docs(notes): retire the parallel-native-dispatch TODO claims in the Code Mode note

The rewritten scheduler paragraph states that the native loop already
classifies through isConcurrencySafe, which contradicted two surviving
present-tense claims that parallel native dispatch is an open TODO
blocked on that same metadata. Both now attribute the TODO to decision
time and point at the shipped rolling pool.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-15-code-mode.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-15-code-mode.md
-2026-06-15-code-mode.md: 4aa735fbe18a160fa69b9130fa8cb843f7be5723
-2026-06-15-code-mode.zh.md: 642e8d5d24390fb14b050e2d255cc3f7112413c8
+2026-06-15-code-mode.md: d06e4f470e8155cf51b2127fe9b847f56ea2ff51
+2026-06-15-code-mode.zh.md: a29000c18553e44842d20ebbec191a3e2fd3b9cc

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-15-code-mode.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-06-15-code-mode.zh.md)
 
 ## Problem
 
-In the registry's native presentation, the agent loop advertises every visible capability as a JSON-schema function definition. `ToolRegistry` contributes its schemas to the system-prompt assembly, the assembly's `tools` land on the wire (and in the logged request header), the model invokes one `tool-call` block per step, and the loop dispatches each call through `ctx.tools.execute()` **sequentially** (parallel tool execution is an explicit open TODO in `dsh-tools` and [docs/architecture.md](../../../../docs/architecture.md)), with **every** intermediate `tool-result` re-entering the model's context on the next request.
+In the registry's native presentation, the agent loop advertises every visible capability as a JSON-schema function definition. `ToolRegistry` contributes its schemas to the system-prompt assembly, the assembly's `tools` land on the wire (and in the logged request header), the model invokes one `tool-call` block per step, and the loop dispatches each call through `ctx.tools.execute()` **sequentially** — parallel tool execution was an open TODO at the time of this note, and bounded parallel dispatch has since shipped (the [parallel tool-call note](2026-07-10-parallel-tool-call-execution.md); the rolling pool in [docs/architecture.md](../../../../docs/architecture.md)) — with **every** intermediate `tool-result` re-entering the model's context on the next request.
 
 For multi-step tool work this is token-heavy and serial. The model cannot compose tools — loop over a result set, branch on an intermediate value, fan out, post-process — without a full model round-trip per call, and each round-trip drags the entire intermediate result back into context whether the model needs it or not.
 
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ Deployments switching to `'code'` must update any native-only `toolOrder`. Assem
 
 **Result elision / summarization over native tool-calling.** Addresses only the context-bloat half of the problem: trimming old `tool-result`s is cheap to add as a logged surface replacement under reconstructable requests, but still pays one model round-trip per call and cannot express loops, branches, or joins. Complementary, not competing; it can layer under Code Mode for residual native calls.
 
-**Parallel native dispatch in the loop.** The other answer to round-trip cost; still valid future work (the open TODO), still blocked on concurrency-safety metadata, and still no composition — it parallelizes calls the model already decided on in one step. Code Mode's serialized-queue decision keeps the two compatible: when the metadata lands, both native parallel dispatch and per-tool binding parallelism unlock together.
+**Parallel native dispatch in the loop.** The other answer to round-trip cost at decision time; it was blocked on concurrency-safety metadata and offers no composition either way — it parallelizes calls the model already decided on in one step. Code Mode's queue decision kept the two compatible, and that is how it played out: the metadata landed as `isConcurrencySafe` (the [parallel tool-call note](2026-07-10-parallel-tool-call-execution.md)), and native rolling-pool dispatch and per-tool binding parallelism unlocked on the same classifier.
 
 **Always-exclusive (Cloudflare-faithful, no mode).** Rejected for this SDK's primary consumer: a coding agent's bread-and-butter single calls (`bash`, `read`, `edit`) are already ideal as native calls, and forcing every edit through a program taxes the common case. The mode config keeps the faithful form (`'code'`) one line away without imposing it.
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-15-code-mode.zh.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 问题
 
-在注册表的原生呈现方式下，agent loop（智能体循环）将每个可见能力以 JSON Schema 函数定义的形式通告给模型。`ToolRegistry` 将其 schema 贡献给系统提示词组装，组装结果中的 `tools` 落到协议格式（wire format）上（也记录在请求头日志中），模型每步调用一个 `tool-call` 块，循环通过 `ctx.tools.execute()` **逐个**分发每次调用（并行工具执行是 `dsh-tools` 和 [docs/architecture.md](../../../../docs/architecture.md) 中明确标注的 open TODO），且**每一个**中间 `tool-result` 都会在下一次请求时重新进入模型上下文。
+在注册表的原生呈现方式下，agent loop（智能体循环）将每个可见能力以 JSON Schema 函数定义的形式通告给模型。`ToolRegistry` 将其 schema 贡献给系统提示词组装，组装结果中的 `tools` 落到协议格式（wire format）上（也记录在请求头日志中），模型每步调用一个 `tool-call` 块，循环通过 `ctx.tools.execute()` **逐个**分发每次调用——并行工具执行在本 note 写作时还是 open TODO，此后有界的并行分发已经交付（见[并行工具调用 note](2026-07-10-parallel-tool-call-execution.md)，以及 [docs/architecture.md](../../../../docs/architecture.md) 中的 rolling pool）——且**每一个**中间 `tool-result` 都会在下一次请求时重新进入模型上下文。
 
 对于多步工具操作，这种方式 token 开销大且串行。模型无法组合工具——遍历结果集、根据中间值分支、扇出、后处理——每次调用都需要一次完整的模型往返，而每次往返都会把完整的中间结果拖回上下文，不管模型是否需要。
 
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ SDK 指示模型编写一个所加载运行时语言的异步函数体（默认
 
 **在原生工具调用上做结果省略/摘要。** 仅解决问题中上下文膨胀这一半：裁剪旧 `tool-result` 作为可重建请求下的日志化表面替换成本低，但仍需每次调用一次模型往返，且无法表达循环、分支或汇合。互补而非竞争；它可以在 Code Mode 下为残余的原生调用分层。
 
-**循环中的并行原生分发。** 往返成本的另一个答案；仍是有效的未来工作（open TODO），仍被并发安全元数据阻塞，且仍无组合能力——它并行化的是模型在一步中已经决定的调用。Code Mode 的序列化队列决策保持两者兼容：当元数据就绪时，原生并行分发和每工具绑定并行化一起解锁。
+**循环中的并行原生分发。** 决策当时对往返成本的另一个答案；它被并发安全元数据阻塞，且无论如何都不提供组合能力——它并行化的是模型在一步中已经决定的调用。Code Mode 的队列决策保持了两者兼容，后续也正是这样落地的：元数据以 `isConcurrencySafe` 的形式就绪（见[并行工具调用 note](2026-07-10-parallel-tool-call-execution.md)），原生 rolling-pool 分发与每工具绑定并行化基于同一个分类器一起解锁。
 
 **始终排他（忠于 Cloudflare，无模式）。** 否决，因为本 SDK 的主要消费方是编码 agent：其日常的单次调用（`bash`、`read`、`edit`）作为原生调用已经是最优的，强制每次编辑都通过程序会给常见场景增加负担。mode 配置让忠实形式（`'code'`）只需一行配置即可启用，而不强加于人。