main flow). The user chose the hand-written direction over adding a hint/grouping system, and a second round removed the reference input entirely: the card's primary field is one **API key** input, a whole-section provider without a configured key opens as its setup card, and the collapsed 自定义设置 fold carries the curated per-family extras (`baseURL` for both families, plus `reasoningEffort` for deepseek / `reasoning` for pi-ai), with every other field owned by `settings.yaml`. Validation still runs the rehydrated schema before writing, so a hand-coded field that drifts from its schema fails loud on save rather than silently.
+
+**The Models page is a three-domain join with seam-shaped apply semantics.** Rows are configured providers; the add card's select is the dormant directory remainder; badges come from route liveness. The key path stays reference-shaped without ever showing a reference: a typed key stores **write-only** through `credentials.set` under the profile's `apiKeyEnv`, deriving `<ROUTE>_API_KEY` when none exists (the pi-ai profile records the derivation), so `settings.yaml` never carries a key value and the wholesale `settings.replace` a removal needs can never drop a sibling's secret. An edit without removals lands as a minimal `settings.update` merge patch; clearing a fold field back to inherited or deleting a row replaces the whole user section, because merge semantics cannot express removal.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+- **Serving JSON Schema over the wire** — schemastery's `toJSON()` envelope round-trips `role()`/meta and rehydrates into the validator the client already ships for drafts; converting to JSON Schema loses exactly the role annotations the credential control and secret redaction key on.
+- **A generic schema-driven form renderer** — implemented first, then replaced: field truth without visual hierarchy produced an ugly, unusable card, and making it good meant building a hint vocabulary (primary/advanced grouping, per-field descriptions, array item cards) rivaling the hand-written editor in cost while still fitting no mockup exactly. Two schemas exist today (the deepseek `Config` and the shared pi-ai profile), so hand-writing is two thin namespace-keyed layouts; the drift risk is bounded by save-time schema validation and by unknown fields staying untouched in the document.
+- **Masking secrets per-field with sentinel backfill on `replace`** — the PR1 decision (secrets are references) already deleted the stored-literal case for the product default; structural redaction plus a write-only credential path handles the residue without teaching every writer a sentinel protocol.
+- **Storing the typed key as a literal `apiKey` setting** — the v1 "one API key input" requirement could have written the literal into the profile, but every UI removal path rebuilds the user section from the *redacted* layers, so any reset or row deletion would silently drop stored sibling keys; deriving a reference keeps the input single-field while keeping `settings.yaml` secret-free and every replace safe.
+- **A `models` bridge plugin owning provider configuration** — same rejection as PR1: per-plugin namespaces plus a four-field directory declaration give the UI everything it needs; the bridge's unified dict re-imports the adapter-mapping indirection.
+- **Page-side polling instead of pushed frames** — the mux already carries `host/commands-changed`; three more frames cost one shape each and make a second tab, an external `settings.yaml` edit, and a settings-born route converge at event speed.
+
+## Consequences
+
+The whole loop is pinned keyless in the browser lane (`apps/web/tests/models-settings.e2e.ts`): the add card offers the dormant pi-ai catalog, adding `minimax-cn` with a typed key writes the reference-only profile into `settings.yaml`, stores the value into the harness home's `.env` under the derived `MINIMAX_CN_API_KEY`, registers the route live on the topology frame, and the customized fold merges `reasoning` beside the reference — zero model calls, ARIA goldens for the add-card and configured states, plus a scaffold `harnessHome` so tests never touch a real `~/.dsh` (the provider under test is one whose derived reference cannot collide with a developer's exported keys). The rename touched 239 files (fixtures, goldens, docs, python) in one commit with no compatibility alias. The renderer replacement cost one commit and no wire change: apply semantics, redaction, and the directory join were renderer-agnostic all along. Deferred: a per-row models preview (the picker already lists models), a page address for live routes that never declared configurability, and the documented reset edge — a `settings.replace` cannot re-supply a stored *literal* secret in the replaced subtree, which the reference-based default makes unreachable.

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-web-config-plane.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+# Agent Note：web 配置平面
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-30-web-config-plane.md) | 中文
+
+> 范围：[请求级 LLM 配置 note](2026-07-29-request-level-llm-config-credentials.md) 中延后的 wire 面与 web UI——带推送式失效的 `settings.*`/`credentials.*`/`llm.*` RPC 领域、分层且脱敏的 `describe()`、llm 可配置提供方目录与拓扑事件、独立的 `dsh-client-schema-form` 模型层，以及带手写提供方编辑器的 Models 设置页。`deepseek` → `deepseek-official` 提供方路由重命名作为解锁前提的破坏性变更一并搭车合入。
+
+## 问题
+
+PR1 让 LLM（大语言模型）适配器配置在 seam 层面免重启，但唯一的写入方还是直接编辑 `settings.yaml` 的文本编辑器：web 客户端没有触达设置、凭据或提供方拓扑的任何 wire 通道，「存入密钥、再次发起提示」于是仍意味着离开产品本身。挡住配置页的缺口不是一个，而是三个：`describe()` 只返回合并后的生效值（表单分不清用户覆盖与组合默认值，而且照原样序列化会把 `role('secret')` 的值发到每一个浏览器）；没有任何东西枚举适配器*可以*运行的提供方（裸挂载的 `llm-pi-ai` 在配置之前完全不可见）；两个适配器又都想要 `deepseek` 这个路由键，目录因此无法无歧义地把路由归到拥有它的 namespace 名下。为每个提供方手工维护一份表单被直接否决——schema 已经以 schemastery `Config` 值的形式存在，第二份字段真源注定漂移。
+
+## 决策
+
+**wire 领域挂上编译期 RPC 映射，拒绝落为错误码，失效落为帧。**`settings.describe/update/replace`、`credentials.describe/set/unset`、`llm.providers` 与 `llm.models`（认领预留的 `host.listModels` 面）一同加入 `RpcMethodMap`，七处由编译器锁定的接线位点因此让契约、schema、处理器与客户端保持步调一致。seam 侧的拒绝折叠为 `settings-rejected {ns}`/`credential-rejected {ref}` 业务错误（HTTP 仍只是载体），三个 `HostFrame`——`host/settings-changed {ns}`、`host/credentials-changed {ref}`、`host/models-changed`——沿用 `host/commands-changed` 的形状，因此每个客户端都无需轮询即可收敛。写入与 `pickDirectory`/`openPath` 一起进入连接守卫的特权集合：回环 + 同源，否则 403，因为暴露在局域网上的 dsh web 绝不能接受来自其他源的配置修改。
+
+**`describe()` 增加分层与结构化 secret 脱敏。**`SettingsDescriptor` 在生效值之外携带 `base`/`user`，表单据此按「字段是否出现在用户层」来标记「已覆盖」，而非按值是否不等（与 base *相等*的覆盖仍然是覆盖）。`describe({ redactSecrets: true })`——在每个 wire 面都强制启用——经由对 schema 的纯结构遍历（object/dict/array 容器；secret 角色子树整体是一个不透明叶节点）从全部三层剥除 `role('secret')` 子树，并把剥除的槽位枚举为 `{path, set}`，页面因此不必收到任何值就能渲染只写输入框。
+
+**llm seam 声明可配置性并公布拓扑。**`registerConfigurableProviders()` 是一个全有或全无、以 fiber 为作用域的目录，条目为 `{provider, displayName, settingsNs, settingsPath}`——这正是配置页要为一条可能尚不存在的路由打开正确设置子树时所需要的寻址；`listConfigurableProviders()` 在 wire 处理器里与存活路由合并，未声明的存活路由因此仍报告为激活。零负载的 `'llm/adapters-updated'` 事件从全部四个注册／注销提交点触发，listener 派发带异常隔离（INVARIANT 重抛），沿用 settings/commands 的先例。`llm-deepseek` 的路由重命名为 `deepseek-official`，因为 pi-ai catalog 名正言顺地拥有 `deepseek` 这个聚合器条目；依预发布立场，不设别名。
+
+**架在 schema 模型层之上的手写编辑器。**`dsh-client-schema-form` 把 wire 的 `toJSON()` 信封还原（rehydrate）为活的 schemastery 节点，用于校验、路径解析与不可变草稿编辑——但不做通用渲染：第一版交付了完整的 schema 驱动表单渲染器，得到的却是一个未加样式、把 schema 原样倾倒出来的页面（每个进阶字段都平铺到卡片上、原始字段名直接充当标签、`retryPolicy` 的「不支持」回退落在主流程里）。用户没有再加一套提示／分组系统，而是选择了手写方向，第二轮又把引用输入框整个移除：卡片的主字段是一个 **API 密钥**输入框，未配置密钥的整分节提供方会以其设置卡片的形式打开，收起的「自定义设置」折叠区承载按家族精选的额外字段（两个家族都有 `baseURL`，另加 deepseek 的 `reasoningEffort`／pi-ai 的 `reasoning`），其余每个字段都归 `settings.yaml` 所有。校验仍会在写入前运行还原出的 schema，因此偏离其 schema 的手写字段会在保存时大声失败，而非静默失败。
+
+**Models 页是一次三领域联接，应用语义与 seam 同形。**每一行是一个已配置的提供方；「新增」卡片的选择框是可配置提供方目录中剩余的休眠条目；徽标来自路由存活状态。密钥通道保持引用形态，却从不展示任何引用：键入的密钥经 `credentials.set` **只写**存入 profile 的 `apiKeyEnv` 之下，引用不存在时便派生 `<ROUTE>_API_KEY`（pi-ai profile 会记录该派生），因此 `settings.yaml` 从不携带密钥值，删除所需的整体 `settings.replace` 也绝不可能丢掉兄弟条目的机密。不含删除的编辑以一次最小的 `settings.update` 合并 patch 落地；把折叠区字段清回继承值或删除整行则经 `settings.replace` 替换整个用户分节，因为合并语义表达不了删除。
+
+## 曾考虑的替代方案
+
+- **在 wire 上改发 JSON Schema**——schemastery 的 `toJSON()` 信封能往返保留 `role()`/meta，并还原成客户端为草稿校验本就自带的那个校验器；转换成 JSON Schema 丢掉的恰恰是凭据控件与 secret 脱敏所依赖的角色注解。
+- **通用的 schema 驱动表单渲染器**——先实现、后被替换：如实呈现字段却缺失视觉层级，产出的卡片丑陋且不可用；要把它做好，就意味着构建一套提示词汇（主要／进阶分组、逐字段描述、数组项卡片），成本堪比手写编辑器，却仍无法与任何设计稿完全吻合。今天存在两份 schema（deepseek 的 `Config` 与共享的 pi-ai profile），手写因此就是两套以 namespace 为键的薄布局；漂移风险由保存时的 schema 校验以及未知字段在文档中的原样保留共同约束。
+- **逐字段脱敏机密并在 `replace` 时回填哨兵值**——PR1 的决策（机密是引用）已经为产品默认形态删掉了「存储字面量」这种情况；结构化脱敏加上只写的凭据通道足以处理残余情形，无需让每个写入方都学会一套哨兵协议。
+- **把键入的密钥存成字面 `apiKey` 设置**——v1「单个 API 密钥输入框」的需求本可以把字面量直接写进 profile，但 UI 的每条删除路径都会从*脱敏后的*各层重建用户分节，任何重置或整行删除都会静默丢掉已存储的兄弟密钥；派生引用让输入保持单字段，同时让 `settings.yaml` 不含机密、每一次 replace 都安全。
+- **由 `models` 桥接插件持有提供方配置**——与 PR1 相同的否决理由：按插件划分的 namespace 加上四字段的目录声明已经给了 UI 需要的一切；桥接层的统一字典会把适配器映射那层间接重新引进来。
+- **页面侧轮询而非推送帧**——mux 已经承载 `host/commands-changed`；再加三个帧各自只多一个形状的成本，就让第二个标签页、外部的 `settings.yaml` 编辑和由设置催生的路由都以事件速度收敛。
+
+## 后果
+
+整条闭环以无密钥方式固定在浏览器测试通道（`apps/web/tests/models-settings.e2e.ts`）：「新增」卡片提供休眠的 pi-ai catalog，携键入的密钥添加 `minimax-cn` 会把只含引用的 profile 写入 `settings.yaml`、把密钥值存入 harness 家目录 `.env` 中派生的 `MINIMAX_CN_API_KEY` 之下、路由随拓扑帧注册为存活，「自定义设置」折叠区则把 `reasoning` 合并到引用旁边——全程零模型调用，「新增」卡片态与已配置态各有 ARIA golden，另有脚手架式的 `harnessHome`，测试绝不触碰真实的 `~/.dsh`（受测提供方是派生引用不可能与开发者已导出密钥相撞的那一个）。这次重命名在一次提交中触及 239 个文件（fixture（测试前置数据）、golden、文档、python），未保留兼容别名。替换渲染器只花了一次提交，且没有任何 wire 变更：应用语义、脱敏与目录联接从一开始就与渲染器无关。延后事项：每行的模型预览（选择器已能列出模型）、为从未声明可配置性的存活路由提供页面地址，以及已记录在案的重置边界情形——`settings.replace` 无法在被替换的子树里重新补上已存储的*字面量*机密，而基于引用的默认形态让这种情况根本无从出现。

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-27-glob-sampling.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-27-glob-sampling.md
+2026-07-27-glob-sampling.md: 67912cf290b127a96819d57f30387197af68323d
+2026-07-27-glob-sampling.zh.md: e339a5f87b483849df60feb726b061fe85074300

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-27-glob-sampling.md

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+# Agent Note: Sample over-cap glob results across the tree
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-27-glob-sampling.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+Asked what a workspace contained, an agent described one subfolder as if it were the whole project. The workspace held 22 top-level entries and 11,485 files. `glob {"pattern":"*"}` matched 10,030 paths, but all 100 inline paths sat under one recently unpacked subtree, so the model never saw the other 21 entries.
+
+Three individually valid behaviors composed into the false impression. A glob without `/` matches basenames at any depth, so `*` means every file in the tree rather than the shell's current-directory expansion. Ripgrep's `--sort=modified` is ascending, so an archive's restored old timestamps put that subtree first. The inline page then took the head of that order without saying that it represented only one concentrated slice.
+
+## Decision
+
+A result that fits within `globMaxResults` remains complete and byte-for-byte modification-time ordered. The required `sampleOverCapGlobResults` config has no fallback: `false` retains the modification-time head for an over-cap result, while `true` samples round-robin across the complete result's top-level entries. In sampling mode, every entry receives one slot before any receives a second, exhausted groups drop out, relative order remains stable within each group, and grouping is relative to the actual search root, including an explicit `path`.
+
+In sampling mode, the footer states that the page is a cross-entry sample rather than the modification-time head and reports how many top-level entries it reaches when that fact adds information. When more top-level entries exist than inline slots, it tells the model to narrow `path`. Head mode keeps the ordinary capped-result footer. When spill succeeds, both modes preserve the complete sorted list in the artifact.
+
+The prompt and schema state the configured over-cap ordering, that a pattern without `/` matches at any depth, and that glob returns files, never directory entries. The shipped CLI composition explicitly selects head mode; deployments that want representative capped pages select sampling mode. Directory orientation remains ordinary shell work in deployments that expose the model-facing bash tool: use `ls` for one directory, and glob for a named file-path pattern across the tree. `ctx.fs.listDir` remains an internal provider primitive used by skill discovery; this decision adds no model-facing `list` tool.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**Keep the modification-time head as the only behavior.** Rejected after measuring the failure shape. Some deployments need the stable ordering, but a deployment that values workspace orientation can explicitly select representative data instead of asking the model to distrust the only paths it received.
+
+**Give the sampling choice a default.** Rejected. No product-wide evidence establishes either ordering as the implicit contract, so every composition selects one and misconfiguration fails at load.
+
+**Sample every result.** Rejected. A complete result loses nothing to truncation, so modification-time order remains useful for age-oriented questions. Sampling begins only when the head stops describing the whole.
+
+**Switch to newest-first order.** Rejected. It merely changes which concentrated subtree can dominate and removes the existing oldest-first contract without making a capped page representative.
+
+**Sample only past a skew threshold.** Rejected. No current evidence supports a deployment-wide threshold, and the model could not know which ordering contract applied. The existing cap is the explainable transition.
+
+**Balance recursively below the top level.** Deferred. First-segment balance fixes the observed failure; deeper balancing needs an unsupported depth-versus-breadth policy.
+
+**Add a model-facing `list` tool.** Rejected after implementation review. The default coding composition already exposes general bash and the model understands `ls`; a duplicate tool would add permanent schema/prompt tokens plus ordering, pagination, symlink, escaping, UI, and snapshot contracts without a distinct security or policy benefit. Thin deployments without a model-facing bash tool do not gain directory orientation from this change.
+
+**Reject `*` or silently anchor separator-free patterns.** Rejected. The same basename-at-any-depth behavior makes `*.ts` useful across a tree. Documenting the rule preserves working ripgrep semantics.
+
+## Consequences
+
+A sampling-mode over-cap page no longer answers age-order questions from its inline paths; its footer says so, and the spill artifact retains the complete sorted view. Sampling balances only the first segment beneath the search root, so a deeper hot subtree can still dominate within one top-level entry. Head mode retains the concentration risk as an explicit deployment trade-off.
+
+The tool surface does not grow. Every composition must set `sampleOverCapGlobResults`; changing it alters glob's prompt, schema description, and over-cap Native rendering. The canonical output keeps `root` so sampling mode can recover its grouping basis, while fitting results remain unchanged.
+
+## Testing
+
+Package tests pin the required config, both over-cap modes, their prompt and schema descriptions, concentrated and flat results, explicit roots, more groups than the JavaScript argument limit, exhausted groups, fewer slots than groups, and paths outside the workdir. The `fs-glob-sampling` ACP scenario explicitly enables sampling, boots a minimal real Loader/app/local-bash composition, and executes the real search plugin against a deterministic `rg` process fixture; its result spans four top-level entries instead of returning one subtree's head.

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-27-glob-sampling.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+# Agent Note: 跨目录树采样超出上限的 glob 结果
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-27-glob-sampling.md) | 中文
+
+## 问题
+
+用户询问工作区包含什么内容时，一个 agent（智能体）把某个子文件夹描述成了整个项目。该工作区有 22 个顶层条目和 11,485 个文件。`glob {"pattern":"*"}` 匹配到 10,030 条路径，但内联显示的 100 条路径全部位于一棵近期解压的子树中，因此模型完全没有看到其余 21 个条目。
+
+三个单独看都合理的行为叠加后造成了错误印象。不含 `/` 的 glob 会匹配任意深度的文件名，因此 `*` 表示目录树中的每个文件，而不是 shell 对当前目录执行的展开。Ripgrep 的 `--sort=modified` 按升序排列，因此归档包还原出的旧时间戳会让该子树排在最前。随后，内联页面直接截取这一顺序的前部，却没有说明它只代表集中于一处的切片。
+
+## 决策
+
+未超过 `globMaxResults` 的结果仍保持完整，且按修改时间排序的内容逐字节不变。必填的 `sampleOverCapGlobResults` 配置没有回退值：`false` 会为超过上限的结果保留按修改时间排序的前部，`true` 则会在完整结果的顶层条目之间按轮转方式采样。采样模式下，每个条目都先获得一个位置，之后才有条目获得第二个位置；已经用尽的分组会退出轮转；各组内部的相对顺序保持稳定；分组以实际搜索根为基准，显式指定 `path` 时也如此。
+
+采样模式下，footer 会说明当前页面是跨条目的样本，而不是按修改时间排序的前部；当触达的顶层条目数能提供额外信息时，还会报告该数量。若顶层条目数量超过内联位置数，footer 会要求模型缩小 `path`。保留前部的模式沿用达到上限时的普通 footer。spill 成功时，两种模式都会在该产物中保留完整排序列表。
+
+提示词与 schema 会说明配置所指定的超限结果排序方式、不含 `/` 的模式会匹配任意深度，以及 glob 只返回文件而绝不返回目录条目。随产品交付的 CLI（命令行界面）组合显式选择保留前部的模式；希望达到上限的页面具有代表性的部署则选择采样模式。在向模型暴露 bash 工具的部署中，目录定位仍由普通 shell 操作完成：查看一个目录使用 `ls`，跨目录树按指定文件路径模式查找则使用 glob。skill（技能）发现流程仍将 `ctx.fs.listDir` 作为内部提供方原语使用；本决策不会新增面向模型的 `list` 工具。
+
+## 考虑过的替代方案
+
+**只保留按修改时间排序的前部。** 测量实际故障形态后否决。某些部署需要这种稳定排序；但重视工作区定位的部署可以显式选择具有代表性的数据，而不必要求模型怀疑自己拿到的唯一一批路径。
+
+**为采样选项提供默认值。** 否决。没有全产品范围的证据支持把任一排序作为隐式契约，因此每个组合都必须选择一种，配置错误则在加载时失败。
+
+**对所有结果采样。** 否决。完整结果没有因截断损失任何信息，因此按修改时间排序仍有助于回答关注新旧时间的问题。只有当截取前部已经无法描述整体时，才开始采样。
+
+**改为最新优先排序。** 否决。这只会改变哪一棵结果集中的子树可能占据主导；既取消了现有的最旧优先契约，也没有让受限页面更具代表性。
+
+**仅在偏斜超过阈值时采样。** 否决。目前没有证据支持适用于所有部署的统一阈值，模型也无法判断当前采用的是哪一种排序契约。现有上限是可以清楚解释的切换点。
+
+**在顶层以下递归平衡。** 暂缓。按第一路径段做平衡已经修复观测到的故障；更深层的平衡需要一套尚无依据的深度与广度取舍策略。
+
+**新增面向模型的 `list` 工具。** 实现评审后否决。默认编程组合已经提供通用 bash，模型也理解 `ls`；重复工具会永久增加 schema 与提示词所占的 token，并引入排序、分页、符号链接、转义、UI 与快照契约，却没有独立的安全或策略收益。不向模型提供 bash 工具的精简部署也不会因本次改动获得目录定位能力。
+
+**拒绝 `*`，或在不含分隔符的模式前静默加上根目录锚点。** 否决。同样的「在任意深度匹配文件名」行为使 `*.ts` 可以有效地跨目录树搜索。记录这条规则能够保留正常工作的 Ripgrep 语义。
+
+## 影响
+
+采样模式下，超过上限的 glob 页面无法再根据内联路径回答按时间判断新旧的问题；footer 会明确说明这一点，spill 产物仍保留完整的排序视图。采样只平衡搜索根下的第一路径段，因此某个顶层条目内部较深处、结果密集的子树仍可能占据主导。保留前部的模式则把集中风险作为显式部署取舍保留下来。
+
+工具接口不会扩大。每个组合都必须设置 `sampleOverCapGlobResults`；更改该值会改变 glob 的提示词、schema 描述以及超过上限时的 Native 渲染。规范输出保留 `root`，以便采样模式恢复其分组基准；未超过上限的结果保持不变。
+
+## 测试
+
+包测试锁定了必填配置、两种超过上限模式及其提示词和 schema 描述、结果集中与扁平两种情况、显式根目录、分组数超过 JavaScript 参数个数上限、分组耗尽、位置数少于分组数，以及工作目录以外的路径。`fs-glob-sampling` ACP（Agent Client Protocol）场景会显式启用采样，启动最小化的真实 Loader/app/local-bash 组合，并让真实搜索插件对接确定性的 `rg` 进程 fixture（测试前置数据）；其结果覆盖 4 个顶层条目，而不是只返回某棵子树的前部。

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-30-approval-panel-command-cap.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-30-approval-panel-command-cap.md
+2026-07-30-approval-panel-command-cap.md: 941f7eda187f263f2d8af6aa643d493c92a3669b
+2026-07-30-approval-panel-command-cap.zh.md: 939a700934f6467947028d988da9a694169e203e

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-30-approval-panel-command-cap.md

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+# Agent Note: The approval takeover shares the composer's text cap
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-30-approval-panel-command-cap.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+The approval panel is a composer takeover: while a sandbox escalation waits, it replaces the InputBar in the composer seat with the model's justification, the paired command, and a refuse/allow row. Both texts are unbounded model output, and the card had no height cap. A long command — the realistic shape, since escalation happens on the command the sandbox just denied, and a denied command is often a long inline write — grew the card until the action row left the viewport. The user could read the request and not answer it: the buttons existed, off screen, in a sticky footer that had already used the whole column.
+
+The InputBar the panel replaces has always been capped (14 lines, then the textarea scrolls), so the takeover was also the one composer state that could grow without limit — the seat's height jumped on election and jumped back on answer.
+
+## Decision
+
+The panel's justification and command move into one scroll region (`data-approval-scroll`) capped at the same height as the composer's draft area; the amber strip and the action row sit outside it, so both buttons are in the card at every content length.
+
+The cap is one value with two consumers, declared as `--dsh-composer-text-max-height: 336px` on `ConversationRoot`'s `.composerSeat` — the composer chain's only shared ancestor, since the fallback InputBar and an elected takeover render as siblings. `InputBar`'s mirror and the panel's scroll region both read it, so the seat cannot cap its two states differently: what the designer asked for ("unify it with the input box's max height") is now a fact of the stylesheet rather than a number repeated in two files. The region is `box-sizing: border-box` so the cap is its outer height, the same box the composer's draft area occupies.
+
+The region is a tab stop (`tabIndex={0}`, named `role="group"`). Unlike the question composer's scroll body, whose option rows are focusable and pull the container along, this one holds nothing but text: without its own tab stop a keyboard-only user could reach the buttons and never the command's tail, and approve what they could not finish reading.
+
+The panel's card rebinds `--dsh-scrollbar-thumb{,-hover}` to the l2 pair, as every scrolling surface on an elevated background must ([scrollbar contract](../../../../packages/client/ui-theme/src/styles/scrollbar.css)).
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**Cap the whole card instead of the text region.** One declaration, no restructuring, and it reads as the literal "same max height as the input box". Rejected because the card holds the strip and the action row: at 336px total the justification and command would get ~250px, less room than the draft they replace, and the numbers would only agree by coincidence of the strip's height. Capping the text region makes both seats top out at the same text height, which is the property that keeps the footer from jumping.
+
+**Cap against the viewport like the question composer (`min(60vh, 520px)`).** The sibling takeover already does this, so it is the local precedent. Rejected because the designer's request was parity with the InputBar, and the two takeovers are not the same shape: the question composer's scroll content is a list of options the user must compare, which wants as much viewport as it can get, while the approval panel's is one command the user skims before deciding. A viewport-relative cap would also make the seat's height jump on election again, in the other direction.
+
+**Ellipsize or truncate the command.** No scroll region, no cap, and the buttons stay put. Rejected because the command is the thing being approved: hiding its tail asks the user to consent to text they cannot read. Truncation is also unrecoverable here — the panel is the whole approval UI, so there is no "show more" surface to fall back to.
+
+**Leave the action row inside the scroll region and cap the region.** Fewer moving parts than pinning the row. Rejected because it reproduces the defect inside the card: the buttons scroll out of the region, and the user has to discover a scrollbar to reach them.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- A long command scrolls inside the card and the refuse/allow buttons stay on screen. Measured on the built client at 900x1000 and 900x700: the region reports `scrollHeight` past `clientHeight`, and both buttons stay inside the card and inside the viewport.
+- Electing the takeover no longer changes how tall the composer seat can get, so the transcript above it does not reflow by hundreds of pixels when an approval arrives or resolves.
+- The InputBar's 14-line cap now resolves through a custom property inherited from `.composerSeat`. Rendering the bar outside that seat would drop the declaration (an unresolved `var()` with no fallback), so a future composer host has to carry the property — which is why it is declared on the shared seat rather than the app root.
+- The scenario's recorded command is a 200-token blob, far longer than a round trip needs. That cost is deliberate: the cap is unfalsifiable without content that passes it, and the model compresses any regular payload (the first recording turned "alpha 400 times" into `printf 'alpha %.0s' {1..400}`, a one-line command that proves nothing).
+
+## Verification
+
+`apps/web/tests/approval-composer.e2e.ts` drives the real composition: a read-only session, a denied write, the model's escalation retry, and the answer clicked through the panel. The geometry assertion runs on the live panel at two viewport heights and is guarded against holding vacuously — the region must actually be scrolling, and the measured cap must equal the composer's own, which the test reads off the live textarea before sending rather than hardcoding the px value.
+
+Confirmed both directions against the built client. With the cap reverted, the region reports `scrolls: false` and grows to the command's full height (1798px for the recorded blob at 900x1000, against 336px capped); at 900x700 the card is 680px tall against a 700px viewport and the action row's bottom lands at y=749 — below the fold, the designer's report exactly. With the cap restored the scenario passes in replay.
+
+Reproducing the off-screen buttons needs a card taller than the scrollport, not merely a tall card. The composer seat is `position: sticky; bottom: 0`, so while the card still fits it stays pinned to the viewport bottom and the buttons remain visible — at 900x1000 the uncapped card ate the whole transcript yet kept its action row on screen. Only once the card outgrows the scrollport does sticky stop being able to hold the bottom edge, and the row goes under.
+
+The geometry block and the golden are replay-only, so record mode reaches the fixture write instead of aborting on layout.
+
+The scenario keeps exactly one golden — the waiting panel — and asserts the answered state on the world instead (the decided outcome, the file the escalated command wrote, `DONE`, the panel gone, the composer re-enabled). An answered-transcript golden was recorded first and failed on Linux CI: the denied first attempt renders the OS's own refusal, and that text is platform-specific (`bash: notes.txt: Operation not permitted` on macOS against `bash: line 1: notes.txt: Read-only file system` on Linux). Any scenario whose transcript contains a sandbox-denied command inherits that, so the denial belongs in assertions, never in a golden.
+
+The panel ships as a client-module bundle: `pnpm run build:web` alone does not pick up a change to `ApprovalPanel.module.css` or a new `data-` hook in `ApprovalPanel.tsx` — the package build must run first, or the browser lane asserts against an older client than the tree.

