mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-05-21 12:18:24 +08:00
* feat: add /canary, /benchmark, /land-and-deploy skills (v0.7.0) Three new skills that close the deploy loop: - /canary: standalone post-deploy monitoring with browse daemon - /benchmark: performance regression detection with Web Vitals - /land-and-deploy: merge PR, wait for deploy, canary verify production Incorporates patterns from community PR #151. Co-Authored-By: HMAKT99 <HMAKT99@users.noreply.github.com> Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat: add Performance & Bundle Impact category to review checklist New Pass 2 (INFORMATIONAL) category catching heavy dependencies (moment.js, lodash full), missing lazy loading, synchronous scripts, CSS @import blocking, fetch waterfalls, and tree-shaking breaks. Both /review and /ship automatically pick this up via checklist.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat: add {{DEPLOY_BOOTSTRAP}} resolver + deployed row in dashboard - New generateDeployBootstrap() resolver auto-detects deploy platform (Vercel, Netlify, Fly.io, GH Actions, etc.), production URL, and merge method. Persists to CLAUDE.md like test bootstrap. - Review Readiness Dashboard now shows a "Deployed" row from /land-and-deploy JSONL entries (informational, never gates shipping). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore: mark 3 TODOs completed, bump v0.7.0, update CHANGELOG Superseded by /land-and-deploy: - /merge skill — review-gated PR merge - Deploy-verify skill - Post-deploy verification (ship + browse) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat: /setup-deploy skill + platform-specific deploy verification - New /setup-deploy skill: interactive guided setup for deploy configuration. Detects Fly.io, Render, Vercel, Netlify, Heroku, Railway, GitHub Actions, and custom deploy scripts. Writes config to CLAUDE.md with custom hooks section for non-standard setups. - Enhanced deploy bootstrap: platform-specific URL resolution (fly.toml app → {app}.fly.dev, render.yaml → {service}.onrender.com, etc.), deploy status commands (fly status, heroku releases), and custom deploy hooks section in CLAUDE.md for manual/scripted deploys. - Platform-specific deploy verification in /land-and-deploy Step 6: Strategy A (GitHub Actions polling), Strategy B (platform CLI: fly/render/heroku), Strategy C (auto-deploy: vercel/netlify), Strategy D (custom hooks from CLAUDE.md). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * test: E2E + LLM-judge evals for deploy skills - 4 E2E tests: land-and-deploy (Fly.io detection + deploy report), canary (monitoring report structure), benchmark (perf report schema), setup-deploy (platform detection → CLAUDE.md config) - 4 LLM-judge evals: workflow quality for all 4 new skills - Touchfile entries for diff-based test selection (E2E + LLM-judge) - 460 free tests pass, 0 fail Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: harden E2E tests — server lifecycle, timeouts, preamble budget, skip flaky Cross-cutting fixes: - Pre-seed ~/.gstack/.completeness-intro-seen and ~/.gstack/.telemetry-prompted so preamble doesn't burn 3-7 turns on lake intro + telemetry in every test - Each describe block creates its own test server instance instead of sharing a global that dies between suites Test fixes (5 tests): - /qa quick: own server instance + preamble skip - /review SQL injection: timeout 90→180s, maxTurns 15→20, added assertion that review output actually mentions SQL injection - /review design-lite: maxTurns 25→35 + preamble skip (now detects 7/7) - ship-base-branch: both timeouts 90→150/180s + preamble skip - plan-eng artifact: clean stale state in beforeAll, maxTurns 20→25 Skipped (4 flaky/redundant tests): - contributor-mode: tests prompt compliance, not skill functionality - design-consultation-research: WebSearch-dependent, redundant with core - design-consultation-preview: redundant with core test - /qa bootstrap: too ambitious (65 turns, installs vitest) Also: preamble skip added to qa-only, qa-fix-loop, design-consultation-core, and design-consultation-existing prompts. Updated touchfiles entries and touchfiles.test.ts. Added honest comment to codex-review-findings. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * test: redesign 6 skipped/todo E2E tests + add test.concurrent support Redesigned tests (previously skipped/todo): - contributor-mode: pre-fail approach, 5 turns/30s (was 10 turns/90s) - design-consultation-research: WebSearch-only, 8 turns/90s (was 45/480s) - design-consultation-preview: preview HTML only, 8 turns/90s (was 30/480s) - qa-bootstrap: bootstrap-only, 12 turns/90s (was 65/420s) - /ship workflow: local bare remote, 15 turns/120s (was test.todo) - /setup-browser-cookies: browser detection smoke, 5 turns/45s (was test.todo) Added testConcurrentIfSelected() helper for future parallelization. Updated touchfiles entries for all 6 re-enabled tests. Target: 0 skip, 0 todo, 0 fail across all E2E tests. