Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into worktree/web-theme-settings-integration-fde706

# Conflicts:
#	.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-client-locale-full-rollout.i18n.yaml
#	.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-client-locale-full-rollout.zh.md
#	.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-web-queue-steer-action.i18n.yaml
#	.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-web-queue-steer-action.zh.md
#	.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-browser-derived-initial-locale.i18n.yaml
#	.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-browser-derived-initial-locale.zh.md
#	.agents/notes/implemented/testing/2026-07-24-web-gui-browser-e2e-lane.i18n.yaml
#	apps/web/tests/scaffold.ts
#	docs/module-graph.md
#	packages/client/runtime/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/client/runtime/package.json
#	packages/client/test-runtime/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/client/test-runtime/README.zh.md
#	packages/client/ui-conversation/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/client/ui-conversation/README.zh.md
#	packages/client/ui-conversation/package.json
#	packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/apply.ts
#	packages/client/ui-theme/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/client/ui-theme/README.md
#	packages/client/ui-theme/README.zh.md
#	packages/host/apiproxy/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/host/apiproxy/README.zh.md
#	pnpm-lock.yaml

.agents/notes/README.i18n.yaml

@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/README.md
 README.md: 3cfbb5154713046846a3bfcb2ccea62c0e4cb6c0
-README.zh.md: 61887320e9e54b35154c79e33e9a9525aceeef50
+README.zh.md: 4b3a1ee57ea61a8e8ba4d01cf7c719bbf8440e30

.agents/notes/README.zh.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 [English](README.md) | 中文
 
-这里存放一类设计文档。**Agent Note** 记录塑造本代码库的决策或提案：代码和文档无法承载的*为什么*以及*放弃了什么*。本文件是入口和契约：Agent Note 存放在哪里、何时需要写一份，以及[文件内格式](#the-file-format)。
+这里存放一类设计文档。**Agent Note** 记录塑造本代码库的决策或提案：代码和文档无法承载的*为什么*以及*放弃了什么*。本文件是入口和约定：Agent Note 存放在哪里、何时需要写一份，以及[文件内格式](#the-file-format)。
 
 ## 布局与命名
 
@@ -45,13 +45,13 @@
 
 ## 何时需要写一份
 
-每个非平凡变更都必须在同一 PR（Pull Request）中新增或更新至少一份 Agent Note。如果变更修改了行为、架构、跨文件或跨包契约、流程或工具、测试策略、磁盘存储格式、协议格式（wire format）或配置格式，或者其他维护者可能合理重新审视的决策，就属于非平凡变更。对未来重大工作的提案从 `proposed/` 开始；已经做出的决策从 `implemented/` 开始。选择与决策匹配的类别文件夹（见[分类](#classification)）。
+每个非平凡变更都必须在同一 PR（Pull Request）中新增或更新至少一份 Agent Note。如果变更修改了行为、架构、跨文件或跨包约定、流程或工具、测试策略、磁盘存储格式、协议格式（wire format）或配置格式，或者其他维护者可能合理重新审视的决策，就属于非平凡变更。对未来重大工作的提案从 `proposed/` 开始；已经做出的决策从 `implemented/` 开始。选择与决策匹配的类别文件夹（见[分类](#classification)）。
 
-更新已经拥有该决策的 Agent Note 即可满足规则；不要创建重复记录。只有不涉及行为、契约、结构、流程或理由变化的纯机械性或局部编辑才可豁免。Agent Note 永远不会被编辑为一个*不同的决策*：用新 Agent Note 取代旧记录，并让两个记录保持互相链接，除非后续依据下方规则完全合并旧记录。编辑 `implemented/` Agent Note 以跟踪其现有决策的所在位置是必需的，而非禁止的；见 [implemented/AGENTS.md](implemented/AGENTS.md)。
+更新已经拥有该决策的 Agent Note 即可满足规则；不要创建重复记录。只有不涉及行为、约定、结构、流程或理由变化的纯机械性或局部编辑才可豁免。Agent Note 永远不会被编辑为一个*不同的决策*：用新 Agent Note 取代旧记录，并让两个记录保持互相链接，除非后续依据下方规则完全合并旧记录。编辑 `implemented/` Agent Note 以跟踪其现有决策的所在位置是必需的，而非禁止的；见 [implemented/AGENTS.md](implemented/AGENTS.md)。
 
-被完全取代的 implemented Agent Note 可以合并到当前持有该决策的记录中，并删除原文件。删除前，当前记录必须保存所有独有的决策依据、备选方案、影响、验证契约和明确指出的覆盖缺口；修复所有入站链接；并在同一变更中删除中文对侧文件和一致性记录。仅部分被取代的记录不符合此条件：保留两个记录并让它们互相链接，同时更新所有仍然适用的事实。合并不得将旧文件改写成与其相反的决策，也不得让 git 历史成为决策依据的唯一副本。
+被完全取代的 implemented Agent Note 可以合并到当前持有该决策的记录中，并删除原文件。删除前，当前记录必须保存所有独有的决策依据、备选方案、影响、验证约定和明确指出的覆盖缺口；修复所有入站链接；并在同一变更中删除中文对侧文件和一致性记录。仅部分被取代的记录不符合此条件：保留两个记录并让它们互相链接，同时更新所有仍然适用的事实。合并不得将旧文件改写成与其相反的决策，也不得让 git 历史成为决策依据的唯一副本。
 
-只有当一项功能已从生产代码、配置、schema、持久化格式或协议格式、迁移和兼容行为中完全消失，当前文档不再将其描述为可用，且没有测试把它作为受支持行为来执行时，新增该功能的 Agent Note 才可合并进后续的移除记录。移除决策的依据和验证该功能已不存在的测试可以保留。移除决策的持有记录必须保留最初动机、为什么该动机已不足以证明保留该功能的合理性、完全移除之外的备选方案、放弃的能力、重新引入的条件，以及证明已彻底移除的验证。过时的实现清单和只验证已删除行为的测试不属于当前验证契约。仅移除一种传输、默认值、实现或展示属于部分取代；仍有任何持久数据或兼容处理也同样如此。
+只有当一项功能已从生产代码、配置、schema、持久化格式或协议格式、迁移和兼容行为中完全消失，当前文档不再将其描述为可用，且没有测试把它作为受支持行为来执行时，新增该功能的 Agent Note 才可合并进后续的移除记录。移除决策的依据和验证该功能已不存在的测试可以保留。移除决策的持有记录必须保留最初动机、为什么该动机已不足以证明保留该功能的合理性、完全移除之外的备选方案、放弃的能力、重新引入的条件，以及证明已彻底移除的验证。过时的实现清单和只验证已删除行为的测试不属于当前验证约定。仅移除一种传输、默认值、实现或展示属于部分取代；仍有任何持久数据或兼容处理也同样如此。
 
 <a id="the-file-format"></a>
 
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Status: <status>
 
 ### 正文骨架
 
-每份 Agent Note 的正文以 `## Problem` 开头：动机，写法上不依赖解决方案即可独立成文。后续内容取决于生命周期；固定章节使用以下规范名称且仅限这些名称，而真正独特的技术章节（包拓扑、协议契约、schema 等）在必需章节之间可自由组织。
+每份 Agent Note 的正文以 `## Problem` 开头：动机，写法上不依赖解决方案即可独立成文。后续内容取决于生命周期；固定章节使用以下规范名称且仅限这些名称，而真正独特的技术章节（包拓扑、协议约定、schema 等）在必需章节之间可自由组织。
 
 #### `proposed/`
 
@@ -126,4 +126,4 @@ Status: <status>
 
 ### 中文对侧文件
 
-`.zh.md` 对侧文件按 [i18n 契约](../../docs/i18n/README.md)逐章节镜像其英文对侧文件的结构；机器检查的头部标记（`# Agent Note: ` 和 `Status:` 行）保持英文原样不翻译。格式门禁跳过 `.zh.md` 文件——配对门禁负责它们的一致性。
+`.zh.md` 对侧文件按 [i18n 约定](../../docs/i18n/README.md)逐章节镜像其英文对侧文件的结构；机器检查的头部标记（`# Agent Note: ` 和 `Status:` 行）保持英文原样不翻译。格式门禁跳过 `.zh.md` 文件——配对门禁负责它们的一致性。

.agents/notes/archived/manifest.json

@@ -298,6 +298,9 @@
     "process/2026-07-26-gui-pr-gif-evidence-and-assets-branch.i18n.yaml": "sha256:89b6dc255cb0dd9d97ae6f34f37d185412d4260d7bf2f87d6b25e340f01dc26e",
     "process/2026-07-26-gui-pr-gif-evidence-and-assets-branch.md": "sha256:1742e09435ade4a09349c8843eb381e870a2be2d51b74449f08260422c8096b3",
     "process/2026-07-26-gui-pr-gif-evidence-and-assets-branch.zh.md": "sha256:220bd53a88617b09ee8970627c46540fa8951724b102acfe296a7ed7d0f7b5fe",
+    "process/2026-07-27-wine-windows-gates-experiment.i18n.yaml": "sha256:6f4cbc12ee9cddbb297bf7e138ccabcd204f66898a0f7411b1633f03d5a9eab5",
+    "process/2026-07-27-wine-windows-gates-experiment.md": "sha256:8d37dcdab058098c7de3da1de00ce61bef92bbc8d6ee71add959474c6fb3e936",
+    "process/2026-07-27-wine-windows-gates-experiment.zh.md": "sha256:77fbf04df36af09e55007a93bd6b22d08ff99869efe8de3e97dac5b4701e0a9e",
     "simplification/2026-06-20-drop-unconsumed-llm-adapter-change-event.i18n.yaml": "sha256:ad3d1263cb0051b885173bf064de62065e2c646ccaae2d7250723da3b4eab90c",
     "simplification/2026-06-20-drop-unconsumed-llm-adapter-change-event.md": "sha256:8fb061d51c8c23b47d2367814bab3623c6d5b972f38d207a273caa9030b579bd",
     "simplification/2026-06-20-drop-unconsumed-llm-adapter-change-event.zh.md": "sha256:2ffeaca91f82844a5616d6dcce6b4af514bb8a7c46f78e47f668b204ac6edc04",

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-27-wine-windows-gates-experiment.i18n.yaml → .agents/notes/archived/process/2026-07-27-wine-windows-gates-experiment.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-27-wine-windows-gates-experiment.md
-2026-07-27-wine-windows-gates-experiment.md: 1b01fe00dc1588482442a3cedc35eefa7fdb0975
-2026-07-27-wine-windows-gates-experiment.zh.md: b50739f5b63c5836248c94927037e38900abc84f
+2026-07-27-wine-windows-gates-experiment.md: ce2ad1ad4506f59083de5731677d052161849e3d
+2026-07-27-wine-windows-gates-experiment.zh.md: a0a5e8e7cce078adf2c961fe4d8cc50edc28355c

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-27-wine-windows-gates-experiment.md → .agents/notes/archived/process/2026-07-27-wine-windows-gates-experiment.md

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 # Agent Note: Wine-run Windows blocking gates on Linux runners
 
 Status: implemented
+Archived: 2026-08-08
 
 English | [中文](2026-07-27-wine-windows-gates-experiment.zh.md)
 

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-27-wine-windows-gates-experiment.zh.md → .agents/notes/archived/process/2026-07-27-wine-windows-gates-experiment.zh.md

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 # Agent Note: 在 Linux runner 上用 Wine 运行 Windows 阻断门禁
 
 Status: implemented
+Archived: 2026-08-08
 
 [English](2026-07-27-wine-windows-gates-experiment.md) | 中文
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-content-block-vocabulary.i18n.yaml

@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-content-block-vocabulary.md
 2026-06-11-content-block-vocabulary.md: 5228724bb9101307db9929aaf7831b477c2a6022
-2026-06-11-content-block-vocabulary.zh.md: ffcbbc13dfe9176941f4838b0078d3850403a16c
+2026-06-11-content-block-vocabulary.zh.md: b43de335917c6b5304a94b296fcb8253827b0600

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-content-block-vocabulary.zh.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ harness 需要一套统一的内部消息语言，供 agent loop（智能体循
 
 自主拥有词汇：消息是类型化内容块的数组（`text`、`reasoning`、`tool-call`、`tool-result`），其联合类型派生自可合并扩展的 `ContentBlockMap`，插件通过声明合并添加新的块类型。同一可合并扩展映射模式为所有「字符串化」字段提供类型（`MessageSource`、`FinishReason`、`TurnTrigger`、`TurnEndReason`）。流式输出采用原始分片协议；`BlockAssembler` 是唯一的共享组装实现。适配器负责转换为提供方的协议格式（wire format）——映射成本留在适配器中，正是它该在的地方。
 
-会话内上下文注入（`context/message`）和轮次中途 steering 最初渲染为带标签的 user-role 信封（system-reminder 模式），而非引入新角色，因此适配器无需承担额外负担。如今两者都投影为无包装的普通用户内容；见[注入内容信封 Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-20-unwrap-injected-content-envelopes.md)。实际适配器验证已确认此渲染方式符合当前 DeepSeek 的行为；如果未来某提供方出现不兼容，应在该适配器内处理，而非引入新的规范角色。
+会话内上下文注入（`context/message`）和轮次中途 steering（中途引导）最初渲染为带标签的 user-role 信封（system-reminder 模式），而非引入新角色，因此适配器无需承担额外负担。如今两者都投影为无包装的普通用户内容；见[注入内容信封 Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-20-unwrap-injected-content-envelopes.md)。实际适配器验证已确认此渲染方式符合当前 DeepSeek 的行为；如果未来某提供方出现不兼容，应在该适配器内处理，而非引入新的规范角色。
 
 ## 曾考虑的替代方案
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-dev-invariants-over-deep-readonly.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-dev-invariants-over-deep-readonly.md
-2026-06-11-dev-invariants-over-deep-readonly.md: f1a741927cf63b43b1aaf558efc148ff80d2d881
-2026-06-11-dev-invariants-over-deep-readonly.zh.md: 9aadde4f4452a53acce8a3bcf58560ee9722ecfb
+2026-06-11-dev-invariants-over-deep-readonly.md: 66980f1ee09c6112f72786d6c3a147aadbc57f6c
+2026-06-11-dev-invariants-over-deep-readonly.zh.md: 38a19ee7dd63823b5a5e103908410786c20435c6

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-dev-invariants-over-deep-readonly.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-06-11-dev-invariants-over-deep-readonly.zh.md)
 
 ## Problem
 
-The session log needs two different protections: immutable ownership of each stored fact, and checks for relationships among facts across time and service seams. Conflating them in an optional development plugin would leave production history vulnerable; trying to express both through TypeScript readonly types would not create a runtime boundary or describe relational rules.
+The session log needs two different protections: immutable ownership of each stored fact, and checks for relationships among facts across time and service contracts. Conflating them in an optional development plugin would leave production history vulnerable; trying to express both through TypeScript readonly types would not create a runtime boundary or describe relational rules.
 
 The session log is the durable source of truth for replay, request reconstruction, persistence, and user-visible history. Code outside the session package must be able to inspect that history without retaining a reference that can rewrite it later, and inputs accepted from callers must not remain connected to caller-owned mutable objects.
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-dev-invariants-over-deep-readonly.zh.md

@@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 问题
 
-会话日志需要两种不同的保护：对每条已存储事实的不可变所有权，以及对跨时间和服务 seam 的事实之间关系的检查。如果将二者混为一个可选的开发插件，生产环境的历史记录将失去保护；如果试图通过 TypeScript readonly 类型同时表达两者，既无法建立运行时边界，也无法描述关系规则。
+会话日志需要两种不同的保护：对每条已存储事实的不可变所有权，以及对跨时间和服务约定的事实之间关系的检查。如果将二者混为一个可选的开发插件，生产环境的历史记录将失去保护；如果试图通过 TypeScript readonly 类型同时表达两者，既无法建立运行时边界，也无法描述关系规则。
 
 会话日志是回放、请求重建、持久化与用户可见历史的持久真源。会话包外部的代码必须能检视历史，但不能保留一个可在之后改写历史的引用；从调用方接受的输入也不能继续连接到调用方拥有的可变对象。
 
-单个值的不可变性只是契约的一半。一份日志可以包含完全不可变的记录，但其序列、轮次/步骤嵌套、工具调用配对、作用域分发或重建的模型请求是错误的。这些规则涉及多条记录或多个服务，无法通过冻结单个对象来建立。
+单个值的不可变性只是约定的一半。一份日志可以包含完全不可变的记录，但其序列、轮次/步骤嵌套、工具调用配对、作用域分发或重建的模型请求是错误的。这些规则涉及多条记录或多个服务，无法通过冻结单个对象来建立。
 
 TypeScript readonly 类型不是充分的运行时边界。它们在程序运行时消失，类型转换可以绕过它们，而递归的 `DeepReadonly<T>` 会扩散到每个日志和消息消费方，尽管某些下游请求处理 API 有意使用可变值。
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-event-sourced-sessions.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-event-sourced-sessions.md
-2026-06-11-event-sourced-sessions.md: 01f9628c1cfc000aca8654caf5edeff09411fdcc
-2026-06-11-event-sourced-sessions.zh.md: ec5c3e766dfa97c5612827023c5cc66bf01a8e6c
+2026-06-11-event-sourced-sessions.md: 1303ee843cd5f9e02eae7a1f9bc51594be4bb407
+2026-06-11-event-sourced-sessions.zh.md: d1800ab3820ba5fc60723d6851fe71eded38134f

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-event-sourced-sessions.md

@@ -25,4 +25,4 @@ Ordering contract: the loop claims inbox messages before `agent/pre-step`, opens
 - Replay, trace, and telemetry are structurally guaranteed, not bolted on.
 - Persistence stays a plugin concern; the in-memory store ships in dsh-session.
 - The event vocabulary is merge-extensible (plugins add e.g. compaction events); [session persistence](2026-06-14-session-persistence.md) froze its shape once the log became durable.
-- Derivation cost grows with log length — compaction (future plugin) is the intended mitigation, not log mutation.
+- Derivation cost grows with log length — compaction (dsh-compact) is the intended mitigation, not log mutation.

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-event-sourced-sessions.zh.md

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ MVP 要求严格的基于事件的追踪，以及完全可回放的会话（严
 
 追加操作是同步的（热路径从不阻塞于 I/O）；`session/event` 是同步通知；持久化插件在后台缓冲写入，并在每个轮次结束时触发的 `session/flush` 检查点处等待排空。
 
-顺序契约：agent loop（智能体循环）先领取 inbox 消息，再运行 `agent/pre-step`；只有 enter 决策才打开 `step/start`，随后在请求派生前追加返回的 `user/message` 批次。提供方输出组装并以 `assistant/message` 追加后才分派工具，因此持久日志记录工具实际遵循的确切消息。回归测试固定了这一顺序。
+顺序约定：agent loop（智能体循环）先领取 inbox 消息，再运行 `agent/pre-step`；只有 enter 决策才打开 `step/start`，随后在请求派生前追加返回的 `user/message` 批次。提供方输出组装并以 `assistant/message` 追加后才分派工具，因此持久日志记录工具实际遵循的确切消息。回归测试固定了这一顺序。
 
 ## 曾考虑的替代方案
 
@@ -25,4 +25,4 @@ MVP 要求严格的基于事件的追踪，以及完全可回放的会话（严
 - 回放、追踪与遥测在结构上得到保证，而非事后附加。
 - 持久化仍是插件关注点；内存存储随 dsh-session 一起提供。
 - 事件词汇可通过合并扩展（插件可添加如压缩（compaction）事件）；[会话持久化](2026-06-14-session-persistence.md)在日志具备持久性后固定了其结构。
-- 派生成本随日志长度增长，压缩（未来插件）是预期的缓解手段，而非日志变更。
+- 派生成本随日志长度增长，压缩（dsh-compact）是预期的缓解手段，而非日志变更。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-microkernel-event-taxonomy.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-microkernel-event-taxonomy.md
-2026-06-11-microkernel-event-taxonomy.md: 202595fed125966a5d77920536e7f4ee88f875fe
-2026-06-11-microkernel-event-taxonomy.zh.md: 899c96d86cb7e37d90df349ce5f3f932e0a72f95
+2026-06-11-microkernel-event-taxonomy.md: 6cacbc30f29c863de0f8ddfa4df7251a64bc80ca
+2026-06-11-microkernel-event-taxonomy.zh.md: 40edfa1ada0c11395e8ff29e0abfcb0c38de096a

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-microkernel-event-taxonomy.md

@@ -10,14 +10,14 @@ The product principle is "everything is a plugin": hooks, /goal, /loop, dynamic
 
 ## Decision
 
-Pure Cordis event taxonomy. The loop's extension seams are typed events with deliberate dispatch modes:
+Pure Cordis event taxonomy. The loop's extension points are typed events with deliberate dispatch modes:
 
-- **waterfall** (around-middleware) where plugins transform, veto, recover, or wrap: `agent/pre-step`, `agent/request`, `agent/request-error`, `tools/pre-execute`, `tools/execute`, `tools/post-execute`, `llm/stream`, `system-prompt/assemble`.
+- **waterfall** (around-middleware) where plugins transform, short-circuit, recover, or wrap: `agent/pre-step`, `agent/request`, `agent/request-error`, `tools/pre-execute`, `tools/execute`, `tools/post-execute`, `llm/stream`, `system-prompt/assemble`.
 - **serial** (awaited in listener order) for ordered checkpoints such as `agent/turn-stopping`.
 - **parallel** (awaited fan-out) where every listener must get an independent chance: the `session/flush` durability checkpoint.
 - **emit** (synchronous fire-and-forget) for notifications: inbox transitions, lifecycle, errors, and the contained immutable `tools/result` observation. Durable session events own turn and step boundaries.
 
-The event vocabulary lives in interface packages (dsh-agent declares the agent/* events); `@deepseek-ai/dsh-agent-loop` is the only concrete loop plugin and is itself swappable — nothing outside it may depend on it.
+The event vocabulary lives in contract packages (`dsh-agent` declares the `agent/*` events); `@deepseek-ai/dsh-agent-loop` is the only concrete loop plugin and is itself swappable — nothing outside it may depend on it.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
@@ -28,4 +28,4 @@ The event vocabulary lives in interface packages (dsh-agent declares the agent/*
 - Every MVP feature maps to a listener (the [feature → mechanism map](../../../../docs/cookbook/extension-cookbook.md#the-feature--mechanism-map) is the proof obligation, kept current).
 - HMR and disposal come free: listeners and registrations are Cordis effects.
 - Waterfall semantics (call `next()` or short-circuit) are non-obvious and must be taught — documented in AGENTS.md and covered by composition tests.
-- The loop must be defensive: plugin exceptions are contained at turn level, steering from any seam is never stranded (regression-tested).
+- The loop must be defensive: plugin exceptions are contained at turn level, steering from any extension point is never stranded (regression-tested).

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-microkernel-event-taxonomy.zh.md

@@ -10,14 +10,14 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 决策
 
-纯 Cordis 事件分类体系。agent loop（智能体循环）的扩展 seam 是带类型的事件，具有明确的分发模式：
+纯 Cordis 事件分类体系。agent loop（智能体循环）的扩展点是带类型的事件，具有明确的分发模式：
 
-- **waterfall（瀑布式事件）**（around-middleware）：插件可变换、否决、恢复或包装：`agent/pre-step`、`agent/request`、`agent/request-error`、`tools/pre-execute`、`tools/execute`、`tools/post-execute`、`llm/stream`、`system-prompt/assemble`。
+- **waterfall（瀑布式事件）**（around-middleware）：插件可变换、短路、恢复或包装：`agent/pre-step`、`agent/request`、`agent/request-error`、`tools/pre-execute`、`tools/execute`、`tools/post-execute`、`llm/stream`、`system-prompt/assemble`。
 - **serial**（按监听器顺序依次 await）：用于 `agent/turn-stopping` 等有序检查点。
 - **parallel**（await 扇出）：每个监听器都必须获得独立执行的机会：`session/flush` 持久性检查点。
-- **emit**（同步 fire-and-forget）：用于 inbox 转换、生命周期、错误，以及包含不可变 `tools/result` 观测的事件。轮次与步骤边界由持久会话事件拥有。
+- **emit**（同步 fire-and-forget）：用于通知：inbox 转换、生命周期、错误，以及受错误隔离的 `tools/result` 观测；该观测接收不可变的最终结果。轮次与步骤边界由持久会话事件拥有。
 
-事件词汇定义在接口包中（dsh-agent 声明 agent/* 事件）；`@deepseek-ai/dsh-agent-loop` 是唯一的具体循环插件，且自身可替换——外部不得依赖它。
+事件词汇定义在约定包中（`dsh-agent` 声明 `agent/*` 事件）；`@deepseek-ai/dsh-agent-loop` 是唯一的具体循环插件，且自身可替换——外部不得依赖它。
 
 ## 曾考虑的替代方案
 
@@ -28,4 +28,4 @@ Status: implemented
 - 每个 MVP 功能都映射到一个监听器（[功能→机制映射](../../../../docs/cookbook/extension-cookbook.md#the-feature--mechanism-map)是证明义务，保持更新）。
 - HMR 与 dispose 无需额外工作：监听器和注册均为 Cordis effect。
 - waterfall 语义（调用 `next()` 或短路）不直观，需要教学——在 AGENTS.md 中记录，并由组合测试覆盖。
-- 循环必须具备防御性：插件异常在轮次级别被隔离，任何 seam 发出的 steering（中途引导）永远不会被搁置（有回归测试保障）。
+- 循环必须具备防御性：插件异常在轮次级别被隔离，任何扩展点发出的 steering（中途引导）永远不会被搁置（有回归测试保障）。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-runtime-arg-validation.i18n.yaml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
-#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
-2026-06-11-runtime-arg-validation.md: e0bca0ff24c5adc7ca58007932dff6580694b01d
-2026-06-11-runtime-arg-validation.zh.md: 09958147766b4015d6bebf786c4947b9d2941f74
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-runtime-arg-validation.md
+2026-06-11-runtime-arg-validation.md: 520823c76f147205805d306e97b5461f38b84c35
+2026-06-11-runtime-arg-validation.zh.md: ccb9b50d8b8a932d17516e579a5364321b64577b

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-runtime-arg-validation.md

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ The validator and compiler therefore share exact semantics: the implicit paramet
 
 - The model gets actionable feedback on its own malformed calls instead of an opaque crash, closing the gap between `InferArgs`'s promise and runtime reality.
 - The validator and `InferArgs` must stay in agreement; [a property test](../testing/2026-06-11-property-based-testing.md) generates args satisfying a spec and asserts they pass `validateArgs` (with targeted corruptions rejected), closing that drift risk mechanically.
-- `ToolArgsError` is a plain `Error` with a `code` field for now; if a harness-wide error taxonomy lands it becomes a subclass without changing callers that read `.message`.
+- `ToolArgsError` subclasses `HarnessError` from the [structured error taxonomy](2026-06-11-structured-error-taxonomy.md), keeping its `code` field; callers that read `.message` are unaffected by the hierarchy.
 - Validation cost is negligible next to a model call.
 
 <!-- agent-note-format: alternatives-not-recorded (pre-format Agent Note) -->

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-runtime-arg-validation.zh.md

@@ -6,19 +6,19 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 问题
 
-`defineTool`（[统一 schema DSL](2026-07-20-unified-json-value-schema-dsl.md)）为工具作者的 `execute(args)` 提供了经 `InferArgs<S>` 映射的类型化参数。但该类型只是对运行时值的编译期声明，而这个值实际上是模型生成的 JSON：没有任何机制强制模型遵守 schema，因此畸形调用（缺少必需键、声明为数字的位置传入字符串，或字面量超出声明的集合）会以「仅名义类型化」的状态到达 `execute`。工具函数体随后要么在错误形状上崩溃，要么静默地行为异常。
+`defineTool`（[统一 schema DSL](2026-07-20-unified-json-value-schema-dsl.md)）为工具作者的 `execute(args)` 提供了经 `InferArgs<S>` 映射的类型化参数。但该类型只是对运行时值的编译期声明，而这个值实际上是模型生成的 JSON：没有任何机制强制模型遵守 schema，因此畸形调用（缺少必需键、声明为数字的位置传入字符串，或字面量超出声明的集合）会以「仅在名义上类型化」的状态到达 `execute`。工具函数体随后要么在错误形状上崩溃，要么静默地行为异常。
 
 ## 决策
 
 `validateArgs(spec, args): string[]` 编译 `ParameterSchemaSpec`，并委托共享的 `validateJsonSchemaValue()` 遍历器，对格式正确的声明返回可读的违规列表。`defineTool` 在定义时对编译后的参数 schema 创建快照，并在调用类型化函数体之前执行校验；存在违规时会抛出 `ToolArgsError`（`INVALID_ARGS`），注册表将其作为模型可据以修正的错误结果返回。
 
-校验器与编译器因此共享完全一致的语义：隐式参数根是开放对象；必需键仅来自 `required: true`；默认值仍是注解；显式嵌套对象遵循其声明的开放性；数组通过 `items` 递归；标量字面量约束保证类型正确；`oneOf` 仅在恰好一个分支匹配时才接受。原始注册的工具自行负责输入校验。
+校验器与编译器因此共享完全一致的语义：隐式参数根是开放对象；必需键仅来自 `required: true`；默认值仍是注解；显式嵌套对象遵循其声明的开放性；数组通过 `items` 递归；标量字面量约束保证类型正确；`oneOf` 仅在恰好一个分支匹配时才接受。直接注册的工具自行负责输入校验。
 
 ## 后果
 
 - 模型在自身畸形调用上获得可操作的反馈，而非不透明的崩溃，弥合了 `InferArgs` 的承诺与运行时现实之间的鸿沟。
 - 校验器与 `InferArgs` 必须保持一致；一项[属性测试](../testing/2026-06-11-property-based-testing.md)生成满足 spec 的参数并断言它们通过 `validateArgs`（同时断言定向破坏的参数被拒绝），以机械方式封堵漂移风险。
-- `ToolArgsError` 目前是带 `code` 字段的普通 `Error`；如果日后引入 harness 级别的错误分类体系，它将变为子类，但不影响读取 `.message` 的调用方。
+- `ToolArgsError` 是[结构化错误分类体系](2026-06-11-structured-error-taxonomy.md)中 `HarnessError` 的子类，保留其 `code` 字段；读取 `.message` 的调用方不受该层级结构影响。
 - 校验开销相对于一次模型调用可忽略不计。
 
 <!-- agent-note-format: alternatives-not-recorded (pre-format Agent Note) -->

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-13-capability-seams.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-13-capability-seams.md
-2026-06-13-capability-seams.md: 7c755dced7825d2831acc0901f6412b8e5afe95a
-2026-06-13-capability-seams.zh.md: 3d0fe2b842766838d247aca75972509bf6c7b951
+2026-06-13-capability-seams.md: ca5071cff1b26ba3b89537a73f40d7ecbde4b2bb
+2026-06-13-capability-seams.zh.md: 7790124b980e0525705c2db398802ea6a418685a

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-13-capability-seams.md

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Agent Note: Capability seams — interface / implementation / consumer split
+# Agent Note: Capability seams — Service Definition / Service provider / Consumer roles
 
 Status: implemented
 
@@ -12,21 +12,25 @@ This is distinct from "who provides vs. needs a capability at runtime", which Co
 
 ## Decision
 
-A swappable capability is **three packages**:
+A swappable capability has **three roles**:
 
-1. **Interface** — an abstract service + the vocabulary types, owning the `ctx.<key>` and depending only on its vocabulary dependencies (e.g. `dsh-bash`: `BashExecutor`, `BashRunResult`, `BashProcess`).
-2. **Implementation** — a concrete subclass loaded as a plugin (e.g. `dsh-bash-local`: subprocesses, process-group kills, spill-file truncation). Sandboxed/remote backends are sibling packages implementing the same interface.
-3. **Consumer** — what the model and plugins see (e.g. `dsh-tool-bash`: the `bash` schema, with background handles registered into the generic task runtime). Consumers `inject` the interface key and never import implementation types.
+1. **Service Definition** — the Cordis `Service` and vocabulary types owning `ctx.<key>` and depending only on the vocabulary the contract needs (e.g. `dsh-bash`: `BashExecutor`, `BashRunResult`, `BashProcess`). A definition may be an abstract class or a concrete registry service; it is never a TypeScript `interface`.
+2. **Service provider** — a plugin that supplies or registers an implementation (e.g. `dsh-bash-local`: subprocesses, process-group kills, spill-file truncation). Sandboxed and remote providers are sibling packages implementing or registering against the same Service Definition.
+3. **Consumer** — what the model and plugins program against (e.g. `dsh-tool-bash`: the `bash` schema, with background handles registered into the generic task runtime). Consumers inject the service key and never import provider-specific types.
 
-Implementation and consumer then evolve independently: a sandboxed executor replaces `dsh-bash-local` without touching a tool schema.
+Service providers and Consumers then evolve independently: a sandboxed executor replaces `dsh-bash-local` without touching a tool schema.
 
-The split is not mandatory when the parts are genuinely one concern: the LLM seam folds interface + consumer into `dsh-llm` (the consumer is the loop itself, not a swappable schema surface) with adapters as the implementation packages. Don't split preemptively — a capability with one conceivable implementation and one consumer stays one package until a second appears.
+Roles normally use separate packages when they evolve independently, but the split is not mandatory when the roles are genuinely one concern: the LLM seam folds Service Definition and Consumer into `dsh-llm` (the Consumer is the loop itself, not a swappable schema surface) with adapters as Service provider packages. Don't split preemptively — a capability with one conceivable provider and one Consumer stays one package until a second appears.
+
+## Terminology: "seam" names the trio, not the interface
+
+A **seam** is the whole capability — the three roles together: a **Service Definition** (the Cordis `Service` that owns `ctx.<key>` and the vocabulary), one or more **Service providers**, and one or more **Consumers**. `packages/bash` is the canonical example — `dsh-bash` / `dsh-bash-local`+`dsh-bash-sandbox` / `dsh-tool-bash`. A package may own multiple roles, but one role alone is not the seam. The term "seam" is reserved for this complete capability; name a constituent by its role, class, service, contract, or extension point. The [glossary](../../../../docs/glossary.md#capability-seam) is the canonical entry.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
-- **One combined package** — rejected because it recouples the three rates of change the split exists to separate (the whole point).
-- **`@cordisjs/plugin-capability`** — a different axis entirely: it is a permission/capability-*security* service (named permissions with inheritance, tested against a session via `ctx.capability.test`), a candidate for the deferred permissions/sandbox work on the `tools/pre-execute` deny/ask seam, NOT a mechanism for swapping implementations. Confusing the two ("capability") is the trap this Agent Note names.
+- **Always combine the roles** — rejected because it recouples independently changing Service Definitions, providers, and Consumers.
+- **`@cordisjs/plugin-capability`** — a different axis entirely: it is a permission/capability-*security* service (named permissions with inheritance, tested against a session via `ctx.capability.test`), a candidate for the deferred permissions/sandbox work on the `tools/pre-execute` deny/ask gate, NOT a mechanism for swapping implementations. Confusing the two ("capability") is the trap this Agent Note names.
 
 ## Consequences
 
-More packages and more boilerplate per capability (a `package.json`/`tsconfig`/README trio, the inject wiring). Bought: implementations and consumers ship and version independently, and a new backend never risks the model-facing contract. The rule is documented in [AGENTS.md](../../../../AGENTS.md) § Conventions ("Capability seams are three packages") and [architecture.md](../../../../docs/architecture.md) § "Capability seams"; the bash trio is the reference template. When to fold vs. split is a judgment call the architecture doc spells out — this Agent Note records *why* the default is to split.
+Separating roles adds packages and boilerplate (`package.json`, `tsconfig`, README, and injection wiring). In return, Service providers and Consumers ship and version independently, and a new backend never risks the model-facing contract. [AGENTS.md](../../../../AGENTS.md) and [architecture.md](../../../../docs/architecture.md) carry the rule; the bash trio is the reference template. This Agent Note records why independently changing roles normally split while genuinely shared concerns may remain folded.

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-13-capability-seams.zh.md

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Agent Note: 能力 seam——接口／实现／消费方三分
+# Agent Note: 能力 seam——Service Definition / Service provider / Consumer 角色
 
 Status: implemented
 
@@ -6,27 +6,31 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 问题
 
-harness 具有可替换的能力：当前是 bash 执行，未来会有沙箱化／远程执行器和替代模型提供方。一项能力涉及三个关注点，它们以不同速率、因不同原因变化：*契约*（这项能力是什么）、*实现*（它如何运行）、*消费方接口*（模型和其他插件面向什么编程）。将三者捆绑在一个包中会耦合这些变化速率——把本地执行器换成沙箱化执行器时，模型看到的工具 schema 也会被搅动，尽管面向模型的契约从未改变。
+harness 具有可替换的能力：当前是 bash 执行，未来会有沙箱化／远程执行器和替代模型提供方。一项能力涉及三个关注点，它们以不同速率、因不同原因变化：*约定*（这项能力是什么）、*实现*（它如何运行）、*消费方接口*（模型和其他插件面向什么编程）。将三者捆绑在一个包中会耦合这些变化速率——把本地执行器换成沙箱化执行器时，模型看到的工具 schema 也会被搅动，尽管面向模型的约定从未改变。
 
 这与「谁在运行时提供、谁需要一项能力」是不同的问题，后者 Cordis 已通过服务 + `inject` 解决（提供方注册 `ctx.bash`；消费方声明 `inject: ['bash']`，其 fiber 挂起直到服务存在）。该机制是必要的，但不决定包的边界；本 Agent Note 决定的是包的边界。
 
 ## 决策
 
-一项可替换的能力由**三个包**构成：
+一项可替换的能力包含**三个角色**：
 
-1. **接口**——一个抽象服务加词汇类型，拥有 `ctx.<key>`，仅依赖其词汇依赖（例如 `dsh-bash`：`BashExecutor`、`BashRunResult`、`BashProcess`）。
-2. **实现**——一个具体子类，以插件形式加载（例如 `dsh-bash-local`：子进程、进程组 kill、spill 文件截断）。沙箱化／远程后端是实现同一接口的兄弟包。
-3. **消费方**——模型和插件看到的内容（例如 `dsh-tool-bash`：`bash` schema，后台句柄注册到通用任务运行时）。消费方 `inject` 接口键，从不导入实现类型。
+1. **Service Definition**——拥有 `ctx.<key>` 的 Cordis `Service` 和词汇类型，仅依赖约定所需的词汇（例如 `dsh-bash`：`BashExecutor`、`BashRunResult`、`BashProcess`）。Service Definition 可以是抽象类，也可以是具体的注册表服务；绝不是 TypeScript `interface`。
+2. **Service provider**——提供或注册实现的插件（例如 `dsh-bash-local`：子进程、进程组 kill、spill 文件截断）。沙箱化和远程 Service provider 是依据同一 Service Definition 实现或注册的兄弟包。
+3. **Consumer**——模型和插件编程所面向的内容（例如 `dsh-tool-bash`：`bash` schema，后台句柄注册到通用任务运行时）。Consumer 注入服务键，从不导入 Service provider 特有的类型。
 
-实现与消费方由此独立演进：沙箱化执行器替换 `dsh-bash-local` 时无需触碰任何工具 schema。
+Service provider 与 Consumer 由此独立演进：沙箱化执行器替换 `dsh-bash-local` 时无需触碰任何工具 schema。
 
-当各部分确实属于同一个关注点时，三分并非强制：LLM（大语言模型） seam 将接口 + 消费方合并为 `dsh-llm`（消费方是 agent loop（智能体循环）本身，而非可替换的 schema 接口），适配器作为实现包。不要预防性地拆分——如果一项能力只有一种可设想的实现和一个消费方，就保持为一个包，直到出现第二种实现或第二个消费方。
+当角色独立演进时，通常使用不同的包；但当各角色确实属于同一个关注点时，并非必须拆分：LLM（大语言模型） seam 将 Service Definition 和 Consumer 合并为 `dsh-llm`（Consumer 是 agent loop（智能体循环）本身，而非可替换的 schema 接口），适配器作为 Service provider 包。不要预防性地拆分——如果一项能力只有一种可设想的 Service provider 和一个 Consumer，就保持为一个包，直到出现第二个。
+
+## 术语：seam 指三者组合，而非接口
+
+一个 **seam** 是完整的能力——三个角色合在一起：**Service Definition**（拥有 `ctx.<key>` 和词汇的 Cordis `Service`）、一个或多个 **Service provider**，以及一个或多个 **Consumer**。`packages/bash` 是规范范例——`dsh-bash` / `dsh-bash-local`+`dsh-bash-sandbox` / `dsh-tool-bash`。一个包可以承担多个角色，但单个角色本身不是 seam。「seam」一词严格保留给这种完整能力；命名其中一个组成部分时，应使用其角色、类、服务、约定或扩展点。[术语表](../../../../docs/glossary.md#capability-seam)是规范条目。
 
 ## 曾考虑的替代方案
 
-- **单一合并包**：否决。因为它重新耦合了三分设计本要分离的三种变化速率（这正是拆分的意义所在）。
-- **`@cordisjs/plugin-capability`**：这是完全不同的维度。它是一个权限／能力*安全*服务（具名权限加继承，通过 `ctx.capability.test` 对会话进行检测），是延后的权限/沙箱工作（`tools/pre-execute` deny/ask seam）的候选方案，不是替换实现的机制。混淆这两个「能力」概念正是本 Agent Note 所指出的陷阱。
+- **始终合并各角色**：否决。因为它会重新耦合独立变化的 Service Definition、Service provider 和 Consumer。
+- **`@cordisjs/plugin-capability`**：这是完全不同的维度。它是一个权限／能力*安全*服务（具名权限加继承，通过 `ctx.capability.test` 对会话进行检测），是延后的权限/沙箱工作（`tools/pre-execute` deny/ask 门）的候选方案，不是替换实现的机制。混淆这两个「能力」概念正是本 Agent Note 所指出的陷阱。
 
 ## 后果
 
-每项能力需要更多包和更多样板代码（一组 `package.json`/`tsconfig`/README，加上 inject 接线）。换来的是：实现与消费方独立发布和版本管理，新后端永远不会波及面向模型的契约。该规则记录在 [AGENTS.md](../../../../AGENTS.md) § Conventions（「Capability seams are three packages」）和 [architecture.md](../../../../docs/architecture.md) §「Capability seams」中；bash 三件套是参考模板。何时合并、何时拆分是一个判断问题，架构文档对此有详细说明——本 Agent Note 记录的是*为什么*默认选择拆分。
+分离角色会增加包和样板代码（`package.json`、`tsconfig`、README 和注入接线）。换来的是：Service provider 与 Consumer 独立发布和版本管理，新后端永远不会波及面向模型的约定。[AGENTS.md](../../../../AGENTS.md) 和 [architecture.md](../../../../docs/architecture.md) 载有这项规则；bash 三件套是参考模板。本 Agent Note 记录为什么独立变化的角色通常需要拆分，而确实共享的关注点可以保持合并。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-13-twin-llm-adapters.i18n.yaml

@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-13-twin-llm-adapters.md
 2026-06-13-twin-llm-adapters.md: a4c87325a0b0d1ebe6cf8f95672e5de74ef37d57
-2026-06-13-twin-llm-adapters.zh.md: 753d7900f23c0d3388be0488c291145fdccf5a95
+2026-06-13-twin-llm-adapters.zh.md: 2af7e7cca4d4c40e18cece1a4dd5c9cdb11901c8

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-13-twin-llm-adapters.zh.md

@@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 问题
 
-`dsh-llm` 拥有一套提供方无关的流式词汇：`StreamChunk` 协议（`block-start`、`text-delta`、`reasoning-delta`、`tool-call-delta`、`block-end`、`usage`、`finish`）以及内容块类型（[内容块词汇](2026-06-11-content-block-vocabulary.md)）。如果词汇仅针对单个适配器定义，就有可能将该适配器的特异行为固化到「中立」契约中：唯一实现碰巧做了什么，什么就成为事实上的规范；在第二个提供方到来之前，抽象层未经验证——而届时修复这种泄漏的代价已经很高。
+`dsh-llm` 拥有一套提供方无关的流式词汇：`StreamChunk` 协议（`block-start`、`text-delta`、`reasoning-delta`、`tool-call-delta`、`block-end`、`usage`、`finish`）以及内容块类型（[内容块词汇](2026-06-11-content-block-vocabulary.md)）。如果词汇仅针对单个适配器定义，就有可能将该适配器的特异行为固化到「中立」约定中：唯一实现碰巧做了什么，什么就成为事实上的规范；在第二个提供方到来之前，抽象层未经验证——而届时修复这种泄漏的代价已经很高。
 
 ## 决策
 
-从一开始就针对同一份契约交付**两个**适配器，刻意基于不同的内部实现构建：
+从一开始就针对同一份约定交付**两个**适配器，刻意基于不同的内部实现构建：
 
 - `dsh-llm-deepseek`：直接 `fetch` + 仓库内翻译逻辑对接 DeepSeek API；SSE（Server-Sent Events）分帧委托给 `eventsource-parser`（[已归档的 SSE 解析器替换](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-26-eventsource-parser-for-deepseek-sse.md)）。孪生身份在于自行持有 fetch/translate 内部实现而非委托给完整的提供方 SDK，不在于手写传输层管道。
 - `dsh-llm-pi-ai`：通过 `@earendil-works/pi-ai` 库访问同一端点（该库有自己的事件词汇）。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-14-session-persistence.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-14-session-persistence.md
-2026-06-14-session-persistence.md: 00e129e57c7144fd62eec26f5854ee21dec4e964
-2026-06-14-session-persistence.zh.md: 1c98d5771819e8776d9f5cae4a147d2016ee5978
+2026-06-14-session-persistence.md: 6961b8f3f4274587c2920fe2b2602aff5efe4afc
+2026-06-14-session-persistence.zh.md: 58c8bb80a1f886c986fc5aa1a0ba6b7f263ad829

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-14-session-persistence.md

@@ -12,25 +12,25 @@ The [event-sourced model](2026-06-11-event-sourced-sessions.md) makes the append
 
 ## Decision
 
-Persistence is an abstract **capability seam** ([capability seams](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md), the `dsh-bash` template), not loop or core logic:
+Persistence is a **capability seam** with an abstract Service Definition ([capability seams](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md), the `dsh-bash` template), not loop or core logic:
 
 1. **Interface** (`dsh-session-persistence`, `ctx.sessionPersistence`) — an abstract `SessionPersistence` service: `locate`/`create`/`append`/`prepare`/`load`/`inspect`/`readFrom`/`list`/`listSnapshots`. Its persisted unit IS the existing `SessionEvent` (`{ type, seq, time, data }`), reused verbatim — no conversion type.
 2. **Implementation** (`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl`) — an append-only logical JSONL log per session: a `SessionHeader` line followed by storage records that losslessly represent the contiguous `SessionEvent` stream. Eligible `assistant/chunk` delta runs use packed rows by default; [checksummed Zstandard frames](2026-07-19-zstandard-jsonl-session-logs.md) are the default physical encoding, with raw lines configurable.
 
-Key choices recorded here because they are durable, contested, and surprising:
+Key durable, contested choices:
 
 - **The canonical durable log persists every `SessionEvent` losslessly, including `assistant/chunk`.** JSONL storage may encode a consecutive delta run as one packed row, but logical readers reconstruct the exact event boundaries, sequence numbers, and timestamps. `deriveMessages()` skips chunks, and a chunk-filtered rollout (Codex's `policy.rs`) is tempting — but `seq = log.length` and validation of `events[i].seq === i` require a *contiguous* logical log; filtering chunks out would leave holes and break both the contract and resume. A chunk-filtered projection is possible later as a derived view with its own renumbering, but it is NOT the canonical log.
 - **Append-only; a crashed turn is closed, never truncated.** Flushed events are never rewritten. The [semantic checkpoint policy](../bug-fix/2026-07-21-semantic-session-checkpoints.md) drains the request before model dispatch, a recorded top-level call before tool dispatch, and the complete response/result batch after a step; the loop drains the final turn boundary. Because one interrupted turn may contain substantial valid work, cold inspection preserves its contiguous, parseable events and adds risk-classified error results for unanswered assistant calls, a missing `step/end`, and `turn/end` with `{ kind: 'interrupted' }` to the in-memory logical view. `prepare` or `load` commits those closers before returning a recoverable view; the synthetic results keep resumed provider transcripts valid. Only an incomplete final record is discarded during committed repair; a parse error or sequence gap at or before the last real `turn/end` is corruption and makes the session unloadable.
 - **File backend canonical, DB backend a proven drop-in.** `SessionEvent` maps 1:1 onto a row `(session_id, seq, type, time, data)` — `append` is INSERT (in a transaction asserting the contiguous-seq contract), and reads use SELECT … ORDER BY seq. `dsh-session-persistence-sqlite` is exactly this: a `SessionPersistence` subclass with no interface change (opencode runs this exact shape on SQLite/WAL), and it passes the same `runPersistenceContract` suite as the JSONL backend — so the contract holds both backends to identical semantics (lazy materialization, logical interrupted-turn closure, single committed repair, contiguous-seq), expressed once over file bytes and once over rows. Its database carries a dedicated application id and monotonic schema version. A pristine file creates all tables and stamps both header values in one transaction; an unversioned file with any user-defined schema object or application identity, a foreign current-version identity, and every non-current version reject before journal-mode mutation.
-- **Metadata is out-of-log.** Format version, cwd, and lineage are storage concerns, not replayable conversation state, so they live in a `SessionHeader` owned by `dsh-session` and attached to a `Session` via a new readonly `session.header` — never in `SessionEventMap`, never reaching `deriveMessages()`. `createdAt` is non-negative safe-integer Unix epoch milliseconds: live creation and persistence registration reject fractional values, JSONL validates the decoded header, and SQLite stores it in a strict `INTEGER` column. The alternative (a merge-extensible `session/meta` event as log line 0) was rejected: an in-log event would ride along with a seeded/forked session for free, but metadata is not replayable state, so the explicit out-of-log header seam is the cleaner cost. (The header was originally split into an immutable `SessionHeader` plus a mutable `SessionSummary` whose union was `SessionMeta`; the mutable summary was later removed as dead state — see [Drop the mutable session summary](../simplification/2026-06-19-drop-mutable-session-summary.md).)
+- **Metadata is out-of-log.** Format version, cwd, and lineage are storage concerns, not replayable conversation state, so they live in a `SessionHeader` owned by `dsh-session` and attached to a `Session` via a new readonly `session.header` — never in `SessionEventMap`, never reaching `deriveMessages()`. `createdAt` is non-negative safe-integer Unix epoch milliseconds: live creation and persistence registration reject fractional values, JSONL validates the decoded header, and SQLite stores it in a strict `INTEGER` column. The alternative (a merge-extensible `session/meta` event as log line 0) was rejected: an in-log event would ride along with a seeded/forked session for free, but metadata is not replayable state, so the explicit out-of-log header boundary is the cleaner cost. (The header was originally split into an immutable `SessionHeader` plus a mutable `SessionSummary` whose union was `SessionMeta`; the mutable summary was later removed as dead state — see [Drop the mutable session summary](../simplification/2026-06-19-drop-mutable-session-summary.md).)
 - **`ctx.agents.create()` and `ctx.agents.resume()` are async factories; resume additionally crosses the persistence boundary.** `ctx.agents.resume({ resumeSessionId })` obtains the exact unpublished Session through `ctx.sessionPersistence.prepare()`, publishes it under the persisted id, and continues its projections. The [Session preparation decision](2026-08-05-session-preparation.md) owns reuse between history inspection and resume. The agent-loop does NOT hard-inject `sessionPersistence` (that would pend non-persistent demos forever); `resume` rejects with a clear error when it is absent.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
 Each key choice above records its rejected alternative where the choice is stated: a **chunk-filtered canonical log** (Codex's `policy.rs` shape) — breaks the contiguous-seq contract; **truncating a crashed turn** — silently destroys a long autonomous run's real work; an **in-log `session/meta` event as line 0** — metadata is not replayable state; **finite fractional `createdAt` values** — have no producer and diverge from integer Unix-millisecond storage and query columns; **adopting a non-pristine unversioned SQLite file** — can overwrite unrelated objects or identity; **hard-injecting `sessionPersistence` into the loop** — would pend non-persistent demos forever.
 
-Format versioning: the header carries a `version`; cold reads reject any non-current version. The pre-release session format stays pinned at `SESSION_FORMAT_VERSION = 0` and carries no broad compatibility promise, while the coordinator may own an explicit narrow import upgrade when persisted user data requires it ([pre-identity message recovery](../bug-fix/2026-07-28-load-pre-identity-session-messages.md)). Stated honestly: append-only + flush is robust to partial trailing writes (tolerated during cold preparation) but not to fsync-less power loss mid-line; a DB/WAL backend is the stronger option later.
+Format versioning: the header carries a `version`; cold reads reject any non-current version. The pre-release session format stays pinned at `SESSION_FORMAT_VERSION = 0` and carries no broad compatibility promise, while the coordinator may own an explicit narrow import upgrade when persisted user data requires it ([pre-identity message recovery](../bug-fix/2026-07-28-load-pre-identity-session-messages.md)). Append-only + flush is robust to partial trailing writes (tolerated during cold preparation) but not to fsync-less power loss mid-line; a DB/WAL backend is the stronger option there.
 
 ## Consequences
 
-Two new packages and the metadata seam in `dsh-session` (`session.header`, the `create(id?, options?)` signature). Bought: durable resume/fork, a read/replay path, crash tolerance, and host-side session access over the existing event-sourced log, with the backend swappable behind one interface. The reusable `runPersistenceContract` suite holds every backend to the same append-only, contiguous-seq, lazy-materialization, logical-recovery, integer-metadata, and serializability semantics. Persisting the full logical log also settles event fidelity: every `assistant/chunk` survives exactly even when JSONL packs several into one storage row. SQLite initialization either commits its complete owned schema and header identity or leaves no partial schema to strand on the next open.
+Two new packages and the metadata contract in `dsh-session` (`session.header`, the `create(id?, options?)` signature). Bought: durable resume/fork, a read/replay path, crash tolerance, and host-side session access over the existing event-sourced log, with the backend swappable behind one interface. The reusable `runPersistenceContract` suite holds every backend to the same append-only, contiguous-seq, lazy-materialization, logical-recovery, integer-metadata, and serializability semantics. Persisting the full logical log also settles event fidelity: every `assistant/chunk` survives exactly even when JSONL packs several into one storage row. SQLite initialization either commits its complete owned schema and header identity or leaves no partial schema to strand on the next open.

