|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,437 @@
|
|
|
+/**
|
|
|
+ * Cross-process write-lock behavior, exercised through fresh backend
|
|
|
+ * instances over one shared root: kernel `flock` locks conflict between two
|
|
|
+ * descriptors even inside one process, so a second instance behaves exactly
|
|
|
+ * like a second process. Exclusion while a holder is live, immediate
|
|
|
+ * admission after close, lock-file residue rules, and the inode verification
|
|
|
+ * that defeats an unlinked-and-recreated lock path. Filesystem and flock
|
|
|
+ * refusals are injected through the module mocks below: POSIX modes cannot
|
|
|
+ * express them on Windows, and an injected error is the only deterministic
|
|
|
+ * cross-platform refusal. Real cross-process exclusion and crash release are
|
|
|
+ * pinned by lease.two-process.e2e.ts.
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+import { existsSync } from 'node:fs'
|
|
|
+import { mkdtemp, readdir, readFile, rm, writeFile } from 'node:fs/promises'
|
|
|
+import { tmpdir } from 'node:os'
|
|
|
+import { join } from 'node:path'
|
|
|
+import { afterEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest'
|
|
|
+import { Context } from '@deepseek-ai/cordis'
|
|
|
+import { SESSION_FORMAT_VERSION, SessionId, SessionSeq } from '@deepseek-ai/dsh-session'
|
|
|
+import type { SessionHeader } from '@deepseek-ai/dsh-session'
|
|
|
+import {
|
|
|
+ SessionAlreadyExistsError,
|
|
|
+ SessionAlreadyOwnedError,
|
|
|
+ SessionPersistenceNotFoundError,
|
|
|
+} from '@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-persistence'
|
|
|
+import type { SessionPersistence } from '@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-persistence'
|
|
|
+import JsonlSessionPersistence from '../src/index.ts'
|
|
|
+import { LEASE_FILENAME, SessionWriteLease } from '../src/lease.ts'
|
|
|
+import type { JsonlSessionHandle } from '../src/storage.ts'
|
|
|
+import { sessionDir } from '../src/format.ts'
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+// The lock's base name, duplicated for the hoisted mock factories: they run
|
|
|
+// while `../src/lease.ts` is still evaluating, before LEASE_FILENAME exists.
|
|
|
+const LOCK = vi.hoisted(() => 'session.lock')
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+const refuse = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
|
+ /** Next open of a lock file fails EACCES (read-only directory). */
|
|
|
+ lockOpen: false,
|
|
|
+ /** Next flock call fails EACCES (a non-contention kernel refusal). */
|
|
|
+ flock: false,
|
|
|
+ /** Next flock call fails EWOULDBLOCK (the Windows LockFileEx contention code). */
|
|
|
+ flockBusy: false,
|
|
|
+ /** Next stat of a lock file fails EACCES (unreadable path). */
|
|
|
+ lockStat: false,
|
|
|
+ /** For N further lock-path stats: unlink and recreate the file first, so the locked inode is orphaned. */
|
|
|
+ swapLockOnStat: 0,
|
|
|
+ /** Next lock-path stat: unlink the file first, so the verify read finds nothing. */
|
|
|
+ dropLockOnStat: false,
|
|
|
+}))
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+vi.mock('node:fs/promises', async (importOriginal) => {
|
|
|
+ const actual = await importOriginal<typeof import('node:fs/promises')>()
|
|
|
+ const denied = (syscall: string): never => {
|
|
|
+ throw Object.assign(new Error(`EACCES: injected ${syscall} refusal`), { code: 'EACCES' })
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+ return {
|
|
|
+ ...actual,
|
|
|
+ open: (async (path: unknown, ...rest: never[]) => {
|
|
|
+ if (refuse.lockOpen && String(path).endsWith(LOCK)) {
|
|
|
+ refuse.lockOpen = false
|
|
|
+ denied('open')
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+ return (actual.open as (path: unknown, ...args: never[]) => Promise<unknown>)(path, ...rest)
|
|
|
+ }) as typeof actual.open,
|
|
|
+ stat: (async (path: unknown, ...rest: never[]) => {
|
|
|
+ const at = String(path)
|
|
|
+ if (at.endsWith(LOCK)) {
|
|
|
+ if (refuse.lockStat) {
|
|
|
+ refuse.lockStat = false
|
|
|
+ denied('stat')
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+ if (refuse.dropLockOnStat) {
|
|
|
+ refuse.dropLockOnStat = false
|
|
|
+ await actual.unlink(at)
|
|
|
+ } else if (refuse.swapLockOnStat > 0) {
|
|
|
+ refuse.swapLockOnStat -= 1
|
|
|