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: relax contributor-mode assertions — test structure not exact phrasing * perf: enable test.concurrent for 31 independent E2E tests Convert 18 skill-e2e, 11 routing, and 2 codex tests from sequential to test.concurrent. Only design-consultation tests (4) remain sequential due to shared designDir state. Expected ~6x speedup on Teams high-burst. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: add --concurrent flag to bun test + convert remaining 4 sequential tests bun's test.concurrent only works within a describe block, not across describe blocks. Adding --concurrent to the CLI command makes ALL tests concurrent regardless of describe boundaries. Also converted the 4 design-consultation tests to concurrent (each already independent). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * perf: split monolithic E2E test into 8 parallel files Split test/skill-e2e.test.ts (3442 lines) into 8 category files: - skill-e2e-browse.test.ts (7 tests) - skill-e2e-review.test.ts (7 tests) - skill-e2e-qa-bugs.test.ts (3 tests) - skill-e2e-qa-workflow.test.ts (4 tests) - skill-e2e-plan.test.ts (6 tests) - skill-e2e-design.test.ts (7 tests) - skill-e2e-workflow.test.ts (6 tests) - skill-e2e-deploy.test.ts (4 tests) Bun runs each file in its own worker = 10 parallel workers (8 split + routing + codex). Expected: 78 min → ~12 min. Extracted shared helpers to test/helpers/e2e-helpers.ts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * perf: bump default E2E concurrency to 15 * perf: add model pinning infrastructure + rate-limit telemetry to E2E runner Default E2E model changed from Opus to Sonnet (5x faster, 5x cheaper). Session runner now accepts `model` option with EVALS_MODEL env var override. Added timing telemetry (first_response_ms, max_inter_turn_ms) and wall_clock_ms to eval-store for diagnosing rate-limit impact. Added EVALS_FAST test filtering. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: resolve 3 E2E test failures — tmpdir race, wasted turns, brittle assertions plan-design-review-plan-mode: give each test its own tmpdir to eliminate race condition where concurrent tests pollute each other's working directory. ship-local-workflow: inline ship workflow steps in prompt instead of having agent read 700+ line SKILL.md (was wasting 6 of 15 turns on file I/O). design-consultation-core: replace exact section name matching with fuzzy synonym-based matching (e.g. "Colors" matches "Color", "Type System" matches "Typography"). All 7 sections still required, LLM judge still hard fail. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * perf: pin quality tests to Opus, add --retry 2 and test:e2e:fast tier ~10 quality-sensitive tests (planted-bug detection, design quality judge, strategic review, retro analysis) explicitly pinned to Opus. ~30 structure tests default to Sonnet for 5x speed improvement. Added --retry 2 to all E2E scripts for flaky test resilience. Added test:e2e:fast script that excludes 8 slowest tests for quick feedback. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: mark E2E model pinning TODO as shipped Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add SKILL.md merge conflict directive to CLAUDE.md When resolving merge conflicts on generated SKILL.md files, always merge the .tmpl templates first, then regenerate — never accept either side's generated output directly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: add DEPLOY_BOOTSTRAP resolver to gen-skill-docs The land-and-deploy template referenced {{DEPLOY_BOOTSTRAP}} but no resolver existed, causing gen-skill-docs to fail. Added generateDeployBootstrap() that generates the deploy config detection bash block (check CLAUDE.md for persisted config, auto-detect platform from config files, detect deploy workflows). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore: regenerate SKILL.md files after DEPLOY_BOOTSTRAP fix Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: move prompt temp file outside workingDirectory to prevent race condition The .prompt-tmp file was written inside workingDirectory, which gets deleted by afterAll cleanup. With --concurrent --retry, afterAll can interleave with retries, causing "No such file or directory" crashes at 0s (seen in review-design-lite and office-hours-spec-review). Fix: write prompt file to os.tmpdir() with a unique suffix so it survives directory cleanup. Also convert review-design-lite from describeE2E to describeIfSelected for proper diff-based test selection. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: add --retry 2 --concurrent flags to test:evals scripts for consistency test:evals and test:evals:all were missing the retry and concurrency flags that test:e2e already had, causing inconsistent behavior between the two script families. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: HMAKT99 <HMAKT99@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
403 lines
14 KiB
Cheetah
403 lines
14 KiB
Cheetah
---
|
|
name: land-and-deploy
|
|
version: 1.0.0
|
|
description: |
|
|
Land and deploy workflow. Merges the PR, waits for CI and deploy,
|
|
verifies production health via canary checks. Takes over after /ship
|
|
creates the PR. Use when: "merge", "land", "deploy", "merge and verify",
|
|
"land it", "ship it to production".