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-30-approval-panel-command-cap.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+# Agent Note: 审批接管面板与输入框共用同一文本高度上限
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-30-approval-panel-command-cap.md) | 中文
+
+## 问题
+
+审批面板是一次 composer 接管：当一次沙箱越权申请处于等待状态时，它在 composer 容器中取代 InputBar，展示模型给出的理由、与之配对的命令，以及一行拒绝／允许按钮。这两段文本都是长度不受限的模型输出，而卡片当时没有任何高度上限。命令一长——而这正是现实中的常见形态，因为越权申请针对的就是沙箱刚刚拒绝的那条命令，而被拒绝的命令往往是一次很长的内联写入——卡片就会一直变高，直到操作按钮行离开视口。用户能读到这次申请，却无法回应它：按钮存在，只是在屏幕之外，位于一个已经占满整列的吸底容器里。
+
+被它取代的 InputBar 一直是有上限的（14 行，之后由 textarea 自行滚动），因此这次接管也是 composer 唯一一个可以无限增高的状态——被选中时容器高度骤增，回应之后又骤降。
+
+## 决策
+
+面板的理由与命令移入同一个滚动区域（`data-approval-scroll`），其高度上限与 composer 的草稿区完全相同；琥珀色状态条与操作按钮行位于该区域之外，因此无论内容多长，两个按钮都留在卡片内。
+
+这个上限是一个值、两个消费者，以 `--dsh-composer-text-max-height: 336px` 声明在 `ConversationRoot` 的 `.composerSeat` 上——它是 composer 链唯一的共同祖先，因为兜底的 InputBar 与被选中的接管面板是兄弟节点。`InputBar` 的 mirror 与面板的滚动区域都读取它，于是同一个容器不可能给它的两种状态设出不同上限：设计同学要求的"可以跟输入框最大高度统一"，如今是样式表中的一个事实，而不是抄在两个文件里的一个数字。该区域取 `box-sizing: border-box`，因此上限指的是它的外框高度，与 composer 草稿区占据的是同一个盒子。
+
+该区域自身是一个 Tab 停靠点（`tabIndex={0}`，带名称的 `role="group"`）。提问 composer 的滚动体不需要这样做——它的选项行本身可聚焦，会把容器一起带过去；而这里除文本之外别无内容：没有自己的停靠点，仅用键盘的用户能走到按钮却走不到命令尾部，于是可能批准了自己没读完的东西。
+
+面板卡片把 `--dsh-scrollbar-thumb{,-hover}` 重新绑定到 l2 那一对，这是每一个位于高层表面上的滚动区域都必须做的（[滚动条约定](../../../../packages/client/ui-theme/src/styles/scrollbar.css)）。
+
+## 曾考虑的替代方案
+
+**给整张卡片设上限，而不是给文本区域设。** 一条声明，不需要重构结构，而且它读起来就是字面意义上的"与输入框相同的最大高度"。之所以否决：卡片还装着状态条和操作按钮行——总高 336px 时，理由与命令只能分到约 250px，比它们所取代的草稿区更矮，而且两边数字能对上纯属状态条高度的巧合。给文本区域设上限，才能让两种状态在同一文本高度处收住，而这正是让底部不再跳动的那条性质。
+
+**像提问 composer 那样按视口设上限（`min(60vh, 520px)`）。** 同为接管面板的兄弟组件已经这么做了，因此这是本地既有先例。之所以否决：设计同学的要求是与 InputBar 对齐，而两个接管面板形态并不相同——提问 composer 的滚动内容是一组需要用户互相比较的选项，能占多少视口就该占多少；审批面板的滚动内容则是一条命令，用户在决定之前扫读即可。按视口设上限还会让容器高度在被选中时再次跳动，只是方向相反。
+
+**对命令做省略号或截断处理。** 不需要滚动区域，不需要上限，按钮也不会移位。之所以否决：命令正是被审批的对象，隐去它的尾部等于要求用户为自己读不到的文本背书。在这里截断还是不可恢复的——面板就是审批的全部界面，没有"展开更多"的落脚处。
+
+**把操作按钮行留在滚动区域内，只给该区域设上限。** 比把按钮行固定住少动几处。之所以否决：这会把缺陷搬进卡片内部——按钮滚出该区域，用户得先发现有滚动条才能碰到它们。
+
+## 后果
+
+- 长命令在卡片内滚动，拒绝／允许按钮留在屏幕内。在构建产物客户端上于 900x1000 与 900x700 实测：该区域报告的 `scrollHeight` 超过 `clientHeight`，两个按钮都留在卡片内、也都留在视口内。
+- 选中接管面板不再改变 composer 容器能达到的高度，因此审批到来或解决时，上方的会话流不会有数百像素的重排。
+- InputBar 的 14 行上限现在通过一个自 `.composerSeat` 继承而来的自定义属性解析。把输入栏渲染到该容器之外会丢掉这条声明（一个没有兜底值的未解析 `var()`），因此未来的 composer 宿主必须带上这个属性——这也正是它声明在共享容器上、而不是应用根节点上的原因。
+- 该场景录制的命令是一段 200 个 token 的字符块，远超一次往返所需。这个代价是有意付出的：没有能越过上限的内容，这个上限无法被证伪，而模型会把任何规整的载荷压缩掉（第一次录制时，模型把"alpha 重复 400 次"写成了 `printf 'alpha %.0s' {1..400}`，一条什么也证明不了的单行命令）。
+
+## 验证
+
+`apps/web/tests/approval-composer.e2e.ts` 驱动的是真实组合：一个只读会话、一次被拒绝的写入、模型的越权重试，以及在面板上点击完成的回应。几何断言在两个视口高度上针对活动面板执行，并有守卫防止它空洞地成立——该区域必须确实处在滚动状态，且实测上限必须等于 composer 自身的上限，后者由测试在发送之前从活动 textarea 上读出，而不是把该像素值写死。
+
+在构建产物客户端上双向确认过。撤销上限后，该区域报告 `scrolls: false`，并长到命令的完整高度（900x1000 下，录制的字符块为 1798px，而设上限后为 336px）；在 900x700 下卡片高 680px、视口高 700px，操作按钮行底边落在 y=749——正在折叠之下，与设计同学的反馈完全一致。恢复上限后，该场景在回放模式下通过。
+
+要复现按钮跑到屏幕外，需要的是比滚动视口更高的卡片，而不只是一张很高的卡片。composer 容器为 `position: sticky; bottom: 0`，因此在卡片尚能容纳时它会一直吸附在视口底部，按钮仍然可见——在 900x1000 下，未设上限的卡片吃掉了整个会话流，却仍把操作按钮行留在屏幕内。只有当卡片长过滚动视口，sticky 才再也无法守住底边，按钮行随之沉入折叠之下。
+
+几何断言块与 golden 仅在回放模式下执行，这样录制模式才能走到写入 fixture 那一步，而不是在布局检查处中断。
+
+该场景只保留一份 golden —— 等待中的面板；回应之后的状态改为对世界作断言（决策结果、越权命令写出的那个文件、`DONE`、面板消失、输入框重新可用）。最初还录了一份"已回应会话流"的 golden，它在 Linux CI 上失败了：第一次被拒绝的尝试渲染的是操作系统自己的拒绝文本，而这段文本因平台而异（macOS 为 `bash: notes.txt: Operation not permitted`，Linux 为 `bash: line 1: notes.txt: Read-only file system`）。任何会话流中含有被沙箱拒绝命令的场景都会继承这一点，因此这类拒绝只能进断言，绝不能进 golden。
+
+该面板以客户端模组包的形式发布：单跑 `pnpm run build:web` 不会带上对 `ApprovalPanel.module.css` 的改动，也不会带上 `ApprovalPanel.tsx` 中新增的 `data-` 钩子——必须先执行包构建，否则浏览器测试通道会对着一个比工作树更旧的客户端做断言。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-30-session-store-fork-api.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-30-session-store-fork-api.md
-2026-06-30-session-store-fork-api.md: 5342deba8ca879026d32ee1420cb3c0fdf67c500
-2026-06-30-session-store-fork-api.zh.md: 51a3e0ce50aff10a9812c91d24dc6e78a56c43ba
+2026-06-30-session-store-fork-api.md: 69ff85e1f137f4f263bf951af0a3f655411c606a
+2026-06-30-session-store-fork-api.zh.md: 3304a6f384c9004b3572c95881f832a4aa21b77c

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-30-session-store-fork-api.md

@@ -28,6 +28,12 @@ class SessionStore extends Service {
 
 An empty prefix is forkable; any non-empty boundary must be a safe existing sequence outside an open turn. Typed errors distinguish missing sources, stale objects, duplicate child ids, invalid boundaries, and prefixes ending during execution. Broader log validation and crash repair remain with their existing owners.
 
+### Host and browser adaptation
+
+The Host `session.fork` RPC accepts `atSeq` as an anchor within the desired turn rather than as the store's inclusive safe boundary. It selects the first `turn/end` at or after that anchor; an omitted or past-end anchor selects the last completed turn. An anchor already in the log but not followed by a matching `turn/end` returns `fork-unavailable` and never falls back to an earlier turn, so a message action cannot silently omit the clicked message.
+
+The Host creates the child through the agent registry with the selected seed and lineage, and pre-publication setup installs the latest logged provider, model, and reasoning target before the child can run. It then attaches the child to the source Workspace. An attachment failure returns `workspace-attach-failed` with the already-published child id; the client reconciles that child into its summary list before surfacing the error. The Session-row action uses the last completed turn, while a message action supplies its event seq; both open the child after success, and lineage expansion makes it visible beneath the source.
+
 ## Alternatives considered
 
 **Separate `ctx.sessionFork` service.** This was the first implementation, but review showed it overfit the capability-seam pattern. The code had no swappable backend, no extra event surface, no independent ownership lifecycle, and no durable behavior beyond `ctx.sessions.create({ seed, meta })`. Keeping a separate package would make callers discover and install a second service just to perform policy around a session-store primitive.
@@ -40,4 +46,4 @@ An empty prefix is forkable; any non-empty boundary must be a safe existing sequ
 
 The public surface stays small and discoverable: live session branching is part of `ctx.sessions`, next to `create({ seed })`, rather than a standalone service or a two-step helper pair. Persistence continues to work through existing `session/created` and `session/flush` behavior: a forked child starts life with seeded events, so existing backends persist that seed once and preserve `parentSession` / `seedLength` in the header.
 
-The v1 scope still excludes ACP `session/fork`, unloaded persisted-session forking, model-facing tools, and subagent refactors. If a future ACP method is added, it should advertise the capability only after it has protocol and snapshot coverage; this Agent Note adds no ACP wire behavior, so no ACP snapshot is required. Fork-child replay remains covered by the existing [seed-boundary testing Agent Note](../testing/2026-06-22-fork-child-replay-seed-boundary.md), while this API gets focused `dsh-session` unit tests plus JSONL persistence coverage.
+The v1 scope still excludes ACP `session/fork`, unloaded persisted-session forking, model-facing tools, and subagent refactors. If a future ACP method is added, it should advertise the capability only after it has protocol and snapshot coverage; this Agent Note adds no ACP wire behavior, so no ACP snapshot is required. Fork-child replay remains covered by the existing [seed-boundary testing Agent Note](../testing/2026-06-22-fork-child-replay-seed-boundary.md); focused store, Host, carrier, and client tests pin the boundary and reconciliation contracts, while the real Chromium scenario pins the assembled message action and lineage tree.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-30-session-store-fork-api.zh.md

@@ -28,6 +28,12 @@ class SessionStore extends Service {
 
 空前缀可以被 fork；任何非空边界都必须是位于开放轮次之外且安全、已存在的序号。类型化的错误区分源缺失、对象陈旧、子 id 重复、边界无效和前缀结束于执行过程中等情况。更广泛的日志校验与崩溃恢复仍由其现有的负责方处理。
 
+### Host 与浏览器适配
+
+Host 的 `session.fork` RPC 接受 `atSeq`，并将其视为所需轮次内的锚点，而非 store 中包含该序号的安全边界。它选择该锚点处或其后的首个 `turn/end`；锚点省略或超过末尾时，选择最后一个已完成轮次。若锚点已在日志中，但从该锚点起找不到匹配的 `turn/end`，则返回 `fork-unavailable`，绝不回退到更早的轮次，因此消息操作不会静默遗漏所点击的消息。
+
+Host 通过 agent（智能体）注册表，以选定的种子和谱系创建子会话；发布前 setup 会先安装日志中最新的提供方、模型和推理（reasoning）目标，子会话才能运行。随后，Host 将子会话附加到源 Workspace。若附加失败，则返回 `workspace-attach-failed` 及已发布的子会话 id；客户端先将该子会话对账到摘要列表，再向调用方报告错误。Session 行操作使用最后一个已完成轮次，消息操作则提供其事件 seq；两者都会在成功后打开子会话，展开谱系后可在源会话下看到它。
+
 ## 曾考虑的替代方案
 
 **独立的 `ctx.sessionFork` 服务。** 这是最初的实现，但评审表明它过度套用了 capability-seam 模式。代码没有可替换的后端、没有额外的事件面、没有独立的所有权生命周期，也没有超出 `ctx.sessions.create({ seed, meta })` 的持久化行为。保留独立包会迫使调用方为了在会话存储原语之上执行一层策略而去发现并安装第二个服务。
@@ -40,4 +46,4 @@ class SessionStore extends Service {
 
 公开接口保持精简且易于发现：活跃会话分支是 `ctx.sessions` 的一部分，紧邻 `create({ seed })`，而非一个独立服务或一对两步辅助函数。持久化继续通过现有的 `session/created` 和 `session/flush` 行为运作：fork 出的子会话以种子事件开始生命，因此现有后端只需持久化该种子一次，并在 header 中保存 `parentSession`／`seedLength`。
 
-v1 范围仍然排除 ACP（Agent Client Protocol） `session/fork`、对未加载的已持久化会话的 fork、面向模型的工具，以及 subagent 重构。如果未来添加 ACP 方法，应在具备协议与快照覆盖后才广播该能力；本 Agent Note 不添加任何 ACP 协议行为，因此不需要 ACP 快照。fork 子会话的回放仍由现有的[种子边界测试 Agent Note](../testing/2026-06-22-fork-child-replay-seed-boundary.md) 覆盖，而本 API 则获得专门的 `dsh-session` 单元测试加 JSONL 持久化覆盖。
+v1 范围仍然排除 ACP（Agent Client Protocol） `session/fork`、对未加载的已持久化会话的 fork、面向模型的工具，以及 subagent 重构。如果未来添加 ACP 方法，应在具备协议与快照覆盖后才广播该能力；本 Agent Note 不添加任何 ACP 协议行为，因此不需要 ACP 快照。fork 子会话的回放仍由现有的[种子边界测试 Agent Note](../testing/2026-06-22-fork-child-replay-seed-boundary.md) 覆盖；store、Host、载体与客户端的专项测试固定边界和对账契约，真实 Chromium 场景则固定组装后的消息操作与谱系树。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.i18n.yaml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
-#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
-2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.md: 586995bf459aeaee88672863977f7acf2a7061a3
-2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.zh.md: 432d5167a57d30bc04a0b4faf213e4341f07bd2f
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.md
+2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.md: 831aa53e532a75392690c330837482bb0f9c32b1
+2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.zh.md: 9ad074d59c13585aa4fca46ae4d40e2deb15cde6

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.md

@@ -12,14 +12,14 @@ Two existing mechanisms stood in the way. First, the host durably promoted the a
 
 ## Decision
 
-### Flat view and viewing state
+### Flat rows and viewing state
 
-The group-by menu offers two modes, WorkSpace / In one list. Flat mode renders every session (fork children included) as a top-level row, strictly newest-first by `updatedAt`, with no parent/child adjacency; the Intent placeholder renders as the first row. The mode choice persists in the browser (`dsh.workspace.view`) across reloads.
+The group-by menu offers two modes, WorkSpace / In one list. WorkSpace mode renders peer session rows within each group in the manual order from `WorkspaceView.sessionIds`; In one list combines every session and sorts them strictly newest-first by `updatedAt`. Neither mode projects `parentId` into a list hierarchy; fork lineage remains session data only. [Web session fork actions](2026-07-27-web-session-fork-actions.md) define the complete fork behavior. The mode choice persists in the browser (`dsh.workspace.view`) across reloads.
 
 ### Row interactions
 
 - Session rows show a detail card after a 500ms hover dwell (full title / relative time / status line; the status line has only running/idle until the wire grows a status field). The card and the row menu are mutually exclusive: no card while a menu is open or a drag is in flight.
-- Session-row … menu: Rename / Fork session / Delete session, visual-only this iteration; workspace-header … menu: Rename (wired) / Delete workspace (visual-only). Menus close when the pointer leaves them.
+- Session-row … menu: Rename / Fork session / Delete session; Rename and Fork are wired, while Delete remains visual-only. The workspace-header … menu's Rename / Delete workspace actions are both wired. Menus close when the pointer leaves them.
 - Supporting primitives: `Menu` gains label entries, danger rows, and `closeOnPointerLeave`; a new `HoverCard` (portaled placement, open delay, disabled guard).
 
 ### workspace.rename
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ The group-by menu offers two modes, WorkSpace / In one list. Flat mode renders e
 
 The `session/event` → `touchSession` activity-pinning chain is deleted wholesale; the workspace account order is now manually owned — new sessions prepend at attach, and explicit reordering goes through `workspace.insertSessionBefore({ workspaceId, sessionId, beforeSessionId? })` (DOM insertBefore semantics: with an anchor it inserts before it, omitted appends to the end). The entity throws a typed `WorkspaceMoveInvalidError` only for unaccounted session/anchor ids; the handler maps exactly that to the business code `workspace-move-invalid`, while storage failures stay internal.
 
-The UI is HTML5 drag on root rows inside a group (workspace grouping only, outside search; fork children ride with their parent and are not draggable). Order authority stays entirely host-side: drop only sends the RPC, the client performs zero local reordering, and the view refreshes from the response upsert and the changed frame; a failed move changes nothing. The client's upsert rejects snapshots older (`updatedAt`) than the installed projection so a late unary response cannot roll back a newer frame.
+The UI is HTML5 drag on session rows inside a group (workspace grouping only, outside search; fork children and their source sessions are ordered independently). Order authority stays entirely host-side: drop only sends the RPC, the client performs zero local reordering, and the view refreshes from the response upsert and the changed frame; a failed move changes nothing. The client's upsert rejects snapshots older (`updatedAt`) than the installed projection so a late unary response cannot roll back a newer frame.
 
 ### Shell/region split
 
@@ -46,15 +46,15 @@ ui-sidebar shrinks to the column-geometry shell: brand row, fold state machine,
 
 **Keep the rename dialog in ui-sidebar (smallest change)** — that is the problem itself: workspace-domain dialogs scattered in a borrowed slot, with each addition (the Delete confirmation is coming) repeating the cross-package wiring. Review first considered moving only the rename modal; the ruling was to give the whole browsing region to ui-workspace and leave the shell geometry-only.
 
-**Keep parent/child adjacency in flat mode** — contradicts strict recency (a child newer than its parent's sibling cannot slot adjacently), and the flat view's purpose is dropping the hierarchy; flattening fully and disabling drag in flat mode (no persistence carrier) is more consistent.
+**Nest sessions by fork lineage in WorkSpace mode** — nesting makes the current child visible only while its ancestors are expanded and limits in-group manual ordering to root nodes; `parentId` is lineage data, not a list-navigation structure. Flattening all sessions into peer rows lets each row be opened, searched, and ordered independently; In one list still disables drag because it has no workspace persistence carrier.
 
 ## Consequences
 
 - Manual order is the sole authority over the workspace account: an order the user arranges is never scrambled by activity; the cost is losing float-to-top-on-activity, whose signal now rides the row status dot and time label. The `WorkspaceView.sessionIds` wire contract is reworded to the manual-order semantics.
 - The two-fact shell/region contract funnels every future workspace-domain feature (Delete confirmation, cross-group moves, Ungrouped adoption) into the single ui-workspace package; ui-sidebar no longer evolves with session-list features.
 - Flat mode supports neither reordering nor a create-in-workspace entry point (switching back to grouped view is required) — an accepted scope reduction.
-- Wiring the three session-menu items and workspace Delete, and growing the wire status enum, remain future iterations.
+- Wiring session Delete and growing the wire status enum remain future iterations.
 