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-14-session-persistence.zh.md

@@ -12,25 +12,25 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 决策
 
-持久化是一个抽象的**能力 seam**（[能力 seam](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md)，`dsh-bash` 模板），而非循环或核心逻辑：
+持久化是一个具有抽象 Service Definition 的**能力 seam**（[能力 seam](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md)，`dsh-bash` 模板），而非循环或核心逻辑：
 
 1. **接口**（`dsh-session-persistence`，`ctx.sessionPersistence`）：一个抽象的 `SessionPersistence` 服务，提供 `locate`/`create`/`append`/`prepare`/`load`/`inspect`/`readFrom`/`list`/`listSnapshots`。其持久化单元就是现有的 `SessionEvent`（`{ type, seq, time, data }`），原样复用，无转换类型。
 2. **实现**（`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl`）：每个会话一个仅追加的逻辑 JSONL 日志：先是一行 `SessionHeader`，随后是无损表示连续 `SessionEvent` 流的存储记录。符合条件的 `assistant/chunk` 增量连续段默认使用打包行；[带校验和的 Zstandard 帧](2026-07-19-zstandard-jsonl-session-logs.md)是默认物理编码，也可通过配置使用原始行。
 
-以下关键选择记录于此，因为它们长期有效、存在争议且出人意料：
+长期有效、存在争议的关键选择：
 
-- **规范的持久日志无损保留每个 `SessionEvent`，包括 `assistant/chunk`。** JSONL 存储可以将一段连续的增量事件编码为一条打包行，但逻辑读取方会重建精确的事件边界、序号与时间戳。`deriveMessages()` 跳过分片，而过滤分片的方案（Codex 的 `policy.rs`）很有吸引力，但 `seq = log.length` 以及 `events[i].seq === i` 验证要求*连续*的逻辑日志；过滤掉分片会留下空洞，同时破坏契约和恢复功能。基于分片过滤的投影可以作为派生视图在后续实现（带有自己的重新编号），但它不是规范日志。
+- **规范的持久日志无损保留每个 `SessionEvent`，包括 `assistant/chunk`。** JSONL 存储可以将一段连续的增量事件编码为一条打包行，但逻辑读取方会重建精确的事件边界、序号与时间戳。`deriveMessages()` 跳过分片，而过滤分片的方案（Codex 的 `policy.rs`）很有吸引力，但 `seq = log.length` 以及 `events[i].seq === i` 验证要求*连续*的逻辑日志；过滤掉分片会留下空洞，同时破坏约定和恢复功能。基于分片过滤的投影可以作为派生视图在后续实现（带有自己的重新编号），但它不是规范日志。
 - **仅追加；崩溃的轮次被关闭，而非截断。** 已刷写的事件永不被重写。[语义检查点策略](../bug-fix/2026-07-21-semantic-session-checkpoints.md)会在模型分发前排空请求、在工具分发前排空已记录的顶层调用，并在步骤结束后排空完整的响应/结果批次；循环则排空最终轮次边界。由于一个被中断的轮次可能包含大量有效工作，冷检查会保留其连续、可解析的事件，并在内存逻辑视图中为未应答的 assistant 调用添加按风险分类的错误结果、补一个缺失的 `step/end`，以及带 `{ kind: 'interrupted' }` 的 `turn/end`。`prepare` 或 `load` 在返回可恢复视图前提交这些 closer；合成结果保证恢复后的提供方 transcript（文本记录）仍然有效。只有不完整的最后一条记录会在提交修复时被丢弃；在最后一个真实 `turn/end` 处或之前出现解析错误或序号间隙，属于数据损坏，会使该会话不可加载。
-- **文件后端为规范实现，数据库后端为经过验证的直接替换。** `SessionEvent` 1:1 映射到一行 `(session_id, seq, type, time, data)`：`append` 是 INSERT（在一个断言连续 seq 契约的事务中），读取使用 SELECT … ORDER BY seq。`dsh-session-persistence-sqlite` 正是如此：一个 `SessionPersistence` 子类，接口无变化（opencode 在 SQLite/WAL 上运行的正是这个形状），且通过与 JSONL 后端相同的 `runPersistenceContract` 测试套件。该契约以相同的语义约束两个后端（惰性物化、逻辑关闭中断轮次、修复只提交一次、连续 seq），一次表达在文件字节上，一次表达在数据库行上。其数据库拥有专用的 application id 与单调递增的 schema 版本。系统会在一个事务中为全新文件创建所有表并写入这两个 header 值；未版本化文件若带有任何用户定义的 schema 对象或应用标识、当前版本文件若带有外部应用标识，以及任何非当前版本文件，都会在修改日志模式之前被拒绝。
-- **元数据在日志之外。** 格式版本、cwd 和谱系是存储关注点，不是可回放的对话状态，因此它们存放在 `dsh-session` 拥有的 `SessionHeader` 中，并通过新的只读属性 `session.header` 附加到 `Session` 上——永远不进入 `SessionEventMap`，永远不到达 `deriveMessages()`。`createdAt` 是以 Unix epoch 毫秒表示的非负安全整数：运行时创建和持久化注册会拒绝小数值，JSONL 会验证解码后的 header，SQLite 则将其存入严格的 `INTEGER` 列。替代方案（一个可合并扩展的 `session/meta` 事件作为日志第 0 行）被否决：日志内事件会自然随 seed/fork 的会话携带，但元数据不是可回放状态，因此显式的日志外 header seam 是更清晰的取舍。（header 最初被拆分为不可变的 `SessionHeader` 加可变的 `SessionSummary`，二者的联合类型为 `SessionMeta`；可变 summary 后来因属于死状态而被移除——见 [移除可变会话摘要](../simplification/2026-06-19-drop-mutable-session-summary.md)。）
+- **文件后端为规范实现，数据库后端为经过验证的直接替换。** `SessionEvent` 1:1 映射到一行 `(session_id, seq, type, time, data)`：`append` 是 INSERT（在一个断言连续 seq 约定的事务中），读取使用 SELECT … ORDER BY seq。`dsh-session-persistence-sqlite` 正是如此：一个 `SessionPersistence` 子类，接口无变化（opencode 在 SQLite/WAL 上运行的正是这个形状），且通过与 JSONL 后端相同的 `runPersistenceContract` 测试套件。该约定以相同的语义约束两个后端（惰性物化、逻辑关闭中断轮次、修复只提交一次、连续 seq），一次表达在文件字节上，一次表达在数据库行上。其数据库拥有专用的 application id 与单调递增的 schema 版本。系统会在一个事务中为全新文件创建所有表并写入这两个 header 值；未版本化文件若带有任何用户定义的 schema 对象或应用标识、当前版本文件若带有外部应用标识，以及任何非当前版本文件，都会在修改日志模式之前被拒绝。
+- **元数据在日志之外。** 格式版本、cwd 和谱系是存储关注点，不是可回放的对话状态，因此它们存放在 `dsh-session` 拥有的 `SessionHeader` 中，并通过新的只读属性 `session.header` 附加到 `Session` 上——永远不进入 `SessionEventMap`，永远不到达 `deriveMessages()`。`createdAt` 是以 Unix epoch 毫秒表示的非负安全整数：运行时创建和持久化注册会拒绝小数值，JSONL 会验证解码后的 header，SQLite 则将其存入严格的 `INTEGER` 列。替代方案（一个可合并扩展的 `session/meta` 事件作为日志第 0 行）被否决：日志内事件会自然随 seed/fork 的会话携带，但元数据不是可回放状态，因此显式的日志外 header 边界是更清晰的取舍。（header 最初被拆分为不可变的 `SessionHeader` 加可变的 `SessionSummary`，二者的联合类型为 `SessionMeta`；可变 summary 后来因属于死状态而被移除——见 [移除可变会话摘要](../simplification/2026-06-19-drop-mutable-session-summary.md)。）
 - **`ctx.agents.create()` 和 `ctx.agents.resume()` 是异步工厂；恢复还跨越持久化边界。** `ctx.agents.resume({ resumeSessionId })` 通过 `ctx.sessionPersistence.prepare()` 取得精确的未发布 Session，以持久化 id 发布它，并继续其投影。[Session 准备阶段决策](2026-08-05-session-preparation.md)定义历史检查与恢复之间的复用。agent loop（智能体循环）不会硬注入 `sessionPersistence`（那样会让非持久化的演示永远挂起）；当它不存在时，`resume` 会以明确的错误拒绝。
 
 ## 曾考虑的替代方案
 
-上述每个关键选择都在陈述处记录了被否决的替代方案：**过滤分片的规范日志**（Codex 的 `policy.rs` 形式）破坏连续 seq 契约；**截断崩溃的轮次**会静默销毁长时间自主运行中的真实工作；**日志内 `session/meta` 事件作为第 0 行**——元数据不是可回放状态；**有限的非整数 `createdAt` 值**没有生产方，且与整数 Unix 毫秒存储及查询列不一致；**接受非全新的未版本化 SQLite 文件**可能覆盖无关对象或应用标识；**将 `sessionPersistence` 硬注入循环**会让非持久化的演示永远挂起。
+上述每个关键选择都在陈述处记录了被否决的替代方案：**过滤分片的规范日志**（Codex 的 `policy.rs` 形式）破坏连续 seq 约定；**截断崩溃的轮次**会静默销毁长时间自主运行中的真实工作；**日志内 `session/meta` 事件作为第 0 行**——元数据不是可回放状态；**有限的非整数 `createdAt` 值**没有生产方，且与整数 Unix 毫秒存储及查询列不一致；**接受非全新的未版本化 SQLite 文件**可能覆盖无关对象或应用标识；**将 `sessionPersistence` 硬注入循环**会让非持久化的演示永远挂起。
 
-格式版本控制：header 携带一个 `version`；冷读取拒绝任何非当前版本。预发布阶段的会话格式仍固定为 `SESSION_FORMAT_VERSION = 0`，不承诺广泛兼容；当持久化用户数据确有需要时，协调器可以负责显式且范围受限的导入升级（[消息标识机制引入前的消息恢复](../bug-fix/2026-07-28-load-pre-identity-session-messages.md)）。坦率地说：仅追加 + 刷写对部分尾部写入是健壮的（冷准备时容忍），但对行写入中途的无 fsync 断电不健壮；数据库/WAL 后端是后续更强的选项。
+格式版本控制：header 携带一个 `version`；冷读取拒绝任何非当前版本。预发布阶段的会话格式仍固定为 `SESSION_FORMAT_VERSION = 0`，不承诺广泛兼容；当持久化用户数据确有需要时，协调器可以负责显式且范围受限的导入升级（[消息标识机制引入前的消息恢复](../bug-fix/2026-07-28-load-pre-identity-session-messages.md)）。仅追加 + 刷写对部分尾部写入是健壮的（冷准备时容忍），但对行写入中途的无 fsync 断电不健壮；数据库/WAL 后端是该场景下更强的选项。
 
 ## 后果
 
-新增两个包，以及 `dsh-session` 中的元数据 seam（`session.header`，`create(id?, options?)` 签名）。收益：持久恢复/fork、读取/回放路径、崩溃容忍，以及基于现有事件溯源日志的宿主侧会话访问，后端可在同一接口下替换。可复用的 `runPersistenceContract` 测试套件以相同的仅追加、连续 seq、惰性物化、逻辑恢复、整数元数据与可序列化语义约束每个后端。持久化完整的逻辑日志还确定了事件保真度：即使 JSONL 将多个 `assistant/chunk` 打包到一条存储行中，每个事件也会精确保留。SQLite 初始化要么提交完整的自有 schema 与 header 标识，要么不留下任何会使下次打开受阻的部分 schema。
+新增两个包，以及 `dsh-session` 中的元数据约定（`session.header`，`create(id?, options?)` 签名）。收益：持久恢复/fork、读取/回放路径、崩溃容忍，以及基于现有事件溯源日志的宿主侧会话访问，后端可在同一接口下替换。可复用的 `runPersistenceContract` 测试套件以相同的仅追加、连续 seq、惰性物化、逻辑恢复、整数元数据与可序列化语义约束每个后端。持久化完整的逻辑日志还确定了事件保真度：即使 JSONL 将多个 `assistant/chunk` 打包到一条存储行中，每个事件也会精确保留。SQLite 初始化要么提交完整的自有 schema 与 header 标识，要么不留下任何会使下次打开受阻的部分 schema。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.md
-2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.md: fee0161e5e8397ac1d1c0e2850efad840c65d971
-2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.zh.md: 46e3ad22c530319d0d1b6ba23a8aba8ffc2fdb8c
+2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.md: 928ad4926e46ed5b6b35552b75882d565d8ad6db
+2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.zh.md: 02af77a3cc291eeba2be966a4bc08aa006675e7d

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.zh.md)
 
 ## Problem
 
-The harness has a concrete `bash` capability seam (`dsh-bash` / `dsh-bash-local` / `dsh-tool-bash`), but filesystem operations are about to be added as model-facing tools without an equivalent seam. If `read`, `write`, and `edit` directly use `node:fs`, the model-facing tool package will own filesystem execution policy, local path resolution, atomic write behavior, text decoding, symlink behavior, and edit semantics all at once.
+The harness has a concrete `bash` capability seam (`dsh-bash` / `dsh-bash-local` / `dsh-tool-bash`), but filesystem operations were about to land as model-facing tools without an equivalent seam. If `read`, `write`, and `edit` directly used `node:fs`, the model-facing tool package would own filesystem execution policy, local path resolution, atomic write behavior, text decoding, symlink behavior, and edit semantics all at once.
 
 That couples three concerns that change independently:
 
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ That couples three concerns that change independently:
 
 Without a `ctx.fs` interface, swapping local filesystem access for a sandboxed or remote backend would churn the tool schemas, demos, and prompt guidance even when the model-facing contract should stay stable. It also makes permission/sandbox boundaries harder to reason about: a `cwd` option can look like a sandbox even though it is only a base path unless an explicit backend or `tools/execute` policy enforces containment.
 
-We need the filesystem tools to land in the same capability-seam shape as bash before they become a public package surface.
+The filesystem tools must land in the same capability-seam shape as bash before they become a public package surface.
 
 ## Decision
 
@@ -26,9 +26,9 @@ Filesystem access is a first-class capability seam following [the capability-sea
 2. `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs-local` (`packages/fs/fs-local`) provides the first implementation, backed by the local filesystem.
 3. `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-fs` (`packages/fs/tool-fs`) provides the model-facing `read`, `write`, and `edit` tools over `ctx.fs`, and is the executor that dispatches the `fs/*` events.
 
-The consumer package depends only on the interface package, never on `dsh-fs-local`. A deployment that wants a different backend loads a different provider for `ctx.fs` without changing the tool schemas or model-facing prompt guidance.
+The Consumer package depends only on the Service Definition package, never on `dsh-fs-local`. A deployment that wants a different backend loads a different provider for `ctx.fs` without changing the tool schemas or model-facing prompt guidance.
 
-The read-before-write/edit and observed-state policy is a fourth package, `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs-policy` (`packages/fs/fs-policy`), contributed through the `fs/*` event gate rather than living on `ctx.fs`; a deployment loading `dsh-tool-fs` also loads `dsh-fs-policy` to get read-before-write/edit. This Agent Note established the three-package seam; the split of policy off the provider base class is decided by [the split-fs-seam Agent Note](../simplification/2026-06-26-fsspec-style-fs-seam.md), and its realization as an event-gate plugin (not a method service) by [the event-gate Agent Note](2026-06-26-file-context-as-event-gate.md). This document is updated to describe that landed four-package shape.
+The read-before-write/edit and observed-state policy is a fourth package, `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs-policy` (`packages/fs/fs-policy`), contributed through the `fs/*` event gate rather than living on `ctx.fs`; a deployment loading `dsh-tool-fs` also loads `dsh-fs-policy` to get read-before-write/edit. This decision established the three-package boundary; the split of policy off the provider base class is decided by [the split-fs-seam Agent Note](../simplification/2026-06-26-fsspec-style-fs-seam.md), and its realization as an event-gate plugin (not a method service) by [the event-gate Agent Note](2026-06-26-file-context-as-event-gate.md).
 
 The first backend is deliberately local-only: `dsh-fs-local` implements `ctx.fs` against the host filesystem. Future sibling backends can provide sandboxed, remote, virtual, or project-scoped filesystems behind the same interface.
 
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ The filesystem seam uses the same dependency direction as the bash trio:
 
 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-fs` depends on `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs`, `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tools`, `@deepseek-ai/dsh-system-prompt`, and `cordis`. It registers model-facing tools and prompt sections. It must not import `node:fs`, `node:path`, or `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs-local`; filesystem execution always goes through `ctx.fs`. If the implementation needs concrete agent or session helper types, those dependencies belong in `tool-fs`; they must not leak back into `dsh-fs`.
 
-The root `tool-fs` plugin registers the full filesystem tool suite (`read`, `write`, and `edit`) by composing the per-tool registration helpers. It injects `fs` and never imports an implementation package.
+The root `tool-fs` plugin registers the full filesystem tool suite (`read`, `write`, and `edit`) by composing the per-tool registration helpers. It injects `fs` and never imports a Service provider package.
 
 ## `ctx.fs` contract
 
@@ -62,18 +62,19 @@ The root `tool-fs` plugin registers the full filesystem tool suite (`read`, `wri
 The interface covers these semantic operations:
 
 - Resolve a model/plugin-supplied path into a backend-defined target.
+- Convert a resolved target to the canonical process path or `file:` URI for the same execution world, and test containment without parsing its opaque key.
 - Stat target metadata without reading file contents.
-- Read a bounded UTF-8 text page from a target.
+- Read complete or streamed UTF-8 text; consumers apply their own view and retention limits.
 - Create or replace a UTF-8 text file.
 - Edit an existing UTF-8 text file by literal replacement.
 
-The provider seam also carries the freshness hooks that policy builds on — but the observed-state store and owner derivation live in the `dsh-fs-policy` plugin, not on `ctx.fs`:
+The provider contract also carries the freshness hooks that policy builds on — but the observed-state store and owner derivation live in the `dsh-fs-policy` plugin, not on `ctx.fs`:
 
 - The backend mints an opaque `version` token per target (in `stat` and in every read/mutation outcome).
 - `writeText`/`editText` take an OPTIONAL version expectation: omit it for an unconditional bare-provider mutation, or supply it to guard the mutation inside the backend's atomic critical section.
 - The `dsh-fs-policy` plugin decides that expectation on `fs/write-intent`/`fs/edit-intent` and records observed versions on `fs/observed`, keyed by an owner it derives from the opaque event actor (normally `exec.agent.session`).
 
-Authorization is version freshness, not a full/partial view distinction: any read records the target's version, and a later write/edit is authorized as long as the file is still at that version — so a windowed read of lines 100-150 authorizes an edit of line 120. The observed-state store is a `WeakMap<owner, Map<targetKey, version>>` inside `dsh-fs-policy`; `dsh-fs` holds none of it and treats the actor as opaque. (This Agent Note first modeled a `FileState` cache with `full`/`partial` views on `ctx.fs`; the split-fs-seam and event-gate Agent Notes replaced that with the freshness-based policy plugin described here.)
+Authorization is version freshness, not a full/partial view distinction: any read records the target's version, and a later write/edit is authorized as long as the file is still at that version — so a windowed read of lines 100-150 authorizes an edit of line 120. The observed-state store is a `WeakMap<owner, Map<targetKey, version>>` inside `dsh-fs-policy`; `dsh-fs` holds none of it and treats the actor as opaque. (This decision first modeled a `FileState` cache with `full`/`partial` views on `ctx.fs`; the split-fs-seam and event-gate notes replaced that with the freshness-based policy plugin described here.)
 
 Path resolution is explicit and allowed to be async. Local resolution may only normalize a path, but sandboxed/remote/project-scoped backends may need I/O to resolve a user-supplied path into a stable target identity.
 
@@ -83,9 +84,11 @@ Resolved targets must expose at least three concepts:
 - An opaque `targetKey`, used for stale guards and file-state lookup. The local backend might use a realpath-like key; a remote backend might use a workspace URI or file id. Consumers must not parse or assume this is a local absolute path.
 - A `displayPath`, used for model/UI-facing output. It may be a local absolute path, workspace-relative path, or remote URI depending on the backend.
 
+`targetKey` remains opaque even when another capability shares the provider's execution world. Such consumers ask the provider for `processPath(target)`, `fileUrl(target)`, or `contains(parent, child)`; the [portable execution-world decision](2026-07-28-portable-execution-world-consumers.md) owns why these facts sit on the filesystem seam.
+
 Read and mutation results must include an opaque file `version`. The local backend derives its token from bigint stat metadata (`dev`, `ino`, `size`, `mtimeNs`, and `ctimeNs`) so same-size rewrites and inode replacement invalidate consumers reliably; a remote backend can use a revision id or hash-like token. The `dsh-fs-policy` plugin records versions for stale checks; consumers may display related metadata but must not interpret the version token.
 
-The provider hands back decoded text: `readText` returns a whole regular text file, `streamText` streams the same text semantics for large files. Both own regular-file checks, bounded line/output handling is NOT theirs — line windowing, numbered-line rendering, and total-line accounting live in the executor (`dsh-tool-fs`), which reads through `ctx.fs` and renders the model-facing window. The provider owns UTF-8 decoding and binary/NUL rejection; it does not know about line windows or views.
+The provider hands back decoded text: `readText` returns a whole regular text file and `streamText` streams the same text semantics for large files or consumer-owned retention limits. Line windowing, byte ceilings, numbered-line rendering, and total-line accounting live in consumers such as `dsh-tool-fs` and `dsh-lsp-local`. The provider owns regular-file checks, UTF-8 decoding, and binary/NUL rejection; it does not know about line windows, protocol limits, or views.
 
 Observed-state recording is not on `ctx.fs`: after a successful read the executor emits `fs/observed`, and the `dsh-fs-policy` plugin records `{ version }` for the deriving owner. There is no `full`/`partial` view — a read at any window records the version, and freshness (not view completeness) authorizes a later write/edit.
 
@@ -124,7 +127,7 @@ The root plugin registers the full suite by composing the per-tool registration
 
 ## Testing
 
-Tests follow the package boundary, not only the user-visible tools: the service seam in `dsh-fs`; real filesystem behavior through the `ctx.fs` interface in `dsh-fs-local` (resolution, symlinks, streaming, binary/UTF-8 rejection, unconditional and version-guarded writes, literal-edit semantics, line-ending preservation, structured `FsError` codes); the consumer surface in `dsh-tool-fs` against the real local provider (mock only the model/clock, never the collaborator); and integration through `ctx.tools.execute()` with and without `dsh-fs-policy`, world-verified by reading files back from disk rather than trusting either the canonical value or rendered content. The observed-state/owner-derivation policy is tested in `dsh-fs-policy`, not here.
+Tests follow the package boundary, not only the user-visible tools: the service contract in `dsh-fs`; real filesystem behavior through the `ctx.fs` interface in `dsh-fs-local` (resolution, symlinks, streaming, binary/UTF-8 rejection, unconditional and version-guarded writes, literal-edit semantics, line-ending preservation, structured `FsError` codes); the consumer surface in `dsh-tool-fs` against the real local provider (mock only the model/clock, never the collaborator); and integration through `ctx.tools.execute()` with and without `dsh-fs-policy`, world-verified by reading files back from disk rather than trusting either the canonical value or rendered content. The observed-state/owner-derivation policy is tested in `dsh-fs-policy`, not here.
 
 The defensive-pattern classes this repo has been bitten by are pinned directly:
 
@@ -136,7 +139,7 @@ The defensive-pattern classes this repo has been bitten by are pinned directly:
 ## Alternatives considered
 
 - **Model-facing tools directly over `node:fs`** — the tool package would own execution policy, path resolution, atomic writes, text decoding, and edit semantics at once, coupling the three independently-changing concerns the Problem names and churning schemas on any backend swap.
-- **One combined `dsh-fs-tools` package** — the pre-seam shape; rejected for the same interface/implementation/consumer split as bash, and the combined name never became public surface.
+- **One combined `dsh-fs-tools` package** — the pre-seam shape; rejected for the same Service Definition / Service provider / Consumer split as bash, and the combined name never became public surface.
 - **Observed-state on `ctx.fs`** — the shape this Agent Note first landed; superseded by [the split-fs-seam Agent Note](../simplification/2026-06-26-fsspec-style-fs-seam.md) and [the event-gate Agent Note](2026-06-26-file-context-as-event-gate.md): a sandboxed/remote backend must not inherit model-facing observation policy, so the provider keeps only the version token and the optional version-guarded mutation.
 
 ## Consequences
@@ -145,11 +148,11 @@ The defensive-pattern classes this repo has been bitten by are pinned directly:
 
 **The interface can become too local.** Returning fields such as `absolutePath` from `ctx.fs` would make remote, sandboxed, or virtual backends awkward. The contract should expose display metadata without requiring consumers to understand host paths.
 
-**The interface can become too thin.** If `ctx.fs` only mirrors `node:fs` primitives, `tool-fs` will reimplement binary detection, pagination, atomic writes, and edit semantics. That recreates the coupling this Agent Note is trying to avoid.
+**The interface can become too thin.** If `ctx.fs` only mirrors `node:fs` primitives, `tool-fs` will reimplement binary detection, pagination, atomic writes, and edit semantics. That recreates the coupling this decision avoids.
 
 **Edit semantics are race-prone by nature.** Literal edit is a read-modify-write operation; the guard is the backend's atomic mutation critical section plus the optional version expectation, so concurrent edits settle deterministically — one wins, the other gets `FS_STALE_VERSION`.
 
-**Observed state does not belong on `ctx.fs`.** Recording what an execution context has seen is workflow policy, not raw filesystem I/O. This Agent Note first placed it inside the filesystem seam; the split-fs-seam Agent Note then established that a sandboxed/remote backend should not inherit model-facing observation policy, and moved it into the `dsh-fs-policy` plugin. The provider seam keeps only what write/edit safety genuinely needs at the storage layer — a backend-minted version token and an optional version-guarded mutation — while the policy plugin owns owner derivation, observed-state, and read-before-edit gating over the `fs/*` events.
+**Observed state does not belong on `ctx.fs`.** Recording what an execution context has seen is workflow policy, not raw filesystem I/O. This decision first placed it inside the filesystem seam; the split-fs-seam note then established that a sandboxed/remote backend should not inherit model-facing observation policy, and moved it into the `dsh-fs-policy` plugin. The provider contract keeps only what write/edit safety genuinely needs at the storage layer — a backend-minted version token and an optional version-guarded mutation — while the policy plugin owns owner derivation, observed-state, and read-before-edit gating over the `fs/*` events.
 
 **The `resolve`-then-operate shape costs an extra round-trip per call.** Each tool may resolve a path to an `FsTarget` and then issue the read/write/edit as a separate `ctx.fs` call. For the local backend this is negligible (resolution is in-memory path normalization), but a remote/sandboxed backend may turn each step into its own request, so a single `read` can become two network round-trips. Backends where the round-trip matters can cache or fold resolution internally while preserving the observable contract.
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.zh.md

@@ -6,17 +6,17 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 问题
 
-harness 已有一个具体的 `bash` 能力 seam（`dsh-bash` / `dsh-bash-local` / `dsh-tool-bash`），但文件系统操作即将作为面向模型的工具加入，却没有等价的 seam。如果 `read`、`write` 和 `edit` 直接使用 `node:fs`，面向模型的工具包将同时承担文件系统执行策略、本地路径解析、原子写入行为、文本解码、符号链接行为和编辑语义。
+harness 已有一个具体的 `bash` 能力 seam（`dsh-bash` / `dsh-bash-local` / `dsh-tool-bash`），但文件系统操作当时即将作为面向模型的工具落地，却没有等价的 seam。如果 `read`、`write` 和 `edit` 直接使用 `node:fs`，面向模型的工具包就会同时承担文件系统执行策略、本地路径解析、原子写入行为、文本解码、符号链接行为和编辑语义。
 
 这把三个独立变化的关注点耦合在了一起：
 
-1. 文件系统契约：插件可以请求哪些操作。
+1. 文件系统约定：插件可以请求哪些操作。
 2. 后端：当前是本地磁盘，未来可能是沙箱/远程/项目作用域的文件系统。
 3. 消费方接口：面向模型的 `read` / `write` / `edit` schema 与结果格式化。
 
-如果没有 `ctx.fs` 接口，将本地文件系统访问替换为沙箱或远程后端时，即使面向模型的契约应当保持稳定，工具 schema、演示和提示词引导也会被迫变动。这还使权限/沙箱边界更难推理：一个 `cwd` 选项看起来像沙箱，但除非有显式的后端或 `tools/execute` 策略强制隔离，否则它只是一个基础路径。
+如果没有 `ctx.fs` 接口，将本地文件系统访问替换为沙箱或远程后端时，即使面向模型的约定应当保持稳定，工具 schema、演示和提示词引导也会被迫变动。这还使权限/沙箱边界更难推理：一个 `cwd` 选项看起来像沙箱，但除非有显式的后端或 `tools/execute` 策略强制隔离，否则它只是一个基础路径。
 
-我们需要文件系统工具在成为公开包接口之前，以与 bash 相同的能力 seam 形态落地。
+文件系统工具必须在成为公开包（package）接口之前，以与 bash 相同的能力 seam 形态落地。
 
 ## 决策
 
@@ -26,9 +26,9 @@ harness 已有一个具体的 `bash` 能力 seam（`dsh-bash` / `dsh-bash-local`
 2. `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs-local`（`packages/fs/fs-local`）提供第一个实现，以本地文件系统为后端。
 3. `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-fs`（`packages/fs/tool-fs`）通过 `ctx.fs` 提供面向模型的 `read`、`write` 和 `edit` 工具，是分发 `fs/*` 事件的执行器。
 
-消费方包仅依赖接口包，从不依赖 `dsh-fs-local`。需要不同后端的部署只需为 `ctx.fs` 加载不同的提供方，无需改动工具 schema 或面向模型的提示词引导。
+Consumer 包仅依赖 Service Definition 包，从不依赖 `dsh-fs-local`。需要不同后端的部署只需为 `ctx.fs` 加载不同的提供方，无需改动工具 schema 或面向模型的提示词引导。
 
-读后写/编辑与观测状态策略是第四个包 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs-policy`（`packages/fs/fs-policy`），通过 `fs/*` 事件门控贡献，而非挂在 `ctx.fs` 上；加载 `dsh-tool-fs` 的部署同时加载 `dsh-fs-policy` 以获得读后写/编辑能力。本 Agent Note 确立了由三个包构成的 seam；策略从提供方基类拆出的决策由 [拆分文件系统 seam Agent Note](../simplification/2026-06-26-fsspec-style-fs-seam.md) 做出，其以事件门控插件（而非方法服务）实现的方式由 [事件门控 Agent Note](2026-06-26-file-context-as-event-gate.md) 做出。本文已更新为描述最终落地的四包形态。
+读后写/编辑与观测状态策略是第四个包 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs-policy`（`packages/fs/fs-policy`），通过 `fs/*` 事件门控贡献，而非挂在 `ctx.fs` 上；加载 `dsh-tool-fs` 的部署同时加载 `dsh-fs-policy` 以获得读后写/编辑能力。本决策确立了由三个包构成的边界；策略从提供方基类拆出的决策由 [拆分文件系统 seam Agent Note](../simplification/2026-06-26-fsspec-style-fs-seam.md) 做出，其以事件门控插件（而非方法服务）实现的方式由 [事件门控 Agent Note](2026-06-26-file-context-as-event-gate.md) 做出。
 
 第一个后端有意仅限本地：`dsh-fs-local` 基于宿主文件系统实现 `ctx.fs`。未来的兄弟后端可在同一接口之后提供沙箱、远程、虚拟或项目作用域的文件系统。
 
@@ -51,29 +51,30 @@ harness 已有一个具体的 `bash` 能力 seam（`dsh-bash` / `dsh-bash-local`
 
 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs-local` 依赖 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs` 和 `cordis`。它继承 `FileSystem`，将自身注册为 `ctx.fs`，拥有本地后端配置（如基目录），并包含所有直接的 `node:fs` / `node:path` 访问。它不持有观测状态存储——新鲜度是后端铸造、策略插件记录的版本令牌。
 
-`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-fs` 依赖 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs`、`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tools`、`@deepseek-ai/dsh-system-prompt` 和 `cordis`。它注册面向模型的工具和提示词段落。它禁止导入 `node:fs`、`node:path` 或 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs-local`；文件系统执行始终通过 `ctx.fs`。如果实现需要具体的 agent（智能体）或会话辅助类型，这些依赖属于 `tool-fs`；它们禁止回漏到 `dsh-fs` 中。
+`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-fs` 依赖 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs`、`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tools`、`@deepseek-ai/dsh-system-prompt` 和 `cordis`。它注册面向模型的工具和提示词段落。它禁止导入 `node:fs`、`node:path` 或 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs-local`；文件系统执行始终通过 `ctx.fs`。如果实现需要具体的 agent 或会话辅助类型，这些依赖属于 `tool-fs`；它们禁止回漏到 `dsh-fs` 中。
 
-根 `tool-fs` 插件通过组合各工具的注册辅助函数来注册完整的文件系统工具套件（`read`、`write` 和 `edit`）。它注入 `fs`，从不导入实现包。
+根 `tool-fs` 插件通过组合各工具的注册辅助函数来注册完整的文件系统工具套件（`read`、`write` 和 `edit`）。它注入 `fs`，从不导入 Service provider 包。
 
-## `ctx.fs` 契约
+## `ctx.fs` 约定
 
 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs` 拥有一个语义文件系统服务。它比 `readFile` / `writeFile` 更高层，这样 `tool-fs` 就不必重新实现路径解析、版本管理、文本解码、二进制拒绝、分页、原子替换、符号链接行为或字面编辑语义。
 
 该接口涵盖以下语义操作：
 
 - 将模型/插件提供的路径解析为后端定义的目标。
+- 将解析后的目标转换为同一执行环境的规范进程路径或 `file:` URI，并在不解析其不透明键的情况下检查包含关系。
 - 获取目标元数据而不读取文件内容。
-- 从目标读取有界的 UTF-8 文本页。
+- 读取完整或流式 UTF-8 文本；消费方执行各自的视图与保留上限。
 - 创建或替换一个 UTF-8 文本文件。
 - 通过字面替换编辑一个已有的 UTF-8 文本文件。
 
-提供方 seam 还携带策略所依赖的新鲜度钩子——但观测状态存储和 owner 推导位于 `dsh-fs-policy` 插件中，而非 `ctx.fs` 上：
+提供方约定还携带策略所依赖的新鲜度钩子——但观测状态存储和 owner 推导位于 `dsh-fs-policy` 插件中，而非 `ctx.fs` 上：
 
 - 后端为每个目标铸造一个不透明的 `version` 令牌（在 `stat` 以及每次读取/变更结果中）。
 - `writeText`/`editText` 接受一个可选的版本期望：省略它表示无条件的裸提供方变更；提供它则在后端的原子临界区内守护变更。
 - `dsh-fs-policy` 插件在 `fs/write-intent`/`fs/edit-intent` 上决定该期望，并在 `fs/observed` 上记录观测版本，以它从不透明事件 actor 推导出的 owner 为键（通常是 `exec.agent.session`）。
 
-授权基于版本新鲜度，而非完整/部分视图的区分：任何读取都会记录目标的版本，后续的写入/编辑只要文件仍处于该版本就被授权——因此对第 100-150 行的窗口化读取可以授权对第 120 行的编辑。观测状态存储是 `dsh-fs-policy` 内部的 `WeakMap<owner, Map<targetKey, version>>`；`dsh-fs` 不持有任何此类数据，并将 actor 视为不透明。（本 Agent Note 最初建模了一个带 `full`/`partial` 视图的 `FileState` 缓存放在 `ctx.fs` 上；拆分文件系统 seam 与事件门控两份 Agent Note 将其替换为此处描述的基于新鲜度的策略插件。）
+授权基于版本新鲜度，而非完整/部分视图的区分：任何读取都会记录目标的版本，后续的写入/编辑只要文件仍处于该版本就被授权——因此对第 100-150 行的窗口化读取可以授权对第 120 行的编辑。观测状态存储是 `dsh-fs-policy` 内部的 `WeakMap<owner, Map<targetKey, version>>`；`dsh-fs` 不持有任何此类数据，并将 actor 视为不透明。（本决策最初建模了一个带 `full`/`partial` 视图的 `FileState` 缓存放在 `ctx.fs` 上；拆分文件系统 seam 与事件门控两份笔记将其替换为此处描述的基于新鲜度的策略插件。）
 
 路径解析是显式的，允许异步。本地解析可能只做路径规范化，但沙箱/远程/项目作用域的后端可能需要 I/O 才能将用户提供的路径解析为稳定的目标标识。
 
@@ -83,19 +84,21 @@ harness 已有一个具体的 `bash` 能力 seam（`dsh-bash` / `dsh-bash-local`
 - 不透明的 `targetKey`，用于陈旧守护和文件状态查找。本地后端可能使用类似 realpath 的键；远程后端可能使用工作区 URI 或文件 id。消费方禁止解析或假设它是本地绝对路径。
 - `displayPath`，用于面向模型/UI 的输出。根据后端不同，它可能是本地绝对路径、工作区相对路径或远程 URI。
 
-读取和变更结果必须包含不透明的文件 `version`。本地后端从 bigint stat 元数据（`dev`、`ino`、`size`、`mtimeNs` 和 `ctimeNs`）派生令牌，因此同大小重写和 inode 替换都会可靠地使消费方持有的版本失效；远程后端可以使用 revision id 或类似 hash 的令牌。`dsh-fs-policy` 插件记录版本用于陈旧检查；消费方可以展示相关元数据但禁止解释版本令牌。
+即使另一项能力共享提供方的执行环境，`targetKey` 仍保持不透明。这类消费方通过提供方的 `processPath(target)`、`fileUrl(target)` 或 `contains(parent, child)` 获取所需事实；[可移植执行环境决策](2026-07-28-portable-execution-world-consumers.md)说明这些事实为何属于文件系统 seam。
 
-提供方返回已解码的文本：`readText` 返回整个常规文本文件，`streamText` 为大文件流式输出相同的文本语义。两者负责常规文件检查；有界的行/输出处理不是它们的职责——行窗口化、带行号渲染和总行数统计位于执行器（`dsh-tool-fs`）中，执行器通过 `ctx.fs` 读取并渲染面向模型的窗口。提供方负责 UTF-8 解码和二进制/NUL 拒绝；它不知道行窗口或视图。
+读取和变更结果必须包含不透明的文件 `version`。本地后端从 bigint stat 元数据（`dev`、`ino`、`size`、`mtimeNs` 和 `ctimeNs`）派生令牌，因此同大小重写和 inode 替换都会可靠地使消费方失效；远程后端可以使用 revision id 或类似 hash 的令牌。`dsh-fs-policy` 插件记录版本用于陈旧检查；消费方可以展示相关元数据但禁止解释版本令牌。
+
+提供方返回已解码的文本：`readText` 返回整个普通文本文件，`streamText` 为大文件或消费方自有的保留上限流式传输相同的文本语义。行窗口化、字节上限、带行号渲染和总行数统计归 `dsh-tool-fs`、`dsh-lsp-local` 等消费方所有。提供方负责普通文件检查、UTF-8 解码和二进制／NUL 拒绝；它不知道行窗口、协议上限或视图。
 
 观测状态记录不在 `ctx.fs` 上：成功读取后，执行器发出 `fs/observed`，`dsh-fs-policy` 插件为推导出的 owner 记录 `{ version }`。没有 `full`/`partial` 视图——任何窗口的读取都记录版本，新鲜度（而非视图完整性）授权后续的写入/编辑。
 
-全文件写入创建或替换 UTF-8 文本文件。后端在支持且有文档说明时可以创建父目录。已有的非常规目标被拒绝。`writeText` 接受一个可选期望：`createIfAbsent` 创建缺失的目标并拒绝已存在的（报 `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`，这是策略处理未观测 owner 时采用的分支）；`replaceIfVersion` 仅在目标处于观测版本时替换，否则报 `FS_STALE_VERSION`；省略期望则为无条件的裸提供方创建或覆盖。策略插件根据 owner 的观测状态选择提供哪个期望。
+全文件写入创建或替换 UTF-8 文本文件。后端在支持且有文档说明时可以创建父目录。已有的非常规目标被拒绝。`writeText` 接受一个可选期望：`createIfAbsent` 创建缺失的目标并拒绝已存在的（报 `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`，这是策略为未观测 owner 使用的路径）；`replaceIfVersion` 仅在目标处于观测版本时替换，否则报 `FS_STALE_VERSION`；省略期望则为无条件的裸提供方创建或覆盖。策略插件根据 owner 的观测状态选择提供哪个期望。
 
 字面编辑是提供方原语（`editText`），而非在 `tool-fs` 中由读取加写入组合而成。字面匹配、重复匹配拒绝、CRLF 保留、二进制拒绝、可选的陈旧版本检查和原子读-改-写必须一起留在后端的变更临界区内。`editText` 接受相同的可选版本期望；陈旧检查在字面匹配之前运行，因此基于旧读取的编辑会报 `FS_STALE_VERSION`。远程后端可以将编辑实现为原生的 compare-and-edit 操作；消费方不强制本地风格的组合。
 
 策略插件（而非 `ctx.fs`）对先前观测进行门控：`edit` 要求 owner 有先前观测（否则报 `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`），记录的版本作为 CAS 基础传给 `editText`。在策略插件缺席时，`ctx.fs` 本身是一个完整的无约束 seam（无条件写入/编辑）；工具从不与策略方法耦合。
 
-文件系统契约失败以 `FsError extends HarnessError` 抛出，工具注册表将其转换为带结构化 `{ name, code }` 元数据的 `isError` 工具结果。`dsh-fs` 拥有此词汇，而非由每个工具各自发明消息。错误码包括 `FS_NOT_FOUND`、`FS_NOT_TEXT`、`FS_STALE_VERSION`、`FS_NOT_OBSERVED`、`FS_NOT_REGULAR_FILE`、`FS_AMBIGUOUS_EDIT`、`FS_EDIT_NOT_FOUND` 和 `FS_ABORTED`。（早期草案包含 `FS_PARTIAL_OBSERVATION`；基于新鲜度的授权没有 partial/full 区分，因此已删除。目录列表相关的错误码后来由[为文件系统 seam 添加直接目录列举能力](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md)添加。）
+文件系统约定失败以 `FsError extends HarnessError` 抛出，工具注册表将其转换为带结构化 `{ name, code }` 元数据的 `isError` 工具结果。`dsh-fs` 拥有此词汇，而非由每个工具各自发明消息。错误码包括 `FS_NOT_FOUND`、`FS_NOT_TEXT`、`FS_STALE_VERSION`、`FS_NOT_OBSERVED`、`FS_NOT_REGULAR_FILE`、`FS_AMBIGUOUS_EDIT`、`FS_EDIT_NOT_FOUND` 和 `FS_ABORTED`。（早期草案包含 `FS_PARTIAL_OBSERVATION`；基于新鲜度的授权没有 partial/full 区分，因此已删除。目录列表相关的错误码后来由[为文件系统 seam 添加直接目录列举能力](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md)添加。）
 
 ## 工具消费方行为
 
@@ -116,7 +119,7 @@ harness 已有一个具体的 `bash` 能力 seam（`dsh-bash` / `dsh-bash-local`
 
 该包通过 `ctx.systemPrompt.section(...)` 注册提示词引导，通过 `ctx.tools.register(...)` 注册 schema。工具 schema 仍通过 `SystemPrompt.assemble()` 和 `ToolRegistry.schemas()` 流入正常的提示词组装路径；无需改动 agent loop（智能体循环）。
 
-工具包在后端变化时保持面向模型的契约稳定：本地后端和远程后端内部可能以不同方式解析路径，但 `read` / `write` / `edit` schema 不会仅因后端变化而改变。
+工具包在后端变化时保持面向模型的约定稳定：本地后端和远程后端内部可能以不同方式解析路径，但 `read` / `write` / `edit` schema 不会仅因后端变化而改变。
 
 默认部署要求在用 `write` 或 `edit` 更新已有文件之前先 `read`。`tool-fs` 不通过检查是否运行过名为 `read` 的工具来实现这一点：它分发 `fs/write-intent`/`fs/edit-intent` 事件（将执行上下文作为不透明 actor 传递），`dsh-fs-policy` 插件推导 owner、对先前观测进行门控并提供版本期望。任何窗口化读取都能授权后续的写入/编辑，只要文件未变。用 `write` 创建新文件不要求先前观测。
 
@@ -124,11 +127,11 @@ harness 已有一个具体的 `bash` 能力 seam（`dsh-bash` / `dsh-bash-local`
 
 ## 测试
 
-测试遵循包边界，而不仅是用户可见的工具：`dsh-fs` 中的服务 seam；`dsh-fs-local` 中通过 `ctx.fs` 接口测试的真实文件系统行为（解析、符号链接、流式输出、二进制/UTF-8 拒绝、无条件和版本守护的写入、字面编辑语义、行尾保留、结构化 `FsError` 错误码）；`dsh-tool-fs` 中基于真实本地提供方的消费方接口（只 mock 模型/时钟，从不 mock 协作者）；以及通过 `ctx.tools.execute()` 在有和没有 `dsh-fs-policy` 的情况下进行集成测试，通过从磁盘回读文件来验证世界状态，既不信任规范值，也不信任渲染内容。观测状态/owner 推导策略在 `dsh-fs-policy` 中测试，不在此处。
+测试遵循包边界，而不仅是用户可见的工具：`dsh-fs` 中的服务约定；`dsh-fs-local` 中通过 `ctx.fs` 接口测试的真实文件系统行为（解析、符号链接、流式传输、二进制/UTF-8 拒绝、无条件和版本守护的写入、字面编辑语义、行尾保留、结构化 `FsError` 错误码）；`dsh-tool-fs` 中基于真实本地提供方的消费方接口（只 mock 模型/时钟，从不 mock 协作者）；以及通过 `ctx.tools.execute()` 在有和没有 `dsh-fs-policy` 的情况下进行集成测试，通过从磁盘回读文件来验证世界状态，既不信任规范值，也不信任渲染内容。观测状态/owner 推导策略在 `dsh-fs-policy` 中测试，不在此处。
 
 本仓库曾踩过的防御性模式类别被直接固定：
 
-- **原子写入临时文件安全。** 写入/编辑通过目标旁边一个私有随机 `0700` 目录中独占且仅所有者可访问（`'wx'`、`0o600`）的临时文件暂存，失败时清理，最后原子 rename——与 bash spill 文件规则一致，因为可预测的全局可读临时路径会招致符号链接竞争和信息泄露。测试断言权限，并断言已存在的临时路径不会被覆盖；此原语是 seam 的常设要求。
+- **原子写入临时文件安全。** 写入/编辑通过目标旁边一个私有随机 `0700` 目录中的独占 owner-only（`'wx'`、`0o600`）临时文件暂存，失败时清理，最后原子 rename——与 bash 溢出文件规则一致，因为可预测的 world-readable 临时路径招致符号链接竞争和信息泄露。测试断言权限，并断言已存在的临时路径不会被覆盖；此原语是 seam 的常设要求。
 - **通过符号链接的 `targetKey` 同一性。** 两个输入路径解析到同一 realpath 时共享一个观测状态条目：通过路径 A 的 `read` 满足通过符号链接路径 B 的 `edit` 的读后编辑守护，通过一个路径的陈旧写入可通过另一个路径检测到。
 - **并发/陈旧竞争。** 对同一目标的两个并发写入/编辑操作确定性地收敛——一个成功，另一个被 `FS_STALE_VERSION` 拒绝——成功的编辑刷新记录状态，使同一 owner 的下一次编辑可以继续。
 - **HMR（热模块替换）安全与 dispose（资源释放）。** dispose 后端的 fiber 会撤回 `ctx.fs` 提供方；后续的提供方以无继承状态启动。
@@ -136,22 +139,22 @@ harness 已有一个具体的 `bash` 能力 seam（`dsh-bash` / `dsh-bash-local`
 ## 曾考虑的替代方案
 
 - **面向模型的工具直接基于 `node:fs`**：工具包将同时承担执行策略、路径解析、原子写入、文本解码和编辑语义，耦合问题部分所列的三个独立变化的关注点，且任何后端替换都会搅动 schema。
-- **单一合并包 `dsh-fs-tools`**：seam 之前的形态；以与 bash 相同的接口/实现/消费方拆分理由否决，且合并名称从未成为公开接口。
+- **单一合并包 `dsh-fs-tools`**：seam 之前的形态；以与 bash 相同的 Service Definition / Service provider / Consumer 拆分理由否决，且合并名称从未成为公开接口。
 - **观测状态放在 `ctx.fs` 上**：本 Agent Note 最初落地的形态；被 [拆分文件系统 seam Agent Note](../simplification/2026-06-26-fsspec-style-fs-seam.md) 和 [事件门控 Agent Note](2026-06-26-file-context-as-event-gate.md) 取代：沙箱/远程后端不应继承面向模型的观测策略，因此提供方只保留版本令牌和可选的版本守护变更。
 
 ## 后果
 
-**`cwd` 可能被误认为沙箱。** 本地后端的基目录是解析默认值，而非自动的隔离边界。如果需要隔离，必须由后端契约或 `tools/execute` 上的权限/沙箱插件强制执行。
+**`cwd` 可能被误认为沙箱。** 本地后端的基目录是解析默认值，而非自动的隔离边界。如果需要隔离，必须由后端约定或 `tools/execute` 上的权限/沙箱插件强制执行。
 
-**接口可能变得过于本地化。** 如果 `ctx.fs` 返回 `absolutePath` 之类的字段，远程、沙箱或虚拟后端会变得尴尬。契约应暴露显示元数据，而不要求消费方理解宿主路径。
+**接口可能变得过于本地化。** 如果 `ctx.fs` 返回 `absolutePath` 之类的字段，远程、沙箱或虚拟后端会变得尴尬。约定应暴露显示元数据，而不要求消费方理解宿主路径。
 
-**接口可能变得过于薄。** 如果 `ctx.fs` 只镜像 `node:fs` 原语，`tool-fs` 将重新实现二进制检测、分页、原子写入和编辑语义，重新制造本 Agent Note 试图避免的耦合。
+**接口可能变得过于薄。** 如果 `ctx.fs` 只镜像 `node:fs` 原语，`tool-fs` 将重新实现二进制检测、分页、原子写入和编辑语义，重新制造本决策所避免的耦合。
 
 **编辑语义天然易受竞争影响。** 字面编辑是读-改-写操作；守护手段是后端的原子变更临界区加上可选的版本期望，因此并发编辑确定性地收敛——一个赢，另一个得到 `FS_STALE_VERSION`。
 
-**观测状态不属于 `ctx.fs`。** 记录执行上下文看到了什么是工作流策略，而非原始文件系统 I/O。本 Agent Note 最初将其放在文件系统 seam 内部；拆分文件系统 seam Agent Note 随后确立了沙箱/远程后端不应继承面向模型的观测策略，并将其移入 `dsh-fs-policy` 插件。提供方 seam 只保留写入/编辑安全在存储层真正需要的东西——后端铸造的版本令牌和可选的版本守护变更——而策略插件拥有 owner 推导、观测状态和基于 `fs/*` 事件的读后编辑门控。
+**观测状态不属于 `ctx.fs`。** 记录执行上下文看到了什么是工作流策略，而非原始文件系统 I/O。本决策最初将其放在文件系统 seam 内部；拆分文件系统 seam 笔记随后确立了沙箱/远程后端不应继承面向模型的观测策略，并将其移入 `dsh-fs-policy` 插件。提供方约定只保留写入/编辑安全在存储层真正需要的东西——后端铸造的版本令牌和可选的版本守护变更——而策略插件拥有 owner 推导、观测状态和基于 `fs/*` 事件的读后编辑门控。
 
-**`resolve` 然后操作的形态每次调用多一次往返。** 每个工具可能先将路径解析为 `FsTarget`，再以单独的 `ctx.fs` 调用发起读取/写入/编辑。对本地后端来说这可以忽略（解析是内存中的路径规范化），但远程/沙箱后端可能将每步变成独立请求，使单次 `read` 变为两次网络往返。往返开销重要的后端可以在内部缓存或折叠解析，同时保持可观测契约不变。
+**`resolve` 然后操作的形态每次调用多一次往返。** 每个工具可能先将路径解析为 `FsTarget`，再以单独的 `ctx.fs` 调用发起读取/写入/编辑。对本地后端来说这可以忽略（解析是内存中的路径规范化），但远程/沙箱后端可能将每步变成独立请求，使单次 `read` 变为两次网络往返。往返开销重要的后端可以在内部缓存或折叠解析，同时保持可观测约定不变。
 
 **观测状态持久化被推迟。** 观测状态存在于内存中（`dsh-fs-policy` 内部的 `WeakMap`），因此恢复的会话保守地要求文件在写入/编辑前重新读取，直到未来的会话事件或持久化机制使观测可回放。
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-18-agent-lifecycle-and-ownership-seams.i18n.yaml → .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-18-agent-lifecycle-and-ownership-contracts.i18n.yaml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
-#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-18-agent-lifecycle-and-ownership-seams.md
-2026-06-18-agent-lifecycle-and-ownership-seams.md: 93247a6da7446a5a67db33423d2b766ce4cf3308
-2026-06-18-agent-lifecycle-and-ownership-seams.zh.md: 7c0f27e1e6ddeec91a8031ef7b1d9fd965a4463a
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-18-agent-lifecycle-and-ownership-contracts.md
+2026-06-18-agent-lifecycle-and-ownership-contracts.md: ad334d30afcaf1864a1ea3dd42f3c5b7d157603b
+2026-06-18-agent-lifecycle-and-ownership-contracts.zh.md: b9240969c9e952c1b38cbd4c088853005e156067

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-18-agent-lifecycle-and-ownership-seams.md → .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-18-agent-lifecycle-and-ownership-contracts.md

@@ -1,16 +1,16 @@
-# Agent Note: Agent lifecycle and ownership seams
+# Agent Note: Agent lifecycle and ownership contracts
 
 Status: implemented
 
-English | [中文](2026-06-18-agent-lifecycle-and-ownership-seams.zh.md)
+English | [中文](2026-06-18-agent-lifecycle-and-ownership-contracts.zh.md)
 
 ## Problem
 
-Several ACP and tool-bash limitations were symptoms of the same missing seam: plugins could create or resume agents through `ctx.agents`, but they could not own and dispose one agent independently, and long-running bash tasks carried no stable owner in the executor itself. ACP aborted and awaited agents on disconnect but could not unregister just that session's agent; `session/cancel` could not cancel queued-but-not-yet-started work; and `tool-bash` kept task ownership in a plugin-local `Map`, so an HMR reload could make an old task look unowned.
+Several ACP and tool-bash limitations were symptoms of the same missing ownership contract: plugins could create or resume agents through `ctx.agents`, but they could not own and dispose one agent independently, and long-running bash tasks carried no stable owner in the executor itself. ACP aborted and awaited agents on disconnect but could not unregister just that session's agent; `session/cancel` could not cancel queued-but-not-yet-started work; and `tool-bash` kept task ownership in a plugin-local `Map`, so an HMR reload could make an old task look unowned.
 
 ## Decision
 
-Three seams: the queue-aware cancel, the `AgentHandle` disposer, and the bash owner token.
+Three contract changes: the queue-aware cancel, the `AgentHandle` disposer, and the bash owner token.
 
