* feat(document-release): add Diataxis coverage map, diagram drift detection, and docs debt tracking Inspired by @doodlestein's documentation-website skill. Three key ideas incorporated: 1. Step 1.5: Coverage Map (Blast-Radius Analysis) — before editing any docs, scan the diff for new public surface and assess documentation coverage across Diataxis quadrants (reference/how-to/tutorial/explanation). Flags gaps without auto-generating content. 2. Architecture diagram drift detection — extracts entity names from ASCII/Mermaid diagrams and cross-references against the diff to catch stale diagrams. 3. Enhanced CHANGELOG sell test — Diataxis rubric scoring (0-3) replaces the subjective 'would a user want this?' check. 4. Documentation Debt section in PR body — surfaces coverage gaps and diagram drift as actionable items for future work. All changes are audit-only: the skill flags what's missing, never auto-generates missing documentation pages. Stays in its lane as a post-ship updater. Co-Authored-By: Hermes Agent <agent@nousresearch.com> * feat(document-generate): add Diataxis documentation generation skill New /document-generate skill, the companion to /document-release. While /document-release audits and fixes existing docs post-ship, /document-generate writes missing documentation from scratch using the Diataxis framework. Inspired by doodlestein documentation-website-for-software-project skill. Co-Authored-By: Hermes Agent <agent@nousresearch.com> * chore(docs): regenerate gstack/llms.txt with /document-generate entry CI's check-freshness step ran gen:skill-docs and found llms.txt stale — the index wasn't regenerated when /document-generate was added in the preceding commit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(docs): regen document-generate/SKILL.md after merging main Main brought in the Non-ASCII characters directive in the AskUserQuestion Format resolver (scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts). Regenerating document-generate/SKILL.md propagates the new section into the generated output. check-freshness should now pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(CLAUDE.md): add workflow for fork PRs from garrytan-agents Fork PRs from non-collaborators don't get base-repo secrets passed to their CI workflows, so eval/E2E jobs fail with empty-env auth. New section: when checking out a PR from garrytan-agents, push the branch to garrytan/gstack and re-target the PR from there. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: sync project docs for v1.35.0.0 + bump VERSION - README.md: add /document-generate to skills table (Technical Writer category) + install-command skill lists - CLAUDE.md: add document-generate/ to project structure tree - SKILL.md.tmpl + regenerated SKILL.md: add /document-generate routing line ("write docs from scratch") - VERSION: 1.34.0.0 → 1.35.0.0 (MINOR: new skill + enhancement) CHANGELOG entry deferred to /ship. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore: bump version and changelog (v1.35.0.0) CHANGELOG entry for the document-generate skill + document-release Diataxis enhancements. package.json synced to VERSION (drift repair after merging main which had bumped pkg to 1.34.2.0). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: generate /document-generate Diataxis docs (tutorial + how-to + explanation) Fills the documentation debt items flagged by /document-release in PR #1477: critical-gap tutorial coverage and common-gap explanation coverage for the new /document-generate skill. Quadrants: tutorial, how-to, explanation (reference already covered by document-generate/SKILL.md). - docs/tutorial-document-generate.md (1009 words): newcomer 90-second flow - docs/howto-document-a-shipped-feature.md (770 words): post-ship audit + fill workflow - docs/explanation-diataxis-in-gstack.md (1106 words): why Diataxis, trade-offs, alternatives - README.md: links the three docs from the /document-generate skills-table row All cross-links verified — every Related section points at an existing file. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Hermes Agent <agent@nousresearch.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
6.6 KiB
Tutorial: generate docs for a feature in 90 seconds
You'll run /document-generate against a project you already have, watch it write tutorial / how-to / reference / explanation docs in the right places, and end with a coverage map you can drop into a PR. By the end, you'll know the four moves: scope, archaeology, partition, write.
What you'll need
- gstack installed (
git clone --single-branch --depth 1 https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git ~/.claude/skills/gstack && cd ~/.claude/skills/gstack && ./setup) - Claude Code running in any project that has at least one piece of public surface (a CLI command, an exported function, a config option, a skill, an API endpoint)
- About 90 seconds
You do not need a docs/ directory in advance — the skill creates one if it's missing. You do not need to know Diataxis terminology — the skill labels the output for you.
Step 1: Invoke the skill in any project
Open Claude Code in the project you want to document. Type:
/document-generate
You'll see the skill ask one question about output target:
A) Write documentation inline in existing files (README, ARCHITECTURE, etc.)
B) Create standalone documentation files (e.g., docs/ directory)
C) Both — inline summaries in existing files + deep docs in standalone files
RECOMMENDATION: Choose C because it maximizes both discoverability and depth.