 ## Testing
 
-Package-level suites cover the derivations (deriveGroups/deriveFlat), row components, both apply registrations and passthroughs, host entity move semantics, and the rename/insertSessionBefore RPC implementations with their fixture stubs; the `apps/web` keyless snapshots regress the assembled application; delivery acceptance additionally runs a 12-item playwright (chromium headless) checklist (grouped default, flat switch and persistence, hover-card appearance and suppression, both menus, the full rename chain, drag persistence) and drives the real host over the wire for rename success / duplicate rejection / `workspace-move-invalid`.
+Package-level suites cover the derivations (deriveGroups/deriveFlat), peer session rows, both apply registrations and passthroughs, host entity move semantics, and the rename/insertSessionBefore RPC implementations with their fixture stubs; the `apps/web` keyless snapshots regress the assembled application and pin that a fork does not introduce session expansion controls.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.zh.md

@@ -12,14 +12,14 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## Decision
 
-### 平铺视图与浏览态
+### 平铺行与浏览态
 
-group-by 菜单提供 WorkSpace / In one list 两种模式。平铺模式把所有 session(含 fork 子)一律作为顶层行,严格按 `updatedAt` 新→旧排序,不保持父子相邻;Intent 占位行渲染在列表首行。模式选择持久化在浏览器(`dsh.workspace.view`),刷新保持。
+group-by 菜单提供 WorkSpace / In one list 两种模式。WorkSpace 模式按 `WorkspaceView.sessionIds` 的手动序在各组内展示同级 session 行；In one list 把所有 session 合并后严格按 `updatedAt` 新→旧排序。两种模式都不把 `parentId` 投影成列表层级，fork 谱系只保留为 session 数据；完整 fork 行为由 [Web session fork 操作](2026-07-27-web-session-fork-actions.md)定义。模式选择持久化在浏览器(`dsh.workspace.view`),刷新保持。
 
 ### 行交互
 
 - session 行悬停 500ms 出详情卡(全名/相对时间/状态行;状态本期只有 running/idle 两态,枚举扩展待 wire 增补 status 字段)。卡片与行菜单互斥:菜单开启或拖拽进行中不出卡。
-- session 行 … 菜单:Rename / Fork session / Delete session,本期纯视觉;workspace 组头 … 菜单:Rename(已接线)/ Delete workspace(纯视觉)。菜单鼠标移出即关。
+- session 行 … 菜单:Rename / Fork session / Delete session，其中 Rename 与 Fork 已接线，Delete 仍为纯视觉；workspace 组头 … 菜单的 Rename / Delete workspace 均已接线。菜单鼠标移出即关。
 - 支撑件:`Menu` 新增 label 条目、danger 行、`closeOnPointerLeave`;新增 `HoverCard`(portal 定位、开启延时、disabled 守卫)。
 
 ### workspace.rename
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ group-by 菜单提供 WorkSpace / In one list 两种模式。平铺模式把所
 
 `session/event` → `touchSession` 活动置顶链整体删除;workspace 账本序改为纯手动拥有——新 session attach 时前插,显式重排走 `workspace.insertSessionBefore({ workspaceId, sessionId, beforeSessionId? })`(DOM insertBefore 语义:锚给了插锚前,缺省 append 到末尾)。实体只对不在账的 session/锚抛类型化的 `WorkspaceMoveInvalidError`,handler 仅把它映射为业务码 `workspace-move-invalid`,存储故障保持 internal。
 
-UI 为组内 root 行的 HTML5 拖拽(仅 workspace 分组、非搜索态;fork 子随父不单独拖)。顺序权威完全在 host:drop 只发 RPC,client 零本地重排,视图靠响应体 upsert 与 changed 帧刷新;失败即无事发生。client 的 upsert 拒绝比已装载投影更旧(`updatedAt`)的快照,防迟到的一元响应回滚更新的帧。
+UI 为组内 session 行的 HTML5 拖拽(仅 workspace 分组、非搜索态；fork 子与源会话一样独立排序)。顺序权威完全在 host:drop 只发 RPC,client 零本地重排,视图靠响应体 upsert 与 changed 帧刷新;失败即无事发生。client 的 upsert 拒绝比已装载投影更旧(`updatedAt`)的快照,防迟到的一元响应回滚更新的帧。
 
 ### 壳/区域切分
 
@@ -46,15 +46,15 @@ ui-sidebar 缩为列几何壳:品牌行、折叠状态机、New Session、Settin
 
 **rename 对话框留在 ui-sidebar(最小改动)** —— 正是问题本身:workspace 域的对话框散落在借来的坑里,每加一个(Delete 确认框将至)都重演跨包接线。评审中先议了「只挪 rename Modal」的中间态,最终裁定整个浏览区域归 ui-workspace,壳只留几何。
 
-**平铺模式保持父子相邻成组** —— 与「严格按时间」矛盾(子新于兄则插不进相邻位),且平铺本意就是取消层级;拉平并禁用平铺下的拖拽(无持久化载体)更一致。
+**WorkSpace 模式按 fork 谱系嵌套 session** —— 嵌套会让当前子会话依赖祖先展开态才能可见，也让组内手动序只能移动根节点；`parentId` 是 lineage 数据，不是列表导航结构。所有 session 拍平成同级行后，每行都可独立打开、搜索与排序；In one list 仍因没有 workspace 持久化载体而禁用拖拽。
 
 ## Consequences
 
 - 手动序是唯一的 workspace 账本序权威:用户排好的顺序不再被活动打乱;代价是「最近活跃浮到最上」的行为消失,活跃感知转由行内状态点与时间标签承担。`WorkspaceView.sessionIds` 的 wire 契约随之改为手动序措辞。
 - 壳/区域两事实契约把 workspace 域的后续功能(Delete 确认、跨组移动、Ungrouped 收编)全部收进 ui-workspace 单包;ui-sidebar 不再随 session 列表功能演进。
 - 平铺模式不支持排序与分组入口(建到指定 workspace 需切回分组视图),是拍板接受的范围收窄。
-- session 菜单三项与 workspace Delete 的功能接线、状态枚举扩 wire,留待后续迭代。
+- session Delete 的功能接线与状态枚举扩 wire,留待后续迭代。
 
 ## Testing
 
-包级用例覆盖派生(deriveGroups/deriveFlat)、行组件、两处 apply 注册与透传、host 实体移位语义、rename/insertSessionBefore 的 RPC 实现与 fixture 桩;`apps/web` keyless snapshot 回归覆盖装配后的应用;交付验收另以 playwright(chromium headless)过 12 项清单(分组默认、平铺切换与持久化、hover 卡出现与抑制、双菜单、rename 全链、拖拽落盘),并对真 host 直打 wire 验证 rename 成功/重名拒绝/`workspace-move-invalid` 三径。
+包级用例覆盖派生(deriveGroups/deriveFlat)、同级 session 行、两处 apply 注册与透传、host 实体移位语义、rename/insertSessionBefore 的 RPC 实现与 fixture 桩；`apps/web` keyless snapshot 回归覆盖装配后的应用，并钉住 fork 后没有 session 展开控件。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-27-web-session-fork-actions.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-27-web-session-fork-actions.md
+2026-07-27-web-session-fork-actions.md: b5dc7e820de069a68b38ed87c7d29ffbdb4867bc
+2026-07-27-web-session-fork-actions.zh.md: 774cd74d69eb02d43ca01c8ec7ba1cf94c24b1dc

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-27-web-session-fork-actions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+# Agent Note: Web session fork actions
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-27-web-session-fork-actions.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+The Session store already provides a fork primitive that creates a child session from a completed-turn prefix, but the Web client has no unified interaction contract. The Session-row menu can express only “branch from the latest completed turn,” while message IconActions need to express “branch from the turn containing this message”; if the two entry points independently interpret the boundary, switching, and failure behavior, the same user action acquires two sets of semantics. Nesting a fork child beneath its source session also makes the newly selected child visible only while its ancestors are expanded and weakens the workspace manual-order model.
+
+## Decision
+
+The Web Session-row menu and message IconActions share the client runtime's `sessions.fork` action. A Session row passes `{ sessionId, increaseTitle: true }`, so it forks at the source session's last completed turn; a user message or settled assistant content message passes `{ sessionId, atSeq: node.seq, increaseTitle: true }`, so it forks at the turn containing that event. Only the client consumes `increaseTitle`: after adding the child session to its local list, the client increments a trailing `(N)` or `（N）` in the source session's persisted title without changing bracket style, appends ` (1)` to an unnumbered title, and skips the rename when no persisted title exists; the Host fork request still contains only `sessionId` and the optional `atSeq`. The caller opens the child only after the rename succeeds; a fork or rename failure leaves the source session and current selection unchanged, while a child created before a rename failure remains in the list.
+
+`forkAt(seq)` touches the session service only in ui-conversation's apply injection layer; message components report only the event `seq`. Session rows likewise initiate the operation only through ui-workspace's injected callback. Neither presentation package owns session mutation state or duplicates the host's boundary evaluation.
+
+Session lineage is not projected into a list hierarchy. WorkSpace mode displays source sessions and all fork children as peer rows in the manual order from `WorkspaceView.sessionIds`; every row can be opened, searched, and dragged independently. In one list mode continues to sort strictly by `updatedAt`; the Ungrouped group also sorts by recency when no workspace ledger is available. `parentId` remains available for lineage, tool presentation, and later queries, but does not control session-list visibility.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**Wire only the Session-row menu.** Rejected: at a message, the user has already selected more precise context; forcing them back to the list can only degrade the boundary to the latest completed turn, while the visible message branch icon would remain non-responsive.
+
+**Allow branching only from user messages.** Rejected: settled assistant content also has a stable event `seq`, and the host places it in its containing completed turn; making only one of two visually identical branch buttons work would create an invisible behavioral difference.
+
+**Nest fork children beneath their source by `parentId`.** Rejected: lineage is not navigation ownership; nesting requires automatic ancestor expansion to reveal the current item and prevents children from participating in the workspace's peer manual order.
+
+**Call the session service directly from message components.** Rejected: client components must not touch `ctx` or business services; injected callbacks keep mutation in the apply world and leave components driven purely by props.
+
+## Consequences
+
+Users can create forks from Session rows, user messages, or settled assistant content messages; all three entry points ultimately use the same runtime/host operation. Message entry points preserve the exact event boundary, while the list entry point preserves the “latest completed turn” shortcut. Successive fork titles increment through `(1)`, `(2)`, and so on instead of repeatedly appending `(1)`; titles with fullwidth parentheses retain that style. Every fork child immediately appears as an ordinary peer row, so the list no longer needs session expansion state, recursive nodes, or twist controls.
+
+Fork and child-rename failures stay silent and preserve the source selection, preventing a derivation action from disrupting the current reading position; this tradeoff also means the UI does not yet expose a failure reason or retry entry point. Package tests separately pin the two message `seq` paths, title increments, and the peer-list derivation; `apps/web/tests/message-actions.e2e.ts` exercises assistant-message branching and Session-row menu branching through the assembled application.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-27-web-session-fork-actions.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+# Agent Note: Web session fork 操作
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-27-web-session-fork-actions.md) | 中文
+
+## Problem
+
+Session store 已提供按完成轮前缀创建子会话的 fork 原语，但 Web 端没有一份统一的交互契约。Session 行菜单只能表达「从最新完成轮分支」，消息 IconActions 还需要表达「从这条消息所在轮分支」；如果两处各自解释边界、切换与失败行为，同一个用户动作会形成两套语义。把 fork 子会话嵌套在源会话下还会让新选中的子会话依赖祖先展开态才能看见，并削弱 workspace 的手动排序模型。
+
+## Decision
+
+Web 的 session 行菜单与消息 IconActions 共用 client runtime 的 `sessions.fork` 操作。Session 行传 `{ sessionId, increaseTitle: true }`，因此在源会话最后一个已完成轮次处分支；用户消息与已定稿 assistant 内容消息传 `{ sessionId, atSeq: node.seq, increaseTitle: true }`，因此在包含该事件的轮次处分支。`increaseTitle` 只由 client 消费：子会话进入本地列表后，client 把源会话持久化标题尾部的 `(N)` 或 `（N）` 递增并保留括号样式，无编号时追加 ` (1)`，没有持久化标题时不改名；Host fork 请求仍只有 `sessionId` 与可选的 `atSeq`。改名成功后调用方才打开子会话；fork 或改名失败时保持源会话与当前选择不变，改名失败时已创建的子会话仍留在列表中。
+
+`forkAt(seq)` 只在 ui-conversation 的 apply 注入层接触 session 服务，消息组件只回传事件 `seq`。Session 行同理只通过 ui-workspace 的注入回调发起操作；两个呈现包都不持有 session mutation 状态，也不复制 host 的边界求值。
+
+Session lineage 不投影成列表层级。WorkSpace 模式按 `WorkspaceView.sessionIds` 的手动序把源会话与所有 fork 子会话显示为同级行，每行都可独立打开、搜索和拖拽；In one list 模式继续按 `updatedAt` 严格排序；Ungrouped 组在没有 workspace 账本时也按 recency 排序。`parentId` 仍用于 lineage、工具呈现和后续查询，但不控制 session 列表可见性。
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**只接 session 行菜单。** 否决：用户在消息处已经选择了更精确的上下文，强迫其回到列表只能退化为最新完成轮，且已展示的消息分支图标会成为无响应控件。
+
+**只允许用户消息分支。** 否决：已定稿 assistant 内容同样有稳定事件 `seq`，host 会把它归入所属完成轮；让两个外观相同的分支按钮只有一个可用会制造不可见的行为差异。
+
+**按 `parentId` 把 fork 子会话嵌套在源会话下。** 否决：lineage 不是导航所有权；嵌套要求自动展开祖先才能看见当前项，并让子会话无法参与 workspace 的同级手动排序。
+
+**由消息组件直接调用 session 服务。** 否决：client 组件不得接触 `ctx` 或业务服务；注入回调让 mutation 留在 apply 世界，组件保持纯 props。
+
+## Consequences
+
+用户可从 session 行、用户消息或已定稿 assistant 内容消息创建分支，三处最终走同一个 runtime/host 操作；消息点位保留精确事件边界，列表点位保留「最新完成轮」快捷语义。连续 fork 的标题按 `(1)`、`(2)` 递增，而不是重复追加 `(1)`；全角括号标题保持全角样式。所有 fork 子会话立即作为普通同级行出现，列表不再需要 session 展开状态、递归节点或 twist 控件。
+
+Fork 与子会话改名失败都保持静默并保留源选择，避免一个派生操作破坏当前阅读位置；该取舍也意味着 UI 暂不提供失败原因或重试入口。Package tests 分别钉住两种消息 `seq`、标题递增与同级列表派生，`apps/web/tests/message-actions.e2e.ts` 通过装配后的应用执行 assistant 消息分支与 session 行菜单分支。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-27-web-session-search.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-27-web-session-search.md
+2026-07-27-web-session-search.md: 9a634c586a4793d1c6986a7e7c0b0c1157b5b687
+2026-07-27-web-session-search.zh.md: 5ec2baf7443aaaaa75abc348ee426df9c14fbaa2

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-27-web-session-search.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+# Agent Note: Web 历史会话搜索
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-27-web-session-search.md) | 中文
+
+## 问题
+
+Web 侧边栏会展示会话标题及其 Workspace 归属，但无法根据只出现在消息中的词语检索历史对话。在浏览器中扫描历史记录，需要附加或加载每个会话，重复实现现有的索引搜索服务，也会让冷态持久化会话的检索既缓慢又容易遗漏。产品还需要一条可预测的故障路径：派生索引不可用时，不得抹去客户端能够在本地计算出的标题匹配结果。
+
+## 决策
+
+Web 与 headless 共用的组合会使用 `openAt: first-search` 和内存数据库挂载 [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-query-sqlite`](../../../../packages/session-query/session-query-sqlite/README.md)。服务启动时处于 ACTIVE 状态，而其 `node:sqlite` 模块与连接私有句柄分别要到首次内容查询才会导入和打开。这让 Node 22 的启动输出在使用搜索前不会出现 SQLite 实验性警告，但并不承诺在首次搜索导入该模块时抑制警告。每个服务实例都独占自己的索引，因此并行 CLI 或 Web 调用可维持 SQLite 后端的单一所有者契约，又不会留下进程级派生文件。数据库从空状态启动，并在该首次查询时惰性对齐实时会话与持久化会话。它仍是与规范 JSONL 持久化相互独立的可丢弃派生索引。
+
+宿主网关通过现有的类型化 RPC 栈公开 `session.search`。它根据 `session.list` 使用的同一组可见摘要推导授权集合，向 `ctx.sessionQuery.searchSessions` 请求全局排序后的当前 surface `user/message`、`assistant/message` 和 `steering/message` 匹配项，并持续消费提供方分页，直到获得 20 个已授权会话及一个前瞻项，或结果流耗尽。首个提供方页面请求 20 个命中；如果第一页返回 `SESSION_QUERY_INVALID_LIMIT`，页面大小会依次折半为 10、5、2、1，并在续传和陈旧世代重启中沿用探测所得的大小。每个命中的会话 id、最佳匹配会话 id、surface 和事件类型都会经过重新校验，其 snippet 才能离开宿主。发出的 snippet 最多包含 240 个 Unicode 码点；宿主与传输 schema 共用协议边界及码点安全的截断辅助函数，而传输 schema 会在客户端解析时独立强制执行 snippet 上限。将可能很大的授权集合排除在 SQLite 绑定之外，可避开可移植变量上限，同时保持全局排序。响应仍只有一个有界页面；`hasMore` 会指示 UI 提示用户缩小查询范围，而不是公开分页能力。陈旧的续传会丢弃当前尝试的部分结果、去重条目和游标，然后依据原始可见性快照从第一页重新开始。上限探测与陈旧重试共用 100 次提供方调用的限制（因此最多检查 2,000 个命中）；如果某页命中数超过其请求的上限、续传游标重复，或用尽该调用预算后结果流仍未耗尽，都会直接返回 `internal` 业务错误，不返回部分结果。载体信号会取消已被取代的工作，包括持久化列表枚举、分批受限执行的冷会话元数据 stat，以及每一次提供方调用；即使同时收到上限拒绝或陈旧拒绝，也以取消为准。查询服务缺失或索引／查询故障无法恢复时，仍作为业务错误处理，不会修改规范会话存储。
+
+[`WorkspaceBrowser`](../../../../packages/client/ui-workspace/README.md) 有意将元数据搜索与内容搜索保持独立。其默认界面文案为英文；输入框及防御性请求路径会移除 NUL，将查询限制在请求 schema 规定的 500 个 UTF-16 code unit 内且不会拆分 surrogate pair。非空白查询会立即从会话列表中计算不区分大小写的标题和 Workspace 子串匹配，在 250 ms 防抖后发起内容请求，在查询变化时中止前一请求，并忽略陈旧的完成结果。它先按新近程度排列本地匹配，再合并由后端排序且仅匹配内容的结果，按会话 id 去重；无论常规分组模式如何，最终都渲染为扁平列表。每一行显示标题、Workspace，并在存在时显示一行摘要片段。选择某一行只会打开对应会话，并保留查询条件；不会跳转至确切事件。
+
+结果上限是单一协议常量，而非逐连接状态。`SESSION_SEARCH_RESULT_LIMIT` 位于 `dsh-host-apiproxy` 中强制执行它的响应 schema 旁边，`SessionsService.searchResultLimit` 则把该常量重新公开给呈现插件。功能包要取用它，必须显式扩展 sessions 域的对外面：`ISessions`（即注入为 `ctx.sessions` 的那个面，也因此是测试运行时的 sessions 替身必须实现的面）在该上限旁声明了搜索动作。连接 handle 不携带它：逐连接字段会暗示该上限随传输层变化或由服务端协商，而 schema 固定的 `max` 恰恰禁止这一点，并且会让同一事实在同一模块内拥有两处归属。
+
+内容匹配沿用 SQLite 后端经过规范化的字面 token／短语语义。共享语义投影会排除推理（reasoning）块，因此 UI 搜索绝不会将模型的私有推理作为命中或 snippet 返回；派生索引的 schema 版本会随之前进，使现有持久化索引重建并移除先前的这些文档。FTS5 运算符只作为数据处理，此搜索界面不提供拼写错误纠正、模糊匹配、前缀匹配或任意子串扩展。特别是，`unicode61` 分词器可能将一段连续中文视作单个 token，因此不保证 `搜索` 之类的较短查询能匹配 `会话搜索功能` 的内部片段。标题与 Workspace 匹配仍采用普通的客户端子串匹配。
+
+## 故障与可见性契约
+
+搜索绝不会扩大会话可见范围：没有可供服务的 cwd 的冷会话会被排除，原因与它们不出现在 `session.list` 中相同；只有 id 位于这条基线中的提供方命中才能离开宿主。被遮蔽事件和纯日志事件、消息内容之外的工具事件、错误、待办事项及其他追踪记录都不会产生 UI 命中结果。
+
+首个或后续内容请求仍在处理期间，UI 会保留即时元数据匹配结果，并显示历史搜索状态。如果后端失败，这些行会保持不变，并显示警告说明内容搜索不可用。合并后没有任何行时，界面会显示明确的空状态。候选行超过 20 条时，界面会提示用户缩小查询范围。
+
+## 曾考虑的替代方案
+
+- **在浏览器中扫描每个会话的历史记录**：不予采纳，因为这会让 UI 承担传输与折叠开销；除非加载冷态日志，否则还会漏掉这些日志；并会重复实现已经由 `ctx.sessionQuery` 负责的语义提取与源对齐。
+- **首版即加入 trigram 或模糊搜索**：不予采纳，因为这会改变索引大小、排序、短查询行为与产品预期。trigram 本身也无法解决双字查询。首版沿用现有后端契约，将召回扩展留作另一项基于度量结果的决策。
+- **返回事件地址并跳转至确切匹配位置**：本版不予采纳，因为对话虚拟化与稳定的事件导航需要单独的 UI 契约。会话级导航本身已有价值，无需让搜索与这项工作耦合。
+- **在侧边栏公开游标分页**：不予采纳，改为固定显示前 20 条结果并提示缩小查询范围；这样可使交互与取消状态保持有界。
+
+## 后果
+
+无需预先打开，即可检索到历史持久化对话，同时宿主仍只保留一条可见性边界和一套语义索引实现。即时本地结果掩盖了大部分请求延迟，取消机制可防止已作废查询重新渲染列表，后端故障则会降级为内容搜索尚不可用时已有的行为。
+
+首次内容查询可能耗时更长，因为它要先导入并打开 SQLite，再承担惰性对齐的开销。搜索质量采用 token／短语召回，而不是模糊召回或任意子串召回，并受上述连续中文限制。结果粒度为会话，最多 20 条，不支持分页，也不能跳转到具体消息。如果有效但选择性极差或反复陈旧的提供方尝试未能在 100 次调用内完成，系统会进入仅保留元数据匹配的故障路径，而不是无限制地继续处理。
+
+## 测试
+
+宿主测试将请求与响应校验、可见会话过滤、事件和 surface 过滤、结果与 snippet 边界、共享调用预算内的自适应提供方上限、沿用探测所得上限的陈旧世代重启、游标与跨页去重行为、取消优先级及故障映射固定为契约。SQLite 生命周期测试将启动时激活、首次搜索时的打开与失败、共享就绪状态以及未打开状态下的处置固定为契约；语义提取测试与 SQLite／fixture 搜索测试将排除仅存在于推理中的文本固定为契约。Node 22 兼容性门禁会构建 CLI 与 Web 产物，在移除环境级警告抑制并采用隔离的临时 home／提供方环境后，以普通 Node 启动随产品交付的 `dsh web`／`AppCLIEntry` 组合，等待启动完成并稳定，再沿随产品交付的信号路径对其执行 dispose（资源释放）。fixture（测试前置数据）、运行时与 UI 测试将以匹配位置为中心的有界 snippet、无状态委托、500 个 code unit 的查询边界、防抖／中止／陈旧响应行为、本地回退、合并顺序、去重、英文文案、ARIA 树成员关系、行渲染与导航语义固定为契约。无密钥的组装层 Web 测试会在保留惰性打开配置的同时，播种一段尚未打开的持久化对话，通过 SQLite 索引按可见消息内容找到它，捕获侧边栏结果，打开该会话，并验证查询条件仍然保留。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-28-sdk-max-output-tokens.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-28-sdk-max-output-tokens.md
-2026-07-28-sdk-max-output-tokens.md: 5db48f21892d56addea7b72f73319f9dbfd1e71f
-2026-07-28-sdk-max-output-tokens.zh.md: 38b172718716d100726188163ff22be9ea0a7325
+2026-07-28-sdk-max-output-tokens.md: 3ba3e226d64b7d3d192d67bd88af463d2b0d9dc5
+2026-07-28-sdk-max-output-tokens.zh.md: aec566011d2d7a311b4de509c47ebba383c3b0d7

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-28-sdk-max-output-tokens.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ The Python and TypeScript SDKs could select a provider and model but could not b
 
 The high-level SDKs expose one optional process-wide output cap: Python names it `max_tokens`, TypeScript names it `maxTokens`, and the shared `initialize` wire payload carries `maxTokens`. The JSON-RPC server rejects values that are not positive safe integers and stores the accepted cap with its provider/model route.
 
-Each SDK-created root Agent receives the cap through `AgentOptions.maxTokens`. Agent Loop places that value in the initial `LlmCallConfig`, logs it in the request header, and reconstructs every dispatched conversation request from that durable header. Omitting the option leaves `maxTokens` absent so the selected provider retains its default.
+Each SDK-created root Agent receives the cap through `AgentOptions.maxTokens`. Agent Loop places that value in the initial `LlmCallConfig`; final call preparation preserves the explicit value or materializes an exact-model adapter default, logs the effective cap in the request header, and reconstructs every dispatched conversation request from that durable header. Omitting the SDK option therefore allows the selected adapter or provider route default to apply.
 
 In-process subagents inherit the parent's provider, model, and output cap. An explicit `SubagentStartRequest.agentOptions.maxTokens`, including one configured by `dsh-tool-subagent`, overrides the inherited value for that child and its descendants. Out-of-process providers own the configuration of their separate runtime; `subagent-dsh-sdk` therefore exposes its own optional `maxTokens` and forwards it through that child runtime's SDK handshake.
 
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Compaction, session-title generation, web search, and other auxiliary calls keep
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
-**Set an adapter environment variable.** This would be DeepSeek-adapter-specific, invisible in the session request header, ineffective for intercepted or alternate adapters, and easy to confuse with a provider default. The cap belongs in provider-neutral request configuration.
+**Set only an adapter environment variable.** A serializer-private fallback would be DeepSeek-adapter-specific, invisible in the session request header, ineffective for intercepted or alternate adapters, and easy to confuse with a provider default. Adapter-owned defaults may instead be exposed as exact-model metadata and materialized into provider-neutral request configuration before logging.
 
 **Add `maxTokens` to every `session/prompt`.** Per-turn mutation would enlarge the wire and introduce request-config transitions that callers do not need for the current evaluation use case. A runtime initialization option gives every session in one SDK process the same reproducible budget.
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-28-sdk-max-output-tokens.zh.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Python 与 TypeScript SDK 可以选择提供方和模型，却无法限制对话
 
 高层 SDK 公开一个可选的进程级输出上限：Python 命名为 `max_tokens`，TypeScript 命名为 `maxTokens`，共享的 `initialize` 线载荷使用 `maxTokens`。JSON-RPC 服务端拒绝非正安全整数，并将通过校验的上限与提供方／模型路由一同保存。
 
-每个由 SDK 创建的根 Agent 都通过 `AgentOptions.maxTokens` 获得该上限。Agent Loop 将它放入初始 `LlmCallConfig`、记录到请求 header，并从该持久化 header 重建每次分派的对话请求。省略该选项时，`maxTokens` 保持缺失，由所选提供方保留默认值。
+每个由 SDK 创建的根 Agent 都通过 `AgentOptions.maxTokens` 获得该上限。Agent Loop 将它放入初始 `LlmCallConfig`；最终调用准备会保留显式值，或填入确切模型的适配器默认值，再将生效上限记录到请求 header，并从该持久化 header 重建每次分派的对话请求。因此，省略 SDK 选项时会应用所选适配器或提供方路由的默认值。
 
 进程内 subagent 继承父级的提供方、模型和输出上限。显式的 `SubagentStartRequest.agentOptions.maxTokens`（包括通过 `dsh-tool-subagent` 配置的值）会覆盖该子级及其后代的继承值。进程外提供方自行持有其独立运行时的配置；因此 `subagent-dsh-sdk` 公开独立的可选 `maxTokens`，并通过该子运行时自己的 SDK 握手传入。
 
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Python 与 TypeScript SDK 可以选择提供方和模型，却无法限制对话
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
-**设置适配器环境变量。** 这种方式仅适用于 DeepSeek 适配器，不会出现在会话请求 header 中，对被拦截请求或其他适配器无效，也容易与提供方默认值混淆。该上限属于提供方无关的请求配置。
+**仅设置适配器环境变量。** 序列化器私有回退仅适用于 DeepSeek 适配器，不会出现在会话请求 header 中，对被拦截请求或其他适配器无效，也容易与提供方默认值混淆。适配器持有的默认值可以改为通过确切模型元数据公开，并在记录前填入提供方无关的请求配置。
 
 **在每个 `session/prompt` 上增加 `maxTokens`。** 按轮次修改会扩大线协议，并引入当前评测用例不需要的请求配置转换。运行时初始化选项可让一个 SDK 进程中的每个会话拥有相同、可重现的预算。
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-29-addressable-queue-operations.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-29-addressable-queue-operations.md
-2026-07-29-addressable-queue-operations.md: 78a7d346163bb7e5e76c989c6e93576b4a6cee64
-2026-07-29-addressable-queue-operations.zh.md: 050b9755ad4ebe70e2bdcafb711ef279331e27af
+2026-07-29-addressable-queue-operations.md: 7a08b889c958e583dc430d33a1855fe3725f3d48
+2026-07-29-addressable-queue-operations.zh.md: 701b028c7494fd7cb608d05a5d170c9075b155d7

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-29-addressable-queue-operations.md

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ The Web queue rendered pending messages but could not edit or delete one row. `M
 
 **Queue addresses require a live Agent.** `session.updateQueue` queries only the mounted Agent registry and never resumes a cold session: an `InboxItemId` is process-local and cannot name work after restart or disposal. A missing Agent and a driver-claimed occurrence both return `queue-item-not-found`.
 
