hai/gstack
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git synced 2026-05-21 12:18:24 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix: address adversarial review findings — codex review cwd, test scope, fail-loud

Browse Source 
1. codex review commands now cd to $_REPO_ROOT (review doesn't support -C)
2. Autoplan codex commands converted from prose "Prerequisite" to fenced bash blocks
3. || pwd fallback replaced with hard fail — silent wrong-dir is worse than error
4. Regression test now scans all resolver .ts files + generated SKILL.md files

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Garry Tan
2026-03-26 22:27:02 -06:00
parent 2c3a2fff43
commit e431344078
15 changed files with 99 additions and 47 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
ship/SKILL.md
View File

@@ -1347,7 +1347,7 @@ If Codex is available, run a lightweight design check on the diff:
```bash
TMPERR_DRL=$(mktemp /tmp/codex-drl-XXXXXXXX)
_REPO_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)
_REPO_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel) || { echo "ERROR: not in a git repo" >&2; exit 1; }
codex exec "Review the git diff on this branch. Run 7 litmus checks (YES/NO each): 1. Brand/product unmistakable in first screen? 2. One strong visual anchor present? 3. Page understandable by scanning headlines only? 4. Each section has one job? 5. Are cards actually necessary? 6. Does motion improve hierarchy or atmosphere? 7. Would design feel premium with all decorative shadows removed? Flag any hard rejections: 1. Generic SaaS card grid as first impression 2. Beautiful image with weak brand 3. Strong headline with no clear action 4. Busy imagery behind text 5. Sections repeating same mood statement 6. Carousel with no narrative purpose 7. App UI made of stacked cards instead of layout 5 most important design findings only. Reference file:line." -C "$_REPO_ROOT" -s read-only -c 'model_reasoning_effort="high"' --enable web_search_cached 2>"$TMPERR_DRL"
```
@@ -1470,7 +1470,7 @@ Claude's structured review already ran. Now add a **cross-model adversarial chal
```bash
TMPERR_ADV=$(mktemp /tmp/codex-adv-XXXXXXXX)
_REPO_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)
_REPO_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel) || { echo "ERROR: not in a git repo" >&2; exit 1; }
codex exec "Review the changes on this branch against the base branch. Run git diff origin/<base> to see the diff. Your job is to find ways this code will fail in production. Think like an attacker and a chaos engineer. Find edge cases, race conditions, security holes, resource leaks, failure modes, and silent data corruption paths. Be adversarial. Be thorough. No compliments — just the problems." -C "$_REPO_ROOT" -s read-only -c 'model_reasoning_effort="high"' --enable web_search_cached 2>"$TMPERR_ADV"
```
@@ -1516,6 +1516,8 @@ Claude's structured review already ran. Now run **all three remaining passes** f
**1. Codex structured review (if available):**
```bash
TMPERR=$(mktemp /tmp/codex-review-XXXXXXXX)
_REPO_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel) || { echo "ERROR: not in a git repo" >&2; exit 1; }
cd "$_REPO_ROOT"
codex review --base <base> -c 'model_reasoning_effort="high"' --enable web_search_cached 2>"$TMPERR"
```