|
|
@@ -12,72 +12,23 @@ If you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing
|
|
|
|
|
|
IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.
|
|
|
+This is not negotiable. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.
|
|
|
</EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>
|
|
|
|
|
|
-## Instruction Priority
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-Superpowers skills override default system prompt behavior, but **user instructions always take precedence**:
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-1. **User's explicit instructions** (CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, AGENTS.md, direct requests) — highest priority
|
|
|
-2. **Superpowers skills** — override default system behavior where they conflict
|
|
|
-3. **Default system prompt** — lowest priority
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-If CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, or AGENTS.md says "don't use TDD" and a skill says "always use TDD," follow the user's instructions. The user is in control.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-## How to Access Skills
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-**Never read skill files manually with file tools** — always use your platform's skill-loading mechanism so the skill is properly activated.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-**In Claude Code:** Use the `Skill` tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you — follow it directly.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-**In Codex:** Skills load natively. Follow the instructions presented when a skill activates.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-**In Copilot CLI:** Use the `skill` tool. Skills are auto-discovered from installed plugins.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-**In Gemini CLI:** Skills activate via the `activate_skill` tool. Gemini loads skill metadata at session start and activates the full content on demand.
|
|
|
+## The Rule
|
|
|
|
|
|
-**In other environments:** Check your platform's documentation for how skills are loaded.
|
|
|
+**Invoke relevant or requested skills BEFORE any response or action** — including clarifying questions, exploring the codebase, or checking files. Even a 1% chance a skill applies means you invoke it to check. If it turns out wrong for the situation, you don't have to use it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-## Platform Adaptation
|
|
|
+**Before entering plan mode:** if you haven't already brainstormed, invoke the brainstorming skill first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Skills speak in actions ("dispatch a subagent", "create a todo", "read a file") rather than naming any one runtime's tools. For per-platform tool equivalents and instructions-file conventions, see [claude-code-tools.md](references/claude-code-tools.md), [codex-tools.md](references/codex-tools.md), [copilot-tools.md](references/copilot-tools.md), [gemini-tools.md](references/gemini-tools.md), [pi-tools.md](references/pi-tools.md), and [antigravity-tools.md](references/antigravity-tools.md). Gemini CLI users get the tool mapping loaded automatically via GEMINI.md.
|
|
|
+Then announce "Using [skill] to [purpose]" and follow the skill exactly. If it has a checklist, create a todo per item.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-# Using Skills
|
|
|
+## Skill Priority
|
|
|
|
|
|
-## The Rule
|
|
|
+When multiple skills apply, process skills come first — they set the approach, then implementation skills (frontend-design, etc.) carry it out. Brainstorming and systematic-debugging are the most common process skills, but the rule holds for any of them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-**Invoke relevant or requested skills BEFORE any response or action.** Even a 1% chance a skill might apply means that you should invoke the skill to check. If an invoked skill turns out to be wrong for the situation, you don't need to use it.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-```dot
|
|
|
-digraph skill_flow {
|
|
|
- "User message received" [shape=doublecircle];
|
|
|
- "About to enter plan mode?" [shape=doublecircle];
|
|
|
- "Already brainstormed?" [shape=diamond];
|
|
|
- "Invoke brainstorming skill" [shape=box];
|
|
|
- "Might any skill apply?" [shape=diamond];
|
|
|
- "Invoke the skill" [shape=box];
|
|
|
- "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" [shape=box];
|
|
|
- "Has checklist?" [shape=diamond];
|
|
|
- "Create a todo per item" [shape=box];
|
|
|
- "Follow skill exactly" [shape=box];
|
|
|
- "Respond (including clarifications)" [shape=doublecircle];
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- "About to enter plan mode?" -> "Already brainstormed?";
|
|
|
- "Already brainstormed?" -> "Invoke brainstorming skill" [label="no"];
|
|
|
- "Already brainstormed?" -> "Might any skill apply?" [label="yes"];
|
|
|
- "Invoke brainstorming skill" -> "Might any skill apply?";
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- "User message received" -> "Might any skill apply?";
|
|
|
- "Might any skill apply?" -> "Invoke the skill" [label="yes, even 1%"];
|
|
|
- "Might any skill apply?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="definitely not"];
|
|
|
- "Invoke the skill" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
|
|
|
- "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" -> "Has checklist?";
|
|
|
- "Has checklist?" -> "Create a todo per item" [label="yes"];
|
|
|
- "Has checklist?" -> "Follow skill exactly" [label="no"];
|
|
|
- "Create a todo per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
|
|
|
-}
|
|
|
-```
|
|
|
+- "Let's build X" → brainstorming first, then implementation skills.
|
|
|
+- "Fix this bug" → systematic-debugging first, then domain skills.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Red Flags
|
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -98,24 +49,17 @@ These thoughts mean STOP—you're rationalizing:
|
|
|
| "This feels productive" | Undisciplined action wastes time. Skills prevent this. |
|
|
|
| "I know what that means" | Knowing the concept ≠ using the skill. Invoke it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-## Skill Priority
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-When multiple skills could apply, use this order:
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-1. **Process skills first** (brainstorming, systematic-debugging) - these determine HOW to approach the task
|
|
|
-2. **Implementation skills second** (frontend-design, mcp-builder) - these guide execution
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-"Let's build X" → brainstorming first, then implementation skills.
|
|
|
-"Fix this bug" → systematic-debugging first, then domain-specific skills.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-## Skill Types
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-**Rigid** (TDD, systematic-debugging): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.
|
|
|
+## Platform Adaptation
|
|
|
|
|
|
-**Flexible** (patterns): Adapt principles to context.
|
|
|
+Skills name actions ("dispatch a subagent", "create a todo", "read a file"), not any one runtime's tools. For your harness's tool equivalents and instructions-file conventions, read the matching file:
|
|
|
|
|
|
-The skill itself tells you which.
|
|
|
+- Claude Code: `references/claude-code-tools.md`
|
|
|
+- Codex: `references/codex-tools.md`
|
|
|
+- Copilot CLI: `references/copilot-tools.md`
|
|
|
+- Gemini CLI: `references/gemini-tools.md` (also auto-loaded via GEMINI.md)
|
|
|
+- Pi: `references/pi-tools.md`
|
|
|
+- Antigravity: `references/antigravity-tools.md`
|
|
|
|
|
|
## User Instructions
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Instructions say WHAT, not HOW. "Add X" or "Fix Y" doesn't mean skip workflows.
|
|
|
+User instructions (CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, AGENTS.md, direct requests) take precedence over skills, which in turn override default system behavior. But they set WHAT to do, not HOW — "Add X" or "Fix Y" is not permission to skip the workflow a skill prescribes.
|