-**Web actions address Queue only.** The Host excludes pending steering from `session/queue`; steering retains its existing durable transcript path after consumption. QueueDock exposes edit and delete, but no send-now control. The UI derives queue row and mutation types from the runtime `SessionFace` contract rather than importing the connection plugin, so plugin cooperation continues through services and snapshots. Edit is available only when all content blocks are text; the editor cannot silently drop non-text blocks. An editing row exposes only save and cancel, with Enter and Escape as their keyboard equivalents. Delete removes the exact occurrence.
+**Web actions address Queue only.** The Host excludes pending steering from `session/queue`; steering retains its existing durable transcript path after consumption. QueueDock hides while empty, renders one pending occurrence directly, and defaults two or more occurrences to a collapsed `"<n> 条排队消息"` header that expands or collapses the complete list. The header exposes `aria-expanded` and `aria-controls`; the expanded list scrolls within a 180px height bound. An active edit or mutation keeps its rows visible, and emptying the queue restores the collapsed default for the next queue. Visible rows expose edit and delete, but no send-now control. The UI derives queue row and mutation types from the runtime `SessionFace` contract rather than importing the connection plugin, so plugin cooperation continues through services and snapshots. Edit is available only when all content blocks are text; the editor cannot silently drop non-text blocks. An editing row exposes only save and cancel, with Enter and Escape as their keyboard equivalents. Delete removes the exact occurrence.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ The Web queue rendered pending messages but could not edit or delete one row. `M
 
 ## Verification
 
-AgentLoop contract tests hold prompt admission while editing and removing exact queued occurrences, reject mutations of steering occurrences, and verify the resulting independent turn and terminal lifecycle events. Host schema and proxy tests cover queued-only authoritative snapshots, synchronous re-entrant mutation order, reconnect, cold-Agent rejection, typed not-found errors, and the RPC transport. Client runtime and QueueDock tests cover non-optimistic projection, text-only editing, save and cancel affordances, removal, retirement races, and disabled mixed-content editing. Keyless browser scenarios drive the exposed edit and delete actions through the built Web composition and real HTTP/SSE wire.
+AgentLoop contract tests hold prompt admission while editing and removing exact queued occurrences, reject mutations of steering occurrences, and verify the resulting independent turn and terminal lifecycle events. Host schema and proxy tests cover queued-only authoritative snapshots, synchronous re-entrant mutation order, reconnect, cold-Agent rejection, typed not-found errors, and the RPC transport. Client runtime and QueueDock tests cover non-optimistic projection, single-row presentation, default multi-row collapse, interaction-forced visibility, reset after emptying, expansion, text-only editing, save and cancel affordances, removal, retirement races, and disabled mixed-content editing. Keyless browser scenarios capture the default collapsed header before expanding the queue and driving its exposed edit and delete actions through the built Web composition and real HTTP/SSE wire.
 
 ## Consequences
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-29-addressable-queue-operations.zh.md

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Web 队列能够渲染待处理消息，但无法编辑或删除其中某一行
 
 **Queue 寻址要求 Agent 存活。** `session.updateQueue` 只查询已挂载的 Agent 注册表，绝不恢复冷会话：`InboxItemId` 属于进程本地标识，无法在重启或资源释放后继续指向工作。Agent 缺失和单次入队项已被驱动器认领这两种情况都返回 `queue-item-not-found`。
 
-**Web 操作只面向 Queue。** Host 从 `session/queue` 中排除待处理 steering；steering 消费后仍沿用既有的持久 transcript（文本记录）路径。QueueDock 暴露编辑和删除，不提供立即发送控件。UI 从运行时 `SessionFace` 契约派生队列行与变更类型，而不是导入连接插件，因此插件仍通过服务和快照协作。仅当所有内容块都是文本时才提供编辑功能；编辑器不能静默丢弃非文本块。编辑中的行只展示保存和取消操作，对应的键盘操作分别是 Enter 和 Escape。删除会移除对应的精确入队项。
+**Web 操作只面向 Queue。** Host 从 `session/queue` 中排除待处理 steering；steering 消费后仍沿用既有的持久 transcript（文本记录）路径。QueueDock 在队列为空时隐藏，只有一个待处理项时直接渲染该行，存在两个或更多待处理项时则默认收起为可展开或收起完整列表的 `"<n> 条排队消息"` 表头。表头暴露 `aria-expanded` 和 `aria-controls`；展开后的列表以 180px 为高度上限，并可滚动。存在进行中的编辑或变更时，列表行会保持可见；队列清空后，下一次出现队列时会恢复默认收起状态。可见行暴露编辑和删除操作，不提供立即发送控件。UI 从运行时 `SessionFace` 契约派生队列行与变更类型，而不是导入连接插件，因此插件仍通过服务和快照协作。仅当所有内容块都是文本时才提供编辑功能；编辑器不能静默丢弃非文本块。编辑中的行只展示保存和取消操作，对应的键盘操作分别是 Enter 和 Escape。删除会移除对应的精确入队项。
 
 ## 考虑过的替代方案
 
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Web 队列能够渲染待处理消息，但无法编辑或删除其中某一行
 
 ## 验证
 
-AgentLoop 契约测试会在编辑和移除精确 queued 入队项时阻塞提示词接纳，拒绝对 steering 入队项的变更，并验证所得独立轮次及终态生命周期事件。Host schema 与代理测试覆盖仅含 queued 项的权威快照、同步可重入变更顺序、重连、拒绝冷 Agent、类型化 not-found 错误和 RPC 传输。客户端运行时和 QueueDock 测试覆盖非乐观投影、仅文本编辑、保存与取消入口、移除、退役竞态，以及禁用混合内容编辑。无密钥浏览器场景会通过构建后的 Web 组合和真实 HTTP／SSE 协议操作公开的编辑和删除。
+AgentLoop 契约测试会在编辑和移除精确 queued 入队项时阻塞提示词接纳，拒绝对 steering 入队项的变更，并验证所得独立轮次及终态生命周期事件。Host schema 与代理测试覆盖仅含 queued 项的权威快照、同步可重入变更顺序、重连、拒绝冷 Agent、类型化 not-found 错误和 RPC 传输。客户端运行时和 QueueDock 测试覆盖非乐观投影、单行呈现、多行默认收起、交互期间强制保持可见、清空后重置、展开、仅文本编辑、保存与取消入口、移除、退役竞态，以及禁用混合内容编辑。无密钥浏览器场景会先捕获默认收起的表头，再展开队列，并通过构建后的 Web 组合和真实 HTTP／SSE 协议操作其公开的编辑和删除。
 
 ## 后果
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-29-directory-picker-adaptive-default.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-29-directory-picker-adaptive-default.md
+2026-07-29-directory-picker-adaptive-default.md: 7ff6529bb8e445f63343b1019ac520f56b19d5e4
+2026-07-29-directory-picker-adaptive-default.zh.md: a2a2d8ec4c91a347eedfc3aa3413b091ee847934

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-29-directory-picker-adaptive-default.md

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# Agent Note: Adaptive default for the directory-picker interaction
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-29-directory-picker-adaptive-default.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+The [directory-picker seam](../architecture/2026-07-28-directory-picker-capability-seam.md) made the interaction a `cordis.yml` swap point, but the shipped composition still had to pin one backend: `-browse` everywhere meant a local operator never got the OS chooser, `-native` everywhere breaks every remote deployment. The right default depends on facts only the running host knows — where the server binds, whether the process was launched over SSH, whether a display session exists — so no static row is correct for all deployments.
+
+## Decision
+
+A third sibling package, **`dsh-host-directory-picker-auto`**: a node-half-only *chooser* that owns no picking code and no UI. Its `apply` samples the host facts exactly once at boot — bind host from the injected `httpServer` (a new `host` getter mirrors the existing `port`), `SSH_CONNECTION`/`SSH_TTY`, platform, `DISPLAY`/`WAYLAND_DISPLAY`, and a `PATH` probe for a Linux chooser binary (zenity/kdialog) — resolves them through one exported pure function, and mounts the chosen dual-face backend with `ctx.loader.create({name})` into the Loader's **in-memory root tree**; the effect's disposer removes the entry and joins the backend fiber's teardown (`remove()` alone only starts it), so unloading the chooser settles only after the backend quiesced. `native` requires every attended-and-servable signal: loopback bind ∧ no SSH markers ∧ a display session the native backend can drive — assumed on darwin/win32, requiring `DISPLAY`/`WAYLAND_DISPLAY` plus a chooser binary on linux, and never true elsewhere (the native backend supports exactly darwin/win32/linux). Anything ambiguous resolves to `browse`, which works everywhere. `apps/cli` now mounts `-auto` as its `directory-picker` row; composing `-native` or `-browse` directly remains the pin.
+
+Why entry-level mounting is the load-bearing mechanism: the client module table (`dsh-client-modules`) reconciles **Loader entries** reactively over `internal/plugin`, so a backend mounted as a real entry gets its browser half discovered exactly as a config-row's would be — the seam's one-row-swaps-both-faces invariant survives adaptivity with zero duplicated client code. The dev HMR row (`AppCLIEntry`) is the mechanism precedent. Root-tree targeting matters: the root tree's `write()` is a no-op, so the resolved row can never be persisted back into `cordis.yml` (the Include subtree *does* write).
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+- **Boot-glue resolution in `AppCLIEntry`** (ship both rows with static `disabled`, patch `disabled` from a `--directory-picker=auto|native|browse` flag). Works — `PatchOptions` patches metadata, and the modules scan skips disabled rows — but leaves the decision app-private where every future composition re-implements it; the chooser plugin gives any `cordis.yml` the same one-row adaptivity. Reintroduce the flag only when a deployment needs to *force* a backend without editing its yml.
+- **One merged plugin branching per call** (client tries `pick`, falls back to the browse dialog on `directory-picker-unavailable`). Rejected: the client would need both flows in one bundle — the bundle-purity gate forbids cross-plugin value imports and jscpd forbids copying the dialog — and per-call probing pays a doomed RPC on every open of a browse host.
+- **Resurrecting the wire advertisement** so both client flows mount and branch on the host's kind. Rejected: reverses the seam note's deletion for no consumer the chooser doesn't already serve, and collides with the `single` directory-flow holes.
+- **Per-connection adaptivity** (native for a loopback browser, browse for a remote one, same server). Deferred: needs a per-client capability, the advertisement above, and both flows mounted; no deployment serves both operator shapes at once today.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- The shipped web GUI adapts out of the box: attended local host → OS chooser; SSH launch, all-interfaces bind, headless host, unsupported platform, or Linux without a chooser binary → in-app browser. Detection infers operator location from launch context, which no launch-side signal can prove: a detached tmux session loses `SSH_*`; a non-Aqua darwin process still counts as displayed; and the `ssh -L` shape (a workstation-local launch later reached through a forwarded port, arriving from `127.0.0.1`) resolves `native` and opens the chooser on the unattended workstation — per-connection adaptivity could not fix that last case either. A wrong `native` choice degrades to the backend's existing retryable failure dialog; deployments in these shapes compose `-browse` directly.
+- The chooser mounts backends by runtime string (`BACKEND_PACKAGES`, exported), which yml-row scanning cannot see; `verify-cordis-config` therefore requires every composition mounting `-auto` to declare both backends as dependencies, so keyless Linux CI (which only ever resolves `browse`) cannot hide a dropped `-native` dependency. The shipped-tree web e2e/snapshot lane (`apps/web/tests/scaffold.ts`) pins `-browse` by disable+insert patch — its goldens are interaction-specific and must not depend on the host running the suite.
+- One resolution per boot keeps the seam's capability-stability contract; per-connection shapes remain out of scope until a deployment demands them.
+- Mounting the chooser **and** a backend row together fails loud (duplicate `directoryPicker` service; duplicate flow in the `single` holes).
+- The host typecheck aggregate now references the two backend projects (declarations only, node entries carry no client merge) so the chooser's REAL-composition test can mount them — the mirror of the client aggregate's `webserver` reference.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-29-directory-picker-adaptive-default.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# Agent Note：目录选择交互的自适应默认值
+
+状态：已实现
+
+[English](2026-07-29-directory-picker-adaptive-default.md) | 中文
+
+## 问题
+
+[目录选择 seam](../architecture/2026-07-28-directory-picker-capability-seam.md)把交互形态做成了 `cordis.yml` 的切换点，但随附的组合仍必须固定一个后端：处处用 `-browse` 意味着本地操作者永远得不到 OS 选择器，处处用 `-native` 则弄坏所有远程部署。正确的默认值取决于只有运行中的宿主才知道的事实——服务器绑定在哪里、进程是否经 SSH 启动、是否存在显示会话——因此没有哪一静态行对所有部署都正确。
+
+## 决策
+
+第三个同级包 **`dsh-host-directory-picker-auto`**：一个只有 node 半侧的*选择器*，不持有任何选取代码，也没有 UI。它的 `apply` 在启动时恰好采样一次宿主事实——从注入的 `httpServer` 读绑定宿主（新增的 `host` getter 与既有的 `port` 对称）、`SSH_CONNECTION`／`SSH_TTY`、平台、`DISPLAY`／`WAYLAND_DISPLAY`、以及对 Linux 选择器二进制（zenity／kdialog）的一次 `PATH` 探查——经由一个导出的纯函数判定，再用 `ctx.loader.create({name})` 把选中的双面后端挂进 Loader 的**内存根树**；该 effect 的 disposer 会移除该条目并汇入后端 fiber 的拆卸（单靠 `remove()` 只是启动拆卸），因此卸载选择器要到后端静止之后才落定。`native` 要求全部“有人值守且可服务”信号：回环绑定 ∧ 无 SSH 标记 ∧ native 后端能驱动的显示会话——darwin／win32 上视为存在，linux 上要求 `DISPLAY`／`WAYLAND_DISPLAY` 外加一个选择器二进制，其余平台一律不成立（native 后端恰好支持 darwin／win32／linux）。任何含糊情形都判定为处处可用的 `browse`。`apps/cli` 现在把 `-auto` 挂为它的 `directory-picker` 行；直接组合 `-native` 或 `-browse` 仍是固定交互的方式。
+
+条目级挂载之所以是承重机制：client 模块表（`dsh-client-modules`）基于 `internal/plugin` 对 **Loader 条目**做响应式协调，因此以真实条目挂载的后端，其 browser half 被发现的方式与配置行完全相同——seam 的“一行同时换两面”不变式在自适应下依然成立，且没有一行重复的 client 代码。开发环境的 HMR 行（`AppCLIEntry`）是该机制的先例。瞄准根树很关键：根树的 `write()` 是 no-op，因此判定出的行绝不会被持久化回 `cordis.yml`（Include 子树*会*写回）。
+
+## 曾考虑的替代方案
+
+- **在 `AppCLIEntry` 里做启动胶水判定**（随附两行并带静态 `disabled`，由 `--directory-picker=auto|native|browse` 标志修补 `disabled`）。可行——`PatchOptions` 能修补元数据，模块扫描也会跳过禁用行——但把决策留成应用私有，此后每个组合都要重新实现；选择器插件让任何 `cordis.yml` 都获得同样的一行自适应。只有当某个部署需要不改自己的 yml 就*强制*指定后端时，才重新引入该标志。
+- **合并成一个按调用分支的插件**（client 先试 `pick`，收到 `directory-picker-unavailable` 再回退到浏览对话框）。否决：client 得把两套流程装进同一个 bundle——bundle 纯净门禁禁止跨插件的值导入，jscpd 禁止复制对话框——而且按调用探测让 browse 宿主每次打开都付出一次注定失败的 RPC。
+- **复活 wire 广播**，让两套 client 流程都挂载并按宿主的 kind 分支。否决：推翻 seam Agent Note 的那次删除，却服务不了任何选择器尚未服务的消费方，还与 `single` 目录流洞相冲突。
+- **按连接自适应**（同一台服务器，回环浏览器用 native、远程浏览器用 browse）。延期：需要按客户端的能力对象、上述广播，以及同时挂载两套流程；今天没有部署同时服务两种操作者形态。
+
+## 后果
+
+- 随附的 web GUI 开箱即自适应：有人值守的本地宿主 → OS 选择器；SSH 启动、全网卡绑定、无头宿主、不支持的平台，或没有选择器二进制的 Linux → 应用内浏览器。探测是从启动上下文推断操作者位置，而任何启动侧信号都无法证明这一点：脱离的 tmux 会话会丢失 `SSH_*`；非 Aqua 的 darwin 进程仍被算作有显示；而 `ssh -L` 形态（在工作站本地启动、之后经转发端口访问，从 `127.0.0.1` 到达）会判定 `native`，把选择器弹在无人值守的工作站上——即便按连接自适应也修不了最后这一情形。错误的 `native` 选择会退化为后端既有的可重试失败对话框；处于这些形态的部署直接组合 `-browse`。
+- 选择器按运行时字符串（已导出的 `BACKEND_PACKAGES`）挂载后端，yml 行扫描看不到这一点；因此 `verify-cordis-config` 要求每个挂载 `-auto` 的组合把两个后端都声明为依赖，使无密钥的 Linux CI（它永远只会判定出 `browse`）无法掩盖被丢掉的 `-native` 依赖。随附树的 web e2e／快照通道（`apps/web/tests/scaffold.ts`）以 disable+insert 补丁固定 `-browse`——其 golden 是交互特定的，绝不能依赖运行该套件的宿主。
+- 每次启动只判定一次，维持 seam 的能力稳定性契约；按连接的形态在有部署提出需求前仍不在范围内。
+- 同时挂载选择器**和**某个后端行会大声失败（重复的 `directoryPicker` 服务；`single` 洞中的重复流程）。
+- host 类型检查聚合现在引用两个后端项目（仅声明，node 入口不携带 client 合并），使选择器的 REAL-composition 测试能挂载它们——与 client 聚合对 `webserver` 的引用互为镜像。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-29-web-message-icon-actions-and-clock.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-29-web-message-icon-actions-and-clock.md
-2026-07-29-web-message-icon-actions-and-clock.md: e79662056792c3ab413468ad038dec40455be767
-2026-07-29-web-message-icon-actions-and-clock.zh.md: 72d3b4e0cda19438f2f46fd402b3b76de3726ae5
+2026-07-29-web-message-icon-actions-and-clock.md: f43f7f9c9687e4494993d7e225d11cf6446a9954
+2026-07-29-web-message-icon-actions-and-clock.zh.md: 866fae79f6ad3ea2cb80e5443d2cf5f763562d29

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-29-web-message-icon-actions-and-clock.md

@@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ The web chat user bubble already had copy / branch / edit IconActions but no clo
 
 ## Decision
 
-**User bubbles prepend a date-aware local clock to the existing IconActions row; finalized assistant *content* nodes (non-empty text blocks) append a copy / branch / clock row with `margin-top: 16px`; both seats stay visible whenever mounted and re-format at the next local midnight.**
+**User bubbles prepend a date-aware local clock to the existing IconActions row; the last content-text assistant of each turn appends a copy / branch / clock row with `margin-top: 16px`; both seats stay visible whenever mounted and re-format at the next local midnight.**
 
-Both seats format `node.time` through `formatMessageClock`: same calendar day → `HH:mm`, earlier this year → `M月D日 HH:mm`, other years → `YYYY年M月D日 HH:mm`. `useCalendarDay` is a component-local day tick (timeout to the next local midnight) so memoized rows re-render when the calendar day changes without a new framework hook. `MessageItem` places the label before copy (figma `388:20051`). `AssistantMarkdown` places it after branch (figma `43:32997`) only when `streaming` is false, the event time is known, and the node has non-empty text content; Think-only nodes and the streaming tail omit the row. Copy writes joined text blocks. Branch stays a chrome stub. Clipboard write and the clock helpers live in `message-chrome.ts`. The assembled surface is pinned by `apps/web/tests/message-actions.e2e.ts` (cold-seeded history + aria golden); aria normalization collapses every clock shape to `{{clock}}`.
+Both seats format `node.time` through `formatMessageClock`: same calendar day → `HH:mm`, earlier this year → `M月D日 HH:mm`, other years → `YYYY年M月D日 HH:mm`. `useCalendarDay` is a component-local day tick (timeout to the next local midnight) so memoized rows re-render when the calendar day changes without a new framework hook. `MessageItem` places the label before copy (figma `388:20051`). `ChatView` derives turn-tail seqs via `assistantActionsSeqs` and withholds `time` for mid-turn content; `AssistantMarkdown` places the row after branch (figma `43:32997`) only when `streaming` is false, the event time is known, and the node has non-empty text content. Think-only nodes, mid-turn narration, and the streaming tail omit the row. Copy writes joined text blocks. Both message rows pass their event's `seq` to the same fork callback; [Web session fork actions](2026-07-27-web-session-fork-actions.md) define the real mutation contract. Clipboard write and the clock helpers live in `message-chrome.ts`. The assembled surface is pinned by `apps/web/tests/message-actions.e2e.ts` (cold-seeded history + aria golden); aria normalization collapses every clock shape to `{{clock}}`.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
@@ -20,12 +20,14 @@ Both seats format `node.time` through `formatMessageClock`: same calendar day
 
 **Put IconActions under every finalized assistant node (including Think-only).** Rejected: copy has nothing useful to write without text content, and repeating the chrome under every step/Think row clutters the flow; only content output owns the seat.
 
+**Put IconActions under every content-text assistant in a multi-step turn.** Rejected: mid-turn narration (text before tools) is not the settled answer; repeating copy/branch/clock under each step clutters the flow. Only the last content assistant of the turn owns the seat.
+
 **Hover-reveal the action row on hover-capable pointers.** Rejected: once the row exists it should stay discoverable; opacity hiding made the chrome easy to miss and required parent hover selectors that duplicated the mount gate.
 
-**Wire branch to a real session fork.** Rejected for this change: same rationale as the archived [user IconActions note](../../archived/feature/2026-07-27-user-message-icon-actions.md) — the mutation path is unspecified; the button reserves the design seat.
+**Let the IconActions decision also define session fork semantics.** Rejected: this note owns only message chrome, clocks, and mount gating; boundary selection, failure behavior, and switching semantics belong to the separate [Web session fork actions](2026-07-27-web-session-fork-actions.md), keeping presentation components from becoming a second home for session mutation.
 
 **Publish the calendar day through a chat store or inject hook.** Rejected: the day tick is presentation-only local state with no cross-entry consumers; a component-local timeout matches the client rule that behavioral hooks may own state that does not subscribe to an external source.
 
 ## Consequences
 
-Settled assistant content answers expose copy and the event clock as soon as the row mounts; Think-only nodes stay chrome-free; branch stays a stub. User and assistant clocks share the same day/year widening rules and refresh after midnight without a message mutation. Per-message paging remains a deferred footer seat in the package README. Package tests pin the three clock shapes, the midnight widen, and the content-only assistant gate; the web e2e scenario pins the assembled IconActions chrome.
+Each turn's last settled content answer exposes copy, branch, and the event clock as soon as the row mounts; mid-turn content and Think-only nodes stay chrome-free. User and assistant clocks share the same day/year widening rules and refresh after midnight without a message mutation. Per-message paging remains a deferred footer seat in the package README. Package tests pin the three clock shapes, the midnight widen, the content-only assistant gate, the turn-tail seq gate, and the respective event `seq` values passed by the user and assistant branch buttons; the web e2e scenario pins the assembled IconActions chrome.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-29-web-message-icon-actions-and-clock.zh.md

@@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ Web 聊天的用户气泡已有复制／分支／编辑 IconActions，但没有
 
 ## 决策
 
-**用户气泡在既有 IconActions 行前追加感知日期的本地时钟；已定稿的 assistant *内容*节点（非空 text 块）在正文下追加带 `margin-top: 16px` 的复制／分支／时钟；两边只要挂载就保持可见，并在下一个本地午夜重新格式化。**
+**用户气泡在既有 IconActions 行前追加感知日期的本地时钟；每个轮次中最后一条带 text 内容的 assistant 在正文下追加带 `margin-top: 16px` 的复制／分支／时钟；两边只要挂载就保持可见，并在下一个本地午夜重新格式化。**
 
-两边都通过 `formatMessageClock` 格式化 `node.time`：同一日历日 → `HH:mm`，同年更早 → `M月D日 HH:mm`，跨年 → `YYYY年M月D日 HH:mm`。`useCalendarDay` 是组件本地的日刻度（定时到下一个本地午夜），因此 memo 行在日历日变化时会重渲染，且不新增框架 hook。`MessageItem` 把标签放在复制之前（figma `388:20051`）。`AssistantMarkdown` 把它放在分支之后（figma `43:32997`），且仅在 `streaming` 为 false、已知事件时间、且节点含非空 text 内容时渲染；纯 Think 节点与流式尾部省略该行。复制写入拼接后的 text 块。分支仍是 chrome stub。剪贴板写入与时钟辅助函数放在 `message-chrome.ts`。组装面由 `apps/web/tests/message-actions.e2e.ts`（冷 seed 历史 + aria golden）钉住；aria 归一化把每种时钟形态折叠为 `{{clock}}`。
+两边都通过 `formatMessageClock` 格式化 `node.time`：同一日历日 → `HH:mm`，同年更早 → `M月D日 HH:mm`，跨年 → `YYYY年M月D日 HH:mm`。`useCalendarDay` 是组件本地的日刻度（定时到下一个本地午夜），因此 memo 行在日历日变化时会重渲染，且不新增框架 hook。`MessageItem` 把标签放在复制之前（figma `388:20051`）。`ChatView` 通过 `assistantActionsSeqs` 推导轮次尾部的 seq，并不为轮次中间的内容传入 `time`；`AssistantMarkdown` 把该行放在分支之后（figma `43:32997`），且仅在 `streaming` 为 false、已知事件时间、且节点含非空 text 内容时渲染。纯 Think 节点、轮次中间的叙述与流式尾部省略该行。复制写入拼接后的 text 块。两种消息行都把自己的事件 `seq` 交给同一个 fork 回调；真实 mutation 契约由 [Web session fork 操作](2026-07-27-web-session-fork-actions.md)定义。剪贴板写入与时钟辅助函数放在 `message-chrome.ts`。组装面由 `apps/web/tests/message-actions.e2e.ts`（冷 seed 历史 + aria golden）钉住；aria 归一化把每种时钟形态折叠为 `{{clock}}`。
 
 ## 曾考虑的方案
 
@@ -20,12 +20,14 @@ Web 聊天的用户气泡已有复制／分支／编辑 IconActions，但没有
 
 **给每个已定稿 assistant 节点（含纯 Think）都挂 IconActions。** 否决：没有 text 内容时复制没有可写内容，且在每一步／Think 下重复 chrome 会打乱流程；只有内容输出拥有该座位。
 
+**给多步骤轮次中的每一条带 text 内容的 assistant 都挂 IconActions。** 否决：轮次中间的叙述（工具调用前的 text）不是已定稿答案；在每一步下重复复制／分支／时钟会打乱流程。只有该轮次中最后一条内容 assistant 拥有该座位。
+
 **在具备 hover 能力的指针上用 hover 才揭示操作行。** 否决：行一旦存在就应保持可发现；用 opacity 隐藏容易漏看，且需要父级 hover 选择器重复挂载门控。
 