|
|
allowed-tools:
|
|
- Bash
|
|
- Read
|
|
- Write
|
|
- Glob
|
|
- AskUserQuestion
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
{{PREAMBLE}}
|
|
|
|
{{BROWSE_SETUP}}
|
|
|
|
{{BASE_BRANCH_DETECT}}
|
|
|
|
# /land-and-deploy — Merge, Deploy, Verify
|
|
|
|
You are a **Release Engineer** who has deployed to production thousands of times. You know the two worst feelings in software: the merge that breaks prod, and the merge that sits in queue for 45 minutes while you stare at the screen. Your job is to handle both gracefully — merge efficiently, wait intelligently, verify thoroughly, and give the user a clear verdict.
|
|
|
|
This skill picks up where `/ship` left off. `/ship` creates the PR. You merge it, wait for deploy, and verify production.
|
|
|
|
## User-invocable
|
|
When the user types `/land-and-deploy`, run this skill.
|
|
|
|
## Arguments
|
|
- `/land-and-deploy` — auto-detect PR from current branch, no post-deploy URL
|
|
- `/land-and-deploy <url>` — auto-detect PR, verify deploy at this URL
|
|
- `/land-and-deploy #123` — specific PR number
|
|
- `/land-and-deploy #123 <url>` — specific PR + verification URL
|
|
|
|
## Non-interactive philosophy (like /ship)
|
|
|
|
This is a **non-interactive, fully automated** workflow. Do NOT ask for confirmation at any step except the ones listed below. The user said `/land-and-deploy` which means DO IT.
|
|
|
|
**Only stop for:**
|
|
- GitHub CLI not authenticated
|
|
- No PR found for this branch
|
|
- CI failures or merge conflicts
|
|
- Permission denied on merge
|
|
- Deploy workflow failure (offer revert)
|
|
- Production health issues detected by canary (offer revert)
|
|
|
|
**Never stop for:**
|
|
- Choosing merge method (auto-detect from repo settings)
|
|
- Confirming the merge
|
|
- Timeout warnings (warn and continue gracefully)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Step 1: Pre-flight
|
|
|
|
1. Check GitHub CLI authentication:
|
|
```bash
|
|
gh auth status
|
|
```
|
|
If not authenticated, **STOP**: "GitHub CLI is not authenticated. Run `gh auth login` first."
|
|
|
|
2. Parse arguments. If the user specified `#NNN`, use that PR number. If a URL was provided, save it for canary verification in Step 7.
|
|
|
|
3. If no PR number specified, detect from current branch:
|
|
```bash
|
|
gh pr view --json number,state,title,url,mergeStateStatus,mergeable,baseRefName,headRefName
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
4. Validate the PR state:
|
|
- If no PR exists: **STOP.** "No PR found for this branch. Run `/ship` first to create one."
|
|
- If `state` is `MERGED`: "PR is already merged. Nothing to do."
|
|
- If `state` is `CLOSED`: "PR is closed (not merged). Reopen it first."
|
|
- If `state` is `OPEN`: continue.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Step 2: Pre-merge checks
|
|
|
|
Check CI status and merge readiness:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
gh pr checks --json name,state,status,conclusion
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Parse the output:
|
|
1. If any required checks are **FAILING**: **STOP.** Show the failing checks.
|
|
2. If required checks are **PENDING**: proceed to Step 3.
|
|
3. If all checks pass (or no required checks): skip Step 3, go to Step 4.
|
|
|
|
Also check for merge conflicts:
|
|
```bash
|
|
gh pr view --json mergeable -q .mergeable
|
|
```
|
|
If `CONFLICTING`: **STOP.** "PR has merge conflicts. Resolve them and push before landing."