Pick C. You'll get a README pointer plus a full set of standalone docs.
Step 2: Watch the archaeology run
The skill goes silent for ~30 seconds while it reads the codebase. This is intentional — the Step 1 "Codebase Archaeology" phase is the most important step in the workflow. The skill is reading:
- The full repository structure
- README, ARCHITECTURE, CONTRIBUTING, CLAUDE.md (the entry points)
- The implementation files for whatever you're documenting (full file, not just signatures)
- The tests (which reveal edge cases and intended behavior)
- Inline comments tagged
// NOTE:,// DESIGN:,// WHY:
When it finishes, you'll see a line like:
Researched 47 files, identified 12 public surface items, 8 concepts, and 4 design decisions.
That number tells you the skill actually read the code rather than guessing from filenames.
Step 3: See the Diataxis partition plan
The skill prints a partition plan showing which quadrants it'll write for which entity:
Documentation plan:
[entity] [tutorial] [how-to] [reference] [explanation]
WidgetService ✅ new ✅ new ✅ new ✅ new
--verbose flag ❌ ✅ new ✅ inline ❌
Bayesian scheduler ❌ ❌ ✅ new ✅ new
Not every entity needs all four quadrants. CLI flags get reference + how-to. Internal modules get reference + explanation. User-facing features get all four. The skill picks based on entity type.
If the plan has more than 5 documents, the skill asks you to confirm before proceeding. Otherwise it goes.
Step 4: Read the first doc that lands
Reference docs land first because they fix the vocabulary. You'll see lines like:
GENERATED: docs/reference-widget-service.md
Open that file. It has a strict structure: one-paragraph intro, complete API listing with types and defaults, 2-3 runnable examples, and a Related section linking to the how-to and tutorial that will land next.
This is what reference docs look like in Diataxis: factual, exhaustive, no narrative. If you find yourself wanting to explain why an option exists, that belongs in the explanation doc the skill will write next.
Step 5: See the explanation, how-to, and tutorial appear
In quick succession (each ~5-10 seconds), the skill writes the remaining quadrants:
GENERATED: docs/explanation-widget-architecture.md
GENERATED: docs/howto-create-a-custom-widget.md
GENERATED: docs/tutorial-build-your-first-widget.md
Open each one. Notice they don't repeat each other:
- Explanation leads with the problem, then the approach, then trade-offs and alternatives considered
- How-to has prerequisites, numbered steps with exact commands, a verification section, and a troubleshooting section
- Tutorial gets you to a working result in under 3 steps, ends with "What you built"
The skill enforces these structures. If a how-to was missing a verification section, the Step 8 Quality Self-Review caught it before commit.
Step 6: Check cross-linking
Every doc links to the others. Reference doc Related section: links to how-to and tutorial. How-to Related section: links to reference. Tutorial "What you built" section: links to reference for deeper exploration.
Run a grep to verify no broken links:
grep -rE '\]\([^)]*\.md\)' docs/ | head -10
Every linked file should exist. The skill's Step 7 "Cross-Document Linking & Discoverability" checks this before commit.
Step 7: See the coverage summary in the PR body
If you're on a feature branch with an open PR, the skill updates the PR body with a ## Documentation Generated table:
## Documentation Generated
| File | Quadrant | Description |
|------|----------|-------------|
| docs/tutorial-build-your-first-widget.md | Tutorial | Walk-through from install to first working widget |
| docs/reference-widget-service.md | Reference | Complete widget API with types, defaults, examples |
| docs/explanation-widget-architecture.md | Explanation | Why widgets are isolated services |
| docs/howto-create-a-custom-widget.md | How-to | Creating and registering custom widgets |
A reviewer opening the PR sees the table and knows immediately what kind of coverage shipped.
What you built
You now have four documents that serve four different readers:
- A newcomer to your project can read
tutorial-*.mdand get something working - An experienced user can read
howto-*.mdto accomplish a specific task - An API caller can read
reference-*.mdfor exact signatures - A code reviewer can read
explanation-*.mdto understand the design
Each one is short enough to maintain. Each one has a single job. The PR body shows which quadrants were covered. If you run /document-release later, the Diataxis coverage map will report this entity as fully covered (4/4 quadrants).
What to do next
- If you have gaps /document-release flagged but didn't fill: run
/document-generateagain, scoped to those entities specifically. - If you want to understand why the four quadrants exist: read explanation-diataxis-in-gstack.md.
- If you want to document one specific shipped feature (not the whole project): read howto-document-a-shipped-feature.md.
- Reference for the skill itself:
document-generate/SKILL.md.