Files
gstack/review/SKILL.md
Garry Tan 6b69c46a27 feat: daily update check + /gstack-upgrade skill (v0.3.4) (#42)
* feat: add daily update check script + /gstack-upgrade skill

bin/gstack-update-check: pure bash, checks VERSION against remote once/day,
outputs UPGRADE_AVAILABLE or JUST_UPGRADED. Uses ~/.gstack/ for state.

gstack-upgrade/SKILL.md: new skill with inline upgrade flow for all preambles.
Detects global-git, local-git, vendored installs. Shows What's New from CHANGELOG.

browse/test/gstack-update-check.test.ts: 10 test cases covering all branch paths.

* refactor: remove version check from find-browse, simplify to binary locator

Delete checkVersion(), readCache(), writeCache(), fetchRemoteSHA(),
resolveSkillDir(), CacheEntry interface, REPO_URL/CACHE_PATH/CACHE_TTL
constants, and META output from find-browse.ts.

Version checking is now handled by bin/gstack-update-check (previous commit).

* feat: add update check preamble to all 9 skills

Every skill now runs bin/gstack-update-check on invocation. If an upgrade
is available, reads gstack-upgrade/SKILL.md inline upgrade flow.

Also adds AskUserQuestion to 5 skills that lacked it (gstack root, browse,
qa, retro, setup-browser-cookies) and Bash to plan-eng-review.

Simplifies qa and setup-browser-cookies setup blocks (removes META parsing).

* chore: bump version and changelog (v0.3.4)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: remove unused import + add corrupt cache test

Address pre-landing review findings:
- Remove unused mkdirSync import from gstack-update-check.test.ts
- Add Path I test: corrupt cache file falls through to remote fetch

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-13 22:17:25 -07:00

122 lines
5.2 KiB
Markdown

---
name: review
version: 1.0.0
description: |
Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against main for SQL safety, LLM trust
boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues.
allowed-tools:
- Bash
- Read
- Edit
- Write
- Grep
- Glob
- AskUserQuestion
---
## Update Check (run first)
```bash
_UPD=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-update-check 2>/dev/null || .claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-update-check 2>/dev/null || true)
[ -n "$_UPD" ] && echo "$_UPD"
```
If output shows `UPGRADE_AVAILABLE <old> <new>`: read `~/.claude/skills/gstack/gstack-upgrade/SKILL.md` and follow the "Inline upgrade flow" (AskUserQuestion → upgrade if yes, `touch ~/.gstack/last-update-check` if no). If `JUST_UPGRADED <from> <to>`: tell user "Running gstack v{to} (just updated!)" and continue.
# Pre-Landing PR Review
You are running the `/review` workflow. Analyze the current branch's diff against main for structural issues that tests don't catch.
---
## Step 1: Check branch
1. Run `git branch --show-current` to get the current branch.
2. If on `main`, output: **"Nothing to review — you're on main or have no changes against main."** and stop.
3. Run `git fetch origin main --quiet && git diff origin/main --stat` to check if there's a diff. If no diff, output the same message and stop.
---
## Step 2: Read the checklist
Read `.claude/skills/review/checklist.md`.
**If the file cannot be read, STOP and report the error.** Do not proceed without the checklist.
---
## Step 2.5: Check for Greptile review comments
Read `.claude/skills/review/greptile-triage.md` and follow the fetch, filter, and classify steps.
**If no PR exists, `gh` fails, API returns an error, or there are zero Greptile comments:** Skip this step silently. Greptile integration is additive — the review works without it.
**If Greptile comments are found:** Store the classifications (VALID & ACTIONABLE, VALID BUT ALREADY FIXED, FALSE POSITIVE, SUPPRESSED) — you will need them in Step 5.
---
## Step 3: Get the diff
Fetch the latest main to avoid false positives from a stale local main:
```bash
git fetch origin main --quiet
```
Run `git diff origin/main` to get the full diff. This includes both committed and uncommitted changes against the latest main.
---
## Step 4: Two-pass review
Apply the checklist against the diff in two passes:
1. **Pass 1 (CRITICAL):** SQL & Data Safety, LLM Output Trust Boundary
2. **Pass 2 (INFORMATIONAL):** Conditional Side Effects, Magic Numbers & String Coupling, Dead Code & Consistency, LLM Prompt Issues, Test Gaps, View/Frontend
Follow the output format specified in the checklist. Respect the suppressions — do NOT flag items listed in the "DO NOT flag" section.
---
## Step 5: Output findings
**Always output ALL findings** — both critical and informational. The user must see every issue.
- If CRITICAL issues found: output all findings, then for EACH critical issue use a separate AskUserQuestion with the problem, your recommended fix, and options (A: Fix it now, B: Acknowledge, C: False positive — skip).
After all critical questions are answered, output a summary of what the user chose for each issue. If the user chose A (fix) on any issue, apply the recommended fixes. If only B/C were chosen, no action needed.
- If only non-critical issues found: output findings. No further action needed.
- If no issues found: output `Pre-Landing Review: No issues found.`
### Greptile comment resolution
After outputting your own findings, if Greptile comments were classified in Step 2.5:
**Include a Greptile summary in your output header:** `+ N Greptile comments (X valid, Y fixed, Z FP)`
1. **VALID & ACTIONABLE comments:** These are already included in your CRITICAL findings — they follow the same AskUserQuestion flow (A: Fix it now, B: Acknowledge, C: False positive). If the user chooses C (false positive), post a reply using the appropriate API from the triage doc and save the pattern to `~/.gstack/greptile-history.md` (type: fp).
2. **FALSE POSITIVE comments:** Present each one via AskUserQuestion:
- Show the Greptile comment: file:line (or [top-level]) + body summary + permalink URL
- Explain concisely why it's a false positive
- Options:
- A) Reply to Greptile explaining why this is incorrect (recommended if clearly wrong)
- B) Fix it anyway (if low-effort and harmless)
- C) Ignore — don't reply, don't fix
If the user chooses A, post a reply using the appropriate API from the triage doc and save the pattern to `~/.gstack/greptile-history.md` (type: fp).
3. **VALID BUT ALREADY FIXED comments:** Reply acknowledging the catch — no AskUserQuestion needed:
- Post reply: `"Good catch — already fixed in <commit-sha>."`
- Save to `~/.gstack/greptile-history.md` (type: already-fixed)
4. **SUPPRESSED comments:** Skip silently — these are known false positives from previous triage.
---
## Important Rules
- **Read the FULL diff before commenting.** Do not flag issues already addressed in the diff.
- **Read-only by default.** Only modify files if the user explicitly chooses "Fix it now" on a critical issue. Never commit, push, or create PRs.
- **Be terse.** One line problem, one line fix. No preamble.
- **Only flag real problems.** Skip anything that's fine.