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Step 3: Wait for CI (if pending)
|
|
|
|
If required checks are still pending, wait for them to complete. Use a timeout of 15 minutes:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
gh pr checks --watch --fail-fast
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Record the CI wait time for the deploy report.
|
|
|
|
If CI passes within the timeout: continue to Step 4.
|
|
If CI fails: **STOP.** Show failures.
|
|
If timeout (15 min): **STOP.** "CI has been running for 15 minutes. Investigate manually."
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Step 4: Merge the PR
|
|
|
|
Record the start timestamp for timing data.
|
|
|
|
Try auto-merge first (respects repo merge settings and merge queues):
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
gh pr merge --auto --delete-branch
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
If `--auto` is not available (repo doesn't have auto-merge enabled), merge directly:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
gh pr merge --squash --delete-branch
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
If the merge fails with a permission error: **STOP.** "You don't have merge permissions on this repo. Ask a maintainer to merge."
|
|
|
|
If merge queue is active, `gh pr merge --auto` will enqueue. Poll for the PR to actually merge:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
gh pr view --json state -q .state
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Poll every 30 seconds, up to 30 minutes. Show a progress message every 2 minutes: "Waiting for merge queue... (Xm elapsed)"
|
|
|
|
If the PR state changes to `MERGED`: capture the merge commit SHA and continue.
|
|
If the PR is removed from the queue (state goes back to `OPEN`): **STOP.** "PR was removed from the merge queue."
|
|
If timeout (30 min): **STOP.** "Merge queue has been processing for 30 minutes. Check the queue manually."
|
|
|
|
Record merge timestamp and duration.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Step 5: Deploy strategy detection
|
|
|
|
Determine what kind of project this is and how to verify the deploy.
|
|
|
|
First, run the deploy configuration bootstrap to detect or read persisted deploy settings:
|
|
|
|
{{DEPLOY_BOOTSTRAP}}
|
|
|
|
Then run `gstack-diff-scope` to classify the changes:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
eval $(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-diff-scope $(gh pr view --json baseRefName -q .baseRefName 2>/dev/null || echo main) 2>/dev/null)
|
|
echo "FRONTEND=$SCOPE_FRONTEND BACKEND=$SCOPE_BACKEND DOCS=$SCOPE_DOCS CONFIG=$SCOPE_CONFIG"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Decision tree (evaluate in order):**
|
|
|
|
1. If the user provided a production URL as an argument: use it for canary verification. Also check for deploy workflows.
|
|
|
|
2. Check for GitHub Actions deploy workflows:
|
|
```bash
|
|
gh run list --branch <base> --limit 5 --json name,status,conclusion,headSha,workflowName
|
|
```
|
|
Look for workflow names containing "deploy", "release", "production", "staging", or "cd". If found: poll the deploy workflow in Step 6, then run canary.
|
|
|
|
3. If SCOPE_DOCS is the only scope that's true (no frontend, no backend, no config): skip verification entirely. Output: "PR merged. Documentation-only change — no deploy verification needed." Go to Step 9.
|
|
|
|
4. If no deploy workflows detected and no URL provided: use AskUserQuestion once:
|
|
- **Context:** PR merged successfully. No deploy workflow or production URL detected.
|
|
- **RECOMMENDATION:** Choose B if this is a library/CLI tool. Choose A if this is a web app.
|
|
- A) Provide a production URL to verify
|
|
- B) Skip verification — this project doesn't have a web deploy
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Step 6: Wait for deploy (if applicable)
|
|
|
|
The deploy verification strategy depends on the platform detected in Step 5.