 ### 1. Queue-aware `Agent.cancel(cause?)`
 
@@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ A new `cancel()` verb on the `Agent` interface — the single public stop primit
 
 **Teardown ORDER is load-bearing for durability**, and the implementation folds the session lifecycle into the agent's SINGLE composite cordis effect (`SessionStore.prepare`/`enter`/`announce`, replacing a sibling-effect split). A fiber unload disposes sibling effects concurrently (`Promise.all`), which would race removing the session store's append publication hooks against the loop's closing `session/flush` and drop the closing `turn/end`; inside one effect the disposers run as an ordered LIFO chain (loop stopped + `await agent.done` BEFORE the session detaches), so the loop's final flush is captured on BOTH the handle's `dispose()` and a fiber unload. The contained `agent/disposed` and `session/disposed` notifications cannot reject the chain or skip later teardown.
 
-### 3. Bash owner token in the seam
+### 3. Bash owner token in the Service Definition
 
-Background-task ownership moved from a `tool-bash` plugin-local `Map<string, Agent>` into the executor. `BashExecRequest` gains an optional `owner?: string`; the resolved `BashExecSpec` carries it as required-but-nullable `owner: string | undefined` (a forgotten owner is a visible `undefined`, never a silently-absent property). The executor stores the token on its task and exposes it via a new `BashExecutor.ownerOf(id): string | undefined` seam (NOT on the public `BashTask` — one read path, no redundant API). `tool-bash` deletes its `Map` entirely: it stamps `exec.agent?.id` (the shared registry/session id) as the owner at `start`, and `bash_output`/`bash_kill` compare `ctx.bash.ownerOf(id)` to the caller's token with `!== undefined` semantics (an empty-string token is still a real owner). The completion notice finds the live agent by scanning `ctx.get('agents')?.list()` for `agent.id === ownerToken` (read via `ctx.get` — `onTaskDone` runs on the bash fiber, a foreign fiber, where the `ctx.agents` proxy would throw). Because ownership now lives on the task in the executor (disposed with the `dsh-bash` fiber), it SURVIVES a `tool-bash` HMR reload — closing the old `XXX(tool-bash-owner-hmr)` gap. (The `onTaskDone` listener is still effect-scoped to `tool-bash`'s `apply`, so a completion landing during the reload gap still drops its one notice — the pre-existing reload-gap drop — but the ownership fence itself is HMR-proof.)
+Background-task ownership moved from a `tool-bash` plugin-local `Map<string, Agent>` into the executor. `BashExecRequest` gains an optional `owner?: string`; the resolved `BashExecSpec` carries it as required-but-nullable `owner: string | undefined` (a forgotten owner is a visible `undefined`, never a silently-absent property). The executor stores the token on its task and exposes it via a new `BashExecutor.ownerOf(id): string | undefined` method (NOT on the public `BashTask` — one read path, no redundant API). `tool-bash` deletes its `Map` entirely: it stamps `exec.agent?.id` (the shared registry/session id) as the owner at `start`, and `bash_output`/`bash_kill` compare `ctx.bash.ownerOf(id)` to the caller's token with `!== undefined` semantics (an empty-string token is still a real owner). The completion notice finds the live agent by scanning `ctx.get('agents')?.list()` for `agent.id === ownerToken` (read via `ctx.get` — `onTaskDone` runs on the bash fiber, a foreign fiber, where the `ctx.agents` proxy would throw). Because ownership now lives on the task in the executor (disposed with the `dsh-bash` fiber), it SURVIVES a `tool-bash` HMR reload — closing the old `XXX(tool-bash-owner-hmr)` gap. (The `onTaskDone` listener is still effect-scoped to `tool-bash`'s `apply`, so a completion landing during the reload gap still drops its one notice — the pre-existing reload-gap drop — but the ownership fence itself is HMR-proof.)
 
 ## Verification
 
@@ -37,11 +37,11 @@ These invariants hold and are pinned by tests:
 
 ## Session owner tokens are unique among live agents
 
-The bash owner-token comparison relies on the shared `Agent.id`/`SessionId` being unique among live agents. Concurrent same-ID operations may both prepare privately, but publication enters the session and agent in order; `SessionStore.enter()` rejects a duplicate live session id, and every losing transaction rolls its private state back. A programmatic caller therefore cannot publish two live agents with one session token. The access *policy* (token comparison) stays in `tool-bash` (the consumer); the bash seam stores only an opaque `owner` string and never interprets it — the correct interface/implementation/consumer split.
+The bash owner-token comparison relies on the shared `Agent.id`/`SessionId` being unique among live agents. Concurrent same-ID operations may both prepare privately, but publication enters the session and agent in order; `SessionStore.enter()` rejects a duplicate live session id, and every losing transaction rolls its private state back. A programmatic caller therefore cannot publish two live agents with one session token. The access *policy* (token comparison) stays in `tool-bash` (the Consumer); the bash capability keeps `owner` opaque and never interprets it — the correct Service Definition / Service provider / Consumer split.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
-- **A public `BashTask.owner` field** instead of the `BashExecutor.ownerOf(id)` seam — rejected: one read path, no redundant API.
+- **A public `BashTask.owner` field** instead of the `BashExecutor.ownerOf(id)` Service Definition method — rejected: one read path, no redundant API.
 - **Sibling cordis effects for the agent's session lifecycle** — rejected: a fiber unload disposes sibling effects concurrently (`Promise.all`), racing removal of the store-owned append publication hooks against the loop's closing `session/flush`; the single composite effect's ordered LIFO chain is what captures the closing `turn/end` on both disposal paths.
 - **A separate step-only `abort()` beside `cancel()`** — shipped originally, then removed as unused; `cancel()` is the single public stop primitive ([the public-stop-surface Agent Note](../simplification/2026-06-20-public-agent-stop-surface.md)).
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-18-agent-lifecycle-and-ownership-seams.zh.md → .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-18-agent-lifecycle-and-ownership-contracts.zh.md

@@ -1,20 +1,20 @@
-# Agent Note: Agent 生命周期与所有权 seam
+# Agent Note: Agent 生命周期与所有权约定
 
 Status: implemented
 
-[English](2026-06-18-agent-lifecycle-and-ownership-seams.md) | 中文
+[English](2026-06-18-agent-lifecycle-and-ownership-contracts.md) | 中文
 
 ## 问题
 
-ACP（Agent Client Protocol）与 tool-bash 的若干限制是同一个缺失 seam 的症状：插件可以通过 `ctx.agents` 创建或恢复 agent（智能体），但无法独立拥有和 dispose（资源释放）单个 agent，而长时间运行的 bash 任务在执行器中也没有稳定的所有者。ACP 在断连时中止并等待 agent，却无法仅注销该会话的 agent；`session/cancel` 无法取消已入队但尚未开始的工作；`tool-bash` 将任务所有权保存在插件本地的 `Map` 中，因此一次 HMR（热模块替换）重载就可能让旧任务看起来无主。
+ACP（Agent Client Protocol）与 tool-bash 的若干限制是同一个所有权约定缺失的症状：插件可以通过 `ctx.agents` 创建或恢复 agent（智能体），但无法独立拥有和 dispose（资源释放）单个 agent，而长时间运行的 bash 任务在执行器中也没有稳定的所有者。ACP 在断连时中止并等待 agent，却无法仅注销该会话的 agent；`session/cancel` 无法取消已入队但尚未开始的工作；`tool-bash` 将任务所有权保存在插件本地的 `Map` 中，因此一次 HMR（热模块替换）重载就可能让旧任务看起来无主。
 
 ## 决策
 
-三个 seam：队列感知的取消、`AgentHandle` 释放器，以及 bash 所有者令牌。
+三项约定变更：队列感知的取消、`AgentHandle` 释放器，以及 bash 所有者令牌。
 
 ### 1. 队列感知的 `Agent.cancel(cause?)`
 
-`Agent` 接口新增 `cancel()` 动词——唯一的公开停止原语。（它最初与范围更窄、仅作用于步骤的 `abort()` 一同交付；后者后来因无人使用而移除，使 `cancel()` 成为唯一公开的停止工作方式。）它清空 inbox 的 queued + steering FIFO，在存在活跃轮次时中止它，并保留一个不带 cause 的 pre-run 标记，使在被领取前被取消的提示词永不运行，而后来的提示词仍保持独立。有效调用会在清空或中止前发出 `agent/cancel-requested`，携带类型化的 `user | parent` cause；空闲取消不发出任何事件，也不会使下一条提示词搁浅。`whenIdle()` 会在取消后达到完全停稳，ACP 的 `session/cancel` 映射到 `user`。[显式轮次取消决策](2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.md)规定了当前的 cause、signal 生命周期与协作式结算契约。
+`Agent` 接口新增 `cancel()` 动词——唯一的公开停止原语。（它最初与范围更窄、仅作用于步骤的 `abort()` 一同交付；后者后来因无人使用而移除，使 `cancel()` 成为唯一公开的停止工作方式。）它清空 inbox 的 queued + steering FIFO，在存在活跃轮次时中止它，并保留一个不带 cause 的 pre-run 标记，使在被领取前被取消的提示词永不运行，而后来的提示词仍保持独立。有效调用会在清空或中止前发出 `agent/cancel-requested`，携带类型化的 `user | parent` cause；空闲取消不发出任何事件，也不会使下一条提示词搁浅。`whenIdle()` 会在取消后达到完全停稳，ACP 的 `session/cancel` 映射到 `user`。[显式轮次取消决策](2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.md)规定了当前的 cause、signal 生命周期与协作式结算约定。
 
 ### 2. `AgentHandle` 异步释放器
 
@@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ ACP（Agent Client Protocol）与 tool-bash 的若干限制是同一个缺失 se
 
 **拆除顺序对持久性至关重要**，实现将会话生命周期折叠进 agent 的单个复合 Cordis effect（`SessionStore.prepare`/`enter`/`announce`，取代兄弟 effect 拆分）。fiber 卸载会并发释放兄弟 effect（`Promise.all`），这会让会话存储的 append 发布钩子移除与循环关闭时的 `session/flush` 竞争，从而丢失关闭的 `turn/end`；在一个 effect 内，释放器作为有序的 LIFO 链运行（停止循环 + `await agent.done` 在会话分离之前），因此无论 handle 的 `dispose()` 还是 fiber 卸载，都会捕获循环的最终刷写。被隔离的 `agent/disposed` 和 `session/disposed` 通知无法拒绝该链或跳过后续拆除。
 
-### 3. Bash seam 中的所有者令牌
+### 3. Service Definition 中的 Bash 所有者令牌
 
-后台任务所有权从 `tool-bash` 插件本地的 `Map<string, Agent>` 移入执行器。`BashExecRequest` 新增可选的 `owner?: string`；解析后的 `BashExecSpec` 将其作为必需但可空的 `owner: string | undefined` 携带（被遗忘的 owner 是可见的 `undefined`，而非静默缺失的属性）。执行器把 token 存在任务上，并通过新的 `BashExecutor.ownerOf(id): string | undefined` seam 暴露它（不放在公开的 `BashTask` 上——只有一条读取路径，没有冗余 API）。`tool-bash` 完全删除其 `Map`：它在 `start` 时将 `exec.agent?.id`（共享的注册表/会话 id）盖章为 owner，`bash_output`/`bash_kill` 则以 `!== undefined` 语义把 `ctx.bash.ownerOf(id)` 与调用方 token 比较（空字符串 token 仍是真实 owner）。完成通知通过扫描 `ctx.get('agents')?.list()` 查找 `agent.id === ownerToken` 的存活 agent（经 `ctx.get` 读取——`onTaskDone` 运行在 bash fiber 这一外部 fiber 上，直接使用 `ctx.agents` proxy 会抛异常）。由于所有权现在保存在执行器的任务上（随 `dsh-bash` fiber dispose），它能跨越 `tool-bash` HMR 重载，关闭旧的 `XXX(tool-bash-owner-hmr)` 缺口。（`onTaskDone` 监听器仍受 `tool-bash` 的 `apply` effect 约束，因此落在重载间隙的完成仍会丢失一条通知——既有的重载间隙丢失——但所有权隔离本身已经不受 HMR 影响。）
+后台任务所有权从 `tool-bash` 插件本地的 `Map<string, Agent>` 移入执行器。`BashExecRequest` 新增可选的 `owner?: string`；解析后的 `BashExecSpec` 将其作为必需但可空的 `owner: string | undefined` 携带（被遗忘的 owner 是可见的 `undefined`，而非静默缺失的属性）。执行器把 token 存在任务上，并通过新的 `BashExecutor.ownerOf(id): string | undefined` 方法暴露它（不放在公开的 `BashTask` 上——只有一条读取路径，没有冗余 API）。`tool-bash` 完全删除其 `Map`：它在 `start` 时将 `exec.agent?.id`（共享的注册表/会话 id）盖章为 owner，`bash_output`/`bash_kill` 则以 `!== undefined` 语义把 `ctx.bash.ownerOf(id)` 与调用方 token 比较（空字符串 token 仍是真实 owner）。完成通知通过扫描 `ctx.get('agents')?.list()` 查找 `agent.id === ownerToken` 的存活 agent（经 `ctx.get` 读取——`onTaskDone` 运行在 bash fiber 这一外部 fiber 上，直接使用 `ctx.agents` proxy 会抛异常）。由于所有权现在保存在执行器的任务上（随 `dsh-bash` fiber dispose），它能跨越 `tool-bash` HMR 重载，关闭旧的 `XXX(tool-bash-owner-hmr)` 缺口。（`onTaskDone` 监听器仍受 `tool-bash` 的 `apply` effect 约束，因此落在重载间隙的完成仍会丢失一条通知——既有的重载间隙丢失——但所有权隔离本身已经不受 HMR 影响。）
 
 ## 验证
 
@@ -37,11 +37,11 @@ ACP（Agent Client Protocol）与 tool-bash 的若干限制是同一个缺失 se
 
 ## 会话所有者令牌在存活 agent 中唯一
 
-bash 所有者 token 比较依赖共享的 `Agent.id`/`SessionId` 在存活 agent 中唯一。并发的同 ID 操作可以都私下准备，但发布时会依次登记会话和 agent；`SessionStore.enter()` 拒绝重复的存活会话 id，每个失败事务都回滚自己的私有状态。因此程序化调用方无法发布两个共享同一会话 token 的存活 agent。访问*策略*（token 比较）留在消费方 `tool-bash`；bash seam 只存储不透明的 `owner` 字符串且从不解释它——这是正确的接口/实现/消费方拆分。
+bash 所有者 token 比较依赖共享的 `Agent.id`/`SessionId` 在存活 agent 中唯一。并发的同 ID 操作可以都私下准备，但发布时会依次登记会话和 agent；`SessionStore.enter()` 拒绝重复的存活会话 id，每个失败事务都回滚自己的私有状态。因此程序化调用方无法发布两个共享同一会话 token 的存活 agent。访问*策略*（token 比较）留在 Consumer `tool-bash`；bash 能力只存储不透明的 `owner` 字符串且从不解释它——这是正确的 Service Definition / Service provider / Consumer 拆分。
 
 ## 曾考虑的替代方案
 
-- **公开的 `BashTask.owner` 字段**而非 `BashExecutor.ownerOf(id)` seam：否决。一条读取路径即可，无需冗余 API。
+- **公开的 `BashTask.owner` 字段**而非 `BashExecutor.ownerOf(id)` Service Definition 方法：否决。一条读取路径即可，无需冗余 API。
 - **为 agent 的会话生命周期使用兄弟 Cordis effect**：否决。fiber 卸载时并发释放兄弟 effect（`Promise.all`），store 拥有的 append 发布钩子的移除与循环的关闭 `session/flush` 产生竞争；单一复合 effect 的有序 LIFO 链才能在两条释放路径上都捕获关闭的 `turn/end`。
 - **在 `cancel()` 之外另设一个仅中止步骤的 `abort()`**：最初发布过，后因无人使用而移除；`cancel()` 是唯一的公开停止原语（见[公开停止接口 Agent Note](../simplification/2026-06-20-public-agent-stop-surface.md)）。
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-18-session-surface.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-18-session-surface.md
-2026-06-18-session-surface.md: eeac53534c70099e4102aff9ef226702ea939654
-2026-06-18-session-surface.zh.md: c58d3da049cd6c18e564e596354f5d1831c4756f
+2026-06-18-session-surface.md: fd48a4ee4e177b84a235b044b054e4ac266df8ba
+2026-06-18-session-surface.zh.md: 86f9c5fdd5d711fb81e03e95329d316bfef29227

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-18-session-surface.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-06-18-session-surface.zh.md)
 
 ## Problem
 
-The event log is authoritative, but history manipulation had no durable shared mechanism. Plugins such as compaction would otherwise rewrite derived requests through order-sensitive listeners, leave no provenance, and require repeated changes to `deriveMessages()`.
+The event log is authoritative, but history manipulation had no durable shared mechanism. Without one, plugins such as compaction would rewrite derived requests through order-sensitive listeners without recording which events each replacement used. Every new history manipulation would also require changes to `deriveMessages()`.
 
 ## Decision
 
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Add a **surface** — a derived, cached order of event sequences (the subset of
 
 Every `SessionEvent` gains two optional fields (structural metadata, like `seq`/`time`):
 
-- **`sourceEventSeqs?: number[]`** — seq numbers of events that are provenance sources (e.g., the `assistant/chunk` seqs that built an `assistant/message`, or the surface nodes shadowed by a compaction marker). A present `[]` is valid only on `assistant/message` and records a known empty provider stream; omission there means legacy or otherwise unrecorded provenance. Other surface events require a non-empty list when the field is present. Provenance is a core design principle; without it, the replace-range operation cannot be validated on replay.
+- **`sourceEventSeqs?: number[]`** — seq numbers of earlier events cited as sources (e.g., the `assistant/chunk` seqs that built an `assistant/message`, or the surface nodes shadowed by a compaction marker). A present `[]` is valid only on `assistant/message` and records a known empty provider stream; when the field is absent, a legacy or foreign event does not record which earlier events produced the message. Other surface events require a non-empty list when the field is present. Without these cited seqs, replay cannot validate that a replace-range operation names every event it removed.
 - **`surfaceOp?: SurfaceOp`** — how this event entered the surface. Absent for non-surface events.
 
 ### SurfaceOp: two operations
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ The `repair.ts` module synthesizes `tool/result` closers for orphaned tool calls
 
 ### Invariants
 
-`Session` validates `sourceEventSeqs` and `surfaceOp` at the always-on seed/append boundary: only `assistant/message` may use an empty provenance list; references are unique, earlier, and known; replacement endpoints exist in surface order; and provenance covers every shadowed node. These are single-record acceptance and storage-projection rules, not optional invariant-service contributions.
+`Session` validates `sourceEventSeqs` and `surfaceOp` at the always-on seed/append boundary: only `assistant/message` may use an empty source-event list; references are unique, earlier, and known; replacement endpoints exist in surface order; and `sourceEventSeqs` covers every shadowed node. These are single-record acceptance and storage-projection rules, not optional invariant-service contributions.
 
 Every surface-eligible event must carry `surfaceOp` or it would disappear from derived history. Typed `append` overloads enforce this for literal event types; runtime checks in `append` and the seed constructor cover widened unions and loaded logs. Invalid seeds are rejected rather than upgraded under the pre-release format policy.
 
@@ -63,11 +63,11 @@ Every surface-eligible event must carry `surfaceOp` or it would disappear from d
 ## Consequences
 
 - **`packages/core/session`**: `surface.ts` (`SurfaceManager`) maintains one ordered seq array for candidate acceptance and live projection; `SessionSurface` is its readonly public view. `SurfaceOp`/`SurfaceIntent` and the top-level session-event fields record how entries join it. `append()` requires a `SurfaceIntent` for surface events, `deriveMessages()` walks the surface as the sole derivation path, and `repair.ts` emits surface-aware closers. The seed constructor rejects a surface-eligible seed event missing its `surfaceOp` marker (see § Invariants).
-- **`packages/core/agent-loop`**: All surface-capable appends pass surface opts. Chunk seqs are collected for `assistant/message` provenance; `tool/call` seqs are captured for `tool/result` provenance.
-- **`packages/session-persistence/session-persistence-sqlite`**: Two new nullable TEXT columns (`source_event_seqs`, `surface_op`) on the `events` table; `SCHEMA_VERSION` bumped (bump-and-reject, no migration).
-- **`packages/session-persistence/session-persistence-jsonl`**: No changes required.
-- **`packages/session-persistence/session-persistence`**: Abstract interface unchanged.
+- **`packages/core/agent-loop`**: All surface-capable appends pass surface opts. Each `assistant/message` cites its chunk seqs; each `tool/result` cites its `tool/call` seq.
+- **`packages/session/session-persistence-sqlite`**: Two new nullable TEXT columns (`source_event_seqs`, `surface_op`) on the `events` table; `SCHEMA_VERSION` bumped (bump-and-reject, no migration).
+- **`packages/session/session-persistence-jsonl`**: No changes required.
+- **`packages/session/session-persistence`**: Abstract interface unchanged.
 
-The surface is the foundation for future history manipulation. A compaction or tool-result-prune plugin appends one of the existing message-producing event types (a `user/message` carrying the summary, say) with `surfaceOp: { op: 'replace', start, end }` and `sourceEventSeqs` covering the shadowed entries — the new event takes the range's place on the surface while the plugin's own trace events (e.g. `compaction/start`, `compaction/end`) stay off it. Replay preserves the decision deterministically.
+The surface is the foundation history manipulation ships on — dsh-compact's compaction rides it. A compaction or tool-result-prune plugin appends one of the existing message-producing event types (a `user/message` carrying the summary, say) with `surfaceOp: { op: 'replace', start, end }` and `sourceEventSeqs` covering the shadowed entries — the new event takes the range's place on the surface while the plugin's own trace events (e.g. `compaction/start`, `compaction/end`) stay off it. Replay preserves the decision deterministically.
 
-A `tool/result` replacement may rewrite exactly one current `tool/result` and must preserve every data field except `content`. Session acceptance enforces this rule together with positional range and provenance validation, independent of optional diagnostic plugins.
+A `tool/result` replacement may rewrite exactly one current `tool/result` and must preserve every data field except `content`. Session acceptance enforces this rule together with positional range and cited source-event validation, independent of optional diagnostic plugins.

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-18-session-surface.zh.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 问题
 
-事件日志是权威数据源，但历史操纵此前没有持久化的共享机制。如果没有这样的机制，上下文压缩（context compaction）等插件只能通过顺序敏感的监听器改写派生请求，不留溯源信息，且每次新增操纵都要反复修改 `deriveMessages()`。
+事件日志是权威数据源，但历史操纵此前没有持久化的共享机制。如果没有这样的机制，上下文压缩（context compaction）等插件会通过顺序敏感的监听器改写派生请求，却不记录每次替换使用了哪些事件。每次新增历史操纵时，还必须修改 `deriveMessages()`。
 
 ## 决策
 
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 每个 `SessionEvent` 获得两个可选字段（结构性元数据，与 `seq`/`time` 同级）：
 
-- **`sourceEventSeqs?: number[]`**：作为溯源来源的事件 seq 编号（例如构成 `assistant/message` 的各 `assistant/chunk` 的 seq，或被压缩标记遮蔽的 surface 节点）。出现的 `[]` 只在 `assistant/message` 上有效，表示已知为空的提供方流；在该事件上省略字段表示旧数据或未记录的溯源。其他 surface 事件一旦出现此字段，就必须是非空列表。溯源是核心设计原则；没有它，replace-range 操作在回放时无法被验证。
+- **`sourceEventSeqs?: number[]`**：被引用为数据来源的早期事件 seq 编号（例如构成 `assistant/message` 的各 `assistant/chunk` 的 seq，或被压缩标记遮蔽的 surface 节点）。出现的 `[]` 只在 `assistant/message` 上有效，表示已知为空的提供方流；旧格式或外部事件缺少该字段时，没有记录这条消息由哪些早期事件产生。其他 surface 事件一旦出现此字段，就必须是非空列表。如果没有这些引用的 seq，回放就无法验证 replace-range 操作是否列出了它移除的每个事件。
 - **`surfaceOp?: SurfaceOp`**：该事件如何进入 surface。非 surface 事件不携带此字段。
 
 ### SurfaceOp：两种操作
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ export type SurfaceOp =
 
 ### SurfaceManager：基于增量，而非全量重建
 
-一个 `Session` 拥有一个 `SurfaceManager`，后者维护事件 seq 的有序 `number[]`。管理器会在提交前校验每个种子或追加候选项而不应用它，然后只处理上次同步之后已经提交的事件，而不重新扫描整个日志。`Session.surface` 通过只读的 `SessionSurface` 契约暴露同一个管理器，因此接纳、派生历史、压缩与工作区上下文共享同一份增量状态。Replace 按数组位置定位两个端点（均包含在范围内），并把替换 seq splice 到该范围；不会用第二个管理器、链接对象或 seq 到节点的 map 来重复表达顺序。
+一个 `Session` 拥有一个 `SurfaceManager`，后者维护事件 seq 的有序 `number[]`。管理器会在提交前校验每个种子或追加候选项而不应用它，然后只处理上次同步之后已经提交的事件，而不重新扫描整个日志。`Session.surface` 通过只读的 `SessionSurface` 约定暴露同一个管理器，因此接纳、派生历史、压缩与工作区上下文共享同一份增量状态。Replace 按数组位置定位两个端点（均包含在范围内），并把替换 seq splice 到该范围；不会用第二个管理器、链接对象或 seq 到节点的 map 来重复表达顺序。
 
 无新事件时增量处理为 O(1)，有新事件到达时为 O(新事件数)。
 
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ export type SurfaceOp =
 
 ### 不变式
 
-`Session` 在始终启用的 seed/append 边界校验 `sourceEventSeqs` 与 `surfaceOp`：只有 `assistant/message` 可以使用空的溯源列表；引用必须唯一、更早且已知；替换端点必须存在于 surface 顺序中；溯源必须覆盖每个被遮蔽的节点。这些是单记录接纳与存储投影规则，不是由可选的不变式服务提供的规则。
+`Session` 在始终启用的 seed/append 边界校验 `sourceEventSeqs` 与 `surfaceOp`：只有 `assistant/message` 可以使用空的源事件列表；引用必须唯一、更早且已知；替换端点必须存在于 surface 顺序中；`sourceEventSeqs` 必须覆盖每个被遮蔽的节点。这些是单记录接纳与存储投影规则，不是由可选的不变式服务提供的规则。
 
 每个可进入 surface 的事件都必须携带 `surfaceOp`，否则它将从派生历史中消失。类型化的 `append` 重载对字面事件类型强制执行此规则；`append` 和种子构造函数中的运行时检查覆盖宽化联合类型和加载的日志。按照预发布格式策略，无效的种子被拒绝而非升级。
 
@@ -63,11 +63,11 @@ export type SurfaceOp =
 ## 后果
 
 - **`packages/core/session`**：`surface.ts`（`SurfaceManager`）维护一个用于候选接纳和实时投影的有序 seq 数组；`SessionSurface` 是其只读公共视图。`SurfaceOp`/`SurfaceIntent` 与顶层会话事件字段记录条目如何加入它。`append()` 要求 surface 事件携带 `SurfaceIntent`，`deriveMessages()` 以遍历 surface 作为唯一派生路径，`repair.ts` 则发出 surface 感知的闭合事件。种子构造函数拒绝缺少 `surfaceOp` 标记的可进入 surface 的种子事件（见「不变式」一节）。
-- **`packages/core/agent-loop`**：所有涉及 surface 事件的追加操作都传入 surface 选项。收集分片 seq 用于 `assistant/message` 溯源；捕获 `tool/call` seq 用于 `tool/result` 溯源。
-- **`packages/session-persistence/session-persistence-sqlite`**：`events` 表新增两个可空 TEXT 列（`source_event_seqs`、`surface_op`）；`SCHEMA_VERSION` 递增（bump-and-reject，无迁移）。
-- **`packages/session-persistence/session-persistence-jsonl`**：无需改动。
-- **`packages/session-persistence/session-persistence`**：抽象接口不变。
+- **`packages/core/agent-loop`**：所有涉及 surface 事件的追加操作都传入 surface 选项。每个 `assistant/message` 都引用产生它的分片 seq；每个 `tool/result` 都引用它的 `tool/call` seq。
+- **`packages/session/session-persistence-sqlite`**：`events` 表新增两个可空 TEXT 列（`source_event_seqs`、`surface_op`）；`SCHEMA_VERSION` 递增（bump-and-reject，无迁移）。
+- **`packages/session/session-persistence-jsonl`**：无需改动。
+- **`packages/session/session-persistence`**：抽象接口不变。
 
-Surface 是未来历史操纵的基础。压缩或 tool-result-prune 插件追加一个既有的消息产出事件类型（例如一条携带摘要的 `user/message`），附带 `surfaceOp: { op: 'replace', start, end }` 和覆盖被遮蔽条目的 `sourceEventSeqs`——新事件在 surface 上取代该范围的位置，而插件自身的 trace 事件（如 `compaction/start`、`compaction/end`）不进入 surface。回放以确定性方式保留该决策。
+Surface 是历史操纵赖以落地的基础——dsh-compact 的压缩就搭载于其上。压缩或 tool-result-prune 插件追加一个既有的消息产出事件类型（例如一条携带摘要的 `user/message`），附带 `surfaceOp: { op: 'replace', start, end }` 和覆盖被遮蔽条目的 `sourceEventSeqs`——新事件在 surface 上取代该范围的位置，而插件自身的 trace 事件（如 `compaction/start`、`compaction/end`）不进入 surface。回放以确定性方式保留该决策。
 
-一次 `tool/result` 替换只能改写当前的一个 `tool/result`，并且必须保留除 `content` 以外的每个数据字段。Session 接纳会与位置范围和溯源校验一起强制这条规则，不依赖可选的诊断插件。
+一次 `tool/result` 替换只能改写当前的一个 `tool/result`，并且必须保留除 `content` 以外的每个数据字段。Session 接纳会与位置范围和引用的源事件校验一起强制这条规则，不依赖可选的诊断插件。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.md
-2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.md: 12131ebf8380fb8ba816618f0cbaf72cb004623a
-2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.zh.md: a11926b602651d8a7dc641f61371e882685b508b
+2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.md: c376bb4a209a250d33274dfd60531475354ba363
+2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.zh.md: 06a2dafc4d14c29bb7758fdc67d3f0f8136983e2

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.md

@@ -6,13 +6,13 @@ English | [中文](2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.zh.md)
 
 ## Problem
 
-`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl` and `dsh-session-persistence-sqlite` intentionally prove the same `SessionPersistence` contract over different storage media, but their write-path orchestration was duplicated: per-session state, `session/created` adoption, backend-specific prefix reads, write-behind control, per-id operation serialization, HMR seeding, and dispose drains. The pure seed-prefix collision and serializability guards had already moved into the seam package; the remaining orchestration was still correctness-heavy and received the same fixes twice. Only the storage primitives (write bytes vs. INSERT rows) differed.
+`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl` and `dsh-session-persistence-sqlite` intentionally prove the same `SessionPersistence` contract over different storage media, but their write-path orchestration was duplicated: per-session state, `session/created` adoption, backend-specific prefix reads, write-behind control, per-id operation serialization, HMR seeding, and dispose drains. The pure seed-prefix collision and serializability guards had already moved into the Service Definition package; the remaining orchestration was still correctness-heavy and received the same fixes twice. Only the storage primitives (write bytes vs. INSERT rows) differed.
 
 ## Decision
 
 Extract a backend-agnostic `PersistenceCoordinator` into `dsh-session-persistence`. The coordinator owns the orchestration once; each first-party backend composes one (`new PersistenceCoordinator(ctx, this)`), implements a small `PersistenceBackend` hook interface, and delegates its stateful public methods (`create`/`append`/`prepare`/`load`/`inspect`/`readFrom`) to it. Backend-owned metadata and revision listing bypass the coordinator.
 
-Composition, not inheritance. The coordinator is a concrete class the backend holds, not a base class the backend extends. The Agent Note's risk — "a coordinator must not make unusual backends fight an inheritance hierarchy" — is avoided: a backend exposes only the hooks and cannot reach the coordinator's private orchestration state. A third-party backend MAY still implement the abstract service directly without the coordinator, including immutable logical inspection and the default preparation fallback through `load`.
+Composition, not inheritance. The coordinator is a concrete class the backend holds, not a base class the backend extends. The risk that a coordinator makes unusual backends fight an inheritance hierarchy is avoided: a backend exposes only the hooks and cannot reach the coordinator's private orchestration state. A third-party backend MAY still implement the abstract service directly without the coordinator, including immutable logical inspection and the default preparation fallback through `load`.
 
 The coordinator holds one lifecycle entry for each exact live `Session`: initialization plus a package-private write controller that owns pending events, a fixed batching deadline, the active write, failure retention, and the shared flush barrier. Each `session/event` enters that bounded write path, and `session/flush` bypasses the wait to observe quiescence. The [flush-controller simplification](../simplification/2026-07-23-collapse-persistence-flush-state.md) owns controller consolidation; the [bounded batching decision](2026-08-08-bounded-session-persistence-write-batching.md) owns scheduling cadence.
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.zh.md

@@ -6,13 +6,13 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 问题
 
-`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl` 与 `dsh-session-persistence-sqlite` 有意在不同存储介质上证明同一份 `SessionPersistence` 契约，但它们重复实现了写入路径编排：每会话状态、`session/created` 接管、后端特定的前缀读取、write-behind 控制、按 id 串行执行操作、HMR（热模块替换）种子注入与 dispose（资源释放）排空。纯粹的种子前缀碰撞检查与可序列化守卫已迁入 seam 包；剩余的编排仍然对正确性要求很高，且同样的修复被应用了两次。唯一的差异在于存储原语（写字节 vs. INSERT 行）。
+`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl` 与 `dsh-session-persistence-sqlite` 有意在不同存储介质上证明同一份 `SessionPersistence` 约定，但它们重复实现了写入路径编排：每会话状态、`session/created` 接管、后端特定的前缀读取、write-behind 控制、按 id 串行执行操作、HMR（热模块替换）种子注入与 dispose（资源释放）排空。纯粹的种子前缀碰撞检查与可序列化守卫已迁入 Service Definition 包；剩余的编排仍然对正确性要求很高，且同样的修复被应用了两次。唯一的差异在于存储原语（写字节 vs. INSERT 行）。
 
 ## 决策
 
 将一个后端无关的 `PersistenceCoordinator` 提取到 `dsh-session-persistence` 中。协调器统一拥有编排逻辑；每个第一方后端组合一个协调器实例（`new PersistenceCoordinator(ctx, this)`），实现一个小型 `PersistenceBackend` 钩子接口，并将其有状态的公开方法（`create`/`append`/`prepare`/`load`/`inspect`/`readFrom`）委托给协调器。由后端拥有的元数据与修订版本列举会绕过协调器。
 
-组合，而非继承。协调器是后端持有的具体类，不是后端继承的基类。本 Agent Note 的风险——「协调器不得让非常规后端与继承层级作斗争」——由此规避：后端只暴露钩子，无法触及协调器的私有编排状态。第三方后端仍然可以完全不使用协调器、直接实现抽象服务，包括不可变逻辑检查，以及通过 `load` 实现的默认准备回退。
+组合，而非继承。协调器是后端持有的具体类，不是后端继承的基类。协调器让非常规后端与继承层级作斗争的风险由此规避：后端只暴露钩子，无法触及协调器的私有编排状态。第三方后端仍然可以完全不使用协调器、直接实现抽象服务，包括不可变逻辑检查，以及通过 `load` 实现的默认准备回退。
 
 协调器为每个存活的 `Session` 实例持有一个生命周期条目：初始化，加上一个包私有写入控制器，后者负责待处理事件、固定批处理截止时间、活跃写入、失败保留和共享 flush 屏障。每个 `session/event` 都进入这条有界写入路径，`session/flush` 则绕过等待以观察完全停稳。控制器归并由 [flush 控制器简化](../simplification/2026-07-23-collapse-persistence-flush-state.md)定义；调度节奏由[有界批处理决策](2026-08-08-bounded-session-persistence-write-batching.md)定义。
 
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 测试
 
-共享的 `runPersistenceContract`（公开 API 契约）为每个后端运行，并证明 `inspect` 会配平被中断的逻辑视图但不改变存储或修订版本，随后由 `prepare` 或 `load` 提交恢复。`runCoordinatorContract`（`tests/coordinator-contract.ts`）通过内存参考实现、JSONL 与 SQLite 覆盖接管、HMR、碰撞、会话与后端 dispose 排空和崩溃尾部修复。`persistence.spec.ts`、`preparations.spec.ts` 与 `write-behind.spec.ts` 覆盖准备复用与预留、有界准备状态淘汰、固定窗口后续批次、存活控制器清理、同 id 链尾竞态、失败批次重试与关闭顺序。各后端自身的测试规格只保留存储机制。每个真实后端都有一个经由协调器的崩溃尾部修复测试，以覆盖不透明 marker 分支，因为契约中的崩溃用例会产生合成 closers，却不会产生 torn marker。
+共享的 `runPersistenceContract`（公开 API 约定）为每个后端运行，并证明 `inspect` 会配平被中断的逻辑视图但不改变存储或修订版本，随后由 `prepare` 或 `load` 提交恢复。`runCoordinatorContract`（`tests/coordinator-contract.ts`）通过内存参考实现、JSONL 与 SQLite 覆盖接管、HMR、碰撞、会话与后端 dispose 排空和崩溃尾部修复。`persistence.spec.ts`、`preparations.spec.ts` 与 `write-behind.spec.ts` 覆盖准备复用与预留、有界准备状态淘汰、固定窗口后续批次、存活控制器清理、同 id 链尾竞态、失败批次重试与关闭顺序。各后端自身的测试规格只保留存储机制。每个真实后端都有一个经由协调器的崩溃尾部修复测试，以覆盖不透明 marker 分支，因为约定中的崩溃用例会产生合成 closers，却不会产生 torn marker。
 
 ## 曾考虑的替代方案
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-branded-ids.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-branded-ids.md
-2026-06-20-branded-ids.md: 7c0b7ca89418e8312ec728223dac519f70edc3ed
-2026-06-20-branded-ids.zh.md: 039953754b184af97eb9b4ea3bbb1325d45eda25
+2026-06-20-branded-ids.md: 78242226103fef0eac320cdfac0ccb82292fd9e8
+2026-06-20-branded-ids.zh.md: 613ef81d198f10ec70ca5cb019776e607f4a8a79

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-branded-ids.md

@@ -8,21 +8,21 @@ English | [中文](2026-06-20-branded-ids.zh.md)
 
 The harness brands `CallId` (`packages/llm/llm/src/brand.ts`) and the shared agent/session `SessionId` (`packages/core/session/src/types.ts`) using the `Branded<B> = string & { readonly [BRAND]: B }` machinery (owned by the type-only `@deepseek-ai/dsh-brand` package at `packages/util/brand/` — see its [README](../../../../packages/util/brand/README.md)) and a zero-cost cast factory per type. `dsh-brand` also states the governing policy: *"Branding is for ids that cross package boundaries and could plausibly be confused; not every string needs a brand."* That policy is right; the problem is that it is only half-applied. Two gaps let a structurally-identical-but-semantically-wrong string slip through the type checker today.
 
-**Gap 1 — unbranded cross-boundary IDs in the bash seam.** The background-task id is a plain `string`: `BashTask.id: string` (`packages/bash/bash/src/types.ts`), carried as `string` through the whole executor seam (`BashExecutor.get`/`ownerOf`/`readOutput`/`kill(id: string)` in `packages/bash/bash/src/index.ts`) and validated/passed as `string` by the model-facing tools (`validateTaskId`, `assertTaskAccess`, the `task_id` schema arg in `packages/bash/tool-bash/src/index.ts`). It is generated by a per-executor counter — `` `bash-${this.nextTaskId++}` `` in `packages/bash/bash-local/src/index.ts` — which gives it **exactly the same `name-N` shape as `SessionId`'s default** (`` `session-${++counter}` `` in `packages/core/session/src/index.ts`). A bash task id and a session id are trivially swappable at a call site and the compiler says nothing. This is the headline case the user asked about, and it is a model-facing id (the model passes `task_id` back to `bash_output`/`bash_kill`), so a confusion here is reachable from untrusted input.
+**Gap 1 — unbranded cross-boundary IDs in the bash seam.** The background-task id is a plain `string`: `BashTask.id: string` (`packages/bash/bash/src/types.ts`), carried as `string` through the whole executor seam (`BashExecutor.get`/`ownerOf`/`readOutput`/`kill(id: string)` in `packages/bash/bash/src/index.ts`) and validated/passed as `string` by the model-facing tools (`validateTaskId`, `assertTaskAccess`, the `task_id` schema arg in `packages/bash/tool-bash/src/index.ts`). It is generated by a per-executor counter — `` `bash-${this.nextTaskId++}` `` in `packages/bash/bash-local/src/index.ts` — which gives it **exactly the same `name-N` shape as `SessionId`'s default** (`` `session-${++counter}` `` in `packages/core/session/src/index.ts`). A bash task id and a session id are trivially swappable at a call site and the compiler says nothing. It is a model-facing id (the model passes `task_id` back to `bash_output`/`bash_kill`), so a confusion here is reachable from untrusted input.
 
 The bash **owner token** is the related sub-case: `BashExecRequest.owner?: string` and `BashExecSpec.owner: string | undefined` (`packages/bash/bash/src/types.ts`) are documented as a deliberately *opaque* isolation key, but in every live caller the value IS the owning agent's shared `Agent.id`/`SessionId` (`callerToken = (exec) => exec.agent?.id` in `packages/bash/tool-bash/src/index.ts`) wearing a different seam-local name. It is compared for access control (`owner !== callerToken(exec)`), so a mismatched-but-well-typed string here is a cross-session isolation bug the type system currently cannot catch. This is the shared id alias covered by the [unified agent/session identity decision](../simplification/2026-06-20-unify-agent-and-session-id.md).
 
-**Gap 2 — brand erosion at the seams of the *already-branded* IDs.** Even `CallId` and `SessionId` decay back to bare `string` at exactly the places confusion is most likely: registry/store key types and public method params. Representative sites include the session store, the agent registry (both keyed by the shared `SessionId`), tool-presentation call-id maps, ACP's session records, and the persistence coordinator. A brand that is dropped at a collection key buys nothing on lookups — the value of the existing brands is partly unrealized.
+**Gap 2 — brand erosion at the boundaries of the *already-branded* IDs.** Even `CallId` and `SessionId` decay back to bare `string` at exactly the places confusion is most likely: registry/store key types and public method params. Representative sites include the session store, the agent registry (both keyed by the shared `SessionId`), tool-presentation call-id maps, ACP's session records, and the persistence coordinator. A brand that is dropped at a collection key buys nothing on lookups — the value of the existing brands is partly unrealized.
 
 ## Decision
 
-A type-only change. Brands are zero-cost casts; nothing about runtime behavior, serialization, comparison, or the wire format changes. The work is in three parts, all honoring the existing "not every string" policy.
+A type-only change. Brands are zero-cost casts; nothing about runtime behavior, serialization, comparison, or the wire format changes. The decision has three parts, all honoring the existing "not every string" policy.
 
-- **Brand the bash task id.** Add `BashTaskId = Branded<'BashTaskId'>` plus its same-named factory in `packages/bash/bash/src/types.ts` (the package that *owns* the id), importing `Branded` from `@deepseek-ai/dsh-brand` exactly as `SessionId` does. The brand primitive lives in the dependency-free `dsh-brand` utility package precisely so `dsh-bash` can brand its ids by depending on it alone — it never pulls in `dsh-llm` (or `dsh-session`) just to reach `Branded`. Thread it through `BashTask.id`, the `BashExecutor` seam methods (`get`/`ownerOf`/`readOutput`/`kill`), the generation site in `dsh-bash-local` (brand the counter output once, at creation), and the `dsh-tool-bash` validate/access surface (`validateTaskId` returns a `BashTaskId`; `task_id` is branded at the tool boundary where the model's string arrives).
+- **Brand the bash task id.** Add `BashTaskId = Branded<'BashTaskId'>` plus its same-named factory in `packages/bash/bash/src/types.ts` (the package that *owns* the id), importing `Branded` from `@deepseek-ai/dsh-brand` exactly as `SessionId` does. The brand primitive lives in the dependency-free `dsh-brand` utility package precisely so `dsh-bash` can brand its ids by depending on it alone — it never pulls in `dsh-llm` (or `dsh-session`) just to reach `Branded`. Thread it through `BashTask.id`, the `BashExecutor` Service Definition methods (`get`/`ownerOf`/`readOutput`/`kill`), the generation site in `dsh-bash-local` (brand the counter output once, at creation), and the `dsh-tool-bash` validate/access surface (`validateTaskId` returns a `BashTaskId`; `task_id` is branded at the tool boundary where the model's string arrives).
 
-- **Mint a distinct `OwnerToken` brand.** Add `OwnerToken = Branded<'OwnerToken'>` in `packages/bash/bash/src/types.ts`; type `BashExecRequest.owner` / `BashExecSpec.owner` / `BashExecutor.ownerOf` as `OwnerToken | undefined`. The `dsh-tool-bash` consumer casts the agent's shared `id` (`SessionId`) into an `OwnerToken` at the boundary — the one place the two vocabularies meet. The bash seam never imports `dsh-session`. (Rationale in the next section.)
+- **Mint a distinct `OwnerToken` brand.** Add `OwnerToken = Branded<'OwnerToken'>` in `packages/bash/bash/src/types.ts`; type `BashExecRequest.owner` / `BashExecSpec.owner` / `BashExecutor.ownerOf` as `OwnerToken | undefined`. The `dsh-tool-bash` consumer casts the agent's shared `id` (`SessionId`) into an `OwnerToken` at the boundary — the one place the two vocabularies meet. The bash Service Definition never imports `dsh-session`. (Rationale in the next section.)
 
-- **Stop the brand erosion.** Propagate the existing brands to the `Map` key types and public method params listed under Gap 2 — `Map<SessionId, Session>`, `Map<SessionId, Agent>`, `get(id: SessionId)`, `Map<CallId, …>`, ACP's `SessionId` surface, and the coordinator's `Map<SessionId, …>`. This is the larger mechanical share of the diff and the part that makes the *existing* brands actually load-bearing on lookups, not just on struct fields.
+- **Stop the brand erosion.** Propagate the existing brands to the `Map` key types and public method params listed under Gap 2 — `Map<SessionId, Session>`, `Map<SessionId, Agent>`, `get(id: SessionId)`, `Map<CallId, …>`, ACP's `SessionId` surface, and the coordinator's `Map<SessionId, …>`. This is the larger mechanical share of the change and the part that makes the *existing* brands actually load-bearing on lookups, not just on struct fields.
 
 Illustrative shape (the factory pattern is identical to the three existing brands):
 
@@ -46,24 +46,24 @@ export function OwnerToken(id: string): OwnerToken {
 
 ### Why not typing `owner` as `SessionId`?
 
-The obvious shortcut is to type `owner` as `SessionId` directly — it always *is* one. We reject that. The bash executor seam is a capability seam (interface `dsh-bash`, implementation `dsh-bash-local`, consumer `dsh-tool-bash`) and its owner token is *documented as deliberately opaque*: the executor "never interprets it (no access policy lives in the seam — that is the consumer's job)" (`packages/bash/bash/src/types.ts`). Typing the seam's field as `SessionId` would import `dsh-session`'s vocabulary into a package that must not know what an owner token *means* — it would couple a generic execution backend to the session model and contradict the opaque-token design. A sandboxed or remote executor that replaces `dsh-bash-local` should not inherit a session dependency. The distinct `OwnerToken` brand keeps the seam decoupled: `dsh-bash` knows only "an owner is some opaque branded token," and the `dsh-tool-bash` consumer — which already decides the access policy — is the single boundary that casts its `SessionId` into an `OwnerToken`. The brand still delivers the safety win (you cannot pass a `BashTaskId` or a raw string where an owner is expected) without the coupling.
+The obvious shortcut is to type `owner` as `SessionId` directly — it always *is* one. We reject that. The bash executor seam is a capability seam (Service Definition `dsh-bash`, Service provider `dsh-bash-local`, Consumer `dsh-tool-bash`) and its owner token is *documented as deliberately opaque*: the executor "never interprets it (no access policy lives in the seam — that is the consumer's job)" (`packages/bash/bash/src/types.ts`). Typing the Service Definition's field as `SessionId` would import `dsh-session`'s vocabulary into a package that must not know what an owner token *means* — it would couple a generic execution backend to the session model and contradict the opaque-token design. A sandboxed or remote executor that replaces `dsh-bash-local` should not inherit a session dependency. The distinct `OwnerToken` brand keeps the seam decoupled: `dsh-bash` knows only "an owner is some opaque branded token," and the `dsh-tool-bash` consumer — which already decides the access policy — is the single boundary that casts its `SessionId` into an `OwnerToken`. The brand still delivers the safety win (you cannot pass a `BashTaskId` or a raw string where an owner is expected) without the coupling.
 
 ## Out of scope / possible extensions
 
 Kept deliberately narrow per the "not every string needs a brand" policy. Each of these is a plausible future brand, deferred with a reason, not a commitment:
 
-- **`ModelId`** (`GenerateOptions.model`, the `LlmService` adapter-registry key) — a real cross-package lookup key (config → agent → llm → adapter); a reasonable next brand, left out only to keep this Agent Note's blast radius focused.
+- **`ModelId`** (`GenerateOptions.model`, the `LlmService` adapter-registry key) — a real cross-package lookup key (config → agent → llm → adapter); a reasonable next brand, left out only to keep this decision's blast radius focused.
 - **`ToolName`** (the `ToolRegistry` key) — author-defined, human-readable, and rarely confused with another id; the weakest candidate, likely not worth a brand.
 - **`ErrorCode`** (`HarnessError.code`) — a closed vocabulary (`ABORTED`, `NO_ADAPTER`, …), not a per-instance id; better served by a string-literal union than a brand, if anything.
 - **Numeric ordinals** — turn number, step number, and the event `seq` are `number`, not `string`, so `Branded<string>` does not apply; a parallel `number & { readonly [BRAND]: B }` variant could brand them, but they are positional ordinals rarely passed across boundaries, so the payoff is low.
-- **Validated construction** — the brand factories are pure casts with no runtime check, and every boundary (ACP `sessionId`, provider-issued `call.id`, the empty-string fallback in `dsh-llm-deepseek`) trusts the raw string today. A `SessionId.parse()` / `isValid()` companion that throws on malformed input at boundaries is a genuine gap, but it is a *runtime-behavior* change with its own design (what is "malformed"? what do we do on failure?) and belongs in its own Agent Note, not bundled into this type-only pass.
+- **Validated construction** — the brand factories are pure casts with no runtime check, and every boundary (ACP `sessionId`, provider-issued `call.id`, the empty-string fallback in `dsh-llm-deepseek`) trusts the raw string today. A `SessionId.parse()` / `isValid()` companion that throws on malformed input at boundaries is a genuine gap, but it is a *runtime-behavior* change with its own design (what is "malformed"? what happens on failure?) and belongs in its own decision, not bundled into this type-only change.
 
 ## Verification
 
-The landed invariants: `BashTaskId` and `OwnerToken` are defined in `dsh-bash` and threaded end-to-end (executor seam, the `dsh-bash-local` generation site, the `dsh-tool-bash` model-facing surface) with no `dsh-bash` dependency on `dsh-session`; no collection keyed by an in-scope branded id (`CallId`/`SessionId`/`BashTaskId`) is keyed by bare `string`; public method params and exported signatures keep the brand; and brands are constructed via the cast factory at each boundary where a raw string enters (provider call id, ACP session id, model-supplied `task_id`), never as scattered `as` casts.
+The landed invariants: `BashTaskId` and `OwnerToken` are defined in `dsh-bash` and threaded end-to-end (Service Definition, the `dsh-bash-local` generation site, the `dsh-tool-bash` model-facing surface) with no `dsh-bash` dependency on `dsh-session`; no collection keyed by an in-scope branded id (`CallId`/`SessionId`/`BashTaskId`) is keyed by bare `string`; public method params and exported signatures keep the brand; and brands are constructed via the cast factory at each boundary where a raw string enters (provider call id, ACP session id, model-supplied `task_id`), never as scattered `as` casts.
 
 ## Consequences
 
-- **Mechanical churn across two surfaces.** Propagating brands touches the bash seam (interface + impl + consumer) and the ACP session-id surface plus the persistence coordinator. The churn is broad but low-severity: a missed site is a compile error, not a silent bug. The change is observably type-only — no snapshot or e2e behavioral diff. It sits next to the [unified agent/session identity decision](../simplification/2026-06-20-unify-agent-and-session-id.md) because both touch the session-id / owner-token boundary; `OwnerToken` stays distinct from the unified id for the decoupling reason above.
-- **Brands do not validate.** A brand is a confusability guard, not a correctness proof: a *wrong* session id that is still a well-formed string passes the type checker exactly as before. This Agent Note does not close that gap (see Out of scope) — it only stops the *category* error of passing the wrong *kind* of id.
-- **The "where to stop" line stays a judgment call.** Branding `BashTaskId` but not `ToolName`, `OwnerToken` but not `ModelId`, is a taste call about which strings "could plausibly be confused." Reasonable reviewers may want more or fewer; the policy in `brand.ts` is the tie-breaker, and this Agent Note errs toward the ids that are model-facing or used for access control.
+- **Mechanical churn across two surfaces.** Propagating brands touches the bash seam (Service Definition + Service provider + Consumer) and the ACP session-id surface plus the persistence coordinator. The churn is broad but low-severity: a missed site is a compile error, not a silent bug. The change is observably type-only — no snapshot or e2e behavioral diff. It sits next to the [unified agent/session identity decision](../simplification/2026-06-20-unify-agent-and-session-id.md) because both touch the session-id / owner-token boundary; `OwnerToken` stays distinct from the unified id for the decoupling reason above.
+- **Brands do not validate.** A brand is a confusability guard, not a correctness proof: a *wrong* session id that is still a well-formed string passes the type checker exactly as before. This decision does not close that gap (see Out of scope) — it only stops the *category* error of passing the wrong *kind* of id.
+- **The "where to stop" line stays a judgment call.** Branding `BashTaskId` but not `ToolName`, `OwnerToken` but not `ModelId`, is a taste call about which strings "could plausibly be confused." Reasonable reviewers may want more or fewer; the policy in `brand.ts` is the tie-breaker, and this decision errs toward the ids that are model-facing or used for access control.