+ await actual.unlink(at)
|
|
|
+ await actual.writeFile(at, '')
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+ return (actual.stat as (path: unknown, ...args: never[]) => Promise<unknown>)(path, ...rest)
|
|
|
+ }) as typeof actual.stat,
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+})
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+vi.mock('fs-ext', async (importOriginal) => {
|
|
|
+ const actual = await importOriginal<typeof import('fs-ext')>()
|
|
|
+ return {
|
|
|
+ ...actual,
|
|
|
+ flock: ((fd: number, flags: never, callback: (error: Error | null) => void) => {
|
|
|
+ if (refuse.flock) {
|
|
|
+ refuse.flock = false
|
|
|
+ callback(Object.assign(new Error('EACCES: injected flock refusal'), { code: 'EACCES' }))
|
|
|
+ return
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+ if (refuse.flockBusy) {
|
|
|
+ refuse.flockBusy = false
|
|
|
+ callback(Object.assign(new Error('EWOULDBLOCK: injected contention'), { code: 'EWOULDBLOCK' }))
|
|
|
+ return
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+ (actual.flock as (fd: number, flags: never, callback: (error: Error | null) => void) => void)(fd, flags, callback)
|
|
|
+ }) as typeof actual.flock,
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+})
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+const dirs: string[] = []
|
|
|
+const contexts: Context[] = []
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+afterEach(async () => {
|
|
|
+ refuse.lockOpen = false
|
|
|
+ refuse.flock = false
|
|
|
+ refuse.flockBusy = false
|
|
|
+ refuse.lockStat = false
|
|
|
+ refuse.swapLockOnStat = 0
|
|
|
+ refuse.dropLockOnStat = false
|
|
|
+ for (const ctx of contexts.splice(0)) await ctx.fiber.dispose()
|
|
|
+ for (const dir of dirs.splice(0)) await rm(dir, { recursive: true, force: true })
|
|
|
+})
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+function meta(id: string, cwd = '/work'): SessionHeader {
|
|
|
+ return { version: SESSION_FORMAT_VERSION, id: SessionId(id), createdAt: 1_000, cwd, isSeeded: false }
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+async function freshRoot(): Promise<string> {
|
|
|
+ const root = await mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), 'dsh-jsonl-lease-'))
|
|
|
+ dirs.push(root)
|
|
|
+ return root
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+async function mount(root: string): Promise<SessionPersistence> {
|
|
|
+ const ctx = new Context()
|
|
|
+ contexts.push(ctx)
|
|
|
+ await ctx.plugin(JsonlSessionPersistence, { root, compression: 'none' })
|
|
|
+ return ctx.sessionPersistence
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+function lockPath(root: string, id: string, cwd = '/work'): string {
|
|
|
+ return join(sessionDir(root, cwd, SessionId(id)), LEASE_FILENAME)
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+/**
|
|
|
+ * Make the next lock release do its real work, then report failure — as a
|
|
|
+ * close(2) that freed the descriptor but returned EIO would.
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
+function failReleaseOnce(): void {
|
|
|
+ const spy = vi.spyOn(SessionWriteLease.prototype, 'release')
|
|
|
+ spy.mockImplementationOnce(async function (this: SessionWriteLease) {
|
|
|
+ spy.mockRestore()
|
|
|
+ await this.release()
|
|
|
+ throw Object.assign(new Error('EIO: injected release failure'), { code: 'EIO' })
|
|
|
+ })
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+const EVENTS = [
|
|
|
+ { type: 'turn/start', seq: SessionSeq(0), time: 1, data: { turn: 1 } },
|
|
|
+ { type: 'turn/end', seq: SessionSeq(1), time: 2, data: { turn: 1, reason: { kind: 'completed' } } },
|
|
|
+] as const
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+describe('cross-process write lock', () => {
|
|
|
+ it('excludes a second instance while the holder is live, and admits it after close', async () => {
|
|
|
+ const root = await freshRoot()
|
|
|
+ const first = await mount(root)
|
|
|
+ const second = await mount(root)
|
|
|
+ const holder = await first.create(meta('excluded'))
|
|
|
+ await holder.append([...EVENTS])
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Another instance over the same root cannot create or write-open the id:
|
|
|
+ // the materialized duplicate is an existence fact, the write open an
|
|
|
+ // ownership one.