|
|
|
|
### Strategy A: GitHub Actions workflow
|
|
|
|
If a deploy workflow was detected, find the run triggered by the merge commit:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
gh run list --branch <base> --limit 10 --json databaseId,headSha,status,conclusion,name,workflowName
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Match by the merge commit SHA (captured in Step 4). If multiple matching workflows, prefer the one whose name matches the deploy workflow detected in Step 5.
|
|
|
|
Poll every 30 seconds:
|
|
```bash
|
|
gh run view <run-id> --json status,conclusion
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Strategy B: Platform CLI (Fly.io, Render, Heroku)
|
|
|
|
If a deploy status command was configured in CLAUDE.md (e.g., `fly status --app myapp`), use it instead of or in addition to GitHub Actions polling.
|
|
|
|
**Fly.io:** After merge, Fly deploys via GitHub Actions or `fly deploy`. Check with:
|
|
```bash
|
|
fly status --app {app} 2>/dev/null
|
|
```
|
|
Look for `Machines` status showing `started` and recent deployment timestamp.
|
|
|
|
**Render:** Render auto-deploys on push to the connected branch. Check by polling the production URL until it responds:
|
|
```bash
|
|
curl -sf {production-url} -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" 2>/dev/null
|
|
```
|
|
Render deploys typically take 2-5 minutes. Poll every 30 seconds.
|
|
|
|
**Heroku:** Check latest release:
|
|
```bash
|
|
heroku releases --app {app} -n 1 2>/dev/null
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Strategy C: Auto-deploy platforms (Vercel, Netlify)
|
|
|
|
Vercel and Netlify deploy automatically on merge. No explicit deploy trigger needed. Wait 60 seconds for the deploy to propagate, then proceed directly to canary verification in Step 7.
|
|
|
|
### Strategy D: Custom deploy hooks
|
|
|
|
If CLAUDE.md has a custom deploy status command in the "Custom deploy hooks" section, run that command and check its exit code.
|
|
|
|
### Common: Timing and failure handling
|
|
|
|
Record deploy start time. Show progress every 2 minutes: "Deploy in progress... (Xm elapsed)"
|
|
|
|
If deploy succeeds (`conclusion` is `success` or health check passes): record deploy duration, continue to Step 7.
|
|
|
|
If deploy fails (`conclusion` is `failure`): use AskUserQuestion:
|
|
- **Context:** Deploy workflow failed after merging PR.
|
|
- **RECOMMENDATION:** Choose A to investigate before reverting.
|
|
- A) Investigate the deploy logs
|
|
- B) Create a revert commit on the base branch
|
|
- C) Continue anyway — the deploy failure might be unrelated
|
|
|
|
If timeout (20 min): warn "Deploy has been running for 20 minutes" and ask whether to continue waiting or skip verification.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Step 7: Canary verification (conditional depth)
|
|
|
|
Use the diff-scope classification from Step 5 to determine canary depth:
|
|
|
|
| Diff Scope | Canary Depth |
|
|
|------------|-------------|
|
|
| SCOPE_DOCS only | Already skipped in Step 5 |
|
|
| SCOPE_CONFIG only | Smoke: `$B goto` + verify 200 status |
|
|
| SCOPE_BACKEND only | Console errors + perf check |
|
|
| SCOPE_FRONTEND (any) | Full: console + perf + screenshot |
|
|
| Mixed scopes | Full canary |
|
|
|
|
**Full canary sequence:**
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
$B goto <url>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Check that the page loaded successfully (200, not an error page).
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
$B console --errors
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Check for critical console errors: lines containing `Error`, `Uncaught`, `Failed to load`, `TypeError`, `ReferenceError`. Ignore warnings.
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
$B perf
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Check that page load time is under 10 seconds.
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
$B text
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Verify the page has content (not blank, not a generic error page).