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-branded-ids.zh.md

@@ -8,21 +8,21 @@ Status: implemented
 
 harness 使用 `Branded<B> = string & { readonly [BRAND]: B }` 机制，为 `CallId`（`packages/llm/llm/src/brand.ts`）和 agent/会话共享的 `SessionId`（`packages/core/session/src/types.ts`）做 brand 处理；该机制由纯类型包 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-brand` 拥有，位于 `packages/util/brand/`，见其 [README](../../../../packages/util/brand/README.md)，并为每个类型提供零开销的 cast 工厂。`dsh-brand` 还声明了治理策略：*「Branding 用于跨包边界且可能被混淆的 id；不是每个 string 都需要 brand。」* 这条策略是正确的；问题在于它只落实了一半。两处缺口使得结构相同但语义错误的 string 今天仍能通过类型检查器。
 
-**缺口 1：bash seam 中未 brand 的跨边界 ID。** 后台 task id 是普通 `string`：`BashTask.id: string`（`packages/bash/bash/src/types.ts`），作为 `string` 贯穿整个执行器 seam（`packages/bash/bash/src/index.ts` 中的 `BashExecutor.get`/`ownerOf`/`readOutput`/`kill(id: string)`），再由面向模型的工具以 `string` 校验并传递（`validateTaskId`、`assertTaskAccess`、`packages/bash/tool-bash/src/index.ts` 中 `task_id` 的 schema 参数）。它由每执行器计数器生成——`packages/bash/bash-local/src/index.ts` 中的 `` `bash-${this.nextTaskId++}` ``——其形状与 `SessionId` 的默认值**完全相同，都是 `name-N`**（`packages/core/session/src/index.ts` 中的 `` `session-${++counter}` ``）。bash task id 和会话 id 在调用点轻易就能互换，而编译器毫无反应。这是用户询问的核心案例，并且它是面向模型的 id（模型会把 `task_id` 传回 `bash_output`/`bash_kill`），所以该混淆可由不受信任的输入触达。
+**缺口 1：bash seam 中未 brand 的跨边界 ID。** 后台 task id 是普通 `string`：`BashTask.id: string`（`packages/bash/bash/src/types.ts`），作为 `string` 贯穿整个执行器 seam（`packages/bash/bash/src/index.ts` 中的 `BashExecutor.get`/`ownerOf`/`readOutput`/`kill(id: string)`），再由面向模型的工具以 `string` 校验并传递（`validateTaskId`、`assertTaskAccess`、`packages/bash/tool-bash/src/index.ts` 中 `task_id` 的 schema 参数）。它由每执行器计数器生成——`packages/bash/bash-local/src/index.ts` 中的 `` `bash-${this.nextTaskId++}` ``——其形状与 `SessionId` 的默认值**完全相同，都是 `name-N`**（`packages/core/session/src/index.ts` 中的 `` `session-${++counter}` ``）。bash task id 和会话 id 在调用点轻易就能互换，而编译器毫无反应。它是面向模型的 id（模型会把 `task_id` 传回 `bash_output`/`bash_kill`），所以该混淆可由不受信任的输入触达。
 
 bash **owner token** 是相关的子情形：`BashExecRequest.owner?: string` 和 `BashExecSpec.owner: string | undefined`（`packages/bash/bash/src/types.ts`）被文档描述为刻意*不透明*的隔离键，但在所有实际调用方中，该值就是所属 agent（智能体）共享的 `Agent.id`/`SessionId`（`callerToken = (exec) => exec.agent?.id`，位于 `packages/bash/tool-bash/src/index.ts`），只是披着另一个 seam 本地名称。它被用于访问控制比较（`owner !== callerToken(exec)`），因此一个不匹配但类型正确的 string 在此处就是跨会话隔离 bug，而当前类型系统无法捕获。这正是[统一 agent/session 标识决策](../simplification/2026-06-20-unify-agent-and-session-id.md)覆盖的共享 id 别名。
 
-**缺口 2：*已经 brand* 的 ID 在 seam 处被侵蚀。** 就连 `CallId` 和 `SessionId` 也恰好在最容易混淆的地方退化为裸 `string`：注册表/store 键类型和公开方法参数。代表性位置包括会话存储、agent 注册表（二者都以共享的 `SessionId` 为键）、工具展示层的 call-id map、ACP（Agent Client Protocol）的会话记录，以及持久化协调器。在集合键处丢弃 brand，会让既有 brand 在查找时毫无价值；它们的价值只实现了一部分。
+**缺口 2：*已经 brand* 的 ID 在边界处被侵蚀。** 就连 `CallId` 和 `SessionId` 也恰好在最容易混淆的地方退化为裸 `string`：注册表/store 键类型和公开方法参数。代表性位置包括会话存储、agent 注册表（二者都以共享的 `SessionId` 为键）、工具展示层的 call-id map、ACP（Agent Client Protocol）的会话记录，以及持久化协调器。在集合键处丢弃 brand，会让既有 brand 在查找时毫无价值；它们的价值只实现了一部分。
 
 ## 决策
 
-纯类型变更。Brand 是零开销 cast；运行时行为、序列化、比较和协议格式（wire format）均不变。工作分三部分，全部遵循既有的「不是每个 string 都需要」策略。
+纯类型变更。Brand 是零开销 cast；运行时行为、序列化、比较和协议格式（wire format）均不变。该决策分三部分，全部遵循既有的「不是每个 string 都需要」策略。
 
-- **为 bash task id 加 brand。** 在 `packages/bash/bash/src/types.ts`（*拥有*该 id 的包）中添加 `BashTaskId = Branded<'BashTaskId'>` 及其同名工厂，从 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-brand` 导入 `Branded`，方式与 `SessionId` 完全一致。brand 原语位于无依赖的 `dsh-brand` 工具包中，正是为了让 `dsh-bash` 仅依赖它就能为自己的 id 加 brand，而无需引入 `dsh-llm`（或 `dsh-session`）来获取 `Branded`。将其贯穿 `BashTask.id`、`BashExecutor` seam 方法（`get`/`ownerOf`/`readOutput`/`kill`）、`dsh-bash-local` 中的生成点（在创建时对计数器输出做一次 brand），以及 `dsh-tool-bash` 的校验/访问面（`validateTaskId` 返回 `BashTaskId`；`task_id` 在模型 string 到达的工具边界处被 brand）。
+- **为 bash task id 加 brand。** 在 `packages/bash/bash/src/types.ts`（*拥有*该 id 的包）中添加 `BashTaskId = Branded<'BashTaskId'>` 及其同名工厂，从 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-brand` 导入 `Branded`，方式与 `SessionId` 完全一致。brand 原语位于无依赖的 `dsh-brand` 工具包中，正是为了让 `dsh-bash` 仅依赖它就能为自己的 id 加 brand，而无需引入 `dsh-llm`（或 `dsh-session`）来获取 `Branded`。将其贯穿 `BashTask.id`、`BashExecutor` Service Definition 方法（`get`/`ownerOf`/`readOutput`/`kill`）、`dsh-bash-local` 中的生成点（在创建时对计数器输出做一次 brand），以及 `dsh-tool-bash` 的校验/访问面（`validateTaskId` 返回 `BashTaskId`；`task_id` 在模型 string 到达的工具边界处被 brand）。
 
-- **铸造独立的 `OwnerToken` brand。** 在 `packages/bash/bash/src/types.ts` 中添加 `OwnerToken = Branded<'OwnerToken'>`；将 `BashExecRequest.owner` / `BashExecSpec.owner` / `BashExecutor.ownerOf` 的类型标注为 `OwnerToken | undefined`。`dsh-tool-bash` 消费方在边界处将 agent 共享的 `id`（`SessionId`）cast 为 `OwnerToken`——这是两套词汇唯一交汇的地方。bash seam 从不导入 `dsh-session`。（理由见下一节。）
+- **铸造独立的 `OwnerToken` brand。** 在 `packages/bash/bash/src/types.ts` 中添加 `OwnerToken = Branded<'OwnerToken'>`；将 `BashExecRequest.owner` / `BashExecSpec.owner` / `BashExecutor.ownerOf` 的类型标注为 `OwnerToken | undefined`。`dsh-tool-bash` 消费方在边界处将 agent 共享的 `id`（`SessionId`）cast 为 `OwnerToken`——这是两套词汇唯一交汇的地方。bash Service Definition 从不导入 `dsh-session`。（理由见下一节。）
 
-- **阻止 brand 侵蚀。** 将既有 brand 传播到缺口 2 列出的 `Map` 键类型和公开方法参数中：`Map<SessionId, Session>`、`Map<SessionId, Agent>`、`get(id: SessionId)`、`Map<CallId, …>`、ACP 的 `SessionId` surface、协调器的 `Map<SessionId, …>`。这是 diff 中机械量最大的部分，也是让*既有* brand 在查找处真正发挥作用（而不仅仅标注在结构体字段上）的关键。
+- **阻止 brand 侵蚀。** 将既有 brand 传播到缺口 2 列出的 `Map` 键类型和公开方法参数中：`Map<SessionId, Session>`、`Map<SessionId, Agent>`、`get(id: SessionId)`、`Map<CallId, …>`、ACP 的 `SessionId` surface、协调器的 `Map<SessionId, …>`。这是变更中机械量最大的部分，也是让*既有* brand 在查找处真正发挥作用（而不仅仅标注在结构体字段上）的关键。
 
 示意形状（工厂模式与已有的三个 brand 完全一致）：
 
@@ -46,24 +46,24 @@ export function OwnerToken(id: string): OwnerToken {
 
 ### 为什么不把 `owner` 类型标注为 `SessionId`？
 
-显而易见的捷径是直接把 `owner` 类型标注为 `SessionId`——它确实*总是*一个会话 id。我们否决这个方案。bash 执行器 seam 是能力 seam（接口 `dsh-bash`、实现 `dsh-bash-local`、消费方 `dsh-tool-bash`），其 owner token 被*明确记录为刻意不透明*：执行器「从不解释它（seam 中没有访问策略——那是消费方的职责）」（`packages/bash/bash/src/types.ts`）。把 seam 字段类型标注为 `SessionId`，会把 `dsh-session` 的词汇引入一个不应知道 owner token *含义*的包——这会让通用执行后端耦合会话模型，并违背不透明 token 的设计。取代 `dsh-bash-local` 的沙箱或远程执行器不应继承会话依赖。独立的 `OwnerToken` brand 使 seam 保持解耦：`dsh-bash` 只知道「owner 是某种带 brand 的不透明 token」，而已经决定访问策略的 `dsh-tool-bash` 消费方，是把其 `SessionId` cast 为 `OwnerToken` 的唯一边界。该 brand 仍带来安全收益（不能把 `BashTaskId` 或裸 string 传到 owner 位置），且不引入耦合。
+显而易见的捷径是直接把 `owner` 类型标注为 `SessionId`——它确实*总是*一个会话 id。我们否决这个方案。bash 执行器 seam 是能力 seam（Service Definition `dsh-bash`、Service provider `dsh-bash-local`、Consumer `dsh-tool-bash`），其 owner token 被*明确记录为刻意不透明*：执行器「从不解释它（seam 中没有访问策略——那是消费方的职责）」（`packages/bash/bash/src/types.ts`）。把 Service Definition 的字段类型标注为 `SessionId`，会把 `dsh-session` 的词汇引入一个不应知道 owner token *含义*的包——这会让通用执行后端耦合会话模型，并违背不透明 token 的设计。取代 `dsh-bash-local` 的沙箱或远程执行器不应继承会话依赖。独立的 `OwnerToken` brand 使 seam 保持解耦：`dsh-bash` 只知道「owner 是某种带 brand 的不透明 token」，而已经决定访问策略的 `dsh-tool-bash` 消费方，是把其 `SessionId` cast 为 `OwnerToken` 的唯一边界。该 brand 仍带来安全收益（不能把 `BashTaskId` 或裸 string 传到 owner 位置），且不引入耦合。
 
 ## 不在范围内 / 可能的扩展
 
 遵循「不是每个 string 都需要 brand」的策略，刻意保持窄范围。以下每项都是合理的未来 brand 候选，附带推迟理由而非承诺：
 
-- **`ModelId`**（`GenerateOptions.model`，`LlmService` 适配器注册表的键）：一个真正的跨包查找键（config → agent → llm → 适配器）；合理的下一个 brand，仅为控制本 Agent Note 的影响范围而暂不纳入。
+- **`ModelId`**（`GenerateOptions.model`，`LlmService` 适配器注册表的键）：一个真正的跨包查找键（config → agent → llm → 适配器）；合理的下一个 brand，仅为控制本决策的影响范围而暂不纳入。
 - **`ToolName`**（`ToolRegistry` 的键）：由作者定义、人类可读，且很少与其他 id 混淆；最弱的候选，可能不值得加 brand。
 - **`ErrorCode`**（`HarnessError.code`）：一个封闭词汇（`ABORTED`、`NO_ADAPTER`……），不是逐实例的 id；如果要做，string 字面量联合类型比 brand 更合适。
 - **数值序号**：轮次号、步骤号和事件 `seq` 是 `number` 而非 `string`，`Branded<string>` 不适用；可以用并行的 `number & { readonly [BRAND]: B }` 变体来 brand 它们，但它们是位置序号、很少跨边界传递，收益较低。
-- **带校验的构造**：brand 工厂是纯 cast，无运行时检查，且每个边界（ACP `sessionId`、提供方签发的 `call.id`、`dsh-llm-deepseek` 中的空字符串回退）今天都信任裸 string。一个在边界处对格式错误的输入抛异常的 `SessionId.parse()` / `isValid()` 配套工具确实是缺口，但它是*运行时行为*变更，有自己的设计问题（什么算「格式错误」？失败时怎么办？），应在独立 Agent Note 中处理，不应捆绑进这次纯类型变更。
+- **带校验的构造**：brand 工厂是纯 cast，无运行时检查，且每个边界（ACP `sessionId`、提供方签发的 `call.id`、`dsh-llm-deepseek` 中的空字符串回退）今天都信任裸 string。一个在边界处对格式错误的输入抛异常的 `SessionId.parse()` / `isValid()` 配套工具确实是缺口，但它是*运行时行为*变更，有自己的设计问题（什么算「格式错误」？失败时会怎样？），应在独立决策中处理，不应捆绑进这次纯类型变更。
 
 ## 验证
 
-已落地的不变式：`BashTaskId` 和 `OwnerToken` 定义在 `dsh-bash` 中，并端到端贯穿执行器 seam、`dsh-bash-local` 生成点与 `dsh-tool-bash` 面向模型的 surface，且 `dsh-bash` 未添加对 `dsh-session` 的依赖；没有任何以范围内 brand id（`CallId`/`SessionId`/`BashTaskId`）为键的集合使用裸 `string`；公开方法参数和导出签名保留 brand；每个原始 string 进入的边界（提供方 call id、ACP 会话 id、模型提供的 `task_id`）都通过 cast 工厂构造 brand，而不是散落的 `as` cast。
+已落地的不变式：`BashTaskId` 和 `OwnerToken` 定义在 `dsh-bash` 中，并端到端贯穿 Service Definition、`dsh-bash-local` 生成点与 `dsh-tool-bash` 面向模型的 surface，且 `dsh-bash` 未添加对 `dsh-session` 的依赖；没有任何以范围内 brand id（`CallId`/`SessionId`/`BashTaskId`）为键的集合使用裸 `string`；公开方法参数和导出签名保留 brand；每个原始 string 进入的边界（提供方 call id、ACP 会话 id、模型提供的 `task_id`）都通过 cast 工厂构造 brand，而不是散落的 `as` cast。
 
 ## 后果
 
-- **两个接口面的机械性改动。** 传播 brand 涉及 bash seam（接口 + 实现 + 消费方）以及 ACP 会话 id 接口和持久化协调器。改动面广但严重度低：遗漏的位置是编译错误而非静默 bug。变更可观察地为纯类型变更——无快照或 e2e 行为差异。它与[统一 agent/会话标识决策](../simplification/2026-06-20-unify-agent-and-session-id.md)相邻，因为二者都触及会话 id / owner-token 边界；`OwnerToken` 出于上述解耦理由仍与统一后的 id 保持独立。
-- **Brand 不做校验。** Brand 是混淆防护，不是正确性证明：一个*错误的*会话 id 只要仍是格式正确的 string，就和以前一样能通过类型检查器。本 Agent Note 不关闭这个缺口（见「不在范围内」）——它只阻止这类*类别*错误：传入错误*种类*的 id。
-- **「在哪里停下」仍是判断题。** 为 `BashTaskId` 加 brand 但不为 `ToolName` 加，为 `OwnerToken` 加但不为 `ModelId` 加，是对哪些 string「可能被混淆」的品味判断。合理的评审者可能想要更多或更少；`brand.ts` 中的策略是裁决依据，本 Agent Note 倾向于面向模型或用于访问控制的 id。
+- **两个接口面的机械性改动。** 传播 brand 涉及 bash seam（Service Definition + Service provider + Consumer）以及 ACP 会话 id 接口和持久化协调器。改动面广但严重度低：遗漏的位置是编译错误而非静默 bug。变更可观察地为纯类型变更——无快照或 e2e 行为差异。它与[统一 agent/会话标识决策](../simplification/2026-06-20-unify-agent-and-session-id.md)相邻，因为二者都触及会话 id / owner-token 边界；`OwnerToken` 出于上述解耦理由仍与统一后的 id 保持独立。
+- **Brand 不做校验。** Brand 是混淆防护，不是正确性证明：一个*错误的*会话 id 只要仍是格式正确的 string，就和以前一样能通过类型检查器。本决策不关闭这个缺口（见「不在范围内」）——它只阻止这类*类别*错误：传入错误*种类*的 id。
+- **「在哪里停下」仍是判断题。** 为 `BashTaskId` 加 brand 但不为 `ToolName` 加，为 `OwnerToken` 加但不为 `ModelId` 加，是对哪些 string「可能被混淆」的品味判断。合理的评审者可能想要更多或更少；`brand.ts` 中的策略是裁决依据，本决策倾向于面向模型或用于访问控制的 id。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md
-2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md: cb9d9487cd274696ae20dddab8c6888b4cf4b833
-2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.zh.md: fe5ca223975445991e7fe96376cbfccf432ad241
+2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md: 0dd49fe60f2c45081973657ff960b780d2d47257
+2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.zh.md: 6e8458aea73536859bf4c81894679d31a5034d3a

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md

@@ -17,13 +17,13 @@ The `tasks/` package group owns background-task semantics:
 - `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks` registers running work as `ctx.tasks` and owns task ids, authorization, snapshots, reads, cancellation, waiting, completion listeners, and cleanup.
 - `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks` exposes `task_output`, `task_list`, and `task_kill`, injects completion notices, and supplies the background-task system-prompt guidance.
 
-Long-running tools are producers. `dsh-tool-bash` adapts a `BashProcess` into incremental output and process cancellation; `dsh-tool-subagent` adapts a child run into final output and child disposal. The execution seams remain independent of sessions and the task registry.
+Long-running tools are producers. `dsh-tool-bash` adapts a `BashProcess` into incremental output and process cancellation; `dsh-tool-subagent` adapts a child run into final output and child disposal. The bash and subagent capability seams remain independent of sessions and the task registry.
 
-`TaskService` is the abstract seam in `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks`; the process-local registry is `LocalTaskService` in `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local` (the [task-registry seam Agent Note](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md) records that split).
+`TaskService` is the Service Definition in `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks`; the process-local provider is `LocalTaskService` in `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local` (the [task-registry contract Agent Note](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md) records that split).
 
 ## Runtime contract
 
-The literal types live in the [task data-structure catalog](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/tasks.md). A producer calls `ctx.tasks.start()` with a kind, label, optional owning `Agent`, optional positive `outputLimitBytes`, and a `run()` function. The runtime completes all failable preflight work before calling `run()` and invokes it once. After `run()` returns hooks, registration commits without another failable step; a producer cannot start work that lacks a collectable task id.
+The literal types live on the [tasks subsystem page](../../../../docs/subsystems/tasks.md). A producer calls `ctx.tasks.start()` with a kind, label, optional owning `Agent`, optional positive `outputLimitBytes`, and a `run()` function. The runtime completes all failable preflight work before calling `run()` and invokes it once. After `run()` returns hooks, registration commits without another failable step; a producer cannot start work that lacks a collectable task id.
 
 `outputLimitBytes` is producer-owned presentation policy, not a registry buffer. The registry validates and projects it unchanged into `TaskSnapshot`; generic control surfaces apply the cap to complete model-facing output after adding their own status or notice metadata. Omitting it preserves the existing surface behavior, so the runtime does not impose a hidden default on unrelated producer families.
 
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ Separate bash and subagent output/stop tools duplicate ids, isolation, cleanup,
 
 ### An immediate abstract task-runtime backend
 
-The current `TaskStart.run()` contract passes in-process callbacks and exact `Agent` objects. A durable backend changes identity, restart, ownership, and observation semantics, so at introduction time the registry stayed one concrete service rather than freezing the wrong boundary. The [task-registry seam Agent Note](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md) later separated the contract from the process-local implementation without changing these in-process semantics.
+The current `TaskStart.run()` contract passes in-process callbacks and exact `Agent` objects. A durable backend changes identity, restart, ownership, and observation semantics, so at introduction time the registry stayed one concrete service rather than freezing the wrong boundary. The [task-registry contract Agent Note](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md) later separated the contract from the process-local implementation without changing these in-process semantics.
 
 ### Consumer-owned authorization or cleanup events
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.zh.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 问题
 
-后台 bash 原本兼有两项职责：bash 执行器既运行进程，又管理 task id、所有权、增量读取、取消、完成监听器和面向模型的控制工具。新增后台 subagent 需要相同的生命周期与交互契约。如果每种长时间运行能力都独立实现该契约，就会重复隔离、清理、通知和提示词行为，还会让模型为每种生产方学习不同的收集与停止协议。
+后台 bash 原本兼有两项职责：bash 执行器既运行进程，又管理 task id、所有权、增量读取、取消、完成监听器和面向模型的控制工具。新增后台 subagent 需要相同的生命周期与交互约定。如果每种长时间运行能力都独立实现该约定，就会重复隔离、清理、通知和提示词行为，还会让模型为每种生产方学习不同的收集与停止协议。
 
 任务注册表、控制工具与完成通知共同构成一项 harness 功能。bash 和 subagent 只提供执行专属的钩子，不拥有通用任务行为。
 
@@ -17,13 +17,13 @@ Status: implemented
 - `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks` 将运行中的工作注册为 `ctx.tasks`，并拥有 task id、授权、快照、读取、取消、等待、完成监听器与清理。
 - `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks` 暴露 `task_output`、`task_list` 和 `task_kill`，注入完成通知，并提供后台任务的系统提示词指导。
 
-长时间运行工具是生产方。`dsh-tool-bash` 将 `BashProcess` 适配为增量输出与进程取消；`dsh-tool-subagent` 将子运行适配为最终输出与子运行释放。执行 seam 保持独立，不依赖会话或任务注册表。
+长时间运行工具是生产方。`dsh-tool-bash` 将 `BashProcess` 适配为增量输出与进程取消；`dsh-tool-subagent` 将子运行适配为最终输出与子运行释放。bash 与 subagent 能力 seam 保持独立，不依赖会话或任务注册表。
 
-`TaskService` 是 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks` 中的抽象 seam；进程内注册表是 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local` 中的 `LocalTaskService`（该拆分记录在[任务注册表 seam Agent Note](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md)中）。
+`TaskService` 是 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks` 中的 Service Definition；进程内 Service provider 是 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local` 中的 `LocalTaskService`（该拆分记录在[任务注册表约定 Agent Note](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md)中）。
 
-## 运行时契约
+## 运行时约定
 
-字面类型见[任务数据结构目录](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/tasks.md)。生产方调用 `ctx.tasks.start()`，传入 kind、label、可选的所属 `Agent`、可选的正数 `outputLimitBytes` 与一个 `run()` 函数。运行时会在调用 `run()` 前完成所有可能失败的预检工作，并且只调用一次。`run()` 返回钩子后，注册过程不会再执行可能失败的步骤而直接提交；生产方无法启动没有可收集 task id 的工作。
+字面类型见[任务子系统页面](../../../../docs/subsystems/tasks.md)。生产方调用 `ctx.tasks.start()`，传入 kind、label、可选的所属 `Agent`、可选的正数 `outputLimitBytes` 与一个 `run()` 函数。运行时会在调用 `run()` 前完成所有可能失败的预检工作，并且只调用一次。`run()` 返回钩子后，注册过程不会再执行可能失败的步骤而直接提交；生产方无法启动没有可收集 task id 的工作。
 
 `outputLimitBytes` 是生产方拥有的呈现策略，而非注册表缓冲区。注册表校验该值，并将其原样投影到 `TaskSnapshot`；通用控制接口添加自身的状态或通知元数据后，再将该上限应用于完整的面向模型输出。省略该值时保持现有接口行为，因此运行时不会向无关的生产方类别施加隐式默认值。
 
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 运行时为 `done` 附加一个 continuation，记录第一个终止结果、解决等待方，并逐个调用完成监听器，同时隔离每个监听器的错误。首次结果优先的结算在资源销毁期间至关重要：如果 `cancel` 抛出，运行时会强制将记录标为失败，并警告工作可能遗留，而不是永远等待一个可能永不完成的 promise。后续生产方结果不能覆盖该诊断，也不能重复通知。`cancel` 返回后如果最终未使 `done` 完成，仍会阻塞资源销毁，因为运行时无法区分这种情况与缓慢但有效的停止。
 
-任务注册不是生产方工具 fiber 的 effect。因此，重新加载工具或控制接口插件不会终止由 agent（智能体）和后端拥有的工作。任务服务自身释放时会取消所有实时任务，并等待遵守契约的生产方。
+任务注册不是生产方工具 fiber 的 effect。因此，重新加载工具或控制接口插件不会终止由 agent（智能体）和后端拥有的工作。任务服务自身释放时会取消所有实时任务，并等待遵守约定的生产方。
 
 ## 授权与所有者生命周期
 
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ task id 在运行时全局可见且可预测，因此注册表会授权每次访
 
 某个所有者的第一个任务会向 `owner.ctx` 附加一个异步 effect。agent 作用域释放时会取消该所有者的实时任务、等待其终止记录，并移除其快照。该 effect 可跨生产方重载存续，并加入 agent 现有的完全停稳边界。任务服务保留 effect disposer，使服务重载可以在全局资源销毁后，从仍然存活的 agent 作用域中分离回调。
 
-对于遵守契约的生产方，`AgentHandle.dispose()` 只在所属后台工作停止后解决。需要比 agent 存活更久的工作必须以无所有者方式启动；要跨运行时重启存续，则需另行设计持久任务。
+对于遵守约定的生产方，`AgentHandle.dispose()` 只在所属后台工作停止后解决。需要比 agent 存活更久的工作必须以无所有者方式启动；要跨运行时重启存续，则需另行设计持久任务。
 
 ## 服务接口
 
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ bash seam 暴露 `resolve`、`run` 和 `start`。`start(spec)` 返回一个 `Bas
 
 ### 立即抽象任务运行时后端
 
-当前 `TaskStart.run()` 契约传入进程内回调与确切的 `Agent` 对象。持久化后端会改变身份、重启、所有权与观察语义，因此在引入之时注册表保持为单一具体服务，而非固化错误的边界。[任务注册表 seam Agent Note](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md)后来在不改变这些进程内语义的前提下，将契约与进程内实现分离。
+当前 `TaskStart.run()` 约定传入进程内回调与确切的 `Agent` 对象。持久化后端会改变身份、重启、所有权与观察语义，因此在引入之时注册表保持为单一具体服务，而非固化错误的边界。[任务注册表约定 Agent Note](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md)后来在不改变这些进程内语义的前提下，将约定与进程内实现分离。
 
 ### 由消费方负责授权或清理事件
 
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ bash seam 暴露 `resolve`、`run` 和 `start`。`start(spec)` 返回一个 `Bas
 
 ### 随机 id、提升或生命周期会话事件
 
-授权而非不可猜测性才是访问边界，并且 id 不用于派生文件系统路径；顺序生成的品牌化 id 可保持 transcript（文本记录）易读。将前台任务提升为后台任务需要 SDK 并未规定的用户交互契约。启动、读取和通知已作为工具与上下文事件记录，因此专用任务会话事件会重复面向模型的事实。
+授权而非不可猜测性才是访问边界，并且 id 不用于派生文件系统路径；顺序生成的品牌化 id 可保持 transcript（文本记录）易读。将前台任务提升为后台任务需要 SDK 并未规定的用户交互约定。启动、读取和通知已作为工具与上下文事件记录，因此专用任务会话事件会重复面向模型的事实。
 
 ## 测试
 
@@ -129,6 +129,6 @@ bash seam 暴露 `resolve`、`run` 和 `start`。`start(spec)` 返回一个 `Bas
 
 ## 后果
 
-bash 命令与 subagent 共享一套 id 词汇、列表、通知格式、提示词习惯和控制工具。新的长时间运行生产方只需实现执行钩子，而不必再实现一套注册表与工具族。[工具实操手册](../../../../docs/cookbook/adding-a-tool.md)将生产方指向本契约。
+bash 命令与 subagent 共享一套 id 词汇、列表、通知格式、提示词习惯和控制工具。新的长时间运行生产方只需实现执行钩子，而不必再实现一套注册表与工具族。[工具实操手册](../../../../docs/cookbook/adding-a-tool.md)将生产方指向本约定。
 
 有所属后台 bash 会随其 agent 一起停止，不再比 agent 存活更久。后台进程没有执行器超时；调用方必须终止无关工作，或依赖所有者/服务释放。流式读取只支持一个消费方，完成通知不会唤醒空闲 agent；生产方的 `cancel` 返回后如果未使 `done` 完成，仍可能阻塞资源销毁。持久任务、独立观察游标和前台提升仍属于单独设计。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.md
-2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.md: 587f2d26eee922e91c8797018964f983890eb8ec
-2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.zh.md: be52ece63ce794cb13cdf657b73bae6e9f42cf6d
+2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.md: 985ac3803b8d35ea9275052946dc2cbb33480a9f
+2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.zh.md: 8d845cce797d3a17d1223970186a23ffcece1ec8

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.md

@@ -48,11 +48,11 @@ Adapters extract structured facts before falling back to message inspection. The
 
 The shared transient-code set is intentionally small: adapter mappings for `RATE_LIMIT` and `SERVER`, explicit `TIMEOUT` and `TRANSPORT` codes for remote failures, and `EMPTY_RESPONSE` for a completed provider response with no content blocks. Both adapters classify the last case as an error finish; see [empty model responses are retryable](../bug-fix/2026-07-24-empty-model-response-is-retryable.md). Authentication, quota, invalid request, context overflow, protocol, abort, and unknown failures keep distinct stable codes and are not transient by default. Adding a code requires adapter fixtures and a documented policy decision; it does not require expanding a second failure-class enum.
 
-### Put retry policy on the existing failed-step seam
+### Put retry policy on the existing failed-step extension point
 
 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-llm-retry` is a function plugin that listens to `agent/request-error`. It introduces no service or new loop branch; the agent-loop package changes only the data carried through its existing failed-step recovery control flow.
 
-The `agent/request-error` seam carries the current `LlmFailure`, an immutable list of prior failures that authorized retry turns in the consecutive recovery sequence, and the serving registration's immutable retry policy. The loop transports but does not interpret that policy, owns the consecutive failure history, and clears it after a successful model request. Normal `dsh-llm-retry` policy counts durable retry records scheduled by the same exact-provider policy, while `dsh-compact-basic` keeps its own context-overflow budget. Alternating transient and context-overflow failures therefore consume their owning finite budgets independently; the maximum request count is one plus the sum of the loaded finite budgets.
+The `agent/request-error` waterfall carries the current `LlmFailure`, an immutable list of prior failures that authorized retry turns in the consecutive recovery sequence, and the serving registration's immutable retry policy. The loop transports but does not interpret that policy, owns the consecutive failure history, and clears it after a successful model request. Normal `dsh-llm-retry` policy counts durable retry records scheduled by the same exact-provider policy, while `dsh-compact-basic` keeps its own context-overflow budget. Alternating transient and context-overflow failures therefore consume their owning finite budgets independently; the maximum request count is one plus the sum of the loaded finite budgets.
 
 The [provider-policy decision](../feature/2026-07-24-provider-retry-policies.md) owns the current configuration shape. Provider adapters register their nested `retryPolicy`; omission uses normal defaults: two transient retries, a 500 millisecond initial delay, a 10 second delay cap, 10 percent jitter, and the five transient codes above. The count and delay bounds match the conservative edge of the inspected implementations: [OpenCode uses two request retries with 500 ms/10 s bounds](https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/blob/9976269ab1accfc9f9dc98a4a688c516934de422/%70ackages/llm/src/route/executor.ts#L36-L39), [Pi separates three agent-level retries from provider retries and defaults provider retries to zero](https://github.com/earendil-works/pi/blob/3da591ab74ab9ab407e72ed882600b2c851fae21/%70ackages/coding-agent/docs/settings.md#L139-L147), and [Codex uses finite request/stream budgets plus a five-minute idle timeout](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0fb559f0f6e231a88ac02ea002d3ecd248e2b515/codex-rs/model-provider-info/src/lib.rs#L25-L33). Ten percent follows [Codex's bounded jitter](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0fb559f0f6e231a88ac02ea002d3ecd248e2b515/codex-rs/codex-client/src/retry.rs#L40-L47).
 
@@ -74,9 +74,9 @@ Adapters perform one provider request per `stream()` call. The pi-ai adapter rem
 
 ### Bound stalled streams where they can be stopped
 
-Each adapter exposes a validated `streamIdleTimeoutMs` configuration field with the five-minute prior-art default cited above. The interval is capped at Node's maximum timer delay so it cannot be clamped to one millisecond. It covers each outstanding iterator `next()` from demand to the next valid `StreamChunk`; time a consumer spends between `next()` calls is not provider idle time.
+Each adapter exposes a validated `streamIdleTimeoutMs` configuration field with the five-minute prior-art default cited above. The interval is capped at Node's maximum timer delay so it cannot be clamped to one millisecond. It covers each outstanding iterator `next()` from demand to adapter-recognized provider activity; time a consumer spends between `next()` calls is not provider idle time. DeepSeek SSE comments count as transport activity but never become `StreamChunk` values or session-log events.
 
-`@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout` exposes a rearmable idle-watchdog primitive. One stable local `AbortController` is fused with the caller signal and passed to the transport for the whole adapter call; each outstanding `next()` arms the watchdog, resolution disarms it, and the next demand rearms it. Timeout aborts that stable controller with a capability-owned `TimeoutReason`, and `finally` clears the timer. The adapter classifies its watchdog as `TIMEOUT` and an earlier upstream abort as `ABORTED`. The existing one-shot `deadline()` is not presented as a sliding timer.
+`@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout` exposes a rearmable idle-watchdog primitive. One stable local `AbortController` is fused with the caller signal and passed to the transport for the whole adapter call; each outstanding `next()` arms the watchdog, resolution disarms it, and the next demand rearms it. Out-of-band transport activity calls `pulse()` to rearm an outstanding demand without yielding a value. Timeout aborts that stable controller with a capability-owned `TimeoutReason`, and `finally` clears the timer. The adapter classifies its watchdog as `TIMEOUT` and an earlier upstream abort as `ABORTED`. The existing one-shot `deadline()` is not presented as a sliding timer.
 
 Boundary tests prove termination at both actual transports. The hand-written adapter aborts its fetch/reader, and the pi-ai adapter maps the stable signal through the SDK and proves the SDK closes the response. A timer that merely rejects a consumer promise while leaving the request running does not satisfy the contract.
 
@@ -113,9 +113,9 @@ If recovery is exhausted, the final failure is stored once on `turn/end.reason`
 - `agent/request-error` carries current failure facts, immutable prior-retried failure facts, and the serving registration's immutable retry policy; a success clears the history, and alternating transient/context-overflow integration tests prove the two policies consume only their own finite budgets.
 - Each provider adapter validates its nested retry policy at Loader startup, and `ctx.llm` captures it with the route; normal mode delegates ineligible paths and makes at most `maxRetries + 1` provider requests when no other policy applies.
 - HMR-during-backoff tests prove disposal unregisters the listener, aborts and awaits its captured callbacks, emits no retry decision after disposal, and leaves no timer or promise alive.
-- Pure unit tests cover transient-code selection, exponential backoff and jitter bounds, valid and over-cap `Retry-After`, exhausted budgets, deterministic timer/random seams, and abort during backoff.
+- Pure unit tests cover transient-code selection, exponential backoff and jitter bounds, valid and over-cap `Retry-After`, exhausted budgets, deterministic timer/random hooks, and abort during backoff.
 - Real agent-loop tests cover failure before chunks, partial chunks then failure, thrown and in-band failures, retry to success in a new turn, exhaustion to structured `turn/end.reason`, and composition with `dsh-compact-basic` context-overflow recovery.
-- The partial-chunk integration test proves failed chunks remain attributed to the failed step, no assistant message or tool side effect is committed for that step, and the successful retry has distinct provenance.
+- The partial-chunk integration test proves failed chunks remain attributed to the failed step, no assistant message or tool side effect is committed for that step, and the successful retry records its own chunk seqs and provider/model route.
 - The plugin-owned `llm/retry` event is non-surface, survives JSONL and SQLite round trips, is ignored by message derivation, and drives TUI and Web retraction plus scheduled-retry rendering. Client tests cover complete wire validation, clock-independent countdown, cancellation versus completed retry labels, and trajectory attribution; keyless UI snapshots cover Web scheduling and success, a real Web composition test covers partial transport failure through recovery, and ACP automation snapshots confirm that a discarded attempt stays off the wire while the recovered reply is emitted.
 - Idle-watchdog tests prove the stable signal is rearmed only while `next()` is outstanding, disarmed during consumer think time and in `finally`, and classified separately from a total-call deadline and an earlier caller abort; adapter tests prove the signal stops the underlying request rather than merely detaching it.
 - Direct `ctx.llm.stream()` callers remain single-attempt and receive the same structured failure facts.
@@ -134,5 +134,5 @@ If recovery is exhausted, the final failure is stored once on `turn/end.reason`
 - [Structured error taxonomy](../../implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-structured-error-taxonomy.md) owns stable machine-routable codes and cause chaining.
 - [Reconstructable requests](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.md) makes provider/model and complete request inputs durable before dispatch.
 - [Timeout deadline library](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-06-timeout-deadline-library.md) separates shared deadline classification from capability-owned termination.
-- [After-call compaction pressure and context-overflow recovery](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md) owns the current closed-step request-recovery seam and bounded overflow retry.
+- [After-call compaction pressure and context-overflow recovery](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md) owns the current closed-step request-recovery extension point and bounded overflow retry.
 - [Provider-routed LLM adapters](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-14-provider-routed-llm-adapters.md) owns explicit provider/model routing and the one-adapter-per-provider invariant.

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.zh.md

@@ -4,11 +4,11 @@ Status: implemented
 
 [English](2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.md) | 中文
 
-[按提供方配置的请求重试策略](../feature/2026-07-24-provider-retry-policies.md)在此基础上增加了确切提供方配置与显式无界 mode。本说明继续负责结构化失败事实、已关闭步骤的恢复边界、normal mode 的暂时性默认值、可见的单次尝试和持久重试状态。[LLM 流的终止失败](2026-07-29-terminal-llm-stream-failures.md)取代了其中关于抛出错误身份和 stream sidecar 的机制。
+[按提供方配置的请求重试策略](../feature/2026-07-24-provider-retry-policies.md)在此基础上增加了确切提供方配置与显式无界 mode。本说明继续负责结构化失败事实、已关闭步骤的恢复边界、normal mode 的暂时性默认值、可见的单次尝试和持久重试状态。[LLM 流的终止失败](2026-07-29-terminal-llm-stream-failures.md)取代了其中关于抛出错误身份和流伴随状态的机制。
 
 ## 问题
 
-提供方适配器可能在分发或迭代时抛出异常，也可能以 `finish { kind: 'error' | 'aborted' }` 结束。最终适配器边界会在 `dsh-agent-loop` 接收前把抛出值规范化为该终止 finish 协议；middleware 与结果处理缺陷仍会抛出。loop 会将终止模型请求失败交给 `agent/request-error`。未被处理的失败是终态；处理失败的监听器修复策略自有状态，返回 `{ kind: 'retry' }`，并停止 waterfall 委托。[重试动作决策](../simplification/2026-07-27-request-error-retry-action.md)规定这一返回契约。
+提供方适配器可能在分发或迭代时抛出异常，也可能以 `finish { kind: 'error' | 'aborted' }` 结束。最终适配器边界会在 `dsh-agent-loop` 接收前把抛出值规范化为该终止 finish 协议；middleware 与结果处理缺陷仍会抛出。loop 会将终止模型请求失败交给 `agent/request-error`。未被处理的失败是终态；处理失败的监听器修复策略自有状态，返回 `{ kind: 'retry' }`，并停止 waterfall（瀑布式事件）委托。[重试动作决策](../simplification/2026-07-27-request-error-retry-action.md)规定这一返回约定。
 
 该边界已能安全地再次发起请求。原始 `assistant/chunk` 事件携带失败的 `turn` 和 `step`；除非某条成功的 `assistant/message` 引用这些事件，否则消息派生会忽略它们。只有终止性 finish 成功且组装完成后，系统才会分发工具调用；重试则会从持久日志开启新的编号轮次。因此，harness 无需引入第二套响应生命周期或暂定输出协议，即可分隔两次尝试。
 
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ interface LlmFailure {
 
 `code` 仍是 `HarnessError` 建立的提供方无关机器路由分类体系；新字段是在提供方边界观测到的事实。`ProviderRequestId` 由 `dsh-llm` 拥有并构造，序列化后为提供方发放的字符串。该载荷有意不包含 `retryable`、`failover`、`partialOutput`、提供方、模型、阶段或路由 id 字段。是否可重试属于策略，提供方／模型已位于持久请求头中，部分输出则从失败步骤的 `assistant/chunk` 事件派生。
 
-`LlmError` 携带 `failure: LlmFailure`，并保持 `failure.code === error.code`。`FinishReasonMap.error` 和 `FinishReasonMap.aborted` 携带同一载荷，而不是并行的失败形状。最终适配器边界会从适配器抛出值中分离这些事实，并发出相应的终止 finish；未知 SDK 异常会获得 `UNKNOWN` 载荷。精确的抛出对象身份不会跨越 LLM stream seam。
+`LlmError` 携带 `failure: LlmFailure`，并保持 `failure.code === error.code`。`FinishReasonMap.error` 和 `FinishReasonMap.aborted` 携带同一载荷，而不是并行的失败形状。最终适配器边界会从适配器抛出值中分离这些事实，并发出相应的终止 finish；未知 SDK 异常会获得 `UNKNOWN` 载荷。精确的抛出对象身份不会跨越 LLM 流 seam。
 
 agent loop（智能体循环）会将终止 finish 的 `LlmFailure` 传给 `agent/request-error`，并在记录未恢复的 `turn/end.reason` 时使用同一载荷。
 
@@ -48,11 +48,11 @@ agent loop（智能体循环）会将终止 finish 的 `LlmFailure` 传给 `agen
 
 共享的暂时性 code 集有意保持很小：适配器针对 `RATE_LIMIT` 和 `SERVER` 的映射，远程失败使用的显式 `TIMEOUT` 和 `TRANSPORT` code，以及提供方响应已完成却没有内容块时使用的 `EMPTY_RESPONSE`。两个适配器都会把最后一种情况归类为错误 finish；详见[空模型响应可重试](../bug-fix/2026-07-24-empty-model-response-is-retryable.md)。身份验证、配额、无效请求、上下文溢出、协议、中止和未知失败都保留不同的稳定 code，且默认不属于暂时性失败。新增 code 需要适配器 fixture（测试前置数据）和已记录的策略决策；无需扩展第二个失败类枚举。
 
-### 将重试策略放在现有失败步骤 seam 上
+### 将重试策略放在现有失败步骤扩展点上
 
 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-llm-retry` 是监听 `agent/request-error` 的函数插件。它不引入服务或新的循环分支；agent-loop 包仅会更改通过现有失败步骤恢复控制流携带的数据。
 
-`agent/request-error` seam 携带当前 `LlmFailure`、在连续恢复序列中授权重试轮次的不可变先前失败列表，以及实际服务注册所对应的不可变重试策略。循环只传递而不解释该策略；它拥有连续失败历史，并在模型请求成功后清除。`dsh-llm-retry` 的 normal 策略统计由同一项确切提供方策略安排的持久重试记录，`dsh-compact-basic` 则维护自己的上下文溢出预算。因此，暂时性失败与上下文溢出交替出现时，会各自独立消耗其有限预算；最大请求数等于 1 加上所有已加载有限预算之和。
+`agent/request-error` waterfall 携带当前 `LlmFailure`、在连续恢复序列中授权重试轮次的不可变先前失败列表，以及实际服务注册所对应的不可变重试策略。循环只传递而不解释该策略；它拥有连续失败历史，并在模型请求成功后清除。`dsh-llm-retry` 的 normal 策略统计由同一项确切提供方策略安排的持久重试记录，`dsh-compact-basic` 则维护自己的上下文溢出预算。因此，暂时性失败与上下文溢出交替出现时，会各自独立消耗其有限预算；最大请求数等于 1 加上所有已加载有限预算之和。
 
 当前配置形状由[提供方策略决策](../feature/2026-07-24-provider-retry-policies.md)规定。提供方适配器会注册嵌套的 `retryPolicy`；省略时使用 normal 默认值：两次暂时性重试、500 毫秒初始延迟、10 秒延迟上限、10% 抖动，以及上述五个暂时性 code。计数与延迟边界参考了所调查实现中较保守的一端：[OpenCode 使用两次请求重试，延迟边界为 500 毫秒／10 秒](https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/blob/9976269ab1accfc9f9dc98a4a688c516934de422/%70ackages/llm/src/route/executor.ts#L36-L39)；[Pi 将三次 agent 级重试与提供方重试分开，且提供方重试默认为零](https://github.com/earendil-works/pi/blob/3da591ab74ab9ab407e72ed882600b2c851fae21/%70ackages/coding-agent/docs/settings.md#L139-L147)；[Codex 使用有限请求／流预算以及五分钟空闲超时](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0fb559f0f6e231a88ac02ea002d3ecd248e2b515/codex-rs/model-provider-info/src/lib.rs#L25-L33)。10% 抖动参考 [Codex 的有界抖动](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0fb559f0f6e231a88ac02ea002d3ecd248e2b515/codex-rs/codex-client/src/retry.rs#L40-L47)。
 
@@ -74,15 +74,15 @@ agent-spine 演示组合包加载该插件，因此共享的 stdio/TUI、一次
 
 ### 在能够终止停滞流的位置施加边界
 
-每个适配器都公开一个经过验证的 `streamIdleTimeoutMs` 配置字段，默认值采用上文引用的五分钟先例。该间隔不超过 Node 的最大定时器延迟，因此不会被钳制为 1 毫秒。它覆盖每个尚未完成的迭代器 `next()`：从消费方请求下一项开始，到下一条有效 `StreamChunk` 到达为止；消费方在两次 `next()` 调用之间花费的时间不属于提供方空闲时间。
+每个适配器都公开一个经过验证的 `streamIdleTimeoutMs` 配置字段，默认值采用上文引用的五分钟先例。该间隔不超过 Node 的最大定时器延迟，因此不会被钳制为 1 毫秒。它覆盖每个尚未完成的迭代器 `next()`：从消费方请求下一项开始，到适配器识别到提供方活动为止；消费方在两次 `next()` 调用之间花费的时间不属于提供方空闲时间。DeepSeek SSE（Server-Sent Events）注释计为传输活动，但绝不会成为 `StreamChunk` 值或会话日志事件。
 
-`@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout` 公开一个可重新布防的空闲看门狗原语。一个稳定的局部 `AbortController` 会与调用方信号融合，并在整个适配器调用期间传给传输层；每个尚未完成的 `next()` 都会布防看门狗，该调用完成时解除布防，下一次请求数据时再重新布防。超时会使用能力自身拥有的 `TimeoutReason` 中止这个稳定控制器，`finally` 则会清除定时器。适配器将自身看门狗归类为 `TIMEOUT`，将更早发生的上游中止归类为 `ABORTED`。现有的一次性 `deadline()` 不会被描述为滑动计时器。
+`@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout` 公开一个可重新布防的空闲看门狗原语。一个稳定的局部 `AbortController` 会与调用方信号融合，并在整个适配器调用期间传给传输层；每个尚未完成的 `next()` 都会布防看门狗，该调用完成时解除布防，下一次请求数据时再重新布防。带外传输活动会调用 `pulse()`，在不产生值的情况下为尚未完成的需求重新布防。超时会使用能力自身拥有的 `TimeoutReason` 中止这个稳定控制器，`finally` 则会清除定时器。适配器将自身看门狗归类为 `TIMEOUT`，将更早发生的上游中止归类为 `ABORTED`。现有的一次性 `deadline()` 不会被描述为滑动计时器。
 
-边界测试证明两个实际传输层都能终止。手写适配器会中止其 fetch／reader，pi-ai 适配器会把稳定信号映射到 SDK，并证明 SDK 会关闭响应。如果定时器只拒绝消费方 promise，却让请求继续运行，就不满足此契约。
+边界测试证明两个实际传输层都能终止。手写适配器会中止其 fetch／reader，pi-ai 适配器会把稳定信号映射到 SDK，并证明 SDK 会关闭响应。如果定时器只拒绝消费方 promise，却让请求继续运行，就不满足此约定。
 
 ### 在现有日志中分隔尝试
 
-一次失败尝试可以在已关闭的步骤中留下 `assistant/chunk` 事件，但绝不会追加 `assistant/message`，也不会分发工具。重试会关闭失败轮次，开启下一个编号轮次，从持久表层重建请求，并生成自己的分片。步骤仍处于打开状态时，UI 可以渲染实时分片；当 `llm/retry` 标识失败步骤，或 `turn/end` 记录失败时，UI 再标记或清除这份暂时视图。Web 会验证完整的重试载荷契约，在 `llm/retry` 到达时清除失败的部分输出，将连续重试轮次的事件投影为稳定的一行，并用最新一次尝试更新该行，再从后续轮次事实派生 scheduled、started 或 cancelled 状态。倒计时以浏览器收到事件的时刻为计划延迟的起点，而不是使用 Host 事件时钟；它按向上取整且不低于 1 秒的秒数显示，仅在重试尚未结束时显示动画，并把最近一次失败的准确详情折叠在该行之后。即使失败尝试没有 assistant 节点，重试节点也会锚定自身的轨迹轮次。消息派生仍会忽略失败分片；Web 在重建历史时也会应用同一投影，因此刷新页面不会让已丢弃的部分输出重新出现，也不会生成重复的重试行。
+一次失败尝试可以在已关闭的步骤中留下 `assistant/chunk` 事件，但绝不会追加 `assistant/message`，也不会分发工具。重试会关闭失败轮次，开启下一个编号轮次，从持久表层重建请求，并生成自己的分片。步骤仍处于打开状态时，UI 可以渲染实时分片；当 `llm/retry` 标识失败步骤，或 `turn/end` 记录失败时，UI 再标记或清除这份暂时视图。Web 会验证完整的重试载荷约定，在 `llm/retry` 到达时清除失败的部分输出，将连续重试轮次的事件投影为稳定的一行，并用最新一次尝试更新该行，再从后续轮次事实派生 scheduled、started 或 cancelled 状态。倒计时以浏览器收到事件的时刻为计划延迟的起点，而不是使用 Host 事件时钟；它按向上取整且不低于 1 秒的秒数显示，仅在重试尚未结束时显示动画，并把最近一次失败的准确详情折叠在该行之后。即使失败尝试没有 assistant 节点，重试节点也会锚定自身的轨迹轮次。消息派生仍会忽略失败分片；Web 在重建历史时也会应用同一投影，因此刷新页面不会让已丢弃的部分输出重新出现，也不会生成重复的重试行。
 
 如果恢复预算耗尽，最终失败会连同结构化事实在 `turn/end.reason` 中存储一次。Web 会在该序列位置派生一个 `turn-error` 节点，并内联渲染适合展示的消息与可选错误码；AUTH 投影会把可能回显凭据片段的提供方文案替换为 `API key is invalid`，原始诊断仍保留在会话日志中。实时事件和历史回放使用同一套折叠逻辑。如果暂时性恢复继续，`llm/retry` 就是该次尝试的失败与延迟的持久归属位置，因此该失败轮次不会再获得终态错误行。本决策不增加独立的最终错误事件或响应 id 词汇。
 
@@ -107,15 +107,15 @@ agent-spine 演示组合包加载该插件，因此共享的 stdio/TUI、一次
 ## 验证
 
 - `LlmFailure` 是适配器抛出、错误 finish 和中止 finish 使用的唯一可序列化载荷；在可用时，规范化保留稳定 code、状态、重试延迟、品牌化的提供方请求 id，以及调用方中止与适配器超时之间的分类。
-- 适配器抛出值会在抵达消费方前成为终止失败 chunk；middleware 与消费方异常仍在模型请求恢复之外抛出。
+- 适配器抛出值会在抵达消费方前成为终止失败分片；middleware 与消费方异常仍在模型请求恢复之外抛出。
 - DeepSeek 和 pi-ai 适配器测试覆盖具有代表性的 400、401/403、429、5xx、连接、格式错误／截断流、超时、中止、Retry-After 秒数／日期、请求 id 和未知 SDK 错误路径，恢复策略无需解析消息文本。
 - pi-ai 将 SDK 选项固定为零次重试，并针对可重试的提供方响应执行一次可观测的线路请求尝试；独立测试确保移除任一边界都会失败。
 - `agent/request-error` 携带当前失败事实、不可变的先前已重试失败事实，以及实际服务注册所对应的不可变重试策略；成功会清除历史，暂时性失败／上下文溢出交替发生的集成测试证明两种策略只消耗各自的有限预算。
 - 每个提供方适配器都在 Loader 启动时验证其嵌套重试策略，`ctx.llm` 则将该策略与路由一同捕获；normal mode 会委托不合格路径，而且在没有其他策略时最多发起 `maxRetries + 1` 次提供方请求。
 - 退避期间执行 HMR 的测试证明：dispose 过程会注销监听器、中止并等待其捕获的回调，dispose 后不发出重试决策，也不留下存活的定时器或 promise。
-- 纯单元测试覆盖暂时性 code 选择、指数退避和抖动边界、有效及超出上限的 `Retry-After`、耗尽的预算、确定性定时器／随机数 seam，以及退避期间中止。
+- 纯单元测试覆盖暂时性 code 选择、指数退避和抖动边界、有效及超出上限的 `Retry-After`、耗尽的预算、确定性定时器／随机数钩子，以及退避期间中止。
 - 真实 agent-loop 测试覆盖分片前失败、部分分片后失败、抛出及带内失败、在新轮次中重试至成功、耗尽后写入结构化 `turn/end.reason`，以及与 `dsh-compact-basic` 上下文溢出恢复的组合。
-- 部分分片集成测试证明：失败分片仍归属于失败步骤，该步骤不会提交 assistant 消息或工具副作用，成功的重试具有不同的来源信息。
+- 部分分片集成测试证明：失败分片仍归属于失败步骤，该步骤不会提交 assistant 消息或工具副作用，成功的重试会记录自己的分片 seq 和提供方／模型路由。
 - 插件拥有的不进入表层的 `llm/retry` 事件可在 JSONL 和 SQLite 往返后保留，被消息派生忽略，并驱动 TUI 和 Web 撤回及计划重试渲染。客户端测试覆盖完整的 wire 验证、独立于时钟的倒计时、已取消与已完成重试标签的区别以及轨迹归属；无密钥 UI 快照覆盖 Web 的调度与成功，真实 Web 组合测试覆盖部分传输失败直至恢复，ACP 自动化快照确认，被丢弃的尝试不会通过协议发出，而恢复后的回复会正常发出。
 - 空闲看门狗测试证明：只有 `next()` 尚未完成时才会重新布防稳定信号；在消费方思考期间及 `finally` 中会解除布防；它与总调用 deadline 以及更早发生的调用方中止分开分类。适配器测试证明该信号会终止底层请求，而不只是与其脱离。
 - `ctx.llm.stream()` 的直接调用方仍只尝试一次，并收到相同的结构化失败事实。
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ agent-spine 演示组合包加载该插件，因此共享的 stdio/TUI、一次
 - 提供方 SDK 可能隐藏状态或重试标头。适配器会保留 SDK 公开的稳定事实，否则使用粗粒度 code，而不会让恢复策略解析脆弱的文本。
 - 持久重试事件扩展了会话协议和 UI 状态机。事件与其消费方一同交付，可避免产生无人使用的遥测词汇；但以后更改 schema 仍需要同步完成持久化和回放工作。
 - 清除失败步骤的实时分片可能会明显撤回输出。与把丢弃的文本或不完整工具 JSON 呈现为已提交历史相比，这是更好的选择；快照固定这一转换。
-- 适配器局部的空闲强制机制可以终止停滞的传输，而不会计入消费方思考时间。每个传输边界的契约测试会防止 SDK 漂移。
+- 适配器局部的空闲强制机制可以终止停滞的传输，而不会计入消费方思考时间。每个传输边界的约定测试会防止 SDK 漂移。
 - 多个 normal 恢复插件会叠加各自的有限预算。always mode 会先委托，再提供无界回退；重叠的分类器仍会形成依赖注册顺序的策略，必须由引入它们的插件记录并测试。
 
 ## 相关资料
@@ -134,5 +134,5 @@ agent-spine 演示组合包加载该插件，因此共享的 stdio/TUI、一次
 - [结构化错误分类体系](../../implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-structured-error-taxonomy.md)负责稳定、可供机器路由的 code 与 cause chaining。
 - [可重建请求](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.md)使提供方／模型和完整请求输入在分发前持久化。
 - [超时 deadline 库](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-06-timeout-deadline-library.md)将共享的 deadline 分类与能力自身拥有的终止操作分开。
-- [调用后压缩压力与上下文溢出恢复](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md)负责当前已关闭步骤的请求恢复 seam 与有界溢出重试。
+- [调用后压缩压力与上下文溢出恢复](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md)负责当前已关闭步骤的请求恢复扩展点与有界溢出重试。
 - [提供方路由的 LLM（大语言模型）适配器](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-14-provider-routed-llm-adapters.md)负责显式提供方／模型路由与每个提供方仅有一个适配器的不变量。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.md
-2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.md: ad9d65805c8f0c96bd811b5036310d019760627e
-2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.zh.md: 3021c7fcca00f2e929d997625c303f9a27dbf673
+2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.md: 12482ca80d19e5cd1e62b8860865db6cccea61ab
+2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.zh.md: 43f356887948b88d34ba41d46ed1cd2f1c89a1e2

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.zh.md)
 
 ## Problem
 
-LLM provider requests should identify the product making them. That is useful for provider-side support, abuse investigation, compatibility debugging, and traffic analytics. Before this Agent Note the harness only partially did this: the hand-rolled DeepSeek adapter sent a hand-copied `User-Agent` constant (`packages/llm/llm-deepseek/src/adapter.ts`), while the pi-ai-backed twin sent no harness-owned headers at all (`packages/llm/llm-pi-ai/src/adapter.ts`). New adapters could therefore omit attribution silently, and a library-backed adapter could drift from the hand-rolled adapter even though [the twin-adapter Agent Note](2026-06-13-twin-llm-adapters.md) exists to keep the provider seam honest across both implementations.
+LLM provider requests should identify the product making them. That is useful for provider-side support, abuse investigation, compatibility debugging, and traffic analytics. Before this Agent Note the harness only partially did this: the hand-rolled DeepSeek adapter sent a hand-copied `User-Agent` constant (`packages/llm/llm-deepseek/src/adapter.ts`), while the pi-ai-backed twin sent no harness-owned headers at all (`packages/llm/llm-pi-ai/src/adapter.ts`). New adapters could therefore omit attribution silently, and a library-backed adapter could drift from the hand-rolled adapter even though [the twin-adapter Agent Note](2026-06-13-twin-llm-adapters.md) exists to keep the provider contract honest across both implementations.
 
