|
|
-A delegated child that asked for approval had no one to ask. Under an interactive parent (`'ask'`), a background child's escalation became a pending question no product surface showed — subagent sessions are omitted from the Web sidebar, the parent's `list_agents` reports plain `running`/`idle`, and the catalog rows show only activity — so a permission-blocked child was indistinguishable from a working one; headless and unanswered compositions failed the same ask closed as `'unavailable'`. The rejection audit landed only in the child's own log, and no tool parameter or Web control can adjust a running child session's sandbox mode or approval policy ([deepseek-harness#1723](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/issues/1723)). The mechanism-heavy fix — a durable blocked-state projection, parent notices, catalog badges, and a permission write path through the subagent ownership fence — was disproportionate directly before release.
|
|
|
+A delegated child that asked for approval had no one to ask. Under an interactive parent (`'ask'`), a background child's escalation became a pending question no product surface showed — subagent sessions are omitted from the Web sidebar, the parent's `list_agents` reports plain `running`/`idle`, and the catalog rows show only activity — so a permission-blocked child was indistinguishable from a working one; headless and unanswered compositions failed the same ask closed as `'unavailable'`. The rejection audit landed only in the child's own log, and no tool parameter or Web control can adjust a running child session's sandbox mode or approval policy (Issue #1723). The mechanism-heavy fix — a durable blocked-state projection, parent notices, catalog badges, and a permission write path through the subagent ownership fence — was disproportionate directly before release.
|