hai/gstack
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git synced 2026-05-20 03:12:28 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into garrytan/elegance

Browse Source 
# Conflicts:
#	package.json
#	scripts/gen-skill-docs.ts
This commit is contained in:
Garry Tan
2026-03-23 22:17:12 -07:00
parent 84df5f189d 6f1bdb6671
commit d5e857df74
70 changed files with 1000 additions and 200 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

13
office-hours/SKILL.md
View File

@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ name: office-hours
preamble-tier: 3
version: 2.0.0
description: |
MANUAL TRIGGER ONLY: invoke only when user types /office-hours.
YC Office Hours — two modes. Startup mode: six forcing questions that expose
demand reality, status quo, desperate specificity, narrowest wedge, observation,
and future-fit. Builder mode: design thinking brainstorming for side projects,
@@ -585,7 +586,8 @@ Before proposing solutions, challenge the premises:
1. **Is this the right problem?** Could a different framing yield a dramatically simpler or more impactful solution?
2. **What happens if we do nothing?** Real pain point or hypothetical one?
3. **What existing code already partially solves this?** Map existing patterns, utilities, and flows that could be reused.
4. **Startup mode only:** Synthesize the diagnostic evidence from Phase 2A. Does it support this direction? Where are the gaps?
4. **If the deliverable is a new artifact** (CLI binary, library, package, container image, mobile app): **how will users get it?** Code without distribution is code nobody can use. The design must include a distribution channel (GitHub Releases, package manager, container registry, app store) and CI/CD pipeline — or explicitly defer it.
5. **Startup mode only:** Synthesize the diagnostic evidence from Phase 2A. Does it support this direction? Where are the gaps?
Output premises as clear statements the user must agree with before proceeding:
```
@@ -890,6 +892,11 @@ Supersedes: {prior filename — omit this line if first design on this branch}
## Success Criteria
{measurable criteria from Phase 2A}
## Distribution Plan
{how users get the deliverable — binary download, package manager, container image, web service, etc.}
{CI/CD pipeline for building and publishing — GitHub Actions, manual release, auto-deploy on merge?}
{omit this section if the deliverable is a web service with existing deployment pipeline}
## Dependencies
{blockers, prerequisites, related work}
@@ -942,6 +949,10 @@ Supersedes: {prior filename — omit this line if first design on this branch}
## Success Criteria
{what "done" looks like}
## Distribution Plan
{how users get the deliverable — binary download, package manager, container image, web service, etc.}
{CI/CD pipeline for building and publishing — or "existing deployment pipeline covers this"}
## Next Steps
{concrete build tasks — what to implement first, second, third}

12
office-hours/SKILL.md.tmpl
View File

@@ -335,7 +335,8 @@ Before proposing solutions, challenge the premises:
1. **Is this the right problem?** Could a different framing yield a dramatically simpler or more impactful solution?
2. **What happens if we do nothing?** Real pain point or hypothetical one?
3. **What existing code already partially solves this?** Map existing patterns, utilities, and flows that could be reused.
4. **Startup mode only:** Synthesize the diagnostic evidence from Phase 2A. Does it support this direction? Where are the gaps?
4. **If the deliverable is a new artifact** (CLI binary, library, package, container image, mobile app): **how will users get it?** Code without distribution is code nobody can use. The design must include a distribution channel (GitHub Releases, package manager, container registry, app store) and CI/CD pipeline — or explicitly defer it.
5. **Startup mode only:** Synthesize the diagnostic evidence from Phase 2A. Does it support this direction? Where are the gaps?
Output premises as clear statements the user must agree with before proceeding:
```
@@ -475,6 +476,11 @@ Supersedes: {prior filename — omit this line if first design on this branch}
## Success Criteria
{measurable criteria from Phase 2A}
## Distribution Plan
{how users get the deliverable — binary download, package manager, container image, web service, etc.}
{CI/CD pipeline for building and publishing — GitHub Actions, manual release, auto-deploy on merge?}
{omit this section if the deliverable is a web service with existing deployment pipeline}
## Dependencies
{blockers, prerequisites, related work}
@@ -527,6 +533,10 @@ Supersedes: {prior filename — omit this line if first design on this branch}
## Success Criteria
{what "done" looks like}
## Distribution Plan
{how users get the deliverable — binary download, package manager, container image, web service, etc.}
{CI/CD pipeline for building and publishing — or "existing deployment pipeline covers this"}
## Next Steps
{concrete build tasks — what to implement first, second, third}