 The immediate prompt came from OpenRouter's [App Attribution](https://openrouter.ai/docs/app-attribution) docs. OpenRouter creates app pages and rankings from `HTTP-Referer` plus display/category headers. That is valuable, but it is not the HTTP standard for application identity. The risk is adopting OpenRouter's exact header set as if it were universal, then leaking provider-specific headers to direct DeepSeek requests, future OpenAI/Anthropic/Vertex adapters, test servers, or proxies that log unknown fields indefinitely.
 
@@ -26,15 +26,15 @@ The immediate prompt came from OpenRouter's [App Attribution](https://openrouter
 
 Provider request attribution is mandatory at the LLM adapter boundary, using the standard `User-Agent` header only. The rule: every product LLM adapter sends a static, non-secret application identity on every provider HTTP request, and every adapter has tests proving that `User-Agent` reaches the wire (a mock server asserting received headers; for a library-backed adapter, the library's header hook feeding the same mock-server assertion).
 
-Do **not** implement OpenRouter app attribution in this Agent Note. `HTTP-Referer`, `X-OpenRouter-Title`, `X-Title`, and `X-OpenRouter-Categories` are OpenRouter-specific product-surface headers, not provider-neutral model-request attribution. They can be proposed later by an OpenRouter adapter or explicit OpenRouter mode, with its own privacy/product decision, tests, and docs. Until then, even requests pointed at OpenRouter send only the shared `User-Agent` attribution from this Agent Note.
+OpenRouter app attribution is deliberately not implemented. `HTTP-Referer`, `X-OpenRouter-Title`, `X-Title`, and `X-OpenRouter-Categories` are OpenRouter-specific product-surface headers, not provider-neutral model-request attribution. They can be proposed later by an OpenRouter adapter or explicit OpenRouter mode, with its own privacy/product decision, tests, and docs. Until then, even requests pointed at OpenRouter send only the shared `User-Agent` attribution from this decision.
 
-The provider-neutral identity is owned by `dsh-llm` (`packages/llm/llm/src/attribution.ts`), not by individual adapters. `AppIdentity` contains only public product facts needed to build `User-Agent`, and the default `APP_IDENTITY` settles the values the proposal left open:
+The provider-neutral identity is owned by `dsh-llm` (`packages/llm/llm/src/attribution.ts`), not by individual adapters. `AppIdentity` contains only public product facts needed to build `User-Agent`, and the default `APP_IDENTITY` values:
 
 - product token for `User-Agent`: `deepseek-harness` (continuity with the pre-Agent Note wire value and the repo/org identity)
 - version: read from the owning package's manifest via `createRequire`, never a hand-copied constant
 - app URL: `https://github.com/deepseek-ai/deepseek-harness-sdk` - the planned public home, which must exist before release
 
-The default is mandatory and non-empty. White-label deployments pass their own `AppIdentity` to `attributionHeaders(identity)` - the override seam is the function parameter, with no deployment config plumbing until a consumer needs it - and omission falls back to the harness default rather than suppressing attribution. There is no per-request API for the model, user prompt, session id, cwd, user email, API key owner, or local machine identity to influence these fields.
+The default is mandatory and non-empty. White-label deployments pass their own `AppIdentity` to `attributionHeaders(identity)` - the override hook is the function parameter, with no deployment config plumbing until a consumer needs it - and omission falls back to the harness default rather than suppressing attribution. There is no per-request API for the model, user prompt, session id, cwd, user email, API key owner, or local machine identity to influence these fields.
 
 Wire mapping (`attributionHeaders`; header names lowercase in code - HTTP field names are case-insensitive on the wire):
 
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Wire mapping (`attributionHeaders`; header names lowercase in code - HTTP field
 |---|---|
 | All HTTP-based adapters | `User-Agent: {product}/{version} (+{url})` - the parenthesized `+url` comment stays within RFC 9110's conservative product/comment syntax. |
 | Direct DeepSeek endpoint | `User-Agent`; do not send OpenRouter-only headers unless DeepSeek documents an equivalent contract. |
-| OpenRouter endpoints | `User-Agent` only for now. Do not send `HTTP-Referer`, `X-OpenRouter-Title`, `X-Title`, or `X-OpenRouter-Categories` under this Agent Note. |
+| OpenRouter endpoints | `User-Agent` only for now. Do not send `HTTP-Referer`, `X-OpenRouter-Title`, `X-Title`, or `X-OpenRouter-Categories` under this decision. |
 | Future providers | `User-Agent` only unless a later provider-specific Agent Note accepts additional headers. Do not reuse `HTTP-Referer` by analogy. |
 
 Endpoint detection is not part of this Agent Note because no endpoint-specific mapping is accepted here. If OpenRouter support lands later, detection must be explicit: either a dedicated OpenRouter provider package or an explicit `provider: 'openrouter'` / `attributionTarget: 'openrouter'` config, not arbitrary path fragments or model names.
@@ -51,17 +51,17 @@ Endpoint detection is not part of this Agent Note because no endpoint-specific m
 
 The landed contract:
 
-- `dsh-llm` documents the mandatory `User-Agent` attribution contract for `LlmAdapter` authors (`LlmAdapter` JSDoc, package README, and the adapter-contract section of `docs/core-data-structures/llm-streaming.md`).
+- `dsh-llm` documents the mandatory `User-Agent` attribution contract for `LlmAdapter` authors (`LlmAdapter` JSDoc, package README, and the adapter-contract section of `docs/subsystems/llm-streaming.md`).
 - A shared helper (`attributionHeaders` / `userAgent`) constructs the app identity and the standard `User-Agent` value from package metadata, so adapters do not hand-copy version constants.
 - `dsh-llm-deepseek` sends the shared `User-Agent` on every request and its mock-server suite asserts the exact value.
 - `dsh-llm-pi-ai` sends the same `User-Agent` through pi-ai's `StreamOptions.headers` hook and its mock-server suite asserts the exact value.
-- No adapter sends OpenRouter-specific attribution headers (`HTTP-Referer`, `X-OpenRouter-Title`, `X-Title`, `X-OpenRouter-Categories`) as part of this Agent Note.
+- No adapter sends OpenRouter-specific attribution headers (`HTTP-Referer`, `X-OpenRouter-Title`, `X-Title`, `X-OpenRouter-Categories`) as part of this decision.
 - No app-attribution field carries secrets, local paths, session ids, prompt text, model output, user email, or per-user stable identifiers.
 - The adapter READMEs state the `User-Agent` attribution policy and explicitly avoid documenting OpenRouter app attribution as implemented behavior.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
-**OpenRouter app attribution now.** Rejected for this Agent Note. Sending `HTTP-Referer` plus `X-OpenRouter-Title` would satisfy OpenRouter rankings, but those headers are a provider-specific product feature, not the provider-neutral model-request attribution this Agent Note is trying to standardize. Supporting them should be an explicit OpenRouter adapter/mode decision later, not hidden inside the first shared attribution helper.
+**OpenRouter app attribution now.** Rejected for this decision. Sending `HTTP-Referer` plus `X-OpenRouter-Title` would satisfy OpenRouter rankings, but those headers are a provider-specific product feature, not the provider-neutral model-request attribution this decision standardizes. Supporting them should be an explicit OpenRouter adapter/mode decision later, not hidden inside the first shared attribution helper.
 
 **OpenRouter headers everywhere.** Rejected. It would treat a custom OpenRouter contract as a universal standard and send fields with misleading semantics to providers that did not ask for them. It also risks using `HTTP-Referer` as a generic app URL field even though standard HTTP already has `User-Agent` for product identity and `Referer` for a different browsing-context concept.
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.zh.md

@@ -6,64 +6,64 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 问题
 
-LLM（大语言模型）提供方请求应当标识发出请求的产品。这对提供方侧的技术支持、滥用调查、兼容性调试和流量分析都有价值。在本 Agent Note 之前，harness 只做了部分工作：手写的 DeepSeek 适配器发送了一个手动复制的 `User-Agent` 常量（`packages/llm/llm-deepseek/src/adapter.ts`），而基于 pi-ai 的孪生适配器则完全不发送 harness 自有的头部（`packages/llm/llm-pi-ai/src/adapter.ts`）。因此新适配器可以悄无声息地省略归属标识，而基于库的适配器也可能与手写适配器产生偏差——尽管[孪生适配器 Agent Note](2026-06-13-twin-llm-adapters.md) 的存在正是为了让两种实现在提供方 seam 上保持诚实。
+LLM（大语言模型）提供方请求应当标识发出请求的产品。这对提供方侧的技术支持、滥用调查、兼容性调试和流量分析都有价值。在本 Agent Note 之前，harness 只做了部分工作：手写的 DeepSeek 适配器发送了一个手动复制的 `User-Agent` 常量（`packages/llm/llm-deepseek/src/adapter.ts`），而基于 pi-ai 的孪生适配器则完全不发送 harness 自有的头部（`packages/llm/llm-pi-ai/src/adapter.ts`）。因此新适配器可以悄无声息地省略归属标识，而基于库的适配器也可能与手写适配器产生偏差——尽管[孪生适配器 Agent Note](2026-06-13-twin-llm-adapters.md) 的存在正是为了让两种实现在提供方约定上保持诚实。
 
 直接触发因素来自 OpenRouter 的[应用归属](https://openrouter.ai/docs/app-attribution)文档。OpenRouter 根据 `HTTP-Referer` 加上 display/category 头部来创建应用页面和排名。这有价值，但它不是 HTTP 标准中的应用身份机制。风险在于：把 OpenRouter 的精确头部集当作通用标准来采纳，然后将提供方特有的头部泄漏到直连 DeepSeek 的请求、未来的 OpenAI/Anthropic/Vertex 适配器、测试服务器或无限期记录未知字段的代理中。
 
 ## 调研
 
-- **OpenRouter 的机制是提供方特有的。** 其当前文档说明应用归属通过 `HTTP-Referer`（必需）、`X-OpenRouter-Title` 和 `X-OpenRouter-Categories` 来追踪；`X-Title` 仅为向后兼容而接受。其 API 参考称这些头部为可选，并说它们使应用在 OpenRouter 上可被发现。这是一份具体的 OpenRouter 契约，而非 IETF 或 OpenAI 兼容 API 标准。
-- **在 agent 工具生态中，`HTTP-Referer` 是一种 OpenRouter 感知的约定，而非通用 agent 约定。** 它足够常见，以至于 OpenRouter SDK 和示例直接暴露它，面向 OpenRouter 的框架通常需要一种方式来透传它。但 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）等 agent 协议在自己的 initialize 消息中协商名称、版本和能力，而模型提供方请求仍需 HTTP 层面的身份标识。因此「在 agent 世界中被接受」意味着「被 OpenRouter 集成所识别」，而非「可跨 agent 运行时或提供方移植」。
-- **编程 agent 在 `User-Agent` 中标识产品和版本。** 公开实现在环境细节和提供方特有的附加头部上各有不同，但产品身份是共同契约；不存在通用的精确格式。
+- **OpenRouter 的机制是提供方特有的。** 其当前文档说明应用归属通过 `HTTP-Referer`（必需）、`X-OpenRouter-Title` 和 `X-OpenRouter-Categories` 来追踪；`X-Title` 仅为向后兼容而接受。其 API 参考称这些头部为可选，并说它们使应用在 OpenRouter 上可被发现。这是一项具体的 OpenRouter 惯例，而非 IETF 或 OpenAI 兼容 API 标准。
+- **在 agent 工具生态中，`HTTP-Referer` 是一种 OpenRouter 感知的惯例，而非通用 agent 惯例。** 它足够常见，以至于 OpenRouter SDK 和示例直接暴露它，面向 OpenRouter 的框架通常需要一种方式来透传它。但 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）等 agent 协议在自己的 initialize 消息中协商名称、版本和能力，而模型提供方请求仍需 HTTP 层面的身份标识。因此「在 agent 世界中被接受」意味着「被 OpenRouter 集成所识别」，而非「可跨 agent 运行时或提供方移植」。
+- **编程 agent 在 `User-Agent` 中标识产品和版本。** 公开实现在环境细节和提供方特有的附加头部上各有不同，但产品身份是共同惯例；不存在通用的精确格式。
 - **标准化的通用客户端身份头部是 `User-Agent`。** RFC 9110 第 10.1.5 节将 `User-Agent` 定义为用户代理软件身份，说明它用于互操作性报告和分析，并说用户代理应当在每个请求中发送它（除非被配置为不发送）。这是唯一直接对应「哪个产品在发出此 HTTP 请求」的标准头部。
 - **`Referer` 是标准的，但 OpenRouter 的 `HTTP-Referer` 不是标准字段。** RFC 9110 第 10.1.3 节将 `Referer` 定义为获取目标 URI 的来源 URI，并用大量篇幅讨论隐私限制。OpenRouter 则要求 `HTTP-Referer`，将其用作应用 URL 标识符。该名称和含义是 OpenRouter 特有的，尽管它形似标准 `Referer` 头部的 CGI 环境变量形式。
 - **`From` 是标准的，但不适合作为强制默认值。** RFC 9110 第 10.1.2 节将 `From` 定义为负责用户代理的人的电子邮件地址。机器人代理应当发送它以便服务器联系运营者，但非机器人代理出于隐私和安全策略考虑不应在未经用户显式配置的情况下发送。harness 可以后续支持运营者联系方式，但不得凭空捏造或全局强制要求。
 - **请求体中的 `user` 或 `metadata` 字段不是应用归属。** 部分模型 API 暴露稳定的终端用户标识符、请求元数据、标签或项目/账户头部。这些对滥用监控、内部计费、仪表盘或链路追踪有用，但它们要么标识的是终端用户而非产品，要么是提供方特有的 body schema，要么不保证能通过 OpenAI 兼容网关透传。它们不能替代静态的应用身份头部。
 - **SDK 遥测头部标识的是 SDK，而非应用。** 官方和第三方 SDK 常发送库/版本头部。这些帮助 SDK 维护者调试其客户端，但除非应用显式提供产品归属层，否则它们不能标识 harness 作为应用。
-- **pi-ai 有原生支持的头部钩子。** `@earendil-works/pi-ai` 的 `StreamOptions.headers` 将调用方头部最后合并（覆盖提供方默认值），因此基于库的适配器无需包装或上游改动即可满足与手写适配器相同的线路契约。mock 服务器测试套件对两个适配器都断言头部到达了线路。
+- **pi-ai 有原生支持的头部钩子。** `@earendil-works/pi-ai` 的 `StreamOptions.headers` 将调用方头部最后合并（覆盖提供方默认值），因此基于库的适配器无需包装或上游改动即可满足与手写适配器相同的线路约定。mock 服务器测试套件对两个适配器都断言头部到达了线路。
 
 ## 决策
 
 在 LLM 适配器边界，提供方请求归属是强制的，且仅使用标准 `User-Agent` 头部。规则：每个产品级 LLM 适配器在每个提供方 HTTP 请求上发送一个静态、非机密的应用身份，且每个适配器都有测试证明 `User-Agent` 到达了线路（mock 服务器断言收到的头部；对于基于库的适配器，通过库的头部钩子馈入同一个 mock 服务器断言）。
 
-本 Agent Note **不**实现 OpenRouter 应用归属。`HTTP-Referer`、`X-OpenRouter-Title`、`X-Title` 和 `X-OpenRouter-Categories` 是 OpenRouter 特有的产品展示头部，不是提供方无关的模型请求归属。它们可以后续由 OpenRouter 适配器或显式 OpenRouter 模式提出，附带自己的隐私/产品决策、测试和文档。在此之前，即使请求指向 OpenRouter，也只发送本 Agent Note 定义的共享 `User-Agent` 归属。
+OpenRouter 应用归属刻意未实现。`HTTP-Referer`、`X-OpenRouter-Title`、`X-Title` 和 `X-OpenRouter-Categories` 是 OpenRouter 特有的产品展示头部，不是提供方无关的模型请求归属。它们可以后续由 OpenRouter 适配器或显式 OpenRouter 模式提出，附带自己的隐私/产品决策、测试和文档。在此之前，即使请求指向 OpenRouter，也只发送本决策定义的共享 `User-Agent` 归属。
 
-提供方无关的身份由 `dsh-llm`（`packages/llm/llm/src/attribution.ts`）拥有，而非各适配器。`AppIdentity` 仅包含构建 `User-Agent` 所需的公开产品事实，默认的 `APP_IDENTITY` 确定了提案中留待决定的值：
+提供方无关的身份由 `dsh-llm`（`packages/llm/llm/src/attribution.ts`）拥有，而非各适配器。`AppIdentity` 仅包含构建 `User-Agent` 所需的公开产品事实，默认的 `APP_IDENTITY` 取值如下：
 
 - `User-Agent` 的产品 token：`deepseek-harness`（与 Agent Note 之前的线路值及仓库/组织身份保持连续性）
 - 版本：通过 `createRequire` 从所属包的 manifest（元数据清单）读取，绝不手动复制常量
 - 应用 URL：`https://github.com/deepseek-ai/deepseek-harness-sdk`——计划中的公开主页，且必须在发布前实际存在
 
-默认值是强制的且非空。白标部署通过向 `attributionHeaders(identity)` 传入自己的 `AppIdentity` 来覆盖——覆盖 seam 就是函数参数，在有消费方需要之前不做部署配置管道——省略时回退到 harness 默认值而非抑制归属。没有逐请求 API 允许模型、用户提示词、会话 id、cwd、用户邮箱、API key 所有者或本地机器身份影响这些字段。
+默认值是强制的且非空。白标部署通过向 `attributionHeaders(identity)` 传入自己的 `AppIdentity` 来覆盖——覆盖钩子就是函数参数，在有消费方需要之前不做部署配置管道——省略时回退到 harness 默认值而非抑制归属。没有逐请求 API 允许模型、用户提示词、会话 id、cwd、用户邮箱、API key 所有者或本地机器身份影响这些字段。
 
 线路映射（`attributionHeaders`；代码中头部名称小写——HTTP 字段名在线路上不区分大小写）：
 
 | 目标 | 映射 |
 |---|---|
 | 所有基于 HTTP 的适配器 | `User-Agent: {product}/{version} (+{url})`——括号中的 `+url` 注释符合 RFC 9110 保守的 product/comment 语法。 |
-| 直连 DeepSeek 端点 | `User-Agent`；除非 DeepSeek 文档化了等效契约，否则不发送 OpenRouter 特有头部。 |
-| OpenRouter 端点 | 目前仅 `User-Agent`。本 Agent Note 下不发送 `HTTP-Referer`、`X-OpenRouter-Title`、`X-Title` 或 `X-OpenRouter-Categories`。 |
+| 直连 DeepSeek 端点 | `User-Agent`；除非 DeepSeek 文档化了等效约定，否则不发送 OpenRouter 特有头部。 |
+| OpenRouter 端点 | 目前仅 `User-Agent`。本决策下不发送 `HTTP-Referer`、`X-OpenRouter-Title`、`X-Title` 或 `X-OpenRouter-Categories`。 |
 | 未来提供方 | 仅 `User-Agent`，除非后续提供方特有的 Agent Note 接受额外头部。不要类比复用 `HTTP-Referer`。 |
 
 端点检测不在本 Agent Note 范围内，因为此处不接受任何端点特有的映射。如果后续支持 OpenRouter，检测必须是显式的：要么是专门的 OpenRouter 提供方包，要么是显式的 `provider: 'openrouter'` / `attributionTarget: 'openrouter'` 配置，而非任意路径片段或模型名称。
 
 ## 验证
 
-已落地的契约：
+已落地的约定：
 
-- `dsh-llm` 为 `LlmAdapter` 作者文档化了强制的 `User-Agent` 归属契约（`LlmAdapter` JSDoc、包 README，以及 `docs/core-data-structures/llm-streaming.md` 的适配器契约（adapter contract）章节）。
+- `dsh-llm` 为 `LlmAdapter` 作者文档化了强制的 `User-Agent` 归属约定（`LlmAdapter` JSDoc、包 README，以及 `docs/subsystems/llm-streaming.md` 的适配器约定（adapter contract）章节）。
 - 共享辅助函数（`attributionHeaders` / `userAgent`）从包元数据构建应用身份和标准 `User-Agent` 值，适配器无需手动复制版本常量。
 - `dsh-llm-deepseek` 在每个请求上发送共享的 `User-Agent`，其 mock 服务器套件断言精确值。
 - `dsh-llm-pi-ai` 通过 pi-ai 的 `StreamOptions.headers` 钩子发送相同的 `User-Agent`，其 mock 服务器套件断言精确值。
-- 本 Agent Note 下没有适配器发送 OpenRouter 特有的归属头部（`HTTP-Referer`、`X-OpenRouter-Title`、`X-Title`、`X-OpenRouter-Categories`）。
+- 本决策下没有适配器发送 OpenRouter 特有的归属头部（`HTTP-Referer`、`X-OpenRouter-Title`、`X-Title`、`X-OpenRouter-Categories`）。
 - 没有应用归属字段携带机密、本地路径、会话 id、提示词文本、模型输出、用户邮箱或逐用户的稳定标识符。
 - 适配器 README 声明了 `User-Agent` 归属策略，并明确避免将 OpenRouter 应用归属记录为已实现的行为。
 
 ## 曾考虑的替代方案
 
-**现在就实现 OpenRouter 应用归属。** 本 Agent Note 否决。发送 `HTTP-Referer` 加 `X-OpenRouter-Title` 可以满足 OpenRouter 排名，但这些头部是提供方特有的产品功能，不是本 Agent Note 试图标准化的提供方无关的模型请求归属。支持它们应当是后续显式的 OpenRouter 适配器/模式决策，而非隐藏在首个共享归属辅助函数中。
+**现在就实现 OpenRouter 应用归属。** 本决策否决。发送 `HTTP-Referer` 加 `X-OpenRouter-Title` 可以满足 OpenRouter 排名，但这些头部是提供方特有的产品功能，不是本决策所标准化的提供方无关的模型请求归属。支持它们应当是后续显式的 OpenRouter 适配器/模式决策，而非隐藏在首个共享归属辅助函数中。
 
-**向所有提供方发送 OpenRouter 头部。** 否决。这会把一份自定义的 OpenRouter 契约当作通用标准，并向未要求这些字段的提供方发送语义误导的头部。还有风险将 `HTTP-Referer` 当作通用应用 URL 字段使用，尽管标准 HTTP 已有 `User-Agent` 用于产品身份、`Referer` 用于不同的浏览上下文概念。
+**向所有提供方发送 OpenRouter 头部。** 否决。这会把一项自定义的 OpenRouter 惯例当作通用标准，并向未要求这些字段的提供方发送语义误导的头部。还有风险将 `HTTP-Referer` 当作通用应用 URL 字段使用，尽管标准 HTTP 已有 `User-Agent` 用于产品身份、`Referer` 用于不同的浏览上下文概念。
 
 **仅使用提供方账户/项目身份。** 否决。组织/项目头部、API key、云账户和计费项目标识的是谁付费或谁拥有请求，而非哪个应用在发送流量。它们也不暴露公开的应用标题/类别，无法帮助 OpenRouter 等网关构建应用排名。
 
@@ -79,6 +79,6 @@ LLM（大语言模型）提供方请求应当标识发出请求的产品。这
 
 **应用 URL 指向一个尚不存在的仓库。** `deepseek-ai/deepseek-harness-sdk` 是计划中的公开主页；在它创建之前，该 URL 是一个阻塞发布的悬空承诺。
 
-**不同客户端库的头部支持有差异。** 手写适配器直接设置头部；基于 pi-ai 的适配器依赖 pi-ai 继续尊重 `StreamOptions.headers`（最后合并覆盖提供方默认值）。线路级 mock 服务器测试是守卫：如果 pi-ai 升级后不再投递该头部，套件会变红。这对抽象施加了有益的压力：一个无法设置强制头部的提供方适配器不能完整实现 harness 的 LLM 契约。
+**不同客户端库的头部支持有差异。** 手写适配器直接设置头部；基于 pi-ai 的适配器依赖 pi-ai 继续尊重 `StreamOptions.headers`（最后合并覆盖提供方默认值）。线路级 mock 服务器测试是守卫：如果 pi-ai 升级后不再投递该头部，套件会变红。这对抽象施加了有益的压力：一个无法设置强制头部的提供方适配器不能完整实现 harness 的 LLM 约定。
 
 **OpenRouter 排名尚未受益。** `User-Agent` 是提供方无关的 HTTP 身份的正确基线，但它不会创建 OpenRouter 应用页面或排名，因为 OpenRouter 要求 `HTTP-Referer` 来实现该产品功能。这是有意为之：公开应用市场参与是一个独立的产品决策，不是强制请求归属的前提。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.md
-2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.md: b705236690859961ed69b307dbb59ebefcbd65ac
-2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.zh.md: e3dc836004bf785c6811e4c4014e105266dbaade
+2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.md: ccf04420425555055ce3810d25bf764db17322bb
+2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.zh.md: 73f7d0d9b82c03d41bdc768f22b22316e1bc907f

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.zh.md)
 
 ## Problem
 
-The harness needs model-facing web tools without binding the model contract to one vendor's API shape. Search is the immediate pressure point: supporting both Exa search and Perplexity search from the start — two deliberately different provider shapes (Exa returns a flat `results[]` of `{title, url, highlights, publishedDate}`; Perplexity returns a generated answer plus citations) — is what proves the normalized seam does not just mirror one vendor. Fetch is a separate capability: an anonymous public HTTP(S) fetch backend has transport, security, redirect, decoding, and size-limit concerns that are not the same as provider-backed search.
+The harness needs model-facing web tools without binding the model contract to one vendor's API shape. Search is the immediate pressure point: supporting both Exa search and Perplexity search from the start — two deliberately different provider shapes (Exa returns a flat `results[]` of `{title, url, highlights, publishedDate}`; Perplexity returns a generated answer plus citations) — is what proves the normalized web contract does not just mirror one vendor. Fetch is a separate operation: an anonymous public HTTP(S) fetch backend has transport, security, redirect, decoding, and size-limit concerns that are not the same as provider-backed search.
 
 The model-facing surface must stay stable while backends change. A search provider swap should not change how the model asks for a query, and a fetch implementation swap should not change how the model asks for a URL. Conversely, a provider package should not expose its own model-facing tool schema just because it has extra provider-specific knobs.
 
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ The seam deliberately exposes no observation surface — no registry-change even
 
 ## Package topology
 
-The three-package interface/implementation/consumer split follows bash and filesystem, but the *interface* package is closer to the LLM seam. `LlmService` (`packages/llm/llm/src/index.ts`) is a name-keyed provider registry: `registerAdapter(models, adapter)` stores adapters in a `Map`, returns a disposer, throws `DUPLICATE_ADAPTER` on duplicate keys, and throws `NO_ADAPTER` at resolution time. `ctx.web` follows that registry shape, but has two capability kinds and a richer selection policy (a configured provider id, or auto-select when exactly one usable provider is registered), so the `WebError` an execution throws can explain why a search or fetch capability cannot run.
+The three-package Service Definition / Service provider / Consumer split follows bash and filesystem, but the *interface* package is closer to the LLM seam. `LlmService` (`packages/llm/llm/src/index.ts`) is a name-keyed provider registry: `registerAdapter(models, adapter)` stores adapters in a `Map`, returns a disposer, throws `DUPLICATE_ADAPTER` on duplicate keys, and throws `NO_ADAPTER` at resolution time. `ctx.web` follows that registry shape, but has two capability kinds and a richer selection policy (a configured provider id, or auto-select when exactly one usable provider is registered), so the `WebError` an execution throws can explain why a search or fetch capability cannot run.
 
 The dependency direction mirrors bash and filesystem:
 
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ Tool execution lets these errors flow through `ToolRegistry.execute()`, which al
 
 ## Testing
 
-Each layer is pinned at its own seam: the registry/selection/truncation/abort contract and the `WebError` codes in `dsh-web`; per-provider request/response mapping over recorded fixtures (Perplexity fixtures include URL-only citations so the optional source fields stay honest) plus a self-skipping with-key smoke per real provider; real local-HTTP behavior in `web-fetch-local`; and enablement-driven registration, structured execution errors, and result formatting through the real tool registry in `dsh-tool-web`. A real-Loader smoke guards the two export shapes ([postmortem 0001](../../../../docs/postmortem/0001-acp-default-export-drops-inject.md)): `dsh-web` is a default-exported service, while the providers and `tool-web` are namespace plugins where a stray `export default` would drop `inject`.
+Each layer is pinned at its own boundary: the registry/selection/truncation/abort contract and the `WebError` codes in `dsh-web`; per-provider request/response mapping over recorded fixtures (Perplexity fixtures include URL-only citations so the optional source fields stay honest) plus a self-skipping with-key smoke per real provider; real local-HTTP behavior in `web-fetch-local`; and enablement-driven registration, structured execution errors, and result formatting through the real tool registry in `dsh-tool-web`. A real-Loader smoke guards the two export shapes ([postmortem 0001](../../../../docs/postmortem/0001-acp-default-export-drops-inject.md)): `dsh-web` is a default-exported service, while the providers and `tool-web` are namespace plugins where a stray `export default` would drop `inject`.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ Rejected. Registration order is not a product policy. It can change with config
 
 ### Treat Firecrawl/Exa/Tavily/Parallel extraction as fetch
 
-Rejected for the first version. Those providers often return extracted or summarized content rather than a concrete HTTP response. If the product needs extraction, design `web_extract` or deliberately widen the fetch seam later.
+Rejected for the first version. Those providers often return extracted or summarized content rather than a concrete HTTP response. If the product needs extraction, design `web_extract` or deliberately widen the fetch operation later.
 
 ### Mirror Claude Code's `url + prompt` WebFetch shape
 
@@ -327,10 +327,10 @@ Rejected for the seam. `prompt` turns fetch into LLM summarization and couples p
 - SSRF / private-network protection for `web_fetch`: block private, loopback, link-local, multicast, and otherwise non-public destinations so `web_fetch` is not an SSRF primitive. Doing it correctly is more than a URL-string check — it needs DNS-resolve-then-connect-to-the-validated-IP (to defeat DNS rebinding / TOCTOU), per-hop re-validation across redirects, and IPv6 edge handling (private ranges, IPv4-mapped addresses). Neither reference implementation surveyed does IP-level blocking (OpenCode does a prefix check then fetches; Claude Code relies on a centralized hostname blocklist plus a "private URLs will fail" prompt), so there is no implementation to copy and this is the harness's only SSRF defense — it warrants its own focused design/spike. Until it lands, `web_fetch` must only be enabled in deployments that cannot reach sensitive internal targets.
 - A `pdf` `WebFetchBody` kind: the `local-http` provider decodes text-extractable PDFs (best-effort, capped, `truncated`) into a `{ kind: 'pdf'; content; pageCount? }` arm, and `tool-web` renders it. This is fetch, not `web_extract` — PDF retrieval is a concrete HTTP 200 plus deterministic local decoding, not provider-side extraction of a non-HTTP resource. Adding it is a coordinated change across `dsh-web` (declare the arm), the provider (decode + narrow "binary rejection" to "reject binary except text-extractable PDF"; scanned/image PDFs needing OCR stay out of scope), and `tool-web` (render). The closed `WebFetchBody` union makes the consumer side fail to compile until the new arm is handled.
 - Provider-backed extraction as a separate `web_extract` capability, rather than widening `web_fetch` silently.
-- Permission policy integration once the deferred permission system lands.
+- Permission policy integration: the permission system now exists ([sandbox and approval](../feature/2026-07-06-sandbox.md), [web permission presets](../feature/2026-07-23-web-permission-and-approval.md)) but bundles only sandbox mode and approval policy; web permission policy remains unintegrated.
 - Provider-neutral search controls beyond `query` and `maxResults`, once Exa and Perplexity can both honor them honestly.
 
 ## Open questions
 
 - Should product app packages probe web configuration at startup (treating `WEB_PROVIDER_CONFIGURED_MISSING`, `WEB_PROVIDER_CONFIGURED_UNAVAILABLE`, and `WEB_PROVIDER_AMBIGUOUS` as fatal when web is explicitly configured), or leave misconfiguration to surface at the first execution?
-- Where should permission policy for public web access live once the deferred permission system lands: a dedicated web permission plugin on `tools/execute`, provider config, or both?
+- Where should permission policy for public web access live in the shipped permission system ([sandbox and approval](../feature/2026-07-06-sandbox.md), [web permission presets](../feature/2026-07-23-web-permission-and-approval.md)): a dedicated web permission plugin on `tools/execute`, provider config, or both?

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.zh.md

@@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 问题
 
-harness 需要面向模型的 web 工具，但不能将模型契约绑定到某一家厂商的 API 形状上。搜索是当前的压力点：从一开始就同时支持 Exa 搜索和 Perplexity 搜索——两种刻意不同的提供方形状（Exa 返回扁平的 `results[]`，每项包含 `{title, url, highlights, publishedDate}`；Perplexity 返回一段生成式回答加引用列表）——正是用来证明归一化的 seam 并非只是镜像某一家厂商。Fetch 是另一项独立能力：匿名公开 HTTP(S) fetch 后端涉及传输、安全、重定向、解码和大小限制等关注点，与提供方支撑的搜索并不相同。
+harness 需要面向模型的 web 工具，但不能将模型约定绑定到某一家厂商的 API 形状上。搜索是当前的压力点：从一开始就同时支持 Exa 搜索和 Perplexity 搜索——两种刻意不同的提供方形状（Exa 返回扁平的 `results[]`，每项包含 `{title, url, highlights, publishedDate}`；Perplexity 返回一段生成式回答加引用列表）——正是用来证明归一化的 web 约定并非只是镜像某一家厂商。Fetch 是另一项独立操作：匿名公开 HTTP(S) fetch 后端涉及传输、安全、重定向、解码和大小限制等关注点，与提供方支撑的搜索并不相同。
 
 面向模型的接口必须保持稳定，而后端可以更换。更换搜索提供方不应改变模型发起查询的方式；更换 fetch 实现不应改变模型请求 URL 的方式。反过来，提供方包也不应仅仅因为自己有额外的提供方特有旋钮就暴露自己的面向模型工具 schema。
 
-如果把搜索和 fetch 直接放进 `dsh-tool-web`，面向模型的工具就要同时承担提供方选择、后端请求映射、传输策略、结果归一化、提示词引导、展示和 schema 注册。让每个提供方注册自己的工具则有相反的问题：工具的可用性、名称、描述和参数将取决于恰好加载了哪些提供方包，提供方特有字段会泄漏到模型契约中。
+如果把搜索和 fetch 直接放进 `dsh-tool-web`，面向模型的工具就要同时承担提供方选择、后端请求映射、传输策略、结果归一化、提示词引导、展示和 schema 注册。让每个提供方注册自己的工具则有相反的问题：工具的可用性、名称、描述和参数将取决于恰好加载了哪些提供方包，提供方特有字段会泄漏到模型约定中。
 
 还有一个提供方选择的问题。现有的 `tool-bash` 和 `tool-fs` 可以依赖 Cordis 的 `inject`，因为只有一个后端服务键。Web 有两项独立能力（`search` 和 `fetch`），每项能力可能有多个提供方。`inject: ['web']` 能证明 seam 存在，但不能证明存在可用的搜索或 fetch 提供方，也无法定义多个提供方注册时谁胜出。
 
@@ -32,13 +32,13 @@ Web 访问是一个一等能力 seam，遵循[能力 seam Agent Note](2026-06-13
 - 工具绝不会仅仅因为其选定的提供方缺失、配置错误、缺少凭证、存在歧义或暂时不可用就被注销。
 - 提供方在执行时解析，当选定的能力无法运行时返回结构化的 `WebError`。
 
-这使模型 schema 保持稳定，而不将插件加载顺序、凭证状态或 HMR（热模块替换）时序纳入面向模型的契约。如果 web 搜索已启用但不存在可用的搜索提供方，`web_search` 仍然可见，执行时以结构化的 `WebError`（如 `WEB_PROVIDER_UNAVAILABLE` 或 `WEB_PROVIDER_CONFIGURED_UNAVAILABLE`）失败。如果某个提供方在 `dsh-tool-web` 之后出现，下一次执行即可使用它而无需更改 schema。如果某个提供方在调用过程中消失，执行以结构化的 `WebError` 失败，而不是静默选择另一个提供方或回退到 `UNKNOWN_TOOL`。
+这使模型 schema 保持稳定，而不将插件加载顺序、凭证状态或 HMR（热模块替换）时序纳入面向模型的约定。如果 web 搜索已启用但不存在可用的搜索提供方，`web_search` 仍然可见，执行时以结构化的 `WebError`（如 `WEB_PROVIDER_UNAVAILABLE` 或 `WEB_PROVIDER_CONFIGURED_UNAVAILABLE`）失败。如果某个提供方在 `dsh-tool-web` 之后出现，下一次执行即可使用它而无需更改 schema。如果某个提供方在调用过程中消失，执行以结构化的 `WebError` 失败，而不是静默选择另一个提供方或回退到 `UNKNOWN_TOOL`。
 
 该 seam 刻意不暴露任何观察面——没有注册表变更事件，也没有聚合的能力状态查询。不可用性是调用方通过执行观察到的事实：`search()`/`fetch()` 在调用时解析提供方，并抛出命名了失败原因的结构化 `WebError`。[观察面 Agent Note](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-drop-unconsumed-web-observation-surface.md) 记录了这一判断：基于调用的派生选择与基于启用的注册使得没有消费方需要变更信号或独立于执行和错误路由的可用性探测；未来的提供方状态面板会重新引入它实际消费的最小信号或查询。
 
 ## 包拓扑
 
-由三个包构成的接口/实现/消费方拆分沿用 bash 和 filesystem 的模式，但*接口*包更接近 LLM（大语言模型） seam。`LlmService`（`packages/llm/llm/src/index.ts`）是一个按名称键控的提供方注册表：`registerAdapter(models, adapter)` 将适配器存入 `Map`、返回 disposer、对重复键抛出 `DUPLICATE_ADAPTER`、在解析时抛出 `NO_ADAPTER`。`ctx.web` 沿用该注册表形状，但有两种能力类别和更丰富的选择策略（配置的提供方 id，或在恰好只有一个可用提供方注册时自动选择），因此执行时抛出的 `WebError` 能解释搜索或 fetch 能力为何无法运行。
+由三个包构成的 Service Definition / Service provider / Consumer 拆分沿用 bash 和 filesystem 的模式，但*接口*包更接近 LLM（大语言模型） seam。`LlmService`（`packages/llm/llm/src/index.ts`）是一个按名称键控的提供方注册表：`registerAdapter(models, adapter)` 将适配器存入 `Map`、返回 disposer、对重复键抛出 `DUPLICATE_ADAPTER`、在解析时抛出 `NO_ADAPTER`。`ctx.web` 沿用该注册表形状，但有两种能力类别和更丰富的选择策略（配置的提供方 id，或在恰好只有一个可用提供方注册时自动选择），因此执行时抛出的 `WebError` 能解释搜索或 fetch 能力为何无法运行。
 
 依赖方向与 bash 和 filesystem 一致：
 
@@ -66,13 +66,13 @@ flowchart LR
   toolWeb -->|ctx.tools.register| webFetch["tool: web_fetch"]
 ```
 
-`@deepseek-ai/dsh-web` 仅依赖 Cordis 和底层 harness 支持。它声明 `ctx.web`、提供方接口、请求/结果类型、提供方可用性契约和错误码。它不导入工具、agent、会话、LLM 或提供方包。
+`@deepseek-ai/dsh-web` 仅依赖 Cordis 和底层 harness 支持。它声明 `ctx.web`、提供方接口、请求/结果类型、提供方可用性约定和错误码。它不导入工具、agent、会话、LLM 或提供方包。
 
 提供方包仅依赖 `dsh-web` 和 Cordis。它们拥有凭证、端点、协议格式映射、解析和 `WebError` 转换，使用平台 `fetch`。每个提供方注入共享服务并注册后端；只有 `dsh-web` 拥有 `ctx.web` 键。提供方私有的协议形状不会产生对 `ctx.llm` 或 Cordis HTTP 服务的依赖。
 
 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-web` 依赖 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-web`、`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tools`、`@deepseek-ai/dsh-system-prompt` 和 Cordis。它从不导入具体的提供方包。
 
-## `ctx.web` 契约
+## `ctx.web` 约定
 
 `ctx.web` 是一个提供方注册表加上一个带提供方选择的执行面。注册表部分与 `LlmService` 保持接近：每种能力类别一个 `Map<id, provider>`，`registerSearchProvider`/`registerFetchProvider` 方法返回 disposer，重复 id 抛出 `WebError`，执行时解析在选定提供方缺失或不可用时抛出异常。权威签名见 `packages/web/web/src/types.ts`；seam 的形状：
 
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ SSRF/私有网络防护（阻断私有、回环、链路本地、多播及其他
 
 ## 测试
 
-每一层在自己的 seam 处固定：`dsh-web` 中的注册/选择/截断/abort 契约与 `WebError` 码；每个提供方基于录制的 fixture（测试前置数据）的请求/响应映射（Perplexity fixture 包含纯 URL 引用，以保持可选 source 字段的诚实性），加上每个真实提供方的自跳过带密钥冒烟测试；`web-fetch-local` 中的真实本地 HTTP 行为；`dsh-tool-web` 中通过真实工具注册表的启用驱动注册、结构化执行错误和结果格式化。一个真实 Loader 冒烟测试守护两种导出形状（[事故复盘（postmortem） 0001](../../../../docs/postmortem/0001-acp-default-export-drops-inject.md)）：`dsh-web` 是默认导出的服务，而提供方和 `tool-web` 是命名空间插件，误加 `export default` 会丢失 `inject`。
+每一层在自己的边界处固定：`dsh-web` 中的注册/选择/截断/abort 约定与 `WebError` 码；每个提供方基于录制的 fixture（测试前置数据）的请求/响应映射（Perplexity fixture 包含纯 URL 引用，以保持可选 source 字段的诚实性），加上每个真实提供方的自跳过带密钥冒烟测试；`web-fetch-local` 中的真实本地 HTTP 行为；`dsh-tool-web` 中通过真实工具注册表的启用驱动注册、结构化执行错误和结果格式化。一个真实 Loader 冒烟测试守护两种导出形状（[事故复盘（postmortem） 0001](../../../../docs/postmortem/0001-acp-default-export-drops-inject.md)）：`dsh-web` 是默认导出的服务，而提供方和 `tool-web` 是命名空间插件，误加 `export default` 会丢失 `inject`。
 
 ## 曾考虑的替代方案
 
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ SSRF/私有网络防护（阻断私有、回环、链路本地、多播及其他
 
 ### 将 Firecrawl/Exa/Tavily/Parallel 提取视为 fetch
 
-在第一版中否决。这些提供方通常返回提取或摘要后的内容，而非具体的 HTTP 响应。如果产品需要提取，日后设计 `web_extract` 或刻意扩展 fetch seam。
+在第一版中否决。这些提供方通常返回提取或摘要后的内容，而非具体的 HTTP 响应。如果产品需要提取，日后设计 `web_extract` 或刻意扩展 fetch 操作。
 
 ### 镜像 Claude Code 的 `url + prompt` WebFetch 形状
 
@@ -322,15 +322,17 @@ SSRF/私有网络防护（阻断私有、回环、链路本地、多播及其他
 
 **大量 web 内容可能损害上下文质量。** 提供方强制执行字节/字符上限并报告 `truncated`；`tool-web` 格式化有界的模型输出，附带清晰的继续或后续引导。
 
+<a id="deferred-work"></a>
+
 ## 推迟工作
 
 - `web_fetch` 的 SSRF/私有网络防护：阻断私有、回环、链路本地、多播及其他非公开目的地，使 `web_fetch` 不再是 SSRF 原语。正确实现不仅仅是 URL 字符串检查——需要先 DNS 解析再连接到已验证的 IP（防御 DNS rebinding/TOCTOU）、跨重定向的每跳重新验证，以及 IPv6 边缘处理（私有范围、IPv4 映射地址）。所调研的参考实现均未做 IP 级阻断（OpenCode 做前缀检查后直接 fetch；Claude Code 依赖集中式主机名黑名单加「私有 URL 会失败」的提示词），因此没有可复制的实现，且这是 harness 唯一的 SSRF 防线——值得一次专门的设计/spike。在其落地之前，`web_fetch` 只能在无法触达敏感内部目标的部署中启用。
 - `pdf` `WebFetchBody` 类别：`local-http` 提供方将可文本提取的 PDF 解码（尽力而为、有上限、`truncated`）为 `{ kind: 'pdf'; content; pageCount? }` 分支，`tool-web` 渲染它。这是 fetch 而非 `web_extract`——PDF 获取是具体的 HTTP 200 加确定性的本地解码，不是提供方侧对非 HTTP 资源的提取。添加它是跨 `dsh-web`（声明分支）、提供方（解码 + 将「二进制拒绝」收窄为「拒绝二进制，但可文本提取的 PDF 除外」；需要 OCR 的扫描/图片 PDF 不在范围内）和 `tool-web`（渲染）的协调变更。封闭的 `WebFetchBody` 联合类型使消费方在新分支被处理之前编译失败。
 - 提供方支撑的提取作为独立的 `web_extract` 能力，而非静默扩展 `web_fetch`。
-- 推迟的权限系统落地后的权限策略集成。
+- 权限策略集成：权限系统现已存在（[沙箱与审批](../feature/2026-07-06-sandbox.md)、[web 权限预设](../feature/2026-07-23-web-permission-and-approval.md)），但只捆绑了沙箱模式与审批策略；web 权限策略仍未集成。
 - `query` 和 `maxResults` 之外的提供方无关搜索控制，待 Exa 和 Perplexity 都能诚实遵守时再添加。
 
 ## 开放问题
 
 - 产品应用包是否应在启动时探测 web 配置（当 web 被显式配置时将 `WEB_PROVIDER_CONFIGURED_MISSING`、`WEB_PROVIDER_CONFIGURED_UNAVAILABLE` 和 `WEB_PROVIDER_AMBIGUOUS` 视为致命错误），还是将配置错误留到首次执行时浮出？
-- 推迟的权限系统落地后，公开 web 访问的权限策略应放在哪里：`tools/execute` 上的专用 web 权限插件、提供方配置，还是两者兼有？
+- 在已交付的权限系统（[沙箱与审批](../feature/2026-07-06-sandbox.md)、[web 权限预设](../feature/2026-07-23-web-permission-and-approval.md)）中，公开 web 访问的权限策略应放在哪里：`tools/execute` 上的专用 web 权限插件、提供方配置，还是两者兼有？

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-26-file-context-as-event-gate.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-26-file-context-as-event-gate.md
-2026-06-26-file-context-as-event-gate.md: 4700222aa2e0f91d9f355495c228e2eb92825f55
-2026-06-26-file-context-as-event-gate.zh.md: e0a3619859c2ab4eb99f7cbf69375f9fe40d10b7
+2026-06-26-file-context-as-event-gate.md: 743c8f150a83f2452cb0ff672860b8462a56f762
+2026-06-26-file-context-as-event-gate.zh.md: cd79b44dd3f3b75c5e5addc5be10c02bd1ce0151

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-26-file-context-as-event-gate.md

@@ -26,21 +26,23 @@ tool          dsh-tool-fs       executor: resolves, reads windows, writes/edits
 policy        dsh-fs-policy  plugin: listens to fs/write-intent +
                                 fs/edit-intent (single-slot waterfall) and fs/observed
                                 (emit) events; adds observed-state + freshness.
-provider seam dsh-fs            ctx.fs: text IO + ATOMIC mutation primitives whose version
+provider contract dsh-fs            ctx.fs: text IO + ATOMIC mutation primitives whose version
                                 guard is OPTIONAL; owns the fs policy event vocabulary
 provider      dsh-fs-local      local implementation of ctx.fs
 ```
 
 The model is additive: bare `ctx.fs` performs atomic, unconstrained text I/O, while `dsh-fs-policy` adds observed state, read-before-edit, and version guards. Removing the policy therefore leaves the tools usable but unconstrained. Shipped agent configs load the policy; the bare mode exists to keep policy optional at the service boundary, not as the normal deployment stance.
 
+The [filesystem absence-observation follow-up](../bug-fix/2026-08-09-filesystem-absence-observation.md) refines the recording payload from a success-only version to explicit present/absent state and requires guarded creation to publish without replacement. The event-gate ownership and no-I/O policy boundary remain unchanged.
+
 `dsh-tool-fs` no longer injects `fileContext`. It injects `fs` and `tools`/`systemPrompt`.
 
 ## The policy is enforced by provider CAS, not by `dsh-fs-policy` stat
 
 `dsh-fs-policy` enforces "you must write/edit based on the version you read" **without ever calling `stat` or comparing versions itself**. It supplies the observed version as the CAS basis and lets the provider's mutation critical section detect staleness:
 
-- "Have you read this file?" is the one thing `dsh-fs-policy` decides locally — a `WeakMap` lookup, no I/O. No record ⇒ `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`.
-- "Is the version you read still current?" is decided **inside `ctx.fs.editText`/`writeText`**, in the same atomic lock that performs the read-match-rename. `dsh-fs-policy` passes `vObserved` as the expectation; the provider raises `FS_STALE_VERSION` if the file has moved on.
+- "What did this owner last observe?" is the one thing `dsh-fs-policy` decides locally — a `WeakMap` lookup, no I/O. No record means unseen; an absent record permits only guarded creation; a present record carries the replacement/edit basis.
+- "Is the version still current, or is the create target still absent?" is decided **inside the provider's atomic mutation boundary**. `dsh-fs-policy` supplies `replaceIfVersion` or `createIfAbsent`; the provider raises `FS_STALE_VERSION` for a moved version and `FS_NOT_OBSERVED` when a guarded create loses to another creator.
 
 This is deliberate. If `dsh-fs-policy` stat-ed and compared versions in its waterfall handler, there would be a TOCTOU gap between that check and the tool's actual write — the file could change in between, so the check would be a false guarantee that the provider's lock has to back up anyway. Putting the version check in the provider's critical section is both race-free and zero extra `stat`. So `dsh-fs-policy` does **no** filesystem I/O; the "must be based on the latest read" guarantee is *realized* by CAS, and `dsh-fs-policy` only chooses the basis (`vObserved`) and gates on prior observation.
 
@@ -68,14 +70,14 @@ The `FsWriteIntent` union itself does not change — the third "unconditional" s
 
 The events live in `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs`, not in `dsh-fs-policy`. This is forced by the decoupling contract: `dsh-tool-fs` is the emitter, so it must reference the event types, and it must keep compiling even though `dsh-fs-policy` no longer provides a method service. `dsh-fs` is the package both `dsh-tool-fs` and `dsh-fs-policy` already depend on, so it is the only home that lets the emitter and the policy listener share a vocabulary without the emitter depending on the policy plugin.
 
-These events carry existing `dsh-fs` vocabulary (`FsTarget`, `FsVersion`, `FsWriteIntent`) plus an opaque actor — not model-facing concepts (no line windows, numbered lines, or rendered footers leak down).
+These events carry existing `dsh-fs` vocabulary (`FsTarget`, `FsVersion`, `FsObservation`, `FsWriteIntent`) plus an opaque actor — not model-facing concepts (no line windows, numbered lines, or rendered footers leak down).
 