-**把分支接到真实的会话 fork。** 本次否决：与已归档的[用户 IconActions 笔记](../../archived/feature/2026-07-27-user-message-icon-actions.md)同一理由——变更路径尚未规定；按钮只预留设计座位。
+**由 IconActions 决策同时定义 session fork 语义。** 否决：本笔记只拥有消息 chrome、时钟与挂载门控；边界选择、失败行为和切换语义属于独立的 [Web session fork 操作](2026-07-27-web-session-fork-actions.md)，避免展示组件成为 session mutation 的第二正家。
 
 **通过 chat store 或 inject hook 发布日历日。** 否决：日刻度只是展示层本地状态，没有跨入口消费者；组件本地 timeout 符合「行为 hook 可拥有不订阅外部源的状态」这一客户端规则。
 
 ## 后果
 
-已定稿的 assistant 内容回答在行挂载后立刻暴露复制与事件时钟；纯 Think 节点不带 chrome；分支仍为 stub。用户与 assistant 时钟共用同一套跨天／跨年加宽规则，并在午夜后无需消息变更即可刷新。逐消息分页仍是包 README 中的暂缓 footer 座位。包级测试钉住三种时钟形态、午夜加宽与 assistant 仅内容门控；Web e2e 场景钉住组装后的 IconActions chrome。
+每个轮次中最后一条已定稿的内容回答在行挂载后立刻暴露复制、分支与事件时钟；轮次中间的内容与纯 Think 节点不带 chrome。用户与 assistant 时钟共用同一套跨天／跨年加宽规则，并在午夜后无需消息变更即可刷新。逐消息分页仍是包 README 中的暂缓 footer 座位。包级测试钉住三种时钟形态、午夜加宽、assistant 仅内容门控、轮次尾部 seq 门控，以及 user/assistant 分支按钮各自传递的事件 `seq`；Web e2e 场景钉住组装后的 IconActions chrome。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-deepseek-onboarding-credential-setup.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-deepseek-onboarding-credential-setup.md
+2026-07-30-deepseek-onboarding-credential-setup.md: 571b81a1a2e6f392f2553070048964d49941aae9
+2026-07-30-deepseek-onboarding-credential-setup.zh.md: 744c30814f84d063f196ce20ba48fb993d0b7713

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-deepseek-onboarding-credential-setup.md

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+# Agent Note: official DeepSeek first-run credential setup
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-30-deepseek-onboarding-credential-setup.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+The [web configuration plane](../architecture/2026-07-30-web-config-plane.md) makes provider settings and credentials live-editable, but a first-time user still lands on the empty conversation Hero without an actionable explanation when the shipped `deepseek-official` route has no credential. The Models page can repair that state, yet requiring the user to discover it weakens onboarding. A prompt must not confuse a missing credential with a missing adapter: the browser can store a value for an existing credential reference, but it cannot dynamically mount the `llm-deepseek` Cordis plugin.
+
+## Decision
+
+**One readiness projection owns both Models and onboarding facts.** `ui-models` keeps a single store that joins `llm.providers({})`, redacted `settings.describe({})`, and batched `credentials.describe({refs})`. The onboarding projection selects the `deepseek-official` configurable-provider entry owned by the `llm-deepseek` namespace and empty settings path, reads the effective `apiKeyEnv`, and evaluates the matching credential descriptor. A live route with the same provider id but no matching configurable-provider declaration is adapter-absent for onboarding. A configured literal `apiKey` secret sidecar is also ready, so compatibility configuration does not trigger a false prompt; a configured process-environment credential is ready and remains read-only.
+
+**The settings shell contributes navigation state, not provider policy.** `ui-settings` declares a root-scoped `settings.onboarding` list slot and tells registrants whether the current surface is the empty Hero. Its private `openSection(id)` callback opens the settings panel on one registered section. `ui-models` registers the DeepSeek overlay through the same declaration-aware deferred-registration path as its Models section, so plugin load order does not become a contract.
+
+**The prompt routes to the one credential editor.** A mounted, active adapter with a resolved, writable, unconfigured reference presents one action that opens Settings on Models. The existing DeepSeek setup card there exclusively owns the password input, `credentials.set({ref, value})`, write failures, and post-write refresh; the onboarding overlay never holds or submits a secret.
+
+**Unavailable states do not capture the product.** An absent configurable-provider entry, inactive route, failed initial join, read-only deployment, or unresolved settings or credential capability suppresses the modal because the onboarding action cannot repair that state. The Models page remains the deployment diagnostic and retry surface. Configure later dismisses a missing-credential overlay for the current mounted surface and writes no completion fact. Settings, credential, provider-topology, and connection invalidations all refresh the shared join, so an external credential update closes an open prompt without a reload.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**A separate onboarding store and readiness RPC sequence** — rejected because it would create a second client-side interpretation of provider identity, settings paths, secret sidecars, credential references, and invalidation ordering beside the Models page.
+
+**A second API-key editor inside onboarding** — rejected because the Models page already renders its DeepSeek setup card for exactly this state. Duplicating its secret draft, write errors, and configured-state convergence would add a second security-sensitive UI without another user capability.
+
+**Writing the API key into provider settings** — rejected because a literal secret would enter the settings mutation path and whole-section replacement cannot safely reconstruct redacted values. Credential storage is already the product seam and supplies immediate invalidation.
+
+**Showing the prompt when `llm-deepseek` is absent** — rejected because browser navigation has no supported operation that mounts the missing Cordis plugin.
+
+## Consequences
+
+The first-run flow leads to the shipped adapter's existing editor without restarting: a keyless browser test boots the real Web composition under an isolated harness home, follows the prompt to Models, stores a generated key through that page into the home's `.env`, verifies no key reaches DOM, ARIA, or browser console output, and confirms the running page reports configured. The full keyless Web replay lane also pins that a non-configurable replay route with the same provider id does not block unrelated journeys. Pure readiness and React tests pin literal, file, process-environment, missing-provider, missing-capability, navigation, cancellation, and external-invalidation behavior. The flow deliberately inherits the configuration plane's documented base limitations rather than adding local secret storage, redaction, or settings replacement workarounds.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-deepseek-onboarding-credential-setup.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+# Agent Note: DeepSeek 官方首次使用凭据配置
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-30-deepseek-onboarding-credential-setup.md) | 中文
+
+## 问题
+
+[web 配置平面](../architecture/2026-07-30-web-config-plane.md)让提供方设置与凭据可以实时编辑，但首次使用的用户仍会进入空白对话 Hero；当随产品提供的 `deepseek-official` 路由缺少凭据时，界面没有给出可采取操作的说明。Models 页能修复该状态，但要求用户自行发现这个入口会削弱首次使用引导。界面不得混淆凭据缺失与适配器缺失：浏览器可以为现有凭据引用存入值，但无法动态挂载 `llm-deepseek` Cordis 插件。
+
+## 决策
+
+**Models 与首次使用引导共享同一个就绪状态投影。**`ui-models` 维护一个 store，把 `llm.providers({})`、脱敏后的 `settings.describe({})` 和批量调用的 `credentials.describe({refs})` 联接为同一份状态。首次使用投影选取由 `llm-deepseek` namespace 所有、设置路径为空的 `deepseek-official` 可配置提供方条目，读取生效的 `apiKeyEnv`，并检查对应的凭据描述符。同一提供方 ID 下的存活路由若没有匹配的可配置提供方声明，首次使用引导会将其视为适配器缺失。若 `apiKey` 字面量对应的 secret 槽位标记为已设置，也会判定为就绪，兼容配置因此不会误触发浮层；通过进程环境提供的凭据若已配置，同样判定为就绪并保持只读。
+
+**设置外壳只贡献导航状态，不持有提供方策略。**`ui-settings` 声明一个根作用域的 `settings.onboarding` list slot，并告知注册方当前界面是否为空白 Hero。其私有 `openSection(id)` 回调会打开设置面板并切换到一个已注册分区。`ui-models` 沿用 Models 分区所使用、感知 slot 声明的延迟注册路径来注册 DeepSeek 浮层，因此插件加载顺序不会成为契约。
+
+**浮层只负责跳转到唯一的凭据编辑器。**适配器已挂载且处于活跃状态，其引用可解析、可写但尚未配置时，界面会显示一个操作按钮，用于打开「设置」的 Models 分区。该分区已有的 DeepSeek 设置卡片全权负责密码输入框、`credentials.set({ref, value})`、写入失败处理和写入后刷新；首次使用浮层绝不持有或提交 secret。
+
+**不可用状态不会拦截产品交互。**可配置提供方条目缺失、路由未激活、初始联接失败、部署只读、设置能力无法解析或凭据能力无法解析时均不显示模态框，因为首次使用引导的操作无法修复这些状态。Models 页仍是部署诊断与重试界面。「稍后配置」只会在当前已挂载界面中关闭凭据缺失浮层，不写入任何完成状态。设置、凭据、提供方拓扑和连接失效事件都会刷新共享联接，因此外部凭据更新无需重新加载页面即可关闭已打开的浮层。
+
+## 曾考虑的替代方案
+
+**为首次使用引导单设 store 与就绪状态 RPC 调用序列**：不予采用，因为这会在 Models 页之外，再建立一套客户端解释，用于判定提供方身份、设置路径、secret 槽位的伴随信息、凭据引用及失效事件顺序。
+
+**在首次使用引导中增设第二个 API key 编辑器**：不予采用，因为 Models 页已为这一状态渲染 DeepSeek 设置卡片。复制其中的 secret 草稿、写入错误处理和已配置状态收敛会增加第二个安全敏感的 UI，却不会带来新的用户能力。
+
+**把 API key 写入提供方设置**：不予采用，因为字面量 secret 会进入设置变更路径，而整个分节替换无法安全重建脱敏值。凭据存储已经是产品 seam，并能立即发出失效事件。
+
+**`llm-deepseek` 缺失时仍显示浮层**：不予采用，因为浏览器导航没有任何受支持的操作可以挂载缺失的 Cordis 插件。
+
+## 后果
+
+首次使用流程无需重启即可引导用户前往随产品提供的适配器已有的编辑器：无密钥浏览器测试在隔离的 harness 家目录下启动真实 Web 组合，依照浮层操作前往 Models，通过该页面把生成的密钥存入该目录的 `.env`，验证密钥未进入 DOM、ARIA 或浏览器控制台输出，并确认运行中的页面报告已配置。完整的无密钥 Web 回放链路还固化了同一提供方 ID 下的不可配置回放路由不会阻塞无关流程。纯就绪状态测试与 React 测试固化了字面量凭据、文件凭据、进程环境凭据、提供方缺失、能力缺失、导航、取消和外部失效行为。该流程直接继承配置平面已记录的基础限制，不会另加局部的机密存储、脱敏或设置替换变通方案。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-plan-review-presentation-intent.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-plan-review-presentation-intent.md
+2026-07-30-plan-review-presentation-intent.md: aeab12aac308c24aa5c4b5953a60ae0f2cf6c5b5
+2026-07-30-plan-review-presentation-intent.zh.md: 4096018e374212c821675ce6ed3a2355df20edc9

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-plan-review-presentation-intent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+# Agent Note: Plan review as a decision, not a question
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-30-plan-review-presentation-intent.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+`exit_plan_mode` presents a finished plan for review through `ctx.userInteraction.ask()`, the same seam `ask_user_question` uses. On the Web GUI that made a plan review render as the generic question flow of [the ask-question Web presentation](2026-07-29-ask-question-web-presentation.md): a `1 / 1` pager, the plan as a question's supporting detail, the two verdicts as numbered radio rows with descriptions, an "Other — enter a custom answer" row, and `Skip this question` / `Submit` in the footer.
+
+Every one of those affordances is wrong for the surface. Reviewing a plan is one decision over one document, and the quiz chrome told the user they were being examined rather than asked to approve work — reported as "让人很困惑以为在做题". The paging controls page a set of one. Skipping is not an outcome the tool accepts (it folds into keep-planning). Worst, the surface gave no hint that this was the plan gate at all, while the adjacent waiting-approval takeover already had exactly the right shape for a decision: a tinted strip naming what is being decided, the subject as the body, and a right-aligned action row.
+
+## Decision
+
+A question may declare a **presentation intent**, and the Web composer renders a declared intent as its own surface. `AskUserQuestionItem` gains `intent?: AskUserQuestionIntent`, a tagged shape whose one member is `{ kind: 'plan-review', approve: string }`; `plan-mode` sets it on the review question, naming `Approve` as the label that approves.
+
+An intent shapes presentation only. The answer protocol is untouched: a UI honouring the intent answers with the same option labels a generic UI would send, so `exit_plan_mode` reads one answer shape regardless of which surface collected it, and a UI that does not know a tag renders the generic flow with nothing lost but the layout.
+
+`approve` names the affirmative option instead of relying on option order, so no UI infers a verdict from a position. Two assertions an intent makes are beyond the types, and `UserInteractionService.ask()` rejects both as `BAD_INTENT` at the asker: an `approve` naming none of that question's own options — before any UI can answer a choice never offered — and an intent on a question with no `detail`, the thing it declares itself a review of, which would ask the user to approve something invisible. On the wire the intent is a discriminated union, so an unrecognised tag is a rejected frame rather than a silently generic render.
+
+`ui-question` renders the intent as `PlanReviewPanel`, in the waiting-approval card language: the amber strip carries `Plan review`, the plan is the scrolling markdown body, and the decision row holds three actions — `Chat about it`, `Refuse`, `Approve`. The question text becomes the card's accessible name rather than a headline, because the buttons already say what the decision is. Approve and Refuse answer with the asker's own option labels and keep the asker's descriptions as tooltips; `Chat about it` cancels the request, which returns the composer so the user can simply say what they want. All copy is bilingual under the existing `question` namespace.
+
+Routing lives inside the single composer entry (`QuestionComposer` chooses the shape) rather than in a second chain registration, and `planReviewOf` claims a request only when the card can send every answer that request allows: one question declaring the intent, the plan as its `detail`, the named approve label offered, and a binary single choice — at most one option besides approve, and not multi-select. A third option or a multi-select batch has answers two buttons cannot express, so the generic flow keeps it, and keeps anything else the card cannot render. "Presentation only" is therefore literal: an intent never costs the user a reachable answer, and the client — downstream of a wire boundary — leaves every request answerable.
+
+Dismissal became its own model-facing outcome. `ASK_CANCELLED` previously reached the model as "the user cancelled ask_user_question", naming a tool it never called; `exit_plan_mode` now reports that the user dismissed the review to speak instead and to stay in plan mode and wait. Every other ask failure — an abort from turn cancel or provider teardown, where no user is coming — keeps its own message.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**Make plan review its own pending kind (`plan-review/requested`).** Rejected as the wrong size for a presentation problem. It buys an honest response shape (approve / decline / discuss instead of an answer batch) at the cost of a third `PendingKind`, new requested/resolved frames and schemas, an api-proxy registry and respond branch, client session and baseline-replay handling, and a new three-package capability seam for a decision the question protocol already expresses. Worth revisiting only if plan review grows outcomes the answer shape cannot carry.
+
+**Route the card on the question's `id` or `header` (`plan-review` / `Plan review`).** Rejected: string-sniffing a foreign package's copy across a wire boundary, which any wording change silently breaks. The intent is the declaration that makes the routing legible.
+
+**Order the options and let the card read position 0 as approve.** Rejected: a positional contract at a package seam, invisible in both the type and the wire frame, and unenforceable — a producer that reorders its options would invert a user's verdict. Naming the label costs one string.
+
+**Register a second composer-chain entry for the plan card.** Rejected: two entries would select over the same pending question carrier, making the surface depend on chain priority and on whether the plan package's client half is composed at all. One entry that picks its own shape cannot race itself, and the generic flow is the built-in fallback.
+
+**Put the panel in `ui-plan` beside the plan chip.** Rejected: the panel's whole behavior is the question carrier's answer encoding (`PendingQuestion`), which `ui-question` owns; the intent is a question-protocol field, not plan-mode's private channel. Rendering declared intents belongs to the package that owns question rendering, as tool render intents belong to the tool renderer.
+
+**Extract a shared takeover card with `ui-conversation`'s `ApprovalPanel`.** Not done: the two takeovers agree on tokens and geometry but not on content — this body is scrolling markdown, that one a headline plus a command line — and the shared shell would be two elements wide. They are kept in step by token, not by component.
+
+**Give `Chat about it` its own protocol outcome.** Rejected: dismissing a request is a verb the generic flow already has (the `×` that cancels the batch). Promoting it to a labelled button is presentation; inventing a fourth wire outcome for it is not.
+
+## Consequences
+
+The question protocol now carries a presentation axis. Adding a second intent is a tag on the union, a producer that sets it, a schema member, and a panel — no new frame, service, or answer shape. The cost is that the question seam knows presentation exists at all, and that `ui-question` knows the word "plan"; both are the price of one entry owning every question surface.
+
+The plan gate reads as a plan gate: the plan is the card's content, the verdict is two labelled buttons, and taking the turn back is a third. The generic flow is untouched for every other question, and its committed goldens did not move.
+
+A deployment whose client half predates this change still shows the quiz layout — correct, answerable, and merely unstyled — because the intent is additive and the fallback is the generic flow.
+
+## Testing
+
+`ui-question` tests pin the narrowing (single-question batch, intent present, plan as detail, named approve label offered, binary single choice, decline absent when only approve is offered) and the panel (strip, markdown plan, accessible name, absence of pager/radio/skip/custom, approve and decline answering with the asker's labels, dismissal cancelling, one-shot latch with re-arm and message on a rejected receipt, tooltips present and absent, both locales). `user-interaction` tests pin both `BAD_INTENT` rejections and intent pass-through; `plan-mode` tests pin the declared intent against its own option list and both failure messages; the apiproxy schema test pins wire acceptance and an unknown tag's rejection.
+
+The `plan-review` Web e2e lane records `/plan` entering plan mode for real, the model calling `exit_plan_mode`, the decision card taking the composer (asserting the generic flow did **not** claim the request), and the card's own Approve completing the turn — two keyless goldens, the waiting card and the approved transcript.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-plan-review-presentation-intent.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+# Agent Note：计划审阅是一次决定，不是一道题
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-30-plan-review-presentation-intent.md) | 中文
+
+## 问题
+
+`exit_plan_mode` 通过 `ctx.userInteraction.ask()` 把写好的计划交给用户审阅，而这正是 `ask_user_question` 使用的同一个 seam。在 Web GUI 上，这导致计划审阅渲染为[ask-question Web 呈现](2026-07-29-ask-question-web-presentation.md)里的通用问题流程：一个 `1 / 1` 分页器、计划作为问题的补充说明、两个裁决作为带描述的编号单选行、一行"其他，请填写自定义答案"，以及底部的 `跳过本题` / `提交`。
+
+这些可交互元素对这个界面而言无一正确。审阅一份计划是对一份文档做一次决定，而做题式的界面告诉用户他正在被考试，而不是被请求批准一份工作 —— 实际反馈是"让人很困惑以为在做题"。分页控件在给只有一项的集合分页。跳过并不是该工具接受的结果（它会折叠成继续规划）。最糟的是，这个界面完全没有暗示这就是计划关口，而旁边的等待审批接管早就具备了一次决定该有的形状：一条带色条带说明正在决定什么、主体是决定的对象、右对齐的操作行。
+
+## 决定
+
+一个问题可以声明**呈现意图（presentation intent）**，Web 输入区把已声明的意图渲染为它自己的界面。`AskUserQuestionItem` 新增 `intent?: AskUserQuestionIntent`，一个带标签的形状，目前唯一成员是 `{ kind: 'plan-review', approve: string }`；`plan-mode` 在审阅问题上设置它，并指明 `Approve` 是表示批准的标签。
+
+意图只塑造呈现。回答协议不变：遵循意图的 UI 回答的仍是通用 UI 会发送的那些选项标签，因此无论由哪个界面收集，`exit_plan_mode` 读到的都是同一种回答形状；而不认识某个标签的 UI 渲染通用流程，除布局之外一无所失。
+
+`approve` 指名肯定选项，而不依赖选项顺序，因此没有任何 UI 会从位置推断裁决。意图作出的两项断言超出类型的表达能力，`UserInteractionService.ask()` 都以 `BAD_INTENT` 在提问方一侧拒绝：`approve` 未命中该问题自身的任一选项 —— 早于任何 UI 回答一个从未被提供过的选择；以及意图落在没有 `detail` 的问题上，而 `detail` 正是它自称在审阅的东西，那会让用户去批准一件看不见的事。在协议格式（wire format）上意图是可辨识联合，因此无法识别的标签是被拒绝的帧，而不是静默退回通用渲染。
+
+`ui-question` 把该意图渲染为 `PlanReviewPanel`，沿用等待审批卡片的语言：琥珀色条带写着 `Plan review`，计划是可滚动的 markdown 主体，决定行放三个操作 —— `Chat about it`、`Refuse`、`Approve`。问题文本成为卡片的无障碍名称而非标题，因为按钮已经说明了这次决定是什么。Approve 与 Refuse 用提问方自己的选项标签回答，并把提问方的描述保留为 tooltip；`Chat about it` 取消该请求，从而让输入区归位，用户直接说他想说的话即可。所有文案在既有 `question` 命名空间下双语。
+
+路由住在单一输入区条目内部（由 `QuestionComposer` 选择形状），而不是第二个链式注册；`planReviewOf` 仅在卡片能够发出该请求允许的每一个答案时才接管：只有一个问题且声明了意图、以 `detail` 承载计划、提供了被指名的批准标签，且是二元单选 —— 除批准外最多一个选项，且非多选。出现第三个选项或多选批次时，其答案是两个按钮无法表达的，通用流程保留它，也保留其他任何卡片渲染不了的请求。因此"只塑造呈现"是字面意义上的：意图绝不让用户失去一个可达的答案，而位于协议边界下游的客户端让每个请求都保持可回答。
+
+放弃审阅成为面向模型的独立结果。`ASK_CANCELLED` 以前传到模型的是"the user cancelled ask_user_question"，指名了一个它从未调用的工具；现在 `exit_plan_mode` 报告用户放弃审阅是为了改用说话，并要求留在 plan mode 中等待。其余每一种 ask 失败 —— 轮次取消或提供方拆卸导致的中止，那里并没有用户会来 —— 保留它们自己的消息。
+
+## 备选方案
+
+**让计划审阅成为自己的待处理种类（`plan-review/requested`）。** 否决：对一个呈现问题来说尺寸不对。它换来的是诚实的响应形状（approve / decline / discuss 而非一批回答），代价是第三个 `PendingKind`、新的 requested/resolved 帧与 schema、一个 api-proxy 注册表与响应分支、客户端会话与基线重放处理，以及为一个问题协议已能表达的决定新增一个三包能力 seam。只有当计划审阅长出回答形状承载不了的结果时才值得重新考虑。
+
+**按问题的 `id` 或 `header`（`plan-review` / `Plan review`）路由卡片。** 否决：这是跨协议边界嗅探另一个包的文案字符串，任何措辞改动都会静默破坏它。意图才是让路由可读的那个声明。
+
+**约定选项顺序，让卡片把第 0 个位置读作批准。** 否决：这是包边界上的位置约定，在类型和协议帧里都看不见，也无法强制 —— 生产方一旦重排选项，就会颠倒用户的裁决。指名标签只花一个字符串。
+
+**为计划卡片注册第二个输入区链条目。** 否决：两个条目会对同一个待回答问题载体做选择，使界面取决于链优先级、以及计划包的客户端半边是否被组合。一个自己挑形状的条目不会和自己抢，而通用流程正是内建的回退。
+
+**把面板放在 `ui-plan` 里、紧挨计划状态标签。** 否决：面板的全部行为就是问题载体的回答编码（`PendingQuestion`），那是 `ui-question` 拥有的；意图是问题协议的字段，不是 plan-mode 的私有通道。渲染已声明的意图属于拥有问题渲染的那个包，正如工具渲染意图属于工具渲染方。
+
+**与 `ui-conversation` 的 `ApprovalPanel` 抽出共享的接管卡片。** 未做：两个接管在 token 和几何上一致，但内容不一致 —— 这边的主体是可滚动 markdown，那边是一行标题加一行命令 —— 共享外壳只会剩两个元素宽。它们靠 token 保持一致，而不是靠组件。
+
+**给 `Chat about it` 自己的协议结果。** 否决：放弃一个请求是通用流程已有的动词（取消整批的 `×`）。把它提升为带标签的按钮属于呈现；为它发明第四种协议结果不属于。
+
+## 结果
+
+问题协议从此带有一个呈现轴。新增第二个意图 = 联合上的一个标签、一个设置它的生产方、一个 schema 成员、一个面板 —— 不需要新的帧、服务或回答形状。代价是问题 seam 从此知道"呈现"这件事存在，且 `ui-question` 知道"plan"这个词；两者都是由单一条目拥有全部问题界面所要付的价钱。
+
+计划关口读起来就像计划关口：计划是卡片的内容，裁决是两个带标签的按钮，把轮次拿回来是第三个。通用流程对其他每个问题都未受影响，其已提交的 golden 也没有变动。
+
+客户端半边早于本次改动的部署仍然显示做题式布局 —— 正确、可回答、只是没有专门样式 —— 因为意图是增量的，而回退就是通用流程。
+
+## 测试
+
+`ui-question` 测试钉住收窄（单问题批、意图存在、计划作为 detail、被指名的批准标签确实被提供、二元单选、只提供批准时 decline 缺席）与面板（条带、markdown 计划、无障碍名称、无分页/单选/跳过/自定义、批准与拒绝用提问方的标签回答、放弃触发取消、一次性闭锁在回执被拒时重新武装并给出消息、tooltip 有与无、两种语言）。`user-interaction` 测试钉住两种 `BAD_INTENT` 拒绝与意图透传；`plan-mode` 测试钉住已声明的意图与其自身选项列表的一致、以及两条失败消息；apiproxy schema 测试钉住协议接受与未知标签的拒绝。
+
+`plan-review` Web e2e 通道录制了 `/plan` 真实进入 plan mode、模型调用 `exit_plan_mode`、决定卡片接管输入区（并断言通用流程**没有**接管该请求）、以及卡片自身的 Approve 完成该轮 —— 两份无密钥 golden：等待中的卡片与批准后的会话记录。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-web-result-card.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-web-result-card.md
+2026-07-30-web-result-card.md: deec27832aba2d5d868889f7306cbaef4f0b90b4
+2026-07-30-web-result-card.zh.md: 037e029332fbb665d90860d7e11c2fd117e6eb45