|
|
|
+ await expect(second.create(meta('excluded'))).rejects.toBeInstanceOf(SessionAlreadyExistsError)
|
|
|
+ await expect(second.open(SessionId('excluded'), 'write')).rejects.toBeInstanceOf(SessionAlreadyOwnedError)
|
|
|
+ // Unmaterialized creates hold no lock and leave no artifact, so a rival
|
|
|
+ // instance's create succeeds; the collision surfaces at the loser's first
|
|
|
+ // materializing write, where the winner already holds the lock.
|
|
|
+ const pendingWinner = await first.create(meta('excluded-pending'))
|
|
|
+ const pendingLoser = await second.create(meta('excluded-pending'))
|
|
|
+ await pendingWinner.append([...EVENTS])
|
|
|
+ await expect(pendingLoser.append([...EVENTS])).rejects.toBeInstanceOf(SessionAlreadyOwnedError)
|
|
|
+ await pendingLoser.close()
|
|
|
+ await pendingWinner.close()
|
|
|
+ // Reads never touch the lock.
|
|
|
+ const reader = await second.open(SessionId('excluded'), 'read')
|
|
|
+ expect((await reader.read()).map(event => event.seq)).toEqual([0, 1])
|
|
|
+ await reader.close()
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ await holder.close()
|
|
|
+ // POSIX keeps the materialized session's lock file (Windows locks a kernel
|
|
|
+ // object with no filesystem footprint); the kernel lock itself is gone.
|
|
|
+ if (process.platform !== 'win32') expect(existsSync(lockPath(root, 'excluded'))).toBe(true)
|
|
|
+ const reopened = await second.open(SessionId('excluded'), 'write')
|
|
|
+ await reopened.append([{ type: 'turn/start', seq: SessionSeq(2), time: 3, data: { turn: 2 } }])
|
|
|
+ await reopened.close()
|
|
|
+ })
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ it.skipIf(process.platform === 'win32')('removing the lock file forfeits a wedged holder: a fresh inode admits a successor', async () => {
|
|
|
+ const root = await freshRoot()
|
|
|
+ const first = await mount(root)
|
|
|
+ const second = await mount(root)
|
|
|
+ const wedged = await first.create(meta('wedged'))
|
|
|
+ await wedged.append([...EVENTS])
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // The documented escape hatch for a live-but-stuck holder: deleting the
|
|
|
+ // lock file orphans the held inode, and a successor locks the fresh one.
|
|
|
+ await rm(lockPath(root, 'wedged'))
|
|
|
+ const successor = await second.open(SessionId('wedged'), 'write')
|
|
|
+ await successor.append([{ type: 'turn/start', seq: SessionSeq(2), time: 3, data: { turn: 2 } }])
|
|
|
+ await successor.close()
|
|
|
+ await wedged.close()
|
|
|
+ })
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ it('write-opening an absent session leaves no lock residue', async () => {
|
|
|
+ const root = await freshRoot()
|
|
|
+ const backend = await mount(root)
|
|
|
+ await expect(backend.open(SessionId('absent'), 'write')).rejects.toBeInstanceOf(SessionPersistenceNotFoundError)
|
|
|
+ expect(existsSync(join(root, LEASE_FILENAME))).toBe(false)
|
|
|
+ })
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ it('write-opening an absent id under an existing project directory reports not-found', async () => {
|
|
|
+ const root = await freshRoot()
|
|
|
+ const backend = await mount(root)
|
|
|
+ const writer = await backend.create(meta('present-sibling'))
|
|
|
+ await writer.append([...EVENTS])
|
|
|
+ await writer.close()
|
|
|
+ // The project directory exists but the id's session directory does not:
|
|
|
+ // the generation scan reports absence rather than misreading a sibling.