 **The two `fs/*` decision events are single-slot, first-wins waterfalls.** `dsh-fs-policy` returns without calling `next()`, so it owns the slot in the default deployment; a listener registered earlier or with `prepend` would replace that policy. Permission, audit, and sandbox concerns remain on the composable `tools/execute` waterfall.
 
-The actor is typed `object` in `dsh-fs` — a pure opaque carrier the provider seam never reads or narrows. The owner-derivation (`actor.agent?.session`) and the `{ agent?: { session? } }` structural shape stay entirely inside `dsh-fs-policy`, which narrows the `object` actor to that shape in its listeners. `dsh-fs` owns the event names and the fs vocabulary; it does NOT own the policy layer's runtime owner structure.
+The actor is typed `object` in `dsh-fs` — a pure opaque carrier the provider contract never reads or narrows. The owner-derivation (`actor.agent?.session`) and the `{ agent?: { session? } }` structural shape stay entirely inside `dsh-fs-policy`, which narrows the `object` actor to that shape in its listeners. `dsh-fs` owns the event names and the fs vocabulary; it does NOT own the policy layer's runtime owner structure.
 
 ```ts
-import type { FsTarget, FsVersion, FsWriteIntent } from '@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs'
+import type { FsObservation, FsTarget, FsVersion, FsWriteIntent } from '@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs'
 
 interface Events {
   /**
@@ -95,14 +97,14 @@ interface Events {
    */
   'fs/edit-intent'(target: FsTarget, actor: object | undefined, next: () => { version: FsVersion } | undefined | Promise<{ version: FsVersion } | undefined>): Promise<{ version: FsVersion } | undefined>
   /**
-   * Record that an actor observed a target at a version, after a successful
-   * read/write/edit. Fire-and-forget (plain emit). Listeners MUST be
+   * Record that an actor observed a target as present at a version or absent.
+   * Fire-and-forget (plain emit). Listeners MUST be
    * synchronous, side-effect-only recorders (`dsh-fs-policy`'s is a WeakMap
    * write); the tool does not guard the emit, so a throwing listener surfaces as
    * the tool's isError result. No listener ⇒ nothing recorded.
    * @mode emit
    */
-  'fs/observed'(target: FsTarget, version: FsVersion, actor: object | undefined): void
+  'fs/observed'(target: FsTarget, observation: FsObservation, actor: object | undefined): void
 }
 ```
 
@@ -110,7 +112,7 @@ The `fs/*` decision events are **unbound waterfalls dispatched by the tool** (li
 
 ## Tool contract (`dsh-tool-fs`)
 
-The tool keeps its model-facing schemas (`read`/`write`/`edit`, byte-for-byte unchanged) and prompt sections. The prompt guidance stays policy-first because a deployment loading the fs tools is expected to also load `dsh-fs-policy`: the model is still told to read before overwriting or editing, and any wording that says the "backend" requires that should be corrected to say the fs-policy plugin requires it. The bare-provider fallback does not change the prompt stance.
+The tool keeps its model-facing schemas (`read`/`write`/`edit`, byte-for-byte unchanged) and prompt sections. The prompt guidance stays policy-first because a deployment loading the fs tools is expected to also load `dsh-fs-policy`: the model is still told to read before overwriting or editing, and that requirement is the fs-policy plugin's, not the backend's. The bare-provider fallback does not change the prompt stance.
 
 `dsh-tool-fs` gains the executor responsibilities relocated from the old `fileContext` method service, including **read rendering** (`read-render.ts`: `buildWindow` + `formatReadOutput`, `READ_MAX_BYTES`, `READ_MAX_LINE_LENGTH`, `FileReadOutcome`/`FileTextLine`, plus `STREAM_MIN_SIZE` in `read.ts`), which is the tool's rendering detail now that the tool owns the read. Those read-rendering types and helpers move into `dsh-tool-fs`; the policy plugin must not remain a type dependency for the tool.
 
@@ -118,25 +120,25 @@ The tool keeps its model-facing schemas (`read`/`write`/`edit`, byte-for-byte un
 
 `stat` budget is minimized by letting the waterfall produce the expectation lazily — the bare default returns `undefined` (no guard) and never stats:
 
-- **read** — one `stat` (type + size routing + version), then `readText`/`streamText`, then `buildWindow`, then an `emit('fs/observed', target, info.version, exec)`. The post-read confirming `stat` from the old `fileContext.read` is dropped; a writer racing between the routing stat and the read can at worst make a *later* guarded edit spuriously `FS_STALE_VERSION` (fail-closed: the model re-reads, never writes against the wrong version, since `editText` re-checks in its lock).
-- **write** — `expectation = await ctx.waterfall('fs/write-intent', target, exec, () => undefined)`, then `ctx.fs.writeText(target, content, expectation)`, then an `emit('fs/observed', target, outcome.version, exec)`. **Zero stat in the tool** with or without `dsh-fs-policy`.
-- **edit** — `expectation = await ctx.waterfall('fs/edit-intent', target, exec, () => undefined)`, then `ctx.fs.editText(target, edit, expectation)`, then an `emit('fs/observed', target, outcome.version, exec)`. **Zero stat in the tool** in both cases: the bare default is `undefined` (unconditional edit), so the tool never stats to manufacture a basis. If the target is absent, the provider reports `FS_STALE_VERSION` even on the unguarded path.
+- **read** — one `stat`; a metadata miss emits `{ kind: 'absent' }` before returning `FS_NOT_FOUND`, while a file routes through `readText`/`streamText`, `buildWindow`, then emits `{ kind: 'present', version: info.version }`. The post-read confirming `stat` from the old `fileContext.read` stays dropped; a writer racing between the routing stat and the read can at worst make a later guarded edit spuriously stale.
+- **write** — `expectation = await ctx.waterfall('fs/write-intent', target, exec, () => undefined)`, then `ctx.fs.writeText(target, content, expectation)`, then emit the present outcome version. **Zero stat in the tool** with or without `dsh-fs-policy`.
+- **edit** — `expectation = await ctx.waterfall('fs/edit-intent', target, exec, () => undefined)`, then `ctx.fs.editText(target, edit, expectation)`, then emit the present outcome version. **Zero stat in the tool** in both cases: the bare default is `undefined` (unconditional edit), so the tool never stats to manufacture a basis. If the target is absent on the bare path, the provider reports `FS_STALE_VERSION`; the policy returns `FS_NOT_FOUND` directly when it already holds an absent observation.
 
 The tool passes `exec` (the tool-execution context) as the `actor` argument on every dispatch, so `dsh-fs-policy` can derive its observed-state owner. The tool does not know whether the policy plugin is present: it always provides the bare default behavior in the `next` thunk, and `dsh-fs-policy` short-circuits the thunk before it runs in the default deployment.
 
-**`fs/observed` fires after a successful operation.** Its listeners must be synchronous, non-throwing recorders; the tool does not guard the plain emit, so a throwing listener would report failure after a mutation already succeeded. Async or fallible observation needs a separate event contract.
+**`fs/observed` fires after a successful operation and after a metadata probe confirms absence.** Its listeners must be synchronous, non-throwing recorders; the tool does not guard the plain emit, so a throwing listener can replace the pending read error or report failure after a mutation already succeeded. Async or fallible observation needs a separate event contract.
 
 ## Policy plugin contract (`dsh-fs-policy`)
 
-`dsh-fs-policy` is a plugin, not a service. It does not register `ctx.fileContext`, has no public method surface, and exposes no `read`/`write`/`edit`/`resolve` methods. It attaches three listeners via `ctx.on()` registrations (each returning a disposer for HMR). It keeps the observed-state `WeakMap<owner, Map<targetKey, { version }>>` and the structural owner derivation (narrowing the event's opaque `object` actor to its own `{ agent?: { session? } }` shape), but does not inject `fs` — every handler operates only on its own `WeakMap`, never on `ctx.fs`.
+`dsh-fs-policy` is a plugin, not a service. It does not register `ctx.fileContext`, has no public method surface, and exposes no `read`/`write`/`edit`/`resolve` methods. It attaches three listeners via `ctx.on()` registrations (each returning a disposer for HMR). It keeps the observed-state `WeakMap<owner, Map<targetKey, FsObservation>>` and the structural owner derivation (narrowing the event's opaque `object` actor to its own `{ agent?: { session? } }` shape), but does not inject `fs` — every handler operates only on its own `WeakMap`, never on `ctx.fs`.
 
-- `fs/write-intent` listener: `prior = getObserved(owner, key)`; return `prior ? { kind: 'replaceIfVersion', version: prior.version } : { kind: 'createIfAbsent' }`. It does NOT call `next()`: it fully owns the single decision slot.
-- `fs/edit-intent` listener: `prior = getObserved(owner, key)`; if no `owner` or no `prior`, throw `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`; else return `{ version: prior.version }`. Also does not call `next()`.
-- `fs/observed` listener: `record(owner, key, version)`.
+- `fs/write-intent` listener: unseen/absent ⇒ `createIfAbsent`; present ⇒ `replaceIfVersion`. It does NOT call `next()`: it fully owns the single decision slot.
+- `fs/edit-intent` listener: unseen ⇒ `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`; absent ⇒ `FS_NOT_FOUND`; present ⇒ its version guard. It does NOT call `next()`.
+- `fs/observed` listener: record the present/absent discriminated value.
 
-An observed-state entry is the **prior-observation record**: a successful `read`, `write`, OR `edit` all emit `fs/observed` and record `{ version }`, so the entry's presence means "this owner has observed this target at this version", not narrowly "has read it". This is what lets a create-then-edit or edit-then-edit sequence work without an intervening re-read: the mutation refreshes the recorded version to its own result, so the next edit's basis is the version it just produced. `FS_NOT_OBSERVED` rejects only an edit with NO prior observation of any kind. The owner is derived structurally from `{ agent?: { session? } }`; disposal drops all state (HMR safety).
+An observed-state entry is the **prior-observation record**, but its discriminant matters. Successful read/write/edit records present at a version, allowing create-then-edit or edit-then-edit without an intervening read. A read/view that confirms absence replaces any old positive version with absent, allowing only a guarded create; a later successful create replaces it with the new present version. Missing entry alone means unseen and produces `FS_NOT_OBSERVED` for edit. The owner is derived structurally from `{ agent?: { session? } }`; disposal drops all state (HMR safety).
 
-`dsh-fs-policy` is now a pure policy/recording plugin with no service surface — it influences the world only through the event seam. That is what removes the method coupling from `dsh-tool-fs`.
+`dsh-fs-policy` is now a pure policy/recording plugin with no service surface — it influences the world only through the event gate. That is what removes the method coupling from `dsh-tool-fs`.
 
 ## Bare-provider behavior (no `dsh-fs-policy`)
 
@@ -154,7 +156,7 @@ This amends — does not reverse — [the split-fs-seam Agent Note](../simplific
 
 ## Verification
 
-Tests pin both paths: without `dsh-fs-policy`, the root tool plugin boots against `dsh-fs-local`, and read, create, overwrite, and unread edit succeed; with the policy, unread edit returns `FS_NOT_OBSERVED` and unread overwrite is gated by `createIfAbsent`. A later intent listener is not reached after the policy decides. Stale edits fail through provider CAS while the policy performs no `stat`; the tool budgets remain one `stat` for read and zero for write or edit on either path. Model-facing schemas remain byte-for-byte unchanged, so snapshots do not change.
+Tests pin both paths: without `dsh-fs-policy`, the root tool plugin boots against `dsh-fs-local`, and read, create, overwrite, and unread edit succeed; with the policy, unread edit returns `FS_NOT_OBSERVED` and unread overwrite is gated by `createIfAbsent`. A later intent listener is not reached after the policy decides. Stale edits fail through provider CAS while the policy performs no `stat`; the tool budgets remain one `stat` for read and zero for write or edit on either path. The deletion recovery path is also assembled: stale mutation, missing reread, guarded recreation. Model-facing schemas remain byte-for-byte unchanged, while the recovered result transcript changes.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
@@ -166,6 +168,6 @@ Tests pin both paths: without `dsh-fs-policy`, the root tool plugin boots agains
 
 - **Event indirection over a method call.** A waterfall + emit is less direct than `await ctx.fileContext.edit(...)`. The payoff is removing the tool-to-policy method dependency while keeping the default policy plugin; the cost is one more event vocabulary to learn. Mitigated by keeping the three events narrow and documenting the default-thunk semantics on each.
 - **Policy events in the storage seam.** `dsh-fs` gains two version-decision events plus a recording event though it is "just storage". This is the price of decoupling (the emitter cannot depend on the policy plugin). The events carry only `dsh-fs` vocabulary plus an opaque `object` actor and no model-facing concepts, so the seam stays free of line-window/observation policy types and of the agent/session owner structure.
-- **Single policy occupant, first-wins by convention.** The `fs/write-intent`/`fs/edit-intent` slots hold exactly one decider; the first-registered (or `prepend`ed) listener wins and the rest are short-circuited. `dsh-fs-policy` owning the slot is a deployment convention, not an event-enforced invariant — a second decider registered first would bypass it. This is acceptable because a second fs-version-policy decider is a misconfiguration, not a feature. If a future need for *layered* fs version policy appears, it is a new Agent Note (a composable value-passing seam), not a silent second listener on these events. Layered permission/audit/sandbox interception already has its home on `tools/execute`.
+- **Single policy occupant, first-wins by convention.** The `fs/write-intent`/`fs/edit-intent` slots hold exactly one decider; the first-registered (or `prepend`ed) listener wins and the rest are short-circuited. `dsh-fs-policy` owning the slot is a deployment convention, not an event-enforced invariant — a second decider registered first would bypass it. This is acceptable because a second fs-version-policy decider is a misconfiguration, not a feature. If a future need for *layered* fs version policy appears, it is a new Agent Note (a composable value-passing waterfall), not a silent second listener on these events. Layered permission/audit/sandbox interception already has its home on `tools/execute`.
 - **Dropping the post-read confirming stat** makes a follow-up *guarded* edit occasionally fail-closed (`FS_STALE_VERSION` → re-read) under a read/write race. This is a UX nicety lost, never a correctness hole; the provider lock still prevents wrong-version writes.
 - **The bare provider does no read-before-write/edit and no version check.** A deployment without `dsh-fs-policy` lets the model overwrite or edit any existing file unconditionally. This is the deliberate meaning of keeping the tool independent of a policy service: the safety disciplines live in the `dsh-fs-policy` plugin. A deployment that omits it is opting into an unconstrained filesystem on purpose; that is not the intended stance for a config that ships the fs tools.

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-26-file-context-as-event-gate.zh.md

@@ -26,25 +26,27 @@ tool          dsh-tool-fs       executor: resolves, reads windows, writes/edits
 policy        dsh-fs-policy  plugin: listens to fs/write-intent +
                                 fs/edit-intent (single-slot waterfall) and fs/observed
                                 (emit) events; adds observed-state + freshness.
-provider seam dsh-fs            ctx.fs: text IO + ATOMIC mutation primitives whose version
+provider contract dsh-fs            ctx.fs: text IO + ATOMIC mutation primitives whose version
                                 guard is OPTIONAL; owns the fs policy event vocabulary
 provider      dsh-fs-local      local implementation of ctx.fs
 ```
 
 该模型是叠加式的：裸 `ctx.fs` 执行原子化、无约束的文本 I/O，而 `dsh-fs-policy` 叠加观测状态、先读后编辑和版本守卫。因此移除策略层后工具仍可用，只是不受约束。正式发布的 agent 配置会加载策略；裸模式的存在是为了让策略在服务边界保持可选，而非作为正常部署姿态。
 
+[文件系统缺失观测后续决策](../bug-fix/2026-08-09-filesystem-absence-observation.md)把记录载荷从仅表示成功的版本细化为显式的存在/缺失状态，并要求带防护的创建以不替换方式发布。事件门禁归属与无 I/O 策略边界保持不变。
+
 `dsh-tool-fs` 不再注入 `fileContext`。它注入 `fs` 和 `tools`/`systemPrompt`。
 
 ## 策略由提供方 CAS 强制执行，而非 `dsh-fs-policy` 的 stat
 
 `dsh-fs-policy` 强制执行「你必须基于你读到的版本来写入/编辑」，**自身从不调用 `stat` 或比较版本**。它将观测到的版本作为 CAS 基准提供，让提供方的 mutation 临界区检测陈旧性：
 
-- 「你读过这个文件吗？」是 `dsh-fs-policy` 在本地决定的唯一事项——一次 `WeakMap` 查找，无 I/O。无记录 ⇒ `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`。
-- 「你读到的版本是否仍为最新？」由 **`ctx.fs.editText`/`writeText` 内部**决定，在执行 read-match-rename 的同一个原子锁中完成。`dsh-fs-policy` 将 `vObserved` 作为期望值传入；如果文件已变更，提供方抛出 `FS_STALE_VERSION`。
+- 「该所有者最近观测到了什么？」是 `dsh-fs-policy` 在本地决定的唯一事项——一次 `WeakMap` 查找，无 I/O。无记录表示未见；缺失记录只允许带防护的创建；存在记录携带替换/编辑基准。
+- 「版本是否仍然有效，或者创建目标是否仍然缺失？」由**提供方的原子变更边界内部**决定。`dsh-fs-policy` 提供 `replaceIfVersion` 或 `createIfAbsent`；对于已经变化的版本，提供方抛出 `FS_STALE_VERSION`；带防护的创建若败给另一个创建者，则抛出 `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`。
 
 这是有意为之的。如果 `dsh-fs-policy` 在其 waterfall（瀑布式事件）处理器中 stat 并比较版本，该检查与工具实际写入之间会存在 TOCTOU 间隙——文件可能在此期间变化，因此该检查只是一个虚假保证，提供方的锁无论如何都要兜底。将版本检查放在提供方的临界区中既无竞态又无额外 `stat`。所以 `dsh-fs-policy` **不做**任何文件系统 I/O；「必须基于最近一次读取」的保证由 CAS *实现*，`dsh-fs-policy` 只负责选择基准（`vObserved`）并对先前观测进行门控。
 
-## 提供方契约变更：版本守卫变为可选
+## 提供方约定变更：版本守卫变为可选
 
 为使裸提供方不受约束，其两个 mutation 上的版本守卫变为**可选**——传入则守卫，省略则无条件执行：
 
@@ -66,16 +68,16 @@ editText(target: FsTarget, edit: FsEditRequest, expected?: { version: FsVersion
 
 ## 事件词汇（由 `dsh-fs` 拥有）
 
-事件定义在 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs` 中，而非 `dsh-fs-policy` 中。这是解耦契约所迫：`dsh-tool-fs` 是发射方，因此它必须引用事件类型，且即使 `dsh-fs-policy` 不再提供方法服务，它也必须能编译通过。`dsh-fs` 是 `dsh-tool-fs` 和 `dsh-fs-policy` 都已依赖的包，因此它是唯一能让发射方和策略监听方共享词汇而不让发射方依赖策略插件的归属地。
+事件定义在 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs` 中，而非 `dsh-fs-policy` 中。这是解耦约定所迫：`dsh-tool-fs` 是发射方，因此它必须引用事件类型，且即使 `dsh-fs-policy` 不再提供方法服务，它也必须能编译通过。`dsh-fs` 是 `dsh-tool-fs` 和 `dsh-fs-policy` 都已依赖的包，因此它是唯一能让发射方和策略监听方共享词汇而不让发射方依赖策略插件的归属地。
 
-这些事件携带既有的 `dsh-fs` 词汇（`FsTarget`、`FsVersion`、`FsWriteIntent`）加一个不透明的 actor——不携带面向模型的概念（行窗口、行号或渲染后的页脚不会泄漏到此层）。
+这些事件携带既有的 `dsh-fs` 词汇（`FsTarget`、`FsVersion`、`FsObservation`、`FsWriteIntent`）加一个不透明的 actor——不携带面向模型的概念（行窗口、行号或渲染后的页脚不会泄漏到此层）。
 
 **两个 `fs/*` 决策事件是单槽、先到先得的 waterfall。** `dsh-fs-policy` 不调用 `next()` 直接返回，因此在默认部署中它占据该槽位；更早注册或使用 `prepend` 的监听器会替代该策略。权限、审计和沙箱关注点仍留在可组合的 `tools/execute` waterfall 上。
 
-actor 在 `dsh-fs` 中类型为 `object`——一个纯粹的不透明载体，提供方 seam 从不读取或收窄它。owner 的推导（`actor.agent?.session`）和 `{ agent?: { session? } }` 结构形状完全留在 `dsh-fs-policy` 内部，由其在监听器中将 `object` actor 收窄为该形状。`dsh-fs` 拥有事件名和 fs 词汇；它不拥有策略层的运行时 owner 结构。
+actor 在 `dsh-fs` 中类型为 `object`——一个纯粹的不透明载体，提供方约定从不读取或收窄它。owner 的推导（`actor.agent?.session`）和 `{ agent?: { session? } }` 结构形状完全留在 `dsh-fs-policy` 内部，由其在监听器中将 `object` actor 收窄为该形状。`dsh-fs` 拥有事件名和 fs 词汇；它不拥有策略层的运行时 owner 结构。
 
 ```ts
-import type { FsTarget, FsVersion, FsWriteIntent } from '@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs'
+import type { FsObservation, FsTarget, FsVersion, FsWriteIntent } from '@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs'
 
 interface Events {
   /**
@@ -95,22 +97,22 @@ interface Events {
    */
   'fs/edit-intent'(target: FsTarget, actor: object | undefined, next: () => { version: FsVersion } | undefined | Promise<{ version: FsVersion } | undefined>): Promise<{ version: FsVersion } | undefined>
   /**
-   * Record that an actor observed a target at a version, after a successful
-   * read/write/edit. Fire-and-forget (plain emit). Listeners MUST be
+   * Record that an actor observed a target as present at a version or absent.
+   * Fire-and-forget (plain emit). Listeners MUST be
    * synchronous, side-effect-only recorders (`dsh-fs-policy`'s is a WeakMap
    * write); the tool does not guard the emit, so a throwing listener surfaces as
    * the tool's isError result. No listener ⇒ nothing recorded.
    * @mode emit
    */
-  'fs/observed'(target: FsTarget, version: FsVersion, actor: object | undefined): void
+  'fs/observed'(target: FsTarget, observation: FsObservation, actor: object | undefined): void
 }
 ```
 
 `fs/*` 决策事件是**由工具分发的无绑定 waterfall**（类似 `agent/request`，由循环分发且无 `this`），而非服务绑定的 waterfall（如 `llm/stream`）。分发者是 `dsh-tool-fs` 插件，它不是一个服务。
 
-## 工具契约（`dsh-tool-fs`）
+## 工具约定（`dsh-tool-fs`）
 
-工具保留其面向模型的 schema（`read`/`write`/`edit`，逐字节不变）和提示词段落。提示词引导仍以策略优先，因为加载 fs 工具的部署预期也会加载 `dsh-fs-policy`：模型仍被告知在覆写或编辑前先读取，任何声称「后端」要求如此的措辞应修正为 fs-policy 插件要求如此。裸提供方回退不改变提示词立场。
+工具保留其面向模型的 schema（`read`/`write`/`edit`，逐字节不变）和提示词段落。提示词引导仍以策略优先，因为加载 fs 工具的部署预期也会加载 `dsh-fs-policy`：模型仍被告知在覆写或编辑前先读取，而该要求来自 fs-policy 插件，并非后端。裸提供方回退不改变提示词立场。
 
 `dsh-tool-fs` 获得从旧 `fileContext` 方法服务迁移来的执行器职责，包括**读取渲染**（`read-render.ts`：`buildWindow` + `formatReadOutput`、`READ_MAX_BYTES`、`READ_MAX_LINE_LENGTH`、`FileReadOutcome`/`FileTextLine`，以及 `read.ts` 中的 `STREAM_MIN_SIZE`），这些现在是工具的渲染细节，因为读取已由工具拥有。这些读取渲染类型和辅助函数移入 `dsh-tool-fs`；策略插件不得继续作为工具的类型依赖。
 
@@ -118,25 +120,25 @@ interface Events {
 
 通过让 waterfall 惰性产出期望值来最小化 `stat` 预算——裸默认返回 `undefined`（无守卫），从不 stat：
 
-- **read**——一次 `stat`（类型 + 大小路由 + 版本），然后 `readText`/`streamText`，然后 `buildWindow`，然后 `emit('fs/observed', target, info.version, exec)`。旧 `fileContext.read` 中读后确认的 `stat` 被移除；在路由 stat 和读取之间竞争的写入者最多只能使*后续*有守卫的编辑误报 `FS_STALE_VERSION`（为安全起见拒绝写入：模型会重新读取；由于 `editText` 会在其锁内复查，模型绝不会基于错误版本写入）。
-- **write**——`expectation = await ctx.waterfall('fs/write-intent', target, exec, () => undefined)`，然后 `ctx.fs.writeText(target, content, expectation)`，然后 `emit('fs/observed', target, outcome.version, exec)`。无论是否有 `dsh-fs-policy`，**工具内零 stat**。
-- **edit**——`expectation = await ctx.waterfall('fs/edit-intent', target, exec, () => undefined)`，然后 `ctx.fs.editText(target, edit, expectation)`，然后 `emit('fs/observed', target, outcome.version, exec)`。两种情况下**工具内零 stat**：裸默认为 `undefined`（无条件编辑），因此工具从不 stat 来制造基准。如果目标不存在，提供方即使在无守卫路径上也报告 `FS_STALE_VERSION`。
+- **read**——一次 `stat`；元数据未命中时，在返回 `FS_NOT_FOUND` 前 emit `{ kind: 'absent' }`；目标为文件时，则依次执行 `readText`/`streamText`、`buildWindow`，再 emit `{ kind: 'present', version: info.version }`。旧 `fileContext.read` 中读后确认的 `stat` 仍保持移除；在路由 stat 和读取之间竞争的写入者最多只能使后续带防护的编辑误报陈旧。
+- **write**——`expectation = await ctx.waterfall('fs/write-intent', target, exec, () => undefined)`，然后 `ctx.fs.writeText(target, content, expectation)`，再 emit 表示存在的结果版本。无论是否有 `dsh-fs-policy`，**工具内零 stat**。
+- **edit**——`expectation = await ctx.waterfall('fs/edit-intent', target, exec, () => undefined)`，然后 `ctx.fs.editText(target, edit, expectation)`，再 emit 表示存在的结果版本。两种情况下**工具内零 stat**：裸默认为 `undefined`（无条件编辑），因此工具从不 stat 来制造基准。如果裸路径上的目标不存在，提供方报告 `FS_STALE_VERSION`；策略已持有缺失观测时，则直接返回 `FS_NOT_FOUND`。
 
 工具在每次分发时将 `exec`（工具执行上下文）作为 `actor` 参数传入，以便 `dsh-fs-policy` 推导其观测状态的 owner。工具不知道策略插件是否存在：它始终在 `next` thunk 中提供裸默认行为，而 `dsh-fs-policy` 在默认部署中会在 thunk 运行前短路它。
 
-**`fs/observed` 在操作成功后触发。** 其监听器必须是同步、不抛异常的记录器；工具不对 plain emit 做保护，因此抛异常的监听器会在 mutation 已成功后报告失败。异步或可失败的观测需要另一份事件契约。
+**`fs/observed` 在操作成功后，以及元数据探测确认缺失后触发。** 其监听器必须是同步、不抛异常的记录器；工具不对 plain emit 做保护，因此抛异常的监听器可能取代待返回的读取错误，或在 mutation 已成功后报告失败。异步或可失败的观测需要另一份事件约定。
 
-## 策略插件契约（`dsh-fs-policy`）
+## 策略插件约定（`dsh-fs-policy`）
 
-`dsh-fs-policy` 是插件，不是服务。它不注册 `ctx.fileContext`，没有公开方法面，不暴露 `read`/`write`/`edit`/`resolve` 方法。它通过 `ctx.on()` 注册三个监听器（每个返回一个 disposer 用于 HMR）。它维护观测状态 `WeakMap<owner, Map<targetKey, { version }>>`，以及结构化的 owner 推导（将事件中不透明的 `object` actor 收窄为自己的 `{ agent?: { session? } }` 形状），但不注入 `fs`——每个处理器只操作自己的 `WeakMap`，从不操作 `ctx.fs`。
+`dsh-fs-policy` 是插件，不是服务。它不注册 `ctx.fileContext`，没有公开方法面，不暴露 `read`/`write`/`edit`/`resolve` 方法。它通过 `ctx.on()` 注册三个监听器（每个返回一个 disposer 用于 HMR）。它维护观测状态 `WeakMap<owner, Map<targetKey, FsObservation>>`，以及结构化的 owner 推导（将事件中不透明的 `object` actor 收窄为自己的 `{ agent?: { session? } }` 形状），但不注入 `fs`——每个处理器只操作自己的 `WeakMap`，从不操作 `ctx.fs`。
 
-- `fs/write-intent` 监听器：`prior = getObserved(owner, key)`；返回 `prior ? { kind: 'replaceIfVersion', version: prior.version } : { kind: 'createIfAbsent' }`。它不调用 `next()`：完全占据单一决策槽位。
-- `fs/edit-intent` 监听器：`prior = getObserved(owner, key)`；如果无 `owner` 或无 `prior`，抛出 `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`；否则返回 `{ version: prior.version }`。同样不调用 `next()`。
-- `fs/observed` 监听器：`record(owner, key, version)`。
+- `fs/write-intent` 监听器：未见/缺失 ⇒ `createIfAbsent`；存在 ⇒ `replaceIfVersion`。它不调用 `next()`：完全占据单一决策槽位。
+- `fs/edit-intent` 监听器：未见 ⇒ `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`；缺失 ⇒ `FS_NOT_FOUND`；存在 ⇒ 返回其版本守卫。同样不调用 `next()`。
+- `fs/observed` 监听器：记录存在/缺失的可辨识值。
 
-一条观测状态条目是**先前观测记录**：成功的 `read`、`write` 或 `edit` 都会 emit `fs/observed` 并记录 `{ version }`，因此条目的存在意味着「此 owner 在此版本观测过此目标」，而非狭义的「已读取过」。这使得 create-then-edit 或 edit-then-edit 序列无需中间重新读取即可工作：mutation 将记录的版本刷新为自身的结果，因此下一次编辑的基准就是它刚产出的版本。`FS_NOT_OBSERVED` 只拒绝完全没有任何先前观测的编辑。owner 从 `{ agent?: { session? } }` 结构化推导；dispose 时丢弃所有状态（HMR 安全）。
+一条观测状态条目是**先前观测记录**，但其可辨识字段会影响决策。成功的 read/write/edit 会记录存在状态及版本，使 create-then-edit 或 edit-then-edit 序列无需中间重新读取即可工作。确认缺失的 read/view 会用缺失状态取代旧的正向版本，因此只允许带防护的创建；随后成功的创建会再用新的存在版本取代缺失状态。只有条目不存在才表示未见，并使 edit 返回 `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`。owner 从 `{ agent?: { session? } }` 结构化推导；dispose 时丢弃所有状态（HMR 安全）。
 
-`dsh-fs-policy` 现在是一个纯策略/记录插件，没有服务面——它只通过事件 seam 影响外界。这正是移除 `dsh-tool-fs` 方法耦合的关键。
+`dsh-fs-policy` 现在是一个纯策略/记录插件，没有服务面——它只通过事件门控影响外界。这正是移除 `dsh-tool-fs` 方法耦合的关键。
 
 ## 裸提供方行为（无 `dsh-fs-policy`）
 
@@ -150,11 +152,11 @@ interface Events {
 
 ## 取代关系
 
-本 Agent Note 修正——而非推翻——[拆分文件系统 seam Agent Note](../simplification/2026-06-26-fsspec-style-fs-seam.md)。四层拆分、提供方契约和新鲜度*策略*均保留。变更的是**工具与策略层之间的耦合方式**：强制性方法服务变为插件拥有的事件门控，fs I/O + 读取窗口从 `fileContext` 上移至 `dsh-tool-fs`。拆分文件系统 seam Agent Note 中关于 `dsh-tool-fs` 注入 `fileContext` 以及 `fileContext` 拥有 `read`/`write`/`edit` 的描述已在同一变更中更新。
+本 Agent Note 修正——而非推翻——[拆分文件系统 seam Agent Note](../simplification/2026-06-26-fsspec-style-fs-seam.md)。四层拆分、提供方约定和新鲜度*策略*均保留。变更的是**工具与策略层之间的耦合方式**：强制性方法服务变为插件拥有的事件门控，fs I/O + 读取窗口从 `fileContext` 上移至 `dsh-tool-fs`。拆分文件系统 seam Agent Note 中关于 `dsh-tool-fs` 注入 `fileContext` 以及 `fileContext` 拥有 `read`/`write`/`edit` 的描述已在同一变更中更新。
 
 ## 验证
 
-测试固定了两条路径：无 `dsh-fs-policy` 时，根工具插件对 `dsh-fs-local` 启动，read、create、overwrite 和未读 edit 均成功；有策略时，未读 edit 返回 `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`，未读 overwrite 被 `createIfAbsent` 门控。策略决定后，后注册的 intent 监听器不会被触达。陈旧编辑通过提供方 CAS 失败，而策略不执行 `stat`；工具预算在两条路径上保持 read 一次 `stat`，write 或 edit 均为零次。面向模型的 schema 逐字节不变，因此快照不变。
+测试固定了两条路径：无 `dsh-fs-policy` 时，根工具插件对 `dsh-fs-local` 启动，read、create、overwrite 和未读 edit 均成功；有策略时，未读 edit 返回 `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`，未读 overwrite 被 `createIfAbsent` 门控。策略决定后，后注册的 intent 监听器不会被触达。陈旧编辑通过提供方 CAS 失败，而策略不执行 `stat`；工具预算在两条路径上保持 read 一次 `stat`，write 或 edit 均为零次。测试也组装了删除恢复路径：陈旧变更、重新读取时确认缺失、带防护的重新创建。面向模型的 schema 逐字节不变，但恢复后的结果 transcript（文本记录）发生变化。
 
 ## 曾考虑的替代方案
 
@@ -166,6 +168,6 @@ interface Events {
 
 - **事件间接层取代方法调用。** 一次 waterfall + emit 不如 `await ctx.fileContext.edit(...)` 直接。收益是移除了工具到策略的方法依赖，同时保留默认策略插件；代价是多一套事件词汇需要学习。通过保持三个事件的窄小范围并在每个事件上记录 default-thunk 语义来缓解。
 - **策略事件位于存储 seam 中。** `dsh-fs` 增加了两个版本决策事件和一个记录事件，尽管它「只是存储」。这是解耦的代价（发射方不能依赖策略插件）。这些事件只携带 `dsh-fs` 词汇加一个不透明的 `object` actor，不携带面向模型的概念，因此 seam 不沾染行窗口/观测策略类型，也不沾染 agent/会话所有者结构。
-- **单一策略占位者，按约定先到先得。** `fs/write-intent`/`fs/edit-intent` 槽位恰好容纳一个决策者；先注册（或 `prepend`）的监听器获胜，其余被短路。`dsh-fs-policy` 占据该槽位是部署约定，而非事件系统强制的不变式——一个先注册的第二决策者会绕过它。这是可接受的，因为第二个 fs 版本策略决策者是配置错误，而非功能。如果未来出现*分层* fs 版本策略的需求，那是一个新 Agent Note（可组合的值传递 seam），而非在这些事件上静默添加第二个监听器。分层的权限/审计/沙箱拦截已有其归属：`tools/execute`。
+- **单一策略占位者，按约定先到先得。** `fs/write-intent`/`fs/edit-intent` 槽位恰好容纳一个决策者；先注册（或 `prepend`）的监听器获胜，其余被短路。`dsh-fs-policy` 占据该槽位是部署约定，而非事件系统强制的不变式——一个先注册的第二决策者会绕过它。这是可接受的，因为第二个 fs 版本策略决策者是配置错误，而非功能。如果未来出现*分层* fs 版本策略的需求，那是一个新 Agent Note（可组合的值传递 waterfall），而非在这些事件上静默添加第二个监听器。分层的权限/审计/沙箱拦截已有其归属：`tools/execute`。
 - **移除读后确认 stat** 使后续*有守卫*的编辑在 read/write 竞争下偶尔为安全起见拒绝写入（`FS_STALE_VERSION` → 重新读取）。这是丢失的 UX 便利，绝非正确性漏洞；提供方锁仍阻止基于错误版本的写入。
 - **裸提供方不做先读后写/编辑，也不做版本检查。** 没有 `dsh-fs-policy` 的部署允许模型无条件覆写或编辑任何已有文件。这正是保持工具独立于策略服务的有意含义：安全纪律存在于 `dsh-fs-policy` 插件中。省略它的部署是有意选择无约束的文件系统；对于发布 fs 工具的配置而言，这不是预期的姿态。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-30-bash-stdin-env-trusted-plugin-surface.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-30-bash-stdin-env-trusted-plugin-surface.md
-2026-06-30-bash-stdin-env-trusted-plugin-surface.md: 556d5dd86dfcc92c4628e68c19390f0033560d25
-2026-06-30-bash-stdin-env-trusted-plugin-surface.zh.md: 325e3d303bdb6836c8928fdae00de59fb954ff37
+2026-06-30-bash-stdin-env-trusted-plugin-surface.md: d8193b47ff16da7efb5f6bf1c3f34c0e1251572c
+2026-06-30-bash-stdin-env-trusted-plugin-surface.zh.md: 7f5bb62d92f27c49b0f7f262dc64dce39c89f2cd

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-30-bash-stdin-env-trusted-plugin-surface.md

@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@ English | [中文](2026-06-30-bash-stdin-env-trusted-plugin-surface.zh.md)
 
 ## Problem
 
-The hooks subsystem runs external hook commands the way Claude Code and Codex do: a hook is a shell command that receives its event payload as **JSON on stdin** and reads context from a handful of **environment variables** (`CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR`, `CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT`, `PLUGIN_ROOT`, …). The harness already has a perfectly good command runner behind the `ctx.bash` capability seam ([dsh-bash](../../../../packages/bash/bash) → [dsh-bash-local](../../../../packages/bash/bash-local)), with process-group kills, output truncation/spill, and a credential scrub. Reusing it for hook execution means a hook bridge does not re-implement subprocess plumbing — but the seam had no way to write stdin or set extra env. This Agent Note adds those two inputs.
+The hooks subsystem runs external hook commands the way Claude Code and Codex do: a hook is a shell command that receives its event payload as **JSON on stdin** and reads context from a handful of **environment variables** (`CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR`, `CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT`, `PLUGIN_ROOT`, …). The harness already has a perfectly good command runner behind the `ctx.bash` capability seam ([dsh-bash](../../../../packages/bash/bash) → [dsh-bash-local](../../../../packages/bash/bash-local)), with process-group kills, output truncation/spill, and a credential scrub. Reusing it for hook execution means a hook bridge does not re-implement subprocess plumbing — but the seam had no way to write stdin or set extra env. This change adds those two inputs.
 
-`stdin` and `env` do not create a new model capability because ordinary shell syntax already supplies both. Ambient credentials are protected by `dsh-bash-local`'s child-environment scrub, not by hiding these seam fields; model tool arguments are static JSON and do not expand shell variables. The fields therefore serve trusted in-process callers, such as hook bridges, that need to pass structured input and `CLAUDE_*` variables without embedding them in model-visible shell text. See [defensive-patterns.md](../../../../docs/defensive-patterns.md) for the ambient-environment rule.
+`stdin` and `env` do not create a new model capability because ordinary shell syntax already supplies both. Ambient credentials are protected by `dsh-bash-local`'s child-environment scrub, not by hiding these Service Definition fields; model tool arguments are static JSON and do not expand shell variables. The fields therefore serve trusted in-process callers, such as hook bridges, that need to pass structured input and `CLAUDE_*` variables without embedding them in model-visible shell text. See [defensive-patterns.md](../../../../docs/defensive-patterns.md) for the ambient-environment rule.
 
 ## Decision
 
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Add `stdin?: string` and `env?: Record<string, string>` to **both** `BashExecReq
 
 Three deliberate choices:
 
-1. **The model-facing tool omits `stdin` and `env`.** Shell syntax already covers those needs, so duplicate parameters would add surface without authority separation. The tool builds requests only from declared model arguments, signal, and owner; trusted in-process callers may set the seam fields directly. Harness-owned variables use the separate `dshEnv` channel from the [managed environment decision](../feature/2026-07-10-agent-session-identity-and-log-location.md), so ordinary `env` cannot replace them.
+1. **The model-facing tool omits `stdin` and `env`.** Shell syntax already covers those needs, so duplicate parameters would add surface without authority separation. The tool builds requests only from declared model arguments, signal, and owner; trusted in-process callers may set the request fields directly. Harness-owned variables use the separate `dshEnv` channel from the [managed environment decision](../feature/2026-07-10-agent-session-identity-and-log-location.md), so ordinary `env` cannot replace them.
 
 2. **`env` merges AFTER the credential scrub, so an explicit caller entry wins even on a credential-shaped name.** The later managed-namespace decision manages `DSH_*`: ambient entries are removed, and trusted `dshEnv` merges last, so an ordinary `env` entry can never displace a managed value. The complete order is `scrub(process.env, including DSH_*)` → `ENV_OVERRIDES` → ordinary `env` → `dshEnv`.
 
@@ -30,4 +30,4 @@ Three deliberate choices:
 
 ## Consequences
 
-Hook bridges pass JSON payloads and hook-specific variables through the existing bash seam, retaining its process-group, truncation, and spill behavior. The model surface remains unchanged, and the bash tool remains the sole owner of model-call request construction. The vocabulary lives in [the bash data-structure reference](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/bash.md).
+Hook bridges pass JSON payloads and hook-specific variables through the existing bash seam, retaining its process-group, truncation, and spill behavior. The model surface remains unchanged, and the bash tool remains the sole owner of model-call request construction. The vocabulary lives in [the bash data-structure reference](../../../../docs/subsystems/bash.md).

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-30-bash-stdin-env-trusted-plugin-surface.zh.md

@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 问题
 
-钩子子系统以 Claude Code 和 Codex 的方式运行外部钩子命令：钩子是一条 shell 命令，通过 **stdin 上的 JSON** 接收事件载荷，并从若干**环境变量**（`CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR`、`CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT`、`PLUGIN_ROOT`……）读取上下文。harness 已经在 `ctx.bash` 能力 seam 后面有一个完善的命令执行器（[dsh-bash](../../../../packages/bash/bash) → [dsh-bash-local](../../../../packages/bash/bash-local)），具备进程组终止、输出截断/溢出处理和凭证擦除功能。复用它来执行钩子意味着钩子桥接层无需重新实现子进程管道——但该 seam 此前无法写入 stdin 或设置额外 env。本 Agent Note 添加这两个输入。
+钩子子系统以 Claude Code 和 Codex 的方式运行外部钩子命令：钩子是一条 shell 命令，通过 **stdin 上的 JSON** 接收事件载荷，并从若干**环境变量**（`CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR`、`CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT`、`PLUGIN_ROOT`……）读取上下文。harness 已经在 `ctx.bash` 能力 seam 后面有一个完善的命令执行器（[dsh-bash](../../../../packages/bash/bash) → [dsh-bash-local](../../../../packages/bash/bash-local)），具备进程组终止、输出截断/溢出处理和凭证擦除功能。复用它来执行钩子意味着钩子桥接层无需重新实现子进程管道——但该 seam 此前无法写入 stdin 或设置额外 env。本次变更添加这两个输入。
 
-`stdin` 和 `env` 不构成新的模型能力，因为普通 shell 语法已经能提供两者。环境凭证由 `dsh-bash-local` 的子环境擦除机制保护，而非靠隐藏这些 seam 字段；模型工具参数是静态 JSON，不会展开 shell 变量。因此这些字段服务于受信的进程内调用方（如钩子桥接层），它们需要传递结构化输入和 `CLAUDE_*` 变量，而不必将其嵌入模型可见的 shell 文本。环境变量规则见 [defensive-patterns.md](../../../../docs/defensive-patterns.md)。
+`stdin` 和 `env` 不构成新的模型能力，因为普通 shell 语法已经能提供两者。环境凭证由 `dsh-bash-local` 的子环境擦除机制保护，而非靠隐藏这些 Service Definition 字段；模型工具参数是静态 JSON，不会展开 shell 变量。因此这些字段服务于受信的进程内调用方（如钩子桥接层），它们需要传递结构化输入和 `CLAUDE_*` 变量，而不必将其嵌入模型可见的 shell 文本。环境变量规则见 [defensive-patterns.md](../../../../docs/defensive-patterns.md)。
 
 ## 决策
 
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 三个有意为之的选择：
 
-1. **模型侧工具不暴露 `stdin` 和 `env`。** Shell 语法已覆盖这些需求，重复参数只会增加接口面而不带来权限隔离。工具仅从声明的模型参数、signal 和 owner 构建请求；受信的进程内调用方可以直接设置 seam 字段。harness 自有变量使用[托管环境决策](../feature/2026-07-10-agent-session-identity-and-log-location.md)规定的独立 `dshEnv` 通道，因此普通 `env` 无法替换它们。
+1. **模型侧工具不暴露 `stdin` 和 `env`。** Shell 语法已覆盖这些需求，重复参数只会增加接口面而不带来权限隔离。工具仅从声明的模型参数、signal 和 owner 构建请求；受信的进程内调用方可以直接设置请求字段。harness 自有变量使用[托管环境决策](../feature/2026-07-10-agent-session-identity-and-log-location.md)规定的独立 `dshEnv` 通道，因此普通 `env` 无法替换它们。
 
 2. **`env` 在凭证擦除之后合并，因此调用方显式设置的条目即使具有凭证形态的名称也会胜出。** 后续的托管命名空间决策负责管理 `DSH_*`：这类环境条目会被移除，受信的 `dshEnv` 最后合并，因此普通 `env` 条目永远无法顶掉托管值。完整顺序为 `scrub(process.env, including DSH_*)` → `ENV_OVERRIDES` → 普通 `env` → `dshEnv`。
 
@@ -30,4 +30,4 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 后果
 
-钩子桥接层通过既有的 bash seam 传递 JSON 载荷和钩子特定变量，保留其进程组终止、截断和溢出行为。模型接口面不变，bash 工具仍是模型调用请求构建的唯一所有者。相关词汇定义见 [bash 数据结构参考](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/bash.md)。
+钩子桥接层通过既有的 bash seam 传递 JSON 载荷和钩子特定变量，保留其进程组终止、截断和溢出行为。模型接口面不变，bash 工具仍是模型调用请求构建的唯一所有者。相关词汇定义见 [bash 数据结构参考](../../../../docs/subsystems/bash.md)。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.md
-2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.md: 14102b105e7bcaa6a00ac9c406933f772fc45a6f
-2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.zh.md: 91e490b57bcdc1ed95f0b8b40cc9e16ef4d36f29
+2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.md: dbb3ef49979b7eeaa9a43b7db4a2d5a5839b5569
+2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.zh.md: 93fe14adeaa47d276219a316ff1250a9982f5f14

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.md

@@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ The harness extends the agent loop through a Cordis event taxonomy (see [the mic
 
 - `session/*` carries the durable, event-sourced log (`SessionEventMap`).
 - `agent/*` carries live runtime signals that hand a plugin the `Agent` handle.
-- `tools/*` carries the tool registry + execution seam.
+- `tools/*` carries the tool registry and execution pipeline.
 
-Two problems motivated pinning the semantics down. First, several turn/step boundaries existed BOTH as a durable `SessionEvent` (`turn/start`, `turn/end`, `step/start`, `step/end`) AND as a mirrored `agent/*` emit (`agent/turn-start`, `agent/turn-end`, `agent/step-start`, `agent/step-end`). A consumer had two sources of truth for the same fact, and every lifecycle change had to update both. Second, the upcoming Hooks subsystem needs ONE coherent, documented surface to subscribe to — a plugin author (and the Claude Code / Codex hook bridges built on top) must know, without reading the loop, whether to listen on a session event or an agent event, and why.
+Two problems motivated pinning the semantics down. First, several turn/step boundaries existed BOTH as a durable `SessionEvent` (`turn/start`, `turn/end`, `step/start`, `step/end`) AND as a mirrored `agent/*` emit (`agent/turn-start`, `agent/turn-end`, `agent/step-start`, `agent/step-end`). A consumer had two sources of truth for the same fact, and every lifecycle change had to update both. Second, the Hooks subsystem needs ONE coherent, documented surface to subscribe to — a plugin author (and the Claude Code / Codex hook bridges built on top) must know, without reading the loop, whether to listen on a session event or an agent event, and why.
 
 This vocabulary is the foundation for interception decisions, the durable `hook/*` log, and the Claude Code and Codex bridges.
 
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ This vocabulary is the foundation for interception decisions, the durable `hook/
 
 - **`session/*` — the durable, replayable FACT log.** Owns `SessionEventMap`; every entry is JSON-only (no live objects). One `session/event` emit per append, plus the `session/flush` parallel durability checkpoint. It is also the live transcript feed: a consumer that wants to render or react to what happened subscribes here, so live rendering and replay projections share one path.
 - **`agent/*` — the LIVE runtime surface.** Always carries the live `Agent`. Interception waterfalls (`agent/pre-step`, `agent/request`, `agent/request-error`) transform, reject, or recover; awaited `agent/turn-stopping` observes the stop boundary; transient emits report lifecycle, status, inbox insertion/claim/discard, and errors. Turn and step BOUNDARIES are NOT here — they are durable session events read off `session/event`, as are the token stream (`assistant/chunk`) and mid-turn steering (a `user/message`).
-- **`tools/*` — the tool registry + execution seam.**
+- **`tools/*` — the tool registry and execution pipeline.**
 
 **The boundary rule:** a durable, replayable fact is a `SessionEvent`; a live interception or a transient/live-object signal is an `agent`/`tools` Cordis event. A turn or step boundary is a durable fact, so it lives in the session log and is read off the `session/event` feed — it is NOT mirrored as an `agent/*` emit.
 
@@ -34,6 +34,6 @@ This vocabulary is the foundation for interception decisions, the durable `hook/
 - Tests that observed boundaries via the removed emits now observe the durable `turn/start`/`turn/end`/`step/start`/`step/end` session events — the behavior they pin (boundary ordering, step counting) is unchanged; only the feed they read moved to the canonical one. The tests that exercised a *throwing turn-boundary emit listener* were deleted, because that code path no longer exists (there is no emit to throw from). Per [AGENTS.md "tests document behavior, not golden truth"](../../../../AGENTS.md), the behavior and its test moved (or died) together.
 - The loop marks the step open (`stepOpen = true`) only after `append('step/start')` returns. Internal dispatch validation runs before the log push and may reject without opening a step; post-commit `session/event` observer failures are contained inside `Session.append`. The marker therefore represents exactly the committed boundary that owes a later `step/end`.
 - The full realization of this is [the simplification Agent Note "Stop mirroring durable boundaries as agent events"](../simplification/2026-06-20-remove-agent-boundary-mirror-events.md): all four boundary mirrors are removed and every consumer reads boundaries off `session/event`. `agent/steering` (not a boundary mirror) stayed outside that Agent Note's scope and was removed by its own follow-up, [Remove the `agent/steering` mirror emit](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md) — it mirrored the durable mid-turn steering `user/message`.
-- The cordis events catalog (`docs/cordis-catalog/events.md`) is regenerated to drop the mirror events.
+- The generated cordis event surface (the `docs/subsystems/` pages) no longer lists the mirror events.
 
 <!-- agent-note-format: alternatives-not-recorded (pre-format Agent Note) -->

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.zh.md

@@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ harness 通过 Cordis 事件分类体系扩展 agent loop（智能体循环）
 
 - `session/*` 承载持久的、事件溯源的日志（`SessionEventMap`）。
 - `agent/*` 承载运行时实时信号，向插件传递 `Agent` 句柄。
-- `tools/*` 承载工具注册表与执行 seam。
+- `tools/*` 承载工具注册表与执行流水线。
 
-两个问题促使我们固定语义。第一，若干轮次/步骤边界同时作为持久的 `SessionEvent`（`turn/start`、`turn/end`、`step/start`、`step/end`）和镜像的 `agent/*` emit（`agent/turn-start`、`agent/turn-end`、`agent/step-start`、`agent/step-end`）存在。消费方对同一事实有两个真源，每次生命周期变更都必须同时更新两处。第二，即将到来的钩子子系统需要一个连贯且有文档的订阅表面——插件作者（以及基于其上构建的 Claude Code / Codex 钩子桥接）必须在不阅读循环代码的情况下知道应该监听会话事件还是 agent 事件，以及原因。
+两个问题促使我们固定语义。第一，若干轮次/步骤边界同时作为持久的 `SessionEvent`（`turn/start`、`turn/end`、`step/start`、`step/end`）和镜像的 `agent/*` emit（`agent/turn-start`、`agent/turn-end`、`agent/step-start`、`agent/step-end`）存在。消费方对同一事实有两个真源，每次生命周期变更都必须同时更新两处。第二，钩子子系统需要一个连贯且有文档的订阅表面——插件作者（以及基于其上构建的 Claude Code / Codex 钩子桥接）必须在不阅读循环代码的情况下知道应该监听会话事件还是 agent 事件，以及原因。
 
 这套词汇是拦截决策、持久的 `hook/*` 日志，以及 Claude Code 和 Codex 桥接的基础。
 
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ harness 通过 Cordis 事件分类体系扩展 agent loop（智能体循环）
 
 - **`session/*`——持久的、可回放的事实日志。** 拥有 `SessionEventMap`；每条记录仅含 JSON（无活对象）。每次追加触发一次 `session/event` emit，加上 `session/flush` 并行持久性检查点。它同时也是实时 transcript（文本记录）源：想渲染或响应已发生事件的消费方在此订阅，因此实时渲染与回放投影共享同一路径。
 - **`agent/*`——运行时实时表面。** 始终携带活的 `Agent`。拦截 waterfall（瀑布式事件）（`agent/pre-step`、`agent/request`、`agent/request-error`）负责变换、拒绝或恢复；awaited `agent/turn-stopping` 观察停止边界；瞬态 emit 报告生命周期、状态、inbox 插入／领取／丢弃与错误。轮次和步骤边界不在此处——它们是持久的会话事件，从 `session/event` 读取；token 流（`assistant/chunk`）和中途 steering（以 `user/message` 呈现）同理。
-- **`tools/*`——工具注册表与执行 seam。**
+- **`tools/*`——工具注册表与执行流水线。**
 
 **边界规则：** 持久的、可回放的事实是 `SessionEvent`；实时拦截或瞬态/活对象信号是 `agent`/`tools` Cordis 事件。轮次或步骤边界是持久事实，因此存在于会话日志中并从 `session/event` 源读取——不会被镜像为 `agent/*` emit。
 
@@ -34,6 +34,6 @@ harness 通过 Cordis 事件分类体系扩展 agent loop（智能体循环）
 - 之前通过已移除 emit 观察边界的测试，现在观察持久的 `turn/start`/`turn/end`/`step/start`/`step/end` 会话事件——它们所锁定的行为（边界顺序、步骤计数）不变；只是读取的源移到了规范源。那些测试*抛出异常的轮次边界 emit 监听器*的用例被删除，因为该代码路径不再存在（没有 emit 可供抛出）。按照 [AGENTS.md「测试记录行为，而非黄金真相」](../../../../AGENTS.md)，行为与其测试一同迁移（或一同消亡）。
 - 循环仅在 `append('step/start')` 返回后才标记步骤已打开（`stepOpen = true`）。内部分发校验在日志推入之前运行，可能在不打开步骤的情况下拒绝；post-commit `session/event` observer 的失败被隔离在 `Session.append` 内部。因此该标记精确表示已提交的、欠一个后续 `step/end` 的边界。
 - 完整实现见[简化 Agent Note「停止将持久边界镜像为 agent 事件」](../simplification/2026-06-20-remove-agent-boundary-mirror-events.md)：全部四个边界镜像被移除，所有消费方从 `session/event` 读取边界。`agent/steering`（不是边界镜像）不在该 Agent Note 范围内，由其后续 Agent Note [移除 `agent/steering` 镜像 emit](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md) 单独移除——它镜像的是持久的中途 steering `user/message`。
-- Cordis 事件目录（`docs/cordis-catalog/events.md`）重新生成以移除镜像事件。
+- 生成的 cordis 事件表面（`docs/subsystems/` 各页）不再列出镜像事件。
 
 <!-- agent-note-format: alternatives-not-recorded (pre-format Agent Note) -->

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-02-fs-per-session-cwd.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-02-fs-per-session-cwd.md
-2026-07-02-fs-per-session-cwd.md: d3f54e89e735016a373fa14c60123c681b3e7adf
-2026-07-02-fs-per-session-cwd.zh.md: 86058437a14f64cc7faf6e6ad413c52efba5fd39
+2026-07-02-fs-per-session-cwd.md: 23c9f414590df8c79109e46f24af031b765b8f58
+2026-07-02-fs-per-session-cwd.zh.md: 5e429bbda16c2c7e29114e6d8586c13b658cac0a

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-02-fs-per-session-cwd.md

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Thread the caller's session cwd into path resolution, exactly as `dsh-tool-bash`
 
 ### Why the caller supplies the cwd (not the provider)
 
-The provider seam must not depend on `dsh-agent` / `dsh-session` — it is a text-storage backend that a sandboxed or remote implementation also satisfies, and those have no notion of an "agent session". The tool already receives the `ToolExecution` (`exec`), which carries the agent, so the tool is the right place to project `exec → cwd` and hand the provider a plain string. This is the "explicit > implicit at package seams" convention: the base directory arrives as an explicit argument the provider acts on, not smuggled in by having the provider reach into a session it should not know about. It also matches `dsh-tool-bash` one-to-one, so the two model-facing file surfaces resolve paths identically.
+The provider contract must not depend on `dsh-agent` / `dsh-session` — it is a text-storage backend that a sandboxed or remote implementation also satisfies, and those have no notion of an "agent session". The tool already receives the `ToolExecution` (`exec`), which carries the agent, so the tool is the right place to project `exec → cwd` and hand the provider a plain string. This is the "explicit > implicit at package boundaries" convention: the base directory arrives as an explicit argument the provider acts on, not smuggled in by having the provider reach into a session it should not know about. It also matches `dsh-tool-bash` one-to-one, so the two model-facing file surfaces resolve paths identically.
 
 The default lives in ONE place — the provider's `config.cwd`. `sessionCwd` returns `undefined` rather than `process.cwd()` when there is no session, so the tool never manufactures a base the provider would otherwise choose.
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-02-fs-per-session-cwd.zh.md

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ ACP（Agent Client Protocol）桥接层为每个会话提供独立的工作区
 
 ### 为何由调用方（而非提供方）提供 cwd
 
-提供方 seam 不得依赖 `dsh-agent`／`dsh-session`——它是一个文本存储后端，沙箱或远程实现同样满足该接口，而这些实现没有「agent 会话」的概念。工具已经接收了 `ToolExecution`（`exec`），其中携带 agent，因此工具是将 `exec → cwd` 投影并向提供方传递一个纯字符串的正确位置。这遵循「包边界处显式优于隐式」的约定：基准目录作为显式参数传入，提供方据此行动，而非让提供方越界去读取它不应知晓的会话。这也与 `dsh-tool-bash` 一一对应，使两个面向模型的文件操作接口以相同方式解析路径。
+提供方约定不得依赖 `dsh-agent`／`dsh-session`——它是一个文本存储后端，沙箱或远程实现同样满足该接口，而这些实现没有「agent 会话」的概念。工具已经接收了 `ToolExecution`（`exec`），其中携带 agent，因此工具是将 `exec → cwd` 投影并向提供方传递一个纯字符串的正确位置。这遵循「包边界处显式优于隐式」的约定：基准目录作为显式参数传入，提供方据此行动，而非让提供方越界去读取它不应知晓的会话。这也与 `dsh-tool-bash` 一一对应，使两个面向模型的文件操作接口以相同方式解析路径。
 
 默认值只存在于一个地方——提供方的 `config.cwd`。`sessionCwd` 在没有会话时返回 `undefined` 而非 `process.cwd()`，因此工具永远不会自行制造一个提供方本应自行选择的基准目录。
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.i18n.yaml

@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md
 2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md: 67607b2848305439513503d7e03ad5e2a2e4020a
-2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.zh.md: 9cbab75ce87f6d313ca4b6ac8dda043733361f0d
+2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.zh.md: f69442cc1cf226a5dd949fc3890029a69a639953

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.zh.md

@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ terminal 意图只用于展示。harness 仍通过自身的 bash 服务执行命
 ## 曾考虑的替代方案
 
 - **完全删除工具自有的展示**：即本 Agent Note 所取代的那个被否决的 collapse 提案；其自身的结论正是推迟到两个真实工具和两个真实消费方存在后再做此联合类型，该条件现已满足。
-- **让 UI 执行 terminal 意图**：否决。这样会绕过 harness 的 bash 策略与归属契约，并把命令执行分裂到不同后端。terminal 卡片描述的是 harness 拥有的执行，绝不授权客户端侧执行。
+- **让 UI 执行 terminal 意图**：否决。这样会绕过 harness 的 bash 策略与归属约定，并把命令执行分裂到不同后端。terminal 卡片描述的是 harness 拥有的执行，绝不授权客户端侧执行。
 - **可合并扩展的联合类型**（`ContentBlockMap` 模式）：否决。新的渲染意图无论如何需要新的 bridge 代码来渲染，因此一个被 bridge 静默丢弃的插件添加变体，比封闭联合类型在 bridge 的 `assertNever` switch 处引发的编译错误更糟糕。
 - **保留可选字段集合**：即「问题」一节所剖析的现状：无效状态可表达、字段交互无文档、且完全无法请求 diff 卡片。
 
@@ -78,5 +78,5 @@ terminal 意图只用于展示。harness 仍通过自身的 bash 服务执行命
 ## 相关
 
 - 取代早先被否决的折叠工具自有呈现提案（已否决——「等两个真实工具和两个真实消费方，然后做带标签 render-intent 联合类型」）中的推迟决定。该条件现已满足；本 Agent Note 即为那个联合类型。
-- 被[结果时已应用 hunk 差异](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-02-result-time-applied-hunk-diffs.md)（已归档）扩展：后者添加了一个持久化的 `meta` 通道，使 write/edit 在结果时输出 `DiffResultView`（应用后的变更：带上下文行的 contextual hunk / 每个 `replace_all` 位点一个，或创建时的整文件 diff）——值/呈现拆分与持久化的 `presentationMeta` 通道现由[规范工具输出契约](2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.md)拥有。
+- 被[结果时已应用 hunk 差异](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-02-result-time-applied-hunk-diffs.md)（已归档）扩展：后者添加了一个持久化的 `meta` 通道，使 write/edit 在结果时输出 `DiffResultView`（应用后的变更：带上下文行的 contextual hunk / 每个 `replace_all` 位点一个，或创建时的整文件 diff）——值/呈现拆分与持久化的 `presentationMeta` 通道现由[规范工具输出约定](2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.md)拥有。
 - 将 `ToolTerminal` 折入当前 UI 传输层使用的带标签 `terminal` 视图。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-prompt-variables-and-tool-guidance-ownership.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-prompt-variables-and-tool-guidance-ownership.md
-2026-07-05-prompt-variables-and-tool-guidance-ownership.md: a3b5021daf323971308760bde4f97651db8edbda
-2026-07-05-prompt-variables-and-tool-guidance-ownership.zh.md: 490d41302ea4f4e14e11e301acbf47170f95cace
+2026-07-05-prompt-variables-and-tool-guidance-ownership.md: 8f8b40a44314fc6add97842d48273e49927f92e2
+2026-07-05-prompt-variables-and-tool-guidance-ownership.zh.md: 6fc71e2ab866822cee389c0c54efe1731847cbb7

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-prompt-variables-and-tool-guidance-ownership.md

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ The assembled system prompt had four defects, all of one family: facts the harne
 
 ## Decision
 
-**One principle: every fact in the prompt has exactly one owner.** The model name and workspace are config/session facts → the harness exposes them as variables and the persona references them. Per-tool semantics and when-to-use → the tool's `description`. Cross-call habits a description cannot carry → the tool package's prompt section. Harness provenance → the static `harness:identity` section. Deployment role and behavior → the deployment's persona.
+**One principle: every fact in the prompt has exactly one owner.** The model name and workspace are config/session facts → the harness exposes them as variables and the persona references them. Per-tool semantics and when-to-use → the tool's `description`. Cross-call habits a description cannot carry → the tool package's prompt section. The product name and SDK identity line → the static `harness:identity` section. Deployment role and behavior → the deployment's persona.
 
 ### Assemble context
 
@@ -46,9 +46,9 @@ Per-tool semantics and selection guidance live in tool descriptions. Prompt sect
 
 - **The loop composes an identity line itself** — hardcodes model-facing prose in the one package that must stay thin ("plugins, not loop changes"), and outside the section pipeline it would be a second composition path. (The identity DOES ship as a code literal — but as an ordinary section registered by `dsh-system-prompt`, whose `system-prompt/assemble` waterfall remains the escape valve for a deployment that must drop it.)
 - **Inject the model name via the `agent/request` waterfall** — prompt text would be composed in two places and the earlier rendered persona could disagree with the final routed header. The request plugin that owns late routing must also own any earlier prompt claim about that model.
-- **Hand-write the model name in each persona** — duplicates the `model:` key one line above and silently lies after a config edit; the exact disease this Agent Note cures.
+- **Hand-write the model name in each persona** — duplicates the `model:` key one line above and silently lies after a config edit; the exact disease this decision cures.
 - **Lenient interpolation (leave unknown refs verbatim, or substitute empty)** — a typo ships `{{modle}}` (or a hole) to the model and nobody notices until transcript review.
-- **Per-instance subagent wording in config** — returns model-facing prose to every deployment × instance, the P2 disease again. **Keying wording off the provider NAME** — `providerName` is itself config, so a renamed provider silently gets the wrong words.
+- **Per-instance subagent wording in config** — returns model-facing prose to every deployment × instance, reviving the hand-written-guidance-in-leaf-YAML drift. **Keying wording off the provider NAME** — `providerName` is itself config, so a renamed provider silently gets the wrong words.
 - **Resolving the provider at `apply` time (a load-order requirement)** and **section-only subagent wording (lazily resolved at assemble)** — the alternatives to the provider-lifecycle events; both rejected in [the provider-lifecycle-events Agent Note](2026-07-05-subagent-provider-lifecycle-events.md).
 
 ## Out of scope

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-prompt-variables-and-tool-guidance-ownership.zh.md

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 决策
 
-**一条原则：提示词中的每个事实恰好有一个归属方。** 模型名称和工作区是配置/会话事实 → harness 将它们暴露为变量，persona 引用它们。每个工具的语义和何时使用 → 工具的 `description`。description 无法承载的跨调用习惯 → 包的提示词 section。harness 来源标识 → 静态的 `harness:identity` section。部署角色与行为 → 部署的 persona。
+**一条原则：提示词中的每个事实恰好有一个归属方。** 模型名称和工作区是配置/会话事实 → harness 将它们暴露为变量，persona 引用它们。每个工具的语义和何时使用 → 工具的 `description`。description 无法承载的跨调用习惯 → 包的提示词 section。产品名称和 SDK 身份说明 → 静态的 `harness:identity` section。部署角色与行为 → 部署的 persona。
 
 ### 组装上下文
 
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ### 工具指导归属
 
-每个工具的语义和选择指导放在工具 description 中。提示词 section 只承载跨调用习惯，例如检查 bash 退出标记或优先使用文件系统工具而非 shell 命令。`todo_write` 和 subagent 工具不需要 section，因为它们的 description 包含完整契约。部署 persona 只包含角色和行为。
+每个工具的语义和选择指导放在工具 description 中。提示词 section 只承载跨调用习惯，例如检查 bash 退出标记或优先使用文件系统工具而非 shell 命令。`todo_write` 和 subagent 工具不需要 section，因为它们的 description 包含完整约定。部署 persona 只包含角色和行为。
 
 ### Subagent 对话历史描述符
 
@@ -46,9 +46,9 @@ Status: implemented
 
 - **循环自行组合一行 identity 文本**：在必须保持精简的那个包（「用插件，不改循环」）中硬编码面向模型的行文，且在 section 流水线之外构成第二条组合路径。（identity 确实以代码字面量交付——但作为 `dsh-system-prompt` 注册的普通 section，其 `system-prompt/assemble` waterfall 仍是部署需要移除它时的逃生阀。）
 - **通过 `agent/request` waterfall 注入模型名称**：提示词文本会在两处组合，更早渲染的 persona 也可能与最终已路由 header 不一致。拥有延迟路由的请求插件还必须拥有该模型在提示词中更早出现的声明。
-- **在每个 persona 中手写模型名称**：与上方一行的 `model:` 键重复，配置修改后静默失实；正是本 Agent Note 要治愈的病症。
+- **在每个 persona 中手写模型名称**：与上方一行的 `model:` 键重复，配置修改后静默失实；正是本决策要治愈的病症。
 - **宽松插值（未知引用保留原样或替换为空）**：一个拼写错误 `{{modle}}`（或一个空洞）会被发送给模型，直到 transcript（文本记录）审查时才会被发现。
-- **在配置中为每个 subagent 实例编写措辞**：面向模型的行文回到每个部署 × 实例中，重蹈 P2 病症。**根据提供方名称选择措辞**：`providerName` 本身是配置，重命名提供方后会静默获得错误的措辞。
+- **在配置中为每个 subagent 实例编写措辞**：面向模型的行文回到每个部署 × 实例中，重蹈在 leaf YAML 中手写指导的漂移。**根据提供方名称选择措辞**：`providerName` 本身是配置，重命名提供方后会静默获得错误的措辞。
 - **在 `apply` 时解析提供方（加载顺序要求）**与**仅用 section 承载 subagent 措辞（在 assemble 时惰性解析）**：提供方生命周期事件的替代方案；两者均在[提供方生命周期事件 Agent Note](2026-07-05-subagent-provider-lifecycle-events.md)中被否决。
 
 ## 不在范围内

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.md
-2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.md: ebca9b99cad791159302da9c2bbce9f4df147aab
-2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.zh.md: 91ef3fd04502f2c2f092da60a8bd909cf7fa25df
+2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.md: c13e40b5b22e5d6fe19f6b5bd137db3a48350390
+2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.zh.md: 746bcd37dabada949873d394776c1ca43eff4ea2

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.md

@@ -30,9 +30,9 @@ Each proposed step first claims its inbox batch and runs `agent/pre-step`. Rejec
 
 **Enforcement.** The `dsh-agent-loop/invariant` companion registers with `ctx.invariants` and, when selected, independently rebuilds each loop request through a fresh `Session`, so the live cache cannot vouch for itself, then compares messages and folded header fields at `llm/stream`. The loop records the exact frozen request through `markAgentLoopRequest()` in `dsh-llm`; the process-local identity lets the companion and other request observers recognize conversation work, while direct one-shots remain excluded regardless of their frozen shape or session id. Correctness depends on sequence-bounded reconstruction rather than listener order. A with-key e2e requires positive cache-read tokens after the first request; per-step usage is the production signal, and a header change or compaction appears as a cache-read drop on the next step.
 
-### The MiniCode shape: adopted, with the provenance arrow inverted
+### The MiniCode shape: adopted, with the event log as the source
 
-Like MiniCode, the conversation advances append-only and resets only when model-visible state changes. Unlike MiniCode, the event log remains the source of truth because it also owns persistence, recovery, boundaries, tool pairing, and provenance. `Session` caches message and header folds derived from that log, making every request independently checkable.
+Like MiniCode, the conversation advances append-only and resets only when model-visible state changes. Unlike MiniCode, the event log remains the source of truth because it also owns persistence, recovery, boundaries, tool pairing, and links from derived events to their inputs. `Session` caches message and header folds derived from that log, making every request independently checkable.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Like MiniCode, the conversation advances append-only and resets only when model-
 - A request that is not explained by the log cannot be constructed by accident — not by the loop, not by a listener; mutating a built request throws; every header change is a durable, diffable log event.
 - Model-visible context uses logged message channels. `agent.inject()` and tool `additionalContexts` enter the inbox for a later claim, while `agent/pre-step` returns context that must settle with the current claimed batch. Each entered value is a durable sourced `user/message`, paid once and prefix-cached thereafter at the price of accumulating in history until compaction.
 - What still costs full price at the provider is inherent and logged: compaction (its `compact/*` events and replacement entry), a real prompt, tool, or config change (`request/header` with reason `change`), or a process boundary with drift (a differing `resume` snapshot). The provider's own reasoning-content exclusion is managed server-side.
-- `agent/pre-step` is the current-request message seam; direct inbox mutation is the eventual later-request seam.
-- Tool-result trimming (planned) needs no new mechanism: a logged single-entry surface replace (`start === end`) carrying a trimmed `tool/result` under the same `callId` — compaction-family, replay-correct, cache-bust batched by the same pressure logic.
+- `agent/pre-step` is the current-request message channel; direct inbox mutation is the eventual later-request channel.
+- Tool-result trimming needs no new mechanism: a logged single-entry surface replace (`start === end`) carrying a trimmed `tool/result` under the same `callId` — compaction-family, replay-correct, cache-bust batched by the same pressure logic.
 - Session logs grow one `request/header` snapshot per loop instance plus snapshots on real changes. This is larger than a delta codec but small beside chunk-heavy logs and retains one replay representation. `SESSION_FORMAT_VERSION` stays `0`; legacy delta events are rejected rather than migrated.
 - Snapshot expected outputs changed once (every transcript gains its header events); the fs-writing fixtures are stored in the normalized authored form with cwd-relative tool arguments, because replay only round-trips cwd-independent argument paths.

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.zh.md

@@ -30,9 +30,9 @@ Status: implemented
 
 **强制执行。** `dsh-agent-loop/invariant` 配套插件向 `ctx.invariants` 注册，并在被选用时通过一个全新的 `Session` 独立重建每个循环请求，使活跃缓存无法为自身背书，然后在 `llm/stream` 处比较消息和折叠后的 header 字段。循环通过 `dsh-llm` 的 `markAgentLoopRequest()` 记录精确的冻结请求；这一进程内标识让配套插件和其他请求观察者识别对话工作，而直接的一次性调用无论其冻结形状或会话 id 如何都保持排除。正确性依赖于序列有界的重建，而非监听器顺序。带密钥的 e2e 要求首次请求之后有正值的 cache-read token；逐步骤用量是生产信号，header 变更或压缩表现为下一步骤的 cache-read 下降。
 
-### MiniCode 形态：采纳，但溯源箭头反转
+### MiniCode 形态：采纳，以事件日志为真源
 
-与 MiniCode 相同，对话仅追加推进，仅在模型可见状态变更时重置。与 MiniCode 不同，事件日志仍是真源，因为它同时拥有持久化、恢复、边界、工具配对和溯源。`Session` 缓存从日志推导的消息和 header 折叠结果，使每个请求都可独立检查。
+与 MiniCode 相同，对话仅追加推进，仅在模型可见状态变更时重置。与 MiniCode 不同，事件日志仍是真源，因为它同时拥有持久化、恢复、边界、工具配对，并记录派生事件到其输入事件的关联。`Session` 缓存从日志推导的消息和 header 折叠结果，使每个请求都可独立检查。
 
 ## 曾考虑的替代方案
 
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Status: implemented
 - 一个日志无法解释的请求不可能被意外构造——无论是循环还是监听器；变异已构建的请求会抛异常；每个 header 变更都是持久的、可 diff 的日志事件。
 - 模型可见上下文使用已记录消息通道。`agent.inject()` 与工具 `additionalContexts` 进入 inbox，等待后续领取；必须与当前已领取批次一起结算的上下文由 `agent/pre-step` 返回。每个进入步骤的值都是带来源的持久 `user/message`，只付出一次代价并在后续成为可缓存前缀，代价是会在历史中累积直至压缩。
 - 在提供方处仍需全价计算的内容是固有的且已记录的：压缩（其 `compact/*` 事件和替换条目）、真正的提示词、工具或配置变更（reason 为 `change` 的 `request/header`），或带漂移的进程边界（不同的 `resume` 快照）。提供方自身的 reasoning-content 排除由服务端管理。
-- `agent/pre-step` 是当前请求的消息 seam；直接修改 inbox 则是最终进入后续请求的 seam。
-- 工具结果裁剪（计划中）无需新机制：一个已记录的单条目 surface replace（`start === end`），携带同一 `callId` 下裁剪后的 `tool/result`——属压缩家族，回放正确，缓存击穿由相同的压力逻辑批量处理。
+- `agent/pre-step` 是当前请求的消息通道；直接修改 inbox 则是最终进入后续请求的通道。
+- 工具结果裁剪无需新机制：一个已记录的单条目 surface replace（`start === end`），携带同一 `callId` 下裁剪后的 `tool/result`——属压缩家族，回放正确，缓存击穿由相同的压力逻辑批量处理。
 - 会话日志每个循环实例增长一个 `request/header` 快照，并在真正变更时增加快照。它比 delta 编解码器更大，但相对分片密集型日志仍然很小，并只保留一种回放表示。`SESSION_FORMAT_VERSION` 保持 `0`；旧的 delta 事件被拒绝而非迁移。
 - 快照预期输出变更一次（每个 transcript（文本记录）增加其 header 事件）；写入文件系统的 fixture（测试前置数据）以规范化的撰写形式存储，工具参数使用 cwd 相对路径，因为回放只对 cwd 无关的参数路径做往返。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-subagent-provider-lifecycle-events.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-subagent-provider-lifecycle-events.md
-2026-07-05-subagent-provider-lifecycle-events.md: afd45027e8b56cbf1d17e6dec749d8602c81124d
-2026-07-05-subagent-provider-lifecycle-events.zh.md: 01e12946c74fc4fb33c96e047d2030e99b692f47
+2026-07-05-subagent-provider-lifecycle-events.md: 503c0d638785e3a4944c8903b8d7d469c68b1881
+2026-07-05-subagent-provider-lifecycle-events.zh.md: e7d1d8c398a6d77efb2dbccc365e0040f38f2d33

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-subagent-provider-lifecycle-events.md

@@ -31,6 +31,6 @@ The events also complete the seam's vocabulary: `ctx.subagents` is a named regis
 ## Consequences
 
 - Consumers deriving state from a named provider react to `subagent/provider-added`/`-removed` instead of reading the registry at `apply` time; `dsh-tool-subagent` is the reference implementation.
-- **Addition fails loud; removal is contained per listener.** An addition listener may unwind registration. Removal runs during disposal, so one throwing listener is logged without starving later mirrors or disrupting teardown. `start()` still resolves the provider by name for every run, preventing stale tools from calling a removed backend. See the [events catalog](../../../../docs/cordis-catalog/events.md) and [producer/consumer map](../../../../docs/event-producer-consumer.md).
+- **Addition fails loud; removal is contained per listener.** An addition listener may unwind registration. Removal runs during disposal, so one throwing listener is logged without starving later mirrors or disrupting teardown. `start()` still resolves the provider by name for every run, preventing stale tools from calling a removed backend. See the [events catalog](../../../../docs/subsystems/subagent.md#cordis-surface) and [producer/consumer map](../../../../docs/event-producer-consumer.md).
 - **A window where the tool is absent.** Between backend disposal and re-registration (an HMR reload), the model sees no subagent tool. This is the honest state — the alternative is a tool that dispatches into nothing — and the tool registry's `tools/change` emit keeps prompt assembly current.
 - **Two waiting fibers sharing a `toolName` is an invalid config caught late.** If two loads of `dsh-tool-subagent` name different providers but the same `toolName`, both wait, and whichever provider arrives first registers; the second registration throws only when ITS provider arrives. `TODO(subagent-dup-toolname)` in the plugin records this blast radius; the tool registry's duplicate-name rejection remains the backstop.

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-subagent-provider-lifecycle-events.zh.md

@@ -31,6 +31,6 @@ Status: implemented
 ## 后果
 
 - 从命名提供方派生状态的消费方响应 `subagent/provider-added`/`-removed` 事件，而非在 `apply` 时读取注册表；`dsh-tool-subagent` 是参考实现。
-- **添加时大声失败；移除时按监听器隔离。** 添加监听器可以回滚注册。移除在 disposal 期间运行，因此单个监听器抛异常只会被记录到日志中，不会阻止后续镜像运行或干扰拆解流程。`start()` 仍在每次运行时按名称解析提供方，防止陈旧工具调用已移除的后端。见[事件目录](../../../../docs/cordis-catalog/events.md)与[生产者/消费方映射](../../../../docs/event-producer-consumer.md)。
+- **添加时大声失败；移除时按监听器隔离。** 添加监听器可以回滚注册。移除在 disposal 期间运行，因此单个监听器抛异常只会被记录日志，不会饿死后续镜像或干扰拆解流程。`start()` 仍在每次运行时按名称解析提供方，防止陈旧工具调用已移除的后端。见[事件目录](../../../../docs/subsystems/subagent.md#cordis-surface)与[生产者/消费方映射](../../../../docs/event-producer-consumer.md)。
 - **工具不存在的窗口期。** 在后端 disposal 与重新注册之间（HMR 重载期间），模型看不到 subagent 工具。这是诚实的状态——替代方案是一个向空处分发的工具——工具注册表发出的 `tools/change` 事件会使提示词组装保持最新状态。
 - **两个等待中的 fiber 共享同一 `toolName` 是无效配置，被延迟捕获。** 如果两个 `dsh-tool-subagent` 加载实例分别指定了不同的提供方但相同的 `toolName`，两者都会等待，先到达的提供方先注册；第二次注册仅在其提供方到达时才抛异常。插件中的 `TODO(subagent-dup-toolname)` 记录了这一影响范围；工具注册表的重名拒绝机制仍是最终防线。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-windows-jsonl-durable-publish.i18n.yaml

@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-windows-jsonl-durable-publish.md
 2026-07-05-windows-jsonl-durable-publish.md: 38c4adc7a4f85d45e53e70fcac84073ab4e50775
-2026-07-05-windows-jsonl-durable-publish.zh.md: 3a91b7dab0751ad1b7ac1a425371ccf62d23e89c
+2026-07-05-windows-jsonl-durable-publish.zh.md: 205460bcd374bd351cfdf541eb4041c09461229d

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-windows-jsonl-durable-publish.zh.md

@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 问题
 
-`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl` 在首次追加时延迟发布会话日志。POSIX 协议会写入临时文件，对其执行 fsync，将其链接至最终名称，对父目录执行 fsync，然后移除临时链接。对父目录执行 fsync 是持久性契约的一部分：命名空间变更后发生崩溃时，已经提交的最终名称不能丢失，否则调用方会误以为会话日志已经物化。
+`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl` 在首次追加时延迟发布会话日志。POSIX 协议会写入临时文件，对其执行 fsync，将其链接至最终名称，对父目录执行 fsync，然后移除临时链接。对父目录执行 fsync 是持久性约定的一部分：命名空间变更后发生崩溃时，已经提交的最终名称不能丢失，否则调用方会误以为会话日志已经物化。
 
-Windows 具备原子命名空间操作，但 Node 没有暴露与 POSIX 等价的父目录 fsync 契约。如果把 Windows 目录同步失败视为成功，就会在无提示的情况下削弱持久化后端。因此，Windows 路径需要采用不同的发布原语，而不是在 POSIX 的 `syncDir` 辅助函数中添加条件分支。
+Windows 具备原子命名空间操作，但 Node 没有暴露与 POSIX 等价的父目录 fsync 约定。如果把 Windows 目录同步失败视为成功，就会在无提示的情况下削弱持久化后端。因此，Windows 路径需要采用不同的发布原语，而不是在 POSIX 的 `syncDir` 辅助函数中添加条件分支。
 
 ## 决策
 
@@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ Windows 通过持久的暂存发布来创建缺失目录：创建一个以固定
 
 ## 影响
 
-该后端在各平台上维持同一项外部契约：首次追加要么把完整日志发布到最终名称，要么失败且不覆盖已有日志。平台分流只是实现细节；`SessionPersistence` API 和 JSONL 逻辑记录格式均不改变。后续的 [Zstandard 编码决策](2026-07-19-zstandard-jsonl-session-logs.md)会先作用于不透明字节，然后才由任一平台执行发布。
+该后端在各平台上维持同一项外部约定：首次追加要么把完整日志发布到最终名称，要么失败且不覆盖已有日志。平台分流只是实现细节；`SessionPersistence` API 和 JSONL 逻辑记录格式均不改变。后续的 [Zstandard 编码决策](2026-07-19-zstandard-jsonl-session-logs.md)会先作用于不透明字节，然后才由任一平台执行发布。
 
-Windows 测试会在原生 Windows 上执行真实的 Win32 发布路径。断电行为属于 API 契约属性，单元测试无法证明；可测试的不变量包括：Windows 物化不会调用目录 fsync、最终路径冲突会失败、达到最大长度的目标路径组件仍可物化、临时日志在发布前已经执行 fsync，并且生成的日志可以正常加载。
+Windows 测试会在原生 Windows 上执行真实的 Win32 发布路径。断电行为属于 API 约定属性，单元测试无法证明；可测试的不变量包括：Windows 物化不会调用目录 fsync、最终路径冲突会失败、达到最大长度的目标路径组件仍可物化、临时日志在发布前已经执行 fsync，并且生成的日志可以正常加载。
 
 两个平台的追加和修复仍使用普通文件句柄 fsync。追加失败后，系统会关闭仅追加句柄，以读写模式重新打开日志，将文件截断到追加前的大小，并对回滚结果执行 fsync，因为 Windows 不允许在仅追加句柄上调用 `ftruncate`。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-06-timeout-deadline-library.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-06-timeout-deadline-library.md
-2026-07-06-timeout-deadline-library.md: 63463a76a65743436d4e78479800c19e257a42de
-2026-07-06-timeout-deadline-library.zh.md: 16f1a7eba902e6d7b3e2f730cb5df702a37bd429
+2026-07-06-timeout-deadline-library.md: b7c7ac07ce0acec819fa7e88b32b3b6d624f3e6e
+2026-07-06-timeout-deadline-library.zh.md: e4ec6b9a9e07b55faf9f44f2b99b765620e626c4

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-06-timeout-deadline-library.md

@@ -57,10 +57,11 @@ export function deadline(
 export interface IdleWatchdog {
   readonly signal: AbortSignal
   next<T>(iterator: AsyncIterator<T>): Promise<IteratorResult<T>>
+  pulse(): void
   [Symbol.dispose](): void
 }
 
-/** Arm only while one iterator `next()` is outstanding, then rearm on later demand. */
+/** Arm only while one iterator `next()` is outstanding; rearm on later demand or out-of-band activity. */
 export function idleWatchdog(
   upstream: AbortSignal | undefined,
   timeoutMs: number,
@@ -71,7 +72,7 @@ export function idleWatchdog(
 export function timeoutOf(x: AbortSignal | { reason?: unknown }, code?: string): TimeoutReason | undefined
 ```
 