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-web-result-card.md

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+# Agent Note: Web result card — a structured render intent for web_search and web_fetch
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-30-web-result-card.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+The `web_search` and `web_fetch` tools each declared a generic pending card (`presentCall`, `kind: 'search'`/`'fetch'`) but no `presentResult`, so a completed web call reached a UI only as the model-facing render text. For a web frontend that wants to render a citation list or a fetch summary, that text is lossy: `web_search`'s render collapses each source's `title`, `snippet`, and `publishedAt` into one free-text markdown line labelled by title OR hostname (`formatSearchOutput` in `packages/web/tool-web/src/search.ts`), so reparsing the render cannot recover the per-source fields; and `web_fetch`'s render carries `url` and `statusCode` only in a header line. The render-intent contract ([tagged union](../architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md)) had no arm a web tool could declare to carry a structured result.
+
+## Decision
+
+Add one `card: 'web'` result arm to `ToolResultView` (`packages/core/tools/src/presentation.ts`), a union `WebResultView = WebSearchResultView | WebFetchResultView` discriminated by a `kind: 'search' | 'fetch'` field, plus a `WebSource` shape for one citeable source. Both tools now declare `presentResult`.
+
+One tag with a `kind` discriminant, not two tags. Both calls are web retrieval and a web frontend renders them with one component family (a retrieval card whose body differs by kind), so a shared `card` keeps every card consumer's switch to one added arm and lets the frontend branch on `kind` inside it. Two tags would force every present and future consumer to add two arms for what is one visual family. The `kind` values match the two tools' existing generic call-view `kind`s, so a call and its result read as the same category.
+
+`presentationMeta` carries what render text cannot. The structured result object a tool returns from `execute` does NOT reach a client over the wire — only the model-facing `render` text and, when declared, the `output.presentationMeta` JSON projected onto the `tool/result` event's `meta` do. For `web_search` the meta is the ONLY faithful route to `{url, title?, snippet?, publishedAt?}`: the render collapses those fields into one lossy free-text line, so a consumer cannot reparse them. For `web_fetch` the meta is a smaller but real gain: `url`/`statusCode` are recoverable from the deterministic `Fetched <url> (HTTP <n>)` header line, but `truncated` is the effective truncation — provider cap, pre-conversion source cut, or the deployment's `fetchMaxOutputChars` output cap — which a client cannot recompute because it does not know that cap. The fetch card and the model-facing text derive `truncated` from one shared `renderFetchOutput(result, maxOutputChars)` helper, so the card never disagrees with the footer the model saw. This mirrors the write/edit diff template (`packages/fs/tool-fs/src/diff.ts`): a `*MetaFromValue` projector feeds `output.presentationMeta`, and a `*MetaFromResult` narrower reads `result.meta` back with a defensive fallback to the generic card. `web_fetch`'s body is already markdown in the result content, so it is not duplicated into meta.
+
+Neither result view carries a `content` copy. A UI that does not render the structured `web` card falls back to the raw `tool/result` content. The TUI does exactly this: it renders no structured web body, and its transcript renderer routes a `web` view's fallback content through the same dim Markdown path as a generic card's content (`packages/ui/tui/src/components/transcript.ts`, where both `render` and `renderBody` narrow the `generic` arm to `view.content` and give a `web` view the same `this.result?.content` fallback). Copying the result content into the view would duplicate up to `fetchMaxOutputChars` characters on the same delivered frame for no gain (the same rejection the meta section applies to the fetch body), so the views omit it and the fallback path renders the identical text. Each view sets its result-state `title` from the call args (`args.query` / `args.url`) so a window-truncated replay that dropped the call head still has a title, the way write/edit reset title at result time.
+
+`presentResult` returns `undefined` (the generic card) on an error result and on absent or malformed `meta`, because presentation runs on replay of arbitrary logged results (possibly from an older schema) and must never throw. The narrowers validate every field defensively; an empty source list is valid meta, not malformed.
+
+## Consequences
+
+The web frontend consumer is a separate later PR: this PR adds the contract arm and makes the two tools emit it, with no client-side rendering. The one observable change is that the `web_search`/`web_fetch` `tool/result` events now persist a `data.meta` payload (the `web-fetch` keyless snapshot is refreshed accordingly); the model-facing render text and the TUI presentation are unchanged (the TUI falls back to the same result content). The assembled-application transcript snapshot that exercises a `web` card belongs to the consumer PR that renders it, delivered there. Any existing `ToolResultView` consumer that switches exhaustively must add a `web` arm; the TUI does not switch exhaustively and needs none. `apiproxy`'s session schema already accepts any `card` string (`packages/host/apiproxy/src/api/sessions.schema.ts`), so the new view crosses the wire without a schema change.
+
+A future web tool that wants this card declares `presentResult` returning a `card: 'web'` view with its own `kind`; adding a third `kind` is a union edit plus the frontend's branch, not a new card tag.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**Two card tags (`web-search`, `web-fetch`).** Rejected: it doubles the arm count at every card consumer for one visual family, and the two shapes already share enough (a titled retrieval card with fallback content) that a `kind` discriminant expresses the difference without a second tag.
+
+**Reparse the render text in `presentResult` instead of projecting meta.** Rejected for `web_search`: the render's source list is lossy (title-or-hostname label, snippet and date concatenated into free text), so reparsing cannot faithfully recover the structured fields. `presentationMeta` is the only route that preserves them.
+
+**Carry the fetch body in meta, or copy the result content into either view.** Rejected: the body is already the model-facing markdown in the result content, and duplicating it into meta or into a view `content` field would double the persisted or delivered payload for no gain; a UI without the `web` capability falls back to the existing result content, which is the same text.
+
+## Testing
+
+`packages/web/tool-web/tests/tool-web.spec.ts` covers, per-file to the 100% gate: `searchMetaFromValue`/`fetchMetaFromValue` projection including omission of absent optional fields, and the fetch `truncated` projection agreeing with the render footer both when only the output cap cut the body and when nothing did; `searchMetaFromResult`/`fetchMetaFromResult` narrowing with a round-trip and every malformed-shape rejection (non-object, wrong field types, a malformed source entry) plus the empty-source-list accept; `presentSearchResult`/`presentFetchResult` typed views including the args-derived title, the absence of a `content` copy, the truncated signal, the error-result fallback, and the malformed-meta fallback; and two real-registry executions asserting the tool projects the meta onto `result.meta` and its registered `presentResult` derives the `card: 'web'` view.
+
+## Related
+
+- [Tagged render-intent union for tool-call presentation](../architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md) — the `card`-tagged vocabulary this extends with the `web` arm.
+- [Web terminal card](2026-07-28-web-terminal-card.md) — the precedent that carried the bash `terminal` render intent to the browser; the web frontend consumer of this arm is its analogue, deferred to a later PR.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-web-result-card.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+# Agent Note: Web result card — a structured render intent for web_search and web_fetch
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-30-web-result-card.md) | 中文
+
+## Problem
+
+`web_search` 与 `web_fetch` 工具各自声明了一个 generic 待定卡片（`presentCall`，`kind: 'search'`/`'fetch'`），但没有 `presentResult`，因此一个已完成的 web 调用抵达 UI 时只剩下面向模型的 render 文本。对于想渲染引用列表或抓取摘要的 web 前端而言，该文本是有损的：`web_search` 的 render 把每个来源的 `title`、`snippet`、`publishedAt` 压进一行以 title 或 hostname 标注的自由文本 markdown（`packages/web/tool-web/src/search.ts` 中的 `formatSearchOutput`），因此重新解析 render 无法恢复各来源字段；`web_fetch` 的 render 也仅在一行 header 里携带 `url` 与 `statusCode`。渲染意图契约（[标签联合类型](../architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md)）此前没有一个可供 web 工具声明、用以携带结构化结果的分支。
+
+## Decision
+
+向 `ToolResultView`（`packages/core/tools/src/presentation.ts`）新增一个 `card: 'web'` 结果分支，它是以 `kind: 'search' | 'fetch'` 字段作判别的联合 `WebResultView = WebSearchResultView | WebFetchResultView`，并附一个表示单个可引用来源的 `WebSource` 形状。两个工具现在都声明 `presentResult`。
+
+采用一个标签加 `kind` 判别，而非两个标签。两个调用都是 web 检索，web 前端会用同一族组件渲染它们（一个检索卡片，正文按 kind 不同），因此共用一个 `card` 让每个 card 消费者的 switch 只需新增一个分支，并让前端在其内部按 `kind` 分岔。两个标签会迫使当前及未来每个消费者为本属同一视觉族的东西添加两个分支。这两个 `kind` 取值与两个工具既有的 generic 调用视图 `kind` 一致，因此一个调用与它的结果读起来是同一类别。
+
+`presentationMeta` 携带 render 文本无法携带的东西。工具从 `execute` 返回的结构化结果对象**不会**经由 wire 抵达客户端——只有面向模型的 `render` 文本，以及（声明时）投影到 `tool/result` 事件 `meta` 上的 `output.presentationMeta` JSON 会。对 `web_search`，meta 是得到 `{url, title?, snippet?, publishedAt?}` 的**唯一**忠实途径：render 把这些字段压进一行有损的自由文本，消费者无法重新解析。对 `web_fetch`，meta 是更小但真实的收益：`url`/`statusCode` 可从确定格式的 `Fetched <url> (HTTP <n>)` header 行还原，但 `truncated` 是有效截断——provider cap、转换前源截断，或部署的 `fetchMaxOutputChars` 输出上限——客户端无法重算，因为它不知道那个上限。抓取卡片与面向模型的文本都从同一个 `renderFetchOutput(result, maxOutputChars)` helper 派生 `truncated`，因此卡片绝不会与模型看到的脚注分叉。这照搬 write/edit 的 diff 模板（`packages/fs/tool-fs/src/diff.ts`）：一个 `*MetaFromValue` 投影器喂给 `output.presentationMeta`，一个 `*MetaFromResult` 收窄器读回 `result.meta`，并在失败时防御性回退到 generic 卡片。`web_fetch` 的正文已是结果内容中的 markdown，因此不重复写入 meta。
+
+两个结果视图都不携带 `content` 副本。不渲染结构化 `web` 卡片的 UI 回退到原始 `tool/result` 内容。TUI 正是如此：它不渲染结构化的 web 正文，其 transcript 渲染器把 `web` 视图的回退内容与 generic 卡片的内容路由进同一条 dim Markdown 路径（`packages/ui/tui/src/components/transcript.ts` 中 `render` 与 `renderBody` 都把 `generic` 分支收窄为 `view.content`，并给 `web` 视图相同的 `this.result?.content` 回退）。把结果内容复制进视图会在同一投递帧上重复最多 `fetchMaxOutputChars` 个字符却毫无收益（与 meta 一节对抓取正文的否决同理），因此视图省略它，回退路径渲染完全相同的文本。每个视图从调用参数设置其结果期 `title`（`args.query`／`args.url`），因此丢掉了调用头的窗口截断重放仍有标题，与 write/edit 在结果期重设 title 的做法一致。
+
+`presentResult` 在错误结果、以及 `meta` 缺失或畸形时返回 `undefined`（即 generic 卡片），因为 presentation 会在对任意已记录结果（可能来自旧 schema）的重放中运行，绝不能抛错。收窄器防御性地校验每个字段；空来源列表是有效 meta，而非畸形。
+
+## Consequences
+
+web 前端消费者是一个独立的后续 PR：本 PR 新增契约分支并让两个工具发出它，不含客户端渲染。唯一可观察的变化是 `web_search`/`web_fetch` 的 `tool/result` 事件现在持久化一个 `data.meta` 载荷（`web-fetch` keyless 快照随之刷新）；面向模型的 render 文本与 TUI 呈现不变（TUI 回退到相同的结果内容）。渲染 `web` 卡片的组装应用 transcript 快照属于渲染它的消费者 PR，在那里交付。任何做穷尽 switch 的现有 `ToolResultView` 消费者都必须新增一个 `web` 分支；TUI 并不穷尽 switch，无需新增。`apiproxy` 的会话 schema 已接受任意 `card` 字符串（`packages/host/apiproxy/src/api/sessions.schema.ts`），因此新视图无需 schema 变更即可跨 wire。
+
+未来想用此卡片的 web 工具，声明一个返回带自有 `kind` 的 `card: 'web'` 视图的 `presentResult`；新增第三个 `kind` 是一次联合类型编辑加前端的分岔，而非一个新的 card 标签。
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**两个 card 标签（`web-search`、`web-fetch`）。** 否决：它在每个 card 消费者处为一个视觉族翻倍分支数，而两个形状已共享得够多（一个带回退内容的带标题检索卡片），`kind` 判别无需第二个标签即可表达差异。
+
+**在 `presentResult` 里重新解析 render 文本，而非投影 meta。** 对 `web_search` 否决：render 的来源列表是有损的（title 或 hostname 标签，snippet 与日期拼进自由文本），因此重新解析无法忠实恢复结构化字段。`presentationMeta` 是唯一保留它们的途径。
+
+**把抓取正文放进 meta，或把结果内容复制进任一视图。** 否决：正文已是结果内容中面向模型的 markdown，把它复制进 meta 或视图的 `content` 字段会为无收益的目的翻倍持久化或投递载荷；不具备 `web` 能力的 UI 回退到既有的结果内容，那是相同的文本。
+
+## Testing
+
+`packages/web/tool-web/tests/tool-web.spec.ts` 覆盖以下内容，满足按文件 100% 的门禁：`searchMetaFromValue`/`fetchMetaFromValue` 投影，含对缺席可选字段的省略，以及抓取 `truncated` 投影在仅输出上限截断正文时、以及在毫无截断时都与 render 脚注一致；`searchMetaFromResult`/`fetchMetaFromResult` 收窄，含一次往返与每种畸形形状的拒绝（非对象、字段类型错误、畸形来源条目）以及空来源列表的接受；`presentSearchResult`/`presentFetchResult` 类型化视图，含从参数派生的 title、无 `content` 副本、truncated 信号、错误结果回退与畸形 meta 回退；以及两次真实注册表执行，断言工具把 meta 投影到 `result.meta` 上，其注册的 `presentResult` 推导出 `card: 'web'` 视图。
+
+## Related
+
+- [标签化的工具调用渲染意图联合类型](../architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md) —— 本卡片以 `web` 分支扩展的 `card` 标签词汇表。
+- [Web terminal card](2026-07-28-web-terminal-card.md) —— 把 bash `terminal` 渲染意图带到浏览器的先例；本分支的 web 前端消费者是它的对应物，推迟到后续 PR。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-web-tool-row-unified-expand-and-inspect.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-web-tool-row-unified-expand-and-inspect.md
+2026-07-30-web-tool-row-unified-expand-and-inspect.md: ba2f4ead8023772fad578ca0b647241ecc332905
+2026-07-30-web-tool-row-unified-expand-and-inspect.zh.md: ac4835c7429a3ff7d3042f73d26d267911533132

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-web-tool-row-unified-expand-and-inspect.md

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+# Agent Note: Web tool-row unified expand and trajectory Inspect
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-30-web-tool-row-unified-expand-and-inspect.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+The chat view's tool rows had drifted into per-surface interaction dialects: ToolRow expanded through a leading-icon toggle and only for calls with an args body, the bash sample had its own expand affordance, todo/ask-question rows expanded raw args only, single-file tools were not expandable at all, and a call's OUTPUT was reachable only through the details panel. A failing bash command (exit≠0 settles `isError:false`) showed no collapsed-row failure signal. There was also no path from a chat row to its trajectory record, and switching chat → trajectory → chat lost the reader's scroll position because the tab ring unmounts inactive views.
+
+## Decision
+
+**Every expandable tool row shares one interaction — the whole row toggles (click / Enter / Space) with an icon→chevron hover preview — and one expanded body: an IN/OUT gutter-labeled card with per-section scroll caps; a hover-revealed Inspect pill jumps to the call's trajectory record through a one-shot store handoff; the chat view preserves its scroll offset across view switches through an in-memory per-session map.**
+
+- `toolRowModel` now derives result material alongside args: `output` (the `resultText` flatten, moved from DetailsPanel into the contract), and `errorSummary` (the failure's first line, shown as the collapsed summary in the error color). A row with body, output, or terminal material is expandable; the row itself is the toggle (`role="button"`, `aria-expanded`), and file-path summaries stay independent links via `stopPropagation`.
+- The expanded card (figma 1249:35657) is a column of IN/OUT sections: each section is its own scrollport (max-height 150px) with a sticky gutter label, and the l2 divider spans the full card width. Think prose and the run_code CodeBlock keep their non-card bodies; context injection reuses the row with a label-less `plainBody` card.
+- `terminalFailed` reads a settled terminal card's exit status so BashRow and GenericToolCard surface a failing command as the row's red state dot — the only failure signal the collapsed row has, since the call itself settles `isError:false`.
+- TerminalBlock's banner joins the same reading model: it shares the card surface (no banner token), an l2 hairline separates it from the body, the command column caps at 150px and scrolls with sticky copy/status controls top-aligned to the first prompt row.
+- Inspect: `ToolRowOwnerProps.inspect` (absent for rows without a call identity) renders a pill in real flow under the expanded body's bottom-left, revealed by hovering anywhere on the tool call. Clicking writes `{ callId }` to the chat store's one-shot `inspect` field and switches to the trajectory view; TrajectoryTable finds the record, opens its summary, and acknowledges by clearing the field.
+- Scroll preservation: the chat view saves its offset on every scroll (null when pinned to bottom) into an apply-scope `Map<SessionId, number>` exposed as `chatScroll` on the injected props; the open-jump branch restores it on remount. Deliberately not persisted — a fresh page load keeps the open-jump-to-bottom default.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**Keeping the leading-icon toggle and per-registrant expand affordances.** Rejected: three surfaces had already diverged; the registrant posture (bash sample replicates CSS locally) makes drift permanent unless the interaction contract itself is uniform and small — whole-row toggle plus hover preview.
+
+**Routing Inspect through a URL or a trajectory-view prop.** Rejected: the view ring renders through the slot registry, so the two views share no parent that could carry a prop; the chat store already crosses that boundary and the one-shot field keeps the handoff replay-safe (persisted snapshots from before the field rehydrate with `?? null`).
+
+**Persisting the chat scroll offset.** Rejected: restoring a days-old offset into a conversation that has since grown reads as a bug; the in-memory map scopes the memory to exactly the view-switch case that loses it.
+
+**A per-row expanded OUTPUT fetched from the details panel's material.** Unnecessary: the settled result node already rides the snapshot's frozen call slice, so the contract-level `resultText` flatten serves both the row and the panel from one derivation.
+
+## Consequences
+
+Any registered toolview gets input AND output inspection in place, with the details panel and trajectory remaining the deep-dive surfaces. The unified interaction is contract-visible (`ToolRowProps.output/errorSummary/inspect`), so third-party rows opt in by passing model fields through. The bash sample intentionally re-replicates the new CSS (registrant posture), so future interaction changes still touch it by hand. `--dsw-font-markdown-code-block-small` (12/18) is a hand-added token pending a design-platform export. The web-cordis `distIndex` fix (plain concatenation, not URL.pathname) unblocks preview boots from a cwd with spaces.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-web-tool-row-unified-expand-and-inspect.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+# Agent Note：Web 工具行统一展开交互与 trajectory Inspect
+
+状态：已实现
+
+[English](2026-07-30-web-tool-row-unified-expand-and-inspect.md) | 中文
+
+## 问题
+
+聊天视图的工具行交互已经分裂成多种方言：ToolRow 通过前导图标切换展开、且仅限有 args body 的调用，bash 示例有自己的一套展开方式，todo / ask-question 行只能展开原始 args，单文件工具完全不可展开，而调用的 OUTPUT 只能通过右侧详情面板查看。失败的 bash 命令（exit≠0 但结算为 `isError:false`）在折叠行上没有任何失败信号。此外聊天行没有跳转到 trajectory 记录的入口，且 chat → trajectory → chat 切换会丢失阅读位置（标签环会卸载非活跃视图）。
+
+## 决定
+
+**所有可展开工具行共享同一交互——整行即开关（点击 / Enter / 空格），图标 hover 时渐变为 chevron 预览——以及同一展开体：带 IN/OUT 侧栏标签的卡片，各分区独立滚动上限；hover 显示的 Inspect 胶囊通过 store 的一次性交接跳到该调用的 trajectory 记录；聊天视图用内存态的按会话 Map 在视图切换间保留滚动位置。**
+
+- `toolRowModel` 在 args 之外同时派生结果材料：`output`（`resultText` 拍平逻辑从 DetailsPanel 移入 contract）和 `errorSummary`（失败首行，以错误色作为折叠摘要）。有 body、output 或 terminal 材料的行即可展开；行本身是开关（`role="button"`、`aria-expanded`），文件路径摘要通过 `stopPropagation` 保持独立链接。
+- 展开卡片（figma 1249:35657）是 IN/OUT 分区列：每个分区是独立滚动区（max-height 150px），侧栏标签 sticky 固定，l2 分割线横贯整卡宽度。Think 的推理文本和 run_code 的 CodeBlock 保持非卡片体；上下文注入复用此行并以无标签的 `plainBody` 卡片展开。
+- `terminalFailed` 读取已结算 terminal 卡片的退出状态，让 BashRow 和 GenericToolCard 把失败命令显示为行的红色状态点——这是折叠行唯一的失败信号，因为调用本身结算为 `isError:false`。
+- TerminalBlock 的横幅并入同一阅读模型：与卡片共用同一表面（不再用 banner token），与正文之间是 l2 细线，命令列上限 150px 内部滚动，复制/状态控件 sticky 且顶对齐第一行提示符。
+- Inspect：`ToolRowOwnerProps.inspect`（无调用身份的行不提供）在展开体左下角以真实布局位置渲染胶囊，hover 整个 tool call 任意位置显示。点击将 `{ callId }` 写入 chat store 的一次性 `inspect` 字段并切换到 trajectory 视图；TrajectoryTable 找到记录、打开其摘要，并通过清空字段确认。
+- 滚动保留：聊天视图在每次滚动时保存偏移（贴底时为 null）到 apply 作用域的 `Map<SessionId, number>`，经注入 props 的 `chatScroll` 暴露；重挂载时 open-jump 分支恢复它。刻意不持久化——新页面加载保持打开即贴底的默认行为。
+
+## 曾考虑的替代方案
+
+**保留前导图标开关和各注册方自有的展开方式。** 否决：三个表面已经分化；注册方姿态（bash 示例本地复刻 CSS）意味着除非交互契约本身统一且足够小——整行开关加 hover 预览——否则漂移会永久存在。
+
+**通过 URL 或 trajectory 视图 prop 传递 Inspect。** 否决：视图环经由 slot 注册表渲染，两个视图没有可携带 prop 的共同父级；chat store 本就跨越该边界，一次性字段让交接可安全重放（字段出现之前的持久化快照以 `?? null` 复水）。
+
+**持久化聊天滚动偏移。** 否决：把几天前的偏移恢复到已经增长的会话里读起来像 bug；内存 Map 把记忆精确限定在会丢位置的视图切换场景。
+
+**从详情面板的材料为每行单独取展开 OUTPUT。** 不必要：已结算结果节点本就在快照的冻结调用切片上，contract 层的 `resultText` 拍平让行和面板共用一份派生。
+
+## 后果
+
+任何已注册 toolview 都能就地查看输入与输出，详情面板和 trajectory 仍是深查表面。统一交互契约可见（`ToolRowProps.output/errorSummary/inspect`），第三方行透传模型字段即可接入。bash 示例有意重新复刻新 CSS（注册方姿态），未来交互变更仍需手动同步它。`--dsw-font-markdown-code-block-small`（12/18）是手工补充的 token，待设计平台导出后替换。web-cordis 的 `distIndex` 修复（纯拼接而非 URL.pathname）解除了含空格 cwd 下预览无法启动的问题。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-web-telemetry-default-mount.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-web-telemetry-default-mount.md
+2026-07-31-web-telemetry-default-mount.md: 6c1fdaa8719ee01726b51db9a469ff659cbac476
+2026-07-31-web-telemetry-default-mount.zh.md: b447832527ba9731097cd0776060db11ee4dfc30

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-web-telemetry-default-mount.md