|
|
|
+ await expect(backend.open(SessionId('absent-sibling'), 'write')).rejects.toBeInstanceOf(SessionPersistenceNotFoundError)
|
|
|
+ })
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ it('a never-materialized create leaves no filesystem footprint at all', async () => {
|
|
|
+ const root = await freshRoot()
|
|
|
+ const backend = await mount(root)
|
|
|
+ const handle = await backend.create(meta('erased'))
|
|
|
+ // The lock is taken only at the first materializing write, so an
|
|
|
+ // unmaterialized session creates neither its directory nor a lock file.
|
|
|
+ expect(existsSync(join(lockPath(root, 'erased'), '..'))).toBe(false)
|
|
|
+ await handle.close()
|
|
|
+ expect(existsSync(join(lockPath(root, 'erased'), '..'))).toBe(false)
|
|
|
+ await expect(backend.stat(SessionId('erased'))).resolves.toBeUndefined()
|
|
|
+ })
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ it('materialization publishes the lock before the first log bytes and keeps it on the handle', async () => {
|
|
|
+ const root = await freshRoot()
|
|
|
+ const first = await mount(root)
|
|
|
+ const second = await mount(root)
|
|
|
+ const creator = await first.create(meta('lazy-lock'))
|
|
|
+ await creator.append([...EVENTS])
|
|
|
+ // The materializing append acquired and retained the lock.
|
|
|
+ if (process.platform !== 'win32') expect(existsSync(lockPath(root, 'lazy-lock'))).toBe(true)
|
|
|
+ await expect(second.open(SessionId('lazy-lock'), 'write')).rejects.toBeInstanceOf(SessionAlreadyOwnedError)
|
|
|
+ // A later append reuses the held lock rather than re-acquiring.
|
|
|
+ await creator.append([{ type: 'turn/start', seq: SessionSeq(2), time: 3, data: { turn: 2 } }])
|
|
|
+ await creator.close()
|
|
|
+ const reopened = await second.open(SessionId('lazy-lock'), 'write')
|
|
|
+ await reopened.close()
|
|
|
+ })
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ it('an explicitly flushed empty session takes the lock with its header', async () => {
|
|
|
+ const root = await freshRoot()
|
|
|
+ const first = await mount(root)
|
|
|
+ const second = await mount(root)
|
|
|
+ const creator = await first.create(meta('flush-lock'))
|
|
|
+ await creator.flush()
|
|
|
+ await expect(second.open(SessionId('flush-lock'), 'write')).rejects.toBeInstanceOf(SessionAlreadyOwnedError)
|
|
|
+ await creator.close()
|
|
|
+ })
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ it.skipIf(process.platform === 'win32')('surfaces a filesystem refusal opening the lock file', async () => {
|
|
|
+ const root = await freshRoot()
|
|
|
+ const backend = await mount(root)
|
|
|
+ const writer = await backend.create(meta('open-blocked'))
|
|
|
+ await writer.append([...EVENTS])
|
|
|
+ await writer.close()
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ refuse.lockOpen = true
|
|
|
+ await expect(backend.open(SessionId('open-blocked'), 'write')).rejects.toThrow(/EACCES/)
|
|
|
+ })
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ it.skipIf(process.platform === 'win32')('surfaces a non-contention flock failure', async () => {
|
|
|
+ const root = await freshRoot()
|
|
|
+ const backend = await mount(root)
|
|
|
+ const writer = await backend.create(meta('flock-blocked'))
|
|
|
+ await writer.append([...EVENTS])
|
|
|
+ await writer.close()
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ refuse.flock = true
|
|
|
+ await expect(backend.open(SessionId('flock-blocked'), 'write')).rejects.toThrow(/EACCES/)
|
|
|
+ })
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ it.skipIf(process.platform === 'win32')('maps the EWOULDBLOCK contention spelling to already-owned', async () => {
|
|
|
+ const root = await freshRoot()
|
|
|
+ const backend = await mount(root)
|
|
|
+ const writer = await backend.create(meta('win-contended'))
|
|
|
+ await writer.append([...EVENTS])
|
|
|
+ await writer.close()
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Some libcs spell flock(2) contention EWOULDBLOCK rather than EAGAIN.
