Selaa lähdekoodia

WIP snapshot: compress using-superpowers bootstrap (~1698 → ~993 tokens)

Condense the injected bootstrap without dropping behavior-shaping content:
replace the graphviz flowchart with prose (1% rule, plan-mode->brainstorm gate,
announce + checklist->todos), fold Instruction-Priority into User Instructions,
and drop the per-platform skill-loading section. Keep the full Red Flags
rationalization table (all 12), the platform tool-mapping pointer (now a
skill-relative path list), skill priority framed as a category (process before
implementation, not just the two named skills), and user-instruction precedence
plus the WHAT/HOW guard.

Snapshot on a local branch for review — NOT final, NOT for dev. Open items:
the dropped "Skill Types" (rigid/flexible) section, and evals for user
preferences overriding skills. Clean Docker evals show the more-aggressive
g-minimal preserves load-bearing triggering across opus/sonnet/haiku/codex/
gemini/kimi; this variant keeps more content.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Hz32pBE7kiqr78DY6PWmZN
Jesse Vincent 3 kuukautta sitten
vanhempi
sitoutus
274cf1617b
1 muutettua tiedostoa jossa 18 lisäystä ja 74 poistoa
  1. 18 74
      skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md

+ 18 - 74
skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md

@@ -12,72 +12,23 @@ If you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing
 
 IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.
 
-This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.
+This is not negotiable. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.
 </EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>
 
-## Instruction Priority
-
-Superpowers skills override default system prompt behavior, but **user instructions always take precedence**:
-
-1. **User's explicit instructions** (CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, AGENTS.md, direct requests) — highest priority
-2. **Superpowers skills** — override default system behavior where they conflict
-3. **Default system prompt** — lowest priority
-
-If CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, or AGENTS.md says "don't use TDD" and a skill says "always use TDD," follow the user's instructions. The user is in control.
-
-## How to Access Skills
-
-**Never read skill files manually with file tools** — always use your platform's skill-loading mechanism so the skill is properly activated.
-
-**In Claude Code:** Use the `Skill` tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you — follow it directly.
-
-**In Codex:** Skills load natively. Follow the instructions presented when a skill activates.
-
-**In Copilot CLI:** Use the `skill` tool. Skills are auto-discovered from installed plugins.
-
-**In Gemini CLI:** Skills activate via the `activate_skill` tool. Gemini loads skill metadata at session start and activates the full content on demand.
+## The Rule
 
-**In other environments:** Check your platform's documentation for how skills are loaded.
+**Invoke relevant or requested skills BEFORE any response or action** — including clarifying questions, exploring the codebase, or checking files. Even a 1% chance a skill applies means you invoke it to check. If it turns out wrong for the situation, you don't have to use it.
 
-## Platform Adaptation
+**Before entering plan mode:** if you haven't already brainstormed, invoke the brainstorming skill first.
 
-Skills speak in actions ("dispatch a subagent", "create a todo", "read a file") rather than naming any one runtime's tools. For per-platform tool equivalents and instructions-file conventions, see [claude-code-tools.md](references/claude-code-tools.md), [codex-tools.md](references/codex-tools.md), [copilot-tools.md](references/copilot-tools.md), [gemini-tools.md](references/gemini-tools.md), [pi-tools.md](references/pi-tools.md), and [antigravity-tools.md](references/antigravity-tools.md). Gemini CLI users get the tool mapping loaded automatically via GEMINI.md.
+Then announce "Using [skill] to [purpose]" and follow the skill exactly. If it has a checklist, create a todo per item.
 
-# Using Skills
+## Skill Priority
 
-## The Rule
+When multiple skills apply, process skills come first — they set the approach, then implementation skills (frontend-design, etc.) carry it out. Brainstorming and systematic-debugging are the most common process skills, but the rule holds for any of them.
 
-**Invoke relevant or requested skills BEFORE any response or action.** Even a 1% chance a skill might apply means that you should invoke the skill to check. If an invoked skill turns out to be wrong for the situation, you don't need to use it.
-
-```dot
-digraph skill_flow {
-    "User message received" [shape=doublecircle];
-    "About to enter plan mode?" [shape=doublecircle];
-    "Already brainstormed?" [shape=diamond];
-    "Invoke brainstorming skill" [shape=box];
-    "Might any skill apply?" [shape=diamond];
-    "Invoke the skill" [shape=box];
-    "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" [shape=box];
-    "Has checklist?" [shape=diamond];
-    "Create a todo per item" [shape=box];
-    "Follow skill exactly" [shape=box];
-    "Respond (including clarifications)" [shape=doublecircle];
-
-    "About to enter plan mode?" -> "Already brainstormed?";
-    "Already brainstormed?" -> "Invoke brainstorming skill" [label="no"];
-    "Already brainstormed?" -> "Might any skill apply?" [label="yes"];
-    "Invoke brainstorming skill" -> "Might any skill apply?";
-
-    "User message received" -> "Might any skill apply?";
-    "Might any skill apply?" -> "Invoke the skill" [label="yes, even 1%"];
-    "Might any skill apply?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="definitely not"];
-    "Invoke the skill" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
-    "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" -> "Has checklist?";
-    "Has checklist?" -> "Create a todo per item" [label="yes"];
-    "Has checklist?" -> "Follow skill exactly" [label="no"];
-    "Create a todo per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
-}
-```
+- "Let's build X" → brainstorming first, then implementation skills.
+- "Fix this bug" → systematic-debugging first, then domain skills.
 
 ## Red Flags
 
@@ -98,24 +49,17 @@ These thoughts mean STOP—you're rationalizing:
 | "This feels productive" | Undisciplined action wastes time. Skills prevent this. |
 | "I know what that means" | Knowing the concept ≠ using the skill. Invoke it. |
 
-## Skill Priority
-
-When multiple skills could apply, use this order:
-
-1. **Process skills first** (brainstorming, systematic-debugging) - these determine HOW to approach the task
-2. **Implementation skills second** (frontend-design, mcp-builder) - these guide execution
-
-"Let's build X" → brainstorming first, then implementation skills.
-"Fix this bug" → systematic-debugging first, then domain-specific skills.
-
-## Skill Types
-
-**Rigid** (TDD, systematic-debugging): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.
+## Platform Adaptation
 
-**Flexible** (patterns): Adapt principles to context.
+Skills name actions ("dispatch a subagent", "create a todo", "read a file"), not any one runtime's tools. For your harness's tool equivalents and instructions-file conventions, read the matching file:
 
-The skill itself tells you which.
+- Claude Code: `references/claude-code-tools.md`
+- Codex: `references/codex-tools.md`
+- Copilot CLI: `references/copilot-tools.md`
+- Gemini CLI: `references/gemini-tools.md` (also auto-loaded via GEMINI.md)
+- Pi: `references/pi-tools.md`
+- Antigravity: `references/antigravity-tools.md`
 
 ## User Instructions
 
-Instructions say WHAT, not HOW. "Add X" or "Fix Y" doesn't mean skip workflows.
+User instructions (CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, AGENTS.md, direct requests) take precedence over skills, which in turn override default system behavior. But they set WHAT to do, not HOW — "Add X" or "Fix Y" is not permission to skip the workflow a skill prescribes.