-`deadline` fuses an upstream signal with a one-shot timer through `AbortSignal.any`, adds a typed `TimeoutReason`, and exposes disposable timer cleanup. Non-positive timeouts are an internal no-timeout sentinel for backend-owned background work; external hints pass through `clampTimeout` and must be positive and finite. Without a timer or upstream signal, the function returns a never-aborting signal with the same disposal shape. `idleWatchdog` instead requires a positive finite interval, keeps one stable fused signal for the entire stream, and arms its timer only while one iterator `next()` is outstanding; resolution disarms it, later demand rearms it, concurrent demand fails, and disposal clears the active arm. Providers translate timeout reasons into seam-specific results. `timeoutOf(signal, code)` scopes classification so an outer nested deadline is treated as upstream cancellation rather than the inner capability's timeout.
+`deadline` fuses an upstream signal with a one-shot timer through `AbortSignal.any`, adds a typed `TimeoutReason`, and exposes disposable timer cleanup. Non-positive timeouts are an internal no-timeout sentinel for backend-owned background work; external hints pass through `clampTimeout` and must be positive and finite. Without a timer or upstream signal, the function returns a never-aborting signal with the same disposal shape. `idleWatchdog` instead requires a positive finite interval, keeps one stable fused signal for the entire stream, and arms its timer only while one iterator `next()` is outstanding; resolution disarms it, later demand rearms it, and `pulse()` rearms that same outstanding demand after out-of-band transport activity. A pulse outside outstanding demand or after disposal is a no-op; concurrent demand fails, and disposal clears the active arm. Providers translate timeout reasons into seam-specific results. `timeoutOf(signal, code)` scopes classification so an outer nested deadline is treated as upstream cancellation rather than the inner capability's timeout.
 
 ### The division of labor
 
@@ -79,7 +80,7 @@ export function timeoutOf(x: AbortSignal | { reason?: unknown }, code?: string):
 |---|---|
 | Validate request hint and clamp default/max | `dsh-timeout` (`clampTimeout`) — pure arithmetic plus the shared positive-finite request contract |
 | Arm one-shot timer, abort on deadline, carry reason, fuse with upstream cancel | `dsh-timeout` (`deadline`) |
-| Arm and rearm only around outstanding iterator demand | `dsh-timeout` (`idleWatchdog`) |
+| Arm and rearm only around outstanding iterator demand, including out-of-band activity | `dsh-timeout` (`idleWatchdog`) |
 | Clear the timer | `dsh-timeout` (`[Symbol.dispose]` on either primitive) |
 | Classify the first abort reason after abort | `dsh-timeout` (`timeoutOf`) |
 | **Actually terminate the work** | the capability's implementation |
@@ -92,17 +93,17 @@ The signal only *notifies*; termination is always the listener's job, and the li
 
 - **web_fetch** — the tool stays validate-and-forward; the provider's hand-rolled controller + `setTimeout` + manual listener + `finally` + `signal.reason` recovery is replaced by provider-owned `deadline`/`timeoutOf`. A pre-aborted upstream signal still throws `WEB_ABORTED` up front; otherwise `fetch` runs against the fused `d.signal`, and `translateAbortOrNetwork` classifies a thrown error by the signal (`timeoutOf` → `WEB_FETCH_TIMEOUT`, else aborted → `WEB_ABORTED`, else network → `WEB_PROVIDER_ERROR`). The public error-code contract is unchanged, and `TimeoutReason` never crosses the web seam as the public error.
 - **bash** — `resolve()` clamps the request into an explicit spec. Foreground `run()` creates the deadline and passes its signal to process execution, whose existing abort listener performs the process-group kill. The executor classifies the first abort as timeout or cancellation. Background starts remain timeout-free and forward only upstream cancellation.
-- **LLM adapters** — `dsh-llm-deepseek` and `dsh-llm-pi-ai` wrap actual transport iteration with `idleWatchdog`. The five-minute configured interval covers only outstanding provider demand, not time the downstream consumer spends between chunks. The stable signal reaches `fetch` or the SDK for the whole call, so timeout closes the underlying request and maps to `TIMEOUT`, while an earlier caller abort maps to `ABORTED`.
+- **LLM adapters** — `dsh-llm-deepseek` and `dsh-llm-pi-ai` wrap actual transport iteration with `idleWatchdog`. The five-minute configured interval covers only outstanding provider demand, not time the downstream consumer spends between chunks. The direct DeepSeek adapter also pulses that outstanding demand when its SSE parser observes a comment, without yielding the comment as a `StreamChunk` or writing it to the session log. The pi-ai SDK does not expose comment activity to its adapter, so that path can rearm only when the SDK yields. The stable signal reaches `fetch` or the SDK for the whole call, so timeout closes the underlying request and maps to `TIMEOUT`, while an earlier caller abort maps to `ABORTED`.
 
 ## Consequences
 
-- `runBash`'s outcome no longer independently latches `timedOut` and `aborted`; a timeout and a user abort racing before process close now report a single first-abort cause instead of both being true. The uniform SIGTERM→grace→SIGKILL kill is unchanged, and the seam type `BashRunResult` keeps both booleans (now mutually exclusive), so `dsh-tool-bash`'s result rendering is untouched.
-- `SpawnSpec.timeoutMs` and `SpawnOutcome.timedOut`/`aborted` were removed rather than kept as always-zero/always-false vestiges: with `runBash` owning no timer and the executor owning classification, they were read nowhere. This is the one deviation from the literal proposal shape (which passed `timeoutMs: 0` into `runBash`); an always-0 field read by nothing is dead weight under the per-file coverage gate.
+- `runBash`'s outcome no longer independently latches `timedOut` and `aborted`; a timeout and a user abort racing before process close now report a single first-abort cause instead of both being true. The uniform SIGTERM→grace→SIGKILL kill is unchanged, and the Service Definition type `BashRunResult` keeps both booleans (now mutually exclusive), so `dsh-tool-bash`'s result rendering is untouched.
+- `SpawnSpec.timeoutMs` and `SpawnOutcome.timedOut`/`aborted` were removed rather than kept as always-zero/always-false vestiges: with `runBash` owning no timer and the executor owning classification, they were read nowhere. An always-0 field read by nothing is dead weight under the per-file coverage gate.
 - web_fetch shed its bespoke controller/timer/listener/reason-recovery; the classifier now keys off the deadline signal (`timeoutOf` + `aborted`) rather than the thrown error's shape, which is robust across both the request-phase reject-with-reason and the read-phase bare-`AbortError`.
 - `AbortSignal.any` and `using`/`Symbol.dispose` enter the repo for the first time here (Node ≥ 24 baseline, already met).
-- Model streams now share one rearmable timer contract without turning a sliding idle interval into a total-call deadline or charging consumer think time. The primitive still only notifies; adapter tests prove their transports observe its stable signal and terminate.
+- Model streams now share one rearmable timer contract without turning a sliding idle interval into a total-call deadline or charging consumer think time. Adapters that can observe out-of-band transport activity may pulse an outstanding demand; suppressed activity remains invisible to the watchdog. The primitive still only notifies; adapter tests prove their transports observe its stable signal and terminate.
 
-Out of scope, named to mark the boundary: `web_search` can gain an optional model-facing `timeout_ms` once its tool-schema/snapshot coverage is planned; future ripgrep-backed fs discovery tools can consume the same provider-owned deadline shape once they exist; a `tools/execute` waterfall middleware could arm a default deadline for every tool call by driving `exec.signal` — that would be a plugin that *consumes* this library and still only notifies, the hard kill remaining each capability's job.
+Out of scope, named to mark the boundary: `web_search` can gain an optional model-facing `timeout_ms` once its tool-schema/snapshot coverage is planned; the ripgrep-backed fs discovery tools ([packaged ripgrep search](2026-08-01-packaged-ripgrep-search.md)) consume the same provider-owned deadline shape through `dsh-timeout-policy` and `exec.signal`; a `tools/execute` waterfall middleware could arm a default deadline for every tool call by driving `exec.signal` — that would be a plugin that *consumes* this library and still only notifies, the hard kill remaining each capability's job.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-06-timeout-deadline-library.zh.md

@@ -57,10 +57,11 @@ export function deadline(
 export interface IdleWatchdog {
   readonly signal: AbortSignal
   next<T>(iterator: AsyncIterator<T>): Promise<IteratorResult<T>>
+  pulse(): void
   [Symbol.dispose](): void
 }
 
-/** Arm only while one iterator `next()` is outstanding, then rearm on later demand. */
+/** Arm only while one iterator `next()` is outstanding; rearm on later demand or out-of-band activity. */
 export function idleWatchdog(
   upstream: AbortSignal | undefined,
   timeoutMs: number,
@@ -71,15 +72,15 @@ export function idleWatchdog(
 export function timeoutOf(x: AbortSignal | { reason?: unknown }, code?: string): TimeoutReason | undefined
 ```
 
-`deadline` 通过 `AbortSignal.any` 将上游信号与一次性定时器融合，附加一个类型化的 `TimeoutReason`，并暴露可 dispose（资源释放）的定时器清理。非正数超时是内部的「无超时」哨兵，用于后端拥有的后台任务；外部提示经过 `clampTimeout`，必须为正有限值。既无定时器也无上游信号时，函数返回一个永不中止的信号，具有相同的 disposal 形状。`idleWatchdog` 则要求正有限的间隔，在整个流期间保持一个稳定的融合信号，并且只在一个迭代器 `next()` 尚未结算时启动定时器；结算会解除定时器，后续 demand 会重新启动，并发 demand 会失败，dispose 会清除当前 arm。提供方将超时原因转译为 seam 特定的结果。`timeoutOf(signal, code)` 限定分类范围，使外层嵌套的 deadline 被视为上游取消而非内层能力自身的超时。
+`deadline` 通过 `AbortSignal.any` 将上游信号与一次性定时器融合，附加一个类型化的 `TimeoutReason`，并暴露可 dispose（资源释放）的定时器清理。非正数超时是内部的「无超时」哨兵，用于后端拥有的后台任务；外部提示经过 `clampTimeout`，必须为正有限值。既无定时器也无上游信号时，函数返回一个永不中止的信号，具有相同的 disposal 形状。`idleWatchdog` 则要求正有限的间隔，在整个流期间保持一个稳定的融合信号，并且只在一个迭代器 `next()` 尚未结算时启动定时器；结算会解除定时器，后续 demand 会重新启动，带外传输活动发生后，`pulse()` 则会为同一个尚未结算的 demand 重新启动定时器。若没有尚未结算的 demand，或已经 dispose，pulse 不执行任何操作；并发 demand 会失败，dispose 会清除当前 arm。提供方将超时原因转译为 seam 特定的结果。`timeoutOf(signal, code)` 限定分类范围，使外层嵌套的 deadline 被视为上游取消而非内层能力自身的超时。
 
 ### 职责划分
 
 | 关注点 | 负责方 |
 |---|---|
-| 校验请求提示并钳位默认值/最大值 | `dsh-timeout`（`clampTimeout`）：纯算术加共享的正有限请求契约 |
+| 校验请求提示并钳位默认值/最大值 | `dsh-timeout`（`clampTimeout`）：纯算术加共享的正有限请求约定 |
 | 启动一次性定时器、到期中止、携带 reason、与上游取消融合 | `dsh-timeout`（`deadline`） |
-| 仅围绕未结算的迭代器 demand 启动和重启 | `dsh-timeout`（`idleWatchdog`） |
+| 仅围绕未结算的迭代器 demand 启动和重启，带外活动也会触发重启 | `dsh-timeout`（`idleWatchdog`） |
 | 清除定时器 | `dsh-timeout`（任一原语的 `[Symbol.dispose]`） |
 | 中止后对首个 abort reason 进行分类 | `dsh-timeout`（`timeoutOf`） |
 | **实际终止工作** | 各能力的实现 |
@@ -90,19 +91,19 @@ export function timeoutOf(x: AbortSignal | { reason?: unknown }, code?: string):
 
 ### 各能力如何消费该库
 
-- **web_fetch**：工具层保持校验并转发；提供方手写的 controller + `setTimeout` + 手动监听器 + `finally` + `signal.reason` 恢复被替换为提供方自有的 `deadline`/`timeoutOf`。已预先中止的上游信号仍然立即抛出 `WEB_ABORTED`；否则 `fetch` 使用融合后的 `d.signal` 运行，`translateAbortOrNetwork` 根据信号分类抛出的错误（`timeoutOf` → `WEB_FETCH_TIMEOUT`，否则已中止 → `WEB_ABORTED`，否则网络错误 → `WEB_PROVIDER_ERROR`）。公开的错误码契约不变，`TimeoutReason` 永远不会作为公开错误跨越 web seam。
+- **web_fetch**：工具层保持校验并转发；提供方手写的 controller + `setTimeout` + 手动监听器 + `finally` + `signal.reason` 恢复被替换为提供方自有的 `deadline`/`timeoutOf`。已预先中止的上游信号仍然立即抛出 `WEB_ABORTED`；否则 `fetch` 使用融合后的 `d.signal` 运行，`translateAbortOrNetwork` 根据信号分类抛出的错误（`timeoutOf` → `WEB_FETCH_TIMEOUT`，否则已中止 → `WEB_ABORTED`，否则网络错误 → `WEB_PROVIDER_ERROR`）。公开的错误码约定不变，`TimeoutReason` 永远不会作为公开错误跨越 web seam。
 - **bash**：`resolve()` 将请求钳位为显式规格。前台 `run()` 创建 deadline 并将其信号传给进程执行，后者既有的 abort 监听器执行进程组 kill。执行器将首个 abort 分类为超时或取消。后台启动保持无超时，仅转发上游取消。
-- **LLM（大语言模型）适配器**：`dsh-llm-deepseek` 和 `dsh-llm-pi-ai` 用 `idleWatchdog` 包装实际的传输迭代。配置的五分钟间隔只覆盖尚未结算的提供方 demand，不包括下游消费方在分片之间花费的时间。稳定信号在整个调用期间传给 `fetch` 或 SDK，因此超时会关闭底层请求并映射为 `TIMEOUT`，而更早的调用方中止映射为 `ABORTED`。
+- **LLM（大语言模型）适配器**：`dsh-llm-deepseek` 和 `dsh-llm-pi-ai` 用 `idleWatchdog` 包装实际的传输迭代。配置的五分钟间隔只覆盖尚未结算的提供方 demand，不包括下游消费方在分片之间花费的时间。DeepSeek 直连适配器还会在其 SSE（Server-Sent Events）解析器观察到注释时，对该项尚未结算的 demand 调用 `pulse()`；该注释既不会作为 `StreamChunk` 产出，也不会写入会话日志。pi-ai SDK 不会向其适配器暴露注释活动，因此该路径只能在 SDK 产出值时重新启动定时器。稳定信号在整个调用期间传给 `fetch` 或 SDK，因此超时会关闭底层请求并映射为 `TIMEOUT`，而更早的调用方中止映射为 `ABORTED`。
 
 ## 后果
 
-- `runBash` 的结果不再独立锁存 `timedOut` 和 `aborted`；超时与用户中止在进程关闭前竞争时，现在报告单一的首个 abort 原因，而非两者同时为 true。统一的 SIGTERM→宽限期→SIGKILL 终止路径不变，seam 类型 `BashRunResult` 保留两个布尔值（现在互斥），因此 `dsh-tool-bash` 的结果渲染不受影响。
-- `SpawnSpec.timeoutMs` 和 `SpawnOutcome.timedOut`/`aborted` 被移除，而非作为始终为零/始终为 false 的残余保留：由于 `runBash` 不再拥有定时器且执行器负责分类，这些字段无处被读取。这是与字面提案形状（向 `runBash` 传入 `timeoutMs: 0`）的唯一偏差；一个始终为 0 且无处读取的字段在逐文件覆盖率门禁下属于死代码。
+- `runBash` 的结果不再独立锁存 `timedOut` 和 `aborted`；超时与用户中止在进程关闭前竞争时，现在报告单一的首个 abort 原因，而非两者同时为 true。统一的 SIGTERM→宽限期→SIGKILL 终止路径不变，Service Definition 类型 `BashRunResult` 保留两个布尔值（现在互斥），因此 `dsh-tool-bash` 的结果渲染不受影响。
+- `SpawnSpec.timeoutMs` 和 `SpawnOutcome.timedOut`/`aborted` 被移除，而非作为始终为零/始终为 false 的残余保留：由于 `runBash` 不再拥有定时器且执行器负责分类，这些字段无处被读取。一个始终为 0 且无处读取的字段在逐文件覆盖率门禁下属于死代码。
 - web_fetch 去除了其定制的 controller/timer/listener/reason-recovery；分类器现在基于 deadline 信号（`timeoutOf` + `aborted`）而非抛出错误的形状来判断，这在请求阶段的 reject-with-reason 和读取阶段的裸 `AbortError` 两种情况下都是健壮的。
 - `AbortSignal.any` 和 `using`/`Symbol.dispose` 在此首次进入本仓库（Node ≥ 24 基线，已满足）。
-- 模型流现在共享一个可重启的定时器契约，不会把滑动的空闲间隔变成总调用截止时间，也不会计入消费方思考时间。该原语仍然只做通知；适配器测试证明其传输观察到稳定信号并终止。
+- 模型流现在共享一个可重启的定时器约定，不会把滑动的空闲间隔变成总调用截止时间，也不会计入消费方思考时间。能够观察到带外传输活动的适配器可以对尚未结算的 demand 调用 `pulse()`；被屏蔽的活动对 watchdog 仍不可见。该原语仍然只做通知；适配器测试证明其传输观察到稳定信号并终止。
 
-以下内容不在本次范围内，列出以标明边界：`web_search` 可以在其工具 schema 和快照覆盖规划完成后获得可选的面向模型的 `timeout_ms`；未来基于 ripgrep 的文件系统发现工具可以在实现后消费同样的提供方自有 deadline 形状；`tools/execute` waterfall（瀑布式事件）中间件可以通过驱动 `exec.signal` 为每次工具调用设置默认 deadline——那将是一个*消费*本库的插件，仍然只做通知，硬终止仍是各能力自己的事。
+以下内容不在本次范围内，列出以标明边界：`web_search` 可以在其工具 schema 和快照覆盖规划完成后获得可选的面向模型的 `timeout_ms`；基于 ripgrep 的文件系统发现工具（[打包的 ripgrep 搜索](2026-08-01-packaged-ripgrep-search.md)）通过 `dsh-timeout-policy` 和 `exec.signal` 消费同样的提供方自有 deadline 形状；`tools/execute` waterfall（瀑布式事件）中间件可以通过驱动 `exec.signal` 为每次工具调用设置默认 deadline——那将是一个*消费*本库的插件，仍然只做通知，硬终止仍是各能力自己的事。
 
 ## 曾考虑的替代方案
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-06-tool-result-retention-library.i18n.yaml

@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-06-tool-result-retention-library.md
 2026-07-06-tool-result-retention-library.md: 5e42660360e5a23b419c75b9c8006bec459bc322
-2026-07-06-tool-result-retention-library.zh.md: 422c301ba5f1aab33a54e1deffe42f390bcb662d
+2026-07-06-tool-result-retention-library.zh.md: 2a523e2eff36daf9100ac10bf5ae569eca30f830

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-06-tool-result-retention-library.zh.md

@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ type TextRetentionStrategy =
 
 ### 工具映射
 
-`read` 被有意排除在 v1 保留库之外。它的 `read-render` 辅助函数拥有文件专用的分页契约：`offset`／`limit`、行号、`totalLines`、offset 越界错误、逐行预览截断，以及能够在窗口中途停止扫描的所选输出字节上限。这是行窗口渲染器，不是通用保留原语。它未来可以共享中性的提示辅助函数，但不应把已经选定的窗口再传入 `ItemRetainer`。
+`read` 被有意排除在 v1 保留库之外。它的 `read-render` 辅助函数拥有文件专用的分页约定：`offset`／`limit`、行号、`totalLines`、offset 越界错误、逐行预览截断，以及能够在窗口中途停止扫描的所选输出字节上限。这是行窗口渲染器，不是通用保留原语。它未来可以共享中性的提示辅助函数，但不应把已经选定的窗口再传入 `ItemRetainer`。
 
 下文的 `FsGlobEntry` 与 `FlatGrepMatch` 是预期由发现工具使用的条目形态，不是现有保留库的导出。`FsGlobEntry` 是一个由后端派生的路径；`FlatGrepMatch` 是后端将保留匹配项按文件分组之前的一条未分组 grep 匹配。
 
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ const formatGrepNotice = (notice: RetentionNotice): string =>
 
 **已交付内容。** `@deepseek-ai/dsh-retention` 导出 `ItemRetainer`、`TextRetainer`、结果类型（`RetainedItems`、`RetainedText`）、策略类型（`ItemRetentionStrategy`、`TextRetentionStrategy`）、`Omitted`、`PushDecision`、`RetentionNotice`，以及中性的提示辅助函数 `describeOmitted`／`formatRetentionNotice`，且不依赖 Cordis 或任何工具包。单元测试覆盖具有精确省略计数的条目头部保留、文本头部保留、文本尾部保留、首尾字节保留、零预算、UTF-8 边界处理（2、3、4 字节码位，以及每个裁切位置上的无效起始字节）和未知省略量的措辞。
 
-**已记录但尚未迁移的内容。** `glob`、`grep`、`bash`、`web_fetch` 与 `web_search` 的映射已记录在[包 README](../../../../packages/util/retention/README.md) 中，但本次改动并未把每个工具都迁移到该库；迁移工作刻意留作独立的后续任务。`read` 被明确记录为不在范围内：其 `read-render` 行窗口契约（`offset`／`limit`、`totalLines`、offset 范围错误、逐行预览截断，以及针对所选窗口的字节上限）不属于通用保留，而一个 `Omitted` 计数也无法同时表达行窗口两侧。
+**已记录但尚未迁移的内容。** `glob`、`grep`、`bash`、`web_fetch` 与 `web_search` 的映射已记录在[包 README](../../../../packages/util/retention/README.md) 中，但本次改动并未把每个工具都迁移到该库；迁移工作刻意留作独立的后续任务。`read` 被明确记录为不在范围内：其 `read-render` 行窗口约定（`offset`／`limit`、`totalLines`、offset 范围错误、逐行预览截断，以及针对所选窗口的字节上限）不属于通用保留，而一个 `Omitted` 计数也无法同时表达行窗口两侧。
 
 **该库维持的边界。** `truncated` 表示 retainer 因预算省略了原本可用的内容，绝不表示上游不完整。工具专用状态，包括 `incomplete`、权限失败、提供方局部失败、跳过二进制文件、bash 落盘路径恢复和无效 UTF-8，均留在工具领域字段中、位于 retainer 之外。未来改动迁移某项工具时，该包的 README 与测试必须证明，除了有意改变的提示措辞外，模型可见的结果文本没有变化。
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-07-tool-call-timeout-policy.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-07-tool-call-timeout-policy.md
-2026-07-07-tool-call-timeout-policy.md: 69fd1ee721de69621d3b57c10d960da0651b94dd
-2026-07-07-tool-call-timeout-policy.zh.md: 0b8d07788dce152985e133923bb673f80175e68d
+2026-07-07-tool-call-timeout-policy.md: f17834332b2e661b6811c2264d5e8de4e1642663
+2026-07-07-tool-call-timeout-policy.zh.md: 3be8614f209b2896f0754cadd868f6e66b78f834

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-07-tool-call-timeout-policy.md

@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ ctx.tools.execute(exec)
 
 The default behavior is conservative: a tool that declares no `timeoutMs` receives no `TOOL_TIMEOUT` deadline from the plugin.
 
-### The `tools/execute` around seam
+### The `tools/execute` around-dispatch extension point
 
 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tools` declares a `tools/execute` waterfall whose base `next()` is the dispatch-with-normalization thunk — the same inner `try`/`catch` that turns a thrown tool (or unknown tool) into an `isError` `ToolExecutionResult`. A listener receives `(exec, next)`: it calls `next()` to delegate to dispatch (returning its result, optionally wrapped) or returns a replacement result to short-circuit dispatch. The whole pipeline still sits inside `execute`'s outer try/catch, so a throwing listener becomes an `isError` result, never a turn failure.
 
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ That the catch is the base `next` — not something outside the waterfall — is
 
 ### The `timeout-policy` plugin
 
-The plugin is `@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout-policy`, a zero-config function/namespace plugin (`name` / `inject` / `apply`) in the `packages/timeout/` group. The per-tool budget is DECLARED on the tool, not on this plugin: a `ToolDefinition` carries an optional `timeoutMs`, which the owning tool plugin sets from its own config. `dsh-tool-web`, for example, resolves `fetchTimeoutMs` / `searchTimeoutMs` (default 30000) onto the `web_fetch` / `web_search` definitions:
+The plugin is `@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout-policy`, a zero-config function/namespace plugin (`name` / `inject` / `apply`) in the `packages/guard/` group (originally its own `timeout/` group). The per-tool budget is DECLARED on the tool, not on this plugin: a `ToolDefinition` carries an optional `timeoutMs`, which the owning tool plugin sets from its own config. `dsh-tool-web`, for example, resolves `fetchTimeoutMs` / `searchTimeoutMs` (default 30000) onto the `web_fetch` / `web_search` definitions:
 
 ```yaml
 - id: timeout-policy
@@ -85,11 +85,11 @@ No new session event is needed for reconstructability: `TOOL_TIMEOUT` is the fin
 
 `read`, `write`, `edit`, `todo_write`, `task_list`, and `task_kill` do not opt into tool-call timeout. `task_output` owns its bounded wait because a wait timeout is a successful live-status result, not a tool failure.
 