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+# Agent Note: Default session-telemetry mount (OTel reporting) in the dsh web composition
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-31-web-telemetry-default-mount.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+The telemetry seam and OTel backend ([revival Note](2026-07-23-session-telemetry-otel-revival.md)) had never been wired into any deployment composition since completion: no roster row, no switch, no cadence ruling, and zero observability over user sessions for the internal deployment. A deployment decision was needed: which surfaces report, to where, on what cadence, how to opt out, and how CI stays isolated.
+
+## Decision
+
+The shared `dsh` core (`apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml`) mounts the `telemetry-otel` row by default with a baked-in production endpoint, so every surface — TUI, web, and headless — reports; this is the **internal-testing deployment stance** — reporting is on when an endpoint exists, and users opt out through the environment. Each surface's exit path drains the queue: web/headless dispose on SIGINT/SIGTERM (headless gained those handlers in this change), and the TUI's normal exit runs `disposeRootAndExit` (root dispose, 5s bounded — above the ~1s drain ceiling configured here) while its `/resume` handoff disposes the root before `execve`.
+
+| Ruling | Value | Rationale |
+|---|---|---|
+| Mount surface | base.cordis.yml (TUI + web + headless) | One deployment stance for every surface; per-surface divergence would need a reason, and none exists |
+| Endpoint | `DSH_TELEMETRY_OTLP_URL`, default `https://harness-telemetry.deepseeksvc.com/v1/logs` | Internal collector; the env override serves local/dev runs |
+| Opt-out switch | any non-empty `DSH_TELEMETRY_DISABLED` (including `0`/`false`) disables | A privacy switch prefers off-by-mistake over on-by-mistake; a row can only be disabled at AppCLIEntry's patch layer (config has no disable semantic, and the switch must precede the load-time `exporter.url` validation) |
+| Cadence | `processor.scheduledDelayMillis: 10000` (10s/batch) | Streaming while the session runs, never exit-time-only; a crash loses at most the last unexported interval |
+| Exit-drain bound | `exporter.timeoutMillis: 1000` + `maxExportBatchSize: 2048` (== maxQueueSize) + `exportTimeoutMillis: 1500` | Dispose must release within ~1s against an unreachable collector: timeoutMillis doubles as the per-attempt socket timeout and the retry deadline (1s effectively disables the SDK's 5-try backoff), and aligning batch size with the queue cap makes the drain a single batch; SDK defaults can stall 40s+ |
+| Compression | `compression: gzip` | Event bodies carry full content; cross-datacenter bandwidth |
+| CI isolation | top-level `env: DSH_TELEMETRY_DISABLED: '1'` in all 8 GitHub workflows | Every CI channel that boots the web composition (e2e/snapshot/built smokes) must not stream test sessions to the production endpoint |
+
+The keyless integration test `apps/cli/tests/telemetry-web.e2e.ts` pins the deployment-level behavior: an in-test OTLP collector plus a mock LLM server, a real `dsh web` boot, asserting ledger coverage, seq monotonicity, the first-of-step chunk projection, and the ops `shutdown` marker arriving through the SIGINT drain.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**No default mount; deployments add the row themselves (continuing the SDK stance).** Rejected for this stage: this repo's web/headless composition IS the internal deployment, and default-on reporting is that deployment's product requirement; the SDK stance survives in the seam packages (unmounted = nothing leaves).
+
+**A config field instead of an env patch for the switch.** Infeasible: cordis rows have no config-level disable semantic, and `exporter.url` validation fails loud at plugin construction, so the switch must take effect before the Loader — AppCLIEntry's patch layer is the only seat.
+
+**A `Promise.race` timeout backstop around exit.** Deferred: the parameter set already bounds the worst-case drain to ~1.5-3s (typically <100ms), measured SIGINT-to-exit 110ms-1.1s; the unbounded drip-feed-response risk stays under observation, and on real evidence the race lands inside the backend's `shutdown()` (never the coordinator — that would decide loss semantics for every backend).
+
+## Consequences
+
+- A developer running `dsh web` without a local collector POSTs to the production endpoint every 10s (silent failure when unreachable; no OTel diag logger is registered); local development sets `DSH_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1` or points `DSH_TELEMETRY_OTLP_URL` locally.
+- **No redaction rule is mounted yet**: exports are the raw captured copy (full user/assistant message text, tool arguments and results, the system prompt, the local `session.cwd` path). Crossing a trust boundary requires `telemetry/record` rules first — the redaction rule, identity Resource attributes (hostname / anonymous user id / surface), and the usage-metrics track are the explicit follow-ups of this decision.
+- Test rigs reusing this tree (e.g. `apps/web/tests/scaffold.ts`) must explicitly disable the row, or fixture sessions stream to whatever collector the environment happens to name.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-web-telemetry-default-mount.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+# Agent Note: dsh web 组合默认挂载会话遥测（OTel 上报）
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-31-web-telemetry-default-mount.md) | 中文
+
+## Problem
+
+遥测 seam 与 OTel backend（[revival Note](2026-07-23-session-telemetry-otel-revival.md)）自完成以来从未接入任何部署组合：没有 roster 行、没有开关、没有节奏口径，内部部署对用户会话零可观测。需要一个部署决策：哪些 surface 上报、报到哪、什么节奏、怎么关、CI 怎么隔离。
+
+## Decision
+
+`dsh` 共享核心（`apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml`）默认挂载 `telemetry-otel` 行，内置生产 endpoint，因此所有 surface——TUI、web、headless——都上报；这是**内部测试期的部署立场**——有 endpoint 就报，用户可经环境变量退出。各 surface 的退出路径都会排空队列：web/headless 在 SIGINT/SIGTERM 上 dispose（headless 的信号处理是本次补上的），TUI 的正常退出走 `disposeRootAndExit`（根 dispose，5s 兜底——高于此处配置的 ~1s drain 上界），其 `/resume` 移交也在 `execve` 前 dispose 根。
+
+| 决策项 | 取值 | 理由 |
+|---|---|---|
+| 挂载面 | base.cordis.yml（TUI + web + headless） | 所有 surface 一个部署立场；按 surface 分化需要理由，而当前没有 |
+| endpoint | `DSH_TELEMETRY_OTLP_URL`，缺省 `https://harness-telemetry.deepseeksvc.com/v1/logs` | 内部 collector；env 覆盖供本地/联调 |
+| 退出开关 | `DSH_TELEMETRY_DISABLED` 非空（含 `0`/`false`）即关 | 隐私向开关取「宁关勿误开」；行级 disable 只能在 AppCLIEntry 的 patch 层做（config 无 disable 语义，且必须先于 `exporter.url` 的加载期校验生效） |
+| 上报节奏 | `processor.scheduledDelayMillis: 10000`（10s/批） | 流式回流，非退出才报；崩溃至多丢最后一个未导出间隔 |
+| 退出 drain 上界 | `exporter.timeoutMillis: 1000` + `maxExportBatchSize: 2048（== maxQueueSize）` + `exportTimeoutMillis: 1500` | collector 不可达时 dispose 必须 ~1s 内放行：timeoutMillis 同时是单次 socket 超时与重试 deadline（1s 等效关掉 SDK 5 次 backoff），批大小对齐队列上限使 drain 恒为单批；默认参数下最坏可卡 40s+ |
+| 压缩 | `compression: gzip` | 事件 body 含全文，跨机房带宽 |
+| CI 隔离 | 全部 8 个 GitHub workflow 顶层 `env: DSH_TELEMETRY_DISABLED: '1'` | CI 启动 web 组合的所有通道（e2e/snapshot/built smoke）不得向生产 endpoint 泄测试会话 |
+
+集成测试 `apps/cli/tests/telemetry-web.e2e.ts`（keyless）钉住部署级行为：测试内 OTLP collector + mock LLM，真启动 `dsh web`，断言 ledger 覆盖、seq 单调、chunk 首条投影、以及 SIGINT drain 后 ops `shutdown` 标记到达。
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**默认不挂载，部署方自行加行（SDK 立场的延续）。** 否决于当前阶段：本仓的 web/headless 组合就是内部部署本身，「上报默认开」是这个部署的产品要求；SDK 立场仍由 seam 包保持（不挂 = 零外发）。
+
+**开关做成 config 字段而非 env patch。** 不可行：cordis 行没有 config 层的 disable 语义，且 `exporter.url` 校验在插件构造期 fail-loud，开关必须在 Loader 之前生效——AppCLIEntry patch 层是唯一落点。
+
+**退出时 `Promise.race` 兜底超时。** 暂缓：参数组合已把最坏 drain 压到 ~1.5-3s（典型 <100ms），实测 SIGINT→退出 110ms-1.1s；drip-feed 慢滴响应的无界等待风险留观，出现实证再在 backend `shutdown()` 内加 race（不放 coordinator——那会替所有 backend 决定丢失语义）。
+
+## Consequences
+
+- 无本地 collector 的开发者跑 `dsh web` 会对生产 endpoint 每 10s 发一次 POST（联不通则静默失败，OTel diag logger 未注册）；本地开发设 `DSH_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1` 或 `DSH_TELEMETRY_OTLP_URL` 指本地。
+- **当前零脱敏规则挂载**：导出即原始捕获副本（用户/助手消息全文、工具参数与结果、system prompt、`session.cwd` 本地路径）。跨信任边界前必须挂 `telemetry/record` 规则——脱敏规则、身份 Resource 维度（hostname/匿名 user id/surface）、使用数据 metrics 轨三件是本决策明确的后续工作。
+- 复用这棵树的测试载具（如 `apps/web/tests/scaffold.ts`）须显式关停该行，否则 fixture 会话会流向 env 里碰巧存在的 collector。

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-06-node-engine-floor.i18n.yaml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
-#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
-2026-07-06-node-engine-floor.md: f1754ea7ca32452a04c6cd8a0599568f602e47dd
-2026-07-06-node-engine-floor.zh.md: 9d376a639378d3a0b9b645aa36c1a5d320d1d147
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-06-node-engine-floor.md
+2026-07-06-node-engine-floor.md: ef047d885a442106a35922f4716d2996d8a98ca7
+2026-07-06-node-engine-floor.zh.md: a0281addf7d4327d7f6ea30e3a3f0f40d6782bd0

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-06-node-engine-floor.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ The Node 22 branch of the root `engines.node` range is a contract for the instal
 
 ## Decision
 
-Set `engines.node` to `^22.19.0 || >=24.0.0` and test the keyless CI compatibility matrix on `['22.19', 24, 26]`. Every matrix leg runs the TypeScript typecheck plus a keyless source-mode worker smoke, so the floor is exercised through both a complete source typecheck and a real unbuilt runtime path. The real-API e2e workflow stays on Node 24 because it exercises API integration rather than the runtime floor.
+Set `engines.node` to `^22.19.0 || >=24.0.0` and test keyless CI on `['22.19', 24, 26]`. The primary Node 24 jobs own the complete typecheck and unit coverage inventory; every version runs focused source-worker, Zstandard, source-launch, and [jsdom storage](../testing/2026-07-30-vitest-jsdom-webstorage-ownership.md) smokes without repeating that inventory. The real-API e2e workflow stays on Node 24 because it exercises API integration rather than the runtime floor.
 
 Two Node features gate the source runtime:
 
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Those source features clear on the 22.x line at **22.18**, but the installed Pi
 ## Consequences
 
 - The advertised LTS branch no longer undercuts the Pi adapter dependency floor.
-- CI proves the Node 22 LTS floor directly with Node 22.19, keeps the Node 24 branch on `node: 24`, and keeps Node 26 for the next even line; each leg typechecks the source graph and launches the unbuilt workflow worker for real.
+- CI proves the Node 22 LTS floor directly with Node 22.19, keeps primary coverage on `node: 24`, and exercises Node 26 as the next even line; focused compatibility smokes run on all three versions.
 - The built-bin smoke needs no version-conditional flag: at 22.19 type-stripping is already the default, so the test stays the plain `node lib/bin.js` path it documents.
 - A future dependency or source API that raises the runtime floor must move `engines.node`, the compatibility matrix, and this Agent Note in the same change.
 

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-06-node-engine-floor.zh.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 决策
 
-将 `engines.node` 设为 `^22.19.0 || >=24.0.0`，并在 keyless CI 兼容性矩阵中测试 `['22.19', 24, 26]`。每条矩阵分支都运行 TypeScript 类型检查加一次 keyless 的源码模式 worker 冒烟测试，因此引擎下限通过完整的源码类型检查和真实的未构建运行时路径两条路径得到验证。真实 API 的 e2e 工作流保持在 Node 24 上，因为它验证的是 API 集成而非运行时下限。
+将 `engines.node` 设为 `^22.19.0 || >=24.0.0`，并在 `['22.19', 24, 26]` 上运行 keyless CI。主要的 Node 24 任务负责整套类型检查和单元测试覆盖率任务；三个版本均运行 source-worker、Zstandard、source-launch 和 [jsdom 存储](../testing/2026-07-30-vitest-jsdom-webstorage-ownership.md) 专项冒烟测试，不重复这套类型检查和覆盖率任务。真实 API 的 e2e 工作流保持在 Node 24 上，因为它验证的是 API 集成而非运行时下限。
 
 两个 Node 特性决定了源码运行时的门槛：
 
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Status: implemented
 ## 后果
 
 - 宣传的 LTS 分支不再低于 Pi 适配器依赖的下限。
-- CI 通过 Node 22.19 直接验证 Node 22 LTS 下限，Node 24 分支保持 `node: 24`，Node 26 用于下一个偶数线；每条分支都对源码图执行类型检查，并实际启动未构建的工作流 worker。
+- CI 通过 Node 22.19 直接验证 Node 22 LTS 下限，将主要覆盖率任务保留在 `node: 24`，并用 Node 26 验证下一个偶数线；三个版本均运行聚焦的兼容性冒烟测试。
 - built-bin 冒烟测试无需版本条件标志：在 22.19 上类型剥离已是默认行为，因此测试保持其文档所述的纯 `node lib/bin.js` 路径。
 - 未来若依赖或源码 API 提高运行时下限，必须在同一变更中同步调整 `engines.node`、兼容性矩阵和本 Agent Note（agent 决策记录）。
 

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-30-cordis-config-source-plane-resolution-gate.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-30-cordis-config-source-plane-resolution-gate.md
+2026-07-30-cordis-config-source-plane-resolution-gate.md: f9070d39559948ef27f96df5afccd7c4e076f131
+2026-07-30-cordis-config-source-plane-resolution-gate.zh.md: fac6c4047d334d7dd0685aa270234fee3d15dba8

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-30-cordis-config-source-plane-resolution-gate.md

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+# Agent Note: verify-cordis-config gates source-plane resolution of configured plugins
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-30-cordis-config-source-plane-resolution-gate.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+`apps/cli/config/tui.cordis.yml` gained the `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui/prompt` entry without a matching tsconfig `paths` mapping. The generic `@deepseek-ai/dsh-*` wildcard substitutes `tui/prompt` whole into its `<group>/*/src` candidates, none of which exist, so the [tsx source launch](../architecture/2026-07-29-dsh-source-launch-tsx-esm.md) fell back to package `exports` and resolved `lib/prompt.js` — an artifact-plane file. Every environment with a built `lib/` (developer trees after `pnpm build`) booted fine, and the e2e workflow runs the keyless TUI PTY smoke in `lib` mode (`DSH_EXAMPLE_MODE=lib`, built bin under plain Node) so CI never exercises the source vector at all — while every clean checkout failed `pnpm dsh` at startup with `plugin(s) failed to load: @deepseek-ai/dsh-tui/prompt`. No gate checked the source plane, so the breakage shipped silently and surfaced only in fresh worktrees.
+
+## Decision
+
+`scripts/verify-cordis-config.ts` (`validateSourcePlaneResolution`) requires every configured specifier of a local workspace package — harness packages and vendored Cordis alike — to resolve through the `tsconfig.base.json` `paths` facade to a `.ts`/`.tsx` source file, using `ts.resolveModuleName` from the repository root. A failed resolution or a `.d.ts` hit (the `exports` fallback into built `lib/types`) fails `verify-cordis-config`, naming the config files and the specifier. The missing `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui/prompt` mapping is added next to the other explicit subpath entries; removing it reproduces the gate failure.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**Rely on the keyless TUI PTY smoke.** In default source mode it boots the real tree through the source vector and does catch the failure — but only on a clean tree. CI's e2e workflow runs it exclusively in `lib` mode (the built bin resolving real package `exports`), so no CI line runs the source vector, and developer trees with a stale `lib/` stay masked locally. Adding a source-mode CI smoke proves one composition per run; the static gate covers every shipped and example config.
+
+**Broaden the `dsh-source-launch-smoke` compat test to full boot.** The node-compat smoke asserts only the TTY refusal, which happens before plugin loading. A full keyless boot per matrix line duplicates the PTY smoke at higher cost and, like it, proves one composition rather than every shipped and example config.
+
+**A `@deepseek-ai/dsh-*/prompt`-style wildcard mapping.** Fixes this one subpath but not the class; the next single-file subpath export (`/surface`, `/message`, …) regresses identically. The static gate covers all current and future configured specifiers.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- A configured workspace specifier that resolves only through built `lib/` is now a red `verify-cordis-config` (in `hygiene` and CI) instead of a clean-tree-only startup crash.
+- New single-file subpath exports referenced from a cordis.yml need an explicit `tsconfig.base.json` `paths` entry at introduction time; the gate message says so.
+- The gate resolves with `tsconfig.base.json` options only; a specifier needing client-only compiler options to resolve would fail it, which matches the facade's role as the single resolution surface for tsx and vitest.

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-30-cordis-config-source-plane-resolution-gate.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+# Agent Note: verify-cordis-config 对配置中插件的源码面解析实施门禁
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-30-cordis-config-source-plane-resolution-gate.md) | 中文
+
+## 问题
+
+`apps/cli/config/tui.cordis.yml` 新增了 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui/prompt` 配置项，却没有对应的 tsconfig `paths` 映射。通用的 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-*` 通配符会把 `tui/prompt` 整体代入其 `<group>/*/src` 候选路径，而这些路径全都不存在，因此 [tsx 源码启动](../architecture/2026-07-29-dsh-source-launch-tsx-esm.md)会回退到包（package）的 `exports`，解析出产物面文件 `lib/prompt.js`。任何带有已构建 `lib/` 的环境（开发者目录树运行 `pnpm build` 后）都能正常启动，而 e2e 工作流以 `lib` 模式（`DSH_EXAMPLE_MODE=lib`，构建产物 bin 在普通 Node 下运行）执行无密钥 TUI PTY 冒烟测试，因此 CI 根本不会经过源码启动向量——与此同时，所有干净检出环境中的 `pnpm dsh` 都会在启动时失败，并报错 `plugin(s) failed to load: @deepseek-ai/dsh-tui/prompt`。当时没有门禁检查源码面，因此该故障未被发现便进入发布版本，仅在新的 worktree 中暴露。
+
+## 决策
+
+`scripts/verify-cordis-config.ts`（`validateSourcePlaneResolution`）要求配置中凡是引用本地 workspace 包的模块说明符（包括 harness 包与纳入 vendor 的 Cordis）都必须通过 `tsconfig.base.json` 的 `paths` 外观层（facade）解析到 `.ts`/`.tsx` 源文件；解析以仓库根目录为起点，调用 `ts.resolveModuleName` 完成。解析失败或命中 `.d.ts`（即经 `exports` 回退到构建出的 `lib/types`）都会使 `verify-cordis-config` 失败，并列出配置文件与模块说明符。缺失的 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui/prompt` 映射已添加在其他显式子路径条目旁；删除该映射即可复现门禁失败。
+
+## 备选方案
+
+**依赖无密钥 TUI PTY 冒烟测试。** 在默认源码模式下，该测试通过源码向量启动真实目录树，确实能捕获这个故障，但仅限干净目录树。CI 的 e2e 工作流只以 `lib` 模式运行它（构建产物 bin 通过真实的包 `exports` 解析），因此没有任何 CI 环节执行源码向量，而带有过期 `lib/` 的开发者目录树在本地也仍被掩盖。为 CI 增加一个源码模式冒烟测试，每次也只能证明一种组合；静态门禁则覆盖所有随产品发布的配置与示例配置。
+
+**将 `dsh-source-launch-smoke` 兼容性测试扩展为完整启动。** node-compat 冒烟测试只断言 TTY 拒绝，而该拒绝发生在插件加载之前。每条矩阵版本线都执行一次完整的无密钥启动，会以更高成本重复 PTY 冒烟测试，而且同样只能验证一种组合，无法覆盖所有随产品发布的配置与示例配置。
+
+**使用类似 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-*/prompt` 的通配符映射。** 这能修复当前子路径，却不能杜绝这一类问题；下一个单文件子路径导出（`/surface`、`/message` 等）仍会以同样方式复发。静态门禁覆盖当前及未来配置中引用的所有模块说明符。
+
+## 结果
+
+- 配置中的 workspace 模块说明符若只能通过构建后的 `lib/` 解析，现在会导致 `verify-cordis-config` 门禁失败（在 `hygiene` 和 CI 中执行），而不再成为只在干净目录树中出现的启动崩溃。
+- cordis.yml 中引用新的单文件子路径导出时，必须同步为 `tsconfig.base.json` 添加显式 `paths` 条目；门禁消息会明确提示这一要求。
+- 门禁只使用 `tsconfig.base.json` 的选项执行解析；如果某个模块说明符需要仅客户端可用的编译器选项才能解析，门禁就会失败。这符合该外观层作为 tsx 与 vitest 唯一解析入口的定位。

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-31-coverage-exempt-heavy-suites.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-31-coverage-exempt-heavy-suites.md
+2026-07-31-coverage-exempt-heavy-suites.md: 7235a5193554947ecf71f62d522d09f4e21cb1da
+2026-07-31-coverage-exempt-heavy-suites.zh.md: b739e4494ae8d240b0e35109920a49876ebd222d

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-31-coverage-exempt-heavy-suites.md

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+# Agent Note: Coverage-exempt heavy suites
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-31-coverage-exempt-heavy-suites.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+The CI coverage lane (`check:ci:coverage`) had its wall clock pinned by a handful of heavy test files: in a local 6-worker full-suite profile, 555 test files aggregated 1595 seconds, with `packages/typert/generator/tests/type-model.spec.ts` alone at 885 seconds and the top 10 files holding 84% of the aggregate. These suites share one shape — every case performs whole-workspace compiler analysis or drives real subprocess fixtures — and v8 instrumentation multiplies exactly that kind of runtime.
+
+The decisive waste: the instrumentation tax these suites paid contributed **nothing** to the per-file 100% thresholds — the measured code they execute in-process is either outside the threshold scope already or independently fully covered by other suites. Running them instrumented traded lane time for zero information.
+
+## Decision
+
+The `ci-coverage` aggregate splits into two parallel gates; every test still runs, and only the heavy suites stop paying the instrumentation tax:
+
+- **Instrumented gate** (`test:coverage`): sets `DSH_COVERAGE_EXEMPT_HEAVY=1`, which makes `vitest.config.ts` drop the exempt suites from both projects' excludes; every remaining file runs instrumented and carries the entire threshold proof. The variable is injected through the gate's own env (the existing `Gate.env` mechanism), not the workflow-global environment, so the uninstrumented gate beside it and any local `vitest run` never see it and behave unchanged.
+- **Uninstrumented gate** (`test:coverage-exempt-heavy`): runs exactly the exempt suites through paired positional filters, keeping the correctness signal whole.
+
+`scripts/coverage-exempt.ts` is the single roster point, holding the membership contract and the filter/exclude pairs so the two sides cannot drift.
+
+### The roster, reconciled entry by entry
+
+A suite contributes to coverage exactly when it executes measured files in-process (`coverage.include` spans the package src trees). The current roster, audited:
+
+| Exempt suite | Measured code executed in-process | Who carries the coverage |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| All 6 typert generator specs | The generator's own src | Generator src is threshold-excluded as a package (`vitest.config.ts`) — outside the threshold scope to begin with |
+| tools-catalog.spec additionally imports | `typert-registry` and `tool-cordis` src | Each package's own tests cover them fully (verified with focused coverage runs, zero threshold errors) |
+| `scripts/install-lefthook.spec.ts`, `scripts/oxlint-contract.spec.ts`, `scripts/change-scope.spec.ts` | None — they test `scripts/` sources (never in `coverage.include`) and work by spawning child processes | Nothing to carry |
+
+### Membership contract
+
+A new exemption must satisfy both: every measured file the suite executes in-process is already fully covered by other suites (or threshold-excluded), and the filter and exclude select exactly the same file set. The contract text lives beside the roster in the same file.
+
+### The gate polices the roster automatically
+
+The per-file 100% thresholds are themselves the roster's guard; a wrong roster cannot pass silently:
+
+- If a future exempt suite in fact solely covers some measured file, the instrumented gate goes red on the spot (that file drops below 100%).
+- The converse holds too: new code covered only by an exempt suite turns the gate red immediately.
+
+Coverage-result invariance therefore does not rest on humans maintaining the roster, in line with the misconfiguration-fails-loud convention. The only thing given up is that the exempt suites' own execution no longer produces coverage data — the table above shows that data was entirely redundant, so the final report is file-for-file identical in threshold terms.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+- **CLI `--exclude` to drop the exempt suites from the instrumented gate.** Proven ineffective: vitest 4's `cliExclude` does not participate in per-project include resolution, so under a multi-project config the exempt suites stayed selected; the env + config route replaced it.
+- **Lowering worker counts or raising gate concurrency.** Measured ineffective during the incident: the lane's wall clock was pinned by the longest tail files (aggregate/wall ≈ 4× effective parallelism), and the concurrency knobs moved nothing in either direction.
+- **Cross-runner sharding (`--shard` + blob merge).** Would compress the wall clock further but adds matrix, artifact-pipeline, and merge-job complexity; with the split landed the lane sits near 2 minutes, which does not justify the cost. Revisit if the suite grows substantially.
+- **Deleting or skipping the heavy suites.** Rejected: they are the sole correctness evidence for the typert generator and the scripts tooling; running them uninstrumented in parallel preserves the full signal.
+
+## Verification
+
+Measured on CI (16-core runner): the gate segment went from 424 seconds to the two gates in parallel — `test:coverage` 95.9 s + `test:coverage-exempt-heavy` 71.1 s — with the lane converging on the slower at about 96 seconds; the instrumented gate reported zero threshold errors both before and after the split. `vitest list` verifies the env toggle adds and removes exactly the exempt set; `run-gates.spec.ts` covers the aggregate graph construction.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- The coverage lane's gate segment drops from about 7 minutes to about 96 seconds with no change in threshold outcome or executed test set.
+- `DSH_GATE_CONCURRENCY` has two schedulable gates in this lane again, so the aggregate scheduler is no longer a pass-through.
+- Adding a heavy suite to the roster requires the membership audit above; a wrong entry fails the instrumented gate loudly rather than eroding coverage silently.
+- The exempt suites no longer appear in the coverage report's file list of contributors; their correctness signal lives solely in the uninstrumented gate's pass/fail.