|
|
|
+ refuse.flockBusy = true
|
|
|
+ await expect(backend.open(SessionId('win-contended'), 'write')).rejects.toBeInstanceOf(SessionAlreadyOwnedError)
|
|
|
+ })
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ it.skipIf(process.platform === 'win32')('surfaces a lock-path stat refusal from the inode verification', async () => {
|
|
|
+ const root = await freshRoot()
|
|
|
+ const backend = await mount(root)
|
|
|
+ const writer = await backend.create(meta('stat-blocked'))
|
|
|
+ await writer.append([...EVENTS])
|
|
|
+ await writer.close()
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ refuse.lockStat = true
|
|
|
+ await expect(backend.open(SessionId('stat-blocked'), 'write')).rejects.toThrow(/EACCES/)
|
|
|
+ })
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ it.skipIf(process.platform === 'win32')('retries when the locked inode is no longer the lock path, and wins on a stable pass', async () => {
|
|
|
+ const root = await freshRoot()
|
|
|
+ const backend = await mount(root)
|
|
|
+ const writer = await backend.create(meta('churned'))
|
|
|
+ await writer.append([...EVENTS])
|
|
|
+ await writer.close()
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // One churn (unlink+recreate under the verify stat) orphans the first
|
|
|
+ // locked inode; the retry locks the fresh file and verifies clean.
|
|
|
+ refuse.swapLockOnStat = 1
|
|
|
+ const reopened = await backend.open(SessionId('churned'), 'write')
|
|
|
+ await reopened.append([{ type: 'turn/start', seq: SessionSeq(2), time: 3, data: { turn: 2 } }])
|
|
|
+ await reopened.close()
|
|
|
+ })
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ it.skipIf(process.platform === 'win32')('retries when the lock path vanishes under the verify read', async () => {
|
|
|
+ const root = await freshRoot()
|
|
|
+ const backend = await mount(root)
|
|
|
+ const writer = await backend.create(meta('vanished'))
|
|
|
+ await writer.append([...EVENTS])
|
|
|
+ await writer.close()
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ refuse.dropLockOnStat = true
|
|
|
+ const reopened = await backend.open(SessionId('vanished'), 'write')
|
|
|
+ await reopened.close()
|
|
|
+ })
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ it.skipIf(process.platform === 'win32')('gives up as already-owned when the lock path never stabilizes', async () => {
|
|
|
+ const root = await freshRoot()
|
|
|
+ const backend = await mount(root)
|
|
|
+ const writer = await backend.create(meta('unstable'))
|
|
|
+ await writer.append([...EVENTS])
|
|
|
+ await writer.close()
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Churn on every attempt: the bounded retry refuses rather than spinning.
|
|
|
+ refuse.swapLockOnStat = 3
|
|
|
+ await expect(backend.open(SessionId('unstable'), 'write')).rejects.toBeInstanceOf(SessionAlreadyOwnedError)
|
|
|
+ })
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ it('a failing lock release still frees the in-process claim on close', async () => {
|
|
|
+ const root = await freshRoot()
|
|
|
+ const backend = await mount(root)
|
|
|
+ const holder = await backend.create(meta('release-fails'))
|
|
|
+ await holder.append([...EVENTS])
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ failReleaseOnce()
|
|
|
+ await expect(holder.close()).rejects.toThrow(/injected release failure/)
|
|
|
+ // The claim is freed despite the failed release: the id is not wedged.
|
|
|
+ const reopened = await backend.open(SessionId('release-fails'), 'write')
|
|
|
+ await reopened.append([{ type: 'turn/start', seq: SessionSeq(2), time: 3, data: { turn: 2 } }])
|
|
|
+ await reopened.close()
|
|
|
+ })
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ it('a write-open failure with a failing release aggregates both and frees the claim', async () => {
|
|
|
+ const root = await freshRoot()
|
|
|
+ const backend = await mount(root)
|
|
|
+ const writer = await backend.create(meta('open-and-release-fail'))
|
|
|
+ await writer.append([...EVENTS])
|
|
|
+ await writer.close()
|
|
|
+ // Corrupt the stored header line so the open fails after the lock is
|
|
|
+ // acquired (a garbled tail would be recovered as torn, not refused).