-A future model-facing grep/glob tool can be implemented on top of `ctx.bash` without importing `@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout`: it forwards `exec.signal` to `ctx.bash`, and declares its own `timeoutMs` (from its plugin's config) for the enforcer to apply. If bash-local's backend timeout becomes a problem for such a tool, the bash seam can later add a caller-owned-deadline mode; that is outside this cut.
+A future model-facing grep/glob tool can be implemented on top of `ctx.bash` without importing `@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout`: it forwards `exec.signal` to `ctx.bash`, and declares its own `timeoutMs` (from its plugin's config) for the enforcer to apply. If bash-local's backend timeout becomes a problem for such a tool, the bash seam can later add a caller-owned-deadline mode; that is a separate decision.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
-**Name the plugin `tool-timeout`.** The literal Agent Note name matched the `gen-tool-catalog` completeness guard's `packages/*/tool-*` glob, which requires every match to register a model-facing tool. This plugin registers none — it is a `tools/execute` wrapper — so a `tool-*` name would either fail `verify-tool-catalog` or force a misleading boot entry. The package is `@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout-policy` in a new `packages/timeout/` group; the cordis.yml `id` can still be `timeout-policy`.
+**Name the plugin `tool-timeout`.** The literal Agent Note name matched the `gen-tool-catalog` completeness guard's `packages/*/tool-*` glob, which requires every match to register a model-facing tool. This plugin registers none — it is a `tools/execute` wrapper — so a `tool-*` name would either fail `verify-tool-catalog` or force a misleading boot entry. The package is `@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout-policy` in what was then a new `timeout/` group, since folded into `packages/guard/`; the cordis.yml `id` can still be `timeout-policy`.
 
 **Keep per-tool timeout handling only.** This was the shape for `bash` and `web_fetch`, and it matches Claude Code and Codex for shell commands. It loses for web-style tools because every new timeout-capable tool must choose validation, cap semantics, docs, snapshots, and classification. The plugin centralizes policy and classification while leaving each tool's schema focused on business input.
 
@@ -101,14 +101,13 @@ A future model-facing grep/glob tool can be implemented on top of `ctx.bash` wit
 
 **Let `timeout-policy` match tool arguments itself.** A rule engine such as "disable timeout when `bash.run_in_background` is true" would make the policy plugin know tool-specific argument semantics. Avoided by not migrating bash to tool-call timeout.
 
-**Use `tools/pre-execute` plus `tools/post-execute` instead of a new around seam.** A pre listener could arm a deadline and mutate `exec.signal`; a post listener could classify and replace. That loses because the deadline lifetime would cross two independent waterfalls: a call-id map, cleanup on every pre-deny/tool-throw/post-throw/dispose path, and ordering rules with every other listener. `tools/pre-execute` is also the allow/deny gate, not an execution wrapper. `tools/execute` gives the timeout one lexical scope: arm, delegate, classify, dispose.
+**Use `tools/pre-execute` plus `tools/post-execute` instead of a new around-dispatch extension point.** A pre listener could arm a deadline and mutate `exec.signal`; a post listener could classify and replace. That loses because the deadline lifetime would cross two independent waterfalls: a call-id map, cleanup on every pre-deny/tool-throw/post-throw/dispose path, and ordering rules with every other listener. `tools/pre-execute` is also the allow/deny gate, not an execution wrapper. `tools/execute` gives the timeout one lexical scope: arm, delegate, classify, dispose.
 
 **Use `Promise.race` to enforce timeouts for non-cooperative tools.** Rejected for the same reason as the timeout-library Agent Note: it returns control to the caller while the underlying process, fetch, or provider operation may still be running. The plugin only sends a signal; termination remains the implementation's responsibility.
 
 ## Consequences
 
-- `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tools` gains an around-dispatch surface after the interception seams deliberately split pre/post tool hooks. Its contract is narrow — wrap registry dispatch, not replace the pre-gate or post-result policy — and the base `next()` is dispatch-with-normalization so a wrapper never sees a raw tool throw.
+- `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tools` gains an around-dispatch surface after the interception points deliberately split pre/post tool hooks. Its contract is narrow — wrap registry dispatch, not replace the pre-gate or post-result policy — and the base `next()` is dispatch-with-normalization so a wrapper never sees a raw tool throw.
 - Multiple `tools/execute` listeners compose by ordinary Cordis waterfall order: a listener that calls `next()` wraps downstream listeners plus dispatch; one that returns without `next()` short-circuits them. A deployment combining timeout with a future retry/sandbox/metrics wrapper chooses semantics by registration order ("timeout covers the whole retry" vs "timeout covers each attempt").
 - Opt-in by declaration is a deliberate misconfiguration risk: a tool can declare a `timeoutMs` without honoring `exec.signal`, and that tool will not stop on timeout. The registry awaits that non-quiescent body rather than racing it, while the plugin contract states that declaring a budget means cooperative; the web tools prove the pattern on tools that already forward the signal.
 - During the transition `bash` and the migrated web tools use different timeout paths on purpose: `TOOL_TIMEOUT` is the model-facing tool-call budget, while `BASH_TIMEOUT` remains the bash backend timeout used by bash and hooks.
-- Deviation from the literal proposal, recorded per the implemented-Agent Note rule: the plugin package is `@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout-policy` (not `tool-timeout`), signal replacement is in-place `exec.signal` mutation before `next()` (not `next({ ...exec, signal })`, which cordis ignores), and the per-tool budget is declared on the `ToolDefinition` (`timeoutMs`, set by the owning tool plugin from its config) rather than mapped by tool name in this plugin's config — so the enforcer is zero-config and a mistyped tool name is impossible. All three are described in `## Decision` above.

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-07-tool-call-timeout-policy.zh.md

@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ ctx.tools.execute(exec)
 
 默认行为是保守的：未声明 `timeoutMs` 的工具不会从该插件收到 `TOOL_TIMEOUT` 截止信号。
 
-### `tools/execute` 环绕 seam
+### `tools/execute` 环绕分发扩展点
 
 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tools` 声明了一个 `tools/execute` waterfall，其基础 `next()` 是带规范化的分发 thunk——即同一个内部 `try`/`catch`，将抛出的工具错误（或未知工具错误）转换为 `isError` 的 `ToolExecutionResult`。监听器接收 `(exec, next)`：调用 `next()` 委托给分发（返回其结果，可选地包装），或返回替代结果以短路分发。整个流水线仍位于 `execute` 的外层 try/catch 内，因此抛出异常的监听器会变成 `isError` 结果，而非轮次失败。
 
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ catch 是基础 `next`（而非 waterfall 之外的东西）这一点至关重
 
 ### `timeout-policy` 插件
 
-该插件是 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout-policy`，一个零配置的函数/命名空间插件（`name` / `inject` / `apply`），位于 `packages/timeout/` 组。每个工具的预算声明在工具自身，而非本插件：`ToolDefinition` 携带一个可选的 `timeoutMs`，由拥有该工具的插件从自身配置中设置。例如 `dsh-tool-web` 将 `fetchTimeoutMs` / `searchTimeoutMs`（默认 30000）解析到 `web_fetch` / `web_search` 的定义上：
+该插件是 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout-policy`，一个零配置的函数/命名空间插件（`name` / `inject` / `apply`），位于 `packages/guard/` 组。每个工具的预算声明在工具自身，而非本插件：`ToolDefinition` 携带一个可选的 `timeoutMs`，由拥有该工具的插件从自身配置中设置。例如 `dsh-tool-web` 将 `fetchTimeoutMs` / `searchTimeoutMs`（默认 30000）解析到 `web_fetch` / `web_search` 的定义上：
 
 ```yaml
 - id: timeout-policy
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ catch 是基础 `next`（而非 waterfall 之外的东西）这一点至关重
     searchTimeoutMs: 30000
 ```
 
-超时放在工具定义上而非自由文本名称映射中，消除了拼错名称导致策略不生效的问题。`defineTool` 校验预算为正有限数。分发期间，执行器派生截止信号并将其赋给 `exec.signal`；注册表依据[工具取消契约](2026-07-19-cooperative-tool-cancellation.md)，在执行工具体之前将该截止信号与调用方的原始信号融合。执行器随后恢复调用方信号，并将自身的超时转换为 `TOOL_TIMEOUT`；没有预算的工具原样通过。
+超时放在工具定义上而非自由文本名称映射中，消除了拼错名称导致策略不生效的问题。`defineTool` 校验预算为正有限数。分发期间，执行器派生截止信号并将其赋给 `exec.signal`；注册表依据[工具取消约定](2026-07-19-cooperative-tool-cancellation.md)，在执行工具体之前将该截止信号与调用方的原始信号融合。执行器随后恢复调用方信号，并将自身的超时转换为 `TOOL_TIMEOUT`；没有预算的工具原样通过。
 
 信号替换采用**就地修改 `exec.signal`** 的方式，而非向 `next()` 传递新对象。Cordis 的 waterfall `next()` 忽略传入的任何参数，并以共享的 payload 数组重新调用下游监听器（`vendor/cordis/src/events.ts`），因此修改共享对象是包装器向注册表提供截止信号的方式。注册表会在进入工具体前再次融合已捕获的调用方信号；插件则在 `finally` 中将 `exec.signal` 恢复为调用方的原始值，使 `tools/post-execute` 永远不会看到本插件的截止信号。
 
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ function toolTimeoutResult(timeoutMs: number): ToolExecutionResult {
 }
 ```
 
-这是一个协作式截止。它不会通过竞争工具 promise 来杀死任意工作；工具或其调用的能力必须遵循 `exec.signal` 并达到完全停稳。因此声明 `timeoutMs` 意味着「此工具与 `exec.signal` 协作」，插件 README 将此作为其契约。
+这是一个协作式截止。它不会通过竞争工具 promise 来杀死任意工作；工具或其调用的能力必须遵循 `exec.signal` 并达到完全停稳。因此声明 `timeoutMs` 意味着「此工具与 `exec.signal` 协作」，插件 README 将此作为其约定。
 
 无需新的会话事件来保证可重建性：`TOOL_TIMEOUT` 是该调用的最终面向模型的 `tool/result`，因此现有会话日志已经记录了下一次模型请求所见的内容和结构化 `{ name, code }` 错误。
 
@@ -85,11 +85,11 @@ function toolTimeoutResult(timeoutMs: number): ToolExecutionResult {
 
 `read`、`write`、`edit`、`todo_write`、`task_list` 和 `task_kill` 不加入工具调用超时。`task_output` 自己拥有有界等待，因为等待超时是成功的实时状态结果，而非工具失败。
 
-未来面向模型的 grep/glob 工具可以基于 `ctx.bash` 实现而无需导入 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout`：它将 `exec.signal` 转发给 `ctx.bash`，并声明自己的 `timeoutMs`（来自其插件配置）供执行器应用。如果 bash-local 的后端超时对这类工具造成问题，bash seam 可以后续添加调用方自有截止模式；这不在本次范围内。
+未来面向模型的 grep/glob 工具可以基于 `ctx.bash` 实现而无需导入 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout`：它将 `exec.signal` 转发给 `ctx.bash`，并声明自己的 `timeoutMs`（来自其插件配置）供执行器应用。如果 bash-local 的后端超时对这类工具造成问题，bash seam 可以后续添加调用方自有截止模式；那是一项独立的决策。
 
 ## 曾考虑的替代方案
 
-**将插件命名为 `tool-timeout`。** 字面的 Agent Note 名称匹配了 `gen-tool-catalog` 完整性守卫的 `packages/*/tool-*` glob，该 glob 要求每个匹配项注册一个面向模型的工具。本插件不注册任何工具——它是一个 `tools/execute` 包装器——因此 `tool-*` 名称要么导致 `verify-tool-catalog` 失败，要么强制产生一个误导性的启动条目。包为 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout-policy`，位于新的 `packages/timeout/` 组；cordis.yml 的 `id` 仍可为 `timeout-policy`。
+**将插件命名为 `tool-timeout`。** 字面的 Agent Note 名称匹配了 `gen-tool-catalog` 完整性守卫的 `packages/*/tool-*` glob，该 glob 要求每个匹配项注册一个面向模型的工具。本插件不注册任何工具——它是一个 `tools/execute` 包装器——因此 `tool-*` 名称要么导致 `verify-tool-catalog` 失败，要么强制产生一个误导性的启动条目。包为 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout-policy`，位于新的 `packages/guard/` 组；cordis.yml 的 `id` 仍可为 `timeout-policy`。
 
 **仅保留逐工具的超时处理。** 这是 `bash` 和 `web_fetch` 的既有形态，也与 Claude Code 和 Codex 对 shell 命令的做法一致。它对 web 类工具不利，因为每个新的支持超时的工具都必须自行选择校验方式、上限语义、文档、快照和分类。插件集中了策略和分类，让每个工具的 schema 专注于业务输入。
 
@@ -101,14 +101,13 @@ function toolTimeoutResult(timeoutMs: number): ToolExecutionResult {
 
 **让 `timeout-policy` 自行匹配工具参数。** 诸如「当 `bash.run_in_background` 为 true 时禁用超时」之类的规则引擎会让策略插件了解工具特定的参数语义。通过不将 bash 迁移到工具调用超时来规避此问题。
 
-**使用 `tools/pre-execute` 加 `tools/post-execute` 代替新的环绕 seam。** pre 监听器可以启动截止时间并修改 `exec.signal`；post 监听器可以分类并替换。这样做的问题是截止时间的生命周期会跨越两个独立的 waterfall：需要 call-id 映射、在每条 pre-deny/tool-throw/post-throw/dispose（资源释放）路径上清理，以及与其他监听器的排序规则。`tools/pre-execute` 也是允许/拒绝门禁，而非执行包装器。`tools/execute` 给超时一个词法作用域：启动、委托、分类、释放。
+**使用 `tools/pre-execute` 加 `tools/post-execute` 代替新的环绕分发扩展点。** pre 监听器可以启动截止时间并修改 `exec.signal`；post 监听器可以分类并替换。这样做的问题是截止时间的生命周期会跨越两个独立的 waterfall：需要 call-id 映射、在每条 pre-deny/tool-throw/post-throw/dispose（资源释放）路径上清理，以及与其他监听器的排序规则。`tools/pre-execute` 也是允许/拒绝门禁，而非执行包装器。`tools/execute` 给超时一个词法作用域：启动、委托、分类、释放。
 
 **使用 `Promise.race` 对非协作工具强制超时。** 与超时库 Agent Note 相同的理由否决：它在底层进程、fetch 或提供方操作可能仍在运行时就将控制权返回给调用方。插件只发送信号；终止仍是实现方的责任。
 
 ## 后果
 
-- `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tools` 在有意拆分 pre/post 工具钩子的拦截 seam 之后，获得了一个环绕分发接口。其契约是狭窄的——包装注册表分发，而非替代 pre 门禁或 post 结果策略——且基础 `next()` 是带规范化的分发，因此包装器永远不会看到未经处理的工具异常。
+- `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tools` 在拦截点有意拆分 pre/post 工具钩子之后，获得了一个环绕分发接口。其约定是狭窄的——包装注册表分发，而非替代 pre 门禁或 post 结果策略——且基础 `next()` 是带规范化的分发，因此包装器永远不会看到未经处理的工具异常。
 - 多个 `tools/execute` 监听器按普通 Cordis waterfall 顺序组合：调用 `next()` 的监听器包装下游监听器加分发；不调用 `next()` 直接返回的监听器短路它们。一个同时组合超时与未来重试/沙箱/指标包装器的部署通过注册顺序选择语义（「超时覆盖整个重试」vs「超时覆盖每次尝试」）。
-- 按声明加入是一个有意的误配置风险：工具可以声明 `timeoutMs` 但不遵循 `exec.signal`，这样的工具在超时时不会停止。注册表会等待这个尚未完全停稳的工具体结束，而不是与它竞速；同时插件契约声明：声明预算意味着协作；web 工具在已转发信号的工具上验证了这一模式。
+- 按声明加入是一个有意的误配置风险：工具可以声明 `timeoutMs` 但不遵循 `exec.signal`，这样的工具在超时时不会停止。注册表会等待这个尚未完全停稳的工具体结束，而不是与它竞速；同时插件约定声明：声明预算意味着协作；web 工具在已转发信号的工具上验证了这一模式。
 - 过渡期间 `bash` 和已迁移的 web 工具有意使用不同的超时路径：`TOOL_TIMEOUT` 是面向模型的工具调用预算，而 `BASH_TIMEOUT` 仍是 bash 和钩子使用的 bash 后端超时。
-- 与字面提案的偏差，按 implemented-Agent Note 规则记录：插件包为 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout-policy`（而非 `tool-timeout`）；信号替换是在 `next()` 之前就地修改 `exec.signal`（而非 `next({ ...exec, signal })`，Cordis 会忽略后者）；逐工具预算声明在 `ToolDefinition` 上（`timeoutMs`，由拥有该工具的插件从其配置中设置），而非在本插件配置中按工具名映射——因此执行器是零配置的，拼错工具名不可能发生。以上三点均在上文 `## Decision` 中描述。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-08-agent-scope-contexts.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-08-agent-scope-contexts.md
-2026-07-08-agent-scope-contexts.md: 5e09bdbcae1e57e6b65eb7d1720a6e7a7f758a9f
-2026-07-08-agent-scope-contexts.zh.md: 4714045f28e0386a3a53b53437d063462e75a9f1
+2026-07-08-agent-scope-contexts.md: eb3f6f247bac1a1d81aa2644132c7b9cc04d602c
+2026-07-08-agent-scope-contexts.zh.md: fe82ac18d07de97330e86461e6bdf86edc37d2ae

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-08-agent-scope-contexts.md

@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ An event about Agent A normally reaches unscoped listeners and A-scoped listener
 
 At the Cordis level, `Scoped<T>` is an opaque routing receiver. It carries the filter used to choose listeners but is not the domain object. Event signatures therefore keep the real `Agent`, tool execution, approval request, or other subject as an explicit argument that listeners can inspect.
 
-A listener registered with `{ global: true }` deliberately bypasses contextual audience filtering while its cleanup still follows the registering context. Registry-membership notifications remain unfiltered because they describe shared registry state rather than one agent's operation. The generated [event catalog](../../../../docs/cordis-catalog/events.md) is the exhaustive event reference.
+A listener registered with `{ global: true }` deliberately bypasses contextual audience filtering while its cleanup still follows the registering context. Registry-membership notifications remain unfiltered because they describe shared registry state rather than one agent's operation. The exhaustive event reference is the set of generated `cordis-surface` regions across the [subsystem pages](../../../../docs/subsystems/core.md) — each event scope on its owning page (`agent/*` and `agent-loop/*` on core.md itself).
 
 ### Creation publishes last and disposal revokes last
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-08-agent-scope-contexts.zh.md

@@ -18,14 +18,14 @@ Status: implemented
 
 Cordis 是 SDK 底层的插件框架。Cordis **上下文**是插件用来访问服务和注册效果的对象，效果的清理跟随该上下文。[Cordis 入门](../../../../docs/cordis-primer.md)对该框架有更详细的说明。
 
-对大多数贡献者而言，完整契约是四条规则：
+对大多数贡献者而言，完整约定是四条规则：
 
 | 问题 | 规则 |
 |---|---|
 | 在哪里为某个 agent 注册行为？ | 通过 `agent.ctx` 调用普通注册 API |
 | 某个 agent 的操作能看到什么？ | 部署全局加上该 agent 的层，按所属服务的合并规则 |
 | 哪些作用域监听器会运行？ | 无作用域监听器加上为该操作所属 agent 注册的监听器 |
-| 该层存在多久？ | setup 在发布前完成；dispose 保留该层直到工作完全停稳 |
+| 该层存在多久？ | setup 在发布前完成；dispose（资源释放）保留该层直到工作完全停稳 |
 
 作用域是扁平的。解析永远不会遍历父级或兄弟作用域，生命周期所有权也不意味着注册继承。
 
@@ -49,14 +49,14 @@ flowchart LR
 
 ### 注册来源决定可见性与清理
 
-通过普通插件上下文进行的注册是部署全局的，随该插件一起 dispose（资源释放）。同一方法通过 `agent.ctx` 调用则贡献给一个 agent，随该 agent 的作用域一起 dispose。
+通过普通插件上下文进行的注册是部署全局的，随该插件一起 dispose。同一方法通过 `agent.ctx` 调用则贡献给一个 agent，随该 agent 的作用域一起 dispose。
 
 | 注册来源 | 默认可见性 | 随谁 dispose |
 |---|---|---|
 | 普通插件上下文 | 每个符合条件的 agent 视图 | 注册插件 |
 | `agent.ctx` | 仅该 agent 的视图 | agent 作用域 |
 
-工具、提示词段落与变量、工具限制、守卫以及作用域事件监听器都遵循此契约。命名的本地值通常对该 agent 遮蔽同名全局值；各所属服务文档会说明例外与合并行为。
+工具、提示词段落与变量、工具限制、守卫以及作用域事件监听器都遵循此约定。命名的本地值通常对该 agent 遮蔽同名全局值；各所属服务文档会说明例外与合并行为。
 
 普通贡献者的模式是在 agent setup 期间注册完整的本地世界：
 
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ await handle.dispose()
 ctx.tools.get('review_summary', handle.agent)  // undefined: scope is gone
 ```
 
-setup 接收一个完整的受信 Cordis 上下文，因此可以组合普通插件和服务。其契约仅限组合：不支持通过 cast 或内部注册表调用来驱动或发布正在构建中的 agent。
+setup 接收一个完整的受信 Cordis 上下文，因此可以组合普通插件和服务。其约定仅限组合：不支持通过 cast 或内部注册表调用来驱动或发布正在构建中的 agent。
 
 ### 操作选择视图
 
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ setup 接收一个完整的受信 Cordis 上下文，因此可以组合普通插
 
 工具查找与执行接收其所服务的 agent。提示词组装接收正在构建请求的 agent 的组装上下文。事件分发接收其领域主体。这使共享服务实例可在多个 agent 间复用，同时让每个操作的视图保持显式。
 
-只有采纳了作用域契约的服务才会解析 agent 层。`agent.ctx` 不会自动改变任意 Cordis 服务调用的行为。
+只有采纳了作用域约定的服务才会解析 agent 层。`agent.ctx` 不会自动改变任意 Cordis 服务调用的行为。
 
 ### 作用域事件将路由与事件数据分离
 
@@ -104,17 +104,17 @@ setup 接收一个完整的受信 Cordis 上下文，因此可以组合普通插
 
 在 Cordis 层面，`Scoped<T>` 是一个不透明的路由接收器。它携带用于选择监听器的过滤器，但本身不是领域对象。因此事件签名将真实的 `Agent`、工具执行、审批请求或其他主体作为显式参数保留，供监听器检查。
 
-以 `{ global: true }` 注册的监听器有意绕过上下文受众过滤，但其清理仍跟随注册上下文。注册表成员变更通知保持不过滤，因为它们描述的是共享注册表状态而非某个 agent 的操作。生成的[事件目录](../../../../docs/cordis-catalog/events.md)是详尽的事件参考。
+以 `{ global: true }` 注册的监听器有意绕过上下文受众过滤，但其清理仍跟随注册上下文。注册表成员变更通知保持不过滤，因为它们描述的是共享注册表状态而非某个 agent 的操作。详尽的事件参考是各[子系统页面](../../../../docs/subsystems/core.md)上生成的 `cordis-surface` 区块的集合——每个事件作用域在其所属页面上（`agent/*` 与 `agent-loop/*` 在 core.md 本页）。
 
 ### 创建最后发布，dispose 最后撤销
 
-`ctx.agents.create()` 和 `resume()` 构建未发布的会话、作用域、agent 和驱动器。它们等待 `setup`，同步调用其可选的 `AgentSetupCommit`，准入最终的会话和 agent 条目，按序公告，启动循环，然后才返回 handle。该提交操作让可变的配置状态在所有 setup 的 await 均结算后，于确切的发布边界重新校验；若其抛出异常，则会在公告任何一个身份前回滚私有事务，而成功提交后的撤销属于普通的实时拆卸。
+`ctx.agents.create()` 和 `resume()` 构建未发布的会话、作用域、agent 和驱动器。它们等待 `setup`，同步调用其可选的 `AgentSetupCommit`，准入最终的会话和 agent 条目，按序公告，启动循环，然后才返回 handle。该提交操作让可变的配置状态在所有 setup 的 await 均结算后，于确切的发布边界重新校验；若其抛出异常，则会在公告任何一个身份前回滚私有事务，而成功提交后的撤销属于普通的存活期拆除。
 
 可选的创建信号仅在创建或恢复挂起期间取消工作。promise resolve 后，返回的 `AgentHandle` 拥有显式 dispose 权。
 
 如果加载、setup、可选的 setup 提交、准入或发布失败，私有事务回滚其准备的一切。使用同一个调用方提供的存活 ID 的并发操作可能都到达 setup，但最终注册表条目只准入一个；每个失败者拒绝并清理其私有资源。在等待 dispose 完成后的顺序复用仍然有效。
 
-`AgentHandle.dispose()` 反转边界。它停用创建或驱动，等待同步发布解除，停止并排空驱动器和最终会话刷写，分离 agent 和会话，最后 dispose 作用域。重复或竞争的 dispose 请求合并为一个完成 promise。
+`AgentHandle.dispose()` 反转边界。它停用创建或驱动，等待同步发布完成退栈，停止并排空驱动器和最终会话刷写，分离 agent 和会话，最后 dispose 作用域。重复或竞争的 dispose 请求合并为一个完成 promise。
 
 调用方的 Cordis 上下文和具体的 AgentLoop 工厂是结构性共同所有者。卸载任一方都会 dispose 事务或存活 agent。
 
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ agent 作用域组合的是受信的同进程注册。它不沙箱化插件、
 
 ### 向每个注册传递 agent 选项
 
-类似 `tools.register(definition, { agent })` 的 API 在每个注册表中重复作用域管道，且允许可见性所有权与清理所有权漂移。通过 `agent.ctx` 注册使两个事实跟随同一个 Cordis effect owner。
+类似 `tools.register(definition, { agent })` 的 API 在每个注册表中重复作用域传递逻辑，且允许可见性所有权与清理所有权漂移。通过 `agent.ctx` 注册使两个事实跟随同一个 Cordis effect owner。
 
 ### 过滤事件但保持注册表全局
 
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ agent 作用域组合的是受信的同进程注册。它不沙箱化插件、
 
 ### 为每个 agent 创建独立的服务图
 
-所需的视图是共享部署服务加上一个本地注册层。每 agent 一个图会重复适配器，并使共享持久化、提供方注册表和应用启动复杂化。
+所需的视图是共享部署服务加上一个本地注册层。每个 agent 一个服务图会重复适配器，并使共享持久化、提供方注册表和应用启动复杂化。
 
 ### 继承父级注册作用域
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-08-tool-output-spill-files.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-08-tool-output-spill-files.md
-2026-07-08-tool-output-spill-files.md: 7c0ca90452645d251559be25108d12883210d00e
-2026-07-08-tool-output-spill-files.zh.md: a1bde1131374cd11215006b822dfc19aea707747
+2026-07-08-tool-output-spill-files.md: 0c8e5e25fc8a229db8fca36512ba781e548b5256
+2026-07-08-tool-output-spill-files.zh.md: 771253335bf5822cb855c63e7dd0bbf0d517bab3

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-08-tool-output-spill-files.md

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ A thin spill storage seam plus a default spill policy plugin, in a new `packages
 | `@deepseek-ai/dsh-spill-local` | Local backend: private, session-scoped file storage on the host filesystem. |
 | `@deepseek-ai/dsh-spill-policy` | Tool-result policy plugin: wraps final text results after dispatch and replaces oversized results with a retained preview plus a spill locator. |
 
-There is no dedicated model-facing consumer package. The consumer is the existing `ctx.tools` execution pipeline: `dsh-spill-policy` consumes final tool results through the `tools/post-execute` waterfall, and the model follows the backend-supplied retrieval hint for the returned locator.
+There is no dedicated model-facing Consumer package. The Consumer is the existing `ctx.tools` execution pipeline: `dsh-spill-policy` consumes final tool results through the `tools/post-execute` waterfall, and the model follows the backend-supplied retrieval hint for the returned locator.
 
 ### Spill seam
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-08-tool-output-spill-files.zh.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 这项改动之前的行为并不一致。`dsh-bash-local` 已经会在内存尾部溢出时，把完整 stdout／stderr 流写入私有的临时落盘文件；普通文本工具结果则仍以内联形式返回，除非工具自行实现上限。[工具结果保留库](2026-07-06-tool-result-retention-library.md)负责预览机制，但不负责存储，也不负责把这些机制应用于最终工具结果的执行流水线策略。
 
-其形态与超时策略设计一致：工具作者声明规范值与 Native renderer（原生渲染器），由策略插件在渲染后的内容上执行部署默认的上下文预算。工具仍可在提供方采集上限处提前落盘；由工具负责的展示落盘可以保留已完整采集的规范值，而只替换展示内容。[规范工具输出契约](2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.md)规定了这项区分。
+其形态与超时策略设计一致：工具作者声明规范值与 Native renderer（原生渲染器），由策略插件在渲染后的内容上执行部署默认的上下文预算。工具仍可在提供方采集上限处提前落盘；由工具负责的展示落盘可以保留已完整采集的规范值，而只替换展示内容。[规范工具输出约定](2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.md)规定了这项区分。
 
 ## 决策
 
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Status: implemented
 | `@deepseek-ai/dsh-spill-local` | 本地后端：在宿主文件系统中提供私有、会话作用域的文件存储。 |
 | `@deepseek-ai/dsh-spill-policy` | 工具结果策略插件：包装分发后的最终文本结果，并以保留预览和落盘定位符替换超大结果。 |
 
-系统不增加专用的面向模型消费方包。消费方是现有 `ctx.tools` 执行流水线：`dsh-spill-policy` 通过 `tools/post-execute` waterfall（瀑布式事件）使用最终工具结果，模型则按照后端随定位符返回的检索提示读取内容。
+系统不增加专用的面向模型 Consumer 包。Consumer 是现有 `ctx.tools` 执行流水线：`dsh-spill-policy` 通过 `tools/post-execute` waterfall（瀑布式事件）使用最终工具结果，模型则按照后端随定位符返回的检索提示读取内容。
 
 ### 落盘 seam
 
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ ctx.tools.register(defineTool({
 
 ## 测试
 
-- `dsh-spill` 单元测试锁定 seam 契约：注册为 `ctx.spillStore`、每个上下文只允许一种实现，并在 dispose（资源释放）时释放。
+- `dsh-spill` 单元测试锁定 seam 约定：注册为 `ctx.spillStore`、每个上下文只允许一种实现，并在 dispose（资源释放）时释放。
 - `dsh-spill-local` 单元测试覆盖 `saveText`、`encodeSegment` 清理（分隔符／波浪号／完整路径段的点／空值）、会话哈希目录、仅所有者权限、每次保存生成不同路径、配置根目录／私有根目录，以及存储失败时的拒绝。
 - `dsh-spill-policy` 单元测试通过 `ctx.tools.execute` 驱动真实工具：禁用模式下无操作、替换超大文本、小结果／非文本结果保持不变、跳过 `read`、尽力回退（保存失败／无后端／无所有者），以及下游组合（限制已替换结果、保留 `additionalContexts`）。
 - `dsh-tool-web` 集成测试驱动 `web_fetch`，其实际执行路径经过 `ctx.tools.execute`，并使用真实的 `spill-local` 后端与策略；测试证明只有刻意加入的落盘提示会改变模型可见文本，而落盘文件保存完整的格式化结果。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md
-2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md: 6fbd5e2c9d57da3f25c72c652ca50eb45b84323c
-2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.zh.md: c46b3eeeb446165192ef44de938c9a5a657a02f8
+2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md: 08715d3ad6ad7a2346327861e7134b10da184f00
+2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.zh.md: 77b57274d0d931f0ec58fecd3d5f9ca5bba3f624

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recove
 
 ## Problem
 
-`agent/pre-step` runs before final request routing and before assistant output, tool results, buffered context, and steering exist. Even with the assembled prompt and session prefix, its pressure view is provisional because `agent/request` can still change routing or call configuration and tool schemas are not frozen with those inputs. Adding fields cannot make pre-call state describe a completed call and couples the generic seam to compaction.
+`agent/pre-step` runs before final request routing and before assistant output, tool results, buffered context, and steering exist. Even with the assembled prompt and session prefix, its pressure view is provisional because `agent/request` can still change routing or call configuration and tool schemas are not frozen with those inputs. Adding fields cannot make pre-call state describe a completed call and couples the generic extension point to compaction.
 
 Successful calls are not the only pressure signal. A provider can reject a request for exceeding its context window before it returns usage, and some successful calls omit usage. The system therefore needs replayable post-call pressure plus a narrow failure-recovery path that preserves the provider error whenever compaction cannot prove useful progress.
 
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ If cancellation lands after assistant tool calls are durable but before all call
 
 `CompactService.compactIfNeeded(agent, trigger, signal)` accepts `trigger: 'pressure' | 'context-overflow'`. The interface gains no estimation methods or token types; `ctx.tokenMeter` remains the reusable accounting owner.
 
-For `pressure`, compact-basic resolves the durable provider/model target's adapter-owned capacity and exact-target policy, then applies the resulting threshold and retained-tail budgets to one unified `ctx.tokenMeter.measure()` result. Below pressure it returns without pruning. Once pressure qualifies, optional `ctx.toolResultPrune` rewrites oversized current results and compact-basic remeasures through the same meter; safe pressure skips the model call, while remaining pressure selects and summarizes from the pruned surface. The same singleton meter owns range pricing, provenance, shadowed token counts, and non-shrinking-summary rejection. Common defaults remain threshold ratio `0.8`, retained-history ratio `0.16`, summarization provider/model `''`, `maxTokens: 8192`, `compactionRetries: 1`, and `auto: true`; optional `modelPolicies` entries override them for an exact provider/model pair.
+For `pressure`, compact-basic resolves the durable provider/model target's adapter-owned capacity and exact-target policy, then applies the resulting threshold and retained-tail budgets to one unified `ctx.tokenMeter.measure()` result. Below pressure it returns without pruning. Once pressure qualifies, optional `ctx.toolResultPrune` rewrites oversized current results and compact-basic remeasures through the same meter; safe pressure skips the model call, while remaining pressure selects and summarizes from the pruned surface. The same singleton meter owns range pricing, cited source-event accounting, shadowed token counts, and non-shrinking-summary rejection. Common defaults remain threshold ratio `0.8`, retained-history ratio `0.16`, summarization provider/model `''`, `maxTokens: 8192`, `compactionRetries: 1`, and `auto: true`; optional `modelPolicies` entries override them for an exact provider/model pair.
 
 For canonical overflow, compact-basic requires no capacity metadata and bypasses scalar pressure and the normal retained-token budget. It prunes first, then chooses the maximal tool-balanced head range while leaving the newest indivisible unit and attempts one shrinking summary compaction under the same signal when a range exists. The automatic listener snapshots `session.surface.replaceGeneration` and returns `{ kind: 'retry' }` whenever pruning or summarization increases it. This remains true when pruning lands before later summary work throws; cancellation still wins. A backend returning a result without replacement cannot authorize retry, while pruning-only progress can authorize a retry without a `CompactionResult`.
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.zh.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 问题
 
-`agent/pre-step` 运行在最终请求路由之前，也早于 assistant 输出、工具结果、缓冲上下文与 steering（中途引导）的产生。即使它接收已装配提示词与会话前缀，压力视图仍是临时的，因为 `agent/request` 还可以改变路由或调用配置，工具 schema 也没有与这些输入一同冻结。增加字段无法让调用前状态描述已完成调用，还会把通用 seam 与压缩耦合。
+`agent/pre-step` 运行在最终请求路由之前，也早于 assistant 输出、工具结果、缓冲上下文与 steering（中途引导）的产生。即使它接收已装配提示词与会话前缀，压力视图仍是临时的，因为 `agent/request` 还可以改变路由或调用配置，工具 schema 也没有与这些输入一同冻结。增加字段无法让调用前状态描述已完成调用，还会把通用扩展点与压缩耦合。
 
 成功调用也不是唯一的压力信号。提供方可能在返回 usage 之前就因上下文窗口超限拒绝请求，一些成功调用也不提供 usage。因此，系统需要可回放的调用后压力，以及一条狭窄的失败恢复路径；当压缩无法证明取得有效进展时，必须保留原始提供方错误。
 
@@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ Compact-basic 会在每个拟议请求之前包装 `agent/pre-step`。在续步
 
 ### 请求恢复只覆盖最终模型边界
 
-`agent/request-error` 表示来自最终适配器边界的终止失败。适配器选择、分发、iterator 构造与迭代抛出会在 agent loop 消费前成为终止 `error` 或 `aborted` finish；适配器直接发出的终止 finish 进入同一路径。提示词装配、请求 middleware、请求日志、结果处理、工具、step 监听器与清理仍属于普通失败。[LLM 流的终止失败](2026-07-29-terminal-llm-stream-failures.md)规定这一规范化边界。
+`agent/request-error` 表示来自最终适配器边界的终止失败。适配器选择、分发、iterator 构造与迭代抛出会在 agent loop（智能体循环）消费前成为终止 `error` 或 `aborted` finish；适配器直接发出的终止 finish 进入同一路径。提示词装配、请求 middleware、请求日志、结果处理、工具、step 监听器与清理仍属于普通失败。[LLM（大语言模型）流的终止失败](2026-07-29-terminal-llm-stream-failures.md)规定这一规范化边界。
 
-恢复运行前，失败 step 已经关闭。负责处理的监听器修复持久状态、返回 `{ kind: 'retry' }`，并停止 waterfall 委托。循环随后关闭失败 turn，并从持久日志开启一个重试 turn，中间不发布空闲通知。重试策略与尝试计数由插件自己拥有；compact-basic 在链路到达终态 `agent/settled` 时清除对应 agent 的溢出计数。两个 DeepSeek 适配器都把识别出的提供方上下文限制错误规范化为 `CONTEXT_WINDOW_EXCEEDED`。[重试动作决策](../simplification/2026-07-27-request-error-retry-action.md)规定这一返回边界。
+恢复运行前，失败 step 已经关闭。负责处理的监听器修复持久状态、返回 `{ kind: 'retry' }`，并停止 waterfall（瀑布式事件）委托。循环随后关闭失败 turn，并从持久日志开启一个重试 turn，中间不发布空闲通知。重试策略与尝试计数由插件自己拥有；compact-basic 在链路到达终态 `agent/settled` 时清除对应 agent 的溢出计数。两个 DeepSeek 适配器都把识别出的提供方上下文限制错误规范化为 `CONTEXT_WINDOW_EXCEEDED`。[重试动作决策](../simplification/2026-07-27-request-error-retry-action.md)规定这一返回边界。
 
 如果取消发生在 assistant 工具调用已经持久化之后、所有调用完成分发之前，循环会为每个尚未分发的调用记录一对合成的 `tool/call` 与 aborted `tool/result`，随后进入正常中止路径。因此，表层不会仅因取消赢得竞态而留下孤立的持久工具调用。
 
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Compact-basic 会在每个拟议请求之前包装 `agent/pre-step`。在续步
 
 `CompactService.compactIfNeeded(agent, trigger, signal)` 接收 `trigger: 'pressure' | 'context-overflow'`。接口不增加估算方法或 token 类型；`ctx.tokenMeter` 继续作为可复用的核算所有者。
 
-对于 `pressure`，compact-basic 先解析持久提供方/模型目标对应适配器所维护的容量与精确目标策略，再把得到的阈值与保留尾部预算应用到一次统一的 `ctx.tokenMeter.measure()` 结果。未达到压力阈值时直接返回，不执行剪枝。压力达到条件后，可选的 `ctx.toolResultPrune` 会改写当前表层中过大的工具结果，compact-basic 再通过同一个 meter 重新计量；若压力已降至安全水平则跳过模型调用，否则从已剪枝表层选择范围并生成摘要。范围定价、来源、被遮蔽 token 数与非缩小摘要拒绝也由同一个单例 meter 完成。通用默认值保持为阈值比例 `0.8`、保留历史比例 `0.16`、摘要提供方/模型 `''`、`maxTokens: 8192`、`compactionRetries: 1` 与 `auto: true`；可选 `modelPolicies` 项可以按精确提供方/模型组合覆盖这些值。
+对于 `pressure`，compact-basic 先解析持久提供方/模型目标对应适配器所维护的容量与精确目标策略，再把得到的阈值与保留尾部预算应用到一次统一的 `ctx.tokenMeter.measure()` 结果。未达到压力阈值时直接返回，不执行剪枝。压力达到条件后，可选的 `ctx.toolResultPrune` 会改写当前表层中过大的工具结果，compact-basic 再通过同一个 meter 重新计量；若压力已降至安全水平则跳过模型调用，否则从已剪枝表层选择范围并生成摘要。范围定价、引用的源事件计量、被遮蔽 token 数与非缩小摘要拒绝也由同一个单例 meter 完成。通用默认值保持为阈值比例 `0.8`、保留历史比例 `0.16`、摘要提供方/模型 `''`、`maxTokens: 8192`、`compactionRetries: 1` 与 `auto: true`；可选 `modelPolicies` 项可以按精确提供方/模型组合覆盖这些值。
 
 对于规范化溢出，compact-basic 不要求容量元数据，并绕过标量压力与普通保留 token 预算。它先执行剪枝，再在保留最新不可分割单元的同时选择最大的工具配对平衡头部范围；存在范围时，才在同一 signal 下尝试一次缩小摘要压缩。自动监听器先记录 `session.surface.replaceGeneration`，剪枝或摘要让 generation 增加时就返回 `{ kind: 'retry' }`。即使剪枝先落盘而后续摘要工作抛错，这条规则仍然成立；取消依然优先。后端若只返回结果但没有替换表层，不能授权重试；只有剪枝取得进展时，即使没有 `CompactionResult` 也可以授权重试。
 
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Compact-basic 会在每个拟议请求之前包装 `agent/pre-step`。在续步
 
 ## 测试
 
-单元测试覆盖最终适配器规范化边界、已关闭 turn 的重试编号与重置、取消与销毁、step 边界顺序、已路由信封压力、压力门控剪枝、剪枝独立解除压力、从已剪枝输入生成摘要、平衡溢出缩减、后续失败前已落盘的剪枝进展、generation 证明、上限、委托与辅助调用路由。真实循环测试覆盖抛出式和带内溢出，并验证剪枝或摘要压缩后的重试请求从替换表层重建。
+单元测试覆盖最终适配器规范化边界、已关闭 turn 的重试编号与重置、取消与销毁、step 边界顺序、已路由信封压力、压力门控剪枝、剪枝独立解除压力、从已剪枝输入生成摘要、平衡溢出缩减、后续失败前已落盘的剪枝进展、generation 证明、上限、委托与辅助调用路由。真实循环测试覆盖抛出式和带内溢出在经剪枝或摘要压缩后重建重试请求的过程。
 
 ## 考虑过的替代方案
 
@@ -58,4 +58,4 @@ Compact-basic 会在每个拟议请求之前包装 `agent/pre-step`。在续步
 
 代价是在共享 pre-step waterfall 中执行压力工作，并需要适配器持续维护溢出分类。提供方措辞与启发式字符密度仍是维护风险。表层压缩依然无法修复仅信封本身就超出窗口的情况，也不能拆分不可分割的非工具节点，或修复非可剪枝剩余部分仍然过大的工具单元。若可移除的文本工具结果是主要体积，可选剪枝器仍可修复原本不可分割的工具配对。
 
-[已领取 pre-step 生命周期](2026-07-31-claimed-pre-step-inbox-lifecycle.md)取代了本记录原先的 post-step 触发方式。服务拆分、独立 token meter、平衡范围契约、日志记录锁、摘要替换与唯一 `summarize()` 子类 hook 均保持不变。
+[已领取 pre-step 生命周期](2026-07-31-claimed-pre-step-inbox-lifecycle.md)取代了本记录原先的 post-step 触发方式。服务拆分、独立 token meter、平衡范围约定、日志记录锁、摘要替换与唯一 `summarize()` 子类 hook 均保持不变。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-10-single-file-executable-sdk-runtime-distribution.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-10-single-file-executable-sdk-runtime-distribution.md
-2026-07-10-single-file-executable-sdk-runtime-distribution.md: f3da981c478ef08672a82f23ab9cd42e0f38ebab
-2026-07-10-single-file-executable-sdk-runtime-distribution.zh.md: 5a8e15aab79875bdb08e6347199924c4215a2705
+2026-07-10-single-file-executable-sdk-runtime-distribution.md: a45678c9bb5fcae340ff7134687890879f56c630
+2026-07-10-single-file-executable-sdk-runtime-distribution.zh.md: f1fccc508471356dd6434da0e126ed38f15ed3ba

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-10-single-file-executable-sdk-runtime-distribution.md

@@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ Terminology reminder: pkg's `/snapshot` VFS has nothing to do with this repo's t
 
 The deterministic protocol implementation (`server.ts` / `transport.ts`) lands as two packages on the existing `acp/acp` + `examples/acp-demo` pattern — the serving surface is itself a plugin:
 
-- [`packages/ui/jsonrpc`](../../../../packages/ui/jsonrpc/README.md) (`@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc`): the pure protocol plugin; on apply it mounts `HarnessSdkServer` plus a line-delimited JSON-RPC transport on the process stdio, with disposal through `ctx.effect()`. Whether to serve is decided by `cordis.yml`; a yml that does not mount it is a legitimate process that does not serve. Protocol-level exit belongs to the plugin (after answering and flushing the `shutdown` response it disposes the root runtime so persistence drains, then `exit(0)`; an HMR-style unload only stops the service without exiting the process).
-- [`packages/examples/jsonrpc-demo`](../../../../packages/examples/jsonrpc-demo/README.md) (`@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc-demo`): a thin app bin — `installFailLoud` + `loadEnv` + config discovery + `boot()` from [`dsh-app-boot`](../../../../packages/ui/app-boot/src/index.ts), done once boot completes; the server is brought up by the `dsh-jsonrpc` entry in the yml. Its only dependency is app-boot. Process-level exit belongs to the bin (stdin EOF/SIGTERM → dispose then 0, SIGINT → 130).
+- [`packages/scaffold/server`](../../../../packages/scaffold/server/README.md) (`@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc`): the pure protocol plugin; on apply it mounts `HarnessSdkServer` plus a line-delimited JSON-RPC transport on the process stdio, with disposal through `ctx.effect()`. Whether to serve is decided by `cordis.yml`; a yml that does not mount it is a legitimate process that does not serve. Protocol-level exit belongs to the plugin (after answering and flushing the `shutdown` response it disposes the root runtime so persistence drains, then `exit(0)`; an HMR-style unload only stops the service without exiting the process).
+- [`packages/examples/jsonrpc-demo`](../../../../packages/examples/jsonrpc-demo/README.md) (`@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc-demo`): a thin app bin — `installFailLoud` + `loadEnv` + config discovery + `boot()` from [`dsh-app-boot`](../../../../packages/boot/app-boot/src/index.ts), done once boot completes; the server is brought up by the `dsh-jsonrpc` entry in the yml. Its only dependency is app-boot. Process-level exit belongs to the bin (stdin EOF/SIGTERM → dispose then 0, SIGINT → 130).
 
 Config discovery has two channels and fails loudly when both are missing: the `DSH_CORDIS_CONFIG` environment variable first (the SDK client convention), then an argv positional argument; no default path and no built-in fallback whatsoever — "the plugins actually booted are decided by an external cordis.yml" is a hard semantic.
 
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ Manual-driving caveat: the bin treats stdin EOF as "the client is gone" and disp
 
 **jsonrpc-agent carrying the full closure dependencies.** The app bin would declare 53+ dependencies it never imports — a "packaging manifest" masquerading as real dependency relationships — and would force constraints to open two exceptions for it, cordis-in-dependencies and a files wildcard. With the closure manifest landing on the python-side manifest package, constraints needs no exception at all and the bin keeps the normal package shape isomorphic to acp-agent.
 
-**An open plugin set (loading user plugins from disk).** This round ships a closed set; the PoC incidentally confirmed that on-disk ESM import outside the VFS works (through the `ctx.baseUrl` relative-path channel). It is listed as a future evolution, which must separately solve sharing the cordis instance inside the exe with external plugins.
+**An open plugin set (loading user plugins from disk).** The shipped set is closed; the PoC incidentally confirmed that on-disk ESM import outside the VFS works (through the `ctx.baseUrl` relative-path channel). It is listed as a future evolution, which must separately solve sharing the cordis instance inside the exe with external plugins.
 
 ## Consequences
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-10-single-file-executable-sdk-runtime-distribution.zh.md

@@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ exe 使用 [@yao-pkg/pkg](https://github.com/yao-pkg/pkg)（vercel/pkg 归档后
 
 确定性协议实现（`server.ts` / `transport.ts`）按 `acp/acp` + `examples/acp-demo` 的既有模式落为两包——对外服务接口本身也是插件：
 
-- [`packages/ui/jsonrpc`](../../../../packages/ui/jsonrpc/README.md)（`@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc`）：纯协议插件；执行 `apply` 时，在进程 stdio 上挂载 `HarnessSdkServer` 与按行传输的 JSON-RPC 层，资源释放走 `ctx.effect()`。是否提供服务由 `cordis.yml` 决定；未挂载该插件的配置会启动一个不提供此服务的合法进程。协议级退出归插件所有（应答并刷新 `shutdown` 响应后 dispose 根运行时以排空持久化，再调用 `exit(0)`；HMR 式卸载只停止服务，不退出进程）。
-- [`packages/examples/jsonrpc-demo`](../../../../packages/examples/jsonrpc-demo/README.md)（`@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc-demo`）：轻量应用入口——`installFailLoud` + `loadEnv` + 配置发现 + [`dsh-app-boot`](../../../../packages/ui/app-boot/src/index.ts) 的 `boot()`；`boot()` 完成后入口即完成，服务器由 `cordis.yml` 中的 `dsh-jsonrpc` 条目启动。它只依赖 `app-boot`。进程级退出归 `bin` 所有（stdin EOF/SIGTERM → dispose 后返回 0，SIGINT → 130）。
+- [`packages/scaffold/server`](../../../../packages/scaffold/server/README.md)（`@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc`）：纯协议插件；执行 `apply` 时，在进程 stdio 上挂载 `HarnessSdkServer` 与按行传输的 JSON-RPC 层，资源释放走 `ctx.effect()`。是否提供服务由 `cordis.yml` 决定；未挂载该插件的配置会启动一个不提供此服务的合法进程。协议级退出归插件所有（应答并确保 `shutdown` 响应发送完毕后，对根运行时执行 dispose（资源释放），让待处理的持久化操作完成，再调用 `exit(0)`；HMR 式卸载只停止服务，不退出进程）。
+- [`packages/examples/jsonrpc-demo`](../../../../packages/examples/jsonrpc-demo/README.md)（`@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc-demo`）：轻量应用入口——`installFailLoud` + `loadEnv` + 配置发现 + [`dsh-app-boot`](../../../../packages/boot/app-boot/src/index.ts) 的 `boot()`；`boot()` 完成后入口即完成，服务器由 `cordis.yml` 中的 `dsh-jsonrpc` 条目启动。它只依赖 `app-boot`。进程级退出归 `bin` 所有（stdin EOF/SIGTERM → dispose 后返回 0，SIGINT → 130）。
 
 配置发现有两个通道，均缺失时立即报错：优先使用 `DSH_CORDIS_CONFIG` 环境变量（SDK 客户端约定），其次使用 argv 位置参数；没有默认路径或内置回退——「实际启动的插件由外部 `cordis.yml` 决定」是硬语义。
 
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ exe 内支持 `dsh-workflow-workerthread` 与 `dsh-code-runtime-worker`。两个
 
 **让 jsonrpc-agent 承担完整闭包依赖。** 应用入口将声明 53 个以上自身并不 `import()` 的依赖，使「打包 manifest」伪装成真实依赖关系，还会迫使 `constraints` 为其增加 `cordis-in-dependencies` 与 `files` 通配符两个例外。将闭包清单放在 Python 侧的 manifest 包后，`constraints` 不需要任何例外，`bin` 也能保持与 acp-agent 同构的正常包形状。
 
-**开放插件集（从磁盘加载用户插件）。** 本期采用封闭集；PoC 同时证实，可以通过 `ctx.baseUrl` 相对路径通道从 VFS 外的磁盘 `import()` ESM。该能力列为后续演进，届时还需解决外部插件与 exe 内 Cordis 实例的共享问题。
+**开放插件集（从磁盘加载用户插件）。** 交付的集合是封闭的；PoC 同时证实，可以通过 `ctx.baseUrl` 相对路径通道从 VFS 外的磁盘 `import()` ESM。该能力列为后续演进，届时还需解决外部插件与 exe 内 Cordis 实例的共享问题。
 
 ## 后果