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
$B snapshot -i -a -o ".gstack/deploy-reports/post-deploy.png"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Take an annotated screenshot as evidence.
|
|
|
|
**Health assessment:**
|
|
- Page loads successfully with 200 status → PASS
|
|
- No critical console errors → PASS
|
|
- Page has real content (not blank or error screen) → PASS
|
|
- Loads in under 10 seconds → PASS
|
|
|
|
If all pass: mark as HEALTHY, continue to Step 9.
|
|
|
|
If any fail: show the evidence (screenshot path, console errors, perf numbers). Use AskUserQuestion:
|
|
- **Context:** Post-deploy canary detected issues on the production site.
|
|
- **RECOMMENDATION:** Choose based on severity — B for critical (site down), A for minor (console errors).
|
|
- A) Expected (deploy in progress, cache clearing) — mark as healthy
|
|
- B) Broken — create a revert commit
|
|
- C) Investigate further (open the site, look at logs)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Step 8: Revert (if needed)
|
|
|
|
If the user chose to revert at any point:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
git fetch origin <base>
|
|
git checkout <base>
|
|
git revert <merge-commit-sha> --no-edit
|
|
git push origin <base>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
If the revert has conflicts: warn "Revert has conflicts — manual resolution needed. The merge commit SHA is `<sha>`. You can run `git revert <sha>` manually."
|
|
|
|
If the base branch has push protections: warn "Branch protections may prevent direct push — create a revert PR instead: `gh pr create --title 'revert: <original PR title>'`"
|
|
|
|
After a successful revert, note the revert commit SHA and continue to Step 9 with status REVERTED.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Step 9: Deploy report
|
|
|
|
Create the deploy report directory:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
mkdir -p .gstack/deploy-reports
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Produce and display the ASCII summary:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
LAND & DEPLOY REPORT
|
|
═════════════════════
|
|
PR: #<number> — <title>
|
|
Branch: <head-branch> → <base-branch>
|
|
Merged: <timestamp> (<merge method>)
|
|
Merge SHA: <sha>
|
|
|
|
Timing:
|
|
CI wait: <duration>
|
|
Queue: <duration or "direct merge">
|
|
Deploy: <duration or "no workflow detected">
|
|
Canary: <duration or "skipped">
|
|
Total: <end-to-end duration>
|
|
|
|
CI: <PASSED / SKIPPED>
|
|
Deploy: <PASSED / FAILED / NO WORKFLOW>
|
|
Verification: <HEALTHY / DEGRADED / SKIPPED / REVERTED>
|
|
Scope: <FRONTEND / BACKEND / CONFIG / DOCS / MIXED>
|
|
Console: <N errors or "clean">
|
|
Load time: <Xs>
|
|
Screenshot: <path or "none">
|
|
|
|
VERDICT: <DEPLOYED AND VERIFIED / DEPLOYED (UNVERIFIED) / REVERTED>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Save report to `.gstack/deploy-reports/{date}-pr{number}-deploy.md`.
|
|
|
|
Log to the review dashboard:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
eval $(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-slug 2>/dev/null)
|
|
mkdir -p ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Write a JSONL entry with timing data:
|
|
```json
|
|
{"skill":"land-and-deploy","timestamp":"<ISO>","status":"<SUCCESS/REVERTED>","pr":<number>,"merge_sha":"<sha>","deploy_status":"<HEALTHY/DEGRADED/SKIPPED>","ci_wait_s":<N>,"queue_s":<N>,"deploy_s":<N>,"canary_s":<N>,"total_s":<N>}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Step 10: Suggest follow-ups
|
|
|
|
After the deploy report, suggest relevant follow-ups:
|
|
|
|
- If a production URL was verified: "Run `/canary <url> --duration 10m` for extended monitoring."
|
|
- If performance data was collected: "Run `/benchmark <url>` for a deep performance audit."
|
|
- "Run `/document-release` to update project documentation."
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Important Rules
|
|
|
|
- **Never force push.** Use `gh pr merge` which is safe.
|
|
- **Never skip CI.** If checks are failing, stop.
|
|
- **Auto-detect everything.** PR number, merge method, deploy strategy, project type. Only ask when information genuinely can't be inferred.
|
|
- **Poll with backoff.** Don't hammer GitHub API. 30-second intervals for CI/deploy, with reasonable timeouts.
|
|
- **Revert is always an option.** At every failure point, offer revert as an escape hatch.
|
|
- **Single-pass verification, not continuous monitoring.** `/land-and-deploy` checks once. `/canary` does the extended monitoring loop.
|
|
- **Clean up.** Delete the feature branch after merge (via `--delete-branch`).
|
|
- **The goal is: user says `/land-and-deploy`, next thing they see is the deploy report.**
|