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-31-coverage-exempt-heavy-suites.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+# Agent Note: 覆盖率豁免重型套件
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-31-coverage-exempt-heavy-suites.md) | 中文
+
+## Problem
+
+CI 覆盖率 lane（`check:ci:coverage`）的墙钟被少数几个重型测试文件钉死：本地 6-worker 全量剖析中，555 个测试文件聚合 1595 秒，其中 `packages/typert/generator/tests/type-model.spec.ts` 一个文件占 885 秒，前 10 个文件占聚合时长的 84%。这类套件的共同点是每个用例都做全工作区编译器分析或真实子进程 fixture，v8 插桩把这类代码的运行时间放大数倍。
+
+关键的浪费在于：这些套件缴纳的插桩税对 per-file 100% 阈值**没有任何贡献**——它们进程内执行的被度量代码，要么本来就不在阈值口径内，要么已由其他套件独立满覆盖。继续在插桩下运行它们，纯粹是用 lane 时长换零信息。
+
+## Decision
+
+`ci-coverage` 聚合拆成两个并行 gate，全部测试仍然执行，只有重型套件不再交插桩税：
+
+- **插桩 gate**（`test:coverage`）：设 `DSH_COVERAGE_EXEMPT_HEAVY=1`，`vitest.config.ts` 据此从两个 project 的 exclude 中剔除豁免套件，其余全部文件照旧插桩并承担全部阈值证明。经 gate 自带 env 注入（既有 `Gate.env` 机制），不进 workflow 全局环境，因此并排的无插桩 gate 和本地直跑 `vitest run` 都看不到该变量、行为不变。
+- **无插桩 gate**（`test:coverage-exempt-heavy`）：用配对的 positional filter 恰好运行豁免套件，保证正确性信号不缩水。
+
+`scripts/coverage-exempt.ts` 是唯一名单点，集中持有成员资格契约与 filter/exclude 配对，防止两侧漂移。
+
+### 豁免名单与逐项对账
+
+一个套件对覆盖率有贡献，当且仅当它在进程内执行了被度量的文件（`coverage.include` = 包 src 树）。现行名单逐项核对：
+
+| 豁免套件 | 进程内执行的被度量代码 | 覆盖由谁接住 |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| typert generator 全部 6 个 spec | generator 自身 src | generator src 已整包 threshold-excluded（`vitest.config.ts`），本不在阈值口径内 |
+| 其中 tools-catalog.spec 额外 import | `typert-registry`、`tool-cordis` 的 src | 两包各自的测试独立满覆盖（focused coverage 实测无阈值错误） |
+| `scripts/install-lefthook.spec.ts`、`scripts/oxlint-contract.spec.ts`、`scripts/change-scope.spec.ts` | 无——被测对象是 `scripts/` 源码（从不在 coverage.include），执行方式是 spawn 子进程 | 无需接 |
+
+### 成员资格契约
+
+新增豁免必须同时满足：套件进程内执行的每个被度量文件都已由其他套件满覆盖（或在阈值排除名单内）；filter 与 exclude 选中完全相同的文件集。契约文本随名单同文件维护。
+
+### 门禁自动守卫名单正确性
+
+per-file 100% 阈值本身就是豁免名单的守卫，名单错误无法静默通过：
+
+- 若未来某个豁免套件实际独家覆盖着某个被度量文件，插桩 gate 当场红（该文件跌破 100%）；
+- 反向同理：出现"只有豁免套件才覆盖"的新代码，同样立刻红。
+
+因此覆盖率结果的不变性不依赖人工维护名单，符合"misconfiguration fails loud"约定。唯一失去的是豁免套件自身的执行不再产出覆盖数据——由上表可知这些数据全部冗余，最终报告在阈值意义上逐文件相同。
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+- **CLI `--exclude` 从插桩 gate 剔除豁免套件。** 实证无效：vitest 4 的 `cliExclude` 不参与 per-project include 解析，多 project 配置下豁免套件仍被选中，故改走 env + config。
+- **降低 worker 数或提高 gate 并发。** 事故期间实测无效：lane 墙钟被尾部最长文件钉死（聚合/墙钟 ≈ 4× 有效并行），并发旋钮两个方向都动不了尾巴。
+- **跨 runner 分片（`--shard` + blob 合并）。** 能进一步压墙钟但引入 matrix、artifact 管道与合并 job 的复杂度；拆分落地后 lane 已到约 2 分钟，不值得付。若未来套件规模再涨可重新评估。
+- **直接删除或跳过重型套件。** 拒绝：它们是 typert generator 与 scripts 工具的唯一正确性证据，无插桩并排执行保住全部信号。
+
+## Verification
+
+CI 实测（16 核 runner）：拆分前 gate 段 424 秒，拆分后两 gate 并行 `test:coverage` 95.9 秒 + `test:coverage-exempt-heavy` 71.1 秒，lane 收敛于较慢者约 96 秒；拆分前后插桩 gate 阈值错误均为零。`vitest list` 验证 env 开关两态恰好增删豁免集；`run-gates.spec.ts` 覆盖聚合图构造。
+
+## Consequences
+
+- 覆盖率 lane 的 gate 段从约 7 分钟降到约 96 秒，阈值结果与执行测试集均无变化。
+- `DSH_GATE_CONCURRENCY` 在本 lane 重新拥有两个可调度对象，聚合调度器不再是直通。
+- 向名单新增重型套件必须完成上述成员资格对账；错误条目会让插桩 gate 大声失败，而不是静默侵蚀覆盖率。
+- 豁免套件不再出现在覆盖率报告的贡献文件列表中；其正确性信号完全由无插桩 gate 的红绿承载。

.agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-30-sidebar-resize-without-visible-pill.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-30-sidebar-resize-without-visible-pill.md
+2026-07-30-sidebar-resize-without-visible-pill.md: cc41898990fa23ff2937140186a8324217911d2e
+2026-07-30-sidebar-resize-without-visible-pill.zh.md: 9f1f521df2848b15f5015719bfa6f0e0e9b7be0c

.agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-30-sidebar-resize-without-visible-pill.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# Agent Note: Sidebar resize without a visible pill
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-30-sidebar-resize-without-visible-pill.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+The AppFrame exposed identical floating pills on both column borders. The left pill added unnecessary visual weight beside primary navigation, but the sidebar's resize interaction remains useful.
+
+## Decision
+
+AppFrame keeps the sidebar's 8px resize hit strip, `col-resize` cursor, pointer capture, animation-frame throttling, and width updates, but does not generate the sidebar handle's pill pseudo-element. The details boundary retains both its hit strip and floating pill.
+
+The layout component test continues to pin sidebar dragging and both handles' collapse lifecycle. A keyless browser scenario reads the generated pseudo-elements from the shipped composition and drags the invisible sidebar boundary to prove the interaction remains live.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**Remove the sidebar drag interaction with the pill.** Rejected because the requested change is visual; removing a working geometry control would unnecessarily narrow the interaction.
+
+**Keep the pill but reduce its emphasis.** A smaller or lower-contrast pill still leaves an unwanted object on the sidebar boundary.
+
+## Consequences
+
+The sidebar boundary is visually quiet while pointer resizing remains available from the boundary and retains the resize cursor. Unlike the details control, that interaction has no visible pill.

.agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-30-sidebar-resize-without-visible-pill.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# Agent Note: 侧边栏缩放不显示胶囊
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-30-sidebar-resize-without-visible-pill.md) | 中文
+
+## 问题
+
+AppFrame 在两个栏位边界都显示相同的浮动胶囊。左侧胶囊在主导航旁增加了不必要的视觉负担，但侧边栏的缩放交互仍有用。
+
+## 决策
+
+AppFrame 保留侧边栏宽 8px 的缩放命中条带、`col-resize` 光标、指针捕获、动画帧节流和宽度更新，但不再生成侧边栏手柄的胶囊形伪元素。详情栏边界同时保留命中条带和浮动胶囊。
+
+布局组件测试继续固定侧边栏拖动行为，以及两个手柄随面板折叠时的生命周期。一个无密钥浏览器场景读取实际交付组合所生成的伪元素，并拖动不可见的侧边栏边界，证明该交互仍然有效。
+
+## 曾考虑的替代方案
+
+**随胶囊一并移除侧边栏拖动交互。** 不予采纳，因为本次要求只改视觉表现；移除正常工作的几何控制会不必要地缩减交互方式。
+
+**保留胶囊，但降低其视觉强调。** 更小或对比度更低的胶囊仍会在侧边栏边界留下一个不需要的物体。
+
+## 后果
+
+侧边栏边界在视觉上保持简洁，同时仍可在边界处通过指针调整宽度，并保留缩放光标。与详情栏控件不同，该交互没有可见胶囊。

.agents/notes/implemented/testing/2026-07-24-web-gui-browser-e2e-lane.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/testing/2026-07-24-web-gui-browser-e2e-lane.md
-2026-07-24-web-gui-browser-e2e-lane.md: 898b8b5fe1b8d65b108b4afa95b782a1ce1e5c71
-2026-07-24-web-gui-browser-e2e-lane.zh.md: 966a9854aee8f3b63b2ae8f1362f91a40b9ba894
+2026-07-24-web-gui-browser-e2e-lane.md: 107dbddbfde8ad29e22d9cba04ce2b83c1d01383
+2026-07-24-web-gui-browser-e2e-lane.zh.md: e4132b2ebb3f30a9d540f47cf9416a13bc4aa9f3

.agents/notes/implemented/testing/2026-07-24-web-gui-browser-e2e-lane.md

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ The web GUI ships as a real assembled chain — chromium page → client plugin
 
 A plain shared-fixture module (the [testing-policy sanctioned shape](../../../../docs/testing.md)), not a package: the gate-worthy logic — replay derivation, session parsing, log scrubbing, persistence — lives in the gated packages `dsh-llm-replay`, `dsh-acp-snapshot`, and `dsh-session-persistence-jsonl`; what remains is boot wiring and browser glue, and chromium-driving code cannot hold per-file 100% coverage on the browserless coverage runners.
 
-`launchWebScaffold()` boots the real web composition from the shipped `apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml` plus `apps/cli/config/web.cordis.yml` through the vendored Loader's include mechanism — the same tree and mechanism `AppCLIEntry` drives for `dsh web`. Divergences ride include patches over that tree, the ACP `cordis.snapshot.yml` pattern expressed in-process: temp `persistenceRoot`, `workspace-context` disabled (recorded fixtures must not embed this repo's AGENTS.md), `session-title-llm` disabled (its fire-and-forget title call would race the loop for the session's replay cursor), the webserver row pinned to port 0 with the built dist, and in keyless modes `llm-deepseek` disabled. A patch id that stops matching a row fails the boot sweep loudly instead of drifting. The boot runs `chdir`'d to the temp workspace so the api-gateway's `process.cwd()` session default, tool cwds, and fixtures agree; the `dsh web` bin's own glue (argv, profile json, AppCLIEntry) stays held by the keyless CLI smokes in `smoke-real.e2e.ts`. Setup rollback and ordinary close both dispose the Cordis tree before removing the two owned temp roots, attempt every cleanup independently, and report cleanup failures without masking the setup failure.
+`launchWebScaffold()` boots the real web composition from the shipped `apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml` plus `apps/cli/config/web.cordis.yml` through the vendored Loader's include mechanism — the same tree and mechanism `AppCLIEntry` drives for `dsh web`. Divergences ride include patches over that tree, the ACP `cordis.snapshot.yml` pattern expressed in-process: temp `persistenceRoot`; every host-level `skill-local` root (`dshHome`, `agentsHome`, and `bundledSkillDir`) pinned beneath the temp workspace with watching disabled, because ambient skill catalogs are model-visible input; `workspace-context` disabled (recorded fixtures must not embed this repo's AGENTS.md); `session-title-llm` disabled (its fire-and-forget title call would race the loop for the session's replay cursor); the webserver row pinned to port 0 with the built dist; and in keyless modes `llm-deepseek` disabled. A patch id that stops matching a row fails the boot sweep loudly instead of drifting. The boot runs `chdir`'d to the temp workspace so the api-gateway's `process.cwd()` session default, tool cwds, and fixtures agree; the `dsh web` bin's own glue (argv, profile json, AppCLIEntry) stays held by the keyless CLI smokes in `smoke-real.e2e.ts`. Setup rollback and ordinary close both dispose the Cordis tree before removing the two owned temp roots, attempt every cleanup independently, and report cleanup failures without masking the setup failure.
 
 Keyless model displacement is the disabled adapter row plus `installLlmReplay` filling the open seam on the settled root ctx in providers-catalog mode — never catch-all: with the adapter row disabled no adapter exists, so catch-all would leave `resolveModelInfo` unroutable and `compact-basic`'s post-step pressure check would warn every step instead of being provably inert (the published 128k `contextWindow` keeps it inert for small fixtures). The direct install rather than an inserted replay plugin row is deliberate: it returns the `ReplayHandle` the teardown consumption check needs. A scenario with no fixture leaves the seam empty, so a stray stream fails loud with NO_ADAPTER.
 
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ Surveyed AI-chat/agent web UIs and mocking layers (LibreChat, vercel/ai-chatbot
 
 ## Testing
 
-`pnpm run test:web` builds and runs the lane keylessly; `test:web:built` runs it against existing build artifacts. `DSH_SNAPSHOT=record pnpm exec vitest run --config vitest.web.config.ts apps/web/tests/<spec>` records a prompting scenario against the live model, and `DSH_SNAPSHOT=refresh pnpm run test:web` rewrites aria goldens keylessly. CI explicitly selects replay mode. `dsh-llm-replay` unit coverage pins pacing, cancellation, consumption diagnostics, sidecar validation, indexed replacement, and the single append position.
+`pnpm run test:web` builds and runs the lane keylessly; `test:web:built` runs it against existing build artifacts. `DSH_SNAPSHOT=record pnpm exec vitest run --config vitest.web.config.ts apps/web/tests/<spec>` records a prompting scenario against the live model, and `DSH_SNAPSHOT=refresh pnpm run test:web` rewrites aria goldens keylessly. CI explicitly selects replay mode. The scaffold hermeticity scenario populates distinct entries in all three ambient skill roots and requires none to enter the assembled catalog. `dsh-llm-replay` unit coverage pins pacing, cancellation, consumption diagnostics, sidecar validation, indexed replacement, and the single append position.
 
 ## Deferred
 

.agents/notes/implemented/testing/2026-07-24-web-gui-browser-e2e-lane.zh.md

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Web GUI 以一条真实组装链交付——chromium 页面 → client 插件 bu
 
 一个普通的共享 fixture 模块（[测试政策认可的形态](../../../../docs/testing.md)），不是包：值得门禁把守的逻辑——回放推导、会话解析、日志脱敏、持久化——都在已受门禁的包 `dsh-llm-replay`、`dsh-acp-snapshot`、`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl` 中；剩下的只是启动接线和浏览器胶水，而驱动 chromium 的源码在无浏览器的覆盖率 runner 上无法诚实保持逐文件 100% 覆盖率。
 
-`launchWebScaffold()` 通过 vendored Loader 的 include 机制，从交付的 `apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml` 与 `apps/cli/config/web.cordis.yml` 启动真实 web 组合——与 `AppCLIEntry` 为 `dsh web` 驱动的是同一棵树、同一套机制。差异全部经 include patch 覆盖在这棵树上，即 ACP `cordis.snapshot.yml` 模式的进程内表达：临时 `persistenceRoot`；禁用 `workspace-context`（录制的 fixture 不得嵌入本仓库的 AGENTS.md）；禁用 `session-title-llm`（其发后不管的标题调用会与循环争抢会话的回放游标）；webserver 行钉到端口 0 加已构建 dist；无密钥模式下禁用 `llm-deepseek`。patch 的 id 一旦不再匹配任何行，boot 扫描会大声失败而不是漂移。boot 在临时工作区 `chdir` 下运行，使 api-gateway 的 `process.cwd()` 会话默认值、工具 cwd 与 fixture 一致；`dsh web` bin 自身的胶水（argv、profile json、AppCLIEntry）仍由 `smoke-real.e2e.ts` 中的无密钥 CLI 冒烟把守。初始化回滚和正常关闭都会先对 Cordis 树执行 dispose（资源释放），再删除 scaffold 持有的两个临时根目录；每项清理都会独立尝试，并会报告清理失败而不掩盖初始化失败。
+`launchWebScaffold()` 通过 vendored Loader 的 include 机制，从交付的 `apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml` 与 `apps/cli/config/web.cordis.yml` 启动真实 web 组合——与 `AppCLIEntry` 为 `dsh web` 驱动的是同一棵树、同一套机制。差异全部经 include patch 覆盖在这棵树上，即 ACP `cordis.snapshot.yml` 模式的进程内表达：临时 `persistenceRoot`；每个主机级 `skill-local` 根目录（`dshHome`、`agentsHome` 和 `bundledSkillDir`）都钉在临时工作区下并禁用监听，因为环境 skill（技能）目录是模型可见输入；禁用 `workspace-context`（录制的 fixture 不得嵌入本仓库的 AGENTS.md）；禁用 `session-title-llm`（其发后不管的标题调用会与循环争抢会话的回放游标）；webserver 行钉到端口 0 加已构建 dist；无密钥模式下禁用 `llm-deepseek`。patch 的 id 一旦不再匹配任何行，boot 扫描会大声失败而不是漂移。boot 在临时工作区 `chdir` 下运行，使 api-gateway 的 `process.cwd()` 会话默认值、工具 cwd 与 fixture 一致；`dsh web` bin 自身的胶水（argv、profile json、AppCLIEntry）仍由 `smoke-real.e2e.ts` 中的无密钥 CLI 冒烟把守。初始化回滚和正常关闭都会先对 Cordis 树执行 dispose（资源释放），再删除 scaffold 持有的两个临时根目录；每项清理都会独立尝试，并会报告清理失败而不掩盖初始化失败。
 
 无密钥的模型替换 = 禁用适配器行的 patch 加 `installLlmReplay` 在停稳的根 ctx 上以提供方目录（providers-catalog）模式填充开放的 seam——绝不用 catch-all：适配器行被禁用后不存在任何适配器，catch-all 会让 `resolveModelInfo` 无路由可走，`compact-basic` 的步后压力检查将步步告警，而不是被可证明地闲置（发布的 128k `contextWindow` 使该路径对小 fixture 保持闲置）。选择直接安装而非插入回放插件行是刻意的：直接安装返回收尾消费检查所需的 `ReplayHandle`。没有 fixture 的场景让 seam 保持空置，任何离群的流式调用都会以 NO_ADAPTER 大声失败。
 
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ Web GUI 以一条真实组装链交付——chromium 页面 → client 插件 bu
 
 ## Testing
 
-`pnpm run test:web` 构建并无密钥运行该车道；`test:web:built` 基于现有构建产物运行。`DSH_SNAPSHOT=record pnpm exec vitest run --config vitest.web.config.ts apps/web/tests/<spec>` 对真实模型录制一个发起提示的场景，`DSH_SNAPSHOT=refresh pnpm run test:web` 则无密钥重写 aria 预期输出。CI 显式选择回放模式。`dsh-llm-replay` 单元覆盖率钉住节奏控制、取消、消费诊断、sidecar 校验、按索引替换与唯一的追加位置。
+`pnpm run test:web` 构建并无密钥运行该车道；`test:web:built` 基于现有构建产物运行。`DSH_SNAPSHOT=record pnpm exec vitest run --config vitest.web.config.ts apps/web/tests/<spec>` 对真实模型录制一个发起提示的场景，`DSH_SNAPSHOT=refresh pnpm run test:web` 则无密钥重写 aria 预期输出。CI 显式选择回放模式。scaffold 环境隔离场景会在全部 3 个环境 skill 根目录中分别填入不同条目，并要求这些条目都不得进入组装后的目录。`dsh-llm-replay` 单元覆盖率钉住节奏控制、取消、消费诊断、sidecar 校验、按索引替换与唯一的追加位置。
 
 ## 暂缓
 

.agents/notes/implemented/testing/2026-07-30-vitest-jsdom-webstorage-ownership.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/testing/2026-07-30-vitest-jsdom-webstorage-ownership.md
+2026-07-30-vitest-jsdom-webstorage-ownership.md: 3956a7566fa1c79a767636bce9a19f16588126e2
+2026-07-30-vitest-jsdom-webstorage-ownership.zh.md: 9080ee2762b74bf2efdaccd7a5905672001bc0e8

.agents/notes/implemented/testing/2026-07-30-vitest-jsdom-webstorage-ownership.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+# Agent Note: Keep browser storage owned by jsdom in Vitest
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-30-vitest-jsdom-webstorage-ownership.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+The supported Node range includes releases that reserve a process-wide `globalThis.localStorage`. Node 26 exposes that property as `undefined` without `--localstorage-file`; Vitest sees the reserved key and does not project jsdom's isolated `Storage` object over it. Component suites then fail before exercising product behavior, while the primary Node 24 coverage lane remains green because that runtime does not reserve the key by default.
+
+## Decision
+
+Vitest workers disable Node's process-wide Web Storage when the runtime advertises the `--webstorage` flag. The configuration passes `--no-webstorage` through each test project's `execArgv`; runtimes without that flag receive no argument. Node-environment suites therefore stay browser-free, and files selecting jsdom through `@vitest-environment jsdom` receive jsdom's isolated `localStorage`.
+
+The Node compatibility aggregate runs a dedicated jsdom smoke on every advertised compatibility line. It asserts both the conditional worker argument and usable storage, so a future Node or Vitest change cannot leave the primary Node 24 suite as the only signal.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+- **Set `NODE_OPTIONS=--no-webstorage` in package scripts or CI.** Rejected because it leaks test-runner policy into subprocesses and misses direct `pnpm exec vitest` invocations.
+- **Pass `--localstorage-file` to Node.** Rejected because one process-wide persistent store has different ownership and isolation semantics from browser storage created per jsdom environment.
+- **Patch `globalThis.localStorage` in setup code or guard every component test.** Rejected because setup would depend on Vitest's private jsdom projection details, while per-test guards hide a broken browser environment and duplicate policy across suites.
+- **Pin tests to Node 24.** Rejected because the package engine advertises newer even Node lines and the compatibility matrix exists to expose their runtime changes.
+
+## Consequences
+
+The same `pnpm test` command works on Node releases with and without built-in Web Storage. Test workers deliberately cannot exercise Node's process-wide Web Storage; a future product need for that API requires a separate explicit test configuration rather than weakening jsdom isolation. The compatibility lane adds one focused Vitest process instead of duplicating the complete unit inventory on every Node version.

.agents/notes/implemented/testing/2026-07-30-vitest-jsdom-webstorage-ownership.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+# Agent Note: 在 Vitest 中将浏览器存储交由 jsdom 管理
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-30-vitest-jsdom-webstorage-ownership.md) | 中文
+
+## 问题
+
+受支持的 Node 版本范围包含会预留进程级 `globalThis.localStorage` 的版本。未设置 `--localstorage-file` 时，Node 26 将该属性暴露为 `undefined`；Vitest 检测到这个预留键后，不会用 jsdom 的隔离 `Storage` 对象覆盖该属性。因此，组件测试套件尚未验证产品行为便会失败，而主要的 Node 24 覆盖率分支仍能通过，因为该运行时默认不会预留此键。
+
+## 决策
+
+当运行时声明支持 `--webstorage` 标志时，Vitest worker 会禁用 Node 的进程级 Web Storage。配置通过每个测试项目的 `execArgv` 传入 `--no-webstorage`；未声明该标志的运行时则不传入此参数。因此，Node 环境测试套件不加载浏览器环境，而通过 `@vitest-environment jsdom` 选择 jsdom 的文件会获得 jsdom 隔离的 `localStorage`。
+
+Node 兼容性汇总任务会在每条声明支持的兼容版本线上运行专用的 jsdom 冒烟测试。该测试同时断言 worker 参数按条件传入且存储可用，因此未来 Node 或 Vitest 的变化不会让主要的 Node 24 测试套件成为唯一检测信号。
+
+## 曾考虑的替代方案
+
+- **在包脚本或 CI 中设置 `NODE_OPTIONS=--no-webstorage`。** 否决：这会将测试运行器策略传播到子进程，也无法覆盖直接调用 `pnpm exec vitest` 的情况。
+- **向 Node 传入 `--localstorage-file`。** 否决：单个进程级持久化存储与每个 jsdom 环境分别创建的浏览器存储具有不同的归属和隔离语义。
+- **在初始化代码中修改 `globalThis.localStorage`，或为每个组件测试增加保护逻辑。** 否决：初始化逻辑会依赖 Vitest 私有的 jsdom 映射细节，而逐测试添加的保护逻辑会掩盖浏览器环境损坏，并在多个测试套件中重复该策略。
+- **将测试固定在 Node 24。** 否决：包的引擎范围声明支持更新的偶数 Node 版本线，而兼容性矩阵正是为了暴露这些版本的运行时变化。
+
+## 后果
+
+同一条 `pnpm test` 命令在有无内置 Web Storage 的 Node 版本上均可运行。测试 worker 被有意禁止使用 Node 的进程级 Web Storage；未来若产品需要该 API，必须使用独立且显式的测试配置，而不能削弱 jsdom 隔离。兼容性分支只增加一个专项 Vitest 进程，无需在每个 Node 版本上重复整套单元测试。

.agents/notes/proposed/architecture/2026-07-25-client-settings-locale-theme.i18n.yaml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
-#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
-2026-07-25-client-settings-locale-theme.md: 87077b3fd3f0bd8a3375a71aebf947cbd9961799
-2026-07-25-client-settings-locale-theme.zh.md: a64a4afdf6565a527a25136694aa79305eeabb3c
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/proposed/architecture/2026-07-25-client-settings-locale-theme.md
+2026-07-25-client-settings-locale-theme.md: c86d6ac053f7bb87ce758613a5f3a0a34951e428
+2026-07-25-client-settings-locale-theme.zh.md: 05edbb3c550828832a390e3cf4fad3262b5be196

.agents/notes/proposed/architecture/2026-07-25-client-settings-locale-theme.md

@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ root
             └─ models (order 10)         ui-models 注册
 ```
 
-Section and item contributions both use declaration-aware deferral (ui-slots' `deferRegistration()`: ledger-judged presence, `refresh()` for localized labels, one-call disposal) and do not depend on the client manifest's apply order. The SlotMap types split homes: trigger/header/close/section have their canonical home in the ui-settings contract (the consumers, general and models, both depend on the shell — no cycle); `settings.general.item`'s canonical home is the locale package — it is the lowest common dependency of all item registrants (a settings row always carries copy), while the declarer general's contract is unreachable from locale/ui-theme (it would form a cycle); ui-theme consumes it through a re-export seam.
+Section and item contributions both use declaration-aware deferral (ui-slots' `deferRegistration()`: ledger-judged presence, one-call disposal; localized labels ride the label thunk from the [full-rollout note](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-client-locale-full-rollout.md), not `refresh()`) and do not depend on the client manifest's apply order. The SlotMap types split homes: trigger/header/close/section have their canonical home in the ui-settings contract (the consumers, general and models, both depend on the shell — no cycle); `settings.general.item`'s canonical home is the locale package — it is the lowest common dependency of all item registrants (a settings row always carries copy), while the declarer general's contract is unreachable from locale/ui-theme (it would form a cycle); ui-theme consumes it through a re-export seam.
 
 ### Future work: promote slot declarations to first-class injectable waits
 

.agents/notes/proposed/architecture/2026-07-25-client-settings-locale-theme.zh.md

@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ root
             └─ models (order 10)         ui-models 注册
 ```
 
-section/item contribution 均使用 declaration-aware deferral（ui-slots 的 `deferRegistration()`：ledger 判在位、`refresh()` 换本地化 label、一键 dispose），不依赖 client manifest 的 apply 顺序。SlotMap 类型分家：trigger/header/close/section 正家在 ui-settings contract（消费者 general/models 均依赖壳，无环）；`settings.general.item` 正家在 locale 包——它是全部 item 注册方的最低公共依赖（设置行必带文案），而声明方 general 的 contract 对 locale/ui-theme 不可达（会成环）；ui-theme 经 re-export seam 消费。
+section/item contribution 均使用 declaration-aware deferral（ui-slots 的 `deferRegistration()`：ledger 判在位、一键 dispose；本地化 label 走 [全量接入 Note](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-client-locale-full-rollout.md) 的 label thunk，不再 `refresh()`），不依赖 client manifest 的 apply 顺序。SlotMap 类型分家：trigger/header/close/section 正家在 ui-settings contract（消费者 general/models 均依赖壳，无环）；`settings.general.item` 正家在 locale 包——它是全部 item 注册方的最低公共依赖（设置行必带文案），而声明方 general 的 contract 对 locale/ui-theme 不可达（会成环）；ui-theme 经 re-export seam 消费。
 
 ### Future work：坑位声明升格为可 inject 的一等等待物
 

.github/workflows/build-exe-for-python-sdk.yml

@@ -28,6 +28,11 @@ concurrency:
 permissions:
   contents: read
 
+env:
+  # CI runs must never report to the production telemetry endpoint baked
+  # into apps/cli/cordis.yml (AppCLIEntry disables the row when set).
+  DSH_TELEMETRY_DISABLED: '1'
+
 jobs:
   # Job-level conditions cannot inspect `matrix`, so validate target names and
   # construct the matrix before the dependent jobs.