mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-05-20 19:29:56 +08:00
chore: merge origin/main, resolve VERSION + CHANGELOG conflicts
Bump to v0.15.13.0 (above main's 0.15.12.0). Resolve preamble.ts conflicts (keep both vendoring detection and spawned session check). Regenerate all SKILL.md files from resolved sources. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -93,6 +93,8 @@ if [ -d ".claude/skills/gstack" ] && [ ! -L ".claude/skills/gstack" ]; then
|
||||
fi
|
||||
fi
|
||||
echo "VENDORED_GSTACK: $_VENDORED"
|
||||
# Detect spawned session (OpenClaw or other orchestrator)
|
||||
[ -n "$OPENCLAW_SESSION" ] && echo "SPAWNED_SESSION: true" || true
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If `PROACTIVE` is `"false"`, do not proactively suggest gstack skills AND do not
|
||||
@@ -251,6 +253,13 @@ touch ~/.gstack/.vendoring-warned-${SLUG:-unknown}
|
||||
|
||||
This only happens once per project. If the marker file exists, skip entirely.
|
||||
|
||||
If `SPAWNED_SESSION` is `"true"`, you are running inside a session spawned by an
|
||||
AI orchestrator (e.g., OpenClaw). In spawned sessions:
|
||||
- Do NOT use AskUserQuestion for interactive prompts. Auto-choose the recommended option.
|
||||
- Do NOT run upgrade checks, telemetry prompts, routing injection, or lake intro.
|
||||
- Focus on completing the task and reporting results via prose output.
|
||||
- End with a completion report: what shipped, decisions made, anything uncertain.
|
||||
|
||||
## Voice
|
||||
|
||||
You are GStack, an open source AI builder framework shaped by Garry Tan's product, startup, and engineering judgment. Encode how he thinks, not his biography.
|
||||
@@ -932,7 +941,9 @@ STACK=""
|
||||
[ -f go.mod ] && STACK="${STACK}go "
|
||||
[ -f Cargo.toml ] && STACK="${STACK}rust "
|
||||
echo "STACK: ${STACK:-unknown}"
|
||||
DIFF_LINES=$(git diff origin/<base> --stat | tail -1 | grep -oE '[0-9]+ insertion' | grep -oE '[0-9]+' || echo "0")
|
||||
DIFF_INS=$(git diff origin/<base> --stat | tail -1 | grep -oE '[0-9]+ insertion' | grep -oE '[0-9]+' || echo "0")
|
||||
DIFF_DEL=$(git diff origin/<base> --stat | tail -1 | grep -oE '[0-9]+ deletion' | grep -oE '[0-9]+' || echo "0")
|
||||
DIFF_LINES=$((DIFF_INS + DIFF_DEL))
|
||||
echo "DIFF_LINES: $DIFF_LINES"
|
||||
# Detect test framework for specialist test stub generation
|
||||
TEST_FW=""
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -103,39 +103,7 @@ Follow the output format specified in the checklist. Respect the suppressions
|
||||
|
||||
**Every finding gets action — not just critical ones.**
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 5.0: Cross-review finding dedup
|
||||
|
||||
Before classifying findings, check if any were previously skipped by the user in a prior review on this branch.
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-review-read
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Parse the output: only lines BEFORE `---CONFIG---` are JSONL entries (the output also contains `---CONFIG---` and `---HEAD---` footer sections that are not JSONL — ignore those).
|
||||
|
||||
For each JSONL entry that has a `findings` array:
|
||||
1. Collect all fingerprints where `action: "skipped"`
|
||||
2. Note the `commit` field from that entry
|
||||
|
||||
If skipped fingerprints exist, get the list of files changed since that review:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git diff --name-only <prior-review-commit> HEAD
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
For each current finding (from both Step 4 critical pass and Step 4.5-4.6 specialists), check:
|
||||
- Does its fingerprint match a previously skipped finding?
|
||||
- Is the finding's file path NOT in the changed-files set?
|
||||
|
||||
If both conditions are true: suppress the finding. It was intentionally skipped and the relevant code hasn't changed.
|
||||
|
||||
Print: "Suppressed N findings from prior reviews (previously skipped by user)"
|
||||
|
||||
**Only suppress `skipped` findings — never `fixed` or `auto-fixed`** (those might regress and should be re-checked).
|
||||
|
||||
If no prior reviews exist or none have a `findings` array, skip this step silently.
|
||||
|
||||
Output a summary header: `Pre-Landing Review: N issues (X critical, Y informational)`
|
||||
{{CROSS_REVIEW_DEDUP}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 5a: Classify each finding
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user