feat: /design-consultation — risk-taking thesis, visual research, ambitious preview

Add SAFE/RISK breakdown to design proposals so users see which choices
match category conventions vs. which are deliberate creative departures.

Wire browse binary for visual competitive research — agent browses
competitor sites, takes screenshots, and analyzes fonts/colors/spacing
with graceful degradation to WebSearch-only or built-in knowledge.

Upgrade preview page instructions to render realistic product mockups
(dashboards, marketing pages, settings forms) instead of just swatches.

Rewrite README section with the thesis: "coherence is table stakes —
the real question is where you take risks."

ship/SKILL.md.tmpl

@@ -50,6 +50,15 @@ You are running the `/ship` workflow. This is a **non-interactive, fully automat
 
 3. Run `git diff <base>...HEAD --stat` and `git log <base>..HEAD --oneline` to understand what's being shipped.
 
+4. Check review readiness:
+
+{{REVIEW_DASHBOARD}}
+
+If the verdict is NOT "CLEARED TO SHIP (3/3)", use AskUserQuestion:
+- Show which reviews are missing or have open issues
+- RECOMMENDATION: Choose B (run missing reviews first) unless the change is trivial
+- Options: A) Ship anyway  B) Abort — run missing review(s) first  C) Reviews not relevant for this change
+
 ---
 
 ## Step 2: Merge the base branch (BEFORE tests)