|
|
|
+ const dir = join(lockPath(root, 'open-and-release-fail'), '..')
|
|
|
+ const log = (await readdir(dir)).find(name => name.endsWith('.jsonl'))
|
|
|
+ const stored = await readFile(join(dir, String(log)), 'utf8')
|
|
|
+ await writeFile(join(dir, String(log)), `#${stored.slice(1)}`)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ failReleaseOnce()
|
|
|
+ const outcome = await backend.open(SessionId('open-and-release-fail'), 'write').then(() => undefined, (error: unknown) => error)
|
|
|
+ expect(outcome).toBeInstanceOf(AggregateError)
|
|
|
+ const errors = (outcome as AggregateError).errors as Error[]
|
|
|
+ expect(errors).toHaveLength(2)
|
|
|
+ expect(String(errors[0])).toMatch(/corrupt/i)
|
|
|
+ expect(String(errors[1])).toMatch(/injected release failure/)
|
|
|
+ // The original diagnostic survives, and the claim is freed: the next
|
|
|
+ // attempt reports the corruption again rather than a phantom owner.
|
|
|
+ await expect(backend.open(SessionId('open-and-release-fail'), 'write')).rejects.toThrow(/corrupt/i)
|
|
|
+ })
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ it('a drain failure and a release failure reject close as one AggregateError', async () => {
|
|
|
+ const root = await freshRoot()
|
|
|
+ const backend = await mount(root)
|
|
|
+ const holder = await backend.create(meta('drain-and-release-fail')) as unknown as JsonlSessionHandle
|
|
|
+ await holder.append([...EVENTS])
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ vi.spyOn(backend as unknown as { persistBatch: () => Promise<void> }, 'persistBatch')
|
|
|
+ .mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error('injected drain refusal'))
|
|
|
+ holder.enqueueLive({ type: 'turn/start', seq: SessionSeq(2), time: 3, data: { turn: 2 } }, () => {})
|
|
|
+ failReleaseOnce()
|
|
|
+ const outcome = await holder.close().then(() => undefined, (error: unknown) => error)
|
|
|
+ expect(outcome).toBeInstanceOf(AggregateError)
|
|
|
+ expect((outcome as AggregateError).errors.map(String).join('\n')).toMatch(/drain refusal[\s\S]*release failure/)
|
|
|
+ // Both failures reported, and the id is still not wedged.
|
|
|
+ const reopened = await backend.open(SessionId('drain-and-release-fail'), 'write')
|
|
|
+ await reopened.close()
|
|
|
+ })
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ it.skipIf(process.platform === 'win32')('release is idempotent and never removes the lock file', async () => {
|
|
|
+ const root = await freshRoot()
|
|
|
+ const dir = join(root, 'solo')
|
|
|
+ const lease = await SessionWriteLease.acquire(dir, SessionId('solo'))
|
|
|
+ await lease.release()
|
|
|
+ await lease.release()
|
|
|
+ // The file survives every release, keeping the stable inode later
|
|
|
+ // lockers verify against; the kernel lock died with the descriptor.
|
|
|
+ expect(existsSync(join(dir, LOCK))).toBe(true)
|
|
|
+ const successor = await SessionWriteLease.acquire(dir, SessionId('solo'))
|
|
|
+ await successor.release()
|
|
|
+ expect(existsSync(join(dir, LOCK))).toBe(true)
|
|
|
+ })
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ it('keeps distinct sessions independently lockable', async () => {
|
|
|
+ const root = await freshRoot()
|
|
|
+ const backend = await mount(root)
|
|
|
+ const a = await backend.create(meta('indep-a'))
|
|
|
+ const b = await backend.create(meta('indep-b'))
|
|
|
+ await a.append([...EVENTS])
|
|
|
+ await b.append([...EVENTS])
|
|
|
+ if (process.platform !== 'win32') {
|
|
|
+ expect((await readdir(join(lockPath(root, 'indep-a'), '..'))).filter(name => name === LOCK)).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+ await a.close()
|
|
|
+ await b.close()
|
|
|
+ })
|
|
|
+})
|
creatixchu